|
|
binarybud // User Search
binarybud // User Search
Mar 3, 2002, 2:03pm
listen Chris, the only problem i had with you is you were praying on
innocet citizens that's my story and i'm sticking to it. and thanx for
making it obvious that i was dead right on my call. you were caught get
over it.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c823aed at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "But you will need some lessons about "the golden rule"" - oh ? i am fully
> aware of the golden rule, that the one that goes "treat others as you
would
> wish to be treated yourself, do no man a wrong unless he wrongs you, and
> then vengeance is yours" ? Well i follow that golden rule to the dot
> Alphabit, and Leo has wronged me. So now, although i am not seeking
> vengeance, i am seeking that the wrong be put right.
>
> As for making an apology to Leo, you can dream. I will make an apology
on
> his behalf to the AW community however. I am sorry, on Leo's behalf,
that
> he had to be such a fool and make a problem he has with me on a personal
> level, public via this newsgroup.
>
> "I'm willing to take you under my guidance " - who the hell do you think
you
> are ??? Look Alpha, i wish you and your clicky little group of friends
> would wake up. This is a chat program, you are a user, leo is a user, i
am
> a user. You are not any thing special. You have both self proclaimed
> yourselves. Leo a hardcore programmer, who can "programme in any
language
> he likes", and you the leader of some group of ppl that you formed. God,
i
> could go go and find 15 ppl and form some group if i really felt that
> heavily about power, but at least i recognise it would mean absolutely
> nothing.
>
> get real, wake up, its just a chat program.
>
> i dont deny the ppl are real in here, but so am i, and you all treat me
the
> way you are doing so in this newsgroup and i will treat you all in EXACTLY
> the same manner. I wont read any of your posts properly, and i will just
> insult the hell out of every word you say. Its no biggy, i can play the
> same games you do. If you want to be ignorant and fail to read what
others
> say and take it in, thats your LOOK OUT.
>
> Sun
>
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 5:54pm
hey your arguing with AlphaBit not me quit using me as a crutch get
over me i'm done exposing you...:)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c826b73 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AlphaBit
>
> firstly you are guilty of the re-posting thing that all were making such a
> moan about when i was doing such, kindly live by the "self proclaimed
> moderators of the group's rules". It keeps the group sweet. Which is
why
> i compare AW to a fascist world, being run by a number of ppl who have
self
> proclaimed themselves government. Nether the less, that is a by the by
> comment now, already covered that one in a previous post.
>
> Not so sure about some one else having done it, i would credit the
majority
> of being able to spot some tom foolery, and be able to differentiate it
from
> hacking. The rest of the ppl in AWGate were able to, was only BinaryBud
> came accusing me of all sorts.
>
> Resolution, Bud either supports all of his claims and stops skipping
around
> AW like some kind of grand master *trying* to lay down the law with other
> users. Further to that, Bud supports all the claims he has made, both
the
> personal attack ones on myself and the claims to all of his supposed
> "knowledge", admits to his lies and shares with us which things he said
that
> were lies, and which werent. That's a resolution for you, a wrong put
> right.
>
> Well with your judgements so far, and abillity to realise that a
> reputation/length of time with in AW does not warrant instant credibility,
i
> am finding it hard to beleive that ignorance is one of your pet peeves.
> Maybe it is, but you dont show this too well.
>
> Yes the line was crossed long ago. This should have all be sorted out
> between Bud and myself in telegrams where it all started and if Bud hadnt
> have felt the need to try n publicly slurr and lie about me, which, i am
> sure he *thought* was going to get rid of me and return his little bubble
of
> arragance back to its former state, then there would have been no need for
> any of this. The line was cross the moment the man clicked send on that
> initial post of slurrs and lies. The sooner he withdraws his
accussations
> and admits specifically to his lies and supports ANY of his claims that he
> says arent lies, then the issue is over.
>
> I'm glad you had a good time at the rodeo, and cant wait to take a look at
> the photos once the fountain is complete.
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
> p.s. hands up for freedom of speach, i wonder how long before the supposed
> democracy that support freedom of speach is violated when AW remove me
from
> being able to post ?
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 12:07am
LOL wow :)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c817d68 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well Bud
>
> you now have what you want, well sort of any way. I am leaving AW,
> SunWorld is now demolished and i have requested my CIT be terminated.
