1  ...  7  8  9  10  11  12  ...  31  |   Order by default

Aug 3, 2001, 4:30pm

Not really... Skeletal animation is a different way of animating models. "Vertex movement" would be a way of changing the model's vertices relative to the rest of the model.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Aug 3, 2001, 10:03pm

It logs in three bots...

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Aug 5, 2001, 8:59pm

Copy the building with a bot that runs under a current citizen's privs. Then you can change everything.

-Agent1


[View Quote]

Aug 6, 2001, 1:41pm

Well, the only other way to do something is to get a person with Eminent Domain to make the changes... if the build's in AW, you can't do anything but start over.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Sep 27, 2001, 10:50pm

Don't reply to month-old posts if you're not adding something *significant*.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Aug 17, 2001, 11:40am

Of course he could just add a key to do it -- that's not the hard part. He'd have to rewrite everything that dealt with property updates in order to handle there being another rotation value.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Aug 19, 2001, 2:54pm

[View Quote] No; It always depends on how the programmer uses what is given to him/her. Speed also depends on the quality of your drivers and card (some cards are optimized for OGL or D3D)

> [Snip game comments]

All of those games are programmed by different people. If they each had a D3D and OGL version, then you could compare them. Since they don't, you're comparing apples and oranges.


> D3D uses allso a lot of CPU cache, it runs better on a P3 600> rather
> than a AMD 800...

I have a hard time believing that *anything* would run better at 600MHz than 800...


> anyway, Home and End key are very easy to implent;
> something like this (delphi thought):
>
> [snip code
>
> its not hard thought, yust gota know how to program *g*

No one said it would be hard to add it to the browser. It's more difficult to change the protocol; the browser and worldserver both have to know about it.


> PS: rotate command takes up more space in the celldata file, than
> a extra "value".

And...?



-Agent1

Aug 24, 2001, 11:21am

I would guess that lots of builds that people have are not totally enclosed, so portal rendering wouldn't work all that well in lots of places.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2001, 1:32pm

It would make a good addition, but builds would have to be changed in order to take advantage of portal rendering.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Aug 31, 2001, 7:22pm

You have no ability to make comments/judgements as you're not on the beta list.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Oct 16, 2001, 10:40pm

Post was seven months old...

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Oct 29, 2001, 9:41pm

This has been discussed many times before. One of the problems is what to do if the a part or all of the land has already been built on?

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Oct 30, 2001, 7:19pm

Actually, they are. If you're talking about the visibility menu, it's meant as a temporary change. It's not stored so that if you set it to 200 and it causes your browser to crash or something it'll fall back to the setting in the Settings dialog.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Nov 4, 2001, 4:59pm

Might I ask what the point would be?

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Nov 13, 2001, 4:37pm

If someone has physical access to the machine, you're out of luck. They could just unplug the computer and *all* of the hosted worlds go down.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Nov 19, 2001, 1:18pm

Uhh... what he said it perfectly valid. Just because he doesn't agree with what you said is not a reason to ban him from the newsgroups.

If you're trying to prevent someone from shutting down the world server, I have to tell you it's impossible if they have access to your computer. You shouldn't really run a world server from a desktop computer with other people accessing it anyway.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Nov 18, 2001, 3:13pm

I know someone has ported the SDK to PHP... that would probably allow you to do exactly what you're talking about. I don't know who did it or where it is, though.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Nov 19, 2001, 1:24pm

Why don't you stop whining that people are telling you that you're wrong? People have disagreed with you -- so what?

Rest of my reply is inline


[View Quote] Because people might try to tell you where you can find what you're looking for. Discussing an idea can help make it better.


> Yes I do to at times but only if someone smart mouths me.

LOL :)

> This should be a list on single unreplyed to messages that someone at AW
> reads ( not sure if they do or not ) but weather they do or not is not my
> point here.

No. Because then they would be barraged with messages they don't read, and that are the same as ones sent six months ago. They don't read the newsgroups (except for Roland and Flagg), as far as I know.

> My point is stop replying to wish list topics unless your someone that works
> for AW.

No. The point of an open discussion area is to allow people to help others and, perhaps, better an idea.

> If you don't work at AW why are you replying when you can't do anything
> about it????

They don't read the wishlist, so no one should ever post here or read it, I suppose...

-Agent1

Nov 19, 2001, 8:04pm

That *is* what the wishlist newsgroup is for. Just because that is so doesn't mean that others can't reply to your post. AWC doesn't read this newsgroup anyway, so it doesn't really matter.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Nov 19, 2001, 9:00pm

*gasp* I stand corrected :)

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Dec 2, 2001, 8:32pm

AW isn't an email client... How would that even work? Have the email printed in the chat box? Yuck...

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Dec 3, 2001, 11:44am

(See below for reply)

[View Quote] Those are independant bots. Sending mail is much easier than recieving it, I would assume, because you don't have to worry about keeping track of it once you're done talking to the server.

> Being able to check the email in the browser, would save some ppl from logging off aw and logging onto other programs that can or where ever they
> have to go to check their email, and get side tracked.

You don't have to log off from AW to check Email...

> Instead providing this feature would like them do it all in the browser we love and continue surfing from some advertisement they might have receive through the > built in web window. Aw would like to keep as many users online as any other chat client, AW is striving to evolve in both areas, 3D & chat.

What's wrong with your current email client? AW wasn't meant to be an email client. If it was to be implemented in the browser, it would be awkward at best.


-Agent1

Dec 13, 2001, 4:44pm

Actually, it's "dial" :)

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2001, 8:10pm

[View Quote] Then there's the fact that he needs a new SarcasmDetector :)

-Agent1

Dec 29, 2001, 8:30pm

Could you explain how it encroaches into the privacy of anyone?

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Jan 13, 2002, 9:55pm

I remember asking if you had to pay to renew the bot limit extension, and I
think the answer was yes, you do.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Jan 14, 2002, 12:42pm

I replied to someone who suggested a way of solving your problem. Don't
freak out.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure the only way to increase a bot's range is to run
multiple instances.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Jan 14, 2002, 4:48pm

Since you seemed to have a problem, someone suggested a solution. But you
seem only interested if it would be done EXACTLY your way...

-Agent1

[View Quote]

Apr 3, 2002, 8:24pm

[View Quote] You can't. If you want your program to use it, it has to be decrypted into
memory sometime.

> I know I left some places in the process that need filling in. I'm not
really shure how you'd accomplish this.

Well, you'd need some sort of secure hardware that could do this sort of
thing, I think.


-Agent1

May 13, 2002, 7:20pm

In 3.3 they also create a hardware-based hash to use for ejecting specific
machines regardless of the citizen number.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

1  ...  7  8  9  10  11  12  ...  31  |   Order by default