|
|
binarybud // User Search
binarybud // User Search
Jun 30, 2003, 1:37pm
this is easy to solve Iggy.....if you don;'t like it don't go to the Gate....stay away from there...you obviously do not need help with AW...and your not there to help others...why do you go there?
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BB262FAB.8AA%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article BB262DF9.8A6%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com, iggythealleycat at
> arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com wrote on 6/30/03 6:16 PM:
>
> also i want to say
> and sory for double postings,
> that i feel there is a cliuge in the gate,
> of some gatekeepers which i wont say their names,
> as i said,i feel, they pick on people they don't like and let their friends
> do what ever they want.
> i feel the pick on me.
> so for them i am a trouble maker.
> i want to know which of the GK ever even read the F.A.Q of aw so he could
> help more newbies with differant problems ?
> they only read what people think of them insted of beeing good at their
> work.
> and after you asumed i am a truble maker i allow myself to asume that after
> they read what people think of them they send their friends to defend them
> so it wont look silly.
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:41pm
YES absolutely they need eject. What are you afraid of? "THE GATE IS FOR NEWBIES AND THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HELP THEM"..... If your not one of these people then what are you doing there?. :)
Leo :)
Only troublemakers/rude/crude people get ejected.
[View Quote]"weizer" <guillaume.soucis at vl.videotron.ca> wrote in message news:3f0052fa$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I think the best way to prevent these ejections is to give the gatekeepers
> only the PS right. Then, if there's a trouble maker, they just need to call
> a PK. Do they really need the eject right ?
>
> -Weizer
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
> news: BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> productive
> which,
> and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:50pm
I know that..... but the GATE is not for you to harass people nor start debates. Go there if you want to help people.....or lurk.....but not to unsettle the atmosphere.
An if your chat post was in fact all the chat...then, no, it does not look like they were justified for ejecting you for sure....but ....you muted the gatekeeper...so you do not have a leg to stand on.....If i was in charge of an area(AW or not) and I was being ignored you'd get ejected also..:) Don't buck the system so much.
I'm not arguing that there are bad GK's just that I do not think your a good example either.
Leo :)
Sorry if I smile a lot I'm just that way in real life to ... I always smile even in a good fight..:) keeps 'em off guard..:)
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BB2633BC.8B5%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article 3f00592f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
> leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 6:37 PM:
> bud,
> please read my first thing i wrote
> as i said AW is empty in some hours,
> that's the reason i am at the gate :)
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:52pm
"doesn't like" or "doesn't like harassed by them"
I have MY opinion on this already duh...:)
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BB263463.8B7%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article 3f005a20$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
> leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 6:41 PM:
> please do try and read
> not Only troublemakers/rude/crude people get ejected also people the GK's
> doesn't liek.
> :))
>
>
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:56pm
most fall into the "troublemaker" category yes you ARE right...every now and then an innocent gets ejected...I've been ejected a bunch of times....usually the bot does it..... learn to live with that..... learn the rules of the gate then tell me it was innocent people being ejected... if your innocent then you understand why it happened...if not well....shit happens..:)
<bot trys to eject BB for saying "shit">
Leo :)
[View Quote]"weizer" <guillaume.soucis at vl.videotron.ca> wrote in message news:3f005b4c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Afaik, not only troublemakers/rude/crude people get ejected. Just look at
> the number of posts about it.
>
> -Weizer
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 3f005a20$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> FOR NEWBIES AND THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HELP THEM"..... If your not one of
> these people then what are you doing there?. :)
> news:3f0052fa$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> gatekeepers
> call
> de
> like,
> the
> saying
> of
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:07pm
..duo., Your about as wrong as I was when I first read this...:) I'd be the first one to scream bloody murder on a bad GK...in fact I've about had it with the GK Management......they leave the GK's out to dry way to many times. and are actually the reason the organization is faltering...IMO. I buck the system when it needs it.....but not at others expense. IMO Iggy should have left the Gate when he did not like what Vermin was saying, not sit there and make an issue out of it. Email is your friend and it's a "paper trail" when you need it.
Leo
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f006cb1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Right, and the GKs should've stopped the person harrassing iggy. That's
> iggy's point! Iggy probably does not harrass people or start debates, which
> is why he is debating HERE. Iggy said he (or she) goes there to chat, and
> never even said the she (or he) unsettles the atmosphere. Being ignored is
> no reason to eject someone! That's the worst justification I've EVER heard.
