1  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  23  |   Order by default

May 9, 2004, 4:49pm

jetpacks could be done now with current stuff just a matter of adding it as
an object/avatar :-) jus get a seq when a user is flying flames shoot out,
if you want detachable ones then you'd need an update :-) but hey we can do
allot. 4.0 will have vehicles im told, chrispeg said to me that many
features users would want will be added then, 4.0 which is due out December
o4-first quarter 05 should be very good!
[View Quote]

May 9, 2004, 7:00pm

I have heard rumors of voice chat for AW, so heres an idea i would like to
see implemented...

If a user has this on their phon object "Create type=phone" it would makse
that obejct into a phone, by this i mean it would allwo users to call
eachother. to use it it would be a click on the phone thing and enter the
numebr you wish to call, phone numebrs would be citizen numebrs, then if the
user had a phone (determiend by ownership block, if not udner persons name
one coudl also add owner=cit #) it would call that given person, there would
be a sfx that played such as a phone determiend by op "phone.wav". this way
it would be liek having telephones in aw, and itd be sort of fun,

now you get to the problem of multiple phones well you coudl have extensions
else it woudl rign to al lphones udner that given name, onee a user picked
upthe phone it would automatically start a vocie chat session between users,
then it would be sort of fun sitting there talking, you could hang up the
phone by hitting the originating obejct again i guess.

and if perchanse they dont do it but they do vocie chat i guess a bot could
be used in place of this ey :-)

May 9, 2004, 11:24pm

click the phone :-) we could have payphones at gz :-) cal would goto
payphone so the given phone would ring :-)
[View Quote]

May 10, 2004, 5:36pm

glad to see everyone likes it i think it would be a bit mroe realistic than
just vocie chat, and itd be kind of fun, imagine answering machine bots!
they play ur voice XD or tell you who is/tryed to call(ing) you, nice way
we can screen out online calls too!

and with the phoen sound stored on op, i guess one can have themed phones,
in cofmeta you might have a cool futuristic phone, where in awteen,aw, and
some others we would use modern phones and cellphones :-)

0_0 and with video streaming one can also add nice pretty pictures like
webcams :-) (we can use webcams now with certain software but 100fps is
better than 1f/5s lol
[View Quote]

May 11, 2004, 4:40pm

if not have a sharing folder on each persons comp the way custom avatars
could be allowed also :-), and have the browser access
c:\Activeworlds\files\shared

and search for Ring.wav, or away.wav :-)
[View Quote]

May 18, 2004, 5:32pm

when I spoke to bill he said "everyone in aw can read it" I replied, nope no
one can read it unless their in beta, and within the beta ng when 3.6
testing started there was a post keep checking back beta people and in a
week we'll make a new post saying how to get into beta again. only beta
could see that so it was a chance for us to beta again, but then the next
day after that post boom we all lost posting 0_0
[View Quote]

Jun 2, 2004, 5:03pm

WOW 0_0 lol I think it should be 10 for 3 not 20...bots are useful...but 20
bucks for 3 more bots is 0_0
[View Quote]

Jun 9, 2004, 4:23pm

nah worlds could be bought just like they are now, just you add new
dimensions

P20

would have 40x40x40 cube (20 each direction, up, down, north, south, east,
west....its simple
[View Quote]

Jun 15, 2004, 7:02pm

When you buy a cit it says "Reserve a unique citizen name for your use." yet
when you go into any world, with tourist enabled, a tourist can use your
name, this becomes increasingly awkward in worlds with chatforwarding, or
chatbots. I think that when we buy cits we should get to keep our name, and
not let tourist be able to use them..

this is just my opinion, any comments?

Jun 15, 2004, 10:59pm

I mean more than once has a person gone to GZ of aw, or awteen claiming to
be me, saying all sorts of things like "my cit expired im leaving aw
forever", or "AWI canceled my cit" or "I hate you all I am leaving AW
forever, iv canceled my cit" or they cuss, its just not fun for me, to get
100 emails saying don't leave aw, or why'd u cuss out so and so at gz...its
horrible that they can do that...
[View Quote]

Jun 17, 2004, 8:36pm

yes but more so, its that awi says you are guaranteed that name, you say oh
they have quotes, and bots have [], well, those only demarcate status not
name...[=bot, "=tourist, just says what kind of account is being used,
rather than what name they are.

When im paying 7 a month for a service, and its promised to me, I want what
im supposed to get, and if someone can run around in my name as a tourist
its just bad, then you say well what if you expire, I GUARANTEE you will
tell at least one person that your expiring, majority of people when they
expire post to the ngs, or tell their friends, in which case you know
they'll be using a given tourist name. But for them to be able to use a
name, is not fair. Yes its not much harm done, but for what we're paying we
should want our services.
[View Quote]

Jun 21, 2004, 4:15pm

When a person blocks you I think the program shouldn't allow you to receive
grams from that person...until they unblock. I find it so annoying when a
person blocks you but keeps sending grams to you, and you end up with no
chance to rebute, I think that's the worst feeling in the world, I know I
could easily hit block all grams, but it should be a built in standard that
if a person blocks telegrams from you, that they in turn should NOT be able
to send them to you.

