|
jerme // User Search
jerme // User Search
Oct 1, 2003, 5:40pm
I don't claim to be a mac person at all. I think I used a mac all of like 3
times in my entire life.
But, don't they make emulators for running windows apps?
-Jeremy
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f7b13a1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have a couple of friends who own macs, they are interested in checking
out
> aw but we know there is no mac client for that. We also know of the
> peacekeeper machelp page (which according to them is somewhat outdated for
> Jan 2002). My question is, are there ANY mac users in these ngs that are
> using aw? Or are mac people in aw just a myth? I would appreciate hearing
> from ya if you are out there! Thanks...
>
> Lady NightHawk
>
>
|
Oct 12, 2003, 6:42pm
Ohh, god.... not again.... *sigh*
Will you *please* shut-up? For the love of all that's good in this world,
SPARE US from your pointless pathetic arguments.
-Jeremy
[View Quote]"insanity" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3F898CC7.1456FF6E at privacy.com...
> Sad and morally deprived reply Andras... pertaining to your closing
lines...
> I would have expected you to have a higher level of thought process.
> As for your theft and public announcement of the direct copyright
infringement...
> Karma... Being able to steal... does not make the theft ok...
> As far as your comment "great stuff indeed" < Very fooish comment...
> All of the images are so greatly reduced their merit as textures for 3D is
nil.
> But you have shown this... You have shown that you lack moral fiber... and
you.. a competitive world host showing no respect to copyright. I certainly
would have nothing
> to do with a host that openly admits to stealing from the web. Hardly
would host my private and purchased goods with an admitted thief. Now at
least people see where your character is at and what it is.
> So it is true... even from bad things can come good... We are all now
better informed *S*
>
> InSaNiTy
> worldhosting.heartfall.com
>
>
> andras wrote:
>
respective builders solely.
an/or it's Treaties with foreign Nations.
restricted and anyone allowed to access it!
technique. This silly note means nothing:) Everything on this site is public
domain since it is not protected from the general public!
immediately" order, since it is a public server. What is more - I made a
full copy of this server on my machine:) - (geat stuff indeed!)
>
|
Nov 15, 2003, 3:15pm
Wait.. so you're saying the fate of AWI depends on A!!CT and a couple of odd
TV stations (if you can really call them that... more or less a slide show
to me)? Somehow I'm not following...
-Jeremy
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3fb44889$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> As I type this, I am sitting in my pub watching VWTV on one TV and CTV on
> the other. I read about the deparrture of MrBruce as a cit and A!!CT as a
> world, but I wonder what, if anything, will happen to CTV. CTV is an icon
> on A!!CT. In fact, it's the staple and signature of the world. Will all
of
> CTV's stuff be moved over to DFTV (which isn't nearly as much of an icon
as
> CTV is)? I also see ads of the 2004 Cy Awards on CTV. If CTV is supposed
> to bring us that event next year and it isn't around, who will pick it up?
> DFTV? I don't think so. VWTV? Me thinks Brock probably has enough on his
> plate IMHO :-)
>
> As many of you know, I set up a local CTV affiliate on Channel 8 in
> Hamsterville. I also set up a DFTV affiliate on Channel 4 as well. I
just
> saw an ad on CTV about selling some customizable (sp?) PHP script for CTV.
> I wonder how much good that would do if CTV leaves along with A!!CT and
> MrBruce. It took a LOT of guts and the editing of the description field
to
> suck up to Brock and VWBN, which I now have on Channel 5 as I sent SFTV
> packing for WHAM-TV Channel 11, which had been OFF THE AIR for weeks
> because, aside from VWTV, there is nothing to put on.
>
> If MrBruce finally does call it quits (and it's real), we can't exactly
> laugh this off. I know that Brock is just salivating to claim victory
over
> CTV (he's never been very high on CTV to begin with), but he's still got
> some rather stiff competion in DFTV though. As far as the rest of AW
goes,
> dare I say this, but it could be enough for E N Z O to start considering
> putting the proverbial DEATH KNELL on AWI. I say this because WHY should
E
> N Z O put HIS $$$ into a company which is already a sinking ship??
>
> Just something for everyone to think about....
