|
Value of a cit (Community)
Value of a cit // Community
Sep 1, 2001, 12:41am
Then why are you still here?
[View Quote]
> Yes, and I don't care to continue using active worlds either.
>
> http://members.aol.com/chessmusic/gcn/gcnmusic.htm
>
[View Quote]> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8fec7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> a
>
> the
>
> THEY
>
> saying
>
> have
>
> they
>
> their
>
> end
>
> was
>
> counting
>
> $80,
>
> had.
>
> punished
>
> stand
>
> Junodome.
>
> account
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Proof that Goobers ARE as dumb as they look.
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Sep 1, 2001, 12:47am
LOL figure it out... he has been proven wrong again and he cant let it
appear as if he is beaten, so he will continue to argue that black is white
until we all just give up and let him suffer his delusions in peace...... i
say lets do it NOW before we all need the valium
Flagg said it best <This will be my last post on this issue > lets
follow suit
[View Quote]"builderz" <sawran at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B904419.3DA37C4C at yahoo.com...
> M a r c u s,
>
> What part of "This will be my last post on this issue as I feel I have
> already answered your concerns both in this thread and in a previous
> thread on April 17th." don't you understand?
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://aw.stuff-x.com/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
gift
ability
if
because
matter
to
YOU
in
Worlds
credit my
like a
orginal
look
end
|
Sep 1, 2001, 2:33am
I will reply, and since there was a lot of inaccurate statements, I wanted
to clarify them.
Flagg is not making an accurate run down of the situation at hand. I don't
think it is deliberate, and I don't care if it is, but I do want the truth
to be out so I responded with the areas I felt needed clarification and
correction.
[View Quote]"builderz" <sawran at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B904419.3DA37C4C at yahoo.com...
> M a r c u s,
>
> What part of "This will be my last post on this issue as I feel I have
> already answered your concerns both in this thread and in a previous
> thread on April 17th." don't you understand?
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://aw.stuff-x.com/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
gift
ability
if
because
matter
to
YOU
in
Worlds
credit my
like a
orginal
look
end
|
Sep 1, 2001, 2:35am
Nothing to prove, this is decision, does Active Worlds want to make money?
then they have to make a service as well as a product that SELLS!!!
Charging 20 for a citizen and then giving one for free with a purchase of a
world doesn't sell. I could have had a world with citizen.
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b904c26 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL figure it out... he has been proven wrong again and he cant let it
> appear as if he is beaten, so he will continue to argue that black is
white
> until we all just give up and let him suffer his delusions in peace......
i
> say lets do it NOW before we all need the valium
>
> Flagg said it best <This will be my last post on this issue > lets
> follow suit
>
>
> "builderz" <sawran at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B904419.3DA37C4C at yahoo.com...
> gift
Flagg
> ability
> if
> because
figured
> matter
own
going
> to
> YOU
START
> in
> Worlds
> credit my
> like a
Active
> orginal
> look
> end
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 2:42am
My citizenship hasn't run out, and Active Worlds hasn't refunded me
anything. So this is how I plan on spending my "dying days" on Active
Worlds.
I want you guys to know what has happened. The more people you sucker in
the more money Active Worlds gets to develop the program, so I can
understand why you are not going to take the position I am.
I have nothing to lose, I bought no world. I can tell the truth and state
ways the service could be run more fairly.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B90490D.7040601 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Then why are you still here?
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
know
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> Proof that Goobers ARE as dumb as they look.
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 4:30am
No, you can only state what *you* believe to be the way things should be
run. And from the looks of things, that belief boils down to "Newcomers
to AW are inherently stupid and need to be told every single detail of
how the business operates before becoming a full-fledged citizen of AW."
Once again, as numerous people have previously stated, that's why
there's a website.
As Flagg has stated in another post, he already offered to replace one
of the free citships with yours, and you essentially ignored it. And I
think it's plain to everyone else here that you do *not* have everyone
else's interest at heart and are only here to cause trouble. So, for
your sake more than ours, I suggest you find more productive ways to
spend your final days here in AW. We've heard all your arguments, and
you've heard ours, so let's end this, shall we?
[View Quote]
> My citizenship hasn't run out, and Active Worlds hasn't refunded me
> anything. So this is how I plan on spending my "dying days" on Active
> Worlds.
>
> I want you guys to know what has happened. The more people you sucker in
> the more money Active Worlds gets to develop the program, so I can
> understand why you are not going to take the position I am.
