|
|
binarybud // User Search
binarybud // User Search
Sep 11, 2002, 10:05pm
bullshit ....Nornny should be the only one to trust and IMHO it's fixed
.....as fixed as Nornny wants it to be..... this whole freak'in game is
Nornny....
I can't trust him ....so I no deal with people I do not trust. game or no
game.
Up to this point I'd agree with ya. But now....
Why the hell would ANYONE want to play ANY game when people are cheating?
It's one thing for us to cheat amongst ourselves (the players) ....but when
the Person in charge is cheating....or letting cheating go on...Especially
on the CHALLENGES.......then it's not worth the hassle it's fixed..... I
was enjoying myself in this up to now..... but now I have no reason to
stick around it's polluted. For heaven sakes he let a person just voted
out cheat against the tribe hehehehe If i'm the only one pissed at this
crap then I guess I don't even belong here huh? Sorry if I come from an
OLD set of values. that's just me.
Leo :( aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"syntax" <syn at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3d7fd469 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hehe, NG Survivor here is almost exaclty like how the 1st and 2nd seasons
> went in the real show. The first season, everyone was kinda new to the
> game.. No one really knew what to do except a few. Second season comes
> along. Everyone is trying to play reeaaalll nice except one or two other
> players. There must be physics behind it.. ;-P
>
> Anyway you guys, stop complaining! It's only a game. Ol' Wing forged the
> hell outta his challenges in the 1st season and you could totally tell
also.
> Everyone was mad as hell at him so he got voted out. ;-P
>
> Take your aggression to the playing field instead of giving up and
quitting.
> And quit picking on ol' Nornny guys! He's the one that's spending the
most
> time typing out everything and maintaining the website so you guys can
have
> an enjoyable game.
> --
> - Syntax -
> http://www.swcity.net
> http://forum.swcity.net
>
> *[snip]'s*
>
>
|
Sep 12, 2002, 1:02am
You absolutely cheated..... look at the damn font it's not even the same
font dude.( check especially the digit '5') and the shadow is not white like
yours is it's light gray.....I wasn't born yesterday. Just come clean and
fess up.
You won't even tell us what name is yours on the high score list....why
would you get a high score and not post your name?
Leo :(
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:3d7ff343$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> how and why are you so sure I cheated?
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
> itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." -Mathew 5-34
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3d7fda3b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
fixed
> no
cheating?
> when
on...Especially
> I
> voted
this
an
> seasons
the
> other
> the
>
>
|
Sep 12, 2002, 1:08am
yea i'm out it's an obvious fake and your sticking up for it..... look
at it closely..... wrong font, wrong shadow, and fluff all around the
numbers....fake fake fake. if yer gonna fake it, do it right.
Leo :(
[View Quote]"nornny11" <Nornny1 at attbi.com> wrote in message
news:3d7ff0df at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is all I got from JerMe, and to me, it looks credible. I don't have
> much eyes for anything. lol.
>
> Anywho, for those who think I'm fixing the game, I'm not. :)) You only
have
> my word, at the moment, but trust me, the rules I've put into place so far
> were created, in my top secret Word document, long before the first
survivor
> even signed up to play. ;) In it, I have my challenges, the tribal council
> procedures, the week of the switch, everything. :) With only a few minor
> adjustments (moving challenges around, that's all), everything else has
been
> pre-planned. I would never fix a challenge for or against a tribe or
> someone, the "events" you're experiencing have happened on your own
tuition.
> It's not only bad for my rep, it's bad for Survivors in general. I can't
say
> that I've overlooked a few flaws that y'all have taken advantage of, but
the
> Survivor clause makes up for my blunders, which is "Anything goes." lol.
>
> But yeah, it's an intense game, and not everyone is up for it. I should
> know, I was host AND contestant on the first season, and got voted off.
But
> when you're playing for a world, I gotta turn up the heat a little. I've
> made you guys look like total newbies, jerks, and swindlers from Week 1,
you
> guys know this. :) I have nothing but GREAT respect and love for all you
> all, but I'll be first to tear up anything you say inworld or through
> tgrams. lol. I'm not partial towards anyone in my posts.
>
> You're right though, there are no rules. Just three, "Outwit, Outflame,
> Outlast." It'd be impossible to moderate this game any more without
breaking
> the true spirit of Survivor.
