1  ...  9  10  11  12  13  14  ...  101  |   Order by default

Apr 25, 2004, 6:22am

[View Quote] [View Quote] Outcoding.. woo.

Aug 17, 2004, 4:47pm

[View Quote] That's all well and good, but how about you make one thread pertaining
to your bot and respond there. As opposed to the 30 that you created
before.

If anyone was really interested in it, they'd read the thread -- no need
to spam the newsgroups with your bot news. (unless it's months between
updates, then it may be okay)

That's my NNTP peeve for your HTML-in-NNTP peeve.

Aug 17, 2004, 5:38pm

[View Quote] > I am very sorry my last post over a month ago, which will have been
> disgarded by most OE newsreaders now on default settings upsets you Bowen...
> (No, honestly, I am! lol) However personally I only see 6 threads?

Yes, in sucssesion too. It's too bad constructs such as sarcasm and
exageration are completely lost on you.

If only I knew what disgarded meant; but in the case you meant
disregarded (or discarded), you shouldn't expect people to be using your
newsreader, or your settings. Hey, you don't like HTML, I don't like
constant posts about a simliar topic. The very same reason why I'm not
all too favorable with Hu

I'm just trying to save myself from seeing another 5 threads pertaining
to the same topic just to address bug-fixes. I'm sure it doesn't matter
to you.

Nov 2, 2004, 3:55pm

[View Quote] Then they shouldn't be stupid and allow all bots to enter.

Nov 5, 2004, 5:22pm

[View Quote] Think outside the box John. Sometimes you have to implement your own
code to check if something is doable.

http://activeworlds.com/sdk/aw_world_list.htm

AW_WORLDSTATUS_PRIVATE in particular

Now, if it's private, you can check if it's not private then enter it.

On to the next part of the code.

http://activeworlds.com/sdk/AW_EVENT_WORLD_ATTRIBUTES.htm

AW_WORLD_BOTS_RIGHT

Now check if * is the bot rights to the world. If it is, go ahead.

There is a better way of doing this. Having the server contact the
world and gathering the info (I think Xelag metioned this).

Nov 6, 2004, 1:12am

[View Quote] Then it all comes down to using an account that isn't the universe
caretaker. Easy to do. And to keep from trying every world, you would
still need to check if it's private or not.

I would think it would be easiest to just write a server function to
this though. Then you can query information from closed worlds.

Nov 14, 2004, 3:28pm

[View Quote] "gcc file.c" will give you the default a.out file.

I think gcc -o client file.c is how you change it, you then, of course,
would ./client to run the bot.

Nov 14, 2004, 3:51pm

[View Quote] I think they need to be in /usr/lib then all you'd need to do is go gcc
-o client -law_sdk source.c

I'm not sure if it works the same on BSD, which seems to be what you're
using.

Apr 4, 2003, 12:49am

[View Quote] You have to reset the newsgroup and make sure you download all headers. So, pretty
much just reset.

--Bowen--

Oct 27, 2001, 11:11pm

Yeah this does seem like a neat idea.. :) Though, this is likely to be
flammed by IA.

--Bowen--
[View Quote]

Oct 29, 2001, 6:22pm

A linux version of AW would be great.. WINE'ing a program has some
disadvantages compared to something written specifically for Linux. I'm
sure I'm not the only one out there. Anyways that's my wish :)

--Bowen--

Oct 30, 2001, 6:17pm

LoL that's true, even 3.1 beats having XP on your system.. so many security
risks to it. Linux works on Mac! Better hardware compatibility too, since
everything used by the new macOSX has to be unix compatible (OSX is a unix
based OS) :) I don't think it's going to be made though, Roland uses
Windows based functions with AW.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Oct 31, 2001, 9:06pm

RWX is fine, it's one of the easiest, non bloated 3d object scripts to get
into. TS takes a lot of time to render since they contain a lot of
non-essential polygons, same with 3ds max, and lightwave. Since it has to
be done in real time.. the smaller and the simpler the better. That's why a
lot of worlds are laggy.. they contain TS's objects (unless they're not good
with RWX, not that all TS objects get this bad).

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Oct 31, 2001, 9:20pm

Yeah I forgot RW dropped RWX a while back. If AW made their own.. they'd be
spending about 2 years in development so that'd not be worth it.. although
it might be faster in some areas.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Oct 29, 2001, 9:39pm

That would be a cool feature :) I think in 2.2 you could do that, I know
one of them you could.

--Bowen--
[View Quote]

Oct 29, 2001, 9:49pm

The land might have to be pre covered first with a certain object, maybe?

--Bowen--
[View Quote]

Oct 29, 2001, 9:58pm

LoL yeah I'm doing some work tonight so I've got not a lot better to do :).
Maybe some sort of marker system where you set it off with 4 objects like
posts?

--Bowen--
[View Quote]

Nov 1, 2001, 11:31pm

A linux GUI based server instead of the text based on that you need the
Windows administrator to add worlds.. have a linux one where you can add
worlds yourself. It would be a great addition.

--Bowen--

Nov 5, 2001, 1:19am

Ok I'm lost on what this whole thing is.. and what brandon is trying to say.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 5, 2001, 4:57pm

OK then, let me tell you that AW MAKES CHAT LOGS. Sorry but I can't handle
people that tell me I'm stupid then don't realize that you can do it with a
click of a few buttons. And you can stop it very easily when you're done.
That is why I didn't understand why you'd need another program to do it for
you.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 5, 2001, 7:34pm

Then use a bot, simple as that.. there's no need for another program to be
written when a bot can do it. Xelagot for example, they can make chatlogs.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 6, 2001, 3:32pm

Maybe one of the great bot writers could throw something together like that.
With some extra features.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 6, 2001, 3:53pm

LoL there's not too much I can think a chatbot would need.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 6, 2001, 4:02pm

chatlogbot my bad

[View Quote]

Nov 6, 2001, 7:55pm

If it's really a problem I can host your world for you, if that's all you
need. I see you're having lots of problems :)

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 6, 2001, 8:01pm

LoL that would be a nice feature, I'd hate it if someone came in and started
messing with my stuff.. well if you do want me to host it just give me a
buzz.. it's no problem for me.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 13, 2001, 5:07pm

But as soon as the person who wants to use the computer starts it back up,
the worlds would restart.. if it runs like that.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Nov 27, 2001, 5:37pm

Well considering it's not a game.. some people just log off if they're going
away for an extended time. But if someone thinks it's rude that someone
doesn't respond to a telegram right off, that's their problem.. not everyone
has the time to spend responding to people every second ;). People should
be aware of that. But it would be a nice feature to have.. the AFK icon :).

--Bowen--

Nov 27, 2001, 6:00pm

There's some people who would take his name while he was afk knowing some of
the wackos in AW. Just to get him mad.

--Bowen--

Dec 4, 2001, 11:35pm

Some of the companies in Europe charge by the MB. It's not a problem here
in the US unless you have a commercial OC line in which case it's by the
gigabyte I think.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

1  ...  9  10  11  12  13  14  ...  101  |   Order by default