|
young phalpha // User Search
young phalpha // User Search
Jun 25, 2002, 9:23pm
Exactly, thats why I told you a reread it and realized you did say it in opinion
- YP
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3d18f97c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
*sigh* Quick English lesson. The "in my opinion" applied to the part of the sentence describing
him as not being trustworthy.
|
-Agent1
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message news:3d18f840 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, if he has such this bad reputation, why was he voted in by the community? For the "I
> think" part I reread your post and read that you had "in my opinion" on the end...
|
Jun 25, 2002, 9:24pm
doh, next to the end "I can convincing" is meant to be "I am convincing" [trying to]
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message news:3d18faff at server1.Activeworlds.com...
then what was the point in announcing you were boycotting the Cy Awards in the first place? What
real reason are you boycotting him and what he deals with? Is that reason based off of what you
heard or what you know, or a fact? If it is not something you know, saw, or is a fact, then
there is no reason in boycotting it. I know it is your decision to boycott it and all, but like
I said, I can convincing you not to...
|
- YP
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3d18f6d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I'm not boycotting it based on that, ask ambivalent. I told her I was
boycotting the event because of filmkr long before he posted that comment.
She asked me to model, and that's what I responded with.
|
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d18f032 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm trying to convince you not to boycott it, its stupid to boycott
something just because
> Filmkr said someone needed an education to realize something so simple and
logical, I don't care
> what upbringing you have, you should be able to realize what Filmkr stated
without thought
>
> - YP
>
> "bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3d18ee3d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't even know what you're talking about right now. You took what I
said
> far out of context as Agent1 said. If johnnyb doesn't have the same
> perforated morals you do, sorry, but it's still common sense to him to do
> what he does. Not everyone shares similar upbrinngings, some of us are
more
> apt to voice our opinions and say what we think than others.
>
> If you don't like my reason for boycotting it, so be it. It's not your
> decision to make. Maybe I think your fighting me on this just to fight is
a
> stupid reason? It's all relative. I really don't care what you think of
me
> or why you think it, despite what I say or do, you'll still think that
way.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d18e498 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I
> suggest you get an
lack
> of common sense
> Filmkr said, yet
Cy's.
> news:3d18e308 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
have
> no idea where you got
> overreacting like you did
a
> newsgroup argument is
> news:3d18de51 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> medical advances for
> surgery, doesn't sound
> coronary or heart surgery is
> Cy's just because of
> you in telegram your
> The
mental
ill
> everyone
> not
> this.
that
>
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2002, 12:20am
What has he said that is so bad?
- YP
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3d190caf$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Because of everything he's said, and it's been brought to my attention that
he was part of the committee. I made it clear to myself, that I would not
participate in anything that he was (special circumstances forthcoming).
The CY's do not fall into any special circumstances. I've never even
particpated in them before, and this has put me off even more on the idea.
The point of announcing it so others would know. Perhaps it will help them
realize he has some major faults, perhaps not. Only time will tell.
|
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d18faff at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> then what was the point in announcing you were boycotting the Cy Awards in
the first place? What
> real reason are you boycotting him and what he deals with? Is that reason
based off of what you
> heard or what you know, or a fact? If it is not something you know, saw,
or is a fact, then
> there is no reason in boycotting it. I know it is your decision to boycott
it and all, but like
> I said, I can convincing you not to...
>
> - YP
>
> "bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3d18f6d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm not boycotting it based on that, ask ambivalent. I told her I was
> boycotting the event because of filmkr long before he posted that comment.
> She asked me to model, and that's what I responded with.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d18f032 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> something just because
and
> logical, I don't care
stated
> without thought
> said
do
> more
is
> a
of
> me
> way.
"Might
> I
> lack
what
> Cy's.
> have
on
> a
the
the
to
> mental
> ill
will
to
> that
>
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2002, 3:05pm
I know Insanity as a friend, he and everyone else willing to donate and helps the community
forthright should be allowed to judge the community, just as anyone else. But "let in" was my 2
word equivalent of you saying "only highlighting some associations. You know it makes me wonder
how insanity got those past CYawards". In what way does he lack credibility and integrity? I'm
hopefully looking for fact reasons, or personal encounters. If one of them is about ambivalent
not getting her refund, well, it was mentioned in the contract only 30 days for a refund, and a
business should go by the contract they set out, so that reason isn't valid as to lower his
credibility and integrity.
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d193fac at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I never said he was "let in" by association ... I even specifically
mentioned the vote may be skewed or misrepresentative, but I recognised it
was a vote nonetheless in my response to Goober King. Please get your facts
straight. I have repeatedly claimed that he lakes credibility and integrity
and should be removed .... I have questioned why, seval times, such an
individual gets to stay in ... judging by all the bad stuff this guy has
done "it leads you to wonder" what's in it for Alpha ... I don't know much
about you YP so I cant comment on your talent ... I know an enormous amount
about Insanity ... and while I dont question his right to be a member of the
community, I do question his right to judge it fairly ... that's it plain
and simple.
|
Glitter
[View Quote]young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d18f6b3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, business is a place where everything is agreed to on paper, sorry,
but if you encounter a
> hoster problem after 30 days and you can't get your refund, only thing you
can do is contact the
> better business bureau, if that was done we could truly know his
credibility, but going by fact,
> he's a good man who is not prejudice towards people. My post was about how
Glitter Kitty was
> accusing Filmkr by being "let in" by association, not being voted in
(although my personal
> example was her letting me in by my personal talents and will to work with
a community
> organization, not by being voted in, but nonetheless to show integrity of
the organization
> itself) as it had happened.
>
> - YP
>
> "johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3d18f3a8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> YP,
>
> Thats quite respectable from someone your age...... I'm impressed .....
I'd think, seeing how
> you
> will "stand up for your beliefs" You, perhaps, would understand why we
stand up for OURS......
> and
> the "age" statement just now was NOT meant in any derogatory way.....
