|
Newsgroups (Community)
Newsgroups // Community
Nov 7, 2002, 1:20pm
ENZO wants to make sure that WE are not making AW history whether we think
so or not.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
news:3dc9d66e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> BB thinks Rick needs to take his time and think this out....remember, you
> could be making VR history with moves like this....:) Take your time and
> consult some "higher-ups" <looks upward>
>
> AW is making VR history whether we think so or not....:)
>
>
> "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage(dot)com> wrote in message
> news:3dc9d4d6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 1:57pm
I'm not ignoring it whatsoever; I'm fully aware that a byproduct of
winning a CY Award is that you might get a few more visitors than you
normally would. But that still doesn't invalidate my argument. Why
should that prevent worthy contenders from winning an award? If an
adult-oriented world truly had the best objects or avatars (even if some
of them aren't entirely "proper") or what-have-you, why should they be
denied the recognition just because some curious 12-yr-old might visit
their world afterwards? Should the Academy not recognize well done
R-rated movies simply because some kid might rent that movie after
seeing it win an Oscar? I think not. Once again, it's up to the parents
to make sure their kids don't go where they're not supposed to, not the
CY Committee.
[View Quote]daphne wrote:
> Goober King... What the Cy Committee did have control of is the rules they
> follow and, since they are this community's award program, then what rules
> they put in place need to be in keeping with this community's wishes and
> that has always been, for the majority, the wish to keep this software
> family oriented...
>
> The family oriented standing is why many came here in the first place and
> why many have stayed... It's one of the main reasons why I had always
> promoted ActiveWorlds to practically everyone I talked to!!!
>
> We lost users in January and since because of the large price increase...
> Most of us that are still here understood the necessity of that even though
> it didn't exactly make us happy... We stayed because we still have great
> hopes for this software and because it was still mostly in keeping with what
> we could still support... We knew some Adult-rated worlds existed in this
> universe but, for the most part, they kept to themselves and didn't 'always'
> shove their existance in our faces...
>
> What has changed is that now the Community's premiere awards event HAS
> "shoved" their existance in our faces and held them up for the whole online
> community to view as some of the best that ActiveWorlds has to offer...
>
> Many of us do NOT want our Community known for it's Adult-themed worlds
> whether they are very well done or not!!! THIS is why the controversy!!!
> It's not because we are actually afraid that the community's Cy Awards
> event will have nekkid avatars parading on the stage... It's because
> allowing this to continue will eventually change the whole face of
> ActiveWorlds!!!
>
> The picks done through the Cy Awards do more than reward for best this or
> best that... They also influence... That's something you seem to be
> ignoring in your protests...
>
>
> Goober king <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3DCA5759.9040008 at utn.cjb.net...
>
> want
>
> worlds
>
|
--
Goober King
Turning a blind eye doesn't make the problem go away.
robrod at prism.net
Nov 7, 2002, 2:06pm
I said R rated movies, not X, as, if I'm not mistaken, minors are not
supposed to be watching R rated movies anymore than they should be
watching X rated ones. And, if I recall correctly, there have been
plenty of R rated movies that have won some sort of Oscar. (maybe not
Best Picture, but an Oscar is an Oscar)
At any rate, thank you for clearing that up. I was afraid AWI would
start trying to legislate the community into oblivion. :P
[View Quote]e n z o wrote:
> The Cy awards are not and have never been an AW Inc. sponsored event. They
> have always been taken care of by the community members who sacrifice their
> time and effort to make them happen.
>
> AW Inc. makes software. You make worlds. Those worlds have content. If
> the content falls into one rating or another then there needs to be a rating
> which allows veiwers to chose if they wish to visit. This feature will be
> built into the software. How you use it will be your responsibility. World
> owners will have to be responsible as will veiwers who set their personal
> rating limits.
>
> Your invocation of the Oscars is not logical.
>
> Rarely (and I say rarely because I am almost positive but could be wrong)
> does a X rated movie win an Oscars. There are other award shows that do
> present films of that rating with awards, but not the Oscars. Also, the
> Oscars as do the Cy awards often become places for advertising worlds and
> philosophies.
>
> This is not meant as a discussion point. "Policing" will be done by you the
> world owner and you the veiwer - not AW.