>
> I have nothing to lose, I bought no world. I can tell the truth and state
> ways the service could be run more fairly.
>
[View Quote]> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B90490D.7040601 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
>
> know
>
|
--
Goober King
At least we'll have one less idiot to deal with...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Sep 1, 2001, 5:57am
give it a rest flagg has already proved your just
trying to get attention they offered to refund you
and you refused so shut up and im not so sure aw
would be too unhappy to see YOU leave :P
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> My citizenship hasn't run out, and Active Worlds hasn't refunded me
> anything. So this is how I plan on spending my "dying days" on Active
> Worlds.
>
> I want you guys to know what has happened. The more people you sucker in
> the more money Active Worlds gets to develop the program, so I can
> understand why you are not going to take the position I am.
>
> I have nothing to lose, I bought no world. I can tell the truth and state
> ways the service could be run more fairly.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B90490D.7040601 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> know
|
Sep 1, 2001, 6:00am
how does something FREE have a 20 dollar value LOL
ooh i ahve a free watch it has a million dollar
value cause i think i should be refunded that much
cause i already have a watch LOL
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> "Free citizens that come with a world have no value, they are a free gift
> (no
> matter how you want to look at it)."
>
> They appear to have a $20 value, please give me something accurate Flagg
>
> "When you orginally contacted us via e-mail what you wanted was the ability
> to change AW's backdrop and you were upset that you had to buy a world if
> you wanted backdrop control. Then you felt that we had mislead you because
> you relized worlds came with free
> citizens and you had to buy yours."
>
> I DID feel misled back in Jan, but still liked the program so I figured
> "well, if there was a way I could change the background it wouldn't matter
> if I had a world cause I don't need to create new objects or have my own
> avatars." The background is the feature I wanted. I came to you guys
> working with your system you have in place asking "hey, if you are going to
> add a citizen with a world I don't need, then give me the background I
> need". That is the offer I made, if you refused it fine NO MONEY FOR YOU
> THEN. Please give me something accurate Flagg, you are not seeing my
> position clearly if you assumed I didn't feel misled FROM THE VERY START in
> January when I found out worlds came with a citizenship WHICH Active Worlds
> DOES sell for about $20.00.
>
> If you were going to refund anything, why didn't close my account, credit my
> $20 to a world or refund it entirely. You didn't, you held on to it like a
> grubby salesman. Now you say you would have. Well, I am saying Active
> Worlds could have, and they DIDN'T.
>
> "I fully understand the issue revolving around this thread and the orginal
> issue you had with us months ago."
>
> You obviously don't, you are just making up false arguments to make me look
> bad. My offer was to pay Activeworlds on a 2 year plan, where in the end
> you would have more money. You refused that. Now you can walk away
> with -$180, you only have $20 of my money.
>
> "flagg" <tom at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8fe8b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> (no
> at
> a
> via
> were
> you
> your
> you
|
Sep 1, 2001, 6:03am
> Charging 20 for a citizen and then giving one for free with a purchase of a
> world doesn't sell. I could have had a world with citizen.
so? they do this to sell the worlds more this way
you can have more bots are a cit to use as a
"privilege cit" so everything in the world is
built under the same person it was not first given
out to be used as a normal cit... i dont see how a
tourist would be able to run a well run world
without being a cit first?
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> Nothing to prove, this is decision, does Active Worlds want to make money?
> then they have to make a service as well as a product that SELLS!!!
>
|
>
[View Quote]> "kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b904c26 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> white
> i
> Flagg
> figured
> own
> going
> START
> Active
|
Sep 1, 2001, 6:04am
hmm can you explain what he lied about a little
further? just saying he lied makes you look like
an even bigger idiot
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> I will reply, and since there was a lot of inaccurate statements, I wanted
> to clarify them.
>
> Flagg is not making an accurate run down of the situation at hand. I don't
> think it is deliberate, and I don't care if it is, but I do want the truth
> to be out so I responded with the areas I felt needed clarification and
> correction.
>
> "builderz" <sawran at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B904419.3DA37C4C at yahoo.com...
> gift
> ability
> if
> because
> matter
> to
> YOU
> in
> Worlds
> credit my
> like a
> orginal
> look
> end
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:16am
I would agree, the ability to run a well made room is not only subjective
but irrelevant to the rights of a user of Active Worlds to know before they
purchase a citizenship at register now, that citizenships are also provided
with worlds. This would have saved money in the long run. Where does the
extra $20 go to that could have been applied towards the world with citizen?