Just, I'm probably twice
> your
> age and see so few teenagers with any type of maturity level worth
mentioning these days.....
> apparently you arent one of them, and thats a good thing.....
>
> You see, " I " believe that if someone TRUSTS you and gives you their
MONEY for a service or
> product, you have a responsibility to DELIVER said goods...... if not,
return the money and
> part
> ways......when you abuse that trust, you undermine any good that might
have ever been associated
> with you in the past...... You see, If I took my customers' money and
then never finished the
> job
> and refused to return the witheld amount, I'd end my butt up in
court..... needless to say,
> I'd
> pretty much destroy my and my business' future and reputation.... AND the
respect my customers
> and
> peers have in me, understand ?
>
> What it boils down to, is this...... I have no respect for ANYONE who
bilks people out of their
> hard earned money..... period....... And I WILL voice my opinion when I
see such
> occuring........
> people come to AW, to make new friends and have fun.....not to be ripped
off and have their
> enjoyment trampled on like so much garbage by self righteous arrogant
thugs.....
>
> Hopefully you can understand MY point of view...... I do have a right to
express it after
> all.....
>
> JB
>
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2002, 3:15pm
How can you say the Cy's have no credibility in the eyes of many? Count the people who have
pounced on Insanity for his business practice, its only 15 or so people, the Cy's attract an
attendance of 200-300 people. AlphaBit needs to do nothing to restore the credibility of the
Cy's, it's still there except for this 15 or so people, and all she and the rest of the
community can do to fix that is to show you the facts, facts count more than word of mouth.
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d193e3f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I can't see why he should even bring up that he went to hospital in the
first place unless he's trying to get sympathy to soften the backlash
against his fraudulent business practices. I know one person involved in
this debate in the last few days who did it from hospital but I dont see
them trying to use it to win sympathy. I believe it was filmkr that said
insanity was in hospital and we should all feel sorry for him ... seeing as
they are the same person its obvious he intends to lie about one thing ...
so why not the other ... as I keep saying, this is a credibility issue. The
Cyawards no longer have credibility in the eyes of many ... I desperately
hope Alpha does something to restore this credibility ... but somehow I
doubt she will.
|
Glitter
[View Quote]young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d18f13b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Just because he had a 2 day rest in the hospital after a coronary surgery
is very possible, so
> unless you still believed he faked going to the hospital, tell me what the
"smoke" is that needs
> to be seen through
>
> - YP
>
> "johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3d18ee24$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Precisely MY point...... Glad there's a few in here that can see through
the smoke..
>
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2002, 3:33pm
First of all, the Cy's committee is over 40-50 people, it's truly a great event in the end and
has been for years. It is one of the most stable community events, one person you believe is
dishonest you believe is in the committee will not affect it. Several community organizations
have people in them who the majority of people think is dishonest, but the event itself turns
out a honest event. Insanity is a fully trustworthy and honest person, he donates objects to the
community, and volunteered to help in the Cy's. I see nothing dishonest associated with
Insanity, he got accused of stealing an avatar, in which the person said they were taking
Insanity to court, well where's the outcome of this? If there were an outcome besides his
innocence, then maybe that would qualify as a dishonest factor. He ejected someone from a world
for 5 minutes, the owner demands refund after 30 days, says her money was taken, and feels she
doesn't own her world anymore, if you think ejecting someone for 5 minutes from a world you host
is a qualifying dishonest factor, then so be it.
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d193ccf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
There is absolutely every reason to boycott something you don't believe is
credible. Why would a person support something they believed was being
influenced by dishonesty unless they has some personal agenda invested. Most
people like to see things involving the community run with credibility and
integrity ... the whole reason I raised this issue in the first place ...
the last several days of posts indicate to me that the CYawards committee is
standing by someone they know to be astoundingly dishonest and fraudulent
.... I do not only believe in boycotting such a process but encouraging
others to do exactly the same until the dishonesty is removed/fixed. It
occurs in every other public forum in the world ... why should it not apply
here?
|
Glitter
[View Quote]young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d18f032 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm trying to convince you not to boycott it, its stupid to boycott
something just because
> Filmkr said someone needed an education to realize something so simple and
logical, I don't care
> what upbringing you have, you should be able to realize what Filmkr stated
without thought
>
> - YP
>
> "bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3d18ee3d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't even know what you're talking about right now. You took what I
said
> far out of context as Agent1 said. If johnnyb doesn't have the same
> perforated morals you do, sorry, but it's still common sense to him to do
> what he does. Not everyone shares similar upbrinngings, some of us are
more
> apt to voice our opinions and say what we think than others.
>
> If you don't like my reason for boycotting it, so be it. It's not your
> decision to make. Maybe I think your fighting me on this just to fight is
a
> stupid reason? It's all relative. I really don't care what you think of
me
> or why you think it, despite what I say or do, you'll still think that
way.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d18e498 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I
> suggest you get an
lack
> of common sense
> Filmkr said, yet
Cy's.
> news:3d18e308 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
have
> no idea where you got
> overreacting like you did
a
> newsgroup argument is
> news:3d18de51 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> medical advances for
> surgery, doesn't sound
> coronary or heart surgery is
> Cy's just because of
> you in telegram your
> The
mental
ill
> everyone
> not
> this.
that
>
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2002, 7:37pm
Perhaps you've not met him in person, he does have morals and is a decent man, in what way did
he take money? If his client asked for a refund after 30 days, yet in contract it stated no
refund after 30 days, then well, it is simply the client's fault. I don't believe anyone has
lost any money in him, except for one person, but it was their own fault. So therefore, he is
not a crook.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d18ed85$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Funny..... I don't seem to remember spilling forth any "ill will"..... just stating my opinion
on
your repeated altercations with people here...... seems to me, there've been WAY too many in the
past year and a half that I've been posting here..... You talk about morals, decency, blah blah
blah...... might be time to PRACTICE that which you preach so adamantly, my friend..... taking
people's money and not delivering that which was PAID for, sure doesn't qualify as ANY of these
attributes in MY book..... Nor many other's I'd dare say.....
|
I also seem to remember inquiring as to your health, as I'm not a sadistic person and don't wish
anyone ill health..... I also asked you to back up your claims of this "serious cardiac
surgery"
with some manner of proof.... As, Honestly, You've quite a track record of half and untruths
here...... Hell, I even offered to not make another post AND post an apology, had you proven you
were ACTUALLY ill..... I wish no ill on ANY person.... But alas, you never responded to
THAT...... perhaps there was no way you COULD....... BTW, I dont give a hoot about the Vice
Secretary, Dick Cheney....... HE is a man with impeccable credentials and DEMONSTRATED morals
and
maturity........ you on the other hand...... well, lets just count all the dollars that
people
have lost involving you....