>
> ENZO
>
>
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3DC9DB14.4000002 at utn.cjb.net...
>
|
--
Goober King
Just what we need in AW... virtual politics!
robrod at prism.net
Nov 7, 2002, 2:11pm
Should I have repeated my feelings about the community awards event
promoting Adult ONLY content/conduct and inhumane practices, whether
consentual or not, so you could fully understand why I feel the way I do???
Like you said in your signature... Turning a blind eye doesn't make the
problem go away...
[View Quote]goober king <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3DCA948B.5010709 at utn.cjb.net...
> I'm not ignoring it whatsoever; I'm fully aware that a byproduct of
> winning a CY Award is that you might get a few more visitors than you
> normally would. But that still doesn't invalidate my argument. Why
> should that prevent worthy contenders from winning an award? If an
> adult-oriented world truly had the best objects or avatars (even if some
> of them aren't entirely "proper") or what-have-you, why should they be
> denied the recognition just because some curious 12-yr-old might visit
> their world afterwards? Should the Academy not recognize well done
> R-rated movies simply because some kid might rent that movie after
> seeing it win an Oscar? I think not. Once again, it's up to the parents
> to make sure their kids don't go where they're not supposed to, not the
> CY Committee.
>
> daphne wrote:
they
rules
and
increase...
though
great
what
this
'always'
online
controversy!!!
or
|
Nov 7, 2002, 3:32pm
Yes, I can see where your comming from, but things only advance and evolve by making history. All depends on how its done.
- Mark
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3dca92e8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ENZO wants to make sure that WE are not making AW history whether we think
> so or not.
|
Nov 7, 2002, 4:21pm
good point...:) AW should make the history not AWI :) Gotcha...:)
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3dca92e8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ENZO wants to make sure that WE are not making AW history whether we think
> so or not.
>
>
>
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3dc9d66e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 5:52pm
I meant it in the same vein as the anti-cigarette ads.... "Make smoking
history"
E
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
news:3dcabd47$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> good point...:) AW should make the history not AWI :)
Gotcha...:)
>
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3dca92e8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
think
you
and
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 7:43pm
LOL oh my I See....... yea even better point!
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3dcad278$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I meant it in the same vein as the anti-cigarette ads.... "Make smoking
> history"
>
> E
>
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3dcabd47$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Gotcha...:)
> news:3dca92e8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> think
> you
> and
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 9:30pm
Exactly! Well put Daphne.
[View Quote]"daphne" <Daphne at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3dca7dbe$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Goober King... What the Cy Committee did have control of is the rules
they
> follow and, since they are this community's award program, then what rules
> they put in place need to be in keeping with this community's wishes and
> that has always been, for the majority, the wish to keep this software
> family oriented...
>
> The family oriented standing is why many came here in the first place and
> why many have stayed... It's one of the main reasons why I had always
> promoted ActiveWorlds to practically everyone I talked to!!!
>
> We lost users in January and since because of the large price increase...
> Most of us that are still here understood the necessity of that even
though
> it didn't exactly make us happy... We stayed because we still have great
> hopes for this software and because it was still mostly in keeping with
what
> we could still support... We knew some Adult-rated worlds existed in this
> universe but, for the most part, they kept to themselves and didn't
'always'
> shove their existance in our faces...
>
> What has changed is that now the Community's premiere awards event HAS
> "shoved" their existance in our faces and held them up for the whole
online
> community to view as some of the best that ActiveWorlds has to offer...
>
> Many of us do NOT want our Community known for it's Adult-themed worlds
> whether they are very well done or not!!! THIS is why the controversy!!!
> It's not because we are actually afraid that the community's Cy Awards
> event will have nekkid avatars parading on the stage... It's because
> allowing this to continue will eventually change the whole face of
> ActiveWorlds!!!
>
> The picks done through the Cy Awards do more than reward for best this or
> best that... They also influence... That's something you seem to be
> ignoring in your protests...
