1  ...  39  40  41  42  43  44  ...  78  |   Order by default

Jan 22, 2003, 4:31pm

"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in news:3e2dccc4$1
at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Hercules towers over the competition. :P

That's for amateurs :-D GeForce is the ruler!

KAH

Jan 23, 2003, 6:48pm

"dr strangelove" <drstrangelove at sverige.nu> wrote in
news:3e305447$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Test with different email address since my two email addresses are
> rejected... err...

Both your previous posts worked. You just need to refresh the article
listing to see them (press F5).

KAH

Jan 23, 2003, 7:12pm

"dr strangelove" <drstrangelove at sverige.nu> wrote in
news:3e30562d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Err... no, the first post was made by Bassa (thanks), which is how I
> found out that the email address mattered. If I were to try using
> sleepye at sverige.nu then my post will be rejected by the server. Had to
> create a new email address for use here, *shrug*

Looks like someone in Newburyport doesn't like you :-D

KAH

Jan 26, 2003, 8:56pm

"agent1" <agent1 at shatteredplatters.com.nospam> wrote in
news:3e33f066 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Not really. Many people use Microsoft server software without
> incident. In fact, Microsoft sent a Security Bulletin in July that
> described this very problem and provided a patch. Anything that
> happened after that is the fault of lazy system administrators.

Well, MS products are so full of bugs and exploits that MS release patches
and advisories every day, so it's rather hard to keep up with... I would
never even think of using an MS server, using their OSes is insecure enough
for me.

KAH

Jan 27, 2003, 8:52pm

"mrbruce" <A1CTWorld at aol.com> wrote in news:3e356cb0$1
at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Just a note, Tom (Flagg) is leaving AWI as of Febuary 6th 2003.
> Another good AW personality is leaving :( He will be sadly missed.

DOH! That's crap :-((

KAH

Mar 1, 2003, 12:56pm

"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in
news:3e602ea9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Anyone any good with php? I recently installed a php thing on my
> website, and it was all the files that the website installed, but it's
> comming up with a ton of disruptive little things saying something
> about errors, anyone know what I'm talking about, or want to help?

No, nobody knows what you're talking about lol. There are millions of PHP
scripts out there, and an equal ammount of possible errors, post the script
and the errors, along with config info and PHP version.

KAH

Mar 2, 2003, 10:51am

"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in
news:3e6166ac at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> all that, and I forgot to mention that it is PHP Nuke :-)

My guess is that you didn't read the installation instructions. For large
applications such as *Nuke you can't just drop the files and expect it to
work, there's a lot of DB setup, etc that has to be done first.

KAH

Mar 4, 2003, 2:49pm

"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in
news:3e63cd4c at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Standardized website layouts...ich. Customize it! :)

Just create your own theme, they give you quite a lot of freedom with the
feel and look of the site.

KAH

Mar 5, 2003, 3:36pm

"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in
news:3e652685$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> But who actually takes the time to do it? :P

Lots of people. It takes less time than writing the whole thing from
scratch too, and is good for people who don't program but know how to
design HTML.

KAH

Mar 3, 2003, 3:25pm

"dlp anne" <anne at dreamlandpark.com> wrote in
news:3e6377dd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Where do you see it's free?
> All I see is free patch upgrades for users that already have that
> version.
>
> Can also try AccuTrans 3D www.micromouse.ca

Just so that's clear, Accutrans is NOT free, even if the eval. is fully
working and without any forced expiration system :-))

KAH

Mar 3, 2003, 3:31pm

Hey, just wondering if anyone can recommend a good mail client for Win32
(CYGWIN will do too), as I'm tired of OE not working anymore, and as MS has
integrated it into the system I can't reinstall it properly either. It
doesn't really need a GUI if it's got a *good* command-line type shell
interface (such as PINE on UNIX).

Thanks in advance for any suggestions :-))

KAH

Mar 3, 2003, 3:32pm

"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in
news:Xns9333BC5C5D4D5kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201:

Forgot to mention, it'll need to support POP3 (some only support IMAP) as
that's what my mail scanner scans.

KAH

Mar 4, 2003, 2:57pm

"maki" <maki at awmaki.com> wrote in
news:3e63ff41$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> hehe, that's pretty funny. from looking at the forums on opera's
> website it seems many, many websites aren't compatible or even block
> the opera browser, I've never seen a website that blocks IE users -
> unless maybe it's some rebellious opera user, which I have also never
> seen. :)
>
> if all these websites seem to block opera browser when you can use IE
> and have just as well a visit, why waste your time emailing the site
> owners and standing up for a browser just to view a website? seems
> kind of stupid when I just open IE and can visit anywhere without a
> problem. :) maybe it's 'smaller and faster' but with computers today,
> I don't think a few megabytes of space is going to hurt you. IE loads
> just fine and fast for me. *shrug* my own opinion though, I have
> nothing against microsoft like many do.

