|
.duo. // User Search
.duo. // User Search
Jul 1, 2003, 12:13am
Yeah, but those constitutional rights are taken away on the internet by the
digital millenium act or whatever its called. Also, iggy is not neccesarily
a 'proud-american' but had family in the holocaust. I think thats plenty of
justification.
Vermin clearly used the word 'jew' as if it were a bad thing, and you know
it. However, I don't really think that vermin saying that hitler was half
jewish was bad at all, and in fact if anything was to make hitler look
stupid.
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3f008754 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Vermin committed no crime other than expressing his opinion. If you are
such an anti-fascist, proud American, then you might recall a teansie little
article in the Bill of Rights that allows American citizens to speak out
against the government without fear of federal persecution. Just because you
don't like to hear what he has to say doesn't mean that he doesn't have the
same rights and privileges that you do. If you want to silence him, then
you're not much better than Joseph Goebbels.
>
> That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not
necessarily apply in AW. According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing
wrong, though. There was no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you
were the sole opposition of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing,
and no insulting. Seeing that no one else apparently had a problem with
this, you should have muted him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid)
and gone along your merry way. If someone's opinions expressed over the
Internet can get to you that easily, then you seriously need to learn to
have faith in your own beliefs.
>
> iggythealleycat wrote:
Active
your
Guidelines
Guidelines
tabacco
revolution.
out
again?
click on
starts
some
you
:}
do u
ppl
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:17am
There, a good argument. The GK management may be the reason certain GKs are
bad (or have gone bad) and are still there, and that would be the cause.
However, I was just arguing that there are bad GKs, and plenty of them.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f006e66$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> .duo., Your about as wrong as I was when I first read this...:) I'd be
the first one to scream bloody murder on a bad GK...in fact I've about had
it with the GK Management......they leave the GK's out to dry way to many
times. and are actually the reason the organization is faltering...IMO.
I buck the system when it needs it.....but not at others expense. IMO Iggy
should have left the Gate when he did not like what Vermin was saying, not
sit there and make an issue out of it. Email is your friend and it's a
"paper trail" when you need it.
>
> Leo
>
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f006cb1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
which
and
is
heard.
racism
why
NOT
believe
not
look
the
of
your a
always
the
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:17am
I agree.
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3f00b27a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I stay away from the gate because I don't like places where I can only sit
&
> chat, other than that I don't mind it.
>
> ~John
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f00592f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Gate....stay away from there...you obviously do not need help with
AW...and
> your not there to help others...why do you go there?
> news:BB262FAB.8AA%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> friends
> could
their
> after
> them
> bud.
> when you
at
> all
> at the
a
> few
> Sorry to
don't
> like,
> kellie
> at the
for
> lives
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:19am
I agree with that statement 100%.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f0057eb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I agree with this assessment .Duo. Want to harass someone about the GK's?
Let AWI know how upset you are with the current Staff and give them NAMES.
If they see certain names being repeated in a bunch in Emails maybe they
will listen huh?
> There ARE bad apples in every bushel.....that for sure does not spoil the
whole bushel.....as long as you pick out the bad ones now and then......:)
Someone DOES need to sit around and watch them for performance.... I've seen
some pretty lame GK's that are great people but did not know first thing
about "helping" someone with a problem. It's a hard "job" to be
friendly...welcoming...supportive.... and still deal with
troublemakers.....and the bottom line is they VOLUNTEER for this...:)
>
> It's a neat "club" to be in......but they still need to have a channel for
getting rid of the bad apples a little faster. It's amazing how fast they
can get rid of a "helpful/knowledgeable" GK when they do not fit in
politically or personally with a fellow GK.....but then leave a "rotten
apple" on staff for years. and ignore there behavior/lack of service, only
cause they are well liked in the "club"....this crap has to go.
>
> My 2 cents
> Leo :)
>
> PS; I see a heck of a lot more cit's "Cross the line" than I ever do
with the GK's.
>
>
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f004fe4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
was
and
They
REALLY
be
better
like,
the
saying
of
gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:20am
No, but some GKs are really bad enough to eject people simply out of
dislike.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f005cd1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "doesn't like" or "doesn't like harassed by them"
> I have MY opinion on this already duh...:)
>
>
>
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB263463.8B7%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
GK's
IS FOR
of these
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:20am
Yeah.
