|
zeofatex // User Search
zeofatex // User Search
Aug 31, 2004, 3:22pm
LOL!
Nice one Enzo ;P
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:4134b1b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I hate the Hamptons...
>
>
> E
>
>
> "c p" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:412e2386 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> with
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,64717,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_7
>
>
|
Aug 31, 2004, 12:08am
I'm in F.I.R.S.T (http://www.usfirst.org/) club in my high school.
(Robot Competitions -- cool shit)
sounds cool but dunno what I could help with.=\
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:4133d7df at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hey, just wondering, anyone here interested in robotics? wanna start a
> robotics world, was thinking like a robot wars type game, and some amature
> robotics tutorials and guides to electronic engineering, and emm, tools,
and
> stuff like that. Just started trying to build robots, and find it very
> interested, and the course i'm taking in university (stating in about 20
> days) is pretty much the same, well, guess that doens't have anything to
do
> with anything, but just wanna start a world with tutorials on robotics,
and
> emm, a game, and where people can show thier own projects and how they did
> it and all, sorta a robotics community i guess ^_^ so, anyone interested
in
> helping? :)
> oh, and got to making a little robot wars typa objects in the world
> Robotics (just a trial homepage right now), not much there yet though.
>
>
|
Aug 31, 2004, 12:37am
Yep =)
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:4133dffe at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well, could just share your experience with others? :)
>
> -SWE
>
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4133ddae$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> amature
tools,
20
to
robotics,
> did
interested
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2004, 1:24am
That's pretty cool. Looks more like a missile to me. As for the glass
though, it's all bulletproof shit there...
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:41352de2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> http://www.muchosucko.com/flash/pentagonlies.html#Main
>
> That video.. Is not a prank. Let the music not make you think it is a
prank.
> There are some metal music but to relate to the flash. So keep your sound
> very low but at some parts, turn them up a little.
>
> I found this VERY interesting. It may not relate to the community
> newsgroups, but i'm sure some of you are very interested in mysterious
type
> of things like this. I am. And found this a very informative flash.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 6:15pm
My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was so
that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans -- their
exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up and
evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
possible to. :)
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ya, but what ferr is saying, is that they reported that a 757 crashed
> through, no 747 :)
>
> -SWE
>
> "themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
> news:4138c022$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> huge
if
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 6:15pm
Err well than again that leaves us to wonder where the hell the plane is...
(Sorry for double-post)
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was
so
> that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
> military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans --
their
> exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
> shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up
and
> evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
> possible to. :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
stuff
> if
:P
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 10:19am
Well the first two planes no-one had any idea were going into the WTCs...
but the other ones they could have done something about.
[View Quote]"ubermonkey" <ubermonkey at wcalliance.com> wrote in message
news:41398989$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> IMO the real conspiracy here is why *weren't* the planes shot down? I
don't
> care how bad that looks to the public, or how inhuman this may sound; when
a
> potentially destructive vehicle of that sort is taken captive it is only
> logical to neutralize it. Had the planes simply been shot down, the death
> totals would have been in the hundreds instead of thousands. No one can
> argue (well, you can if you want, but you'll just look silly) that the
scale
> of the tragedy hasn't been a factor in pushing us to war, which, for the
> military sector of the economy, is a blessing. And don't tell me there
> wasn't time to react, that's total BS. You know the instant a plane is off
> its flight path. You contact them, then send military escort/intercept if
> there's no response.
>
> Our Airforce cannot possibly be *that* inept, can they? Either the
military
> is so incompetent they wouldn't effectively fend off an attack by a
crippled
> 95 year old Nazi air commander flying an antique 1940's bomber loaded with
> surplus soviet nukes, or they were ordered to allow those planes to hit
> their targets. If the first is true, be vary scared, because anyone with a
> few million dollars could kill us all tomorrow, and as such at least be
> thankful someone exposed our terrible weakness without dropping "the bomb"
> in the process. If the second, be equally scared, because your government
> could allow you to be killed tomorrow as a martyr without your consent. If
> there's a third option here, I don't see it, and I don't count "but we
> couldn't shoot down our own planes." This isn't conspiracy theory, this is
> logic. If I'm wrong, then prove me wrong *logically.*
>
> Anyone?
