|
sw chris // User Search
sw chris // User Search
Sep 30, 2002, 2:41am
Eepishness? I'm sheepish sometimes, but definitely no eep. :) Just trying
to stave off the tidal wave of any further discussion on 'proper grammar'.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"johnny b" <jbitt2ATjuno.com> wrote in message
news:3d95b7ce at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> In the video, you're correct, it should have just been "Activeworlds"
which
> IS the name of the Company/Program ... I was just talking about the " 's
"
> used in possessive nouns.... Christ, the "eepisnness" is contageous in
here
> *shutting up now, b4 I catch it, Hmm may be too late* ;O)
>
> So Pineriver made a typo in it.... does anyone REALLY care ? He did a
nice
> job with it altogether :O)
>
> JB
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
> news:3d948aa8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that
>
>
|
Oct 1, 2002, 6:26pm
US copyright prevents you from using more than 30 seconds from any song or
track. Any more and you must pay royalties.
Chris
[View Quote]"pineriver" <pineriver at thenett.com> wrote in message
news:3d99ee64$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well Since I edited the music I don't think that there would be a problem.
I
> think the music has to be a 20% difference.
>
>
> "de de cyber mom" <DeDe at pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:3d99cb1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
on
> have
>
>
|
Oct 1, 2002, 7:54pm
Oh, btw that is for non-profit use. If AW wants to use these as commercials
and the tracks you used in it are copyrighted, then they have to either get
permission or use different tracks.
However the track I would take, no offense, would be to get some free
airtime on technology shows and networks like TechTV and magazines and
journals as well. In uh, otherwords... actively solicite those shows and
mags to demo and rate your product. That solves the financial issue, I
think. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
news:3d9a04f3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> US copyright prevents you from using more than 30 seconds from any song or
> track. Any more and you must pay royalties.
>
> Chris
>
> "pineriver" <pineriver at thenett.com> wrote in message
> news:3d99ee64$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
problem.
> I
at
after
gate
prices
> on
should
>
>
|
Sep 27, 2002, 2:52pm
I don't seem to recall contradicting opinions ever being called flames. Syn
did flame you, but the least you can do is to stop trying to be saintly and
at least think about why you posted this in the first place instead of
claiming that you will not engage in any flame war. You're just dragging up
muck that has already been passed over. Which is one cause of flame wars of
many if I remember correctly.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:3d937ca7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> syn The only people here wishing to instigate any flames are the people
> that seem to support this event, as we all do and want it to be fairly
> run.... I have no wish to start and flame war as you might wish to
> instigate. My original posting was a simple request for all to see what
the
> situation is at present. It is very evident the ppl who are trying to run
> the CY s and what ppl say and do here, wishes anything that conflicts with
> their own beliefs are to be silenced
> therefore I will not engage in any flame war
> And my information came from AW itself
> therefore researched and confirmed
> "syntax" <syn at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:3d9379e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Personally
like
> GK
you
pick
back
> least
> to
*not*
find
>
>
|
Sep 27, 2002, 3:12pm
And it's so full of propoganda that even the CIA would be proud.
As cringing as it may sound to some readers out there, I for one think that
the Cy Awards could do with a little bit less community involvement, seeing
as what happened this year, I'd just as well want something like the Oscars.
But that would invalidate the awards right there.
Examples...
'Usually though, with programs like this, if people don't like the way it
is,
they can just choose not to participate. In this case, what's odd is that
when you tell them you don't like it and you don't want to participate, they
force you to. (People who attempt to withdraw are told they are not
"allowed" to. Go look at all the signs for all the people who have
withdrawn still up in the new voting center.)"
This is what is referred to as a bureaucracy. They aren't forcing you to
participate, they're just slow and/or someone STILL isn't doing their job.
"Finally, what really sums it up is goob's final statement about people
getting a taste of power. The people who run this awards program have come
to believe that they wield significant power. When pleaded with to be a bit
more open minded and open up the program so that it is more for the
community, they feel threatened because they fear the loss of what they see
as their power."