>
> Cheers for now :-)
>
> PC Hamster
> Mayor - City Of Hamsterville
> Hamster Ground Zero Area - AW 5000N 272E
> NEW WEBSITE - http://hamsterville.tripod.com/
> pchamster at comcast.net
> Denver, Colorado (my REAL city :-))
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 11/3/2003
>
>
|
Nov 20, 2003, 1:47am
ummm... ok...
First off, where did *that* come from? And you shat in someone's bed? That's
kinda kinky... I'll leave that one alone.
Clams? Capaboo? Zandorfa?... I'm lost....
-J
[View Quote]"weebo" <weebo at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3fbc2bc3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I would like to announce I did get sick at Capaboo's one time up in Maine.
> It is something I have tried to forget. To shit on somebody's bed as a
guest
> is very most embarrassing and I have tried to forget this. I did have to
be
> rushed to the hospital that night with my breathing and puking. The doctor
> gave me something to relax and it did. I'm sorry again Capaboo for having
to
> bring this up again but somebody in AW keeps reminding me. So there
> community, let's hound this.
> Let's also talk about what the inside of Zandorfa looks like too. It too
> look like shit.
> So want to give me a hard time about clams, here ya go. I did have to tell
> my company about something they did not cover in insurance, they thought
it
> was funny.
> Maggie4Real was there and did save my life over it. I was just puking and
> shitting.
> Funny
> What reason do I have to stay in AW?
> I got more balls than Daphne let me tell you :)
> Weebo
>
>
|
Nov 21, 2003, 9:50pm
I see your point.... but what makes world owners think they're due something
from AWI just b/c they put a lot of time into their private world?
Are you saying they (the world owners) run off just becasue they didn't get
anything from AWI for their work? I mean, how was that ever part of the
deal?
Once you buy a world, you're on your own to develop it and shouldn't be
looking to AWI for freebies.
-Jeremy
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3fbe9f44 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It would be a good buisness tactic for AWI to do. Whoever is devoted to
> their world, keeps it running long enough, or has an overall good record
> (maybe other factors as well) AW could help support the world, maybe lower
> the price on it, or add a few extra coords for free. That would help keep
> the private worlds running, and fewer world owners running off in
> frustration because they got nothing in return from AWI from all the work
> they did on their own worlds.
>
>
|
Nov 24, 2003, 11:07pm
A group of several (3-4) people to moderate these groups more closely would
probably be a good thing.... Then again... there's *absolutely* no way that
AWI could keep things reasonable, as ep0ch illustrated. I have a fear that
it would turn into an extended version of AWGate, with the ridiculous and
whimsical judgments of some of those GKs.
-JerMe
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3fc2a83c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL I could see it now.
>
> "You have been ejected from the activeworlds newsgroups for saying 'ass'!"
>
> "ep0ch" <deltawolf at deltawolf.com> wrote in message
> news:3fc2a0c8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 24, 2003, 11:12pm
At least he managed to cover his tracks, somewhat....
> Received: from unknown ( at 192.168.60.3) by m1.netfirms.com with QMQP; Mon,
The 192.168.x.x IP range is reserved for internal LAN usage and isn't valid
on the open internet, thus it's invavlid to try an reverse DNS lookup on it
to determine his ISP. I'm sure your ISP (or whoever you get your e-mail
from) could trace the connection in their logs though. He simply managed to
spoof the SMTP headers.
-Jeremy
[View Quote]"baro" <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3fc2a0b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I just got a strange email from some hacker kidz or what ever they are
> called these days.
>
> "Be prepared for the stuff that will go down in AW sometime in the next
few
> months. You think it was bad before, there's new guys in town now to
avenge
> the wrongful doings against our friend. We are going to rip this place
apart
> and we are offering you front row tickets. If you think what people like
us
> have done in the past is bad, you just wait. This will rock AW to the
core.
> PREPARE FOR WAR!"
>
> sounds like yet another kid got ejected from awgate for cussing and
parents
> won't buy him a new ps2 so he has to feel special by using his amazing
> "hacking" skills (ie causing trouble via simple security holes). Well..
at
> least we have front row seats eh?
