|
zeo toxion // User Search
zeo toxion // User Search
Nov 27, 2002, 3:11pm
AIM doesn't have any ads accept a little button in the buddy list that goes to aol.com
and plus if i wanted video i can download the video software that you can use with it. Theres a lot more people
on aim then yahoo, at least people i know.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"johnny b" <jbitt2ATjuno.com> wrote in message news:3de4b606$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hardly just as bad........I've been using it for the last 2 years now....... one popup screen when it starts
and that's it......
> plus you can voice and webcam now too..... works fine for me........
>
>
> "brock" <Brock at iceflare.net> wrote in message news:3de41ea6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 30, 2002, 2:53am
Huh? AIM doesn't have the option in it only OE does (the option of whether or not I want AIM to start
automatically when I run OE). The reason I usually have AIM check my e-mail is because that's usually open
whenever I'm on the internet and OE isn't running unless I'm actually reading it.
I'm getting the error messages because both OE and AIM (because OE starts AIM when it starts) check my e-mail
at the same time. Get it? heh
I do have broadband but that doesn't have anything to do with this. I turned off AIM mail checking until I
figure out how to actually stop AIM starting automatically with OE even when I turned off the option in OE.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3de83d56$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> "zeo toxion" <brandon at metrocast.net> wrote in message
> news:3de4fbd6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And since i have my AIM check my
> at the same time which results in OE
> messages...ugh...ill just have to turn off mail
>
> WHY have it enabled in AIM if you (apparently!) don't even have it enabled
> within OE itself??? That's most likely why you're getting error messages.
>
> Plus, if you've got a broadband pipe like I do, you only need to enable it
> within OE anyways.
>
> Such REDUNDANCY....
>
> PC Hamster
>
>
|
Nov 30, 2002, 7:35pm
I'm hardly a noob :) Unfortunately there was no value that was related to AOL or AIM so I didn't have to worry
about this. And yes I know all about the registry, I'm not going to go in and screw with it without care.
Though I don't think changing a value from 0 to 1 will destroy my registry unless the value is supposed to be
something other then 0 or 1 but it's pretty easy to tell.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"anarkissed" <anarkissed at nospam.alt.2600.com> wrote in message news:3de92720 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hey, fun, sending newbies in to edit the registry, what a cute idea! (NOT)
> when desperately trying to reboot a system with a fuxored registry one can
> hold the f8 key during boot to bring up the boot menu and select "boot to
> msdos" then type the command scanreg /restore to bring up the backup
> registry to restore your system and correct things if you actually try the
> advice below and screw it up. Write that down, scanreg /restore
>
>
> "johnny b" <jbitt2ATjuno.com> wrote in message
> news:3de8ac50$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> option turned off in OE to start AIM, yet it still turns on,
> been written to the registry correctly...... god bless
> go in and nose around in
> #-xxx}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0 (or 4.0, whatever)\ ass't
> things.. I'm sure there's one in there that says something about
> PlaySoundOnNewMail 0x00000001 (1) " obviously we can see what
> play the sound as 1=on and 0=off when you get new mail. You
> 1 or a 0 respectively...... I'd bet that if you can find
> (on) instead of 0 (off)
> not at all.... one little screw up and you're toast......
> you do anything ! I can't stress this enough...... and If
> to give you a hand, as the results can pretty much suck, if
> news:3de8445f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> whether or not I want AIM to start
> e-mail is because that's usually open
> reading it.
>
>
|
Nov 30, 2002, 7:42pm
No wait I think I found it.
"Messenger Auto logon" which is set to 0.
See, it's uncheck in the options yet it still does it. Oh well I guess I can live with it. It's just strange
why it still starts by itself.
Another thing that seemed off place was under Outlook Express there is only 5.0 but my IE and OE are 6.x.
That's the only one so it must still be using 5.0 in the registry for some reason.
--
Zeo
Dec 4, 2002, 12:12am
But still like they said your setting them up to be let down.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <CarLBanks at insight.rr.com> wrote in message news:3ded595b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Also you may not get what you asked for. Sometimes the stuff gets lost on
> the way to your house so you may not get what you asked for.
