|
|
john // User Search
john // User Search
Feb 2, 2003, 11:02am
It wouldnt be TOO hard to implement.
[View Quote]"sk8man1" <someone at someone.net> wrote in message
news:3e3d0a0b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yeah, that would be awesome. The only way now seems to be like just a
> bot or something which takes more scripting and time than that would...
>
>
>
> "john" <johnf_the_great at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3e3d01ee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
ok
> it
> for
> there
> stations
>
>
|
Feb 3, 2003, 7:23pm
I have.
Several times. A fully functional bot scripting language and a simple D++
compiler.
Complete with if and split functions.
[View Quote]"agent1" <agent1 at shatteredplatters.com.nospam> wrote in message
news:3e3d3dea$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Have you ever written a scripting language? Then don't assume you know how
hard it is.
>
> -Agent1
>
> john wrote:
>
|
Feb 6, 2003, 7:46pm
WILL EVERYBODY SHUT UP WITH YOUR STUPID LITTLE ARGUMENTS ABOUT PEOPLE DYING
AND THAT "WHY SHOULD WE BUILD A MEMORIAL FOR 7 PEOPLE" AND WARS AND STUFF.
WHY DO YOU ALL NEED TO ARGUE? WHAT IS IT... THE PEOPLE WHO ARE WILLING/ABLE
TO PAY FOR CITS STILL ARE A LOAD OF ARGUING, IRRITATING MORONS?
Feb 6, 2003, 8:13pm
*SORRY* but everybody everywhere is arguing!
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <CarLBanks at insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3e42dd49$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Will you not cross post?
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3e42d7ba at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> DYING
STUFF.
> WILLING/ABLE
>
>
|
Feb 7, 2003, 9:07am
I posted this because I didn;t realise that the newsgroups were designed for
fighting and arguing.
I thought they might be to discuss aw and maybe help people with questions
and queries. And I also thought it was a place to post information and not
somewhere where every bit of information posted is contradicted or put down.
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3e42d7ba at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> WILL EVERYBODY SHUT UP WITH YOUR STUPID LITTLE ARGUMENTS ABOUT PEOPLE
DYING
> AND THAT "WHY SHOULD WE BUILD A MEMORIAL FOR 7 PEOPLE" AND WARS AND STUFF.
>
> WHY DO YOU ALL NEED TO ARGUE? WHAT IS IT... THE PEOPLE WHO ARE
WILLING/ABLE
> TO PAY FOR CITS STILL ARE A LOAD OF ARGUING, IRRITATING MORONS?
>
>
|
Feb 8, 2003, 8:48pm
I think he might mean that they should introduce a seed ability to browser..
hehe
[View Quote]"coryashire" <Coryashire at att.net> wrote in message
news:3e4575e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i think that they should introduce a function in the bot to seed a object.
> this way we dont have to use bots.
>
> coryashire
>
>
>
|
Feb 10, 2003, 8:54pm
Ever thought of sticking to something related to his idea?
Save you lot making smart-arse remarks.
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet:com> wrote in message
news:3e482b2d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What makes it really annoying (to me) is that its not even one of the
stupid
> wishlist items that get posted here. Its short, simple, and makes sense as
a
> wish for AW and yet three people have chosen to jump on a single
mis-placed
> word.
>
> This world is a fecking mess, it really is.
>
> Grims
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
> news:3e4826d5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I
>
>
|
Feb 11, 2003, 3:25pm
Sorry - replied 2 1 of ur earlier posts.
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet:com> wrote in message
news:3e48b386 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Do you read? Can you understand acknowledgement if you can read it? One of
> these two answers is "No".
>
> Hint: "Its short, simple, and makes sense as a wish for AW"
>
> Grims
>
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3e482d9c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Feb 12, 2003, 6:40pm
Worlds you DONT own?
[View Quote]"agent1" <agent1 at shatteredplatters.com.nospam> wrote in message
news:3e4a945e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Embedded"
>
>
> d a n wrote:
simular
>
> "similar"
>
>
> What's wrong with using the World Welcome Message?
>
> -Agent1
>
|
Feb 13, 2003, 2:58pm
Non-Encroachment is currently on the server anyway:
if you make the browser think you're a diff cit than you are by editing the
memory and build over that cits land, it doesn't allow u.
[View Quote]"sk8man1" <someone at someone.net> wrote in message
news:3e4ae1e4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I would like the ability to allow some people to encroach -_- It would
> be on the registry/world server level so that no-one can just use a hack
or
> something.
>
> -Sk8man1
>
>
|
Feb 15, 2003, 7:21pm
Carl:
We are talking about with registry. It would involve a new right...
designated "non-registry" areas or areas for designated people to build on
together would be good.
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <CarLBanks at insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3e4e914c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well without a registry you can.
>
> "sk8man1" <someone at someone.net> wrote in message
> news:3e4e8de7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
posts...
