1  2  3  |   Order by default

Dec 6, 2002, 5:00am

I've gone with "Universe Login" which is sorta similair to your suggestion,
Tony. Don't wanna say settings, because when you are in the settings dialog,
it becomes rather redundant to say settigns in the list. Thanks for the
help. :)

[View Quote]
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.426 / Virus Database: 239 - Release Date: 12/02/2002

Feb 23, 2000, 5:13am

[View Quote]

Feb 23, 2000, 5:35am

And why doesn't my name show up capitalized in the From column? It's capped
in my Outlook Express settings.

Feb 23, 2000, 5:32am

One of the things I've not seen mentioned here (although I haven't read
all 4000+ messages yet) that I'd like to see if the ability to restrict
citizens from my world with something other than eject. I was thinking
something along the lines of putting a - (minus) in front of the citizen's
number in the Enter field of the world rights would forbit there entrance,
but still allow everyone else in.
Obviously this does nothing for keeping out certain tourists (although
you could keep put all tourists with -0, but that wouldn't really be a nice
thing to do.), or citizens that enter your world as a tourist, but it could
help a bit with troublemakers.

Feb 25, 2000, 6:29pm

[View Quote] As long as they could be turned off at will. AW is slow enough as it
is, but if it had to decode an MP3 at the same time, it would probably make
some of the older machines look like this. (Wraps a hand around his throat
and makes gurgling noises.)
However, I've never ran AW and had Winamp (www.winamp.com) play an MP3
at the same time. Maybe I should try it.

May 31, 2000, 1:35pm

"myrth" <myrth_109 at hotmail.com> wrote...
> Doesn't this work?
>
> avatar
> name=______
> geometry=far.rwx
> endavatar

I think I tried that when I owned a trial world and it failed to work. I
don't remember exactly what happened, but I'm pretty certain it failed,
because I ended up using another method.

Jun 27, 2003, 3:58am

Itr has been two versions; new contact list features in 3.3, and 3.4 just
released. Time to start in for 3.5. Heh.


[View Quote]

Jun 27, 2003, 3:37pm

Yes, and the bot be able to force an object or the av list to refresh for
people. This could lead to some cool possibilities for game worlds.


[View Quote]

Aug 14, 2003, 5:11pm

Perhaps what he is seeing is simply the modifier key that must be held along
with the turning keys to sidestep. Shift by default. Try setting keys for
"Move Left" and "Move Right", right under the keys for turning. They will
let you sidestep in that direction with a single key. My preference is the
NumPad1 and NumPad3.

[View Quote]

Aug 15, 2003, 3:10pm

Yeah, but I never got used to those other keys on the NumPad, besides the
arrows, in AW. I've been itching for years to match my AW keybindings to
those I developed a love for in games.

[View Quote]

Aug 15, 2003, 3:07pm

Envirosphere. (Grins secretively and mischeviously before going back to
programming.)

[View Quote]

Aug 16, 2003, 4:28am

Sure, why not? (Laughs.)

Actually, I had no idea of the anime thing. I just came up with the name out
of my own twisted mind. (Starts contemplating a rename.)

[View Quote]

Aug 17, 2003, 6:09pm

Would you please enlighten me how an SDK program can be an AW knock-off?

[View Quote]

Jul 11, 2001, 4:09pm

IS there an URL to something that tells you about the new features and keeps
you updated on the progress of 3.2, like I remember there being for 3.0? Or
do you have to attend the Tech Talks you get the poop?


"moff piett" <piett at home.com> wrote
unfortunatly those sorts of backdrops will be out-dated when 3.2 comes
out... oh well.

Aug 28, 2001, 1:41am

Try www.000domains.com. $13.50/year, good support, full control of your
account, ICANN accredited, and can purchase from 1 year to 10. I've heard
complaints about almost any registrar out there, but this one. Well, there
was one guy, but he wanted technical support to answer him in 10 minutes by
email. It can and does happen, but expecting it every time is just asking
too much.

[View Quote]

Sep 30, 2001, 10:06pm

Don't you mean a 3D Homepage? (Grins.)



[View Quote] [View Quote]

Sep 30, 2001, 10:27pm

Anyone else notice that the release of 3.2 still says beta on the splash
screen? Although 3.2 seems to have lots of bugs (according to others; I've
had no problems as yet) like a beta, but since it's been release I presume
it's not a beta any longer, right?