>
> "sk8man1" <greg at greggage.com> wrote in message
> news:3ded4ca0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> how
> a
> lol,
> gifts
>
>
|
Dec 4, 2002, 6:41pm
The difference is the parents hear what the kids say they want and they dont when they chat it.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"sk8man1" <greg at greggage.com> wrote in message news:3dede6ee$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The mall santas aren't promising you'll get what you want.
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
> news:3ded89a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> for
> have
> gift
> "to
> have
> and
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2002, 7:45pm
Boo hoo...
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <CarLBanks at insight.rr.com> wrote in message news:3df10fe5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> A stupid prank that's been done before.
>
> "john" <johnfricker at lineone.net> wrote in message
> news:3df1065b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Dec 21, 2002, 2:24am
I've used it once a while ago. Who really NEEDS little pictures and graphics and sounds and what not in their
e-mails. I don't mind HTML for fonts, backgrounds, and whatnot but Incredamail is a bit overdoing it.
Fortunately no one I know that sends me e-mail uses it.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3e03e6df at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Every god forsaken, idiotic, intellectually challanged moron who uses
> Incredimail should be put up against a wall and shot until theyre nothing
> more than quarks (fundamental particaly) because theyre bandwidth wasting,
> memory hogging, network grinding, packet sizing sods!
>
> Anyone else feel that Incredimail is 1 of the worlds worst invensions, its
> an IE clone,
>
>
|
Dec 21, 2002, 3:46pm
Bang
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"chazrad" <petrossadeletethis at msn.com> wrote in message news:Xns92EB7075AC00Fpetrossa at 64.94.241.201...
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
> news:3e03e6df at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
> Shoot me :)
|
Jan 20, 2003, 3:47pm
theres an html version
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message news:3e2b028d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
> its a satelite map viewing thingy majiga. but u can only use it on nvidia
Jan 20, 2003, 12:14am
So first you enCROUched then you enCOUChed?....its encroach ;) Sorry just felt like pointing that out.
--
Zeo
[View Quote]"agent fox mulder" <agentfoxmulder at shaw.ca> wrote in message news:3e2b24b2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
> floor00.rwx was encouching over one of his objects
Feb 18, 2002, 5:17pm
im guessing he puts passwords on them (like everyone else)
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c714c9e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "alterlinks" <pasdespamwebmaster at alterlinks.fr> wrote in message
> news:Xns91B9C324AFBA5Alterlinks at 166.90.181.12...
>
> Could you give a general description of how you "protect" artwork, please?
>
>
> -Agent1
>
>
|
Feb 18, 2002, 5:58pm
actually he said directories which means people cant view the list from the
web...although thats pretty easy just by putting an index.html in there
[View Quote]"moff piett" <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3c715701 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Can't password textures though, I don't think.
>
>
|
Feb 19, 2002, 4:53pm
I do agree that the world is far outdated but i do not think it should be
deleted. Yes it could use more avs and the gz could use soem work but i dont
want it to look like awgate becuase AW was the first and only world there
was back in 1997 (i think thats when it started) and its so much a part of
activeworlds history it cannot totally be deleted or replaced.
I do think that a new building world might do better but it would have to
have a lot of the newer avs they have been working on (i think they look
better) and definitly new objects (maybe actually puting those 3d homepage
objects in like they were supposed to do).
The builds need to stay but the gz could be made to look better which
wouldnt maek it look so old and the avs, like i said, all that would make it
look a littl ebetter but a new buildign world is a better choice then to
completley replace it.
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c728164 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Has any one noticed how obsolete Alpha World is? It's avatars are tinny,
the
> objects are a hodge podge of left-overs and the vast majority of the older
> builds are as good as destroyed by revisions to the browser.
>
> Has any one stopped to wonder, what sort of a drain on AWcorps resources
> this out of date world is? As you already know, further upgrades to the
> browser are made difficult as the developers attempt ( and don't always
> succeed) to make new compatible with the old. Lets face it, after 7 years
> Alpha is sad and tired and pulls down the general standard of the
> ActiveWorlds experience for newbies. And the life blood of any community
AND
> company is newbies.