>
>
>
>
> Return-path: <anonymous at m1.netfirms.com>
> Received: from pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca
> (pd3mr1so-qfe2.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.162.177]) by l-daemon
> (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
> with ESMTP id <0HOV008JBRQ9F9 at l-daemon> for baronjutter at shaw.ca; Mon,
> 24 Nov 2003 16:54:09 -0700 (MST)
> Received: from pd2mi3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mi3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca
> [10.0.121.98])
> by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28
2003))
> with ESMTP id <0HOV00108RQ926 at l-daemon> for baronjutter at shaw.ca
> (ORCPT baronjutter at shaw.ca); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:54:09 -0700 (MST)
> Received: from m1.netfirms.com (m1.netfirms.com [66.48.76.114])
> by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28
2003))
> with SMTP id <0HOV00K4BRQ844 at l-daemon> for baronjutter at shaw.ca; Mon,
> 24 Nov 2003 16:54:09 -0700 (MST)
> Received: (qmail 69317 invoked from network); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:54:08
> +0000
> Received: from unknown ( at 192.168.60.3) by m1.netfirms.com with QMQP; Mon,
> 24 Nov 2003 23:54:08 +0000
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:54:08 +0000
> From: Venom at Anti-Activeworlds.com ()
> Subject: BE PREPARED AW CITIZEN
> To: baronjutter at shaw.ca
> Message-id: <20031124235408.41591.qmail at cgi2>
> X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
> Original-recipient: rfc822;baronjutter at shaw.ca
>
>
>
|
Dec 5, 2003, 6:17pm
>It isn't my duty to list every religion in the book simply because I don't
want to offend anyone.
You are exactly right. "Political Correctness" is such a load of crap....
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3fcefcc7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Nobody was being excluded when I said "christmas". If you are another
> religion, proudly state whatever you like to celebrate at this time.
Since
> I am catholic, I will say "christmas". It isn't my duty to list every
> religion in the book simply because I don't want to offend anyone. And
> please say Christmas, not xmas. And where are you quoting "convert" from?
I
> never said that.
> "sweet adora" <me at privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:3FCEF54F.34C6861A at privacy.net...
> only
trying
> to
> religion
your
> own.
> others?
> specifically. I
> everyone
preparing
> for.
> all
> It is
> wrongful to
> aren't
to
> do
> they
christmas,
> if
it
still
> specifically.
> Christmas
> christmas
> year?
>
>
|
Dec 13, 2003, 1:06pm
Don't hold me to this.... but..
There is no set distance from a sound that you have to be to hear it. It
all depends on the client's visability. If the object with the sound
command is rendered inside your visibility then the sound plays, as soon
as the object goes out of visbility the sound stops.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]lady nighthawk wrote:
> How close do you have to be to an object with sound in order to hear the
> sound? Like, if you are *this close* (in meters I assume) to a sound that
> plays automically (say waterfall for instance) you hear it, but not if you
> are farther away than. What is the optimum range an av should be in relation
> to an object to hear it well?
>
> LNH
>
>
>
>
|
Jan 25, 2004, 5:56pm
Out of all the posts i've seen... i have to say that this one is just
too histarically funny!
Where do you come up with this crap??
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]the lady wrote:
> This is a battle between good and bad - Good will win.
>
> The community has always been challenged in one way or another in AW. This
> is not a battle between certain named people or companies that show an
> interest in acquring AW. It is a battle between good and bad. It is a test
> of faith. It challenges my faith and your faith. We will not lose. We are
> a community of vast cultures, differences, but we will remain committed to
> seeing AW stay together. In order to do this, we must become a democracy.
> It has always been community, it will remain community. And we are winning.
> : )))) Already, we have people at AW GZ every night discussing the current
> situation. People are in agreement that we are a Community, we are here to
> stay!
>
> Our faith that God will help deliver our community of those forces who try
> to destroy - will not be diminished, nor will it be shaken. : )))) We
> Will Win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
|
Jan 26, 2004, 12:06am
> -_- I wonder if she really believes the stuff she says...
You know what's scary? I think she believes this crap.... :-?
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]mod wrote:
> And the prophet told in the time coming that the one who started it all
> shall arise from the universe ban ashes and save the vr worlds from the evil
> that is apparently battling good. Because ActiveWorlds is not a product...oh
> No, it is the evil breeding grounds for the most unholy evil of them all!
>
> -_- I wonder if she really believes the stuff she says...
>
> "the lady" <thelady263414 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:40140b8c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> This
>
>
> test
>
>
> are
>
>
> winning.