>
>
|
Mar 2, 2003, 7:57am
on a similar subject:
what if you could send a tgram like this:
if r:y then make the other user's aw send a gram back when received (of
course they would need a bit so it didn't go round SHow status).
R:Y
Hello....blahblah.
if its just:
Hello.....blahblah.
then its the same as R:N.
This would be excellent, email has it!
[View Quote]"pineriver" <pineriver at thenett.com> wrote in message
news:3e53ac73 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yes that would be a good feature
>
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:3e52eccf$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
persons
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2003, 4:31pm
Isn't that AW_OBJECT_CHANGE?
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet:com> wrote in message
news:3e54b16b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Its been a while since I put a new wish in here, so I thought I'd drag up
an
> old one. We have a new version of AW on the horizon, with a few changes to
> the SDK - some of which are useful, some of which are necessary to support
> the new browser functionality (i.e. approximately 1 million new world
> attributes), but nothing on the scale of the "Object click events now
> include the Object X, Y, Z, Description, etc....." revelation.
>
> One item that contiunues to raise its head from developers is the rather
> lacking "AW_EVENT_OBJECT_DELETE" event attributes, currently residing in
the
> "it would be so much more useful if" category for most developers. The
wish
> is, of course, that the object attributes be included in the event like
the
> "Click" event now has ... so that a deleted object can be restored should
> this be necessary without the need to query the cell in case someone does
> delete it.
>
> I'm not trying to second guess any reasons its not been addressed
previously
> (like at the same time as the click event got the benefit of these useful
> attributes) or the difficulty associated in implementing it. I would like
to
> know, though, whether this one item pencilled in for a future realease, or
> whether its technically a big issue because of legacy code.
>
> This request gets brought up a lot by SDK users, so a timely appearance
> would be welcome. I was disappointed to see that it wasn't included in
build
> 29 as it gives world management bots the power they need to rectify
"issues"
> with deletions. While I'm here ... if possible, identifying the object
> number/cell of the deleted object in the AW_EVENT_OBJECT_ADD event (for an
> object- move) would also make a lot of people's lifes much much easier.
>
> Ta,
>
> Grims.
>
>
|
Feb 25, 2003, 3:03pm
I think AW should have fog areas...although Mr Brain informed me that atcual
fog in an area all the time is impossible I suggested this:
Have it so as you get closer to the area, the fog slowly builds up... it
would RULE!
Feb 27, 2003, 8:22pm
All the world server would need to do is forward this click to the browsers
as if the user of that browser had clicked it.
[View Quote]"equin0x" <equin0x at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3e5d6b9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I am on a roll with the new features today, anyhoo, here we go...
>
> A feature to allow others to see objects move when clicked on, such as
when
> opening a door, I would like all to see that I opened the door and walked
> in, not just them seeing me walk through a closed door.
>
>
|
Feb 28, 2003, 8:39pm
You could add a simple boolean check to see if its a passed on.
I am also saying for "activate=shared visible a off"
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3e5ead1d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Actually, that's probably something that you wouldn't want it to do...
first, because if the browser can't distinguish between a real click and a
passed on click, it could send the forwarded click back to the world server,
causing an endless loop. Second, because not all clicks on objects by one
person do things that other people would want to also have done on their
end. For example, if I click an object with an Activate URL command on it,
you may not want your web browser to open the associated web page.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3e5e8fb3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
browsers
walked
>
>
|
Mar 2, 2003, 7:52am
Why not:
Are you sure you wish to delete this object?
Are you sure you wish to delete these 5 objects?
Are you sure you want to make that change?
Are you sure you want to make that change to these 5 objects?
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3e61d1dd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The objects are stored locally durring the time you have them selected.
Perhaps when a person does a delete, the selected objects could be placed in
local temporary storage, to make an undelete possible. Perhaps, a Build
Menu could be added to the main AW menu bar, with Edit, Move and Rotate
flyouts, to replace those menus in the Object Properties dialog box, and
allow access to Undo while no objects are selected.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3E61A991.660F8B2A at oct31.de...
had one
>
>
|
Mar 2, 2003, 7:53am
Of course not if you're flat out building. Otherwise it could cause
problems.
Maybe a way to turn it on/off
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3e61d1dd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The objects are stored locally durring the time you have them selected.
Perhaps when a person does a delete, the selected objects could be placed in
local temporary storage, to make an undelete possible. Perhaps, a Build
Menu could be added to the main AW menu bar, with Edit, Move and Rotate
flyouts, to replace those menus in the Object Properties dialog box, and
allow access to Undo while no objects are selected.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3E61A991.660F8B2A at oct31.de...
had one
>
>
|
Mar 8, 2003, 10:02pm
Du er ikke dum!
:-D
Takk, Takk.
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3E6A57F9.3152636C at oct31.de...
> Spellcheckers are for people who cannot write properly.
>
> Otoh. I would be interested to know what a Norwegian spell
> checker would do to an English text ...