>
> However, if you do choose to resign from the game, maki and Gamecube are
> safe this week, and I'll continue onto Week 9. :) Just reply to this post,
> BB, and I'll take you out. If it's not fun, you shouldn't be playing it,
I'm
> not one for making this a burden on people's lives. lol. But I don't
> encourage anyone from just running away, you guys provide great
> entertainment. If anything, just get voted off. :) You've worked so hard
so
> far, and to leave over a teeshirt would be disappointing. But I can't
force
> anything. Just realize this is a community game, and you might think it's
> unfair that the community plays a part in something they barely experience
> compared to you guys, but they play a MUCH smaller part in the game than
the
> past season.
>
>
> --
> From the Newbie's Guide to the AW NG:
>
> "Nornny11 - The original wishy-washy man, this one can actually insult
you
> and compliment you in the same breath, and in the end say absolutely
> nothing! What a talent!"
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3d7f4432$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hours and
> hell
pffffft
> flame
> never
> what
still
> be
score
> I
Norn
> ( I
> about
> high
impressive
save
> it,
> last
> this
> not
casted
> off
> 535.019.
>
>
>
|
Sep 12, 2002, 11:22am
Lioness;
You echo my feelings exactly.....what would AWI think of their T-shirt being a reward for cheating? Let's try and set some examples here. And NO i am not upset about the T-Shirt it's the morals involved.... (I can buy the T-shirt today if I wanted one) It was more the "trophy" that I was going for....after all it WAS a "physical challenge" ....and on the TV show, if you cheat on a challenge your out! Let's NOT get into a thing of rewarding cheaters.
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"lioness." <nobody at nowhere.net> wrote in message news:3d808850 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry hon. At first I thought to myself "this seems reasonable", but since I
> have been playing by the rules from the get go, and have been playing those
> challenges honestly and will continue to do so, and since I refuse to change
> my morals just because I am "playing" a game,..... I have changed my mind.
> I'm afraid that if we do something like that, then everyone and their
> brother will be doing graphic tricks to make their score look impressive.
> It's not fair to those of us who are too honest to do that. If Jerme did
> cheat, it makes me extremely upset because I watched my daughter try her
> best to get that high score and she is the one who got our original score of
> 538 (honestly) without any fouls and without copy and pasting a cheat score.
> I will NOT sacrifice what I feel to be right just to allow someone else a
> better chance at "winning" this game or any game. It's not how I was raised
> and it's not the example I want to set for my daughter. And if I am the only
> one left who feels that way, so be it. And if ya'll want to cheat out
> everyone else to win a virtual world, so be it. Just goes to show what our
> world has come to these days. No honesty left. ;-"/
>
>
> "mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
> news:3d807940$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that
> else
> Challenge,
> for
> fall
> female
> especially
> with
> but
> the
> Karma
> :)
> all
> the
> of
> digress...
> be
> two...maki
> my
> come
> to
> come.
> Dollar
> of
> FOR
> means
> decision
> been
> site
> of
> members
> the
> when
> minutes,
> Half
> have
> Hat,
> to
> one
> with
> doin
> me
> i
> person
> will
> two.
> BB,
> to
> vote.
> the
> farther.
> you
> :)
> revote.
>
>
|
Sep 12, 2002, 5:36pm
"> Send in a screenshot of your longest toss and win a tee-shirt." (was not a screen shot)
Impossible to do with cheating going on. Besides you just told everyone to fake the score...so which is it? Do the toss or make the image? Give a little guidance here.
CHALLENGES should be "cheat free" otherwise it is not a challenge. Making images is childsplay.
AND you let someone not even in the game CHEAT and defeat the very people your trying to keep in this "game".
still ticked off
Leo
[View Quote]"nornny11" <Nornny1 at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3d80e982$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oh, I'm not doubting that he played fouled. lol. :) I still can't make out
> much of anything bad other than the score. I guess I don't have the eyes for
> it. I do see a little airbrushing now that you mention it, but I'd really
> have to be trying to look for it. And I'm not about to, to be honest. If you
> want to bend the rules, I've never stopped anyone before, I won't do it now.
> Send in a screenshot of your longest toss and win a tee-shirt. I don't
> defend JerMe for doing what he did, but I personally don't mind it either.
> lol.
