|
Value of a cit (Community)
Value of a cit // Community
Sep 1, 2001, 9:37pm
i think you are too young to understand thats
basically what he said he would do... just give it
up if you stop complaining it might not be too
late to accept the deal
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> As Flagg has stated in another post, he already offered to replace one
> of the free citships with yours, and you essentially ignored it.
>
> I never did such a thing. I am here now because no one refunded the money I
> paid. If it was refunded I would have bought a world and be building instead
> of bickering with you guys about somethingt that seems obvious:
>
> Can't anybody else see the logic in this?
>
> Plan A: $80 for a world with citizenship
> Plan B: Pay $20 for citizenship, then later pay $80 for a world and a free
> second citizenship you don't need making a total of $100 ($80+$20)
>
> $100 or $80? I would rather go with $80, Plan A
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B907FB4.4070206 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> in
> state
> to
> which
> did
> know.
> WORLDS
> why
> browser
> don't
> the
> on
> found
> "hiding"
> even
> have
> you
> bingo
> for
> over
> much,
> charged
> to
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:42pm
like i said i think youre too young to understand
whats at hand they said theyd move your cit over
to the world and thus when you renewed the world
it would renew your cit. you cant expect them to
refund money youve used for 1 or 2 months already.
i think since youre so young (or acting like it
anyway) you think the world should revolve around
you and that aw is trying to cheat you out of
money
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> "If you got your citship, and then decided to buy a world months later...."
>
> Bzzzzz, WRONG!!! My citizenship runs out at the end of december. It was in
> Jan (about 2-3 weeks after acquiring my citizenship)that I wanted to
> switchover to a world cause that is when I found out Active Worlds gives at
> least one citizenship with the purcahse of a world.
>
> I haven't used my citizenship for building like I would have if I had a
> world. That is what I am trying to tell you. I stopped building in March.
> In april I feel I still used the services to show friends of mine what I
> built, but now the world I built it in is gone. If I had my own world like I
> requested in Jan and did the switchover, I would still have it. At least I
> have Xelagot backup of the build and if the world comes back I can have the
> owner rebuild it for me hopefully.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B912323.6030803 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> money I
> instead
> free
> give
> or
> disclosing
> citizenship.
> would
> and
> contact
> new
> build
> Server
> a
> new
> People
> after
> your
> could
> have
> more
> that
> ???
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:45pm
i guess i got so annoyed by the idiot i forgot how
long this thread got *hits his filter button* bye
m a r c u s
[View Quote]sw chris wrote:
>
> There is no extra 20 dollars the citizens are being thrown in at a loss to
> active worlds because they're free. The term "Their loss is your gain" does
> not apply here.
>
> Derek, I suggest you follow my suit and say that your next post will be the
> last on this issue. :) We don't care is working, but it's annoying the
> heck out of the other posters here. So... this will be my last post on
> this issue. And we don't care about your delusions of corporate conspiracy,
> marcus. Suffer in peace.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90c389$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> they
> provided
> citizen?
> it
> is
> lets
> previous
> accurate
> have
> you
> are
> MONEY
> seeing
> VERY
> account,
> to
> the
> in
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:46pm
whats the differenc ebetween inaccurate and lying
lol dammit my filter hasnt worked yet but since it
hasnt i cant resists replying :P
[View Quote]m a r c u s wrote:
>
> I didn't say he lied, I said he was inaccurate like your reading is.
>
> "the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B909406.62D8A62C at yahoo.com...
> wanted
> don't
> truth
> Flagg
> world
> figured
> own
> guys
> going
> I
> FOR
> START
> Active
> me
> the
|
Sep 1, 2001, 9:47pm
lmao i think i want a refund too
[View Quote]nornny wrote:
>
> Well laddy da! There IS NO Plan A and Plan B. You get the cit. Too bad.
> AWCOM scammed you in such a horrible way, but they're not going to change it
> for you. Apparently, they don't want to make "money" the way you do, so let
> them go on scamming the entire AW uniserver and continue concentrating on
> lightening that big head of yours. I didn't pay 20 bucks to read this crap,
> you don't see me looking for a refund.
>
> Nornny
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90c4bd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
Sep 2, 2001, 12:00am
I never did. Just because Flagg said something to the "entire community"
doesn't mean it is 100% accurate.