> Why not buck the system? If no one bucked the system, then we'd all be
> opressed, and there would still be all kinds of horrible things like racism
> and no free speech. Conforming is the worst thing you can ever do, so why
> don't you buck the system once in a while?
>
> The reason you refuse to believe iggy is because you know he (or she) is NOT
> lying, but your friends with a lot of the GKs so you don't WANT to believe
> about them.
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f005c34$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> start debates. Go there if you want to help people.....or lurk.....but not
> to unsettle the atmosphere.
> like they were justified for ejecting you for sure....but ....you muted the
> gatekeeper...so you do not have a leg to stand on.....If i was in charge of
> an area(AW or not) and I was being ignored you'd get ejected also..:)
> Don't buck the system so much.
> good example either.
> smile even in a good fight..:) keeps 'em off guard..:)
> news:BB2633BC.8B5%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> AW...and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:19pm
I'm only nasty when I need to be.....don't harass me and the people I'm with and you won't see me nasty...:)
Look at my freak'in name dude.....I'm everyone's "Bud"....at least that's how I start out....unless you piss on me then I piss on you...:)
And BTW I read every word of your post and pondered it fairly...:)
Leo
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f006beb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You tend to be nasty, but your buddy-buddy with the GKs so they don't do
> anything about it.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f0052d0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> times....you do not like authority figures..I've seen you in action at the
> gate......:)
> news:3f0050ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry to
> like,
> kellie
> the
> lives
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:37pm
..duo. bite me hows that for nasty.......<BB unloads another truck full of fense post for Duo to argue with.>
I've had it with your lame ass post's also....learn to conform (thats how society works) if you have a complaint, lodge it through the proper channels........do not go to the gate and harass gatekeepers....thats not how it works.....if you don;t like being ejected then don;'t do ejectable things at the gate...;) very simple... sorry you can't understand that.
OH and please name all the Gatekeepers I am close friends with....:) Please..... I await your response to this.
Leo :)
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f006e9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Simple. Ignorign is not against any rule, so they have NO right to eject
> iggy. Simple as that. The GKs being in charge isn't a rule. AW could shut
> them down if they wanted, and put someone else in charge, it isn't definate.
> The GKs are in charge to keep order, even if they don't always do the best
> job. They aren't there to eject people because they dislike them. In fact I
> remember hearing that GKs aren't ALOUD to do anything to someone because
> they wronged a GK. YOU want people in charge who are corrupt and don't eject
> YOU because their your friends, and YOU have no feeling, understanding, or
> sympathy for anyone who is NOT friends with the GKs. Technically Iggy or I
> would probably make better GKs because we don't wrong people like that. The
> gate might be a little disorderly, but sometimes people feeling comfortable
> is more important.
>
> STOP BEING NASTY, IT HURTS PEOPLE'S FEELINGS!!! I think I've had it with
> your posts, if you continue beign a jerk I'll ask enzo to tell you to be
> nicer or delete your posts since you REFUSE to be kind.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f005222 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> How do you know they did not eject you after trying to communicate with you,
> and you kept "ignoring" them? Ya know one basic rule at the Gate you
> seem to over look....The GK's are in charge whether you like it or not.
> And it has to be that way. WHY? Because we don't want people like YOU in
> charge. :)
> news:BB26260C.89B%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> And i
> Gate..:)
> Active
> Setting
> reducing your
> Guidelines
> Guidelines
> tabacco
> revolution.
> it out
> jew
> the
> again?
> and
> an
> starts
> click on
> starts
> it
> the
> some
> right you
> ...........{{{{{{{{{{{{{Nutski}}}}}}}}}}} :}
> rights....what do u
> when ppl
> Sorry to
> like,
> productive
> kellie
> the
> saying
> lives of
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:45am
not sure on the "plenty of them" but I would tend to agree.
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f00ef1d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There, a good argument. The GK management may be the reason certain GKs are
> bad (or have gone bad) and are still there, and that would be the cause.
> However, I was just arguing that there are bad GKs, and plenty of them.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f006e66$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the first one to scream bloody murder on a bad GK...in fact I've about had
> it with the GK Management......they leave the GK's out to dry way to many
> times. and are actually the reason the organization is faltering...IMO.