That certainly is the case for some of the people some of the time, but not
ALL of the people all of the time. Just like in real life. But you're
inadvertantly accusing people like Weebo and Alphabit Phalpha of that, and
that's not right. Because I know them more or less, and in my estimation
they would never delude themselves and let this perceived "power" go to
their heads. Come on people. It's a virtual awards ceremony. Even USA
Today has never heard of it. WHAT POWER!?
Cy Awards, you're not finished after this round. The people in charge need
to start downsizing that committee and delagating out work to _trusted_
individuals. There are what? 50 members? That's way too many. Being that
community oriented just slows things down. There's so many people there
that nobody knows who's doing what because the work is spread _too_ far out.
And if Taun or Weebo could let me know if I've hit the nail on the head as
to why the voting center hasn't been updated yet, that would be great.
My only regret is that I can't help out because of other prior commitments.
Or... to hell with it. Even though I'm not on the committee, this ONE TIME
ONLY, I'll update the voting signs if it doesn't invalidate any nominations
that I have.
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d945989$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Linn, goober is right. The Cy Awards have nothing to do with the
community,
> or with Active Worlds as a whole. It is a private awards program, started
> by, and run by a few people.
>
> I made the same mistake in thinking that this program was at a community
or
> Active Worlds level. It's not. The 'Cy means Community' slogan they use
> apparantly refers only to the fact that they, as goober points out, allow
> the community to vote. Other than that, it has nothing to do with the
> community as a whole that I can see.
>
> Goob is right -- they are free to make up any rules they wish, no matter
how
> crazy. The same as you and I, Linn, could start our own little private
> awards program tomorrow, and we could make up any rules we want.
>
> Usually though, with programs like this, if people don't like the way it
is,
> they can just choose not to participate. In this case, what's odd is that
> when you tell them you don't like it and you don't want to participate,
they
> force you to. (People who attempt to withdraw are told they are not
> "allowed" to. Go look at all the signs for all the people who have
> withdrawn still up in the new voting center.)
>
> Finally, what really sums it up is goob's final statement about people
> getting a taste of power. The people who run this awards program have
come
> to believe that they wield significant power. When pleaded with to be a
bit
> more open minded and open up the program so that it is more for the
> community, they feel threatened because they fear the loss of what they
see
> as their power.
>
> The best thing to do at this point, for the people who want an awards
> program that is fair, equitable, for the community, and recognizes talent,
> instead of just being some odd sort of popularity contest, is to do what
the
> Cy group has done -- start another awards program that *is* geared toward
> the community and *does* recognize talent. Anyone and everyone is free to
> do so.
>
> This is my last post on the topic of the Cy awards.
>
> Kerstin
>
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3D93C88F.2070009 at utn.cjb.net...
with...
wanted
> to
as
> we
> around
that
> we
> lack
already
see
can't
do
> contestants
> their
nothing
>
>
|
Sep 27, 2002, 3:13pm
I dunno... Syntax was a new face. =P
SW Chris
[View Quote]"wizard myrddin" <Hippyring at rdescape.com> wrote in message
news:3d944ddd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> (THIS IS NOT A FLAME)
>
> lol, Its really shown that some people are chosen regardelss of what
subject
> matter they indroduce to aw ng the same people come out of the woodwork to
> flame.
>
> Perhaps you should Hack aw, seem to get more respect from some people.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
> news:3d92afe4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 27, 2002, 3:15pm
You obviously do care, or you wouldn't have posted that. And I'm there
caring right along with you.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"gandalf" <Gandalf at madactor.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d945dde at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> WOULD YOU LOT SHUT UP AND STOP BICKERING!!!!
>
> I try as hard as I can to stay silent in these arguements, but the way
> in which you are talking these days are really getting to me. As Student
> Union President and South Wales rep., I believe in group work, so that
> together we can achieve our full potential. Believe me, its hard work.
> In the 3 years I have been a cit, I have never ever come across any
> major complaints about the CY Awards as I have done this past month. WE
are
> a community. Can we not try and work as one? Yes, the CY Exec. Team made
> some mistakes, but can any of you say you are perfect? I know I can't.