I know I never asked for a $50 discount. I paid $20, and a world costs 80.
The difference is $60. I am more than willing to pay the $60, but they
wanted $80 even after I paid for a citizenship.
If I really wanted a $50 discount then it would be because I actually bought
2 citizenships and there would have been $10 remaining I would have had to
have paid. I haven't asked for that nor did I do that. My choice in buying
2 citizenships was not because I wanted a world. So, I am not requesting
one of the citizenships to be applied.
Also, they only give one citizenship for the smallest world which I would
have bought, so I only wanted to be credited 1 citizenship. Again, that is
$20 leaving a balance of $60
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b916939 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you did, Flagg told the entire community... oh well, just don't accept
that
> you're wrong...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91588a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> even
> how
IF
renewed,
you'dve
> world
> charged
will
annoying
> post
also
Where
> with
a
to
that
> in
> issue
I
in
> a
> they
> something
had
> to
had
> program
background
> it
> objects
> came
"hey,
> if
> the
fine
> not
> FROM
citizenship
> my
> am
> thread
plan,
> can
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 12:30am
Lying assumes an intent to deceive
Inaccurate just means it is NOT accurate (and therefore NOT 100% the truth).
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B91703A.2B2EC235 at yahoo.com...
> whats the differenc ebetween inaccurate and lying
> lol dammit my filter hasnt worked yet but since it
> hasnt i cant resists replying :P
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
I
and
have
previous
free
accurate
the
you
wouldn't
have my
you
are
background
MONEY
seeing my
VERY
Active
account,
to it
the
make
in
away
|
Sep 2, 2001, 12:33am
That has nothing to do with the premise at hand. What they would do
regarding renewal is not what I am addressing. After a year of owning a
world, then I would discuss renewal. Right now, all I want is 1 world, 1
citizenship.
I paid $20, and the world costs $80 for the smallest. That leaves $60 I
would owe them.
Seems simple enough to me. I am 27 years old by the way, so I am not that
young.
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B916F52.E2496CAF at yahoo.com...
> like i said i think youre too young to understand
> whats at hand they said theyd move your cit over
> to the world and thus when you renewed the world
> it would renew your cit. you cant expect them to
> refund money youve used for 1 or 2 months already.
> i think since youre so young (or acting like it
> anyway) you think the world should revolve around
> you and that aw is trying to cheat you out of
> money
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
later...."
in
at
March.
like I
least I
the
them,
was
free.
one
a
should be
"Newcomers
of
AW."
one
I
everyone
and
Active
sucker
and
don't
"your
intent
tourist
they
I am
person
ACTIVE
and
that
program
I
first
Most
"get
purchasing
pages
and
get
AWC
free. I
another
could
a
about?
he
intended
cool
and
so
own
how: I
for
had
got
STINGY
would
them
buy
want
if I
turn?
cybersex,
ON
change
|
Sep 2, 2001, 12:34am
What deal? The only deal I have seen is "pay $80 for a world"
I have paid $20 already, that leaves a balance owed of $60.
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B916E36.D926DC75 at yahoo.com...
> i think you are too young to understand thats
> basically what he said he would do... just give it
> up if you stop complaining it might not be too
> late to accept the deal
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
money I
instead
free
be
"Newcomers
AW."
Active
sucker
don't
give
intent or
disclosing
they
citizenship.
am
and
would
that
and
contact
new
"get
purchasing
build
pages
Server
get a
I
could
about?
he
intended
new
and
own
People
I
after
for
had
your
STINGY
could
have
them
more
want
I
that
???
|
Sep 2, 2001, 12:54am
holy omg i dont think ive ever seen a longer thread
um dont you all think thsi one should um well i dont know die off haha
146 total replys to it includeign this one sheesh :)
has to be a record
[View Quote]"moff piett" <piett at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b913125$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ah someone in the know said , you can't ban someone for being a fucking
> idiot. Unless he gets really offencive... he can keep ranting on like
this.
> SO just ignore him. Or even better filter, since I've never seen him say
> ANYTHING worth while.
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 12:58am
ahem netscape says 160...oops 161 :o) lol
[View Quote]nova wrote:
>
> holy omg i dont think ive ever seen a longer thread
> um dont you all think thsi one should um well i dont know die off haha
> 146 total replys to it includeign this one sheesh :)
> has to be a record
> "moff piett" <piett at home.com> wrote in message
> news:3b913125$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this.
|
Sep 2, 2001, 1:32am
KAH, there IS logic, just open your eyes to see it.
