|
|
swe // User Search
swe // User Search
Sep 18, 2002, 12:15pm
you dont like my rhyme? ok, well i guess thats fine. while you sit and
whine, bah, theres only soo much you can rhyme and make sense at the same
time
[View Quote]"elyk" <KFoerst at telocity.com> wrote in message
news:3d87c569$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I hate rhymes. ;P
> "swe" <swe at emptyco.com> wrote in message
> news:3d878c7d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> world
world)
little
>
>
|
Sep 18, 2002, 12:19pm
lol! no, i mean like a button, which when you press, downloads the whole
propdump, or if you want, a certain squared area around you. do you can
choose like 50coords in each direction, and it will download that.
alpha world propdump is 8 GB? holyshit! what the hell they putting in there?
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3D884BF8.4B4BE310 at andras.net...
> Last time I get one it was an excess of 8 GBytes!!
> Andras
>
>
> ananas wrote:
world
world)
little
|
Sep 18, 2002, 12:22pm
lol, dont know about you guys, but when i see someone on my contact list
with a question mark next to his name, i see at as either he/she think im
annoying and talk too much, or im not on there contact list. so i take em
off lol.
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:3d88034e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> thats why we have a "hide" button
> "einga" <tatita37 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3d880097$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
isn't
> with
> them
>
>
|
Sep 18, 2002, 12:54pm
lol, well i still take them off. dont see the point of privacy anyway.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
news:3d889147$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> and as usual your prolly wrong on BOTH accounts.
>
> Look at the question mark as strickly an "anti-social" behaviour....;)
>
> Leo :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at emptyco.com> wrote in message
news:3d888c19 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
im
em
conversation
to
>
>
|
Sep 19, 2002, 9:52am
no, not really, the only reason companies have beta testing, is so that
there users dont get annoyed with all the bugs. so if beta is public, and
people choose to upgrade to beta, then they cant expect bugs, and know that
they will prob soon be fixed
[View Quote]"dion" <Dion at digevo.net> wrote in message
news:3d89aa44$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, that would be rather dumb. Totally ruins the point of a beta.
>
> "equin0x" <xeroer at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3d899ada$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 29, 2002, 12:44pm
I wish i may, i wish i might, tell AW how to do it right.
K, i think AW should have bloody add ons! even a scripting language would be
fine. gee, just something so others can help in the development and do the
things they want! i think that should be far more important then there silly
water feature(which is cool thou :) )
Oct 11, 2002, 10:06pm
emmm, well anyone who gets there ppw can delete the whole world....
[View Quote]"lady vanethica" <lady_vanethica at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3da517eb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That is because it is an item that the Administration handles.
> If it is handed to teh World Owner then anyone who has hacked his acct
could
> go in and take his world offline. It would make their accounts more
> vulnerable to be hacked by people who dislike them or their worlds theme.
>
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3da0be3e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "maki" <maki at awmaki.com> wrote in message
> news:3da0bda8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
not
>
> Definately, I don't know why it would just be a caretaker option.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
>
|
Oct 14, 2002, 1:30pm
hmm, dont know about the rest of you, but id like to be able to choose the
camera height in my avs. that way if we have something like a frog, we can
make the camera at the top of the head, and vice versa.
-SWE
Oct 14, 2002, 4:27pm
well, what if its something that has the eyes in the stomach or lower? like
an upside down person :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3dab03a9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message
news:3daae300 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
can
>
> I believe it puts the camera at the highest point on the Avatar.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Oct 16, 2002, 4:32pm
accually, the bending of l ight is called refraction, reflection is when the
light, is emm, given(?) back.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
news:3dadabe0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> In so many words your nuts....there is NO BODY of WATER on this earth
that you can see as far under water as you can out of... period. and get
off the "bending light" that is called reflection and if it's reflecting
it's reflecting off of something.
>
> "Water just refracts it at a different angle." LOL BB hands Bowen
a fence post.