>
> Now, i hear you giggling away, thinking "i won, i won". Before i leave i
> would just like to finish off with a few points.
>
> a) I had no bad intentions what so ever with the password crack in
> AWGate. I explained that to you when you first telegrammed me after my
> ejection.
>
> b) If you had not been so arrogant in your telegrams i would have never
> even shown you the experimental port scanning bot, which, as i have
pointed
> out many times now, was NEVER intended to be put to evil use. It posted
> the results of the scan in the world, in public. If it was meant to be
put
> to bad use then what would be the point of informing you of what it was
> doing ? Further to that, Bud, if you read your VB-SDK and AW SDK
> documentation, you will see that outside of my world, the bot was useless
> for that purpose any way.
>
> c) If you hadnt had your bubble burst about your coding abillity, after
> you had become so arrogant about your "bots", then i am sure you would
have
> felt no need to have even begun this flaming thread.
>
> d) As for ppl claiming that "Bud" wasnt trying to act as God, please
read
> this :-
> http://www.activeworlds.com/newsletter/0500/05003.html
> Particular attention to Bud(Leo) speaking about the "I have two
> versions of the same plot..and here's the strange part.they are both of my
> FACE.. The first one I did was way out on the outskirts of AW 95n 32595w,
by
> my huge pyramid(Built with the testing versions of RoboBuilder). ", if
that
> doesn't say something to you folks then i dont know what will.
>
> e) Many of you i am sure will now be thinking, "oh Sun, has been asked
to
> leave by AW, hahahaha". I can assure you that this is not the case, if
you
> need this confirmed please ask PK 8 or 48, both of which i have
telegrammed
> asking if they are able to terminate my CIT.
>
> f) I have chosen to leave AW for a number of reason :-
>
> 1) AW it seems to me is full of people who wish they were something
> that they are not, Bud is one such example of this. I have met a number
of
> others, some mentioned in my posts, most not. I can do with out these
> people, they are the sort that have come into a once propserous industry
for
> the skilled, with arrogance and bs and have helped in the down fall of the
> IT industry globally. Bud has not yet supported his claim that he "can
> programme any language he chooses" and if you read his resume you will
see,
> in his own words, that he has programmed nothing other than VB, i see
> nothing but Visual Basic and a good sell for it,"This software project
> utilizes Visual Basic, a wonderfully productive windows programming
> language", on his resume. Please see :- http://www.leomauk.com/resume.htm
> I have gotten bored of constant slurring, now to the point where i have a
> little army of hacker want to be's following me around wanting me to show
> them how to "hack", i am not a hacker as Bud would like you to beleive.
>
> 2) If i really want to build with out the harrassment, its much
more
> simpler to goto the local toy store and purchase a Lego building set :)
>
> 3) Far to much time is being spent by me in AW, with little
> productivity. I am steadily getting more bored with the place which is
> also another reason for me to leave. I think its time i get back into
> coding in my free time, rather than chatting. I have a huge project
> planned for the next few months, i am sure you are all dieing to know what
> it is huh ? Despite Bud's claims of myself being a hacker, the project i
> have planned is in no way illegal. And no Bud, its not a bot, life
doesnt
> revolve around bots. What i have planned is a larger project than a
'bot'.
> Keep you eyes open for SunWorlds over the coming months. I plan to write
> and host my own AW type software(probably in c++ and on the linux platform
> Bud, yes thats right Bud, i dont bs, as my coding examples demonstrated
but
> you were to ignorant to acknowledge.) and allow FREE access to all. At
> least this way, if it should become full of the moronic types such as Bud,
> at least no one will have to pay for his idiocy.
>
> To any one i have offended or anyone who feels that i have threatened them
i
> apologise, however miscommunications occurr easily when the majority of
> minds/attitudes are being biased by a sorry loser. One only has to look
at
> how Hitler accussed the Jews of all sorts in WWII and had his loyally
> following army attempt to destroy them. Again some one who had a
> reputation before hand, and used this reputation in a corrupt manner with
no
> one realising what was going on.
>
> To all the whiners out there, i am very sorry if this post is way to long,
> but i hope that it may be deemed well thought out and have all my points
in
> one clean posting.