Those
> who have known me for a while know of my mistakes. If everyone was
perfect,
> what a boring place this would be.
> Alot of people are saying that AWC (or whatever its called) will drive
> us into the ground. I disagree. It'll be there very community, US, that'll
> finish us off. HenrikG has the right idea. He "definitly [does] not get
> involved with the coldness of these newsgroups". Do you blame him? Another
> thing...you all complained about Eep. Now look at yourselves! Your getting
> as bad as him.
> I once had respect for those who read and posted on this NG, but these
> days, it makes me feel ashamed to read it. On the matter of the CY's. Give
> the peeps a chance! You've made your complaint, and now nomination's have
> gone in for the new Exec. Team. Patience is a virtue! I personally support
> ANYONE who can stand up and say "I'm doing this event. Come join in".
Bravo
> to you.
> Now, if I have a problem with something or someone, I tell them.
> However, once I tell them, thats it. It does no good to dwell on negative
> matters. If you do have a problem however, try some CONSTRUCTIVE
CRITICISM!
> It goes a long way, and the person you shared the criticism with won't
feel
> so bad. Now, c'mon peeps, enough is enough.
>
> Please feel free to flame. I don't care anymore.
>
> Gandalf
>
>
|
Sep 27, 2002, 3:21pm
Welcome to the Newsgroup! :D
SW Chris
[View Quote]"de de cyber mom" <DeDe at pandora.be> wrote in message
news:3d9449b7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hope not to soon
>
>
>
> "gandalf" <Gandalf at madactor.co.uk> schreef in bericht
> news:3d94169e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
belong?
>
>
|
Oct 2, 2002, 5:10pm
My first reaction to this is.... why are you posting this on the community
newsgroup? We can't do anything about it.
My second reaction to this is... at least you took the time to report it.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3D9A9F14.ED50459A at msn.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> I sent this to AW Abuse, but just in case this bounces, here goes....
>
> BEGIN PASTED MESSAGE:
> =====================
>
> I would like to report a sign which is apparently in violation of the
> ActiveWorlds TOS. It is at 3442N 245E and was created by someone named
> "King Of The Day". This sign advertises a PORN WEBSITE. The URL given
> on the sign is http://www.pornotrap.com/ There is a build near that
> sdign as well, but I can't tell if it's associated in any way with the
> sign (A quick spot check of the build indicates it's NOT).
>
> I tried going to the GET website to fill out a form, but apparently the
> server must be down at the moment. I followed the link from the
> AWcommunity.org website.
>
> I have no vested interest either way in the apparent TOS violation, but
> figured I should let someone know it exists out of respect for the
> person who owns the adjacent build.
>
> I figured you would want to know.... :-)
>
> Cheers for now :-)
>
> Patrick Cook
> pchamster at msn.com
> Denver, Colorado
> ==============END PASTED MESSAGE=========
>
> PC Hamster
>
|
Oct 4, 2002, 1:08am
Sarcasm I sense in you. No newsgroup is perfect. So let's stop complaining
that we're not. We ourselves can do the best to be polite to others, and we
can do a bit of self-policing because let's face it. If the moderator
actively moderated this group a lot of people would be up in arms about
censored posts. I'd hate to have his responsibility. He's deep fried no
matter what he does.
Honestly I'd think this newsgroup would be better off with a little bit of
authority around here. The moderator doesn't have to censor the posts, but
he should read them all and give some textual warnings from time to time.
And if it warrants it, like that porn link up there, that parts of the posts
be edited. And number one thing to keep in mind is... a good moderator
always participates in discussions. That way he doesn't end up looking like
a god from on high. Just make sure its understood that your opinions aren't
the opinions of the company, because that seems to be what you guys over
there in Newburyport are worried about. :)
Now I personally don't know if you can edit posts in a newsgroup, but if the
moderator can't, then that's another good reason for a bulletin board
system. :)
Nobody said this was a democracy. But many folks seem to think it is.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"maki" <maki at awmaki.com> wrote in message
news:3d9cb01a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lethys wrote:
>
> I agree, but it's not possible -- you just have to get used to the people
> who think the world revolves around them in here, you also can't have any
> emotions or opinions, that don't agree with the people in which the world
> revolves around, and don't forget.. some good flaming skills might help.