>
>
> d a n wrote:
|
Mar 15, 2003, 10:45pm
Make it optional!
Once aw kept disconnecting me in all modes except opengl & software
renderer!
[View Quote]"dlp anne" <anne at dreamlandpark.com> wrote in message
news:3e70e10d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> To help users config the active worlds browser to run good on there
> computer.
> Can it be made to do on 1st run a video test on each video mode then
telling
> you what mode your computer will run best on.
> You can still pick what ever one you want, but this test will tell you
know
> what one will work best for you.
> Many 3D video games do this.
>
>
|
Mar 17, 2003, 7:21pm
DLP Anne.... I think you misunderstood
If aw tests each video mode to see which works best there could be a problem
if aw disconnects people each time on certain video modes.
[View Quote]"dlp anne" <anne at dreamlandpark.com> wrote in message
news:3e761ff7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why make it optional there is no reason for it to be that way.
> This will only pop up once at 1st run, the user still has full control
over
> what they want to use, it just tells you what will be best, its up to the
> user to agree or not and pick what ever they want.
>
> This test will stop all the users from complaining saying this world lags
me
> or this area lags me.
> Most lag is either caused by using the wrong video mode, using a PC that
> don't meat the recommended requirements, or being around objects with a
high
> poly/vert count.
>
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3e73c90d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Mar 20, 2003, 12:59pm
I dont mean disconnect the citizenship... I mean the computers modem.
[View Quote]"dlp anne" <anne at dreamlandpark.com> wrote in message
news:3e76ae89 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Your not seeing what I am talking about.
> It wont disconnect anyone at all.
> To run this test it wont even let you log in yet.
> This test will run just before it lets you log in and only on the first
run
> not each log in.
> It will then tell you what video mode it recommends you use and still list
> the others, it's still up to the user what mode they choose at this point
> agree with the recommended and use it or choose another.
> After they choose it will then let the user log in.
> One game off the top of my head that has this type of video test is Diablo
2
> if you have that game, if not download the demo and check out its video
test
> you will then see what I am talking about.
> The demo of that game can be found here.
> http://www.blizzard.com/diablo2/demo.shtml
>
>
>
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3e763c58 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> problem
> the
> lags
that
a
there
then
> you
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2003, 5:04pm
Know what'd be easy?
Just have a hole in the wall where the mirror is, with a room exactly the
same but opposite on the other side. Simple!
Lol
[View Quote]"jacob the hero" <warejacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e74c2e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Include: Sign! the Letter Backward and Fordward
> "joeman" <joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3e74a793$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> on
getting
> texture
diffrent
and
> up
textures
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2003, 8:12pm
What about 3.4?
[View Quote]"calhoun" <coen at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3e87d474$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yeah.. except bots cant go upside down without making custom seqs or
avatars
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3e8769c9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
out
in
> Reflect?
place
by
> mirror"
> close
up
search
> to
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2003, 8:43pm
What are the most requested additions to aw?
Mar 17, 2003, 8:17am
I mean IDEAs....techy or not.
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3e75111e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That depends on how you define most requested.
>
> Some people tell each other what they want. Some tell only someone they
expect to have a good technical understanding of it. Some are afraid to
tell someone who they think will look at it in a technical way because they
don't feel qualified to discuss it on that level. Some write in letters to
a specific employee of the company or a specific department. Some post
their ideas here in the wishlist newsgroup. Some use a combination of many
different ways to get their point across. Some people confide in the same
person every time, if they even tell anyone at all, and other people message
everyone they can think of about it. Some are calm and quite about it while
others are loud and persistant. Some people find that using as few words as
possible is their preffered style, and others like to go into excessive
detail. (That one would be me, by the way.) So while I can tell you many
frequently requested additions, I don't think anyone is really fully
qualified to say which are the "most" requested features unless you mean
specifically which ones they personally have heard requested most often or
by the most people.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3e74fe22 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Mar 17, 2003, 2:28pm
anthing pplz wud like a lot.. happy
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3e75a654$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> But what specifically do you mean by "most requested"?
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3e75a0b9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
they
they
to
many
same
message
while
words as
many
or
>
>
|
Mar 17, 2003, 7:17pm
Thanks Enzo
J
:-D
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3e75f9fb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> http://www.activeworlds.com/FeatureVote/
>
>
> E
>
>
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3e75f7a1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
someone
afraid
> to
because
> letters
> post
of
it
> excessive
> mean
> often
>
>
|
Mar 28, 2003, 3:06pm
I think rights should have a checkbox next to them: "Allow use by users
using PPWs" or "AUBP" (Allow use by privilege)
Like enter.. heh!
Mar 29, 2003, 10:06pm
Anybody got any ideas?
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3e8480fb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I think rights should have a checkbox next to them: "Allow use by users
> using PPWs" or "AUBP" (Allow use by privilege)
>
> Like enter.. heh!
>
>
|
|