>
> Finally, to Bud. Well my sorry ass loser friend, there you go, i have
> GIVEN you what you want. Your bubble almost back in one piece. Now you
> can wander around AW acting out your Godly fantasies locked in side your
> cage of dellusions. Pretending that you are the most "leet" person as
far
> as AW goes. I think i have proved plenty enough through out my posts
that
> this by far contrary to reality. I think i proved that in our initial
> telegrams, have you managed to look up the port no that the old win nukes
> used to use and how they worked, what about the C++ scope operator, that
you
> i would have supposed you would know being that you "can programme in any
> language" that you choose. Just for your informational purposes Bud,
just
> incase some one asks you the same questions, the scope operator is "::",
and
> as for the win nuker, i'll leave you to look that one up, use the key
words
> "netbios" and "OOB" that will help you. You may have the people in AW
> fooled, but then the average user is not hard to have think anything you
> like if you know a few keywords and wrote a few Visual Basic "macro bots"
> when AW was relatively new, and gained yourself a name/reputation right
from
> the beginning. But i dare say, there are a number of people out there
who
> have read and understood correctly the posts and points i made. I am
sure
> now they at least see the credibility of your claims. I look forward to
> seeing you in SunWorlds :)
>
> Any way, farewell, what the hell, m off to start my new project :)
>
> lots of love and kisses [more to Angel. though, just because]
>
> kris[SunOfSolaris]
>
> xxxxxxxxxx
> xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 2:04pm
what can't take your own medicine i see...lol and you don't know what a
killfile is heheheh lol wow your really impressing the group now
Chris...:)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c823e69 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> does it mean like a file that is going to KILL me ?????
> oh man, first i bet get my life insurance increased and second i should
> start being scared right ???
> swe, you are right man. totally
> i cant beleive there are ppl in here who would call me "skript kiddy"
> ...........
>
> Sun
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c823d79 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
rude,
majority
to
> loyally
manner
> ignored.
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 2:15pm
ok Chris i have asked you privately in email to stop this....several times.
i will be back in quiet mode for now....all emails to my account will be
forwarded to abuse.net thanyou very little.
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c823643$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> one further point, i apologise to all of those who whined at me for not
> getting it all in in one mail.
>
> i am sure that Leo claimed to have been completely "self taught" and was
in
> fact quite proud of the 'fact'. So Leo, when was it that you were in
> university, that you would have been using the "Merit" network any way ?
> Or is it that you prefer to forget about going to university and FAILING ?
> Is this what this is all about ? You are sore because i didnt ? Dood,
> you have one huge chip on your shoulder.
>
> or another possibility, perhaps Leo is something hardcore. Perhaps he
used
> to HACK the "Merit" network and DARPA for his access in the "early 70's".
> Wouldnt that make him just a little hypocritical in accusing me of hacking
> because of a demonstration of a bot that port scanned ?
>
> enough said
>
> Sun
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 2:44pm
easy cause your still pushing my buttons ....and i hardly think a 10 to 1
email ratio is worth you mentioning hon.
why you doing this really? wish i knoew what i said to get you turned
on like this...lol could be a handy catchphrase sometime...tho a bit
dangerous as i am seeing...lol
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c824f3e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Leo if you want me to stop emailing me then why continue to mail me :-
> "----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leo Mauk" <lmauk at traverse.net>
> To: "Sun of Solaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: AND THEN THERE WAS SILENCE
>
>
huh
mind
> "
>
> and just so that i dont mail you, as you requested, i will respond here.
>
> I already know which you are. Being as all your Telnet/Lynx claims have
> been proven, with supporting evidence, to be total bs. So yes i would
most
> definately with out a doubt imply from this you are the latter, a BS'er.
> As i have been claiming and proving all along.
>
> If any one else would like to see the rest of the emails and responses to
> and from Leo, please feel free to email me and request a copy. At worst
> they are worth a giggle, at best they will serve to prove the nature of
this
> whole waste of time thread over a waste of time situation, that Leo here
has
> decided to try and turn to some advantage.
>
> *yawn*
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 2:46pm
oh and BTW what the hell does this mean? "ph33r ju". ? sheeesh
use english ok? (bait)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c821e8c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Very sorry to disappoint you all and have to return to the newsgroup so
> soon. Furhter evidence has arisen of Leo Mauk's bs and i felt i just had
> to share this with you. To save being accussed of pointless over sized
> quoting and cutting/pasting i will explain briefly.