>
>
> current
>
>
> to
>
>
>
>
|
Jan 29, 2004, 3:06pm
Heh... it's freakin $7.50 (or maybe even $7.75 now) to get into the
movie theater where I live... And I probably do that twice a month.
So, good point Builderz, $6.95 really isn't all that much. Though, a
nice number like $5 would probably be better.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]builderz wrote:
> I don't usually reply to The Lady's posts, but I actually think that
> $6.95 per month is pretty darn cheap compared to other VR programs. Last
> I checked, There and A Tale in the Desert as well as Second Life. Most
> people spend more than $6.95 a month for coffee alone, going to movies,
> and many other things.
>
> Builderz
> http://www.3dhost.net
>
> the lady wrote:
>
|
Jan 31, 2004, 4:40pm
just don't say anything with ".exe" and you'll be ok....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]tart sugar wrote:
> 3i: you know the URL for the new beta?
> 3i: anyone?
> Jane. o: ya trying to trick me aren't ya 3i hehe
> 3i: no jane lol
> Tart Sugar: it's in the beginning when you first log in to AW
> Jane. o: yeah lol
> Chahta Sipokni: 3i, are you trying to get peopler to fall for that? hehehe
> 3i: thanks tart
> Tart Sugar: Welcome to the Active Worlds Universe! :) Version 3.5 is now in
> open beta!! Download the build 524 beta from here
> http://objects.activeworlds.com/downloads/awb35_beta.exe
> [Customs Aide]: You have been ejected for unacceptable language
> Immigration Officer: You have been ejected from awgate
>
> After my 5 minute time out, I went back to The Gate.
>
> Tart Sugar: SHEEESH!!!!!
> Jane. o: wb Tart Sugar hehe
>
> Even when I try to HELP, I get shot down. >: /
> *kicks puter* Stoopid bot
>
>
|
Jan 31, 2004, 4:39pm
Check out...
http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm
Unless you want some long and involved court procedings (which you
probably won't win) then you're stuck dealing with it. You should have
tried being nice first.....
In summary, to get the domain name, you need to prove the following:
- that the domain name in dispute is identical to or confusingly similar
to your trade mark
- that the Respondent (Wiz, in this case) has no rights or legitimate
interests in respect of that domain name; and
- that it has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
First, the CY Awards does not have a registered trade mark. Seconds, Wiz
may not have any legit interest in that domain name. Third, "bad faith"
means that he is using the domain name to disrupt your ability to carry
out business or defame/discredit your business. Since the CY's aren't
really a registered non-profit organization, and you don't make any
money.. he couldn't be disrupting your business.
As far as I see it... you're stuck. Deal.
Ohh, and on a side note.... When I began working on the AWTeen site, I
bought awteen.com straight out. But AWTeen.net and .org were owned by
others. Andras owns one.. I simply asked and he redirected it to
awteen.com instead of his site. The other domain the owner offered to
sell to me for what it was worth with the remaining time left on it.
It's amazing what happens when you simply ask... :-)
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
> Ummm...forget my last post...however...I will state that I think that is
> pretty bad to use something that is so popular in AW to redirect folks to
> your URL.
> Am I pissed? Yeppers:)
> But only because you are misleading the community in AW to benefit yourself.
> And all this time I was under the impression you and Linn didn't support the
> Cys...ermm....it's different if they benefit you eh?:)
> Your colors have been shown dear:)
> I am going to look into the legal aspects of all this. Not sure if I have a
> leg to stand on since you are in the UK.
> But it's worth the try!:)
> I do believe that organizations can get their legal names released to them
> if a person is using it to lead folks astray...we will see:)
> If you would like to voluntarily redirect that url to
> www.awcommunity.org/cyawards we can forget all about this:)
>
>
>
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit2003 at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:401be1da$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
Jan 31, 2004, 5:58pm
I think I should set some terminology straight here...
You copyright content and works of art. For example, the content and
design of the AWI web site (www.activeworlds.com) is copyrighted. One
can not (legally) copy the content of that site and use it without
written consent form AWI or without using it under "fair-use".
Copyrights are provided to prevent others from unfairly claiming or
using what one has created.
