wing // User Search

wing // User Search

1  ...  3  4  5  6  7  8  ...  40  |  

a way to hold more then 100 contacts :-)

Apr 5, 2001, 9:45pm
I've seen the statistics on brain filesize :) But that gives a LOT of people in this world too much credit.

--
I live in a world of stupid people...
Even though I'm smart enough to know this,
I'm still dumb enough to live.
[View Quote] Oh, and you should check your knowledge about possible file sizes,
here are 2 links that might help you :

http://www.abbottloop.org/alconweb/i_c_r/zbrain.htm
http://www.jimpinto.com/writings/symbiotic.html

If you do not find a medium that can take the required amount of data
you will hardly be able to create a single file that can contain all
the informations a brain can hold.

[View Quote]

a way to hold more then 100 contacts :-)

Apr 5, 2001, 9:46pm
Amen that. The social rejects of AW with GIGANTIC contact lists of every single citizen would make a game out of logging on and
watching everyone "leave"
[View Quote]

a way to hold more then 100 contacts :-)

Apr 8, 2001, 6:41pm
Hrmm. 26 drives max, letters A and B need to be reserved to floppy, so that's 24. At 100 gigs a drive, that's 2,400 gigs. Which is
two terrabytes. Human brain size is approximately 10 terrabytes, and we just MAY be overestimating that because we think we're so
special.
[View Quote]

a way to hold more then 100 contacts :-)

Apr 8, 2001, 9:07pm
I was simply proving his 1000x maximum electronic storage statement wrong in my own little way. 2.4x1000=10? Um no.
[View Quote]

a way to hold more then 100 contacts :-)

Apr 9, 2001, 1:49am
I can pick out only EXTREMELY select and VERY vague images from nine years ago at max. Hell, I don't even know what I wore
yesterday. For the most part, only very traumatic images are stored for later retrieval. Not too much extra space unless you've been
to war or the like.
[View Quote]

someone who is getting MADDDDD

Apr 8, 2001, 9:09pm
Yeah, just increase framerates and (I think) add OGL. Ejecting all beta testers would be frowned on and cause people like me to come
in and seriously vandalize your world
[View Quote]

someone who is getting MADDDDD

Apr 8, 2001, 11:45pm
Um? It wouldn't unless you were on beta :)
3.0 and 3.1 display everything the same with the exception of light. If you're not into people seeing things ever so slightly
different, eject all the people still running 2.2, they see a HELLUVA lot different than people running a slightly faster version of
3.1 with another notch added onto the first decimal.
[View Quote]

Two aws

Apr 8, 2001, 6:48pm
There are cloners that can supposedly do that, but the other way the two people could have had the same IP is being on ICS or the
like.
[View Quote]

Two aws

Apr 9, 2001, 1:43am
Which is illegal. *whack* Keep it out of the NG's if you must say it.
[View Quote]

Two aws

Apr 9, 2001, 6:03pm
Yeah, good point :)
[View Quote]

Scroll Down box

Apr 8, 2001, 6:49pm
Seperate file in a seperate directory with the hidden attribute :)
[View Quote]

Scroll Down box

Apr 8, 2001, 9:11pm
Precisely. In fact, even after YEARS of having hidden files visible, I still forget to turn it back on after a simple reformat for
at least a few hours, if not weeks. (Reformats are regular maintinence on my machines will less than 2 gigs of disk space)
[View Quote]

Scroll Down box

Apr 8, 2001, 11:51pm
A simple form of encryption would take the PPW, convert it into a string of numbers (A=1 B=2 Z=26) and the numbers in the PPW into
letters (1=A 2=B) and then perform the same conversion on the screenname of the owner, throw out spaces, add together the numbers
for the user's name and add the total to each entry in the converted PPW, except for the letters which would remain the same (these
were originally numbers). To decrypt the conversion would be performed on the user's name again and then subtracted. This is then
converted to original form and submitted to the uniserver for approval. Of course, all numeric PPWs would be frowned upon because
the encryption doesn't work for them.
[View Quote]