[View Quote]"weizer" <guillaume.soucis at vl.videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:3f005b4c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Afaik, not only troublemakers/rude/crude people get ejected. Just look at
> the number of posts about it.
>
> -Weizer
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 3f005a20$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> FOR NEWBIES AND THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HELP THEM"..... If your not one
of
> these people then what are you doing there?. :)
> news:3f0052fa$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> gatekeepers
> call
> de
> like,
kellie
> the
> saying
lives
> of
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:42pm
I think that vermin was hinting at slander, saying 'Jew' as if it were a bad
thing. That is clearly against the conduct guidelines.
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3f01003d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> .duo. wrote:
>
the
neccesarily
of
>
> Read before you respond, please.
>
> "That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not
necessarily apply in AW."
>
> (Myself, in reference to the Bill of Rights). I then go on to say that I
think Vermin was not breaking the rules of discussion AWGate.
>
> "According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing wrong, though. There was
no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you were the sole opposition
of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing, and no insulting. Seeing
that no one else apparently had a problem with this, you should have muted
him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid) and gone along your merry
way."
>
know
half
>
> Unfortunately, since I wasn't there, I *don't* know it. All I can see is
that Vermin didn't seem to be bothering anybody but Iggy, which is why I
advised Iggy that he should have muted the fellow and gone along his way.
The GK isn't going to eject someone just because *one* person has a problem
with him and he doesn't seem to be breaking any (official, as opposed to
GK-on-the-spot) rules.
>
> To rephrase: if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:44pm
That law is what ALLOWS aw and other internet entities to be exempt from
many laws.
Sorry for the one liners, heh heh heh.
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3f01003d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> .duo. wrote:
>
the
neccesarily
of
>
> Read before you respond, please.
>
> "That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not
necessarily apply in AW."
>
> (Myself, in reference to the Bill of Rights). I then go on to say that I
think Vermin was not breaking the rules of discussion AWGate.
>
> "According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing wrong, though. There was
no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you were the sole opposition
of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing, and no insulting. Seeing
that no one else apparently had a problem with this, you should have muted
him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid) and gone along your merry
way."
>
know
half
>
> Unfortunately, since I wasn't there, I *don't* know it. All I can see is
that Vermin didn't seem to be bothering anybody but Iggy, which is why I
advised Iggy that he should have muted the fellow and gone along his way.
The GK isn't going to eject someone just because *one* person has a problem
with him and he doesn't seem to be breaking any (official, as opposed to
GK-on-the-spot) rules.
>
> To rephrase: if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:56pm
I would say that 5-10 lousy GKs or even possibly more is plenty.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f01826d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> not sure on the "plenty of them" but I would tend to agree.
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f00ef1d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
are
I'd be
had
many
Iggy
not
That's
debates,
chat,
ignored
be
so
she) is
nor
lurk.....but
not
muted
charge
also..:)
think
to
with
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 11:00pm
lol, I would love it :-P
[View Quote]"weizer" <guillaume.soucis at vl.videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:3f00597d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> But personally I wouldn't apply for that kind of job lol.
>
> -Weizer
> "weizer" <guillaume.soucis at vl.videotron.ca> a écrit dans le message de
news:
> 3f00591d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
logs
> as
news:
> GK's?
NAMES.
they
> the
then......:)
> seen
thing
> for
they
only
> silly
I
GZ
good.
and
> would
> not
> kellie
at
> lives
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 11:01pm
No, I would never do that. In my world I don't really eject for anything at
all as long as no one is bothered by it. I would make a terrible GK, but I
sure wouldn't eject for no reason.
I prefer not to list the names on the newsgroup.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f0184af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> As you yourself would do to those GK's So what is it? A Personal
conflict? So leave the GK's as a group out of this and instead lets name
some names.....I'm all for cleaning things up....but it's NOT the GK's as a
group...... it's a personal thing...some of them do have to go.
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f00efe9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
GATE
one
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:25am
Me :-P because those posts drive me nuts.
[View Quote]"captain mad mike" <cmm at nospam.swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3f00dc19$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And then who continues arguing with them?