>
>
> Goober king <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3DCA5759.9040008 at utn.cjb.net...
an
to
> want
> worlds
award.
a
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 9:38pm
What Daphne is saying is that they shouldn't promote that kind of adult
content. After the CY Awards, I visited the adult world that won the award
and found some very inappropriate pictures of a woman sitting on a guys lap,
naked and having sex. This shouldnt be displayed as some of AW's "best". Do
you ever watch the news reports about the types of websites that are online
now? You don't see them promoting that. I believe the news described those
types of pictures as "filth." Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the
world was filth....but some of their content is. The CY Awards are a
"Community" thing. People of all ages make up the community, including
children. If we promote that kind of content, then it will bring more of a
negative impression to people about ActiveWorlds.
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3DCA948B.5010709 at utn.cjb.net...
> I'm not ignoring it whatsoever; I'm fully aware that a byproduct of
> winning a CY Award is that you might get a few more visitors than you
> normally would. But that still doesn't invalidate my argument. Why
> should that prevent worthy contenders from winning an award? If an
> adult-oriented world truly had the best objects or avatars (even if some
> of them aren't entirely "proper") or what-have-you, why should they be
> denied the recognition just because some curious 12-yr-old might visit
> their world afterwards? Should the Academy not recognize well done
> R-rated movies simply because some kid might rent that movie after
> seeing it win an Oscar? I think not. Once again, it's up to the parents
> to make sure their kids don't go where they're not supposed to, not the
> CY Committee.
>
> daphne wrote:
they
rules
and
increase...
though
great
what
this
'always'
online
controversy!!!
or
a
>
> --
> Goober King
> Turning a blind eye doesn't make the problem go away.
> robrod at prism.net
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 10:34pm
Some people... :)
I think this accentuates the point that we do need some active moderators in
here. They're the key to a happy newsgroup. The mood has lightened
considerably (for the most part) since all these posts have been deleted.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3dca928c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> :)
>
> I for one self censor my reading... I know who I would read messages from
> and what topics are of interest. Until the recent rash of
> calls/telegrams/email to the office I thought everyone in here did as
well.
>
> With 22K of messages, I was asking for a place to start looking for posts
I
> probably had filtered.
>
> ENZO
>
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
> news:3dc9d33a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
but
> If
to
wrong
> wrong
> things
other
> think
members
> of
names
> to
with
> a
between
> office
> the
> that
group
> I
> marring
> delete
> post
> be
> can
> your
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 10:41pm
Ok ok ok....we will have to put our thinking caps on:)
Thanks for clarifying that E N Z O:)
Nov 7, 2002, 10:48pm
I think besides a Christmas Bingo there should be other religous beliefs
Bingo:)
Nov 7, 2002, 10:53pm
Even I will have to speak out against this. As the AWTeen Community
Relations Officer, it is not right to ban an AWI sponsored world from a huge
event such as this.
J
[View Quote]"kerstin" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
news:3dca5874$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 2. Cys decide to hold a separate Teen Award event each year, so that those
> talented kids can get the recognition they deserve, in a safe environment.
>
> 3. Some generous and caring community members support this astute move by
> the Cys by jumping in to offer prizes for the event!
>
> 3. The teens go wild!! They are so happy that they will have their own
> event, in which they now can shine even brighter, and even have a better
> chance of winning, without having to compete against adults with more
> experience, some of whom are professional! And they can win worlds! cits!
> software! yay!
>
> 4. The entire community is happy that something that was perceived as a
> negative by a few people, was turned into a wonderful positive by a few
> other people who decided that instead of harping and complaining, they'd
> support this positive action by AWinc, and find a way to make it work for
> more people in the CommunitY, so that even more people could be satisifed.
>
> 5. The previous fragmentation in the CommunitY begins to heal, they renew
> their cits and worlds, and everybody lives happily ever after.
>
>
>
> "antigone" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:3dc9dba9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 10:55pm
Oh...and since I have seen adult type chat in citbingo, I would like to
request there be a world rating on citbingo...that or under 18 bingo and
over 18 bingo please:)
Nov 7, 2002, 10:56pm
There isn't a solution, or at least not an easy one. Having it on two nights
would alienate a large part of the community from the main awards. Either
way, one part of the community will be alienated, from how it seems. Either
it will be the teens, or the adult worlds. Which will the Cy's choose?
J
[View Quote]"lady gabrielle" <tesslacap at cox.net> wrote in message
news:3dca8e7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ok.. so why not have the Cy Awards on 2 nites... on the first nite..
incluse
> all the catagories that dont have adult nominees in them... on second nite
> have all... and rate the world that nite...