RIGHT TO ACTIVEWORLDS
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B9093CC.53F9295B at yahoo.com...
of a
> so? they do this to sell the worlds more this way
> you can have more bots are a cit to use as a
> "privilege cit" so everything in the world is
> built under the same person it was not first given
> out to be used as a normal cit... i dont see how a
> tourist would be able to run a well run world
> without being a cit first?
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
money?
>
peace......
have
free
the
world
you
wouldn't
my
guys
background I
FOR
my
Active
it
make me
the
away
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:17am
I didn't say he lied, I said he was inaccurate like your reading is.
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B909406.62D8A62C at yahoo.com...
> hmm can you explain what he lied about a little
> further? just saying he lied makes you look like
> an even bigger idiot
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
wanted
don't
truth
Flagg
world
figured
own
guys
going
I
FOR
START
Active
me
the
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:21am
Activeworlds charged me $20 for a citizenship. If you want to call that
something free without value, go ahead. Again, that is inaccurate.
Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
$100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B9092F6.5CFFC43C at yahoo.com...
> how does something FREE have a 20 dollar value LOL
> ooh i ahve a free watch it has a million dollar
> value cause i think i should be refunded that much
> cause i already have a watch LOL
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
gift
ability
if
because
matter
to
YOU
in
Worlds
credit my
like a
orginal
look
end
answered
17th.
gift
prices
them
have
already
you
us
Then
and we
for
you
in
orginal
what
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:25am
As Flagg has stated in another post, he already offered to replace one
of the free citships with yours, and you essentially ignored it.
I never did such a thing. I am here now because no one refunded the money I
paid. If it was refunded I would have bought a world and be building instead
of bickering with you guys about somethingt that seems obvious:
Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
$100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B907FB4.4070206 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> No, you can only state what *you* believe to be the way things should be
> run. And from the looks of things, that belief boils down to "Newcomers
> to AW are inherently stupid and need to be told every single detail of
> how the business operates before becoming a full-fledged citizen of AW."
> Once again, as numerous people have previously stated, that's why
> there's a website.
>
> As Flagg has stated in another post, he already offered to replace one
> of the free citships with yours, and you essentially ignored it. And I
> think it's plain to everyone else here that you do *not* have everyone
> else's interest at heart and are only here to cause trouble. So, for
> your sake more than ours, I suggest you find more productive ways to
> spend your final days here in AW. We've heard all your arguments, and
> you've heard ours, so let's end this, shall we?
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
in
state
to
which
did
know.
WORLDS
why
browser
don't
the
on
found
"hiding"
even
have
you
bingo
for
over
much,
charged
to
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> At least we'll have one less idiot to deal with...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:26am
"they offered to refund you and you refused so shut up"
I never did such a thing. I am here now because no one refunded the money I
paid. If it was refunded I would have bought a world and be building instead
of bickering with you guys about somethingt that seems obvious:
Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
$100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B909263.B7E30836 at yahoo.com...
> give it a rest flagg has already proved your just
> trying to get attention they offered to refund you
> and you refused so shut up and im not so sure aw
> would be too unhappy to see YOU leave :P
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
in
state
give to
or
disclosing
which
did
citizenship.
know.
WORLDS
why
would
browser
and
contact
don't
new
the
build
on
Server
found
a
"hiding"
even
have
you
bingo
for
new
over
much,
People
after
your
could
have
charged
more
to
that
???
|
Sep 1, 2001, 10:24am
stupid gnome! you've misinterpreted URL for a link to a webpage... a URL is
just an adress of something on a network, that's the URL of an NG post, not
a HTML webpage!
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b903a5d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry that url didn't work, can you send a url that ends in ".htm"
>
> It tried opening something in AOL.
>
> "builderz" <sawran at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B8FD735.AFD0A97D at yahoo.com...
to
> a
> Flagg
> the
which
did
> make
> THEY
> saying
WORLDS
> don't
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 10:26am
THERE IS NO Fing LOGIC IN IT!!!! IF YOU CAN'T SEE THAT, THEN SHUT THE F UP!
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b90c5f9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "they offered to refund you and you refused so shut up"
>
> I never did such a thing. I am here now because no one refunded the money
I
> paid. If it was refunded I would have bought a world and be building
instead
> of bickering with you guys about somethingt that seems obvious:
>
> Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
>
> Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
> Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
> second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
>
> $100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
>
> "the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B909263.B7E30836 at yahoo.com...
> in
> state
don't
> give to
intent
> or
> disclosing
> which
they
> did
> citizenship.
am
> know.