Jun 23, 2004, 12:42pm

hurmmm well that's some stuff to fix after heh, we need the system first, I
understand fully, but I think that if the counterblock mechanism is
initiated then user A couldn't unblock that person for a set amount of time,
like put at least 1 minute to it...or maybe do blocks per session, have an
option for a temporary block? and when the users Both log off the block is
inactivated??
[View Quote]

Jun 25, 2004, 1:32am

in truth there isn't ONE person in aw I have ever blocked....I don't use the
feature, but I find it so darn annoying that a person can block me and then
send ME grams...making it a one way transaction
[View Quote]

Jun 25, 2004, 3:14pm

then you get spammed with request....or are you talking only when they block
you? and once you refuse it refuses them all?
[View Quote]

Jul 7, 2004, 10:49am

(psssst talking bout create rotate command here not building rotate)
[View Quote]

Jul 9, 2004, 3:28am

thanks for the help, but is this thing safe? has anyone checked it? are
there any viruses? or other bad things in it?
[View Quote]

Jul 9, 2004, 3:44am

Ok thanks :-) I also scanned with Norton 10 times so I hope this isn't a
very good put on
[View Quote]

Jul 16, 2004, 2:07am

aw should use esrb cuz its a videogame, but the system now works fine too :)
its not the american rating system though just movies :)

G -everyone
PG -Parental guidance
PG-13 -parental guidance and/or age of thirteen
R -Restricted
NC-17 -Adult
X -Pornographic

thats the breakdown pretty much, the ratings are given by content, G is like
Disney films, PG is like comedies for children with some vulgarity, pg-13 is
a little more graphic with maybe some language, or MILD sexual themes. R is
adults because of language, sexuality, nudity, and extreme violence. NC-17
is R to a greater extent with mild pornographic scenes. X is straight out
sex and porn.

http://www.mpaa.org
http://www.mpaa.org/movieratings/


[View Quote]

Jul 20, 2004, 4:15pm

nope :) untrue the rating system aw uses is strictly for movies, and the
internet has no laws as stated :) well then again if there is porno it must
be stated prior to, :) 18+ law but other than that and the no child porno
rule, and no hacking etc etc, the internet has no laws, because its NOT
owned by the USA, :)
[View Quote]

Jul 25, 2004, 3:04pm

I think aw needs to have a history :) like internet explorer, have it so it
stores where we go this would be good for many reasons, those of us with
Alzheimer's who cant remember where our builds are, those of us who are
parents and want to see where our children go, and those of us who forgot to
remember builds :)

Jul 26, 2004, 1:10am

no it isn't...did you even read my post :)

"and those of us who forgot to remember builds :)"

:) read carefully
[View Quote]

Jul 26, 2004, 1:17am

heh
not a huge rewrite

I think aw should add to it, :) make a new type of citizen :) called group
and just write for specified group, this would add a voting thing probably
or approvals, and the purchaser of the citizen could set certain attributes
such as;
Majority rule:would make it so majority of users added to the citizen rights
list for the group cit, would need to say yes on the poll for it to be
given.

or maybe aw should add a guild system??? :) Gaiaonline just added a guild
system and it could be incorporated to aw easily, and itd be very neat too.
this could use the above mentioned things, as well as group forums,
membership fees? so inside of aw people could start things where to belong
its 5 dollars a month, and this could allow for citizens to be added as
administrators, and a hierarchy system could be added

idk it was spur of the moment :)
[View Quote]

Jul 26, 2004, 1:23am

not complete...just an addon needed. completerewrite wouldmean not
incorporating current building... you could add this new account type to get
rid of the need for destroying old account type :)
[View Quote]

Jul 26, 2004, 4:10am

id love to have that :) or if not we need some light switches that stay on
until their turned off eh??
[View Quote]

Jul 26, 2004, 3:39pm

ummm no we don't already have it...that's a lightswitch for you.and just
you..and plus that's not even what I was saying :)
[View Quote]

Jul 26, 2004, 10:03pm

nooooooo that's not even close to my first request LOL

the switch is user only :) when I turn on a light in r/l it turns on for
everyone :) that's what I said first [post, second post, and again in this
one....and before you go off mentioning bots, or how it would take whole
script rewrites, this is the wish...not the plausibility control wish list
[View Quote]

Jul 27, 2004, 2:38am

"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"

yeah I never said that...

"light switches that stay on until their turned off eh??"

that implies a global light command... for permanent lighting... your
solution would be as long as obj is in range...


now shush before you yell at someone with ignorance...
[View Quote]

Jul 27, 2004, 6:03pm

no you didn't read

this has no implications, it flat out says it eep, now stop being a jerk,
your not always right, and your arrogance and persistent fighting makes you
come off as snobby, mean, and pushy.

"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"
"that's a lightswitch for you.and just you"

and a thousand times more, I said it, and you didn't read it.
[View Quote]

Jul 28, 2004, 12:54am

hah just like a bitch.

no need to be so mean, YOU misunderstood, at the time I worded it fine, now
I worded it fine, tommorow it will still be worded the same, id have to add
even more words to say that the lightswitch only works when you make
it...and no your lightswitch is NOT a solution, and im the one who CAN make
a lightswitch, you just don't know how to stay on topic.

this ends here

lest we digress from the original topic beyond recognition, for as iv seen
on several other post this is precedent with you. you stray so far off the
original topic, the post's updates become negligible to the original
meaning.
[View Quote]

1  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  23  |   Order by default