>
> -CMM
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:BB26AA5B.A31%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
baronjutter at shaw.ca
ridiculously
between
> two
everyone.
> If
> error in
to
> no
> post.
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:38pm
lol, yeah :-P
[View Quote]"weizer" <weizer at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3f00f157$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yes I saw that, you reply 100posts/sec...lol
>
> -Weizer
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 3f00f105$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
technical
> matters
arguments"
>
>
|
Jul 5, 2003, 12:28pm
Yeah me too. The only reason I ever became a cit was because I explored all
the worlds and ended up liking them a lot. If I was a tourist now, I would
never become a cit.
Ok this is all assumptions and stuff, but here goes:
I own a p-20 5 user world. I'm not an adult and don't have any kind of job
(besides tutoring), and my parents don't spoil me so the chances of me
getting any large amount of money from them is very small. I personally
don't want to pay for a world if I have to scrounge money to keep it up. I
own a p-20 5 user, which I pay $40 a year for. As I said before, I don't
want to have to use a large amount of effort to keep my world up. Why would
I pay $100 a year for a p-20 5 user world with tourist access when I can pay
$90 a year for a p-30 5 user or p-20 10 user, have more possibilities for my
world, and have to use LESS effort to keep my world up? What's tourist
access when you have a 5 user limit anyway? If tourist access was cheaper,
then owners of small worlds (like me) might actually pay for it. It would
also be more profitable for AW. Lets say, 400-500 world owners (there are
generally 1100 active worlds) payed $30 for tourist access ($12,000-$15,000)
instead of 110 world owners paying $60 for tourist access ($6,600) AW would
make twice as much money off of tourist access. Not that you can be sure
400-500 world owners would buy the $30 tourist access. They could break even
(220 world owners paying). Even if it was only $20 (and they had 400-500
people registering) they would still make $8,000-$10,000, which is more than
$6,600. Not to mention the extra income brought in by more tourists becoming
citizens (more worlds to experience, more bad experiences in build deletion
etc., more appeal because of nice worlds open to tourists, etc.). Pretty
much any way it would happen, AW would not only make more money, but the
universe would be more appealing, more enjoyable, cheaper to use, and more.
AW won't last unless they make more money somehow. This is probably very,
very far off, but here is what their income could be. Lets say there are
only 300 cits. Thats $24,000 a year. Then $6,600 from tourist access. Thats
$30,600 a year. Then the income from worlds, $81,930 (assuming 500 worlds
are p-10 5 user, 100 are p-20 5 user, 10 are p-80 10 user, 50 are p-50 30
user, 3 are p-100 100 user, 100 are p-20 10 user, 200 are p-10 10 user, 100
p-30 5 user, 37 are p-30 10 user, and there are 1000 worlds total (and there
are definately many more)). That's $112,530 a year. Not to mention little
cit upgrades (bot limits) and other ways they make money (bingo bot renting,
etc.). Assuming there are 50 legal universes, and the average price is
$34,375, AW gets $1,718,750 from universes. That's $1,831,280. Then lets
assume there are 20 legal galaxys that cost on average $5,800. That's an
additional $116,000, making the yearly income $1,947,280. Assuming they host
200 worlds ($200 each), 5 galaxys ($400 each), and 15 universes ($900 each)
they make $55,500 off of hosting. That's $2,002,780. Asumming they host 200
FTP places at an average price of $509, they make $101,800 off of that. That
brings the total to $2,104,580. Advertising is $500 a month, assuming they
have 10 people advertising the entire year, they make $60,000 off of that,
bringing the total to $2,164,580. I could go on a long time, but lets end it
here. That's probably a horrible understatement or overstatement, but oh
well. If their employees cost them $1,600,000 and they have $200,000 in
other costs and... well you get the picture of my random estimation.
[View Quote]"weizer" <weizer at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3f05cd87 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I strongly agree.
>
> -Weizer
>
> "spectrum 65" <ska__ at hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 3f05aded$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
citizen.
> citizen
bad
> unless
even
> and
> have
> the
the
> not
big
if
> owners
> and
a
> part
them?