> WORLDS
and
> why
> would
> browser
that
> and
> contact
> don't
> new
"get
> the
purchasing
> build
pages
> on
> Server
> found
get
> a
> "hiding"
> even
I
> have
could
> you
> bingo
about?
he
intended
> for
> new
and
> over
> much,
own
> People
I
> after
for
had
> your
STINGY
> could
> have
them
> charged
> more
want
> to
I
> that
> ???
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 11:24am
Well laddy da! There IS NO Plan A and Plan B. You get the cit. Too bad.
AWCOM scammed you in such a horrible way, but they're not going to change it
for you. Apparently, they don't want to make "money" the way you do, so let
them go on scamming the entire AW uniserver and continue concentrating on
lightening that big head of yours. I didn't pay 20 bucks to read this crap,
you don't see me looking for a refund.
Nornny
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b90c4bd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Activeworlds charged me $20 for a citizenship. If you want to call that
> something free without value, go ahead. Again, that is inaccurate.
>
> Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
>
> Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
> Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
> second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
>
> $100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
|
Sep 1, 2001, 3:42pm
anyone know how long it'll take before they bann this idiot from the
newsgroup?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b90d3ee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> THERE IS NO Fing LOGIC IN IT!!!! IF YOU CAN'T SEE THAT, THEN SHUT THE F
UP!
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90c5f9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
money
> I
> instead
free
Active
sucker
> don't
"your
> intent
tourist
> they
I
> am
person
ACTIVE
> and
> that
program
I
first
Most
> "get
> purchasing
> pages
and
> get
AWC
free.
> I
another
> could
a
> about?
> he
> intended
cool
> and
so
> own
how:
> I
> for
> had
got
> STINGY
would
> them
buy
> want
if
> I
turn?
cybersex,
ON
change
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 4:07pm
Fine, if you don't want to end this, I will. This will be my last post
on this subject, and I think everyone else should follow suit and let
this man "die" in peace. But before I go, I will leave you with this:
If you think they were just going to fork over the money you gave them,
then you've got another thing coming. What Flagg was planning to do was
include the cost of your current citship with that of the world, which
would mean you would pay $80 for a world and it would automatically
renew your current citship.
If you got your citship, and then decided to buy a world months later,
you can't expect them to give you your money back when you've already
used your citship for several months. Having them refund your money
would mean that you essentially got a citship for those months for free.
That would be like buying some batteries for your radio, then after
using them for a few months, finding out they sell a radio that comes
with batteries, so you expect them to give you the money back for the
batteries you already used if you were to buy the other radio. Sorry,
jefe, the real world doesn't work that way.
[View Quote]
> As Flagg has stated in another post, he already offered to replace one
> of the free citships with yours, and you essentially ignored it.
>
> I never did such a thing. I am here now because no one refunded the money I
> paid. If it was refunded I would have bought a world and be building instead
> of bickering with you guys about somethingt that seems obvious:
>
> Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
>
> Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
> Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
> second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
>
> $100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
>
>
[View Quote]> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B907FB4.4070206 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
>
> in
>
> state
>
> to
>
> which
>
> did
>
> know.
>
> WORLDS
>
> why
>
> browser
>
> don't
>
> the
>
> on
>
> found
>
> "hiding"
>
> even
>
> have
>
> you
>
> bingo
>
> for
>
> over
>
> much,
>
> charged
>
> to
>
|
--
Goober King
Rest in peace... Lord knows we could use some around here...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Sep 1, 2001, 5:04pm
Ah someone in the know said , you can't ban someone for being a fucking
idiot. Unless he gets really offencive... he can keep ranting on like this.
SO just ignore him. Or even better filter, since I've never seen him say
ANYTHING worth while.
Sep 1, 2001, 6:07pm
There is no extra 20 dollars the citizens are being thrown in at a loss to
active worlds because they're free. The term "Their loss is your gain" does
not apply here.
Derek, I suggest you follow my suit and say that your next post will be the
last on this issue. :) We don't care is working, but it's annoying the
heck out of the other posters here. So... this will be my last post on
this issue. And we don't care about your delusions of corporate conspiracy,
marcus. Suffer in peace.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b90c389$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I would agree, the ability to run a well made room is not only subjective
> but irrelevant to the rights of a user of Active Worlds to know before
they
> purchase a citizenship at register now, that citizenships are also
provided
> with worlds. This would have saved money in the long run. Where does the
> extra $20 go to that could have been applied towards the world with
citizen?