>
> There REALLY is no solution to this... I have read everyones comments...
but
> the fact still remains... AW is a universe that EVERYONE pays money to be
in
> and EVERYONE has the SAME rights... so what do you do?
>
> Move on EVERYONE... this is REALLY GETTING OLD!!!!!!
>
> Perhaps Daphne's Christmas Bingo topic... come one... let this die folks..
> nothing is being resolved...
> just alot of hurt feelings.... let AW decide.. and live with what they
> decide...
>
> LG
> "daphne" <Daphne at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3dca7503$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it's
> guidelines
> the
Only
> Awards
> beyond
> not
stage
> is
participation
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 10:58pm
With all due respect. I think now you are just trying to pick out events to
direct attention to them instead of on CY. Citbingo doesn't really promote
anything.....its a game world. CY is a little different. ;o)
[View Quote]"antigone" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb0b8b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oh...and since I have seen adult type chat in citbingo, I would like to
> request there be a world rating on citbingo...that or under 18 bingo and
> over 18 bingo please:)
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:02pm
BINGO!
SW Chris
[View Quote]"elyk" <KFoerst at telocity.com> wrote in message
news:3dcaf95e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What Daphne is saying is that they shouldn't promote that kind of adult
> content. After the CY Awards, I visited the adult world that won the award
> and found some very inappropriate pictures of a woman sitting on a guys
lap,
> naked and having sex. This shouldnt be displayed as some of AW's "best".
Do
> you ever watch the news reports about the types of websites that are
online
> now? You don't see them promoting that. I believe the news described those
> types of pictures as "filth." Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the
> world was filth....but some of their content is. The CY Awards are a
> "Community" thing. People of all ages make up the community, including
> children. If we promote that kind of content, then it will bring more of a
> negative impression to people about ActiveWorlds.
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3DCA948B.5010709 at utn.cjb.net...
> they
> rules
and
> and
> increase...
> though
> great
with
> what
> this
> 'always'
> online
offer...
worlds
> controversy!!!
Awards
> or
CYs
the
fault
world.
an
to
award.
is
> a
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:07pm
Wrong Elyk...as long as adult content chat happens in any world where under
18 years old might visit, then same rules would apply.
And not trying to redirect people...just trying to bring to the surface
where other places are going to be effected so they can possibly prepare.
Nov 7, 2002, 11:09pm
That's going to be a VERY hard decision for them to make jstone:(
Not only would teens be banned from attending but could not act anymore as
volunteers on the team nor hold the awteen preshow party.
I will be acting as advisor with TZ and CW and Weebs, so lets cross our
fingers I can help them to make everyone happy:)
Nov 7, 2002, 11:15pm
With all due respect to you Elyk, but it appears that you are attempting to
cause deliberate trouble with some of your recent posts.
> What Daphne is saying is that they shouldn't promote that kind of adult
> content. After the CY Awards, I visited the adult world that won the award
> and found some very inappropriate pictures of a woman sitting on a guys
lap,
> naked and having sex.
Where the heck was this? You won't find this in GZ on any world I've ever
visited. But if you did, you went into an X rated world. Certainly wasn't
GorVernA. I'd appreciate knowing which world so I can see this for myself.
> This shouldnt be displayed as some of AW's "best".
Why not? Why should a world, because it has a nude picture in it, be
discluded from receiving an award if it deserves to for the merits of the
award and by popular vote? 2 worlds you object to did win awards, they did
so because people voted for them and had more votes than other nominee's.
That's the point behind a vote. Are you now going to have an Elyk Award show
where you forego voting and give out awards to what you think should win
them? All worlds in the AW universe ARE part of the community. Therefore all
worlds in the AW Universe should be allowed to win a CY award by popular
vote.
> Do
> you ever watch the news reports about the types of websites that are
online
> now? You don't see them promoting that. I believe the news described those
> types of pictures as "filth." Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the
> world was filth....but some of their content is. The CY Awards are a
> "Community" thing. People of all ages make up the community, including
> children. If we promote that kind of content, then it will bring more of a
> negative impression to people about ActiveWorlds.