No, it's not a compatibility issue. NS7 supports HTML 4.01 and XHTML
perfectly. That it doesn't happen to support MS's own mutant HTML version
is just as well in my view. IE loads fine for me too, but I still use NS7
because I feel like using quality software and not some insecure piece of
junk.

If they block users running non-IE browsers they're very stupid. If a site
doesn't work right for me in NS, I just won't visit it, too bad for the
site owner. Especially if it's a commercial site that'll want to sell me
something.

PS: Goober, what browser do you think I've used the last five years? :-D

KAH

Mar 6, 2003, 2:44pm

"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in
news:3e66d180$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> I dont know if it is just me, but everytime I try to run AW on my xp
> machine, I just have fatal errors left and right. I have fixed
> everything I know of, including the firewall. It just wont run and
> seems to always crash, and crash hard.
>
> Any ideas? Any one else having this problem?

Any info about your system? Video card for example.

KAH

Mar 7, 2003, 11:24am

"lady barbara" <barbeisner at msn.com> wrote in
news:3e6873be$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> What exactly is OpenGL?? It has been suggested to me a few times. I
> run AW on Win98SE. Sometimes I get those darn Aworld.ini errors
> toothat kick me out of AW! I have ATI Xpert99/Xpert2000 and according
> to the manual, etc. I have to continue running it on DirectX7 --NOT
> 8!!
>
> Is OpenGL slower, will I have same colors, etc.??? I've just switched
> Amberlin to "Huge". (BTW, thanks guys for that suggestion!)

OpenGL is 3D API (like DirectX/D3D). It's Open Source (thus the Open) and
cross-platform, in contrast to DirectX, which is proprietary and only
available (natively) on Win32 (DX8.1 and up is not even available on
win95). OGL can be faster in some cases and slower in others. It depends a
lot of your video card and how well it supports OGL. Just try it to see if
it'll do the business.

KAH

Mar 7, 2003, 5:59pm

"garnet" <red.garnet at verizon.net> wrote in
news:3e68db50$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> I'll leave it to those who can explain what OpenGL is better than I
> can :) All I know is that it isn't as good as Direct3D 8 was, and now
> when I use fog it makes water dissapear at certain angles.. or appear
> dark. You will find the choice to use OpneGL under Options>
> Settings>Viedo I hope you have better luck with it than I did :)

That'd be the RW3 implementation of OGL. I must enfacise that in reality
OGL really is superior to DX/D3D, but unfortunately RW3's implementation of
it isn't all too good. Would be neat if they switched to the QUAKE II
engine which is now GPL'ed :-D

KAH

Mar 9, 2003, 8:23am

"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in
news:3e6aea86$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> I would really like to know how RenderWare is getting along someday.
> Because it's gotta be worse than AW. Who even uses the engine for new
> products? I'm not dissing AW. They picked up the engine when it was
> still new and had a use.

Well, according to themselfes, RW is doing very well indeed. According to
this list:
http://www.renderware.com/customers_pages/customers_games_fr.htm
GTA III and GTA Vice City, among a lot of other big titles, are powered by
RenderWare. I'm not sure if this is a newer and improved version or wether
it's the 3D engine or the other tools they've developped under the
RenderWare brandname. For the price they payed to get the three RW3
engines, I bet they could've licensed the darn QIII engine, which is far
superior. Granted, it would take some conversion, but the switch to RW3 did
too.

KAH

Mar 7, 2003, 11:26am

"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in
news:3e67874f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

BAD BOWEN! BAD! You know what happens if you post about political,
religious and similar topics here!

KAH

Mar 7, 2003, 6:04pm

"count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in
news:3e68de96$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> I just find it suspisious that as soon as you get a new president,
> Iraque turns into a danger over one night.
> How come USA did not attack 1 year ago or 2 years ago?
> So basically, if you can have waited 2-3 years, a few months more will
> not hurt, will it ?

Bill Clinton was a democrat. George W. Bush is a republican. That's why.
They tried for a peacefull resolution during the nineties, you have to
acknownledge that. Iraq is not exactly keen to cooperate with the UN and
the rest of the world, there is some truth in the US and UK's dismissal of
the apparent Iraqui cooperation (that they're just playing games, first
saying they won't comply, then change direction at the last moment). The US
and UK did attacked Iraq 3 years ago too...