>
> Your hero, Leo, emailed me claiming he was pulling the same tricks as I in
> the early 70's. To which i responded, no i dont think you were, unless
he
> was in the military, as at that time the "internet", known as DARPA at
that
> time, was still a military only project. I also suggested he learnt his
> history before continuing to bs.
>
> In response, your hero Leo claimed he was using telnet and lynx on the
> "Mertit" network that connected universities at that time. Again false,
> as i point out in my repose to him. The internet wasnt used in
> universities as a form of communication until the 80's. I have no
> knowledge of the "Merit" network and dont have time to do any research on
> it, so am unable to comment. However, telnet and lynx in the early 70's
?
> Again, bs, The Lynx project was developed originally in DOS, possibly in
the
> late 80's(at which time, with the use of some software such as TomCat, DOS
> couldnt implement a tcp/ip stack anyway let alone connect to the internet)
> But, the point being here, Lynx wasnt actually around til 1994(please see
> link below to support : http://www.trill-home.com/lynx.html )
>
> Now his claim of telnet in the 70's ? Again, more bs, as i told him in
my
> reponse. How he could have been using a product who's protocol wasnt
even
> defined, by Postel, until the early 80's i have no idea. This link will
> support this
> http://edt.uow.edu.au/elec195/group-projects-2k/group10/hostory.htm
>
> These are just some of the false claims your hero has been making in
> personal emails to myself.
>
> I dont mind any one who want to talk bs, and try and pretend they are
> something they are not. BUT, surely once they know they are going to put
> straight, (and publicly exposed when they try and publicy ridicule with no
> support or evidence) its time to think, "do i really want to continue
this
> ?"
>
> Leo, i have proved, over and over again, you talking out of your backside.
> Dont bother emailing me again, i am not interested in anything you have to
> prove. I think you have already proved all i need to know. I'm not
going
> to repeat what you have proved, its there for all to see in the thread you
> started.
>
> Also as i said in my email Leo, i am glad you are building a library of my
> stuff, i hope it comes in handy to you in your next attack on some one who
> you think will "ph33r ju". Even better, i would be even happier if you
> learnt something from it, be it that you are not what you think you are,
or
> just a little history for that matter :)
>
> sorry to have to return to point these things out, if any one should
happen
> to be interested in the rest of the bs he has been talking or would like a
> copy of the emails he sent along with reponses, please dont hesitate to
> request a copy by personal email. I wouldnt wanna to upset any one
elses
> apple cart by posting them in here ;)
>
> any way back to the project ........
>
> kris[SunOfSolaris]
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 2:53pm
this neds to be said also....right from the beginning i told you that i do
not hide on the net i have everything about me out in the open hell
remember in the beginning of this when you thought you were trying to scare
me with posting to me my own street address and phone number....like some
psycho threat or something.....the address right were i live imagine
that,..... i post that info on the web....why? cause i have nothing to
hide and need nothing to hide behind....... all these things about me that
you are "exposing" hehehe are all public knowledge anyhow.....i never said
i was a "god" as you have labeled me.....i
m just a regular joe that happens to work in the PC field......maybe the
self taught thing is what got you mad not sure..... please put out in the
open the reason you are attacking me and will not give up? inquiring minds
wanna know......?
Mar 3, 2002, 3:07pm
i made no claims to you just try to reason with you to end this
crap...it's really tiring.
please stop. go hack someone elses playground ok?
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c825634 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i see your maths is not to hot either Bud, the ratio is currently 17:12 to
> me, not even 2:1 Leo.
>
> i am doing this Leo, to expose the likes of you. Your bubble is burts,
> accept it, get over it, move on.
>
> still only sarcasms Leo ? still no support of any of your claims ?
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 3:12pm
only thing that works with you is to shut up so i am...oh BTW that was
real sharp of you to figure out you could cut and paste my address from my
resume page heheheheh lol remember it's all public info...wow your such a
clever lad...;)
ok i do have a claim.....i claim you are off your rocker....please read
above for my proof....:)
LOL hehehe
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c8257b7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Remember why i posted your name and address to you Bud ?
> Well, it was when you were making a number of claims that you were going
to
> have me removed from my isp, and i asked you who my isp was, you know just
> to back up your claim yada yada yada
> Then i asked you who you were trying to scare and not to go shouting about
> things you couldnt do. Yes i did post your name and address to you just
to
> show you that i CAN do the things you CLAIM you can.