Yes, the community is a range of all ages. But, it has been suggested too
many times recently that we should disclude adults worlds... well, how would
you appreciate it if instead of discluding adults, we instead disclude
anyone under the age of 18? Turn the boat around and make it so only worlds
owned and operated by 18 years of age or greater and only visitable by 18 or
older were the only people considered allowed to win a CY award. I can think
of many people here in this group who would very much argue against that and
passionately so.
So far I can count 5 people in this newsgroup who have gone over the top in
arguing that adult worlds should be discluded. They have done so very
passionately, not always thinking out their ideas, making assumptions,
trying to force their view of the world. I am not trying to force you to go
to any adult worlds, nor am I attempting to change your view of adult
worlds, but I am attempting to convince the people in this newsgroup that
discluding a significant portion of the community from the CY's is wrong,
morally, and ethically.
--Talisan
Nov 7, 2002, 11:17pm
You're quite right. Some people wouldn't be happy until adult worlds were
totally removed. But the thing is they are part of the community, like it
or not. Most people will be content with it, though, and in most cases the
majority should determine policy.
Chris
[View Quote]"antigone" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
news:3dca7db4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well...then basically the adult world Cys would move away from the Cys
> entirely as I see it?
>
> From posts in the past people seemed upset that there are even adult
worlds
> in the aw universe.
> Would the next outcry be for aw to remove adult themed worlds from the aw
> universe?
>
> I don't think removing adult themed worlds from the Cys would settle the
> main concerns for some folks in the community.
>
> I don't think some folks would be truly happy until adult themed worlds
were
> completely removed from our universe.
>
> But that's just my observation from all the past history regarding them:)
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:22pm
Yes, kerstin has already decided that that idea will probably not work.
Although I'd be in favor of allowing teens to participate in both
ceremonies. But would that cheapen the value of a CY if teens were elegible
for both a TeenCy and a Cy?
Chris
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <J at Jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb0aed$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Even I will have to speak out against this. As the AWTeen Community
> Relations Officer, it is not right to ban an AWI sponsored world from a
huge
> event such as this.
>
> J
>
> "kerstin" <kersting at blast.net> wrote in message
> news:3dca5874$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
those
environment.
by
cits!
for
satisifed.
renew
award.
a
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:23pm
I certainly hope so...
J
[View Quote]"antigone" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb0ec3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That's going to be a VERY hard decision for them to make jstone:(
> Not only would teens be banned from attending but could not act anymore as
> volunteers on the team nor hold the awteen preshow party.
> I will be acting as advisor with TZ and CW and Weebs, so lets cross our
> fingers I can help them to make everyone happy:)
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:26pm
I've never seen adult chat in citbingo or andor, but in the AWbingo worlds,
and on more than one occasion. In fact I have one chat log from a night
where a ton of Goreans were in there, talking about kinky sex, and
continuing it after being asked to stop because there were underage kids
there. Also, in the chat log, you can see how the host, who is also Gorean,
allows the chat to go on for quite a while, despite the complaints, until
she finally half heartedly asks them to tone it down.
If those sort of conversations are going to be permitted to go on in AWbingo
in open chat, then the world should get some sort of adult rating, and keep
the kids out.
Kerstin
[View Quote]"antigone" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb0b8b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oh...and since I have seen adult type chat in citbingo, I would like to
> request there be a world rating on citbingo...that or under 18 bingo and
> over 18 bingo please:)
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:27pm
I wouldn't call it alienation. More like a positive opportunity for
competition between one's peers.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <J at Jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb0bc5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There isn't a solution, or at least not an easy one. Having it on two
nights
> would alienate a large part of the community from the main awards. Either
> way, one part of the community will be alienated, from how it seems.
Either
> it will be the teens, or the adult worlds. Which will the Cy's choose?
>
> J
>
> "lady gabrielle" <tesslacap at cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3dca8e7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> incluse
nite
> but
be
> in
folks..
before
what
> Only
do
> stage
> participation
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:38pm
You uh, have to admit that public society does frown on x-rated material.
You also have to admit that you can't change public opinion. You can only
work with or around it. If you follow that idea through to its conclusion,
you will see that promoting that kind of material at a public ceremony can
only reflect negatively on the Active Worlds software as a whole.
