|
3.2 Splash Screen (General Discussion)
3.2 Splash Screen // General Discussion
Sep 30, 2001, 10:27pm
Anyone else notice that the release of 3.2 still says beta on the splash
screen? Although 3.2 seems to have lots of bugs (according to others; I've
had no problems as yet) like a beta, but since it's been release I presume
it's not a beta any longer, right?
I never liked the 3.x series splash screens anyway, so I found a nice 3D
rendered nature scene and now use it instead.
--
Percipient
Oct 1, 2001, 1:49am
Mine doesn't say beta...
--
- Syntax -
www.swcity.net (newly renovated)
[View Quote]percipient <percipient at percipients.com> wrote in message
news:3bb7b88f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Anyone else notice that the release of 3.2 still says beta on the splash
> screen? Although 3.2 seems to have lots of bugs (according to others; I've
> had no problems as yet) like a beta, but since it's been release I presume
> it's not a beta any longer, right?
>
> I never liked the 3.x series splash screens anyway, so I found a nice 3D
> rendered nature scene and now use it instead.
>
> --
> Percipient
>
>
|
Oct 1, 2001, 9:09am
mine nether
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3bb7e7c0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Mine doesn't say beta...
> --
> - Syntax -
> www.swcity.net (newly renovated)
>
> percipient <percipient at percipients.com> wrote in message
> news:3bb7b88f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I've
presume
>
>
|
Oct 1, 2001, 9:33am
hmmm... perhaps you used the auto-update tool right after 3.2 being
released? I downloaded the installer, didn't get beta on that one...
KAH
[View Quote]"percipient" <percipient at percipients.com> wrote in message
news:3bb7b88f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Anyone else notice that the release of 3.2 still says beta on the splash
> screen? Although 3.2 seems to have lots of bugs (according to others; I've
> had no problems as yet) like a beta, but since it's been release I presume
> it's not a beta any longer, right?
>
> I never liked the 3.x series splash screens anyway, so I found a nice 3D
> rendered nature scene and now use it instead.
>
> --
> Percipient
>
>
|
Oct 1, 2001, 10:18am
Well i dont know if this has any bearing but i downloaded 3.2 as an update
on both my computers and the one that upgraded from 2.2 says "beta" now and
the one that upgraded 3.1 dosent.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3bb8549e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
hmmm... perhaps you used the auto-update tool right after 3.2 being
released? I downloaded the installer, didn't get beta on that one...
|
KAH
[View Quote]"percipient" <percipient at percipients.com> wrote in message
news:3bb7b88f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Anyone else notice that the release of 3.2 still says beta on the splash
> screen? Although 3.2 seems to have lots of bugs (according to others; I've
> had no problems as yet) like a beta, but since it's been release I presume
> it's not a beta any longer, right?
>
> I never liked the 3.x series splash screens anyway, so I found a nice 3D
> rendered nature scene and now use it instead.
>
> --
> Percipient
>
>
|
Oct 2, 2001, 3:36pm
I downloaded the installer too, but it says beta.....
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3bb8549e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hmmm... perhaps you used the auto-update tool right after 3.2 being
> released? I downloaded the installer, didn't get beta on that one...
>
> KAH
>
> "percipient" <percipient at percipients.com> wrote in message
> news:3bb7b88f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I've
presume
>
>
|
Oct 11, 2001, 4:46am
mine dosent have that either
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3bb8549e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hmmm... perhaps you used the auto-update tool right after 3.2 being
> released? I downloaded the installer, didn't get beta on that one...
>
> KAH
>
> "percipient" <percipient at percipients.com> wrote in message
> news:3bb7b88f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I've
presume
>
>
|
|