>
> "themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
> news:41352de2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> prank.
sound
> type
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 3:47pm
Most of the time when someone takes over a plane they don't go crashing them
into buildings...
[View Quote]"c p" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4139fdd3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that's what the govt says...
>
> BUT thinkabout it our billions of dollars going into military and
> intelligence.. we have radars, that can tell us, as well as other ways to
> know that those planes where offcourse...and also flying too low!
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4139b2e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
WTCs...
only
death
the
if
with
government
mysterious
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2004, 11:13am
Gmail invites. Beta test for Google... 1 gig inbox.
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4135c14f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Invites, what kinda invites? LOL ... oh, and I'm from ActiveWorlds :o}
>
> Lady NightHawk
>
>
>
> --
>
> "ry" <rbirkin at iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> news:4135b569 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 5, 2004, 11:40pm
That was an old bug in AW too o_O
[View Quote]"builderz" <contact at 3dhost.net> wrote in message
news:413b9e4f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I haven't tried sending a telegram with a long URL yet, but if you want
> to make a URL shorter, try this site:
>
> http://tinyurl.com
>
> Builderz
>
> ferruccio wrote:
http://www.argos.co.uk/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?PID=1112697&catalogId=2501¶ms=100x100generic&productId=109777&referredURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.argos.co.uk%2Fwebapp%2Fwcs%2Fstores%2Fservlet%2FArgosCreateReferral%3FstoreId%3D10001%26langId%3D-1%26referrer%3DCOJUN%26params%3Dadref%253DPersonal+care-%3EElectric+toothbrushes%26referredURL%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.argos.co.uk%2Fwebapp%2Fwcs%2Fstores%2Fservlet%2FProductDisplay%253FstoreId%253D10001%2526catalogId%253D2501%2526productId%253D109777%2526langId%253D-1&langId=-1&referrer=COJUN&AID=10294381&storeId=10001
|
Sep 7, 2004, 8:42am
Who the hell expected monster links like that though...
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:413d6e22 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Or could be someone didnt give enough memory into the URL buffer.
>
> - MR
>
> "ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:413d4cb0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
so
>
>
|
Sep 6, 2004, 2:56pm
What's that program that takes all things inside a folder and outputs a list
of their filenames to a text file?
Thanks!
Zeo
Sep 6, 2004, 5:36pm
Thanks tony and Alpha :)
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabitphalpha at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:413ca9f0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Listmaker is one.
> http://www.nwlink.com/~koolguy/home.html
>
>
a
> list of their filenames to a text file?
>
>
|
Sep 6, 2004, 7:15pm
Actually I could use a thumbnail prog lol...
Glad you thought of it. rofl
Thanks bit!
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabitphalpha at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:413cbe1c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Your'e very welcome:)
> Listmaker will make a list of all jpgs etc.
> There are also some free proggys out there that will make instant
thumbnails
> webpages for you.
> As soon as I figure out what I did to the server again, I'll try and find
> them...lol
>
>
>
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:413cbc31$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 6, 2004, 10:52pm
Can someone compile it for me. I don't have all that crap installed that you
need to compile it.
Thanks,
ZeoFateX
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabitphalpha at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:413cefce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *Thwack*
> :)
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:413cec06 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 7, 2004, 8:41am
Not sure I have perl installed... at _ at
[View Quote]"johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:413d8deb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> O_o it appears to be a perl script for websites.
>
> John
>
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:413d064f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you
>
>
|
Sep 6, 2004, 7:37pm
Just wanted to show you all a really good website host figured some of you
might be interested. I do realise I shouldn't be doing this but their deal
is so good they look like they're going out of buisness. I've been using
this place for a year or two now, no outages and the admins are good. It's
like $4 a month for 2 gigs of space, unlimited MySQL, 60 gigs of bandwidth,
etc.
http://www.ace-host.net/specialplan.html
http://www.ace-host.net
Sorry for doing this but I really like the host and I don't know what I'd do
without them lol...