Why have a second account, you don't need, and pay $20 more? It seems
pointless to me. I'd rather only to get my world without the cit for $20
less than a world with a cit I won't use.
--
Lanezeri
Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
http://aw.stuff-x.com
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b90d3ee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> THERE IS NO Fing LOGIC IN IT!!!! IF YOU CAN'T SEE THAT, THEN SHUT THE F
UP!
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90c5f9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
money
> I
> instead
free
Active
sucker
> don't
"your
> intent
tourist
> they
I
> am
person
ACTIVE
> and
> that
program
I
first
Most
> "get
> purchasing
> pages
and
> get
AWC
free.
> I
another
> could
a
> about?
> he
> intended
cool
> and
so
> own
how:
> I
> for
> had
got
> STINGY
would
> them
buy
> want
if
> I
turn?
cybersex,
ON
change
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 4:15am
Come on KAH... :) I don't want to keep checking this thread through
December.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b916939 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you did, Flagg told the entire community... oh well, just don't accept
that
> you're wrong...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91588a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> even
> how
IF
renewed,
you'dve
> world
> charged
will
annoying
> post
also
Where
> with
a
to
that
> in
> issue
I
in
> a
> they
> something
had
> to
had
> program
background
> it
> objects
> came
"hey,
> if
> the
fine
> not
> FROM
citizenship
> my
> am
> thread
plan,
> can
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:15am
in that case, you're stupid.
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b919a89$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That has nothing to do with the premise at hand. What they would do
> regarding renewal is not what I am addressing. After a year of owning a
> world, then I would discuss renewal. Right now, all I want is 1 world, 1
> citizenship.
>
> I paid $20, and the world costs $80 for the smallest. That leaves $60 I
> would owe them.
>
> Seems simple enough to me. I am 27 years old by the way, so I am not that
> young.
>
> "the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B916F52.E2496CAF at yahoo.com...
> later...."
was
> in
gives
> at
a
> March.
I
> like I
> least I
have
> the
post
let
this:
> them,
> was
which
later,
already
> free.
comes
the
Sorry,
> one
the
building
and
> a
> should be
> "Newcomers
detail
> of
of
> AW."
> one
And
> I
> everyone
for
to
> and
me
> Active
> sucker
can
> and
> don't
> "your
to
> intent
> tourist
that
> they
and
> I am
> person
> ACTIVE
button
> and
it
the
> that
> program
opinion,
> I
> first
> Most
> "get
> purchasing
and
> pages
World
> and
*do*
> get
isn't
> AWC
> free. I
> another
> could
in
> a
> about?
which
> he
> intended
> cool
over
> and
> so
your
> own
> how: I
citizenship,
citizenship
> for
but
you
> had
> got
> STINGY
you
> would
paying
> them
world,
> buy
to
> want
than
> if I
be
> turn?
> cybersex,
bill
GOING
> ON
my
> change
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:18am
AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! don't you understand that those cits are ****FREE****,
they aren't included in the price, you pay exactly $0.00 for the cits, but
if the world costs $10, you pay exactly $10 (plus tax if applicable) FOR THE
WORLD **ITSELF**!! And he could've saved his 20 bucks anyway, if he had
taken Flagg's offer...
KAH
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3b91a830 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> KAH, there IS logic, just open your eyes to see it.
>
> Why have a second account, you don't need, and pay $20 more? It seems
> pointless to me. I'd rather only to get my world without the cit for $20
> less than a world with a cit I won't use.
>
> --
>
> Lanezeri
> Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
> http://aw.stuff-x.com
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b90d3ee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> UP!
> money
> free
me
> Active
> sucker
and
> "your
to
> tourist
that
and
> I
> person
> ACTIVE
button
it
the
> program
opinion,
> I
> first
> Most
and
World
> and
*do*
isn't
> AWC
> free.
> another
in
> a
which
> cool
over
> so
your
> how:
citizenship,
citizenship
but
you
> got
you
> would
paying
world,
> buy
to
than
> if
be
> turn?