>
> again Bud, put up or shut up, show us some evidence of what you CLAIM you
> can do.
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
> p.s. there is a definate trend forming here, Bud insults/slurs me, and i
> defend myself on what he has says, and instantly feels the urge to try n
> darken my name again. Hmmmm suspiciously like he doesnt want me here
full
> stop. Wonder why that is Bud ? constant reminder/threat of some one
> showing the AW world what you really are ?
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 3:25pm
those were PRIVATE conversations never meant for the public. if i lied to
anyone at anytime it was YOU.... cause you needed it at the time i got
what i wanted for you at the time(what you were doing in your world, your
home page...ect.) and exposed what you were up to....plain and
simple.... you got mad at me for exposing you....sorry it hurt you so
much.....oh when is your beta gonna be ready? lol love to see this
one....:)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c825a95$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i would draw ppl's attention's to the initial posts in BinaryBud's thread
on
> this matter, please see the posted telegrams that were posted between
> BinaryBud and myself :)
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 3:32pm
lol check the source date on that page before inserting foot....;)
and so you looked up who owns leomauk.com what a genius> Just updated your
page then Bud ?
and wen you post lies like this and expect everyone to believe them post
your proof from now on cause quite simpley you have been BS'ing everyone
here all alnog with your claims, and attacks on me... now i post to you to
offer proof of your talents....not just your mouth show what your hands
can do....we all know your mouth is in good shape...lol
> if you remember it wasnt there when i visited it, *yawn* a sad childish
> thing to do
> Still trying to figure out how i got it, right ? It really isnt n e
thing
> clever, and i am sure 50% of the people who are in this newgroup know
> EXACLTY how i did. I'm VERY surprised you dont, after all the claims you
> have made.
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
Mar 3, 2002, 3:34pm
it's something i keep forgetting about i have nothing to prove..... i've
been there and done that..... Chris you need to show what your all
about.....and port scanning does not qualify....that is lame PC 101
shit..... go for it it's your floor now....;)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c825b93 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Just updated your page then Bud ?
> if you remember it wasnt there when i visited it, *yawn* a sad childish
> thing to do
> Still trying to figure out how i got it, right ? It really isnt n e
thing
> clever, and i am sure 50% of the people who are in this newgroup know
> EXACLTY how i did. I'm VERY surprised you dont, after all the claims you
> have made.
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 3:48pm
and all thes posts by you claiming to know something "enlightening" about
me...are all drempt up by you with no proof to back them up....much like i
can say that your mother is a tramp and wears army boots and you cannot
prove she is not and does not..... so it must be...heheheh get real.....
go ahead and post those long detail ridded posts spewing your thoughts.....
by now most people here can see through you.... i guess i donot mind
exposing myself as long as i have......if it helps rid this community of
people like you..... and no i'm not some self proclaimed sherrif of AW.....
i'm usually a lurker i watch....and learn..... love to help at the
gate........ i yak with buds and i program on my bots and world for fun....
but when i see someone like you giving a bad name to the net and attacking
people..... well i cannot sit idly by and watch you have free rein on all
the innocent people here at their expense.... grandma's and teenagers alike
come here to have fun and learn...... go harrass people on IRC they are
more of a challange for ya...:). ya know about the port scanning thing
heres my take on that.....lets say you were a nice guy just playong around
with your new C++ compiler and the SDK.... and you did this little port
scanner thing with your bot..... your a good guy(cough).....i come to your
world and visit and say something to your bot..... out spews all my open
ports right in public......funny i';m an old grandma and have lots of open
ports on my new PC...... no big deal right....well not to me....but the guy
standing next to me just did a screen cap of them and teleported back to his
world to proccess the info...zip-zam-zowie-swoosh.....he has 5 exploits for
my IP that he can start hammering on old grandma with..... sheeeesh port
scanning is hacking no matter how you look at it.... there is no reson for
anyone to kow about anyones open ports....so drop your crap and get the heck
outta dodge you were caught......live with it.