Also........ Hate is a pretty harsh word there Lars...... I never alluded to "hating"
you........ I
just think you're a crook....... ( allegedly, of course)
Oh yes...... almost forgot....... I'm not a kid, genius...... in case you forgot from the LAST
bunch of nastiness you posted here..... (might wanna read back some and refresh your failing
memory)
I'm 33 years old, and an electrician / datacom systems installer..... but I suppose my MANY
YEARS
of schooling don't count as an education, huh ?? Maybe if I work real hard I can host worlds
and
make gor sequences and be an actor sometimes.....
Save your presumptuous egotistical crap for someone here who MIGHT be impressed...... or just
blinded by your smoke screens, attention shifting antics, and generally outrageous self
aggrandizations.......
And If you WERE ill....... I sincerely hope you're feeling better...... I'd assume you were,
since you can write posts like that.....
Jun 26, 2002, 7:38pm
Too bad its something you cant live with, but cant live without... lol
- YP
[View Quote]"barbarae" <barbeisner at msn.com> wrote in message news:3d1a2ba9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Politics! I absolutely loathe Politics!
|
I've already seen Politics almost ruin one chat program (and kill an
otherwise originally very worthy organization in that same program).
Regardless of what side you are on, or what your opinion you may have, let's
not let Politics destroy Active Worlds!
Barbara of Amberlin
aka Barbara Eisner aka Barbarae
Jun 26, 2002, 8:44pm
If such is true, you can send him to court, or contact the better business bureau, if you don't,
then it's merely words, since you and Insanity have conflicting stories, if you take him to
court and win, you'll get more believers of his so-called fraudulent business practices
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1a42cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
what i demanded a refund of is the $160 i paid him in advance for 5 avatars,
which he never delivered. he refuses to refund my money, and he refuses to
deliver the avatars. that's more than a 'dishonest factor' -- that's a
crime -- it's called fraud.
|
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d19face at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Insanity is a fully trustworthy and honest person,
|
Jun 27, 2002, 4:00am
Well, BBE is free to complain to, and ambivalent told me that, but of course you need a
response - I just emailed her and asked if she did got any response, my guess is she didn't yet.
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d1a8a44 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Is it worth sending someone to court for $160? Practically speaking it
usually isnt. The US justice dept did a survey on this a few years back
(sorry I dont have a URL for it) whereby they discovered that almost 50% of
the population had at some stage in the 10 year sample period been defrauded
of up to $500 and failed to prosecute because of the difficulty involved ...
it simply wasnt worth it. So YP, just because fraud isnt challenged doesnt
mean it didnt happen ... 1 in 2 people here (statistically speaking) with be
defrauded just like ambivalent. The catch (wait for it) was that most of the
sample surveyed stated they had found their 'revenge' by other means, most
typically advertising the fraud in the community some how .... isnt it funny
how some things never change!! Gotta love how the USA works.
|
regards
Glitter in Australia
[View Quote]young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1a43df at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If such is true, you can send him to court, or contact the better business
bureau, if you don't,
> then it's merely words, since you and Insanity have conflicting stories,
if you take him to
> court and win, you'll get more believers of his so-called fraudulent
business practices
>
> - YP
>
> "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d1a42cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what i demanded a refund of is the $160 i paid him in advance for 5
avatars,
> which he never delivered. he refuses to refund my money, and he refuses
to
> deliver the avatars. that's more than a 'dishonest factor' -- that's a
> crime -- it's called fraud.
>
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d19face at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Insanity is a fully trustworthy and honest person,
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 4:14am
First of all, litter kitty (thanks AlphaBit!), I am a guy, second, I wouldn't defend evil.
Insanity says that the hosting AND sale of products could not be refunded due to the 30 day
refund policy. Ambi says [I think?] it was less than 30 days, therefore she contacted the BBE. A
response from the BBE, or some other form a proof. Do they have innocence before PROVEN guilty
in Australia? Well, seems in the NG's it is innocence before rumored guilty. I am simply saying,
and my reason for defending Insanity, is that he is innocent! Now, give some proof (valid
non-word-of-mouth-or-a-persons-story kind of proof), which would prove, that he may be guilty.
If it appears he his guilty, I wouldn't think that me defending him made me look like an idiot,
I would nonetheless feel proud I defended innocence before proven guilty which exists in my
country (USA).
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d1a824b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP doesnt see that as stealing because it was not her who he stole from ...
you will always find people who will support a 'friend' no matter how evil
their actions have been to other people ... they just dont want to believe
their 'friend' could have stooped so low ... and yes, ambivalent, what he
did was stealing ... he is required, by law, to deliver on the contract paid
for if he doesnt wish to give you a refund ... We've all seen the way he
treated Paul in your chat room ... I wouldn't hold your breath for that
refund!
|
YP is confusing the hosting with the sale of products ... two seperate rip
off events YP ... read the story before you defend the criminal.
[View Quote]ambivalent <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d1a42cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what i demanded a refund of is the $160 i paid him in advance for 5
avatars,
> which he never delivered. he refuses to refund my money, and he refuses
to
> deliver the avatars. that's more than a 'dishonest factor' -- that's a
> crime -- it's called fraud.