You trademark names and slogans. (The name "JTech Web Systems" cannot be
copyrighted.) So, for example.. the name of the popular discount
department store "Wal-Mart" is trademarked. Their slogan "Always low
prices. Always." is also trademarked, as well as their logo. Trademarks
are registered in order to prevent other business from using a name or
logo which could confuse the public or discredit the original business.
Since the "CY Awards" is not a registered trademark of any business or
non-profit organization, it can be used by whomever, wherever.
The rules/policies that control domain name disputes only recognize
registered trademarks, for obvious reasons.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]ihnk wrote:
> when you create something you automatically get its copyright, especially
> names :P
>
> "wizard myrddin" <admin at rdescape.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:401bf545$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Mar 1, 2004, 6:25pm
> They don't flame for posting something that might not need to be
fixed. And
> if you are a flamer, your posting privileges are taken away.
See, that's just the problem... Opening up the beta NG allows people
(like you) to carry off-topic and unnecessary posts into the beta NG. As
Xelag pointed out, this forces to the dev team to wade though many many
useless posts, before they actually find something worth reading.
It also allows flamers and the like to participate in the beta NG. This
means we get those threads that are entirely too long and are composed
of messages amounting to no more than one-line flames. (Which the dev
team also has to wade though). This requires the dev team to spend time
moderating the newsgroup, instead of fixing bugs and adding features.
In short, keeping the beta ng private provides higher quality bug
reports from knowledgeable members of the community while cutting the
nonsense that is evident in other groups.
Regards,
Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]the lady wrote:
> Beta seems to have become a place of exclusion to people interested in
> testing the AW software. It's wrong. AOL has it's own newsgroup away from
> other newsgroups regarding their beta. They have a whole lot of testers.
> They don't flame for posting something that might not need to be fixed. And
> if you are a flamer, your posting privileges are taken away. If you don't
> encourage people to post problems, the software can't be perfected and sent
> out in good quality. It needs to be more freely accessible to those
> interested in participating. Those who personally attack someone in the
> newsgroup, should be omitted from participating. Beta can become it's own
> little community within the community if it is friendly to its participants,
> does not tolerate personal attacks within the group, and good communication
> established between the programmers and the testers.
>
> AW please strive to make your beta the best beta it can be. : )
>
> "the lady" <thelady263414 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:40429483 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 4, 2004, 1:33am
I think you're going to have to clarify that a little bit. :-)
Do you have an example of a page I can take a look at?
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
> Ok...here's the scenario.
> On one of my web pages, I have other pages that when you hit "refresh" it
> automatically sends you back to the default.html.
> Another weird thing it is doing is if I want to send a person to a different
> html than the default html, they get an error message of that "inside" html
> not being accessible?
> I checked my html text and nothing there looks like it would be causing it.
> And I believe my url forwarding is correct also on our domain name server.
> Help please!?:)
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Bit:)
>
>
|
Mar 4, 2004, 2:30am
I see www.bitmebaitandtackle.com's IP as 63.251.83.54. It looks like the
server is running Apache with name-based virtual hosting.
[JerMe at www JerMe]$ host www.bitemebaitandtackle.com
www.bitemebaitandtackle.com has address 63.251.83.54
So, looking up that IP directly gives an error message from the server
b/c it doesn't know which domain to use.
What IP did you use mongo?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]mongo wrote:
> If it's any help in deciphering this problem, I'm able to access the page by
> manually altering the URL to refer to the
> http://64.217.xx.xxx/bmbat/blanco.html as the URL, rather than the actual
> URL you posted. I've had similar problems before when my domain name host
> forwarded into webspace. I'd only be able to access the root index.html, no
> pages below that. I don't know how your domain name is hosted, so I can't
> speak to that. Hope that helps.
>
>
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit2003(NOSPAM) at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:4046a4ba$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> links
>
>
> causing
>
>
>
|
Mar 10, 2004, 6:52pm
Will you people just freaking give it up?? It's not that big of a
deal... It's just a little chat program. Turn the computer off and go
for a walk in the park.
Jesus.. You are worse than a bunch of 5th graders. GROW UP!!!