>
> --
> --
> From the Newbie's Guide to the AW NG:
>
> "Nornny11 - The original wishy-washy man, this one can actually insult you
> and compliment you in the same breath, and in the end say absolutely
> nothing! What a talent!"
>
> "eric" <eric at disaxiom.net> wrote in message
> news:3d7ff6d1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that
>
>
|
Sep 12, 2002, 7:23pm
Not good enough for me sorry.
I'm out....period.
Leo :)
(I thought I already "snuffed" my torch) hehe
[View Quote]"nornny11" <Nornny1 at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3d8100f1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Survivor is always a touchy subject, because it plays on people's morals and
> beliefs. :)
>
> First, in response to the question about what to do, just simply follow what
> I say. :) For example, this one was get the highest score and send in a
> screenshot. To me, you can always stretch what a screenshot is, whether it's
> a full screenshot or part of one, edited or unedited. :) Get the highest
> score is quite obvious. Do whatever you want to do, I don't condone or
> encourage editing, you do what it takes for you to win comfortably.
>
> If people want to play the game honestly, then play it honestly. I live for
> dirty play, but the game is dirty enough on its own merit. :) this is an
> individual game in the end, and you play to keep yourself in the game. Some
> will do whatever it takes, and others will never lose their morals, even if
> it means losing. Good for them.In the game, there's no concept of morals,
> it's created from the players and viewers, which is what really draws me to
> this reality show. :)
>
> I don't think anyone is cheating, because you can't really cheat in this
> game. lol. Everyone is playing by the rules given to them, some are just
> stretching farther than others. Where it gets touchy is in the community's
> involvement, as you guys mentioned. This has NEVER been a part of any
> survivors, except with the exception of the second season of UK Survivor,
> where the public helped deciding the winner. It wouldn't be justifiable to
> put any of my NG Survivor posts in the community newsgroup if the community
> didn't have a chance to see the show, play the challenges, and so forth, and
> this is my oppurtunity to bring the game to them. :)) I mean, if you're
> kicked out, you can still win a tee-shirt, and you can also exact a lot of
> revenge. Rules apply to them equally as it does to you. :) I will never
> accept a score of 200,000, but I can accept a 525. :) I can't say "You don't
> get a tee-shirt because it's obvious you're cheating." I can't prove
> anything except that I know that a 200,000 can't exist because the maximum
> score on the high score list is 600. Anything I sat will be rebutted back,
> I'm forced to trust what the games tell me. lol. In the end, they can't
> decide who wins Immunity, who gets voted off (most of the time) anymore, and
> what the players themselves will do. It's all about presenting yourself.
> There's a lot of socialogy to it that even I don't quite understand, but you
> can believe that your fate is controlled or not. :)
>
> I can't really say anything to change anyone's mind about this game,
> especially yours BB's. We're just working on two different levels. :) I'm
> just trying to say this is quite fair in my book. Call it a shotty book, but
> I think what JerMe did really exemplifies the lack of integrity this game
> has, which would usually be a bad thing, but it's great for Survivor. :))
> There are still players in the game with GREAT morals, that almost break
> down each week for voting someone off, and then there are players who have
> no remorse, just an eye on the prize. And neither has a true advantage.
> Lioness obviously showed she can beat an edited score without editing, and
> I'm sure she'll continue to do so. And I'm sure others will continue to edit
> scores. There's no guidelines to follow on how to emulate Survivor, these
> are the things that I see fit as acceptable. :/
>
> Anywho, AWI, or at least Flagg, knew very well what they got themselves into
> (those poor things). They were directed to see the first season, controversy
> and all, and knew what I wanted out of this game (which are things like
> this). All they asked was a little more community involvement, and I gave it
> to them. It might seem a bit empty community-wise, but I've done as much as
> I can to integrate the game into the community, if anything, I hope they get
> a good read once or twice a week. lol. But there's so much they can do, and
> this is one aspect of them.
>
>
> --
> From the Newbie's Guide to the AW NG:
>
> "Nornny11 - The original wishy-washy man, this one can actually insult you
> and compliment you in the same breath, and in the end say absolutely
> nothing! What a talent!"
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3d809508$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> being a reward for cheating? Let's try and set some examples here. And NO
> i am not upset about the T-Shirt it's the morals involved.... (I can buy
> the T-shirt today if I wanted one) It was more the "trophy" that I was
> going for....after all it WAS a "physical challenge" ....and on the TV show,
> if you cheat on a challenge your out! Let's NOT get into a thing of
> rewarding cheaters.