>
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d19face at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Insanity is a fully trustworthy and honest person,
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 6:15am
Let me make an example... Bob's Birdhouses makes birdhouses. Bob's birdhouses has a contract
stating no refunds after 30 days. You order a custom birdhouse. You are told it will take 45-60
days. When the birdhouse is done, the Bob steps on a roach. You then cancel your birdhouse and
want a refund, well, can't get a refund according to contract. You lose money because you got
pissed off for Bob stepping on a cockroach.
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d1ac16e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP you seem to forget that both ambi and insanity agree that the monies were
taken and the avs not delivered ... there is no heresay .... they both agree
.... why cant you see that. Insanity, however, says thats his right under his
policy. The law does not agree with his interpretation. Its quite simple and
extremely tested in law ... no heresay or opinion ... plain and simple
business law. Virtually any business law book you pick up will be able to
verify this if you have the time and are truely interested in understanding
the reality of business practice. There is no presumption of inocence
required. His own admission of process is outside that of law ... he just
wishes to contest that ... unfortunately its well documented as not
contestable and he wouldnt be able to defend it. So yes quite clearly you
are standing up for someone who has broken the law (whether knowingly or
not). I would ask that you take the time to read up on the basic aspects of
contract law so you understand how I am entitled to make these statements.
|
(G)litter
[View Quote]young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1aad3d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> First of all, litter kitty (thanks AlphaBit!), I am a guy, second, I
wouldn't defend evil.
> Insanity says that the hosting AND sale of products could not be refunded
due to the 30 day
> refund policy. Ambi says [I think?] it was less than 30 days, therefore
she contacted the BBE. A
> response from the BBE, or some other form a proof. Do they have innocence
before PROVEN guilty
> in Australia? Well, seems in the NG's it is innocence before rumored
guilty. I am simply saying,
> and my reason for defending Insanity, is that he is innocent! Now, give
some proof (valid
> non-word-of-mouth-or-a-persons-story kind of proof), which would prove,
that he may be guilty.
> If it appears he his guilty, I wouldn't think that me defending him made
me look like an idiot,
> I would nonetheless feel proud I defended innocence before proven guilty
which exists in my
> country (USA).
>
> - YP
>
> "glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3d1a824b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> YP doesnt see that as stealing because it was not her who he stole from
....
> you will always find people who will support a 'friend' no matter how evil
> their actions have been to other people ... they just dont want to believe
> their 'friend' could have stooped so low ... and yes, ambivalent, what he
> did was stealing ... he is required, by law, to deliver on the contract
paid
> for if he doesnt wish to give you a refund ... We've all seen the way he
> treated Paul in your chat room ... I wouldn't hold your breath for that
> refund!
>
> YP is confusing the hosting with the sale of products ... two seperate rip
> off events YP ... read the story before you defend the criminal.
>
> ambivalent <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
> news:3d1a42cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> avatars,
> to
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 5:51pm
Insanity told me he said it would take 6 or so weeks to finish the avatars, if which is true,
and you sent your money in advance after you ordered and after 30 days, regardless of how long
it took to make them, if it was after 30 days, and you cancelled, you can't really expect a
refund and he told me he was almost finished them.
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1afbf8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
no, let's use this example. bob makes birdhouses. bob has a contract
stating delivery upon receipt. bob tells you it will take one week to
deliver your birdhouse. you order 5 custom birdhouses. you wait 6 weeks.
bob never makes the birdhouses. bob refuses to tell you when he will give
you the birdhouses. bob tells you he will give you a refund because he's
not about to rush to make your birdhouses. you finally tell bob you want
the refund he offered. bob tells you he doesn't like the way you asked for
the refund he offered, and that he's not making you any birdhouses, and not
giving you back your money. bob has defrauded you.
|
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1ac991 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Let me make an example... Bob's Birdhouses makes birdhouses. Bob's
birdhouses has a contract
> stating no refunds after 30 days. You order a custom birdhouse. You are
told it will take 45-60
> days. When the birdhouse is done, the Bob steps on a roach. You then
cancel your birdhouse and
> want a refund, well, can't get a refund according to contract. You lose
money because you got
> pissed off for Bob stepping on a cockroach.
>
> - YP
>
> "glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3d1ac16e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> YP you seem to forget that both ambi and insanity agree that the monies
were
> taken and the avs not delivered ... there is no heresay .... they both
agree
> ... why cant you see that. Insanity, however, says thats his right under
his
> policy. The law does not agree with his interpretation. Its quite simple
and
> extremely tested in law ... no heresay or opinion ... plain and simple
> business law. Virtually any business law book you pick up will be able to
> verify this if you have the time and are truely interested in
understanding
> the reality of business practice. There is no presumption of inocence
> required. His own admission of process is outside that of law ... he just
> wishes to contest that ... unfortunately its well documented as not
> contestable and he wouldnt be able to defend it. So yes quite clearly you
> are standing up for someone who has broken the law (whether knowingly or
> not). I would ask that you take the time to read up on the basic aspects
of
> contract law so you understand how I am entitled to make these statements.
>
> (G)litter
>
>
> young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d1aad3d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> wouldn't defend evil.
refunded
> due to the 30 day
> she contacted the BBE. A
innocence
> before PROVEN guilty
> guilty. I am simply saying,
> some proof (valid
> that he may be guilty.
> me look like an idiot,
> which exists in my
> ...
evil
believe
he
> paid
rip
refuses
a
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 6:02pm
What the hell are you talking about? It was after 30 days, Insanity was almost finished them. If
Insanity had given a refund he himself would have lost time and money. Insanity said he would
finished them regardless if she cancelled. Regardless of your consumer guidebook crap, there are
laws protecting business's too, a judge would look at this and be on Insanity's side. Most
business's doing custom products require you send in money before work starts.