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]princess nerwen wrote:
> Return-Path: <AntiHomo69 at boxfrog.com>
> Received: from www.boxfrog.com ([64.214.129.129]) by fed1mtai09.cox.net
> (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with
> SMTP
> id
> <20040310042915.NLER18065.fed1mtai09.cox.net at www.boxfrog.com>
> for <jennifer755 at cox.net>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:29:15 -0500
> Received: (qmail 71001 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Mar 2004 04:37:21 -0000
> Message-ID: <20040310043721.70953.qmail at www.boxfrog.com>
> From: "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com>
> To: jennifer755 at cox.net
> Subject: Your going to get what you deserve on Active Worlds.
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:37:19 -0600
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Return-Path: <AntiHomo69 at boxfrog.com>
> Received: from www.boxfrog.com ([64.214.129.129]) by fed1mtai09.cox.net
> (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with
> SMTP
> id
> <20040310042915.NLER18065.fed1mtai09.cox.net at www.boxfrog.com>
> for <jennifer755 at cox.net>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:29:15 -0500
> Received: (qmail 71001 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Mar 2004 04:37:21 -0000
> Message-ID: <20040310043721.70953.qmail at www.boxfrog.com>
> From: "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com>
> To: jennifer755 at cox.net
> Subject: Your going to get what you deserve on Active Worlds.
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:37:19 -0600
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Did you like the E-Mail I told everyone that was from you in the
> Newsgroups?
> I can't stand you and I will spend everyday doing these things to hurt
> you.
> You are a sick individual with your wannabe bitch attitude. When you
> ever
> get the money for the surgery I hope you die on the table when they are
> in
> mid cut of your dick.
>
> Everyone will believe me over you because no one believes a freak.
>
> Fuck You,
> Linn
>
> eturn-Path: <AntiHomo69 at boxfrog.com>
> Received: from www.boxfrog.com ([64.214.129.129]) by fed1mtai01.cox.net
> (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with
> SMTP
> id
> <20040310011434.NJUR2428.fed1mtai01.cox.net at www.boxfrog.com>
> for <jennifer755 at cox.net>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:14:34 -0500
> Received: (qmail 55536 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Mar 2004 01:22:40 -0000
> Message-ID: <20040310012240.54784.qmail at www.boxfrog.com>
> From: "Strike Rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk>
> To: jennifer755 at cox.net
> Subject: On Behalf Of All Activeworlds Citizens...
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:22:21 -0600
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Keep your shit out of the NGs. We have enough idiot posters as it is and
> we
> do not need a freak like you talking to AW's youth. No one is directly
> attacking you with worms or trying to invade your system but so help me
> god
> if you don't shut the fuck up I will be forced to do so.
>
>
> Return-Path: <ironhead at digitalpassage.com>
> Received: from digitalpassage.com ([67.99.216.7]) by fed1mtai02.cox.net
> (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with
> ESMTP
> id
> <20040310023113.QDLH2427.fed1mtai02.cox.net at digitalpassage.com>
> for <jennifer755 at cox.net>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:31:13 -0500
> Received: from lindasrevenge [67.99.221.9] by digitalpassage.com
> (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADE7332D009C; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:31:03 -0600
> From: "Linda Ainsworth" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com>
> To: "princess nerwen" <jennifer755 at cox.net>
> Subject: RE: DON'T POSS ON THE ACTIVE WORLDS NEWSGROUPS AGAINST ME
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:36:07 -0600
> Message-ID: <LOBBIHNOFNJAMPAEJIPOIEKNCKAA.ironhead at digitalpassage.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> Importance: Normal
> In-Reply-To: <20040310011743.41571.qmail at www.boxfrog.com>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 67.99.221.9
> with no reverse DNS entry.
>
> dont threaten me again!! this has been posted so we all can see what YOU
> know how to do
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: princess nerwen [mailto:jennifer755 at cox.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 7:18 PM
> To: ironhead at digitalpassage.com
> Subject: DON'T POSS ON THE ACTIVE WORLDS NEWSGROUPS AGAINST ME
>
>
> I have had it up to here with idiot bitches like you criticizing my
> posts on
> the NGs. If you don't agree with me then don't post at all because I do
> not
> want to hear it. This your first and final warning. Next time I won't be
> so
> nice. I will show you my motherboard frying skills next time.
>
> Does this look familiar?
> 67.99.220.233
> It should!