>
> As much as I love Alpha World and her many beautiful builds I firmly
believe
> that it should pass on. With enough warning that citizens can transfer
their
> builds and any others that are worth saving to a new world and make the
> necessary changes that it would take, only the unwanted rubbish would be
> left behind. It is important that any product keep up with the times in
> order to be a viable option as a marketable asset and our sentiment for
old
> Alpha is going to destroy that and our community.
>
> I know ppl are going to be upset by this view but stop and think before
you
> post a negative response. How many ppl see AW GZ as sadly in need of a
> refit? Compare Alpha World to many other worlds. The answer is obvious,
the
> old girl has seen better days.
>
> We want this software to continue and grow , both for AW's good and our
own.
> The more newbies that we can impress with the technology and with our
> community , the more chance we ALL have of staying in our virtual home
away
> from home.
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 4:46pm
in one second in each world a bot with privs of citezin number one could
change everyones.....welcome message...? you never know bots work very fast.
It could also collect data about your world such as any sor of settings
althoguh i dont think it can qeury that fast. It could wipe out a world that
fastim pretty sure (though i dont think they are stupid enough to do that im
just saying its a possibility).
I'm not THAT worried about this although whoever owns it *coughcough* had
better tell us what they are up to before a riot starts.
-Zeo
(formerly Cozmo)
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C74974A.DF5201FC at oct31.de...
> Someone without world bot rights is using a bot in several
> worlds. I checked the logs of several unrelated worlds that
> have no bot rights entry in common, and all showed
>
> Wed 02/20/02 18:21:44 68.15.23.167:1725 -1 CONNECTED
> Wed 02/20/02 18:21:44 worldname 68.15.23.167:1725 -1 ENTER 30929
50
> Wed 02/20/02 18:21:44 worldname 68.15.23.167:1725 -1 IDENTIFIED
'[Search Spider]' 0 1
> Wed 02/20/02 18:21:44 worldname 68.15.23.167:1725 1 EVENT MASK
0x0
> Wed 02/20/02 18:21:44 worldname 68.15.23.167:1725 1 DISCONNECTED
>
> It seems to have gone through the world list in alphabetical
> order and stayed in each world only for seconds.
>
> No "Not welcome" message, traceroute reveals nothing.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 4:47pm
oh something else....if the name is [Search Spider] maybe it was looking for
something? Perhaps a person or something? But using cit number 1 just to get
into privite worlds isnt such a good thign to do to the worldowners.
Feb 21, 2002, 9:34pm
unless they hack your world server?
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c7573d4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why would they bother doing that when they could just flip a bit and turn
> your world off?
>
> -Agent1
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3C754E81.729A9CDF at oct31.de...
>
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 4:52pm
since when is the welcoem message and title (or whatever was collected)
personal information about the user? never. The way i see it was there was
no harm done and im glad people can find my world now although i dont see
what the title OR welcome message has anything to do with whats in your
world. I admit they should of at least mentioned it on the uni welcome
message or the ngs but its over with boo hoo.
And all you people who are claiming its illegal, its perfectly legal for
them. CIt number 1 was MADE to have caretaker in all worlds for a reason,
who says they cant use itm it IS their software and you are paying to USE
it. You do not own your world server becuase you cannot sell it to other
people or modify it. Try reading some of the user agreements or whatever
they are called im pretty sure it will be explained in there.
-Zeo Toxion
[View Quote]"count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
news:3c7621a5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not a direct reply to this specific post but to the the tread in general.
> I could bet my last cents on that this information collecting is done by
the
> universe software in the future and not by a bot.It would aslo make sense
> ,because that way the data in the search option would be easier to keep
> updated (I belive).I also think that the world option could have one
"page"
> beside features and rights.It could be a page with a few simple questions
> for the search data base like"public building "yes" or "no",tourists
allowed
> "yes" or "no" and a area where one could write in keywords for the search
> index.That is the only way I think the search will be of any use
,otherwise
> it will be a new feature that nobody has no use of (compare show
> cellgrid).This all could result that you could have worlds listed depart
> from users and alphabetical order ,as it is now, also according to
> rating,building ,theme ,keyword or whatever u can come up with.Maybe
> something that rightclicking a world in the tab should bring up a
> discreption of the world if the owner has choosen to enter any info
> there.This way people with a slowish connection would not need to download
> worlds they just to find out that this is particulary a world they did not
> want to see.