> RIGHT TO ACTIVEWORLDS
>
> "the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B9093CC.53F9295B at yahoo.com...
> of a
> money?
it
is
> peace......
lets
> have
previous
> free
accurate
> the
> world
> you
> wouldn't
have
> my
you
> guys
are
> background I
MONEY
> FOR
seeing
> my
VERY
> Active
account,
to
> it
the
> make me
in
> the
> away
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:12pm
"AWCOM scammed you in such a horrible way, but they're not going to change
it
for you. Apparently, they don't want to make "money" the way you do, so let
them go on scamming the entire AW uniserver..."
I concur fully
[View Quote]"nornny" <Nornny1 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b90e17e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well laddy da! There IS NO Plan A and Plan B. You get the cit. Too bad.
> AWCOM scammed you in such a horrible way, but they're not going to change
it
> for you. Apparently, they don't want to make "money" the way you do, so
let
> them go on scamming the entire AW uniserver and continue concentrating on
> lightening that big head of yours. I didn't pay 20 bucks to read this
crap,
> you don't see me looking for a refund.
>
> Nornny
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90c4bd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
free
>
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:14pm
Whatever it was, it didn't send me somewhere I could make use of. Please
send something that ends in ".htm" or ".asp"
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b90d36b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> stupid gnome! you've misinterpreted URL for a link to a webpage... a URL
is
> just an adress of something on a network, that's the URL of an NG post,
not
> a HTML webpage!
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b903a5d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> to
or
disclosing
> which
> did
know.
of
> WORLDS
why
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:19pm
"What Flagg was planning to do was include the cost of your current citship
with that of the world, which would mean you would pay $80 for a world and
it would automatically
renew your current citship."
If I paid $20 and the world costs $80, then the difference is $60 and that
is WHAT I WILL PAY. I will not pay $100 for a citzenship and world. If I
want to renew, then I will pay the $20 when the year comes up which will
come to $100 and that year has not come up yet. I have no $80 world
including citizenship, so I see no reason at the moment to send a check for
$60 to Activeworlds.
If they are going to sell me a world for $80 including citizenship and use
$20 I already paid, let's see them do it!!! this is just talk, let's see
them actually do it then!!
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B912323.6030803 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Fine, if you don't want to end this, I will. This will be my last post
> on this subject, and I think everyone else should follow suit and let
> this man "die" in peace. But before I go, I will leave you with this:
>
> If you think they were just going to fork over the money you gave them,
> then you've got another thing coming. What Flagg was planning to do was
> include the cost of your current citship with that of the world, which
> would mean you would pay $80 for a world and it would automatically
> renew your current citship.
>
> If you got your citship, and then decided to buy a world months later,
> you can't expect them to give you your money back when you've already
> used your citship for several months. Having them refund your money
> would mean that you essentially got a citship for those months for free.
> That would be like buying some batteries for your radio, then after
> using them for a few months, finding out they sell a radio that comes
> with batteries, so you expect them to give you the money back for the
> batteries you already used if you were to buy the other radio. Sorry,
> jefe, the real world doesn't work that way.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
money I
instead
free
give
or
disclosing
citizenship.
would
and
contact
new
build
Server
a
new
People
after
your
could
have
more
that
???
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> Rest in peace... Lord knows we could use some around here...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:23pm
When you register for a citizenship you pay $20.
I am being told if I want a world I have to pay $80.
That's 100$
Do the math, there is $20 that I spent I could have put towards a world with
citizenship.
Active Worlds has not to this date given me a world to setup or charged me
$60 which would have been the difference for the purchase of the smallest
world.
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b91401c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There is no extra 20 dollars the citizens are being thrown in at a loss to
> active worlds because they're free. The term "Their loss is your gain"
does
> not apply here.
>
> Derek, I suggest you follow my suit and say that your next post will be
the
> last on this issue. :) We don't care is working, but it's annoying the
> heck out of the other posters here. So... this will be my last post on
> this issue. And we don't care about your delusions of corporate
conspiracy,
> marcus. Suffer in peace.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90c389$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
subjective
> they
> provided
the
> citizen?
purchase
let
> it
> is
> lets
I
> previous
a
> accurate
was
a
mislead
I
> have
> you
> are
> MONEY
> seeing
> VERY
> account,
> to
saying
> the
> in
walk
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:40pm
"If you got your citship, and then decided to buy a world months later...."