> I buck the system when it needs it.....but not at others expense. IMO Iggy
> should have left the Gate when he did not like what Vermin was saying, not
> sit there and make an issue out of it. Email is your friend and it's a
> "paper trail" when you need it.
> news:3f006cb1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> which
> and
> is
> heard.
> racism
> why
> NOT
> believe
> not
> look
> the
> of
> your a
> always
> the
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:52am
Are you feeding the flames right now? Explain to us all why you feel the need to chastize me? In public?
[View Quote]"lord perception" <usenetreplies at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3f00b83f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> <snipped>
>
> Look, since there are lack of places to chat these days. It would probably
> be wise if someone could set up and maintain a register of when people are
> available to come on and then people get together at AlphaWorld GZ or some
> other place at pre scheduled times.
>
> The AWGate, really in my view was primarily a place for newbies to get
> accustomed to using the software, not really a place for full on chat about
> anything.
>
> And BinaryBud, Are you able to refrain from constantly feeding the flames in
> these NG's... Please?
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 10:55am
As you yourself would do to those GK's So what is it? A Personal conflict? So leave the GK's as a group out of this and instead lets name some names.....I'm all for cleaning things up....but it's NOT the GK's as a group...... it's a personal thing...some of them do have to go.
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f00efe9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No, but some GKs are really bad enough to eject people simply out of
> dislike.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f005cd1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:BB263463.8B7%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> GK's
> IS FOR
> of these
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 6:34pm
Pretty slick looking site ya got there...;)
who be you?
[View Quote]"awgate" <community at awgate.com> wrote in message news:3f01ecdb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hello -
>
> this is a personally created and run ad campaign by awgate.com, awgate.com's
> looking for aw related websites to promote this campaign. this is public and
> can be used freely by any website...they are standard web size
> banners(468x60)... for more information take a look at
> http://awgate.com/adclick/RenewYourself/ - it's simple, it's easy, hope you
> website owners will participate. :) thanks
>
> not affiliated with awi.
>
>
|
Jul 2, 2003, 4:33pm
click this one:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K2B521125
Leo :)
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f031e0e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> "pc hamster" <pchamster at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f02aaa2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> HOWEVER
>
> After EXTENSIVE searching on Google, I found a cached version of the
> ActiveWorlds TV Directory at
> http://216.239.53.100/search?q=cache:QlxR1UumfRIJ:awtaz.net/ctv/website/stat
> ion/+XEON-TV&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 (apologies if this isn't clickable) and have
> signed the following stations in the Hamsterville area onto the following
> networks...
>
>
> This station is now with DFTV.
>
>
> This station is now an AIR-TV affiliate.
>
> nearby
>
> This station is now with VWTV.
>
>
> This station is now a CTV affiliate.
>
>
> This station is now with the (currently) almighty XEON-TV.
>
> If I need to complete affiliation forms, I will do so at the earliest
> possible convience (sp?).
>
> I would suggest people BOOKMARK the above URL as I don't know how long
> Google will keep this page. Once again, the URL for VRTV Networks (for
> those who need it) is as follows....
>
> http://216.239.53.100/search?q=cache:QlxR1UumfRIJ:awtaz.net/ctv/website/stat
> ion/+XEON-TV&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 6/18/2003
>
>
|
Jul 8, 2003, 2:38pm
No offense, but I could'nt care less about YOU maki...... why you mouthing
off about this?
Did ole Mr Bruce make maki feel bad? awwwwwww poor baby.
[View Quote]"maki" <multi.forum.274950.maki at awgate.com> wrote in message
news:3f067586 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "mrbruce" <A1CTWorld at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:3f05faec$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
>
> no offense, but i personally would never allow you to cover the cost of
> anything of mine.
>
> maki
>
>
|
Jul 16, 2003, 5:33pm
LOL SWE your in Libya, Right? LOL your using AW illegally!!! :)
Read This Section:
"EXPORT CONTROLS. None of the Software, AW Software or underlying
information or technology may be downloaded or otherwise exported or
re-exported (i) into (or to a national or resident of) Cuba, Iraq, Libya,
Yugoslavia, North Korea, Iran, Syria or any other country to which the U.S.
has embargoed goods; or (ii) into any country in which the U.S. has
embargoed goods, or to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department's list of
Specially Designated Nationals or the U.S. Commerce Department's Table of
Deny Orders. By downloading or using the Software, you are agreeing to the
foregoing and you are representing and warranting that you are not located
in, under the control of, or a national or resident of any such country or
on any such list."