>
> Secondly,I guess we can agree all that this particular bot did not harm
our
> worlds in any way.I just think people should be informed if the are forced
> to take part in beta testing tho.I guess a rule is that the owner of the
> world is the one deciding who has botrights in his/her/its world.Cit #1
> automatically has caretaker rights in each world,so does this mean that if
> someone that is allowed to use the privs of cit #1,decide to do something
in
> our world,we should just except it since by buying a worldlicense we agree
> (not that they say it anywhere) to "give" caretaker rights to cit #1.Since
> AW.inc owns the software I guess they teoretically has the legal right to
do
> whatever they want with it.I am not sure what the laws in USA are about
> collecting information and keeping databases of personal information.I
know
> atleast in Finland it is illegal to sell information to a third part that
> you have collected from your customer.I am not a lawyer so I do not know
the
> legal aspects on this,but I think it has a moral point.
> Personally I think AW.inc should have some kind of guidelines about the
> useage about cit #1.AW.inc own the software yes,but we buy our license to
> our world and pay a yearly rent,should we then have full control over our
> worlds or shall we accept the fact that cit #1 can do whatever it likes in
> our world.
> All in all, I think it would have been polite to inform the customers
about
> this beta testing.I am sure AW.inc has not broken the law by not doing
> it,but if you start to use your customers as guinneapigs it might not be
> moraly very right tho.
> This was just a start,what if next time AW.inc decide to place a bot in
each
> world just to hang out there,shall we aprove that also,since cit #1 can do
> that."If you give your little finger to the devil it will take your entire
> hand"
>
> Drac
>
> ananas <vha at oct31.de> kirjoitti viestissä:3C74974A.DF5201FC at oct31.de...
30929
> 50
> '[Search Spider]' 0 1
> 0x0
DISCONNECTED
>
>
|
Feb 23, 2002, 3:01pm
he DOES work for AW and hes the one who did it so i think he would know what
he was doing
[View Quote]"aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
news:3c77c7a4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Pardon me, I meant to say MrGrimm, not GrimReaper.
|
Aine
[View Quote]"aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
news:3c77c58c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c766b76 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL, the principle is a pretty stupid thing to debate about.
> *roll eyes* Now AWCom has to ask permission to update their own program?
LOL
> :)
|
Principles are VERY worthwhile things to debate about. The fact that AWC
management apparently doesn't understand the importance of principles, such
as integrity and honesty, and continues to do one thing after another which
blatantly points out their lack of principles, SHOULD be disturbing to
anyone here who has money invested in worlds and/or citizenships.
Whether the bot was indexing or not isn't even a salient point in this
debate, although I would like to point out that no one has actually PROVEN
what the bot was actually doing or is capable of doing... we only have the
word of one unidentified GrimReaper who supposedly works for AWC.
Aine
Feb 23, 2002, 3:04pm
AW doesnt own there own software? Umm....im pretty sure we are all paying to
USE it. Im going to go read the agreement thingy right now anyways.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c77b96c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> uhm... MrGrimm said he copyed the title, greeting and keywords... that's
the
> property of the owner of the world. Ok, so it isn't as bad as querying the
> world and copying it, but it's a matter of principle, because they could
do
> just that later on.
> Entering a world to build a search index is "something", so they shouldn't
> have done it without permission. If they had *asked* I'm pretty sure about
> everyone would've let them, but when they don't it's a breach of privacy
and
> copyright. You wouldn't like it if your landlord came into your house
> without asking first, even if it was his house, would you? (in this case,
it
> isn't even the AWC's own property, so you could look at them as burglars
> entering the house). No, I'm not petty, your comments about my bot don't
> change my feelings about what you're saying on *this* subject. Maybe you
are
> petty because you automatically assume I was being petty? Heard about
> integrity?
>
> KAH
>
> <snip>
>
>
|
Feb 23, 2002, 3:04pm
attacking? oh please....