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c825a95$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i would draw ppl's attention's to the initial posts in BinaryBud's thread
on
> this matter, please see the posted telegrams that were posted between
> BinaryBud and myself :)
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 3:50pm
kewl took me a while to catch up with ya hehehehe :) thanx
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c825d16 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Leo please stop emailing me, you asked me not to mail you and i have
stopped
> :-
>
> "From: "Leo Mauk" <lmauk at traverse.net>
> To: "sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com>
> References: <3c817cb8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>
> <3c823aed at server1.Activeworlds.com> <3c82546f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>
> <3c825a4b at server1.Activeworlds.com>
>
> "But the only people i have a problem
> with are the ppl who are sitting in this newsgroup slurring and judging,
> with absolutley NO evidence"
>
> gosh i was thinking the exact same thing and wondering HOW to get rid if
> people like this?
> "
>
> yes Leo, i am assuming you are trying to target me again, even tho the
> description doesnt fit. The only thing i am judging you to be is what i
> have said many times now. But who could blame me, you cause all this
> trouble and still WONT/CANT support a word you have said ?
>
> Yes, Leo, i know you are trying to get rid of me, i have said that MANY
> times now to.
>
> soon as you are ready to stop your petty trouble making, let me know Leo,
> via the newsgroup please :)
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 5:56pm
***YAWN***
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c826721$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> dood
>
> Yes i doubt you, VERY MUCH(as i have expressed), i have backed up every
word
> i have said, you havent, its you with the proving to do, the masses of
> followers with in your little clicky band of friends may say they beleive
> you to, but i have NO DOUBT at all that they are questioning your
> credibility greatly right now. Showing any proof at all for you is going
> to be quite difficult now, being in a previous posting you have already
> ADMITTED TO LIEING.
>
> IF you are and old grandma, who doesnt know much about computers, then,
why
> are you masqerading as some one who does ? Surely you know you will meet
> your match sooner or later and you are essentially asking for trouble,
> unless of course YOU CAN BACK UP your words. And written in c++ ?
LMAO,
> no man its written in VB with the VB SDK i downloaded to check out the
other
> day. I write proper software with c++ as the code listing i sent you
shows
> and supports.
>
> give up man, you're wasting your time now, and the more you talk the more
> pathetic you are looking, save the little bit of credibility and respect
> that you do have left.
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 7:08pm
thanx Kit i've been looking for a history page like that hehehe i
remember "cruising around on Merit" connecting to Modems and dialing out to
my favorite BBS's around the country back in the mid 70's twas a riot just
using Telnet...:) and all free i might add....:) and i believe it was an
email proggy called Lynx i used.....do you remember that one? I thought it
was DOS based..... maybe that was a CPM proggy?
[View Quote]"kit" <dominicl at clear.net.nz> wrote in message
news:3C828BB2.949BCC41 at clear.net.nz...
> I suggest it might be SunofSolaris who needs to learn a bit of history.
This
> link I've provided is a good start. This page gives dates, universities,
> programmes and yes, it mentions "Merit" too. Some of us are not children
but
> rather, as you put it "script kiddies" since the early 70's. We know our
history
> because we were there.
> http://home2.pacific.net.sg/~limlys/Internet%20History.htm
>
> Cheers, Kit
> sunofsolaris wrote:
>
in
he
that
his
false,
on
70's ?
the
DOS
internet)
see
in my
even
will
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 7:50pm
maybe the LYNX i used was a DOS based proggy i don't remember...it WAS a
long time ago about the time you were shitting your diapers heheheh but
when i get a copy you'll eat it son...keep pressing my buttons it's
fun...:)
won't last much longer but fun none the less...;)
[View Quote]"sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c829589 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I suggest you read the links i supplied to BinaryBob that will prove
> contrary, one of which is a mirror of the OFFICIAL Lynx site ....... yeah
> man , lol, *BIG YAWN*
>
> No one ever said anything about Merit, although i will check up on it
later,
> out of interest more than anything else. What i did question tho was
> BinaryBud's use of Lynx & Telnet in the 70's, as he claims.
>
> How the hell can you use something that hasnt even been invented at the
time
> ????
>
> Telnet protocol, developed and published , early 80's
>
> Lynx, development started late 80s, distroed early 90's
>
> if you really wish me to post the supporting links again, please say.
>
> cheers
>
> Sun
>
>
>
|
Mar 6, 2002, 9:40pm
no it does not pay....:( And i hope everyone will accept my appologies for
Starting it all off. :(
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c86a27d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ahhh well you may disagree and that is your right , but .... I was right (
> see Flaggs post )
>
> I was talking to EVERYONE in my post and calling for sensible behaviour
from
> all concerned so that intervention was not warranted , but it seems that
the
> issue has been solved ( again, thank you Flagg )
>
> It really dosent pay to have a thin skin in these newsgroups does it ppl?