I never liked the 3.x series splash screens anyway, so I found a nice 3D
rendered nature scene and now use it instead.

--
Percipient

Jun 17, 2002, 2:20pm

Actually, all they'd need to do is replace their encrypted password in their
aw.ini file with the encrytped one they stole, and let the AW browser
decrypt it for them.

--
Percipient

"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote...
first of all, it'd take one heck of a programmer to figure that out. And
even if they did, they'd only have your password that is encoded with sa
bunch of crap. You'd have to know how to decrypt it as well, which includes
lots of other computer information.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 6/5/02

Nov 26, 2003, 9:21pm

"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote...
<snip>
| Now, the faux pas of not being able to compare any two chips produced by
| different companies is a non-sequitor. You can only use that if you're
| comparing two seperate types of processors, ie Alpha and x86,
| Apple(Motorola) and x86, so on. As for comparing like processors, it's
| actually very good. (especially in the FSB)
<snip>


Modern Apple processors are made by IBM, no longer Motorola. IBM, as many of
you probably know, is the parent company of AMD. That's why both AMD and
Apple chips brag about similar stuff, like shorter pipelines, 32-bit being
native instead of emulated on the new 64-bit chips, and not looking at just
the megahertz rating.

But, I digress slightly from the topic at hand...

Mar 29, 2000, 11:56am

Makes ya wonder what's the point.

[View Quote]

Jun 7, 2000, 11:40am

Just as long as we can avoid the mentality where you getting the highest
points when giving what-for to Granny and her walker (i.e. Carmagedon).

Jun 5, 2000, 11:27am

[View Quote] Wherever you have a group of people someone will piss 'n' moan about
something. It's inevitable.

Jun 1, 2000, 4:33pm

A friend of mine had this same problem a short time ago. She was not
running 3.0b. Just on a hunch, I suggested she drag the chat scrollbar all
the way to the bottom--like it is suposed to work in the beta. She says
that it worked right after that--or at least for the rest of that night.
I don't know if this will do you any good, but if it worked for one
person, it might work for another.
I hope your day goes well,
Percipient

Feb 18, 2001, 6:41pm

IQ tests don't do much to test common sense and maturity.

[View Quote]

Feb 18, 2001, 6:43pm

I would think someone who got 175 on the standard IQ test would be bright
enough to know it's AN IQ test, not "a iq" test. Or maybe IQ tests don't
cover that?


[View Quote]

Feb 18, 2001, 6:49pm

Knowledge is useless without wisdom. The only test I know of for wisdom is
life.

Feb 18, 2001, 9:05pm

I have an Active Worlds -- and related universes -- project I'm working
on, but I'm stumped on one part of the name. What would you call all of the
universes, based on the Active Worlds software, as a whole. I mean, it
sounds pretty lame and uncreative to just call them "the Universes." It
needs something with more kick. Your suggestions would be appreciated.
Sorry, I'm not ready to let anyone know just what the project is, at
this point. It's still just in the planning stages. I'm sure most of you
wouldn't do this, but if I gave away my idea too early, someone might grab
it, put up a cheap rendition of my idea, and then lessen the appreciation of
my work.
Anyway, thanks in advance for your ideas and info.
Percipient

Feb 19, 2001, 9:59pm

The general concensus seems to be toward omniverse, so omniverse it
shall be. Thanks for the input -- especially you, eep. Now just gimme a
few weeks, and I'll let you know what this omniverse stuff'll be all about.
Percipient

Feb 19, 2001, 5:48pm

Hurray! He has seen the light. Another stubborn mind is humbled... sorta.

"outlaw x" <tbooker at frontiernet.net> wrote...
> Yes andras , I suppose your right , ok Guys you win , I'll stop , but if
ya
> really want to save bandwith ,(which is not a big concern of mine , guess
> its just my wasteful American attitude: ) ) everyone try to delete the
> Reference message , or open a new message and paste the subject in , just
a
> suggestion . and when I get up to a Meg let me know , and I'll cut you a
> check for 20¢ , or whatever that is in Eurodollars, my Europeian friend
{8^D

Feb 24, 2001, 10:37pm

"A soft answer turns away wrath." Hmmm, but then there'd be a lot less
activity in here, wouldn't there?

1  2  3  |   Order by default