> cybersex,
bill
GOING
> ON
my
> change
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:20am
I'm a flame samurai... never give in ;-))
KAH
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b91ce91 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Come on KAH... :) I don't want to keep checking this thread through
> December.
> SW Chris
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b916939 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that
before
just
BUCKS
> IF
> renewed,
> you'dve
of
a
your
> will
> annoying
know
> also
> Where
with
> a
citizen.
want
> to
he
> that
delusions
as
> I
> in
> had
> had
> background
I
> "hey,
me
> fine
are
> citizenship
close
you
I
> plan,
you
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 11:42am
This will be my last post on the issue as you are obviously too dense to understand the "premise" of AW's pricing system.
The world costs $80 and includes a GIFT citizenship. Your current citizenship (that you're using to post) cost you $20. If you want to buy a world, you pay the same price as everyone else and recieve the same gift as everyone else. Flagg said he offered to make your citizenship the one that is associated with the world and refund your money that you had already spent on the citizenship. You apparently declined and countered with an insane offer.
Since you won't even except what you're demanding, I think you should just do everyone a favor and shut up about the whole thing.
-Agent1
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3b919ad2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What deal? The only deal I have seen is "pay $80 for a world"
>
> I have paid $20 already, that leaves a balance owed of $60.
|
Sep 2, 2001, 1:17pm
Never mind.. I'm changing.. this will just screw that up..
--
Lanezeri
Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
http://aw.stuff-x.com
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b92237c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! don't you understand that those cits are
****FREE****,
> they aren't included in the price, you pay exactly $0.00 for the cits, but
> if the world costs $10, you pay exactly $10 (plus tax if applicable) FOR
THE
> WORLD **ITSELF**!! And he could've saved his 20 bucks anyway, if he had
> taken Flagg's offer...
>
> KAH
>
> "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91a830 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
$20
F
a
> me
can
> and
either.
I
you
> to
> that
> and
> button
> it
> the
world
you
> opinion,
to
> and
the
> World
https://www.activeworlds.com/ssl/buyworld/)
> *do*
> isn't
consumer.
you
> in
> which
your
> over
schemes
> your
costs.
is
> citizenship,
> citizenship
> but
> you
they
> you
> paying
> world,
to
> to
> than
> be
> bill
of
> GOING
forfeit
> my
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 1:44pm
I wouldn't know which other VR chat program is available on the net,
surely they should give you a free 3D glasses to pretend it is 2D/3D
:)~
[View Quote]zero wrote:
>
> Thank you Flagg, proving once again and dispelling another myth, that the
> employees of aw do not read what people say in here.
> Also I might add a correction to my own post, I meant to say, "you can not
> please any of you."
> Go ahead and try any of the other VR chat programs, see what you get for
> "features" or for content.
> You will come crawling back to aw.
|
Sep 2, 2001, 2:47pm
I am stupid because I want to pay the DIFFERENCE not the DIFFERENCE + WHAT
I ALREADY PAID again?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b9222cf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> in that case, you're stupid.
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b919a89$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
1
that
> was
> gives
had
> a
what
> I
world
> have
> post
> let
> this:
do
> which
automatically
> later,
> already
money
after
> comes
> the
> Sorry,
replace
> the
> building
> and
($80+$20)
> detail
> of
why
replace
> And
> for
ways
> to
arguments,
refunded
> me
> can
truth
I
you
> to
> that
> and
> button
> it
> the
world
you
> opinion,
to
> and
the
> World
https://www.activeworlds.com/ssl/buyworld/)
> *do*
> isn't
consumer.
you
> in
> which
your
> over
schemes
> your
costs.
is
> citizenship,
> citizenship
> but
> you
they
> you
> paying
> world,
to
> to
> than
> be
> bill
of
> GOING
forfeit
> my
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 2:49pm
I didn't refuse any offer for refund. That is not true. I will accept the
refund. That is the whole point in me bringing it up in Jan, it's the
reason I brought it up in NG earlier on, and it is why I am here now
discussing it.
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b923734$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This will be my last post on the issue as you are obviously too dense to
understand the "premise" of AW's pricing system.
>
> The world costs $80 and includes a GIFT citizenship. Your current
citizenship (that you're using to post) cost you $20. If you want to buy a
world, you pay the same price as everyone else and recieve the same gift as
everyone else. Flagg said he offered to make your citizenship the one that
is associated with the world and refund your money that you had already
spent on the citizenship. You apparently declined and countered with an
insane offer.