>
>
>
|
Mar 11, 2004, 12:42am
I couldn't care less who started it. One of them needs to grow the hell
up and be man (or woman, in this case) enough to stop it.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]themask wrote:
> Princess Nerwen started all this trouble, and PK's dont do much at all.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
>
> http://www.delusional-minds.com
>
> "jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:404f800b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 11, 2004, 12:50am
ENZO please delte this useless thread and ban all parties named in the
origional post from the newsgroups.
If this is the limit to how mature these people can act, then frankly
they don't deserve to have posting rights.
It's time to take a stand and get crap like this out of the NG's.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
Mar 11, 2004, 1:14am
I just received notice from our co-location facility of a maintenance
window coming up.
During this maintenance window a new ISP will be added to the existing 3
ISPs that server the co-location facility's network. Once the new
circuit (an OC3) is added, testing will be conducted to ensure that the
ISPs will fail over properly.
Date: Sunday, March 21, 2004
Time: 12:01AM - 8:00AM EST
The notice states that this could result in occasional outages for short
periods of time during the above maintenance window. This means that any
worlds and object paths hosted with JTech Web Systems could be subject
to downtime.
I apologize for the inconvenience; however, this one is really out of my
hands. :o)
Regards,
Jeremy
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
Mar 14, 2004, 6:22am
What's the big secret? It's not like I didn't get the same e-mail,
probably along with half the other well known names here.....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]xelag wrote:
> Sorry, John, I will only send details to caretakers.
>
> On 13 Mar 2004 19:38:31 -0500, "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com> wrote:
>
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 12:16am
Nope, doesn't look like there's any virus included in that.
It seems to be the actual rwx file complete with all the textures.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]alaskanshadow wrote:
> Just got another stupid email from with an attachment..may not want to
> download it. The script kiddy probably attached a virus, and even if its not
> a virus, its disrespectful to the avatars creator to download the avatar
> mentioned:
>
> Tsk Tsk Tsk. You all had to brag in the Newsgroups about the PHP Scripts and
> pretty muched beg us to show you that even PHP Scripts are not helpful. And
> to prove that...we ripped Lady Mur's new $50 Leprachaun Avatar even though
> its supposed to be protected by CodeWarrior's "1337" PHP Script. Sorry AW,
> You Lose!
>
> So Consider The Avatar Included In The Attachment An Early St. Patrick's Day
> Gift From Your Favorite Eastern Europe Hacker, Chris Stevens.
>
> ~The Death Squad~
>
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 6:15pm
It's not *that* hard to "get the goods" as you put it...
All you need is a facility whereby you can form your own http headers
(specificly the user-agent header). A normal browser can't do this. PHP
can... Given a little inginuity, I'm sure you could turn the PHP script
on itself, so to speak. Use a PHP script to form a request for the
files, setting the user-agent header as needed, and submit that request
to the all holy PHP path script.
The problem is we can only check the user-agent header, which can be
spoofed as described above.
What we need is some from of authorization between the activeworlds
server and the web server. The web server needs to be able to verify
that any given request is coming from an AW browser, and not any other
program. A possible way to impliment this could be a version of the AW
server that interfaces with the webserver though an Apache module. This
would allow the server to work out a simple challenge/response system.
The browser get "session-id" of sorts from the aw server, and then
submits that with each request to the web server. The webserver can
verify this though its awserver module and decide whether it should
allow access to the file or not. The session-id would have to be
encrypted in some form or fassions to prevent sniffing, and would have
to change with *every* request to the server.
That's only half the story though... A system somewhat like what is
described above has a sole purpose of insuring that only a AW browser
can download the files. Eventully, the files have to be stored
somewhere on the local system for the purpose of caching. To combat this
threat, strong encrypting (128 bit) with public/private keys and pass
phrases should be used. This would mean, without being able to intercept
a key, it would take hours upon hours of brute force hacking time to
unzip the file (as opposed to several minutes, or just seconds now). So,
if someone did in fact get a hold of the OP files, they still couldn't
open or use them without a lot more effoft.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]codewarrior wrote:
>
> and
>
>
> And
>
>
> Day
>
>
>
> It's important to note that this person had to email the avatar to
> everyone. Simply giving out the password to Lady M's OP was
> not sufficient as it would have been in the past.
