1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  9  |   Order by default

Apr 16, 2001, 2:10am

The newest 3.1 beta (not available to public yet) allows more than 750
worlds, by using a more than one packet. Well, shouldn't the same happen to
contacts lists in 3.2? Just a thought..

- YP


begin 666 Young Phalpha.vcf
M0D5'24XZ5D-!4D0-"E9%4E-)3TXZ,BXQ#0I..E!H86QP:&$[66]U;F<[.TUR
M+ at T*1DXZ66]U;F< at 4&AA;'!H80T*3DE#2TY!344Z65 -"D%$4CM(3TU%.CL[
M.TUI9&1L971O=VX[36%R>6QA;F0[,C$W-CD[56YI=&5D(%-T871E<PT*3$%"
M14P[2$]-13M%3D-/1$E.1SU154]4140M4%))3E1!0DQ%.DUI9&1L971O=VXL
M($UA<GEL86YD(#(Q-S8Y/3!$/3!!56YI=&5D(%-T871E<PT*6"U704(M1T5.
M1$52.C(-"D5-04E,.U!2148[24Y415).150Z>7! ;7ER=&AC;RYC;VT-"E)%
?5CHR,# Q,#0Q-E0P-#(W-#9:#0I%3D0Z5D-!4D0-" at ``
`
end

Apr 16, 2001, 2:05pm

or just double it and wait till we have compliants for even more which would
be a while :)

- YP

[View Quote]

Aug 31, 2001, 6:54pm

That's quite impossible, maybe you did it using the upgrade mechanism? If so, D3D will be the
default, for new installations (downloading awb[xx].exe) will start in software. There's a
slight chance I could be wrong, slight :)
--

Young Phalpha

[View Quote] and i know im not in beta bnut the grid thing was
a good idea but how its used is very poor you
should be able to decide whether the grid overlaps
the objects or not... with the way it is now i
dont find it very useful at all

[View Quote]

Aug 31, 2001, 7:47pm

So since when did you own the AW browser? If they have access to the software, on beta list or
not, they are welcome to do so I believe. Its all in in the first amendment! Freedom of Speech!
(USA, that is, but that is where AW operates at...)

--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] -Agent1

[View Quote]

Sep 3, 2001, 2:48am

uhh, you mean the difference of 150-300 milliseconds or so is that much? :)
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Sep 3, 2001, 11:59pm

that's odd, I have a 56k, hmmm... :/
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Sep 12, 2001, 7:40pm

That's the best wish ever seen on the NG wishlist so far :)
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote]

Dec 4, 2001, 9:47pm

ohhh like on Jurassic Park, they have those cool computer folder navigation :D

[View Quote] -Baron


[View Quote]

Dec 8, 2001, 3:34am

12 would be sufficient :)

[View Quote] --Bowen-

[View Quote]

Dec 9, 2001, 2:42pm

if you want it implanted then email AW a lot :)

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Jan 13, 2002, 6:17am

Unmentioned in the newsletter about 3.3, but Roland said 3.3 supports 500 max contacts :)

[View Quote]

Jan 13, 2002, 6:06am

you could use prelighting if its not in a public building world :)

[View Quote]

Mar 28, 2002, 6:53am

because hardware lighting didn't support black...

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Jun 7, 2002, 9:09pm

I find it better, because if you are typing a long message and people are talking outloud, you
can still talk in chat without having to copy and close the window and reopen and paste or
finish typing it...

- YP

[View Quote] (from Will Geraghty)

Telegram window: This nows does not stop you from
using the rest of the AW
browser, you may just have to click on it.

obviously they arent gonna bother even attempting to fix this... i would
appreciate it if more people would complain about this. i know im not the
only one having problems cause people have said stuff to me that werent
meant for me (and sometimes i would have rather NOT heard it)

Jun 8, 2002, 2:11pm

ummm, I find it goes to the telegram window by default for me as soon as the window opens...

- YP

[View Quote]

Jun 28, 2002, 11:09am

Well, Flagg claims he is banning people, I sent an email to him, below is his reply (with my
original text as well):

Hi Rhane,

Thank you for taking the time to bring these posts to my attention.

It is impossible for us, at this time, to monitor every post in every NG and
we rely on people like yourself to point out to us the ones we miss. If
possible please let me know the specific NG these posts are listed under and
the headings of each thread. Thank you.


Sincerely

Tom Fournier
Customer Service / Sales Manager
Activeworlds.com Inc.
95 Parker St.
Newburyport, MA 01950

www.activeworlds.com

*(PLEASE INCLUDE ALL PREVIOUS DIALOG IN ALL REPLIES TO ENSURE A FAST AND
ACCURATE RESPONSE)*

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rhane Colwell" <RhaneC at msn.com>
To: <abuse at activeworlds.com>; <tom at activeworlds.com>
Cc: <insanity at heartfall.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Abuse towards Insanity/Filmkr in NG's


Perhaps the rules stating about newsgroup bans should be done, not preached.
Insanity has been personally attacked. Below is my proof. I would appreciate
it if something was done.