- YP
[View Quote]"glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d1ad427 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
wonderful sidestep but sorry the analogy is not parallel ... the law is
quite clear as much as you dont like how it might be applied. I cant teach
you law and no doubt you dont want to know how it applies to this case so
I'm afraid no matter what I say it wont change your opinion. You asked for
fact I gave you exactly what both parties agreed on, you said guilt versus
innocence so I gave you the applicable laws ... I'm sorry YP but if you
truely wish to believe this man has committed no breech of contract then
nothing will convince you otherwise. Please do pick yourself up a consumer
guidebook in the very least next time you are out shopping ... ignorance of
the law is no excuse for siding with someone who breaks the law. It really
is that simple.
|
[View Quote]young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1ac991 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Let me make an example... Bob's Birdhouses makes birdhouses. Bob's
birdhouses has a contract
> stating no refunds after 30 days. You order a custom birdhouse. You are
told it will take 45-60
> days. When the birdhouse is done, the Bob steps on a roach. You then
cancel your birdhouse and
> want a refund, well, can't get a refund according to contract. You lose
money because you got
> pissed off for Bob stepping on a cockroach.
>
> - YP
>
> "glitter kitty" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3d1ac16e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> YP you seem to forget that both ambi and insanity agree that the monies
were
> taken and the avs not delivered ... there is no heresay .... they both
agree
> ... why cant you see that. Insanity, however, says thats his right under
his
> policy. The law does not agree with his interpretation. Its quite simple
and
> extremely tested in law ... no heresay or opinion ... plain and simple
> business law. Virtually any business law book you pick up will be able to
> verify this if you have the time and are truely interested in
understanding
> the reality of business practice. There is no presumption of inocence
> required. His own admission of process is outside that of law ... he just
> wishes to contest that ... unfortunately its well documented as not
> contestable and he wouldnt be able to defend it. So yes quite clearly you
> are standing up for someone who has broken the law (whether knowingly or
> not). I would ask that you take the time to read up on the basic aspects
of
> contract law so you understand how I am entitled to make these statements.
>
> (G)litter
>
>
> young phalpha <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d1aad3d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> wouldn't defend evil.
refunded
> due to the 30 day
> she contacted the BBE. A
innocence
> before PROVEN guilty
> guilty. I am simply saying,
> some proof (valid
> that he may be guilty.
> me look like an idiot,
> which exists in my
> ...
evil
believe
he
> paid
rip
refuses
a
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 6:09pm
Insanity told me he would finish them regardless if she cancelled, so maybe he just might.
- YP
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
news:3d1b1781$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
ok I'm done pondering....hehehhehe just a thought here.....
Filmkr....If you are not returning the moneys cause you've put too much time
into the avatars....then why not just give them to her since they must be
almost complete? it makes no sense to say "I've put too much time into
them to refund her money", then have nothing to show for your time. This
just stikes me as questionable.
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3D1AA23C.DC09D183 at privacy.com...
Simply because there are several who continue to try and terrorize others
and post lies here to attempt many harm, I will post the facts below.
1. Never refused a refund ever. There are users who have received refunds
from us within the 30 days. This disgruntle party here was never refused a
refund. They were simply pointed to the 30 day refund policy.
2. No one here ever refused to deliver any avatars. The fact is that the
disgruntle party sent an e-mail and a telegram stating that she "Canceled"
her avatar request and stated she did not want them sent to her. This
cancellation was well beyond the 30 day time window and a large amount of
work was already performed on the order which she approved of.
3. We are not obligated to ever refund anyone's money when irrational
hysteria is the basis of the request.
Enough said already...
Hoping that people will find some peace, health & healing ...
Tip for the day... go get some sun light...
Filmkr & InSaNiTy
One and the Same, as it's always been stated throughout history...
|
what i demanded a refund of is the $160 i paid him in advance for 5 avatars,
which he never delivered. he refuses to refund my money, and he refuses to
deliver the avatars. that's more than a 'dishonest factor' -- that's a
crime -- it's called fraud.
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d19face at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Insanity is a fully trustworthy and honest person,
|
Jun 27, 2002, 6:11pm
Regardless of the existence of a contract for the avatars, you cancelled when most of the work
was complete, if he had refunded you, his business would have lost money.
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1af944$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
you can not have a 30 refund policy for hosting services (the only posted or
written refund policy heartfall has) and then use that for goods you sell.
here is heartfall's policy regarding avatars, as posted on his web site:
(DELIVERY upon Receipt of Payment)
|
check the facts before you run your mouth
Jun 27, 2002, 8:38pm
no, I mean if he refunded you after most of the work was finished, his choice was to put it up
for public sale or free, but since it was custom he may not want to do that. If he refunded you,
one could say you took his time just as easily. Nothing you can say would justify him needing to
refund you.
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1b8719$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NOW i understand. it's okay for him to defraud
me and steal my money, because if he didn't, then his business would lose
money. NOW i get it. thanks for clarifying. gosh. wow. maybe everybody
should send him money.
|
(note to self. Nominate: Write in: Most imbecilic post in an active worlds
newsgroup: Young Phalpha)
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1b7185 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Regardless of the existence of a contract for the avatars, you cancelled
when most of the work
> was complete, if he had refunded you, his business would have lost money.
>
> - YP
>
> "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d1af944$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you can not have a 30 refund policy for hosting services (the only posted
or
> written refund policy heartfall has) and then use that for goods you sell.
> here is heartfall's policy regarding avatars, as posted on his web site:
> (DELIVERY upon Receipt of Payment)
>
> check the facts before you run your mouth
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 8:40pm
Btw, how is my post imbecilic? It appears to be a perfect example of the use of human logic. If
you do wish to nominate me, be sure to use the Cy Awards nomination form, but you might want to
change imbecilic to logical. :)
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1b8719$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NOW i understand. it's okay for him to defraud
me and steal my money, because if he didn't, then his business would lose
money. NOW i get it. thanks for clarifying. gosh. wow. maybe everybody
should send him money.
|
(note to self. Nominate: Write in: Most imbecilic post in an active worlds
newsgroup: Young Phalpha)
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1b7185 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Regardless of the existence of a contract for the avatars, you cancelled
when most of the work
> was complete, if he had refunded you, his business would have lost money.