> tourists
> money
my
> do
be
as
her
will
>
>
|
Jul 5, 2003, 10:50am
No, I think its actually the number of characters, but oh well.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f069482$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> tony m wrote:
>
> Mmm, cell space is taken up by total vertices of an object. The larger
> the vertices, the faster the space is taken. As far as I'm aware, you
> can load at _least_ one object no matter the size.
>
> Origin is just to determine which cell it belongs too. Ever had 3/4 of
> an object in a cell but that last 1/4 was in the other, and that's which
> cell it "belonged" too? It could use a little revamping, like using the
> vertices in the cell and not the object in the cell's vertices. Cell
> space shouldn't be taken up by description/action/model-name either --
> having that occur that makes no sense to me. Trying to save memory?
> Maybe if it were 1998 still.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jul 6, 2003, 4:05pm
Nope, I think any general statement without proof is bull pucky.
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message
news:3f076169 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol, barely any men would tolerate being hit on! but we are all shallow
and
> proud! :) anyone else with me?
>
> -SWE
>
> "alaskanshadow" <monkeysarepretty at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3f075c78 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
matt,
> typing
feminine
>
>
|
Jul 6, 2003, 3:37pm
Lamers are in every online game. I'm not surprised at all.
[View Quote]"m0e" <m0e at sbgraphics.info> wrote in message
news:3f0833af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> should read ....
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/fun.games/07/05/misbehaving.online.ap/
>
> alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/fun.games/07/05/misbehaving.online.ap/index.ht
m
>
|
Jul 6, 2003, 3:59pm
This is just what he means. Your all heartless jerks. Read your own posts,
I'm sure you wouldn't like any of that said to you. It's people like you
guys who scare cits and tourists away. Anyway, I see why he would want
appreciation for doing stuff for the community. I forget what else I was
going to say, heh heh heh.
[View Quote]"light form" <Light_Form at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f0823b5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Herked on fonics werked fur me!" But spelling ignorance is truely bliss.
>
> LF
>
>
>
>
|
Jul 6, 2003, 4:00pm
No, but people do show their appreciation to them.
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message
news:3f082afa at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol, your looking to be appreciated?
> you think hamfom,xelag,ananas,andras, etc. have a fan site? no, im
guessing
> they're doing it for the sake of helping people, not to be appreciated....
>
> -SWE
>
> "r i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:3f07b479 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jul 12, 2003, 3:07pm
:-P don't mean to be a jerk, but I'd rather not tell you where I live, heh
heh heh. Near Boston though.
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabitphalpha at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3f0d7ce8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Howdy ya'll:)
>
> Yes...that's my AlphaBit in Texas greeting...lol
> Ok...here's the story.
> King Tex and I will be taking a train trip up to Boston (see itinary
> below) and will have a couple of 3-5 hour layovers in a couple cities.
> I'm not sure where everyone lives, but would love to have the
> opportunity to meet some of you, even if only for a few hours.
> Also, Amtrak has a bit of history for not being right on time, so
people
> would have to call the station to assure the exact arrival.
> It looks like the major layover cities are Chicago, New York-Penn.
> Station, and Washington-Union Station.
> This is tentative to us picking the tickets up today. Plus I will get
an
> exact time schedule should they have additional cities with any layovers.
> If you are interested in meeting us, let's chat via email or here or I
> can call you.
> If you aren't interested in meeting us, well then....ummm...you don't
> know what your missing?...lol...j/k:)
> Here's the itenary;
>
> Train #22
> Departs Austin 07/25/03 10:31am
> Arrives Chicago 07/26/03 2:25pm Reserved Coach
>
> Train #48
> Departs Chicago 07/26/03 7:00pm
> Arrives New York-Penn. Station, NEW YORK (NYP) 07/27/03 1:50pm
>
> Train #194
> Departs New York-Penn. Station, NEW YORK (NYP) 07/27/03 5:00pm
> Arrives Boston-Route 128, MASSACHUSETTS (RTE) 07/27/03 8:50pm
>
>
> Return
> Train #195
> Departs Boston-Route 128 08/17/03 6:45am
> Arrives Washington-Union Station 08/17/03 2:30pm Reserved Coach
>
> Train #29
> Departs Washington-Union Station 08/17/03 5:20pm
> Arrives Chicago 10:53am 08/18/03
>
> Train #21
> Departs Chicago 08/18/03 3:20pm
> Arrives Austin 08/19/03 8:20pm
>
> Hey Andras....if you're in the states while we are in Boston, we would
love
> to meet up with you again:)
> And DMC2U....we will definately be seeing you for that hug you so
> desperately keep requesting *wink*.