KAH

Mar 7, 2003, 9:32pm

"yami trunks" <Chris101d at attbi.com> wrote in
news:3e692784 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> http://www.petitiononline.com/ejectTW/petition.html
>
> Please many have been wronged by this theiving hacker, go here and
> sign it! Please Suport our cause in getting rid of this monster.!

Oh come on, I'm sure that person hasn't "hacked" anyone. Please don't post
to all newsgroups, especially as it's off-topic in most of them.

KAH

Mar 10, 2003, 3:10pm

"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in
news:3e6ba707$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> and Honestly, how on earth will a petition get AW to ban the dude?
> Have any petitions ever worked before?

Online petitions are really just a waste of time and bandwidth, as they
have no power, unlike a real petition.

KAH

Apr 12, 2003, 10:31am

"equin0x" <equin0x at activeworlds.com> wrote in
news:3e97578f at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> You cant spell, your attampt to kick him out is stupid and he is not a
> hacker. If he can hack Aw software, then...hell, im not even going to
> bother... He can't hack it.

And you don't know how to check the post date. The latest post in this
thread over a month old...

KAH

Mar 11, 2003, 4:31pm

"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
news:3e6e2586 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Have you seen how much those guys get paid who write those blasted
> calc functions!?

£1/hour?

KAH

Mar 10, 2003, 3:45pm

"lord perception" <usenetreplies at block.uce> wrote in
news:3e6c38ab at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> I've noticed that quite a large number of people link to pictures on
> us.f1.yahoofs.com which then redirects to bcvrf.yahoo.com. But I
> can't view any of them as bcvrf.yahoo.com returns a DNS error. I
> gathered this is some sort of Yahoo photo album site and is it
> accessible to only those in certain geographical regions such as the
> United States?

Well, it would surprise me if it was only available to people in the US,
but it could be a referrer thing. I'd need to URL where you'd normally find
the image to check that.

KAH

Mar 11, 2003, 4:30pm

"lord perception" <usenetreplies at block.uce> wrote in
news:3e6d32f3 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Well, here are a few example that I've seen linked to picture objects
> on various builds around the place.

Yes, I checked out the coords you provided in your post, but I couldn't
find the "right way" to access them (the page where they're meant to be
displayed).

KAH

Mar 18, 2003, 2:54pm

"truetome2" <TrueToMe2 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in
news:3e757430 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Ok, sorry if this takes up a lot of space but just thought you would
> like to see what some of our boys & girls have done to impress our
> enemies. I know I would be "very scared" if I looked up and saw this
> over head.

Sorry to puncture your little dream-bubble, but I can assure you that any
enemy soldiers who saw that thing approaching would've burst into laughter.
Why should they be scared of a chopper with a bold eagle painted on it? Do
you think they're sacred of the US? No, they're not. It probably would've
been to their best interest, but if they had been, they wouldn't be getting
ready for war, would they?

As JOKER SS pointed out, this doesn't even seem like anything that'll ever
go near combat, it'd be a pretty bad idea anyway (very visible). It's a
nice parade chopper though.

KAH
PS. I'm not anti-american, I just think you're being ridiculous now.

Mar 24, 2003, 2:56pm

"wizard myrddin" <wizard at rdescape.com> wrote in
news:3e7f17ba$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> Easyest way if you running unix based server is to cmod the folder and
> keep the noisey parkers out of it.

Nope. We're talking about images used on a webserver here, it won't help
changing the mode.

KAH

Mar 25, 2003, 2:38pm

"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in
news:3e7fc014$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> You can't protect them on the client side without writing a custom
> application to view them that does not allow saving and dows not allow
> screen captures. (a formitable task, not worth the benifits...)

You could still get it from memory.

KAH

Mar 25, 2003, 2:39pm

"r i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in news:3e7f8780$1
at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> If there was anything wrong with it id pick it up pretty quick cause im
> using Norton Corperate Edition (Latest) which is updated though Symantec
> System Center on my server daily and spred to all of my computers.

Not necessarily...

KAH

Mar 23, 2003, 9:58am

"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in
news:3e7d0193$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> that's what has been discussed, but we are really close now... in
> fact, sometimes a build a day comes out, signaling that we are
> pinpointing and finishing the little problems now. So, just be patient
> a little while longer *grin*

Haven't you been told it's bad to lie? :-D

KAH

1  ...  39  40  41  42  43  44  ...  78  |   Order by default