>
> "Now, if you're, again, talking about natural, earth water... that is
something different from pure HOH." LOL duh
>
> This is what WE are talking about yes Realistic water effects....sheeesh
stop arguing in your own head dude.
>
> The distance you can see(clearity), has to do with the density of the
air/water.
>
> "But I can see nearly as far in water as I can out of water (don't confuse
your eyes with mine). "
>
> *nearly as far* lol ok this makes our point right here
>
> and this has nothing to do with eyes...yours nor mine.
>
> use hardware to do the measuring.....:) it all comes out in the wash.
>
> Leo :)
>
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3dad8eeb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
simply is not
water ....even
light." I
water is part
your
in air as
if you're,
from pure
except it should
confuse your eyes
just a style
>
>
|
Oct 16, 2002, 5:28pm
wait sorry, bowen is right, i have a swimming pool, and goto the beach alot,
the reason you see less in sea water is cus of the amount of dirt in there,
but swimming pools, you can clearly see to the bottom. just everything seems
alot smaller(unless its from an angle, where the sky reflects)
-SWe
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
news:3dadabe0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> In so many words your nuts....there is NO BODY of WATER on this earth
that you can see as far under water as you can out of... period. and get
off the "bending light" that is called reflection and if it's reflecting
it's reflecting off of something.
>
> "Water just refracts it at a different angle." LOL BB hands Bowen
a fence post.
>
> "Now, if you're, again, talking about natural, earth water... that is
something different from pure HOH." LOL duh
>
> This is what WE are talking about yes Realistic water effects....sheeesh
stop arguing in your own head dude.
>
> The distance you can see(clearity), has to do with the density of the
air/water.
>
> "But I can see nearly as far in water as I can out of water (don't confuse
your eyes with mine). "
>
> *nearly as far* lol ok this makes our point right here
>
> and this has nothing to do with eyes...yours nor mine.
>
> use hardware to do the measuring.....:) it all comes out in the wash.
>
> Leo :)
>
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3dad8eeb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
simply is not
water ....even
light." I
water is part
your
in air as
if you're,
from pure
except it should
confuse your eyes
just a style
>
>
|
Oct 25, 2002, 2:48pm
cuz a bot is too much hassle! gee, then why dont you ask whats the point of
sun, just use corans....
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3db9095d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Whats the point of this? Use a bot.
>
> "anduin" <anduin at anduin-lothario.com> wrote in message
> news:r5mhrukskh9rbqoac7jq2omlnd8v3oc6au at 4ax.com...
> scribed the following <3DB8C8AB.A332A118 at charter.net> in beta:
created
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2002, 12:29pm
your taking the piss right?
[View Quote]"d a n" <awdan at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3dbe7263 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Follow-up to wishlist :P
>
> ---
> D a n
>
>
> "john" <johnfricker at lineone.net> wrote in message
> news:3dbe7174$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
John
:-P
a
> thing
just
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2002, 3:14pm
ya, but not as cheap :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3dbecd42$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "d a n" <awdan at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3dbeca30 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> So you want the world explosion to go to the world bomb? What's the
purpose of that?
> Couldn't a bot do that just as easily?
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2002, 5:45pm
how much would the world cost! hosting cost? bot hosting? all that shhh!
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3dbeee8e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> erm.... what in gods name are you on about.. how much does Xelagot cost?
Ziltch.
>
> - Mark
> "swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message
news:3dbecfe8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 30, 2002, 1:08pm
would be a cool effect if you could have a primitive refraction thing, where
everything under water looks closer, oh, and when the world is tring to get
a sunny look, and you go behind a hill or something, it looks really dark,
which isnt how it is in real life.
Oct 31, 2002, 8:55am
ok, instead of havin fake cars and shit, why not just make it possible to
control the avatar speed. so, we could have it as when your in a certain
avatar(say, a human), you go at 10mph and when your in another(say a car av)
you move at 80mph and when your in another (say motorcycle) you go at
100mph. and so on. and with the new 3.4 ability to disable the avatar list,
and choose someones avatar, it will make some fun games possible. hell, we
could have proper racing games maybe,with enough bot work lol :)
Nov 8, 2002, 8:18pm
well, if im not mistaken, whenever someone changes an object, the browser
adds the new one, then deletes the old one anyway, so either way (weather
changed, or just added) it would be a new object.