>
>
|
Mar 5, 2002, 7:39pm
For those interested in protecting your PC from outside intruders....please check out this site: www.grc.com Steve Gibson has a
web page called "Shields-Up" this page will test your PC to see if you have any open ports that can be used to gain entry to your
PC.... If you do have open ports there is an easy software soluton you can get from www.zonelabs.com called "ZoneAlarm". Steve
Gibson recommends this for basic home users to protect themselves...... Please read-up on the Shields-Up page for an explaination
of all this..... Happy Computing!!!!
Leo :)
ps; Run the Shields-Up test BEFORE getting Zone Alarm and then again after you've installed Zone Alarm to see the difference.
Mar 6, 2002, 1:14pm
thats very good you must be behind a firewall huh? :)
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c862cd8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> woohoo! no problems with my computer, this is what it said:
>
> Attempting connection to your computer. . .
> Shields UP! is now attempting to contact the Hidden Internet Server within
> your PC. It is likely that no one has told you that your own personal
> computer may now be functioning as an Internet Server with neither your
> knowledge nor your permission. And that it may be serving up all or many of
> your personal files for reading, writing, modification and even deletion by
> anyone, anywhere, on the Internet!
>
> Your Internet port 139 does not appear to exist!
> One or more ports on this system are operating in FULL STEALTH MODE!
> Standard Internet behavior requires port connection attempts to be answered
> with a success or refusal response. Therefore, only an attempt to connect to
> a nonexistent computer results in no response of either kind. But YOUR
> computer has DELIBERATELY CHOSEN NOT TO RESPOND (that's very cool!) which
> represents advanced computer and port stealthing capabilities. A machine
> configured in this fashion is well hardened to Internet NetBIOS attack and
> intrusion.
>
> Unable to connect with NetBIOS to your computer.
> All attempts to get any information from your computer have FAILED. (This is
> very uncommon for a Windows networking-based PC.) Relative to
> vulnerabilities from Windows networking, this computer appears to be VERY
> SECURE since it is NOT exposing ANY of its internal NetBIOS networking
> protocol over the Internet.
>
>
> thats good right? or does that indirectly mean my pc internet is abit
> fucked?
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c853b11$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> intruders....please check out this site: www.grc.com Steve Gibson has a
> have any open ports that can be used to gain entry to your
> get from www.zonelabs.com called "ZoneAlarm". Steve
> Please read-up on the Shields-Up page for an explaination
> after you've installed Zone Alarm to see the difference.
>
>
|
Mar 7, 2002, 4:03pm
Check this article out....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51958-2002Mar6.html
"Hold on to your wallet: This may go down in Internet history as the year
millions of people started paying for online content. My digital radar shows
a blip of activity in electronic subscriptions, enough to make me think real
online businesses are finally being born."
FYI
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
Mar 8, 2002, 6:35pm
kewl BB waves arms in the air to clear the smoke from kah's bazooka........Now, put yourself in their shoes and own the
business..... how you gonna make money?
The money has to come from somewhere ? :)
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message news:3c8917b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *takes out bazooka and shoots up all those annoying ppl that wanna take
> money for content*
>
> KAH
>
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c87ab8e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> shows
> real
>
>
|
Mar 12, 2002, 1:10pm
I don't even know what country your from kiddo.....but i'll bet that your country donated a lot less per capita than the United
States of America did to those dieing in Africa..... If i'm wrong, you'll let me know...:)
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c8e0ed4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> speak for urself, but i couldnt give any less of a shit bought what happened
> in america...u people dont see beyond ur own country do u? what bought the
> millions of people dying in africa cuz of desieses that wouldnt cost ore
> then $5 per person to cure, and do u give a shit bout them? dont think
> so....
> "lioness e" <nobody at nowhere.net> wrote in message
> news:3c8deb48 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> in
> who
>
>
|
Mar 12, 2002, 3:50pm
wow you need to get out more your "view" of the world is quite warped.
also try reading MORE material....not just the ones you think you believe....:)
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c8e3b03 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> emm, accully, just to let u know i am in africa, libya to be exact, and well
> u cant say that libya doesnt donate to the african countries, cuz where u
> think most the money goes? america dont donate shit for the good of others,
> if they donate to a country, its so they can take there diomands or oil, or
> gold or something, and they dont donate cash, all weapons to put there
> "puppets" in place....