> news:3d808850 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> since I
> those
> change
> mind.
> impressive.
> score of
> score.
> a
> raised
> only
> our
> again
> isn't
> now
> winners
> that
> can
> the
> Anyone
>
>
|
Sep 11, 2002, 12:14pm
LOL i just realized this heheheheh The resaon Eep gets no replys from
AW.com is that HE HAS BEEN FILTERED by them hehehehehe Eep.....remember this
old saying......"those that live by the sword, die by the sword".....lol
Squabble on, oh grand one! lol
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
ps; hehe i refer the one....."Those that live by the sword, get shot by those
that don't!" lol
I won't filter ya Eep....your too entertaining...:) (I love watching people
struggle for attention)
[View Quote]"eep" <eepNOSPAM at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3D7EFC9D.60B741B2 at tnlc.com...
> Um, I'm not "scared"--more like annoyed/irritated (as usual). If you even put
1/10 the time and effort I have into creating objects you MIGHT be able to
understand where I'm coming from. Until then you'll just be a putz, I'm
"afraid"...
>
> Consider yourself filtered from now on. I tire of dealing with you.
>
> bowen wrote:
>
block
Andras'
stealing your
>
|
Sep 12, 2002, 11:58am
yes we are ALL filtered.....Eeps filtering system filters us for our "moronic level" so he can post back as quick as possible in a most enlightening way. It has a preproccessor on it to check for grammar so he can correct any gramatical errors as well as spelling and proper english content....if you pass through all of these filters Eep will then refer you to HIS most enlightiening web site so you can view all his plagerized RWX ideas...:)
NEXT....drivvel through
Leo :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message news:3d809c4f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> incompetence.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't ananas already filtered?
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Sep 20, 2002, 11:15am
The only pain I had was the pain of watching the lack of integrity this game is teaching to others. Then again, it's a "wishy-washy" kinda game from a "wishy-washy" kinda guy.
And as far as being weak.....NOT Many people actually concider it a sign of strength.
(standing up for my morals).
Respectfully
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message news:3d8a3557 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> -Dear Diary,
[snip]
COMPLETELY inactive for that strategy to work. BinaryBud, wish he wouldn't
> have quit, but it shows that he was too weak to take the pain ;-)
[snip]
Gosh Mod you haven't figured out how to whack the rest of these posts yet? lol
|
Sep 18, 2002, 3:10pm
I emailed the puke.......:) & i feel better...:)
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message news:3d88af0b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well Bowen, as I see it, examples need to be made in a situation like this.
>
> The person that reported this doesn't realize that the message was forwarded
> from them to the domain site and then to me. So they are trackable.
> When I see someone purposely attempt to ruin something that is meant to be a
> caring move for others, then I see alot of bitterness and misunderstanding
> on their part. And I personally feel sorry for them:(
>
> Am I pissed? You bet:) But at the same time I feel sad for the nark:(
>
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3d88ad46$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yes, the defamation of character is another thing, as it wasn't intended to
> be SPAM
> in nature. To the person that did report this. Have you not seen SPAM
> *ever* before
> in your life? It is such things as "Get rich quick!!!!!!!" and maybe "FREE
> CELEBS
> NUDE."
>
> Hundreds of people e-mailing because they *care* is entirely different then
> recieving
> hundreds of e-mails of spam from one e-mail account just to get you to look
> at their
> page. It's like people e-mailing their senators to get a law changed, or to
> the
> leader of a country to not go to war. It *IS* not SPAM. This cause is
> justifiable
> and has a purpose. It would be spam if 100's of people wrote "you sux," but
> alphabit
> seems more trying to promote intelligent e-mails to the company in question.
>
> Even closer consideration of this makes me think more so that this would win
> a case
> in a small claims court, and even the further up you get (consumers are
> protected
> before businesses) it would still win. $10,000 is a little asinine, even in
> web
> standards. Unless we're talking about aol.com or the likes.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:3d88ab2c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> against
>
>
>
>
|
Sep 18, 2002, 6:03pm
Cyber Squatting is the practice of registering a desirable domain name in the hope that you will be able to sell it to someone else for a much inflated price.