Bzzzzz, WRONG!!! My citizenship runs out at the end of december. It was in
Jan (about 2-3 weeks after acquiring my citizenship)that I wanted to
switchover to a world cause that is when I found out Active Worlds gives at
least one citizenship with the purcahse of a world.
I haven't used my citizenship for building like I would have if I had a
world. That is what I am trying to tell you. I stopped building in March.
In april I feel I still used the services to show friends of mine what I
built, but now the world I built it in is gone. If I had my own world like I
requested in Jan and did the switchover, I would still have it. At least I
have Xelagot backup of the build and if the world comes back I can have the
owner rebuild it for me hopefully.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B912323.6030803 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Fine, if you don't want to end this, I will. This will be my last post
> on this subject, and I think everyone else should follow suit and let
> this man "die" in peace. But before I go, I will leave you with this:
>
> If you think they were just going to fork over the money you gave them,
> then you've got another thing coming. What Flagg was planning to do was
> include the cost of your current citship with that of the world, which
> would mean you would pay $80 for a world and it would automatically
> renew your current citship.
>
> If you got your citship, and then decided to buy a world months later,
> you can't expect them to give you your money back when you've already
> used your citship for several months. Having them refund your money
> would mean that you essentially got a citship for those months for free.
> That would be like buying some batteries for your radio, then after
> using them for a few months, finding out they sell a radio that comes
> with batteries, so you expect them to give you the money back for the
> batteries you already used if you were to buy the other radio. Sorry,
> jefe, the real world doesn't work that way.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
money I
instead
free
give
or
disclosing
citizenship.
would
and
contact
new
build
Server
a
new
People
after
your
could
have
more
that
???
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> Rest in peace... Lord knows we could use some around here...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:47pm
sorry guys, but I can't resist replying to stupid gnomes, that's just how I
am...
Marcus, what you didn't understand was that YOU'D SAVED YOUR 20 BUCKS IF
YOU'D TAKEN THEIR OFFER!!!! because then your cit would've been renewed, and
would be renewed with your world every year (I think) anyway, so you'dve
saved a lotta money... and honestly, asking for a $50 discount out of
nowhere, what did you expect?
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b9151ba$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When you register for a citizenship you pay $20.
>
> I am being told if I want a world I have to pay $80.
>
> That's 100$
>
> Do the math, there is $20 that I spent I could have put towards a world
with
> citizenship.
> Active Worlds has not to this date given me a world to setup or charged me
> $60 which would have been the difference for the purchase of the smallest
> world.
>
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91401c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
> does
> the
> conspiracy,
> subjective
> the
> purchase
make
SELLS!!!
> let
black
feel
> I
are
> a
> was
buy
> a
> mislead
so
> I
to
you
THE
WHICH
on
> saying
and
to
where
> walk
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 7:52pm
I never asked for a $50 discount, do the math:
$80 (world with citizenship)
-$20 citizenship (already paid)
______________________________
$60 remaining balance
If there is any sign of discount, it is $20 which I already gave before even
using it. No one can be a citizen unless they pay upfront.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b915773 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sorry guys, but I can't resist replying to stupid gnomes, that's just how
I
> am...
>
> Marcus, what you didn't understand was that YOU'D SAVED YOUR 20 BUCKS IF
> YOU'D TAKEN THEIR OFFER!!!! because then your cit would've been renewed,
and
> would be renewed with your world every year (I think) anyway, so you'dve
> saved a lotta money... and honestly, asking for a $50 discount out of
> nowhere, what did you expect?
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b9151ba$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> with
me
smallest
loss
> to
gain"
be
the
on
before
does
> make
> SELLS!!!
cant
> black
>
> feel
> are
wanted
> buy
> so
or
> to
> you
NO
> THE
> WHICH
held
> on
> and
arguments
> to
> where
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:03pm
you did, Flagg told the entire community... oh well, just don't accept that
you're wrong...
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b91588a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I never asked for a $50 discount, do the math:
>
> $80 (world with citizenship)
> -$20 citizenship (already paid)
> ______________________________
> $60 remaining balance
>
>
> If there is any sign of discount, it is $20 which I already gave before
even
> using it. No one can be a citizen unless they pay upfront.
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b915773 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
how
> I
> and
world
charged
> me
> smallest
> loss
> gain"
> be
> the
post
> on
> before
> does
with
> cant
in
issue
a
they
something
> wanted
to
program
it
objects
> or
came
if
the
> NO
not
FROM
my
> held
am
thread
> arguments
can
>
>
|
|