Sep 8, 2004, 8:08pm
http://www.phpwebhosting.com/faq.html
yeah...
"
Q. Are there any other general restrictions?
A. In general we do not allow sites whose primary purpose is file downloads
or transfer. We must have this restriction to ensure that all users receive
fast, dependable service. Transfer only sites put an undue burden on our
servers.
Q. You say that transfer is unmetered, but is there any limit to the amount
I can use?
A. Though we do not have any pre-set limits, you will receive warnings if
your site begins to use over 25 GB of bandwidth/month. If you use more than
this occasionally that is fine. There is never an extra fee for bandwidth
overages. Our policies are different from a lot of other hosts who place
strict limits on accounts. We have been hosting sites for over five years
with our current policies and have not had problems. We feel that our lack
of a pre-set limit is a good compromise between hosts that have strict
bandwidth limits/fees and hosts that have no limits at all. Hosts that claim
to have no limits at all are simply lying or are very new to the hosting
business. So called "unlimited" hosting does not work in the long term.
We feel that our approach is much better. It allows our clients to not worry
about overage fees but also know that their site will always be fast.
Note : sites hosting illegal files, porn, warez, file archives or other
"download-only" sites are not accepted.
We also reserve the right to ask any site to leave that is under the
bandwidth limits but is putting a heavy load on the servers. The bottom line
is this : we monitor our servers carefully. It is very important that every
client has a fast, responsive website. If your scripts are causing resource
problems (too much CPU or Disk I/O usage for example) we may have to ask you
to leave. This is seldom a problem but we do want to make sure we are
upfront about this.
The main point of our "un-metered" policy is to allow us to have a friendly
service where you do not need to always be worried about incurring extra
fees by going over pre-set limits. "
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:413f7503$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That would be abused so much, unless it has a nice strict policy.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:413dddd3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> like
> etc..)
of
their
> using
good.
what
>
>
|
Sep 8, 2004, 8:08pm
"
Q. You say "un-metered" POP3 accounts. How many can I really have?
A. A general limit would be 100 to 150. The main limits are that you can not
for instance set up a service where anybody on the net can get a free POP3
through you, etc. The goal of the un-metered POP3's is to allow you to set
up however many are needed for your company, group, etc. Like most of our
other offerings, we do not want to place any hard limits on the number of
POP3's that you may create. However we do ask that you keep your demands
within reason. Also keep in mind the number of messages that each account
will be receiving each day. For example, 150 POP3's that only receive a few
messages a day would be acceptable while 150 POP3's that each receive
thousands of messages a day would not.
"
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:413f7503$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That would be abused so much, unless it has a nice strict policy.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:413dddd3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> like
> etc..)
of
their
> using
good.
what
>
>
|
Sep 9, 2004, 9:21pm
Of course than you see ace-host's offer... The special...
[View Quote]"mike zimmer" <remmiz at remmiz.com> wrote in message
news:4140dfa6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I am going to have to agree with Robbie. I have been with phpwebhosting
for
> a while now and haven't had a better host. Their support is top notch, and
> their prices are to die for.
>
> -Miek Zimmer
> Mike*
>
> "robbie" <robbie at oriox.com> wrote in message
> news:4140dc1f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
than
> for
my
you
> free
you
> to
> of
> number
> receive
> receive
policy.
ftp,
> figured
this
> I've
admins
> gigs
don't
>
>
|
Sep 7, 2004, 10:22pm
Are you inferring that we're all a bunch of asses?
lol, interesting stuff to read Xelag :P
(j/k about the inference part)
[View Quote]"xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
news:4iisj011to0svfb5hfauu7l7k3b4ivlou6 at 4ax.com...
> http://www.kynd.net/~tralchem/toilet.html
>
> On 7 Sep 2004 19:53:56 -0400, "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote:
>
>
|
Sep 9, 2004, 1:03am
Or your ISP. My ISP blocks port 80 inbound...