>
> maki
>
>
|
Oct 6, 2002, 4:11pm
Well... see the first choices would have been e-mail or telegram. Now just
because people tell you there is a better way to do things does not mean
that they lack any sort of courtesy. The best thing you can do for yourself
is be be polite to others, and that is all you should expect from this
newsgroup, or any public forum on the Internet. I, sir, respect you because
you took steps to bring this thing to the PK's attention. Unfortunately you
made mistakes, like many of us do. Take heart in that when you receive any
criticism, and move on. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3D9FA009.990943F9 at msn.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> And you can FORGET about something called POLITENESS and COMMON COURTESY
in
> here as they don't really exist
>
>
> Of course, one could say the same thing about COMMON SENSE too, but, in
this
> case, what recourse (other than email or telegram) would YOU have taken if
> some switch decided to to go down on YOU while trying to get to the GET
form
> web page???
>
> Be honest....
>
> Cheers for now :-)
>
> PC Hamster
>
> maki wrote:
>
people
any
world
>
|
Oct 6, 2002, 4:13pm
http://www.peacekeeper.net/members.htm
SW Chris
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3D9FA3FC.9353C00C at msn.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> goober king wrote:
>
>
> To this, I plea guilty as charged, however.... :-) Looking back in
hindsight, I
> probably should've done something similar to this....
>
>
> Actually, it was AlphaWorld, but still however....
>
>
> Brant reads these NGs and hee's a PK. He just doesn't post very often.
Dunno where
> you got your info. to the contrary...
>
>
> Scouser sent that URL to me in a telegram. I have since bookmarked the
page. :-)
>
rantings...
>
> Duly noted for consideration, but not really needed at this time though.
:-)
> However, as SW Chris pointed out, the tension and the cynicism (sp?) is so
thick in
> this community, you can cut it with a knife (those are MY words in
response to HIS
> observations, which, at least for the most part, I agree with).
>
> Though OTOH....I suppose I'm just as guilty as the next guy when it comes
to
> responses. To this end, I admit that much.
>
> With that said...Cheers for now :-)
>
> PC Hamster
>
|
Oct 6, 2002, 4:14pm
LOL. Nice deflection, GK. :)
Chris
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3DA05FDB.5060308 at utn.cjb.net...
> Thank you for proving that people in here need to get out more. :P
>
> shred wrote:
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> Maybe go to Med School...
> robrod at prism.net
>
|
Oct 7, 2002, 4:43pm
Whoa man, ease up. He was making a joke in response to your joke.
Chris
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3da0f00d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 1. Do you claim to know how much I get out? Do you automatically take your
assumptions or opinions that are based on minimal information for granted?
>
> 2. How is attempting to be be accurate proof of needing to get out more?
Should all people attempting to provide accurate information be sent away on
the order of getting out more?
>
> 3. Did the apex of smartassknowitallness not recognize a smartassknowitall
reply when he saw it?
>
> goober king wrote:
>
|
Oct 7, 2002, 9:00pm
I guess not. =P
Chris
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3DA1F9B5.50609 at utn.cjb.net...
> And he was making a joke in response to my joke in response to his joke.
> (Note response #3) I guess some people don't know Shred in here as well
> as I do. *smirk*
>
> sw chris wrote:
your
granted?
away on
smartassknowitall
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> There's such a thing as being *too* subtle...
> robrod at prism.net
>
|
Oct 8, 2002, 8:24pm
Now that is a cool build. Where is it? : )
SW Chris
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3da233f0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> http://zionworld.virtualave.net/shred/indeed.jpg (181KB)
>
> goober king wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Goober King
> Knows for a fact Shred needs to get out more anyway ;P"
>
|
Oct 4, 2002, 1:11am
Pay no attention to him. :) Thanks for the heads up. BTW guys... THIS is
why people don't post here! :( You take this self-policing thing _too_
far. A little is good, but this is ridiculous.