<< not posting names of examples given >>

Of course there is more, but I won't read every message, it is your job to
keep up to date with the NG's.
Rhane C. Colwell

Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com

Jun 28, 2002, 12:06pm

You know, the community has quite a bit more member than just the people posting on your side of
the debate. If Insanity was voted in, then the majority of the community appreciates his honesty
and contributions, and thought he was an legitimate, unbiased, and prudent judge. Stop saying,
or inferring in your context, that the whole community thinks he was dishonest when it is
absolutely a complete lie and is slanderous.

- YP

[View Quote] When Alpha anounced the committee members list I thought it was
inappropriate that Insanity be included considering his most recent
defrauding of a community member. I simply asked that Alpha reconsider his
participation in the hope that it not smear the cyawards. This was not a
private "war" but a genuine concern for the community ... when people
defended the guys actions it was only reasonable I explain why I thought
what I thought ... the thread then evolved. This is not a war ... its due
process.

Do you also feel that people are not entitled to an opinion if it disagrees
with yours? Gee I'm sorry if you find that annoying but that's life ... get
used to it ... it'd be a damn boring place if we all agreed on everything.

I do not understand what you mean by "give it an own thread" ... that's
precisely what it had AND in the relevant forum. This forum is not
appropriate for this discussion and I'd ask you to take it back there for
your comments. If you say something about a person, expect they have the
right to reply. Other than that there's not much else I can say.

Glitter

(on holiday and posting via dial up(yuk) so cant reply as quick as before)

[View Quote]

Jun 28, 2002, 12:36pm

Being a part of the community should mean that you participate in votes such as that too.

- YP

[View Quote] -Agent1

[View Quote]

Jun 30, 2002, 8:16pm

Objects past the maximum fog distance are simply not rendered. :)

- YP

[View Quote] --
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
A message from Zeo Toxion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Jul 1, 2002, 1:47am

I'm not sure about that, maybe certain cards don't render beyond the maximum fog point, I know
mine does not appear to..

- YP

[View Quote] --
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
A message from Zeo Toxion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[View Quote]

Jul 1, 2002, 4:07pm

maybe the browser isn't, but DirectX / Render might be ;) I was saying that based off my frame
:) Btw, they did discover a bug if you set your min/max vis to the same but they had fixed it in
3.4, it only occurred in DX8 and 7 for me and Shamus though, OGL crashed me, and Software worked
like in 3.2...

- YP

[View Quote] > Objects past the maximum fog distance are simply not rendered. :)

I wouldn't think that the browser is smart enough to do that. If it hasn't
been intentionally programmed NOT to render beyond the fog, it will render
it, but not actually display it. You'd have to ask Young Shamus about that,
but it would be a quick fix to not let the visibility go beyond max fog.
*still waiting for backface culling*

KAH

Jul 18, 2002, 8:45pm

the US only owns that atomic clock.. the program apparently works for all timezones (I downloaded it myself).. it works nice I
think..

- YP

[View Quote]

Jul 19, 2002, 2:13am

hahaha... I don't really care about spyware ;)

- YP

[View Quote]

Oct 10, 2005, 12:45am

Achievable - no, AW does not have its own FTP features, and (from very tight
sources of information, of course) is not going to any time soon.
However, an almost-as-good workaround would be to make (or have someone else
make) a path-specific webpage with a password and browse button to upload
files directly to the OP

--
- Rhane Colwell (RhaneColwell at msn.com)

[View Quote]

Oct 19, 2005, 9:41pm

Something like a movement speed value inside the avatar.dat would be pretty
nice to have...

Jul 24, 2006, 5:13pm

I think improved collision detection is really needed. If I'm correct, the
current model works by checking all objects in view. Very bad!! Instead,
it should only check collision with objects that are close by, by excluding
those whose distance is greater than the maximum X/Z extent of the object +
maximum X/Z extent of the avatar. Comments welcome!

- YP

Jul 27, 2006, 10:37pm

http://help.activeworlds.com/aw41/document.php?personal_avatar

- YP

[View Quote]

Sep 3, 2001, 2:48am

uhh, you mean the difference of 150-300 milliseconds or so is that much? :)
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Sep 3, 2001, 11:59pm

that's odd, I have a 56k, hmmm... :/
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Sep 3, 2001, 3:06am

Nornny, stop freaking out!!! :)
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] Apologizing just made you look like a bigger idiot and it's not going to
help you now. Just STOP! Post intelligently and with good discretion. Don't
post anything you CAN'T get help from in AW, don't post ANYTHING personal,
and if that means not posting, well, don't post. It's not a requirement, and
you probably will have a better "status" (isn't that what you're looking
for, to be accepted?) in the community than if you DO post stupid things
like that here.

Nornny

[View Quote]

1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  9  |   Order by default