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <alphabitphalpha at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:413fbfd4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thanks Richard:)
> I installed Webweaver after uninstalling Apache.
> Neither server seems to be able to get out.
> It might be in my router settings which I'm working on now.
> I'm about ready to throw this pc in the trash:)
> Thanks again!
> Bit:)
>
>
|
Sep 9, 2004, 1:04am
BTW which brand router?
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:413fc81c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Or your ISP. My ISP blocks port 80 inbound...
>
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabitphalpha at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:413fbfd4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 9, 2004, 8:52am
I find that it's one year though which would make me think that they will
bring in maybe a thousand users on the free thing, and than next year they
will make them pay for the domain. Sounds like a gimmic at _ at
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:414023a5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've got about 50 reserved for myself. :)
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> "ry" <rbirkin at iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> news:41400777 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> :)
>
>
|
Sep 14, 2004, 12:31am
Just as an analogy kind of:
I am a lifetime cit in There (who could give up the opportunity lol). There
has voice chat but to tell you the truth, a majority of users do not use it
at all. I have it and I almost never use it... and neither do any of my
friends who have it enabled as well...\
-Z
[View Quote]"lioness." <nobody at nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:41465597 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Usually with voice chat, you select the individuals you want to voice chat
> with. Of course there are tons of programs one can use, but I would
imagine
> AW can't afford the more expensive ones which are packed with options and
> therefore we'd be using a cheaper version for a while which would only
allow
> us to select 1 person at a time to voice chat with as opposed to a
> "conference call" type of thing. I highly doubt we'd be listening to
dozens
> of people all talking at once.
>
>
> "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:4145eb1b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
probably
as
a
Active
ability
is
am
to
enable
how
you
them
>
>
|
Sep 16, 2004, 1:16pm
Yeah it is...
[View Quote]"rossyboy" <rossyboy at vwtv.org> wrote in message
news:4149aacc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No, it IS actually sine and cosine.
>
> c p wrote:
which
talboid!)
get
"appealing"!
|
Sep 17, 2004, 12:16pm
If I remember correctly from that article There made one of the programs. I
was going to post this yesterday but I figured no-one would really care that
much lol...
[View Quote]"builderz" <contact at 3dhost.net> wrote in message
news:414a7ba0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "For most of the millions of people around the world who regularly use
> instant messaging, the communications tool has largely been a text-only
> experience in which typed emoticons offer only minimal clues to
> someone's state of mind.
>
> The recent launch of two services -- a brand new, fully
> three-dimensional chat-room product known as IMVU, and AOL Instant
> Messenger's new 3-D SuperBuddy icons -- is putting the spotlight on a
> major shift by the leading IM providers toward making graphical avatars
> a fundamental personalization feature."
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64969,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
>
> Builderz
|
Sep 19, 2004, 8:11pm
I got two right also W00T!
[View Quote]"c p" <Chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:414dfa26$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I got them all :)
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit2003 at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:414de004$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 22, 2004, 8:58am
Doesn't mac have an internet explorer of it's own though?
[View Quote]"alexthemartian" <alexthemartian at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:41515667 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yep, and "EclipseCrossword is a free product for Microsoft Windows"... and
> on
http://www.greeneclipsesoftware.com/eclipsecrossword/tutorialapplet.html
> they have "Don't have a website? Click here to get started" links to
> http://search.msn.com/results.asp?q=free+homepage i think EclipseCrossword
> <3 Microsoft
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:41512810 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
find
Microsoft....
Windows
>
>
|
Sep 25, 2004, 11:10pm
Well I guess you're wrong. Seeing as I produced the hurricane.
I'm not insane. 8D
[View Quote]"ryan" <ryan at example.com> wrote in message
news:4155f90f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hurricane Ivan did not take that path. It hit Gulf Shores, AL.
>
> Besides which, I strongly believe there's no connection. Thinking that
> people are causing hurricanes is just schizophrenic, insane, and
> irrational thinking.
>
> Ryan
>
> builderz wrote:
me.
|
|