>
> Bit:)
>
>
>
|
Jul 12, 2003, 3:10pm
Heh heh heh, and I live in Cambridge, right next to Boston, woo!
[View Quote]"themask" <uh at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3f0e28bb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Bah.. I'm all the way down here in New Bedford near the cape :( ( In MA
> ofcourse heh )
>
>
|
Jul 12, 2003, 3:18pm
http://www.awcommunity.org/awec/awec_events/festival2003/About.htm
[View Quote]"starfleet" <Starfleet at Command.com> wrote in message
news:3f102fbf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It's only between 12-7 and 14-7.
>
> "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:3f101f58 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
hope
back
>
>
|
Jul 15, 2003, 9:46am
Dangit, I want those kind of object making skills, lol.
[View Quote]"imagine" <imagines at joimail.com> wrote in message
news:3f107b40 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have recently begun to make wicker objects. My first wicker objects are
on
> my objects page at http://www.geocities.com/nawehcrafts/index.html
>
> Take a quick look :) Follow the links to the page with the wicker.
>
> I am planning to make sets. Like, bedroom and dinning room sets, and even
> more ods and ends than are on the page now. I will also considering doing
> custom wicker objects or sets. To find out more about that email me at
> imagines at joimail.com or tele me when you see me in AW :)
>
> Keep checking back to my objects page for more wicker. I hope to have more
> on there by the end of next week :)
>
> Thanks
>
> Imagine
>
>
|
Jul 15, 2003, 9:47am
BTW< I don't mean to be picky or something, but browsing your site would be
easier if it had some kind of menu somewhere.
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f13e995$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Dangit, I want those kind of object making skills, lol.
> "imagine" <imagines at joimail.com> wrote in message
> news:3f107b40 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
are
> on
even
doing
more
>
>
|
Jul 16, 2003, 10:44pm
Lol, I was thinking of using a php script to get oct31.de/objs, your OP, and
my own. That would screw things up a lot, heh heh heh.
[View Quote]"themask" <admin at themask.3dhost.net> wrote in message
news:3f14540a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Wooo! What a speech.. and i was planning on using a PHP Script myself..
but
> i dont, and have my objects all ina folder. Though i have cut some bugs,
but
> im not even there yet, so i might just startover my path since i dont like
> it as/themask sounds corny and stuff.. heh
>
>
|
Jul 21, 2003, 8:13am
Remember though, sometimesworld owners will have the world on 'hide chat'
and will repeat the chat through a bot. This basically disables whispers.
[View Quote]"xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
news:87amhv8biil6mhvl5sv63c9qs7pfl21kf3 at 4ax.com...
> To explain this a bit more. Since 1998/1999, when bots were created,
> they have the ability to receive chat, and to receive whispers
> adressed to them (and only those ones addressed to them), and receive
> all other AW events. This is because they use the AW SDK. But bots
> don't only use the AW SDK, they have their own code to handle what
> they do with this. It depends on the bot maker what sort of code they
> add (and they MUST add code, otherwise bots would do nothing). They
> could be adding code to send the owner's password to someone, or the
> whole chat to the CIA...
>
> First rule: use bots from trusted makers.
>
> Second rule: NEVER expect that people or bots will do what you want.
> You have, in your own world, the right to select which people and
> which bots you allow in. You do NOT have that right in other worlds.
>
> Whispers seem safe to me. World servers do not log them, and they do
> not go thru the universe server. Telegrams are dangerous: the
> universe server has an option to LOG ALL TELEGRAMS. Chat is open to
> everone: it can be privately logged, sent world wide , published on
> CNN, there is no way to control that.
>
> I'm not trying to put you off, I'm just trying to show you our limits.