New Rights Feature

Apr 9, 2001, 7:40am
That would be somthing similar to *, -0
[View Quote]

Two Action Languages

Apr 9, 2001, 10:57pm
Been suggested, been agreed on as kewl0r
[View Quote]

Two Action Languages

Apr 10, 2001, 1:09pm
I remember reading a series of examples. Of course, this was posted before light and move so this is more updated
[View Quote]

Name changing

Apr 21, 2001, 7:04pm
I THOUGHT WE KILLED YOU! *drops to the ground and grabs his plascannon*
[View Quote]

Bring back test NG (N/t)

Apr 14, 2001, 2:19am

If it can be done to world lists it can be done to contact lists...

Apr 16, 2001, 8:23am
Hrmm, maybe just expand it by fifty more, we dont want the server getting nuked by dozens of contact lists querying for citizens 1
through 100000000000000000000
[View Quote]

If it can be done to world lists it can be done to contact lists...

Apr 18, 2001, 7:46am
Its the social butterflies that think they have 100 friends but in reality 97 refuse to respond to them and 98 honestly hate them :)
[View Quote]

Trial worlds revisited

Apr 16, 2001, 8:24am
AW wouldn't sell as many worlds that way. It's all buisiness, theres no way that begging by us would get them to change their
buisiness practices that much.
[View Quote]

I DESPERATELY NEED YOUR HELP!

Apr 18, 2001, 7:44am
Smooooooooooooth.
[View Quote]

I DESPERATELY NEED YOUR HELP!

Apr 18, 2001, 7:57am
Hrmm, now that I think about it, how exactly can they tell your running servers? What else do they know?
[View Quote]

I DESPERATELY NEED YOUR HELP!

Apr 19, 2001, 7:45am
If I pay $40 a month for constant 200kbps, by god I'm going to use it ALL
[View Quote]

I DESPERATELY NEED YOUR HELP!

Apr 19, 2001, 5:02pm
Only times my 56k line isn't 100% in use are when I'm on the toilet or about to engage in a super bandwidth sucking project (Tribes,
Tribes 2, downloads)
[View Quote]

I DESPERATELY NEED YOUR HELP!

Apr 23, 2001, 9:21pm
The rules apparently aren't against commercial operations, just servers in general. I don't take kindly at all to at Home's rather
public intrusion into semi-private information though, and who knows how much information they could be gathering "Haha, look at
this lame little cyber zombie. Thinks he's found himself a girlfriend"

After experiencing at Home's anti-serverness first hand, when doing a closed IP access ONLY test run of an HTTP server to make sure I
had the software installed and configged right, I'm nearly positive that they're 100% against any server on their connection, I'm
sure if you were playing on a game server of your own for more than an hour they'd be on your case.
[View Quote]

JBELLS WORLDS

Apr 18, 2001, 7:41am
Can't fight at Home, newblood. No caps either.
[View Quote]

Free Internet without Banners?

Apr 23, 2001, 10:58pm
$10 for one of those - wowee, that's expensive

[View Quote]

VOTE: ALL PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR AW READ

Apr 23, 2001, 9:41pm
*slap* WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU KID? They're a buisiness NOT a fucking government agency. We have little to no power over
how they conduct buisiness. They don't even READ this group because of idiots like you that clog it up with senseless
repetitiveness.
[View Quote]

VOTE: ALL PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR AW READ

Apr 23, 2001, 11:00pm
I think it grows from bad experiences with newibes in Tribes 2 lately. Little fuckers... Flyin my bomber into a cliff after runnin
me over with it
[View Quote]

1  ...  3  4  5  6  7  8  ...  40  |  
Awportals.com is a privately held community resource website dedicated to Active Worlds.
Copyright (c) Mark Randall 2006 - 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Awportals.com   ·   ProLibraries Live   ·   Twitter   ·   LinkedIn