|
|
bowen // User Search
bowen // User Search
Dec 6, 2004, 4:36pm
[View Quote]c p wrote:
> bowen wrote:
>
>
> how would i know?
|
If it's newer than half a year it'll probably have it. No guaruntees.
Check the motherboard manual. And you'll need a beefy power supply for
a new video card that runs on PCI-E usually.
Nov 24, 2004, 12:41am
[View Quote]jerme wrote:
> Since none of the other AWTeen CTs have commented on this, I'll go ahead
> and throw a few comments out regarding this matter....
>
> First, I wasn't the one who ejected you, so I don't presume to say
> whether this was a "just" or "unjust" ejection.
>
> However, I will say that I have received multiple complaints regarding
> harassment from at least two individuals. I would also venture to say
> that from my observations at ground zero over the past week, you had
> made yourself out to be a general nuisance. Admittedly, that is not a
> valid reason for an ejection, but I'd say it's probably the straw that
> broke the camel's back.
>
> Judging from the complaints and the "following avatars around"
> (borderline harassment), I would reason that some questionable chat was
> enough to warrant an eject.
>
> But, I do not have all the facts and I wasn't there... Thus, I cannot
> conclusively say whether your ejection was reasonable or not.
>
> However, I would say that this (posting in a public ng) is hardly the
> way to go about questioning your ejection. For future reference (for you
> and anyone else), the best way is to start by contacting one of the
> AWTeen CT directly by e-mail/telegram first.
|
As long as it falls under chat that would be allowable in a normal
teenage discussion, I don't think it would warrent an ejection. As long
as it doesn't get too far from the point and is unstructured, there is
very little that should be ejected for. If someone bothers you, use
mute, not eject. Simple as that.
Dec 3, 2004, 12:41am
[View Quote]strike rapier wrote:
> I am afraid you will all have to put up with C P being well, an idiot... he
> got suspended from a team for threatening to destroy all its work... so he
> is a little pissed at me.
|
That's what happens when you put an idiot in charge of a team of idiots.
Yeah, I said it.
Dec 7, 2004, 1:01am
[View Quote]garnet wrote:
> Well... it seems to be ok now.. I dont know what happened.. but Ive been
> keeping an eye on it since the sale. I suppose it could have been some kinda
> internet fluke? Anyway its ok .. phew
> Garnet
|
You probably ran two instances of the world server.
Dec 14, 2004, 12:40am
[View Quote]joeman wrote:
> 1.5GB? Wow... Uh, last propdump sent to ima was around 16GB. GZIP
> (really thing only zipping application on a native solaris install) has
> a compression rate of 71.1% on text. 16 * 1024^3 = 17179869184 Bytes *
> .711 = 12214886989.824 / 1024^3 = 11.376GB... Over a T1, with a
> theoritical speed of 1.54 mbps (never will this be achieved due to the
> TCP/IP overhead, but lets pretend for a second.) Lets move GB to MB, so
> 11.376 * 1024 = 11649.024MB, 11649.024MB * 8 = 93192.192Mb. 93192.192Mb
> by 1.54Mb/s works out to somewhere around 60514 seconds, which is 1008
> minutes, or 16 hours. Theres 16 hours of time that there internet
> connection is totally used up. But, lets think reality here, they're
> running object servers, uniservers, worldservers, all off the same
> connection, so lets be nice and throttle the speed down to 400kbps
> (you'd be lucky to get that even). At 400kbps (I dont even get this
> uploading at work to T1's, and where I work's on an OC8 on three
> backbones), it would take 66 hours. 66 hours... thats a few days. This
> isnt even taking the time it takes to dump the world (probably in excess
> of 10 hours), then gziping it up. So, in total, it would take over a
> few days to send a propdump of AW to ima.
|
bz2 works better.
Dec 14, 2004, 10:33pm
[View Quote]swe wrote:
> but don't you only get the "introductionary" version with student? i figured
> this was just a multiuser license or soemthing O_O
|
No, you're just restricted on how you can use it publically.
Dec 14, 2004, 10:35pm
[View Quote]the j0k3r ss wrote:
> *shrug* i had a "copy"of it before anyway , ugh , i dont feel like switching
> to .NET , object orientated in VB ??????
|
Wasn't VB always object oriented, just that the user never had access to it?
Dec 14, 2004, 11:07pm
[View Quote]strike rapier wrote:
> Kinda... you could put some OOP into it using class objects and most of the
> interface was based around objects, but the main code 'appeared' to be
> procedural.
|
Yeah that's what I thought.
Dec 15, 2004, 3:56am
[View Quote]strike rapier wrote:
> http://zetech.swehli.com/pics/too_many_files.jpg
>
> On large projects its far far easier to use VB's class-type system to go
> putting information together, the only problem being only 1 class per
> file...
|
Reminds me of Java.
Dec 14, 2004, 7:04pm
[View Quote]alexthemartian wrote:
> it can still be javascript date and give us correct status info. but it does
> not, lol
|
They'd actually have to have some scripts that test the status of the
servers. Wouldn't take much work. Maybe generate the information once
an hour.
Dec 15, 2004, 11:12pm
God who the hell cares, take your homosexually needed play to places
that are designed for them.
Places like AWRPG are not places for homosexual displays. They're not
even places for generic sexual displays. This includes the "European
smooch" that many European nations do, the kiss on each cheek.
If you feel the need to be homosexual, there are plenty of online chat
sites designed for you.
Dec 16, 2004, 3:23am
[View Quote]alaskanshadow wrote:
> I agree with Rossy-People are taking their religious biases too far. What
> harm can allowing homosexuals in AWRPG bring? not a damn thing. You can't
> procreate in virtual reality. You don't get legally married over the
> internet. Hell their RPG gods aren't even considered 'real', so why is this
> such a big moral issue? Seriously, why do RPGers feel the need to control
> every petty little detail of someone's personal life on a 3d chat of all
> things? When did it become so hard to respect someone's lifestyle choice in
> RL and put your fake, 'medieval' morals aside? This just furthers my belief
> that AWRPG is cult-like.
|
It has no place in a public world with children. Personal life is just
that, a personal life. We don't need personal mingling with virtual.
If you want to have relations with the same sex, do it in your personal
life, leave virtual to what it should be. Show affection accordingly,
there's no need for sexual displays at all in a virtual world.
|