>
> Alex
> XelaG - bot maker
>
> On 20 Jul 2003 19:41:36 -0400, "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote:
>
visitors
welcome
on
throughout
are
visiting
>
|
Jul 21, 2003, 7:57pm
lol, I got it O_O Thanks for the info :-P Where'd you get those skills :-P
[View Quote]"themask" <admin at themask.3dhost.net> wrote in message
news:3f1c47c7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This file was used for attacks in the AW universe, from a source of mine,
> alerted me, and told me i was on their 'list' to attack. Everyone who got
> that tgram or opened the url, change your ppw and pw as quickly as your
> can.. right now they are doing the attacks. My source tells me the world
> they are doing it from are 'mailoto'. And if anyone who thinks there
'uber',
> your not anymore. Don't screw with me, n00bs.
>
>
|
Jul 21, 2003, 7:27pm
What are the names of the registry entries?
[View Quote]"chrispeg" <chrispeg at gmx.net> wrote in message
news:3f1c3439 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you get a telegram like this:
>
> "Telegram from someone's name, sent Mo Jul 21, 2003 06:41:
> My friend has made a cool little program for AW and it would mean a lot to
> me if you helped him out and downloaded it and told me and him what you
> think: www . twisted-inc . com / awtoolkit . exe "
> (URL without blanks).
>
> do NOT download and run the program.
>
>
> How it installs on your system:
>
> awtoolkit.exe immidiatly renames to c:\%win_root%\msagent\mslxlu.exe. It
> creates at least 3 registry entries, which call the program whenever you
> logon to windows and/or you start IE. Once mslxlu.exe it copies itself to
> c:\%win_root%\system32\msrksd.com, which is also called when you logon to
> windows or start IE. A third copy is made and copied to
> c:\%win_root%\win32cmds.exe. Using your taskmanager (win2k/XP) will show
you
> this process once its running.
>
> All instances are UPX compressed files. Norton does NOT recognize the
> trojan!
>
>
> What it does:
>
> 1) It runs an IRC server on port 6666
> 2) It connects to ICQ using remote port 80
> 3) It tries to connect to hotmail.com to send off an email, using remote
> port 25
>
> I did not analyse the data it would try to send, though, as in- and
outgoing
> connections were blocked when I analysed it. It looks like the trojan is
> even able to capture your screen.
>
> In case one of you already got infected, please contact ActiveWorlds for
> removal instructions.
>
>
>
|
Jul 21, 2003, 7:32pm
BTW, will deleting all of the files get rid of it sufficiently, or shoudl I
delete the registry entries too?
[View Quote]"chrispeg" <chrispeg at gmx.net> wrote in message
news:3f1c3439 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you get a telegram like this:
>
> "Telegram from someone's name, sent Mo Jul 21, 2003 06:41:
> My friend has made a cool little program for AW and it would mean a lot to
> me if you helped him out and downloaded it and told me and him what you
> think: www . twisted-inc . com / awtoolkit . exe "
> (URL without blanks).
>
> do NOT download and run the program.
>
>
> How it installs on your system:
>
> awtoolkit.exe immidiatly renames to c:\%win_root%\msagent\mslxlu.exe. It
> creates at least 3 registry entries, which call the program whenever you
> logon to windows and/or you start IE. Once mslxlu.exe it copies itself to
> c:\%win_root%\system32\msrksd.com, which is also called when you logon to
> windows or start IE. A third copy is made and copied to
> c:\%win_root%\win32cmds.exe. Using your taskmanager (win2k/XP) will show
you
> this process once its running.
>
> All instances are UPX compressed files. Norton does NOT recognize the
> trojan!
>
>
> What it does:
>
> 1) It runs an IRC server on port 6666
> 2) It connects to ICQ using remote port 80
> 3) It tries to connect to hotmail.com to send off an email, using remote
> port 25
>
> I did not analyse the data it would try to send, though, as in- and
outgoing
> connections were blocked when I analysed it. It looks like the trojan is
> even able to capture your screen.
>
> In case one of you already got infected, please contact ActiveWorlds for
> removal instructions.
>
>
>
|
Jul 21, 2003, 7:42pm
You just delete all the files and registry entries, right?
[View Quote]"themask" <admin at themask.3dhost.net> wrote in message
news:3f1c4fc1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Eh, and you think AW would know? I'd rather see what Norton gets.
>
>
|
|