SW Chris
P is for Politeness. :D
[View Quote]"chiklit" <chiklit at funetwork.net> wrote in message
news:3d9cd4d9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> geese sorry, I didn't know it would take some weirdo to kill 2,000+ people
> just to be important
>
> "ncc 72897" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
> news:3d9cb7ca$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
doesn't
>
>
|
Oct 5, 2002, 6:58pm
Honestly, I think a news report about people being randomly murdered can
slip by. Or have people around here lost their sense if humanity? Come on
guys... lighten up. Even TF.N isn't as bad as this.
Chris
p.s. Don't use capslock... makes it seem like you're shouting. :)
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3D9EC39D.D355D41A at msn.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> Self-Policing is one thing, but Chiklit's post was WAY off topic as it
made NO
> reference to an AW cit.
>
> But I do agree with you that there are times people DO get PICKY (the ATTN
Brant
> thread being a CLASSIC example of this), however this was NOT one of
them...
>
> Just my opinion....Cheers for now everyone :-)
>
> PC Hamster
>
> sw chris wrote:
>
is
_too_
>
|
Oct 9, 2002, 10:48pm
Well put, lioness..
Chris
[View Quote]"lioness." <nobody at nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3da39521 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry you had to be criticized like that. Not all of us are as calloused
and
> cold as some other people in here. There are some people who enjoy picking
> apart posts that they "feel" don't belong in here. They forget the
> definition of "community", whether it concerns an AW cit or not. For all
we
> know, those people who were shot may have been AW citizens or relatives of
a
> citizen. It is not our place to judge these posts. Don't worry chiklit,
your
> heart is in the right place. Just remember that that kind of news usually
> makes its way across the national and international news broadcasts in
most
> homes, not just online. ;-"D
>
>
> "chiklit" <chiklit at funetwork.net> wrote in message
> news:3d9ca0a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
US.
> shooting
> attempting
lettering,
was
> a
pumping
post
> after
killed
Events
cancelled
> interscholastic
> high
>
>
|
Oct 12, 2002, 9:09pm
Thank you strike.
Chris
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3da851f9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *Filter filter*
>
> "ncc 72897" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3da84da9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
there's so
the
Moron.
>
>
|
Oct 9, 2002, 10:47pm
LOL. Welcome! ^_^
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3da397a2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *thwap* general.discussion!
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "wings0nite" <irene at ischaft.com> wrote in message
> news:3da37dab$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Oct 14, 2002, 8:07pm
Given my limited experience in playing around in Nutinmuch's world, I cann
tell you that if everyone has Caretaker on they will be able to fly. In the
World Rights box put your citizen number in there and whoever else you want
to have all rights, and that should hopefully take care of it. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"the game master" <zechariah4 at sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:3daaa4c9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've built a world in which I have restricted flying and going through
> things (other than other Avatars). However, it seems that other citizens
> can do both of these thins in my world.
>
> How can I stop this?
>
>
|
Oct 14, 2002, 8:08pm
a a a hundred and fifty dollars!? O_O
SW Chris
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at iceflare.net> wrote in message
news:3dab394b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No offense but your posts are starting to get annoyed.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723
> AW 3.4 Build: 435
> Brock at iceflare.net
>
> "the game master" <zechariah4 at sprynet.com> wrote in message
> news:3dab36a3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> game
>
>
|
Oct 16, 2002, 3:58pm
Regardless that Robbie's post comes across as... unwelcoming, he is right.
It is very annoying to many people to have to see the same message over
again in all of the newsgroups here.
Now, I certainly don't know what the deal is with your corporation.
Unfortunately many AW citizens are distrusting of businesses, and I think
(mostly) with good reason. So, to verify your claims, could you please post
the link to your most recent SEC filing? It is also suspicious to people
here that there appears to be no catch to all these fabulous prizes. After
all it looks like you're spending cash needlessly without the thought of any
compensation. Clearly not a good business model. Even Monty from Lets Make
a Deal had a catch with everything he gave away. :)
So, if you could enlighten us a bit on those issues, I think that you will
find that you will probably be welcome here. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"robbie" <thetruth at awteen.org> wrote in message
news:3dad9e4a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Stop acting your some well founded company, as long as your a poster on
this
> newsgroup, your an individual, and we don't welcome indivudals with open
> arms thats post their anoyance in every available newsgroup when it only
> bares relevancy for one of them. As J b e l l kindly pointed out, if your
> such a well established company, you would know that you cannot play for
> money on the ineternet unless your over the age of 18. I can supply a link
> to both european and american government websites that state that if you
> like.