>
> Since you won't even except what you're demanding, I think you should just
do everyone a favor and shut up about the whole thing.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b919ad2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 2:51pm
If Active Worlds is going to refund my citizenships, let's see them do it!!
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b92237c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! don't you understand that those cits are
****FREE****,
> they aren't included in the price, you pay exactly $0.00 for the cits, but
> if the world costs $10, you pay exactly $10 (plus tax if applicable) FOR
THE
> WORLD **ITSELF**!! And he could've saved his 20 bucks anyway, if he had
> taken Flagg's offer...
>
> KAH
>
> "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91a830 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
$20
F
a
> me
can
> and
either.
I
you
> to
> that
> and
> button
> it
> the
world
you
> opinion,
to
> and
the
> World
https://www.activeworlds.com/ssl/buyworld/)
> *do*
> isn't
consumer.
you
> in
> which
your
> over
schemes
> your
costs.
is
> citizenship,
> citizenship
> but
> you
they
> you
> paying
> world,
to
> to
> than
> be
> bill
of
> GOING
forfeit
> my
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 3:03pm
read Flagg's post first (or use YOUR MEMORY, you know, that stuff you use to
remember things)... He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day... but because you're too stubborn
to care about anything else than your demand you obviously rejected the
offer and have lost some money, AND probably some fun...
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b926394$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If Active Worlds is going to refund my citizenships, let's see them do
it!!
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92237c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ****FREE****,
but
> THE
> $20
THE
> F
the
building
and
> a
refunded
on
you
> can
truth
> either.
Master?
Flagg.
> I
says
> you
of
openly
button,
Yes,
of
> world
> you
they
option.
try
> to
world
> the
> https://www.activeworlds.com/ssl/buyworld/)
> consumer.
for
> you
months)
whining
> your
> schemes
> costs.
> is
year,
If
> they
world.
money,
probably
> to
anything
we
free
every
a
> of
> forfeit
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:25pm
"He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day"
Then he should have asked for $60 not $80, because I paid $20 already. Do
the math 80-20=60, 60 being the difference owed.
If I made a file for someone and charged them $20, and they later they came
to me weeks after asking for me to make them a website I would take the file
I made them, use that in the website and charge them $20 less that what I
would have because they already paid for that file. I would create a new
file and charge them $20. Now that is being stubborn and that is what
Active Worlds is doing. They only want money, and they won't see that I
ALREADY PAID FOR A CITIZENSHIP, I don't need 2 just like the person may not
need 2 files I make them for their site.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b926658 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> read Flagg's post first (or use YOUR MEMORY, you know, that stuff you use
to
> remember things)... He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
> cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
> saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day... but because you're too
stubborn
> to care about anything else than your demand you obviously rejected the
> offer and have lost some money, AND probably some fun...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b926394$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it!!
> but
FOR
had
seems
for
> THE
> the
> building
> and
($80+$20)
> refunded
> on
> you
I
> truth
> Master?
> Flagg.
> says
for
kind
> of
> openly
a
and
> button,
the
BUT
button.
> Yes,
section
> of
their
suggest
> they
> option.
> try
> world
of
Personal
you
AWC
> for
on
that
> months)
> whining
in
are
up
and
This
> year,
> If
> world.
> money,
> probably
need
> anything
richer
should
> we
> free
> every
myself
than
> a
out
IS
things
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:26pm
CORRECTION - I would NOT HAVE created a new file and charge them $20 again.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b92cddc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
> cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
> saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day"
>
> Then he should have asked for $60 not $80, because I paid $20 already. Do
> the math 80-20=60, 60 being the difference owed.
>
> If I made a file for someone and charged them $20, and they later they
came
> to me weeks after asking for me to make them a website I would take the
file
> I made them, use that in the website and charge them $20 less that what I
> would have because they already paid for that file. I would create a new
> file and charge them $20. Now that is being stubborn and that is what
> Active Worlds is doing. They only want money, and they won't see that I
> ALREADY PAID FOR A CITIZENSHIP, I don't need 2 just like the person may
not
> need 2 files I make them for their site.