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message news:3d88a9cd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> He's a domain squater, which are becomming illegal as if you registered the domain
> first, you have a layover period of 1-2 years, due to some sort of law they're
> passing to get rid of these squatters. All they do is sit and wait for the old owner
> to come back and pay them 4x's as much as they paid.
>
> Basically, a get rich quick scheme (which are illegal, this is a form of the pyramid
> scheme). We may actually have a case against these people, if we bring this to the
> US courts, if we have a substantial amount of people coming forward to support it.
>
> This wasn't spam, nor is it considerably close enough. I have a couple of characters
> in my head who'd report that as spam.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
>
|
Sep 18, 2002, 6:11pm
Cybersquatting is the act of registering a popular Internet address--usually a company name--with the intent of selling it to its rightful owner.
Comparing cybersquatting to online extortion, Senator Spencer Abraham, a Michigan Republican, has introduced to Congress the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. This bill, if enacted, would make cybersquatting illegal. Violators would be charged a fine of up to $300,000.
this might motivate the squatter to release the domain...:)
Leo :)
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message news:3d88dbba at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> As a community non-profit organization I think Goobs could register it for
> far less. But I'm not sure if it is registered or trademarked after the fact
> if it would be binding.
> There may be a clause however since it was being used currently that he
> might have a case.
> I just hope the folks at the domain registration reconsider.
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns928DDA0606FDBkahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> After a quick search of the USPTO TESS (trademarks), I found no trademarks
> on "awnews" or "aw news", which means we might be able to register awnews
> as a trademark, in which case they won't have much choice but to give it to
> us. Thing is, this cost $325... So, if we can manage to do a bit of fund
> raising and get this ammount, we might be able to get it back :-))
>
> KAH
>
>
|
begin 666 empty.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`(#_`,# P ```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
begin 666 30633032353634323364383864376330__RM_EMPTY_.dat
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`(#_`,# P ```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
begin 666 www.webopedia.com at 468x60-1,468x60-2,125x125-1,336x280,336x280,125x800,cp1,cp2,cp3,cp4,cp5,cp6,cp7!336x280
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`(#_`,# P ```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
Sep 18, 2002, 6:16pm
heres a good read on the laws...:)
http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v7n3/kilian73.html
Leo :)
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message news:3d88dbba at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> As a community non-profit organization I think Goobs could register it for
> far less. But I'm not sure if it is registered or trademarked after the fact
> if it would be binding.
> There may be a clause however since it was being used currently that he
> might have a case.
> I just hope the folks at the domain registration reconsider.
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns928DDA0606FDBkahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> After a quick search of the USPTO TESS (trademarks), I found no trademarks
> on "awnews" or "aw news", which means we might be able to register awnews
> as a trademark, in which case they won't have much choice but to give it to
> us. Thing is, this cost $325... So, if we can manage to do a bit of fund
> raising and get this ammount, we might be able to get it back :-))
>
> KAH
>
>
|
Sep 18, 2002, 6:18pm
i did not say you were wrong at all Bowen hehehehe just trying to add more info to the issue..... :) I'll be posting more later..;) we need to let this guy know we are not ignorant to the subject and that HE actually IS...:)
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message news:3d88dcb7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that you will be able to sell it to someone else for a much inflated price.
>
> How was I wrong with this? That is exactly what this guy is doing, I don't think
> he's made too much money. Most Cyber Squatters register names that expire and were
> really popular. In hopes the owner will come back and increase their profit 500%
> (they register for $10 and charge them $50).
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Sep 18, 2002, 6:20pm
mellow out Bowen....heheheh If ya want i'll tack this notice on my posts...hehehehe
*may have been mentioned by Bowen previously.
LOL
Leo :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message news:3d88ded7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I said that earlier too! Not in that deep of specifics though. :P
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3d88ddfe$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> company name--with the intent of selling it to its rightful owner.
> Republican, has introduced to Congress the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection
> Act. This bill, if enacted, would make cybersquatting illegal. Violators would be
> charged a fine of up to $300,000.