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3dcc0773$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've said before that I think its time that we have a whole new event for
> object changes ... to reflect the SDK methods that causes it. I've got one
> (but only for specifically monitored objects) in that enhanced SDK thingie
I
> mentioned a few days ago, but (like I believe you think, Mark), I feel its
> been way too long now that we've had to deal with not knowing if the
object
> was "added" to a world because of a change or a new object.
>
> Of course, we may not fully appreciate the impact of such a seemingly
simple
> new feature. It all depends on whether the aw_object_change sends an
actual
> "object change" request or an "object add" and an "object delete". Maybe
> someone who's familiar with the AW messages can help here.
>
> Grims
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3dcc0267 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AW_EVENT_OBJECT_ADD if the object was changed using AW_OBJECT_CHANGE as
the
> number is already sent. This way we could find out what changed, which
would
> be perfect for my World tracker bot for AWNewbie...
>
>
|
Dec 2, 2002, 6:26pm
emm, you mean like a normal SPIRIT!
[View Quote]"saber mage" <brandon-smith at kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3deab308 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Trust me, i didnt get this idea from technozeus! Anyway, i was thinking
the
> other day that it would be nice if there was a way to make a corona's size
> set so that it wouldnt appear to get bigger as you went further away and
get
> smaller as u get closer, kinda like a normal object. I dont really have a
> use for this i just thought it might be interesting ^_^
>
>
|
Dec 3, 2002, 8:30am
emm yes, thats what a normal spirit is, the further away you get, the
smaller it appears, like real objects. :)
[View Quote]"saber mage" <brandon-smith at kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3debff15$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yes swe. i realize they dont truely change size, but i want it so tat u
can
> make em be like normal objects instead of flares
>
> "swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message
> news:3debc1fb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
thinking
> size
and
have
> a
>
>
|
Dec 11, 2002, 10:48pm
ok, about the shrinking, would that not ruin the whole point of having
bloody coranas?
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3deded77$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I also think the Corona command sould have more options, including an
option to make it shrink on your screen as it gets farther away even though
this would look more like a sprite and less like a corona, but I think if we
really want better sprites, a facer command should be added...
>
> For ZOrientY...
> Create Facer Y
> would cause the object to rotate around the Y axis to keep it's Z axis
facing you.
>
> For ZOrientX...
> Create FacerX
> would cause the object to rotate around it's X axis to keep the Z axis
facing you.
>
> For OrientXYZ...
> Create Facer
> would cause the object to always apear to face your screen directly with
it's Z axis.
>
> Alternatively, the object's orientation could be used so that the object
could be pre-rotated, and the rotate command would still have an effect on
it, but your avatar's orientation would also be added to the object's
aparent facing direction... or this could be switchable with one or more
additional parameters.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3ded0f65$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
a
>
>
|
Dec 16, 2002, 7:44pm
yes well, for diffrent effects, use spirits
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3df84e04$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If it's an "option" it wouldn't hurt anything. The default would still be
as it is now. I think there are several things that could be made optional,
to allow the corona command to be used for many different effects rather
than "only" for lense flare and corona effects.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message
news:3df7dcd1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
though
if we
with
object
on
facer
there's
>
>
|
Dec 2, 2002, 6:31pm
im guessing it would cause quiet abit of lag if you want the size to update
without bouncing, not sure thou.
[View Quote]"saber mage" <brandon-smith at kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3deab5bb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I was just thinking the other day that it would be nice that instead of
> having to find just the right size sphere, there could be a command that
> creates an object-like sphere projection according to a size you give it.
> Ex: Create sphere size=5
>
> This would create a sphere that is five clicks in depth width and hight.