>
> -Robbie
>
> "the game master" <zechariah4 at sprynet.com> wrote in message
> news:3dad8f5b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
and
individuals
to
> expected
> we
registered
> Game
offering
> run
>
>
|
Oct 16, 2002, 4:09pm
http://www.dashenterprisesinc.com/thegame/Player_Registry/player_registratio
n.html
You can't sue him.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"agent1" <webmaster at shatteredplattersDOTcom> wrote in message
news:3dadaa7b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Come on now... that's just blatantly false. If something is free to
participate in, there's no risk whatsoever to the participant. How is that
gambling?
>
>
> -Agent1
>
> strike rapier wrote:
infinity.
>
|
Oct 16, 2002, 11:53pm
Kids these days.... Try jumping on someone _else's_ bandwagon and check
things out for yourselves. DASH Enterprises is indeed legitimate. They use
the money advertisers pay to advertise with them to purchase the fabulous
gifts and prices. That is my understanding of it.
Now knock off this horse crap of illegitimate companies. Good grief, he's
not some other company that I know of... I'll give you two guesses.
SW Chris
Oct 25, 2002, 3:46pm
LOL. Sorry, but I have to laugh when I read your comment and then read your
name. =P Ironic, isn't it?
Chris
[View Quote]"scooby doo" <name at company.invalid> wrote in message
news:3db8c3f7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Great haunted house :D
>
>
> "bro" <bro at mail.yhti.net> wrote in message
> news:3db8aa80 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
and
> loaded
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2002, 7:44pm
All Hail the Royal Navy. :D
Chris
[View Quote]"stecloud" <stecloud at fsmail.net> wrote in message
news:3dbf0d01 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I wouldnt mind being isolated from the continent anyway - we fight wars
for
> them, maybe we should take a back seat - i cant think of many wars in
recnet
> history were the UK has been invaded first, or were the UK started the
war -
> correct me if im wrong.
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2002, 12:55am
The logic of survival, my friend, is the core of any sound business plan.
:) There are two types of tourists. Those who primarily build, and those
who primarily chat. Chat tourists are just as content to chat and not
build. So letting them in world without building privs is akin to just
letting them in world. I challenge you to find a solution to find a balance
that will benefit the company and allow Chat and Build tourists to
experience AW. I think AWI would have done it if they could.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3DBCAB5C.CC001ABD at msn.com...
> Hi everyone
>
> brock wrote:
>
rid
>
> I don't see it as getting rid of tourist restrictions. World Owners would
still
> maintain this.
>
>
> I also wouldn't agree here either as there's a way in AWI could let
tourists
> back onto AW, but do so WITHOUT giving them building privs. Problem is,
AWI
> just simply doesn't want to do it.
>
> And because AWI *is* a business, they don't have to do it. It's not a
question
> of logic, Brock.
>
> Just my opinion...Cheers for now everyone :-)
>
> PC Hamster
>
|
Oct 28, 2002, 9:56pm
Well, see, that's the crux. It was never intended as a world to move all
the aw former cities and towns to.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3DBDD10C.2DD6F417 at msn.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> sw chris wrote:
>
plan.
those
balance
>
> Chris....I have a feeling this whole discussion will be moot once New AW
and AW
> 3.4 is rolled out as AWI won't care about the current AW (see Syntax' post
as as
> example) because its so OUTDATED. Problem is, they simply can't move all
our
> cities and towns (at least not very easily) nor does anybody who posts to
these
> NGs want them destroyed either.
>
> I look forward to seeing the New AW once 3.4 is officially rolled out.
:-)
>
> Just my opinion.....Cheers for now everyone :-)
>
> PC Hamster
>
|
|