>
>
|
Sep 23, 2002, 12:49pm
Just to clear up some things here....I did email Mike the puke at mostwanteddomains.com I do not know who/whom the "nark" is/was...:)
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message news:3d88b391$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I emailed the puke.......:) & i feel better...:)
>
> Leo :) aka BinaryBud
>
>
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message news:3d88af0b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 19, 2002, 4:16pm
twas thinking the same thing of you Strike....:)
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3d8a0f2e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> WOW!! CAPITAL LETTERS!!! IT MUST BE IMPORTANT! *sarcasm*
>
> For crying out loud stop trying to get attention.
>
>
|
Sep 26, 2002, 7:11pm
AWI trys to keep their fingers out of everything except making money on the program.
You'll find out AWI is a very "skelleton crew" company. All these "clubs" and "organizations" are all public run and sponsored....AWI cannot afford to spend any more money on the program than it does already with the programmers and office staff.
All these extras are considered "community" events....and guess what? ....If AWI goes belly-up tomorrow, I got money on it that says the community will bail it out...AGAIN...:)
The "community' has a lot more "heart" into this than the Staff at AWI. They(AWI) just have money into it.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message news:3d937598 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i just talked to someone from AW and he said its not go figure if you
> can goob
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3D936EBE.4010602 at utn.cjb.net...
> AW???
> http://www.activeworlds.com/
> wish to
>
>
|
Oct 2, 2002, 5:23pm
Yes, fer sure, a slip of the brain ,.... but his heart was in the right place...
Thanx PC Hamster, for trying to warn us.
And a warning to all you "moms" out there....just because your kid is home and in his/her room, does not mean they are in there alone! The internet is the WORST babysitter you can have. You would not let a stranger babysit your child when you leave home would you? Then why would you let someone half way around the world entertain your child in their own room?
Parents need to wise up on this.
IMHO
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message news:3d9b4492 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My first reaction to this is.... why are you posting this on the community
> newsgroup? We can't do anything about it.
>
> My second reaction to this is... at least you took the time to report it.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3D9A9F14.ED50459A at msn.com...
>
>
|
Oct 2, 2002, 6:06pm
that depends........ you feeling....... guilty?
lol
[View Quote]"dion" <Dion at digevo.net> wrote in message news:3d9b516d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Good lord, you trying to get me kicked off the internet? o.O
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3d9b47cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> place...
> and in his/her room, does not mean they are in there alone! The internet
> is the WORST babysitter you can have. You would not let a stranger babysit
> your child when you leave home would you? Then why would you let someone
> half way around the world entertain your child in their own room?
> news:3d9b4492 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> community
> it.
> named
> given
> the
> but
>
>
|
Oct 7, 2002, 5:34pm
One thing as a programmer, that I have learned over the years is when you don't have facts you don't have much....Mark, When you gonna start looking for facts, BEFORE running off your mouth with nothing but criticism? In other words, I'm getting tired of even listening to ya when you follow everything with....."I may be wrong"...... sheeesh, look up the facts before spewing your opinion to us hey? All "I may be wrong" suggests to me is "You don't know".
Leo :)
ps; Thanx for the info J B E L L :)
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3da1daa1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> J... how many people have u had in AWDebate in the last 6 months? About 0?
>
> I may be very wrong, if so I apologise
>
> - Mark
> "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3da1d3a7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 8, 2002, 7:23pm
point is....who cares? the guy is trying to drum up some movement....so what it's BEEN dead.... you had snot running down your face when you were 6 months old too...;)
lol
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3da34434 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Show me proof that AWDebate has had 20 differnt people in it for a debate since the money hike fiasco..
> Thats what I mean
>
> - Mark
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message news:3da33d7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 18, 2002, 12:09pm
yea..... publicly chastising is always a great welcome..... Like he needs 20 different people telling him the same damn thing in open forum. Email works great for this.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message news:Xns92AAD6BD4B67Dkahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> "the game master" <zechariah4 at sprynet.com> wrote in
> news:3dad8f5b at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
> I have nothing against you, your world nor your company, but I think you
> have misunderstood the workings of these groups somewhat, thus behaving in
> a way many of the regulars don't appreciate. It's completely cool that you
> announced that your world had opened and what it was about, that's just the
> point of this group. But that you then started posting news about it all
> the time (winners, downtime info, etc) is not the point of these groups. It
> only concerns you and your users, not the community in general (and
> certainly not many of the groups you posted it to), and should not be
> posted here (in general.discussion it's acceptable though). I think you
> should consider opening a forum of your own on your website where you can
> post news and noteables about the world instead of posting it here. We are
> interested in that there's a new game world, introducing "solid" prizes
> (nearly none of the games will get you things you can touch, but rather
> virtual things you can use in AW, with the exception of the AW t-shirts and
> some one-time events), but not in every little thing that goes on in it. I
> hope this cleared things up a bit, and I hope you'll continue posting more
> on-topic things here in the future :-)) Welcome to the groups!