> Also being able to apply a texture to the sphere, or defining if it is
> solid: create sphere size=5 texture=warp solid=on
>
> or in place of texture; color. I just thought this would be useful for
> creating a sheild over something, or any other use you can think of. Oh!
and
> being able to define the opacity of the sphere: create sphere size=5
> texture=warp solid=on opacity=("transluscent" or "opaque")
>
>
|
Dec 21, 2002, 8:54pm
is your english really this bad, or are you faking it?
because if you're faking it, it's annoying
[View Quote]"jacob the hero" <jacob2000caca at yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:3e03d7ee$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The Color Are Red orange yellow green blue and purple! They Cool! are you
> going add On Feature, That is my idea! :) try it on!
>
>
|
Dec 26, 2002, 9:25pm
wouldnt it be better if 0 is looking down, and 180 is looking up?
[View Quote]"john" <johnf_the_great at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e09abcc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've just been reading about pitch in 3.4 in the SDK NG (to do with bots),
I
> think we should have:
>
> create pitch 135, which makes you look up, or create pitch 45, which makes
> you look down. This would be a brilliant function as i'm sure a lot of
> people know the problems when running down huge flights of stairs too fast
> with walls in front............ a lil run here, hover, walk on air, land,
> run, hover, walk, land, etc.
>
> Hehe
>
> ~John
>
>
|
Jan 6, 2003, 4:16pm
would be nice if u had alot more control of the user and browser, such as
being able to set the FOV, and being able to set avatar speeds.
Feb 7, 2003, 8:48pm
ha! fat chance of that happening :)
[View Quote]"ryan jacob" <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e3db8d5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I wish we had confirmation that our wishes have been acknowledged...
>
> Ryan Jacob
>
> "jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
> news:3e3da5cd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> move
> the
>
>
|
Apr 28, 2003, 3:32pm
and whos gonna pay for all this? im sure aw arent! look how long it took
them to update the browser, how long do you think it will take to make a
new, better one?
-SWE Wu
[View Quote]"talisan" <wardaor at !hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ea2dfe5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I am proposing that a new project to develope AW2 be explored which would
> require a complete rewrite of the browser from ground zero using the
latest
> in technology and lack of backward compatibility. Requiring the most
recent
> DirectX, CPU(P3 or better processor), video(Geforce2+/Radeon 9000+) and
> OS(Windows XP/2000)
>
> I am proposing that AW2 run along side AW1 and that AW1 not be dropped or
> abandoned until such time as AW people migrate from one system to the
other
> in suffient numbers as to warrant abandoning it
>
> I would also propose that Contact lists be mutual between AW1 and AW2 as
to
> not abandon communication between users in either system.
>
> I would further propose that if this topic is at all debated in this forum
> that a respected reader of these newsgroups be elected as secretary to
keep
> track of the debate and list the proposals and ideas for AW2 in an up to
> date features/requirements list to be reposted and updated twice monthly
or
> as required.
>
> I nominate Technozeus for that position.
>
> Respectfully
> -Talisan
>
>
|
Apr 29, 2003, 1:27pm
aactually, its more then just the processor's serial i believe, its a
mixture between that and the hard drive serial, and some other things. thats
why when you change things in your pc (such as adding ram) it will say
invalid password, because your computer id has changed, and so it doesnt
decrpyt it correctly, since it uses your computer id as the encrption key or
something like that. or wait, is that a diffrent matter?
-sWE Wu
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
news:3ead6c29 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "panther1403" <panther1403 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3ead3e40 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
few
against
on
(Ooops
something
Maybe it
the AW
>
> Only Pentium 3's broadcasted the serial number I thought. Even so, they
wouldn't
> directly use the serial number... they'd hash it.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Apr 28, 2003, 8:06am
emm, every world has a seperate elev dump...
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3EABBFE8.C35F6AEA at oct31.de...
> duh, of course, I didn't think about that
>
>
> tengel wrote:
like
have
|
|