[View Quote]"bobhetherington" <nobby at nobcol.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3c773daa$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> An apology would have been nice for such a beach of netiquette
> and an assurance that world owners will be informed of any future
intrusions
> by this or similar bots. Attacking respected citizens like Ananas &
CarolAnn
> only increases the suspicion that the bot might not be as innocent as it
is
> claimed to be.
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c76e529 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
knows
twist
> it
> the
anything.
happened
any
just
seriously
ENTER
EVENT
>
>
|
Feb 24, 2002, 9:38pm
Its not a backdoor unless it wasn't made to do that and it is neccesary to
build the database. The bot will be used in the future for updates and we
can't have an eruption of threads every time it happens. Its not coping our
builds or anything its just collecting a few things which will benefit the
cmmunity but the community has to jump on every little thign AW does and
make them look like malicous hackers. Why can't you just accept that they
know what thay're doing (and they do) and leave it alone.
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C796CAA.DB5AA7EC at oct31.de...
> Any CT can, yes. And any citizen can extract the
> informatios from his cache, and I have no problem
> with that. The information isn't secret.
>
> But still the technical user ID of a universe owner
> (cit. #1) is a backdoor. Not an illegal one, but it
> should only be used when it is necessary.
>
> dion wrote:
news:3C795D18.F71C1647 at oct31.de...
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 25, 2002, 1:14am
actually it is documented in many places that says citezin number one has
rights in all worlds, etc etc... its pretty common knowledge if you've been
here a while. they arent trying to hide this fact and really can't with
other uni owners knowing about it. It could be a security risk becuase any
user can use cit#1 privs if they know the ppw which is highly unlikely. but
the post is saying that the bot would do harm to the worlds, steal, etc when
the programmer works for AW i think he knows what hes doing unless he wants
to get fired and banned, i think if every world got wiped out or something
they could figure it out pretty easily.
[View Quote]"macb" <Z at X.Y> wrote in message news:3C795789.70102 at X.Y...
> zeo toxion wrote:
>
to
we
our
the
they
>
>
> What definition of BACKDOOR are you using? Something that does
> something that it was not intended to do is usually referred to as a
> "Side Effect".
>
>
> Check this:
>
> --------------------------------
> http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/B/backdoor.html
>
> BACKDOOR: Also called a trapdoor. An undocumented way of gaining access
> to a program, online service or an entire computer system. The backdoor
> is written by the programmer who creates the code for the program. It is
> often only known by the programmer. A backdoor is a potential security
risk.
> --------------------------------
>
> I and a couple of others are using the term properly. An INTENTIONAL
> bit of code put in by the programmers (for whatever reason).
>
> You and other keep getting this confused with "What the bot did." and I
> think most of us agree that the bot did not do any harm in this
> particular case. So there is no need to keep explaining that to us.
>
> Now read the last sentence of that definition: "A backdoor is a
> potential security risk."
>
> That has nothing to do with the competence of the programmer. It has
> to do with the ability of a dishonest insider, or a hacker on the
> outside becoming aware of the backdoor and how to access it. And I know
> with a fair degree of certainty that this has been done on occasion.
>
> How do we know the backdoor exists in the first place? Because people
> (AWLD people) have used it in the past and slipped up and left tracks.
> Just like they did this time, except in the past the tracks have been
> things like screwed up builders lists etc. We KNOW, we have EXPERIENCED
> this, we are not just hypothesizing here.
>
> It was NOT necessary to build the database (whatever the database
> actually is), since the information could have been solicited from
> interested world owners.
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 5:53pm
i doubt it. there would be a huge argument saying its their worlds etc
etc....either way peopel are goign to complain and this way they arent
waisting their time
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c7a7c55 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I bet that if they had asked nobody would've made a fuss and would've let
> them...
>
> KAH
>
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c7a73d1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
> indexing info...and all hell breaks loose in the
> world.....got the idea? you people are a waste of their
> the ride......:) your starting to ruin the fun for the
> their SOFTWARE not your social future..... don't be so
> news:3c77b96c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that's
> the
> the
could
> do
> shouldn't
> about
privacy
> and
> case, it
burglars
don't
you
> are
>
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 5:54pm
its not like their gettign you adress and phone number my god.....