>
> - YP
>
> "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d1af944$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you can not have a 30 refund policy for hosting services (the only posted
or
> written refund policy heartfall has) and then use that for goods you sell.
> here is heartfall's policy regarding avatars, as posted on his web site:
> (DELIVERY upon Receipt of Payment)
>
> check the facts before you run your mouth
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 9:47pm
Laws vary state to state, and I doubt you'd find anything as to direct as to make Insanity
fraudulent, a judge would look at this, see that the client cancelled when work was almost
finished and expected a refund, the judge would be in favor of Insanity. There is nothing I am
missing :) If you do find laws, it might apply to stuff that is already made, not custom made.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1b9514 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP..... what you're missing here is the fact that the 30 day refund policy begins ON the date of
delivery...... period.... thats the way it WORKS.....
|
No Av's sent..... I.E. no delivery.... plain and simple, as the facts stand and the law
recognizes,
this IS fraud.....
Jun 27, 2002, 9:53pm
Actually I haven't paid him a penny. I am just looking at the facts and anyone else who would
look at the facts would realize he doesn't owe you a penny, if he owes you anything its only the
avatars, but you seem to not want them, that is not his fault. I don't buy products from him. If
a business had done fraudulent practices towards me, I would make a complaint to the BBE or
other legal possibilities, not have everyone believe my hearsay. I'm glad it's amused you :)
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1b9ae9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
thank you so much, YP for straightening me out. if you hadn't, i might have
gone the rest of my life actually thinking that when i buy and pay for
something i should get it!
|
lmao. i can see why insanity wants you for a friend. lmao. how much has
he bilked you out of? convinced you that you had to pay him, without giving
you any goods, or 'his business would lose money'? or 'take his time'?
ROFLMAO. i bet you're his favorite customer. oh my god my stomach hurts
from laughing. thanks, YP. i needed that.
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1b93f5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> no, I mean if he refunded you after most of the work was finished, his
choice was to put it up
> for public sale or free, but since it was custom he may not want to do
that. If he refunded you,
> one could say you took his time just as easily. Nothing you can say would
justify him needing to
> refund you.
>
> - YP
>
> "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d1b8719$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NOW i understand. it's okay for him to
defraud
> me and steal my money, because if he didn't, then his business would lose
> money. NOW i get it. thanks for clarifying. gosh. wow. maybe
everybody
> should send him money.
>
> (note to self. Nominate: Write in: Most imbecilic post in an active
worlds
> newsgroup: Young Phalpha)
>
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d1b7185 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> when most of the work
money.
> news:3d1af944$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
posted
> or
sell.
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 9:58pm
Your example is quite wrong buddy :) Your example compares service to custom made product. He
had the product almost finished, your service was never done, so you keeping the money is fraud.
Him keeping the money is not fraud, only thing Insanity owes ambivalent is her avatars which he
spent time on, but, she does not want it. If she requests them in a few months, but does not
deliver, he might then be guilty of fraud.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1b9a87$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP, that may seem sad, but thats the LAW my friend.... you dont deliver and keep the payment,
you
BREAK that law....
|
Think of it like this......
If I was hired to install a computer network for a customer, Took payment from them, then never
came
back on the day I promised to. They called for months, wondering when I was going to do the
installation. finally they informed me that they were cancelling the contract and wanted their
money
refunded. I call back and say NOPE.... I'm keeping your money, because it's past 30 days ( or
whatever ) And I was almost ready to come do the job, I've purchased all the materials, done all
the
necessary planning and hardware research, etc. etc. . is this NOT fraud ? They never took
possession of, or recieved said services or goods. Therefore I AM guilty of fraud... HAD I
actually
come and began the installation, and they DID recieve services or goods, then things change..
thats
where litigation or arbitration comes into play..... you can't say it's not right just because
you
think that's unfair of the customer or because my business is going to lose money.... It's very
simple... I am in business, If I DO this, my rear is going to end up in court...... the reasons
some people DON'T pursue legal recourse to being defrauded are generally due to their ignorance
of
the consumer protection laws, the small amount of money lost, or the exorbitant legal fees
amassed
during such litigation....... this is where dishonest "providers" many times, get away with such
crimes.......
just because you dont like it, or think it's not nice, really, honestly doesn't mean a
thing.....
the law is the law...... that's just the way it is
JB
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message news:3d1b7185 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Regardless of the existence of a contract for the avatars, you cancelled when most of the work
> was complete, if he had refunded you, his business would have lost money.
>
> - YP
|
Jun 27, 2002, 10:02pm
I can read quite clearly without your capitalized words, no need for them. I have realized the
contract for avatars didn't exist; however if you'd read a few posts above, you'd find out she
would still be out of her money because she cancelled when the work on the avatars was almost
done, I was wrong, but my point still stands that it was her fault she lost her money.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1ba059$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP, there IS no 30 day contract for AVATARS.... clearly stated on the site..... delivery apon
receipt of payment...... And just because YOU believe something to to be the way YOU see it,
does
not make it a fact either..... you need to realize that it's your OPINION, and nothing more
|
JB
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message news:3d1a3416 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Perhaps you've not met him in person, he does have morals and is a decent man, in what way did
> he take money? If his client asked for a refund after 30 days, yet in contract it stated no
> refund after 30 days, then well, it is simply the client's fault. I don't believe anyone has
> lost any money in him, except for one person, but it was their own fault. So therefore, he is
> not a crook.
>
> - YP
>
> "johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3d18ed85$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Funny..... I don't seem to remember spilling forth any "ill will"..... just stating my
opinion
> on
> your repeated altercations with people here...... seems to me, there've been WAY too many in
the
> past year and a half that I've been posting here..... You talk about morals, decency, blah
blah
> blah...... might be time to PRACTICE that which you preach so adamantly, my friend.....
taking
> people's money and not delivering that which was PAID for, sure doesn't qualify as ANY of
these
> attributes in MY book..... Nor many other's I'd dare say.....