>
> KAH
|
Oct 23, 2002, 11:17am
http://www.leomauk.com/touristworlds.htm
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:3db610cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Don't bet on it.... Take it to the wishlist hun. They don't care, nor are they going to listen.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough
> trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
> "jamey" <jamey at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3db5eaf3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 23, 2002, 11:19am
With your sharp tongue, you'll be lucky if they don't filter you.
Your a beta tester? speaking of incompetence....:)
Leo :) lol
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:3db610cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Don't bet on it.... Take it to the wishlist hun. They don't care, nor are they going to listen.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough
> trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
> "jamey" <jamey at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3db5eaf3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 2, 2002, 1:29pm
LOL but you must tell the rest of the story.....:) like why the sign
is there? :)
When you have the whole picture it won't make us "Michiganders" look so
silly...:) heheheh
Leo :)
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3dc3ba1c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Reminds me of when my older sister, who was living in Illinois at the
time, stopped on a Michigan highway to take a photograph of a sign that said
"Do not pass when opposing traffic is present" so she could show it to
people back home and let them get a good laugh out of it. :)
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
news:3dbf3f48 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
people
you". I
less
now
has
protect
boxes
light
"do
packed
up at
for a
allowed
it.
your
become so
to
it
Feel
to
has
of
Europe). I
It
within
greece,
things
cause
possible
it
being
that
had
never
I've
to
amazingly
I've
and
us
but
remain
the
think
example
stateswoman
and
home
sets
>
>
|
Nov 5, 2002, 4:00pm
lol good point on the Chicago drivers hehehehhe
Leo :)
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message news:3dc579d8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oh, it's there for a good reason. The other side of the highway in those areas is posted "Keep right except to pass" and has the right of way in a shared passing lane that can be used by traffic going in either direction, so if you're on the side where the sign says "Don not pass when opposing traffic is present" it means you shouldn't pass if you see any cars comming at all even if they are not using that lane, because they have the right of way to use it if they choose to pass someone. Of course, someone living in Chicago wouldn't have much of an opportunity to see a stretch of road that long with "no cars comming" so the concept of havint to post such a sign was understandably something she found quite amusing.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message news:3dc3fd69$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 2, 2002, 1:19pm
TROLL!
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:3dc33b5d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yes very good poetry however it's a lil hard to tell who's side this is
on
>
> "technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
> news:3dc335c1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
artistic
> at that.
> news:3dc3322e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Nov 5, 2002, 3:26pm
YOUR the brick wall sweetie.....look in the mirror....just tell us outright what your problem is....now your taking TZ's lines right out of his mouth....."waste of time and energy" pffft you do that when you wake in the morning.
damn toublemakers.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message news:3dc43b6a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> cough if you want to know what i really think go to email other wise
> just stop it here this IS wasting time and energy like talking to a brick
> wall when most of us know the truth now that you and bit have said it aloud
>
>
> "technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
> news:3dc43a7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> votes ever in a single round of the Cy Awards?
> news:3dc43922 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> are
> was
> has
> is
> to
> who
> the
> perhaps
> if
> something
> answers
> used
> this is
> message
> Please?
>
>
|
Nov 5, 2002, 3:33pm
run Linn run you got someone that is calling your bluff run!!!
Leo :)
[View Quote]"lord perception" <usenetreplies at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3dc44e86 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
> news:3dc43e2e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> word
>
> Okay lets try to straighten this up and please read this carefully.
>
> Making personal insults such as what you are doing is not helping the
> situation and is definitely not making you look any good.
>
> TZ has asked that you bring any issues to light and he will look at them.
> So far what you have given in response to his questions is insults.
>
> So what needs to be done on your part now is to bring any issues that you
> feel need to be raised without the insults and TZ will look at them. Should
> be simple.
>
> If you are unclear about anything I've said, don't hesitate to ask.
>
>
>
|
|