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c7a9328$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Uh, I'm not crying about it. It's very illegal to use a backdoor to get
> information on something. I would just liked to have known if they were
> going to do this.. maybe a universe message would've been nice. Why do
> people complain about other people complaining? If you don't like it,
don't
> read it, simple as that. Much less respond to it.
>
> -Silenced
>
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c7a9213$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sheeesh like you have something you want private so
LOL
> you guys are a hoot fer sure. hehehe
> news:3c7a9131$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> practice
> allowed)
> about
> choice
> post
to
like
> it
> owning
> the
> matter
> permission to
> index
> the
the
> as
> because
so
> they
> pretty
> breach of
> your
> (in
them
> as
about
> my
> subject.
> Heard
>
>
|
Feb 26, 2002, 7:25pm
let's see...Any bot can record the welcome messages if it wants to in any
public world. And the only reason "it gets the heck out of there as quick as
it can not to get busted" is becuase it's not goign to sit there and have a
coversation in every 1000+ worlds it stops at. They made it log-in invisible
(which any bot can do) so that it wouldnt bother anyone or see the chat.
They aren't sneaking around that's just the way bots work.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c7bc720 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what is wrong with you people? lol why can't you get this into your heads:
> they DO own the SOFTWARE, but they have NO ownership over what the users
> have CREATED with it (ie, world content, and I mean all content, including
> the greeting). Then one day they decided that it would be a good idea
making
> a search engine for worlds, I think so too. But then they made the fatal
> error of building an index with a bot that without prior permissions comes
> in and grabs content before it gets the heck out of there as quick as it
can
> not to get busted. That's breaking the law, they stole the property of
their
> users. The license doesn't say no nothing about them owning what it's
users
> created! I think YOU are the one that needs to be enlightened and not
> certainly not the other way round!
>
> KAH
>
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c7a8b58$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
and
> publish an INDEX to ALL of it...:)
> "bucking the system" and quit doing it with the claim of
> play elswhere :)
> news:3c7a830c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> world
world
> to
> much at
get
> the
> each
> off
> of
> that's
> querying
> could
sure
> privacy
> house
this
> burglars
> don't
Maybe
> you
> about
>
>
|
Feb 26, 2002, 8:00pm
if i was the one doing it i wouldnt think poeple would overreact to it so
much and i probably wouldnt have bothered saying anything becuase it usually
wouldnt matter but people in the ngs complain about everything so whatever
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c7bff36$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It can if it has bot rights to enter, but that's the point, this bot
didn't
> have the right to enter given to it by the >>>owner<<<. Like I said, it
> probably wouldn't have mattered if they said they were going to do it, but
> they did it in secret.
>
> -Silenced
>
> "zeo toxion" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3c7bfd65 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
any
quick
> as
have
> a
> invisible
> heads:
users
> including
fatal
> comes
it
post
> quit
owning
> a
matter
to
index
> hell
> future
> keywords...
> they
they
pretty
of
your
as
> bot
Heard
>
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 4:56pm
Great if its being sold in the stores thats great more publicity. AS LONG AS
WE CAN STILL PAY THE WAY WE ARE. And if what dion said is true then that
would be the worst decision they could ever make. Almost everyone will stay
in 3.2 and continue to use out-dated software that hampers AWs ability to
grow until they eventually make a forced upgrade and then lose their entire
customer base except for the few people that actually want to waist their
money buying upgrades do. If they do that then thats it, im gone. I wouldn't
be able to take anymore of their crap.
Let this be a lessson to you AWCorp!
-Zeo Toxion
[View Quote]"wizard myrddin" <wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message
news:3c764420$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Anybody in the community hear anything about the elleged new client (3.3)
> been offered as bought software package (including a cit)
>
> (The hills are alight with the sounds of rumours)
>
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 9:15pm
Im not trying to say that you shouldn't help people but business dicisions
are for a good reason. AWCorp isn't trying to hurt little children ok.
