1  |   Order by index

Apr 16, 2001, 2:10am

The newest 3.1 beta (not available to public yet) allows more than 750
worlds, by using a more than one packet. Well, shouldn't the same happen to
contacts lists in 3.2? Just a thought..

- YP


begin 666 Young Phalpha.vcf
M0D5'24XZ5D-!4D0-"E9%4E-)3TXZ,BXQ#0I..E!H86QP:&$[66]U;F<[.TUR
M+ at T*1DXZ66]U;F< at 4&AA;'!H80T*3DE#2TY!344Z65 -"D%$4CM(3TU%.CL[
M.TUI9&1L971O=VX[36%R>6QA;F0[,C$W-CD[56YI=&5D(%-T871E<PT*3$%"
M14P[2$]-13M%3D-/1$E.1SU154]4140M4%))3E1!0DQ%.DUI9&1L971O=VXL
M($UA<GEL86YD(#(Q-S8Y/3!$/3!!56YI=&5D(%-T871E<PT*6"U704(M1T5.
M1$52.C(-"D5-04E,.U!2148[24Y415).150Z>7! ;7ER=&AC;RYC;VT-"E)%
?5CHR,# Q,#0Q-E0P-#(W-#9:#0I%3D0Z5D-!4D0-" at ``
`
end

Apr 16, 2001, 3:14am

hey thats not a bad idea
it would probably also enable bot contact lists.. !!

you are a genius :)

[View Quote] > The newest 3.1 beta (not available to public yet) allows more than 750
> worlds, by using a more than one packet. Well, shouldn't the same happen to
> contacts lists in 3.2? Just a thought..
>
> - YP


--
- Tony M (a.k.a Tony56) [tony at vrunited.itgo.com]
"Through Cyberspace, we are Virtually United"
"Points to Ponder: If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress
the opposite of Progress?"
____________________________________________________________

Apr 16, 2001, 8:23am

Hrmm, maybe just expand it by fifty more, we dont want the server getting nuked by dozens of contact lists querying for citizens 1
through 100000000000000000000
[View Quote]

Apr 16, 2001, 2:05pm

or just double it and wait till we have compliants for even more which would
be a while :)

- YP

[View Quote]

Apr 18, 2001, 4:17am

i suppose that could work.. but i don't see a reason why a person would need more then 100.. i have can't keep track of five people
at one time let alone 500..

--
- JBell
[View Quote]

Apr 18, 2001, 7:46am

Its the social butterflies that think they have 100 friends but in reality 97 refuse to respond to them and 98 honestly hate them :)
[View Quote]

Apr 19, 2001, 1:52am

Those 2 limitations are (probably) totally unrelated...
the worlds list size was limited because of a limit on the total size of the message to send, while the contact list was limited
because somewhere in his code Roland just put a line saying "if there are more than 100 contacts, just ignore the rest"... So the
2nd one was done on purpose, while the 1st one was a limitation of the method used to transmit the worlds list...

Fox Mc Cloud

"young phalpha" <yp at myrthco.com> a écrit dans le message news: 3ada70d0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The newest 3.1 beta (not available to public yet) allows more than 750
> worlds, by using a more than one packet. Well, shouldn't the same happen to
> contacts lists in 3.2? Just a thought..
>
> - YP

1  |   Order by index