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b926658 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
use
> to
world
> stubborn
cits,
> FOR
> had
> seems
> for
SHUT
refunded
obvious:
world
> ($80+$20)
days"
people
so
> I
am.
message
that
> for
> kind
inform
> a
> and
a
> the
> BUT
> button.
the
situation.
> section
a
> their
> suggest
and
of
all
> of
> Personal
> you
> AWC
away
world
> on
> that
newsgroup
> in
> are
see
issue
> up
> and
> This
citizenships.
that
me
a
> need
> richer
> should
have
> myself
> than
> out
> IS
> things
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 2:16pm
You still aren't getting it are you? I'll tell you some AW basics... a
citizenship ($19.95) only lasts for one (1) year, to continue to use a
citizenship, you have to renew it (another $19.95 for another year). The
free citizenships that come with worlds are renewed when the world is
renewed (no $19.95 charged). So, when you had renewed your **hypothetical**
P10 world with a 5 user limit ($10 for another year), the attached
citizenship would be renewed as well. So, if you had taken Flagg's offer to
attach your existing citizenship to your world, you wouldn't need to renew
it anymore, the renewal would be free. So, even if you didn't get your
$19.95 that you payed when you originally bought your citizenship, you would
have saved $19.95 every year. Ergo, you turned down an offer that would've
done exactly what you wanted (even more), just not immediately. Now will you
shut up? I'm tired off showing you your stupidity...
KAH
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b92ce2f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> CORRECTION - I would NOT HAVE created a new file and charge them $20
again.
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92cddc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Do
> came
> file
I
new
> not
<<<<SNiP>>>>>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 2:43pm
Do you renew your driver's license for the next year 3 weeks after getting
this years license?
Now let me show you some basic math kah
Do the math(I rounded the numbers):
$80 (world with citizenship)
-$20 citizenship (already paid)
______________________________
$60 remaining balance (This is the situation NOW)
If I want to continue after the year, then I would renew. That is the point
of "renewing". You have COMPLETED one period of time, so you will then
RENEW. If I was going to pay for 2 years of one citizenship, I would have
to "RENEW", Active Worlds would have charged something like this:
$100 (world with just the citizenship for 2 years)
-$20 citizenship (already paid)
______________________________
$80 remaining balance (This is the situation I would be faced with
assuming Flagg was accurate in saying he made the offer you are presenting
back in Jan. How different is than me getting a world and a citizen at the
end of this year? It would still be $100. I just don't see how me paying
$100 upfront is going to save anything. I have only paid $20 now for this.
Looks like I saved $80 by Active Worlds not allowing me to buy a world for
$60.
I do not see an email, a NG post, nor do I see an .html page that reflects
the second scenario which doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. Why
would I want to pay 3 citizenship fees upfront(especially after having given
them $40 for 2 citizenships when I only needed 1)?
Now addressing renewal, you are 4 months early because I have til December
to "renew" anything. In January, it would have been 11 months. When you
renew something, you do it at the time period it is expiring, so I wouldn't
be looking or expecting any kind of renewal offer til around December of
2001 when I might get a notice from Active Worlds saying something like,
"Dear valued citizen (ROFL), we noticed your citizenship is about to expire,
would you like to renew your citizenship? To do so, blah blah blah"
In any event, I didn't want a renewal of something I didn't even use for a
month. That is rediculous. Do you renew your driver's license for the next
year 3 weeks after getting this years license?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b93aced$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You still aren't getting it are you? I'll tell you some AW basics... a
> citizenship ($19.95) only lasts for one (1) year, to continue to use a
> citizenship, you have to renew it (another $19.95 for another year). The
> free citizenships that come with worlds are renewed when the world is
> renewed (no $19.95 charged). So, when you had renewed your
**hypothetical**
> P10 world with a 5 user limit ($10 for another year), the attached
> citizenship would be renewed as well. So, if you had taken Flagg's offer
to
> attach your existing citizenship to your world, you wouldn't need to renew
> it anymore, the renewal would be free. So, even if you didn't get your
> $19.95 that you payed when you originally bought your citizenship, you
would
> have saved $19.95 every year. Ergo, you turned down an offer that would've
> done exactly what you wanted (even more), just not immediately. Now will
you
> shut up? I'm tired off showing you your stupidity...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92ce2f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> again.
you'd
> Do
the
what
> I
> new
I
may
> <<<<SNiP>>>>>
>
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 2:46pm
CORRECTION - Looks like I saved $80 by Active Worlds not allowing me to pay
the remaining portion ($60) which I haven't given them for a world costing
$80.