Either they raise prices and stay in business and maybe some of the customer
base can't use their product anymore or they go out of business and EVERYONE
can't use their product anymore, what can they do? Either way someone going
to be restricted. Businesses don't just make their product free becuase some
people can't afford it. I'm not trying to be mean but that's how a business
works.
Some of us complain about your links becuase of the number of times you do
it. A simple link at the bottom of your post would be fine but you repeat it
a few times people see it as spam. Please don't reply with "i help people so
that means i can do anything i want (no offense)" Also not intending to be
an insult, by looking at your posts people wouldn't think of you as a person
that helps people, alls you really are doing is complaining and attacking
people. Your reply to agent says that he is "looking for a fight" when hes
trying to defend himself from your posts and then you reply again and give
him another reason to leave, why can't you just leave it alone or tone down
your replies a bit?
AW will adertise if they want, again thats a business decision and i don't
really go out of my way to question the way businesses run. Ok so maybe at
first i blow up but then i realize theres nothing i can really do about it.
And another thing, just becuase you help people (obviusly not on the boards)
does not mean your world hosting services is any better. Im not trying to
say its bad but come on, if i ended world hunger would that make my hosting
services any better? Not really. It doesn't have anything to do with the
services at all. I know a marketing plow when i see one. And again imnot
trying to bash your services as they are porbably as good as any others but
the way you act on the NGs does reflect on how others see your services and
right now you are not representing your services very well. In fact you say
you help people while at the same time attacking another persons posts.
Think about it.
I know you'll reply and confirm what i've just said but its not my problem
ok, acting immaturely like that doesn't help anyone even if you help other
people sometimes as most of us do anyways (and yet we don't boast about it
and mention of our businesses at the same time). I hope you really realize
what your doing and act like an adult about it.
-Zeo Toxion
[View Quote]"filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3C76ADD3.59DC2D91 at privacy.com...
> You are just looking for a fight, simple as that. Again... Filmkr is my
veteran
> Cit account which I have had for years. InSaNiTy is one that represents my
> Avatar designs. I often sign my posts as Filmkr aka InSaNiTy
> http://worldhosting.heartfall.com but then people like you whine that I
place a
> link there.
>
> As for my care of users... I spend many hours per day helping new world
owners.
> I listen to the harm that has been done them. It is not pleasant to hear
the
> tears of a user who is bed ridden and crying because they bought a world
but now
> with AW's hikes they can no longer afford to enjoy it. I hear a great
deal of
> the sorrow of the many user hurt by this. It makes me sick as it does not
follow
> any normal business school teaching at all and is 100% uncalled for.
Perhaps you
> can simply ignore that sort of pain that users have gone through. I have a
> heart... I have public records showing my care for people on this planet.
I
> can't sleep while AW bullies up on crippled bed ridden users and allow
punks to
> spout out and flame them. I stood up for the hurt ones who were double
billed as
> well. Everyone laughed and called those users stupid... Perhaps if I
looked
> into it I might find the majority of flamers come from people who have
ties to
> working with AW?
>
> If AW wants $$$, why don't they advertise for users like normal companies
do??
> Is AW Bundled with video cards?? Why Not? Are they on TV? Why not?? If
they
> did a bit of work in management and marketing rather than beat up the few
> current users there are maybe they would see some growth. There actions of
this
> year have lead to a sharp and drastic decline not to mention a great deal
of Bad
> Blood I doubt they will ever recover from.
>
> Filmkr aka InSaNiTy
> http://worldhosting.heartfall.com < A place to go when you want helpful,
> experienced, reliable and friendly hosting by a host who does not sit by
and
> watch other's get hurt... one who steps out and helps defend their needs!
> Observe http://www.heartfall.com/eqrelief/ to see the lengths of his
charity.
>
>
>
>
> agent1 wrote:
>
reading
these
know
him.
doesn't
less
answered
Basic
to
message...
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 5:56pm
if you pay attention he said hed stick around to read the replies.....
[View Quote]"chickengurl" <ilove at chickensex.com> wrote in message
news:3c7a8558$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Weren't you going to stop reading the newsgroups?
>
> If you want to go, then go...and have fun doing what ever else it is you
> have planned.
>
> buh bye
>
>
> "agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3c792e10 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
who
>
>
|
|