>
> I also seem to remember inquiring as to your health, as I'm not a sadistic person and don't
wish
> anyone ill health..... I also asked you to back up your claims of this "serious cardiac
> surgery"
> with some manner of proof.... As, Honestly, You've quite a track record of half and untruths
> here...... Hell, I even offered to not make another post AND post an apology, had you proven
you
> were ACTUALLY ill..... I wish no ill on ANY person.... But alas, you never responded to
> THAT...... perhaps there was no way you COULD....... BTW, I dont give a hoot about the Vice
> Secretary, Dick Cheney....... HE is a man with impeccable credentials and DEMONSTRATED morals
> and
> maturity........ you on the other hand...... well, lets just count all the dollars that
> people
> have lost involving you....
>
> Also........ Hate is a pretty harsh word there Lars...... I never alluded to "hating"
> you........ I
> just think you're a crook....... ( allegedly, of course)
>
> Oh yes...... almost forgot....... I'm not a kid, genius...... in case you forgot from the
LAST
> bunch of nastiness you posted here..... (might wanna read back some and refresh your failing
> memory)
> I'm 33 years old, and an electrician / datacom systems installer..... but I suppose my MANY
> YEARS
> of schooling don't count as an education, huh ?? Maybe if I work real hard I can host worlds
> and
> make gor sequences and be an actor sometimes.....
>
> Save your presumptuous egotistical crap for someone here who MIGHT be impressed...... or just
> blinded by your smoke screens, attention shifting antics, and generally outrageous self
> aggrandizations.......
>
> And If you WERE ill....... I sincerely hope you're feeling better...... I'd assume you
were,
> since you can write posts like that.....
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 10:07pm
There is hundreds, possibly thousands of hospitals and health centers in the US, two hospitals I
know of only let you know that information over the phone if you have proof you are a relative
or friend. Also, not every hospital has a cardiac care unit, you should know that, so possibly
calling all hospitals in the area might not have had him, where I live the closest hospital with
a CC unit is Silver Spring or DC, which is about over an hour drive from Frederick.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1b9f9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Well, actually, they DO Bud..... I WORKED in a hospital for three years..... and unless the
patient
was in for psychiatric treatment, they WILL tell you if the person is there...... They'll even
tell you if that person passed away ...... I know for a fact, NOT speculating here....... they
have
NO way of knowing who calls, or why.... what if you wanted to send flowers ?
|
You may choose to disbelieve, that's your right and priviledge, but I'm saying it's true....
from
experience.......
JB
Jun 27, 2002, 10:11pm
BBE = BBB
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message news:3d1ba574 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Actually I haven't paid him a penny. I am just looking at the facts and anyone else who would
look at the facts would realize he doesn't owe you a penny, if he owes you anything its only the
avatars, but you seem to not want them, that is not his fault. I don't buy products from him. If
a business had done fraudulent practices towards me, I would make a complaint to the BBE or
other legal possibilities, not have everyone believe my hearsay. I'm glad it's amused you :)
|
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1b9ae9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
thank you so much, YP for straightening me out. if you hadn't, i might have
gone the rest of my life actually thinking that when i buy and pay for
something i should get it!
|
lmao. i can see why insanity wants you for a friend. lmao. how much has
he bilked you out of? convinced you that you had to pay him, without giving
you any goods, or 'his business would lose money'? or 'take his time'?
ROFLMAO. i bet you're his favorite customer. oh my god my stomach hurts
from laughing. thanks, YP. i needed that.
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1b93f5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> no, I mean if he refunded you after most of the work was finished, his
choice was to put it up
> for public sale or free, but since it was custom he may not want to do
that. If he refunded you,
> one could say you took his time just as easily. Nothing you can say would
justify him needing to
> refund you.
>
> - YP
>
> "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3d1b8719$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NOW i understand. it's okay for him to
defraud
> me and steal my money, because if he didn't, then his business would lose
> money. NOW i get it. thanks for clarifying. gosh. wow. maybe
everybody
> should send him money.
>
> (note to self. Nominate: Write in: Most imbecilic post in an active
worlds
> newsgroup: Young Phalpha)
>
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d1b7185 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> when most of the work
money.
> news:3d1af944$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
posted
> or
sell.
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 10:13pm
Your almost finished avatars are located on his harddrive because you had cancelled delivery,
remember? :)
- YP
[View Quote]"ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message news:3d1ba705$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
"filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3D1B9646.423163E3 at privacy.com...
> 1. Never refused a refund.
yes you did. should i post your emails where you refuse my refund? or do
you want to post them?
|
> 2. Never refused delivery of avatars.
yup you did. if you didn't, where are my avatars?
> libelous comments
libel involves lying. i haven't lied.
the person has seen
> the avatars she had ordered and approved of their texturing and added
features
now that is an outrageous lie. i never saw any added features. you told me
you were trying to tack curls on their heads, and couldn't get it right.
you made references to 'improvements' of the fairies, but other than the
curls, never even told me what those other features were. then you told me
you had 'lost' the fairy files, and would have to start over again. you
never again told me you were doing any work on the fairies of any kind.
> with exception of one avatar . She claims nothing was ever done.
uh yeah. i claim nothing was ever done on it cause you those were the words
out of your very mouth -- that you had not done any work on the scorpion
king avatar, but you 'thought you were getting your thoughts together'.
