|
Instant Messaging Goes Graphical (Community)
Instant Messaging Goes Graphical // Community
Sep 17, 2004, 3:52am
"For most of the millions of people around the world who regularly use
instant messaging, the communications tool has largely been a text-only
experience in which typed emoticons offer only minimal clues to
someone's state of mind.
The recent launch of two services -- a brand new, fully
three-dimensional chat-room product known as IMVU, and AOL Instant
Messenger's new 3-D SuperBuddy icons -- is putting the spotlight on a
major shift by the leading IM providers toward making graphical avatars
a fundamental personalization feature."
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64969,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
Builderz
Sep 17, 2004, 12:16pm
If I remember correctly from that article There made one of the programs. I
was going to post this yesterday but I figured no-one would really care that
much lol...
[View Quote]"builderz" <contact at 3dhost.net> wrote in message
news:414a7ba0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "For most of the millions of people around the world who regularly use
> instant messaging, the communications tool has largely been a text-only
> experience in which typed emoticons offer only minimal clues to
> someone's state of mind.
>
> The recent launch of two services -- a brand new, fully
> three-dimensional chat-room product known as IMVU, and AOL Instant
> Messenger's new 3-D SuperBuddy icons -- is putting the spotlight on a
> major shift by the leading IM providers toward making graphical avatars
> a fundamental personalization feature."
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64969,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
>
> Builderz
|
Sep 17, 2004, 6:01pm
I care if it's still gonna be free! That's (free) the one great thing about
IMs, for which I seldom use em cause I love the graphical *eye candy*. But
hey, if they remain free and go graphical that would rock! Would also put a
few of those makin money outa biz...
LNH
--
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:414af1d7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If I remember correctly from that article There made one of the programs.
I
> was going to post this yesterday but I figured no-one would really care
that
> much lol...
>
> "builderz" <contact at 3dhost.net> wrote in message
> news:414a7ba0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64969,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
>
>
|
Sep 17, 2004, 6:07pm
extra avatars cost $2,500 ???
-Lightwave
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:414b4299$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I care if it's still gonna be free! That's (free) the one great thing
about
> IMs, for which I seldom use em cause I love the graphical *eye candy*. But
> hey, if they remain free and go graphical that would rock! Would also put
a
> few of those makin money outa biz...
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> --
>
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:414af1d7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
programs.
> I
> that
text-only
avatars
> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64969,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
>
>
|
Sep 28, 2004, 6:29pm
I know the AIM superbuddy things are like $6 a month.....at least according
to an article I read about them in some magazine (PopSci I think it was...)
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:414b4299$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>I care if it's still gonna be free! That's (free) the one great thing about
> IMs, for which I seldom use em cause I love the graphical *eye candy*. But
> hey, if they remain free and go graphical that would rock! Would also put
> a
> few of those makin money outa biz...
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> --
>
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:414af1d7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I
> that
> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64969,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
>
>
|
|