>
> Giving out passwords is no longer sufficient to cripple someones
> ability to protect their intellectual property. Someone will have
> to go into the business of obtaining, hosting and distributing the
> illegal files if they want to be taken seriously as a 'threat'
>
> Can you see these kind of people in future emailing everyone
> *all* of the files from *all* of the paths? If everyones path
> were protected with some level of scripting so that only
> hackers have the ability to obtain the files, then the hackers
> will have to do a lot more work, spend a lot more bandwidth
> actually stealing and distributing the files than they do now by
> simply emailing everyone a list of passwords.
>
> With server side security, the game is changed. In the old days,
> cowards used to give out passwords, and reasonably honest people
> used to go and help themselves, or simply hijack the OP path
> completely and use it directly in their own worlds.
>
> Now, even if you know someones password, you still have to
> get your hands dirty obtaining the content. You used to be able
> to just help yourself to the goodies... now you have to pick the
> lock to get at the stuff, and 99% of the people who *might* take
> the stuff if it is just sitting there won't have a clue how to do that.
>
> They have proven that "PHP scripts are helpful". They sent out a
> list of passwords, and a lot of people are capable of going to those
> peoples paths, downloading the files with an ordinary web browser,
> and unpacking and using the contents. Since the files from most
> OPs can be obtained by simply going there with a normal browser,
> it is difficult to enforce any sort of concept of said files not
> being intended for public availability.
>
> But they had to actually go and get Lady M's avatar and email it
> to everyone because they know that very few people will be capable
> of going and getting it themselves. Lady M finds that helpful, and
> it's not their place to decide what she finds helpful.
>
> And they should quit pretending that this is somehow between them
> and AW. They are not doing any harm to AW, they are harming nice
> people who have kids and who struggle to put a little extra bread on the
> table now and then. There is no nobility in what they do to these
> people. They are no better than street thugs who mug old ladies
> for their Bingo money, and at least street thugs have the balls to look
> their victims in the eye when they rob them.
>
> But thanks to their publicity, I had three people email me to enquire
> about protecting their OP paths.
>
> And Lady M also informs me that she has never had so many people
> inquire about purchasing an avatar until this latest blatant attempt
> at poisoning commerce within the AW community.
>
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 8:13pm
> And you obviously haven't actually done it since it
> won't work.
....Don't challenge me... :-)
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]codewarrior wrote:
> Well if you think it is that simple, who am I to argue.
>
> But you have proved my point. Most people don't have a clue
> how to write a PHP script to do what you describe.
>
> And you obviously haven't actually done it since it
> won't work.
>
> "jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:40560ef9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 9:31am
See, this is just what i was talking about in another thread.
A way of associating each request with a citnumber, name, world, etc,
would be exactly what we need.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]ry wrote:
> Good Idea,
> Also it would be good to post (under this thread) any new IP
> addresses/Proxy's/ISP's he is under so we can keep ourselves aware and up to
> date!
>
> The Mask, have you emailed AWInc?
>
|
Mar 28, 2004, 5:54pm
Obviously not....lol
And if she hasn't realized it already, I don't think she's ever going to.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]strike rapier wrote:
> Some Lady Wrote:
>
>
>
> Do you not stop to think "Hmmm.... Perhaps im getting annoying and am
> probably filtered from most peoples email systems by now... Perhaps I should
> stop wasting my, and other peoples time"
>
> - MR
>
>
|
Apr 1, 2004, 8:58am
Immigration Officer: Attention all citizens! As a result of the recent
OPEC oil cuts, we will need to cut costs & conserve energy by
implementing rolling blackouts of AW. These will occur daily at 11AM,
2PM, 6PM, & 9PM. We appreciate your cooperation and understanding.
nice one Rick....
-J
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
Apr 16, 2004, 6:14pm
Recovering a zip password is much faster if you have an unzipped copy of
the file.
There are algorythems that can compare the origional copy to the zipped
(and passworded) file and use that to aide in discovering the zip password.
This is why you get the advice not to zip files with a password that are
freely available elsewhere on the net. No matter how long/strong your
password is, it can be easily cracked if there is an non-password
protected version available.
-Jeremy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeremy Booker - Owner / Webmaster
JTech Web Systems
www.JTechWebSystems.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
[View Quote]zeofatex wrote:
> Yeah it will, but it takes hours heh
>
> You mean brute forcing it?
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:40802a2e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> have
>
>
> the
>
>
>
|
|