> is that the person sends such vulgar e-mails, no one would care to read
the> trash.
oh yeah. gosh. what was it again? let me look it up. ah. here. you
must mean when i said you could take all the newsgroup posts you told me you
have been collecting and shove them up your... oh. that's it. i used the
heinie word. gosh. i'm sowwy.
if I > recall, stated she would never even accept them if sent to her.
yeah i'll accept them. so long as they are completed as ordered, discussed,
and agreed to. here -- i'll even go you one better -- i'll even take $160
worth of non-custom avatars of my choice. just say the word. i'll pick em.
you send em. i'll send you a statement that i am satisfied.
allow us a counter> suit for all the slander and libel as well as the
intentional interference with> business relations of our customers among
other things.
oh dear god. slander and libel are based on LIES that cause damage. TRUTH
that causes damage is not prosecutable in any way shape or form. so because
it is the truth, and i can prove it, i can freely say, verbally or in
writing, that you defrauded me out of $160. doesn't matter if it gets your
panties in a wad. doesn't matter if you lose every customer you have.
because it is the truth, and i can prove it,
> the person has violated licensing rights by sharing the avatars with
other> worlds. Therefore we are owed licensing fees for those avatars she
distributed> unlawfully.
blatant lie. i sent one avatar to one person for 10 minutes to test it.
that is not 'sharing with other worlds'. that's a 10 minute test. you said
it was fine. i have the chat log. he deleted the avatar after the test. i
sent you confirmation. i have that recorded too.
the other avatar i sent to someone is the one i bought from you specifically
for the purpose of giving it for a gift. you said that was fine. in fact,
you said that was kind. i have that recorded too.
now an example of a license violation is that you sent one of my custom avs
to someone as a gift to use in their world. not to test. not with my
permission. THAT's a license violation. now you understand the difference?
luckily, the person recognized what was happening, and deleted the av from
her world.
Jun 27, 2002, 10:54pm
Whoa, really? my god, I never knew that, my context of that word was "Evidence based on the
reports of others", stop insulting my intelligence, you will get nowhere, and get nothing, and
like it
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1bacb1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP....... defination of "hearsay" as follows...
|
hear·say Pronunciation Key (hîrs)
n.
Unverified information heard or received from another; rumor.
Law. Evidence based on the reports of others rather than the personal knowledge of a witness and
therefore generally not admissible as testimony.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
hearsay
adj : heard through another rather than directly; "hearsay information" n : gossip (usually a
mixture of truth and untruth) passed around by word of mouth [syn: rumor, rumour]
Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University
Therefore what ambivalent says is NOT "hearsay" plain and simple...... as you're hearing this
FROM
"the personal knowledge of a witness" and directly from the party involved...... i.e.
ambivalent
( THE person who was involved in the situation ) She is making a statement of facts, from her
point
of view..... or you may call it an accusation...... but it just is not hearsay.....
JB
Jun 27, 2002, 10:58pm
Well, mine didn't. I think your wrong on that, a hospital telling whether you are there or not
to a stranger would seem very unlikely.
- YP
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3d1bae6b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Most major hospitals will have a coronary unit. If you call to see if the
person is present, they will tell you. It's public information.
|
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1ba8dd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There is hundreds, possibly thousands of hospitals and health centers in
the US, two hospitals I
> know of only let you know that information over the phone if you have
proof you are a relative
> or friend. Also, not every hospital has a cardiac care unit, you should
know that, so possibly
> calling all hospitals in the area might not have had him, where I live the
closest hospital with
> a CC unit is Silver Spring or DC, which is about over an hour drive from
Frederick.
>
> - YP
>
> "johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3d1b9f9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, actually, they DO Bud..... I WORKED in a hospital for three
years..... and unless the
> patient
> was in for psychiatric treatment, they WILL tell you if the person is
there...... They'll even
> tell you if that person passed away ...... I know for a fact, NOT
speculating here....... they
> have
> NO way of knowing who calls, or why.... what if you wanted to send
flowers ?
>
> You may choose to disbelieve, that's your right and priviledge, but I'm
saying it's true....
> from
> experience.......
>
> JB
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 11:14pm
Where in your example did you say that? There's a big difference of consultant/engineer to a 3d
modeler. Knowledge and experience are rather equivalent, knowledge is gained by research,
experience is gained by action. Experience of course I can't get on my own yet, but knowledge I
can. Don't give me that age shit, you have no more of a degree in business law than I do.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1bb488$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
YP.... in my example, the part you so clearly missed, is the fact that I had claimed to have "
purchased equipment, done the necessary planning and hardware research " If you owned a
business,
you'd realize that these are VERY billable services on their own..... ask any consultant or
engineer...
|
Anyway, You have to realize that there are people here with REAL business experience... we're
not
all teenagers....... maybe once, but that was a long time ago ;O)
Jun 27, 2002, 11:16pm
They also look at your drivers license and ask your relation, if you say your some person
wanting to see if he's really there to see if he's faking being in the hospital, you know as
well as I do they would raise some eyebrows.
- YP
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3d1bb54c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Unless you're under 18, there's no reason not to tell. You can go to the
desk and get the very same information.
|
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3d1bb4cb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, mine didn't. I think your wrong on that, a hospital telling whether
you are there or not
> to a stranger would seem very unlikely.
>
> - YP
>
> "bowen" <thisguyisashimmyritzer at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3d1bae6b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Most major hospitals will have a coronary unit. If you call to see if the
> person is present, they will tell you. It's public information.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "young phalpha" <RhaneC at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3d1ba8dd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the US, two hospitals I
> proof you are a relative
> know that, so possibly
the
> closest hospital with
> Frederick.
> news:3d1b9f9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> years..... and unless the
> there...... They'll even
> speculating here....... they
> flowers ?
> saying it's true....
>
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2002, 11:22pm
When all you have is first person account and a chatlog, "hearsay" would seem a right word
regardless of it meant to not be first person usage.
- YP
[View Quote]"johnny b" <uniquect at optonline.net> wrote in message news:3d1bb70c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
No attempt to insult....... just pointing out that your use of the word was incorrect..... you
stated that ambivalent was posting "hearsay" which IS incorrect, as it was not "the reports of
others" it was the report of HER..... a first person account........
|
My replies aren't meant to be insulting, just statements....... I'm sorry if you felt insulted,
it
wasn't intended........ and my use of capital letters is targeted to put emphasis on a
particular
word...... much as you'd emphasize certain words when you speak....... in real life.......
JB
|