I would be more than happy to, now when is that offer going to cross the
table?
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b93b315$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Do you renew your driver's license for the next year 3 weeks after getting
> this years license?
>
> Now let me show you some basic math kah
>
> Do the math(I rounded the numbers):
>
> $80 (world with citizenship)
> -$20 citizenship (already paid)
> ______________________________
> $60 remaining balance (This is the situation NOW)
>
> If I want to continue after the year, then I would renew. That is the
point
> of "renewing". You have COMPLETED one period of time, so you will then
> RENEW. If I was going to pay for 2 years of one citizenship, I would have
> to "RENEW", Active Worlds would have charged something like this:
>
> $100 (world with just the citizenship for 2 years)
> -$20 citizenship (already paid)
> ______________________________
> $80 remaining balance (This is the situation I would be faced with
> assuming Flagg was accurate in saying he made the offer you are presenting
> back in Jan. How different is than me getting a world and a citizen at
the
> end of this year? It would still be $100. I just don't see how me paying
> $100 upfront is going to save anything. I have only paid $20 now for
this.
> Looks like I saved $80 by Active Worlds not allowing me to buy a world for
> $60.
>
> I do not see an email, a NG post, nor do I see an .html page that reflects
> the second scenario which doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. Why
> would I want to pay 3 citizenship fees upfront(especially after having
given
> them $40 for 2 citizenships when I only needed 1)?
>
> Now addressing renewal, you are 4 months early because I have til December
> to "renew" anything. In January, it would have been 11 months. When you
> renew something, you do it at the time period it is expiring, so I
wouldn't
> be looking or expecting any kind of renewal offer til around December of
> 2001 when I might get a notice from Active Worlds saying something like,
> "Dear valued citizen (ROFL), we noticed your citizenship is about to
expire,
> would you like to renew your citizenship? To do so, blah blah blah"
>
> In any event, I didn't want a renewal of something I didn't even use for a
> month. That is rediculous. Do you renew your driver's license for the
next
> year 3 weeks after getting this years license?
>
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b93aced$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> **hypothetical**
> to
renew
> would
would've
> you
> you'd
already.
they
> the
> what
a
what
that
> I
> may
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 5:05pm
give it up filter him hes too stupid to get it hes
even too stupid to reply in ONE message
and marcus the 70 buck fee is a ONE TIME charge
stop saying its 80 bucks a year
[View Quote]kah wrote:
>
> You still aren't getting it are you? I'll tell you some AW basics... a
> citizenship ($19.95) only lasts for one (1) year, to continue to use a
> citizenship, you have to renew it (another $19.95 for another year). The
> free citizenships that come with worlds are renewed when the world is
> renewed (no $19.95 charged). So, when you had renewed your **hypothetical**
> P10 world with a 5 user limit ($10 for another year), the attached
> citizenship would be renewed as well. So, if you had taken Flagg's offer to
> attach your existing citizenship to your world, you wouldn't need to renew
> it anymore, the renewal would be free. So, even if you didn't get your
> $19.95 that you payed when you originally bought your citizenship, you would
> have saved $19.95 every year. Ergo, you turned down an offer that would've
> done exactly what you wanted (even more), just not immediately. Now will you
> shut up? I'm tired off showing you your stupidity...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92ce2f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> again.
> Do
> I
> new
> <<<<SNiP>>>>>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 6:00pm
I never said it was each year. However, I have to pay it at some point.
Whether I pay it now or when Active Worlds allows me to pay $60, using $20 I
already gave them for a world is the issue.
You seem to totally miss the boat here.
"In any event, I didn't want a renewal of something I didn't even use for a
month. That is rediculous. Do you renew your driver's license for the next
year 3 weeks after getting this years license?" - I think this sums it up
pretty well
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B93D06B.ED3F0EEE at yahoo.com...
> give it up filter him hes too stupid to get it hes
> even too stupid to reply in ONE message
> and marcus the 70 buck fee is a ONE TIME charge
> stop saying its 80 bucks a year
>
> kah wrote:
**hypothetical**
to
renew
would
would've
you
you'd
already.
they
the
what
a
what
that I
may
|
|