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c8e1a72$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> country donated a lot less per capita than the United
> let me know...:)
> news:3c8e0ed4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> happened
> the
> crashed in
> another
> topic.
> the
> those
> There
> low
> just a
> one
> flew
>
>
|
Mar 12, 2002, 4:23pm
that's really funny....cause i do not believe EVERYTHING i hear....that was the point i was trying to make to YOU!
Tell me how your so "enlightened"? Who you been listening to? LOL
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c8e4663 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> emm, no its u americans that need to stop believing what CNN and ABC tell u!
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3c8e3fd7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> believe....:)
> news:3c8e3b03 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well
> u
> others,
> or
> your
> you'll
> bought
> ore
> think
> felt
> stoop so
> on
> huh?
> news
> the
> that
> think
>
>
|
Mar 13, 2002, 3:46pm
boy, your a hoot....... oh BTW it's spelled "about" :)
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c8f82c0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> u can thank me for that :) just what pisses me off is that everyones getting
> soo upset bought this little incident, and making it look like the end of
> the world, instead of the real issues...
> "gandalf" <Gandalf2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c8f6610 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2002, 11:55am
well not to be picky but how the hell can you correct me on spelling you have the total wrong word then when I tell you
about it....... you correct ME....... FYI your soooooo wrong it's not even funny anymore...it's sad....the word your trying to use
is spelled "ABOUT" ..... period, end of conversation..... :)
Leo :)
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c912999 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sorry bout my rudeness, im sleepy, hence feeling grumpy
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c912749 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2002, 12:06pm
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3c9126e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> no, what im complaining bout is the fact someone would post this, making it
> sound like its such a big thing, when its just a tiny ammount of people,
> making it sond like americas some kinda aryan race or somethign! or
> something like that, cant really explain
|
"cant really explain" i think this is your problem you just wanna flap your gums.
Just an observation...but i think you've been listening to your parents
too much and have not actually formed your own opinion yet.... I say this because you
seem to have strong views about Americans, but yet you cannot explain WHY
you have these views. I, like a lot of other Americans get a little miffed when someone
dislikes us but cannot say why..... and when they do finally say why....it's sooooo off base
that it's kinda confusing as to how they come up with these views.
Leo :)
Mar 12, 2002, 6:47pm
How about calling themn the "V-Games" and instead of using connected Circles, use United Squares of different colors......:)
Did i hear someone chant "logo contest....logo contest....logo contest"?
Leo :)
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message news:3c8e4d65$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but here is the reply I received from
> the Olympics Committee;
> (maybe a logo and name contest is in order?:)
>
> Dear Ms. Tuttle:
>
> This will respond to your e-mail request for permission to use the Olympic
> Symbol for a "Virtual Olympics" as set forth below. You may not be aware
> that all Olympic imagery and terminology, including the Olympic Symbol and
> even the word OLYMPIC, are protected under the Ted Stevens Olympic and
> Amateur Sports Act, in which Congress granted the United States Olympic
> Committee ("USOC") the exclusive right to use and control the use of
> Olympic imagery and terminology in the United States. (A copy of the
> relevant portion of the Act is attached for your convenience.) Congress
> granted the USOC this right in order to allow it to license these marks for
> the legitimate and exclusive use by our sponsors and licensees, who provide
> the funding to feed, house and train U.S. Olympic athletes. Without their
> support, we would not be able to fulfill these important responsibilities.
> Therefore, we reserve the right to use such imagery and terminology to
> those providing such support to our athletes and Olympic programs. Under
> the Act, the USOC has the right to file a civil action against any
> unauthorized use of Olympic-related marks. In order to protect the value
> of these marks, we try to carefully police all unauthorized uses.
> Therefore, the USOC cannot consent to the use of the Olympic Symbol
> (regardless of the color of the Rings) and requests that you do not use the
> name "Virtual Olympics" for the event but select another name altogether.
>
> I hope that this addresses your concerns.
>
> Kelly Maynard
> Office of the General Counsel
> United States Olympic Committee
>
>
>
|
|