However you can stem that problem by having another awards ceremony for
adult worlds, giving those adult worlds a good opportunity to recognize
those of their peers. This is not an ideal situation for ANY party. I will
concede you that. But you must admit that it is a compromise that meets
both interests half-way, and therefore one of the best proposals for solving
this CY question.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"talisan" <wardaor at !hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3dcb1048$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> With all due respect to you Elyk, but it appears that you are attempting
to
> cause deliberate trouble with some of your recent posts.
>
award
> lap,
>
> Where the heck was this? You won't find this in GZ on any world I've ever
> visited. But if you did, you went into an X rated world. Certainly wasn't
> GorVernA. I'd appreciate knowing which world so I can see this for myself.
>
>
> Why not? Why should a world, because it has a nude picture in it, be
> discluded from receiving an award if it deserves to for the merits of the
> award and by popular vote? 2 worlds you object to did win awards, they did
> so because people voted for them and had more votes than other nominee's.
> That's the point behind a vote. Are you now going to have an Elyk Award
show
> where you forego voting and give out awards to what you think should win
> them? All worlds in the AW universe ARE part of the community. Therefore
all
> worlds in the AW Universe should be allowed to win a CY award by popular
> vote.
>
> online
those
the
a
>
> Yes, the community is a range of all ages. But, it has been suggested too
> many times recently that we should disclude adults worlds... well, how
would
> you appreciate it if instead of discluding adults, we instead disclude
> anyone under the age of 18? Turn the boat around and make it so only
worlds
> owned and operated by 18 years of age or greater and only visitable by 18
or
> older were the only people considered allowed to win a CY award. I can
think
> of many people here in this group who would very much argue against that
and
> passionately so.
>
> So far I can count 5 people in this newsgroup who have gone over the top
in
> arguing that adult worlds should be discluded. They have done so very
> passionately, not always thinking out their ideas, making assumptions,
> trying to force their view of the world. I am not trying to force you to
go
> to any adult worlds, nor am I attempting to change your view of adult
> worlds, but I am attempting to convince the people in this newsgroup that
> discluding a significant portion of the community from the CY's is wrong,
> morally, and ethically.
>
> --Talisan
>
>
>
>
|
Nov 7, 2002, 11:38pm
She was being sarcastic I think.
Chris
[View Quote]"elyk" <KFoerst at telocity.com> wrote in message
news:3dcb0c51 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> With all due respect. I think now you are just trying to pick out events
to
> direct attention to them instead of on CY. Citbingo doesn't really
promote
> anything.....its a game world. CY is a little different. ;o)
> "antigone" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:3dcb0b8b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 8, 2002, 12:13am
On a personal note I would rather see teen as part of the community awards
together with all other non adult themed worlds. If teen worlds, and yes
there are some in aw are banned from a awards they have actively attended
and took part in since its conception to make way for adult worlds is a sad
reflection on the community. But has Enzo has stated you have one or the
other.
Not wishing to inflame anything or promote flamming or anything else.
If the teens are ousted from this event in favour of "Adult worlds" the
effect is all promotion must also by termed adult promotion and therefore
not allowed to be publically displyed in aw.
But what ever the outcome all aspects have to be considered and the effect
on the community and all its worlds.
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <J at Jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb0bc5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There isn't a solution, or at least not an easy one. Having it on two
nights
> would alienate a large part of the community from the main awards. Either
> way, one part of the community will be alienated, from how it seems.
Either
> it will be the teens, or the adult worlds. Which will the Cy's choose?
>
> J
>
> "lady gabrielle" <tesslacap at cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3dca8e7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> incluse
nite
> but
be
> in
folks..
before
what
> Only
do
> stage
> participation
>
>
|
Nov 8, 2002, 12:34am
but Alienation it is, because teens would once again be hindered from
competing on the level which they deserve.
J
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
news:3dcb12f2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I wouldn't call it alienation. More like a positive opportunity for
> competition between one's peers.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "jstone2004" <J at Jlife.net> wrote in message
> news:3dcb0bc5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> nights
Either
> Either
> nite
comments...
> be
> folks..
they
then
them...
> before
> what
Adult
> do
participate:(
>
>
|
|