Leo :)
[View Quote]"r i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:3f158afd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Inside the AW Installation or right here:
>
> ACTIVE WORLDS BROWSER END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
>
> BY CLICKING ON THE "NEXT" BUTTON, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO BE BOUND BY AND ARE
> BECOMING A PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS
> OF THIS AGREEMENT, CLICK THE "CANCEL" BUTTON AND THE INSTALLATION PROCESS
> WILL NOT CONTINUE. IF THESE TERMS ARE CONSIDERED AN OFFER, ACCEPTANCE IS
> EXPRESSLY LIMITED TO THESE TERMS.
>
> GRANT. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Activeworlds.com, Inc.
> ("AWCOM") hereby grants you a limited, personal, nontransferable,
> nonsublicensable, royalty-free, nonexclusive license to use one copy of the
> client software product you are about to install in object code form
> ("Software") for the purpose of accessing the Active Worlds server and using
> the Active Worlds software resident thereon ("AW Software").
>
> You may: copy the Software for archival purposes, provided any copy must
> contain all of the original Software's proprietary notices; you may use the
> AW Software subject to the terms and conditions of this license.
>
> You may not, directly or indirectly: modify, translate, reverse engineer,
> decompile, disassemble (except to the extent applicable laws specifically
> prohibit such restriction), create derivative works based on, or otherwise
> attempt to discover the source code or underlying ideas or algorithms of the
> Software or AW Software; or copy (except for archival purposes as set forth
> above), rent, lease, distribute, transfer or otherwise transfer rights to
> the Software or AW Software; use the Software or AW Software for timesharing
> or service bureau purposes; or remove any proprietary notices or labels on
> the Software or AW Software.
>
> SOFTWARE. This license does not grant you any right to any enhancement or
> update. Furthermore, this license does not grant you continued access to AW
> Software.
>
> SUPPORT. This Agreement does not entitle you to any maintenance, upgrades,
> patches, enhancements, fixes, new versions or other support ("Support
> Programs") for the Software or AW Software; provided, however, that if you
> download or otherwise obtain in any manner any Support Programs they shall
> become part of the Software and the terms of this Agreement shall apply.
>
> TITLE. As between the parties, title, ownership rights, and intellectual
> property rights in and to the Software and AW Software, and any copies or
> portions thereof, shall remain in AWCOM and its suppliers or licensors. The
> Software and AW Software are protected by the copyright laws of the United
> States and international copyright treaties. Title, ownership rights, and
> intellectual property rights in and to any software, data, information,
> text, pictures, images, avatars, characters, sounds, personalities, or other
> content ("Content") accessed through the Software or otherwise with AW
> Software is the property of the applicable owner and may be protected by
> applicable copyright or other law. This License gives you no rights, title,
> or interest to Content (including without limitation Content that you post
> or create on the Active Worlds server) except the limited license to use the
> AW Software as described above.
>
> DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY. THE SOFTWARE, AW SOFTWARE, AND ANY SERVICES THAT
> YOU RECEIVE FROM AWCOM, ARE PROVIDED "AS IS." AWCOM HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL
> EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION WARRANTIES OF
> MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT.
>
> LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. You assume the entire risk as to the quality and
> performance of the Software or AW Software. AWCOM assumes no liability for
> the cost of any service or repair if the Software or AW Software is
> defective. Further, you assume the responsibility of, and any costs or
> liability associated with, making a connection (by any means) to the Active
> Worlds server, and you understand that the Software and AW Software will not
> operate without such a connection.
>
> AWCOM exercises no screening, editorial, or other control over Content
> available to you through your use of the Software and AW Software, and
> Content may include material that could be deemed distasteful, misleading,
> inaccurate, offensive, pornographic or otherwise objectionable. Furthermore,
> use of the Software or AW Software does not guarantee any privacy or
> confidentiality of any Content you post or make available through the
> Software and AWCOM assumes no responsibility or liability for the
> preservation of such Content and may modify or remove it at AWCOM's sole
> discretion. You hereby release AWCOM from any and all liability for all
> claims related to Content as well as claims related to the security or level
> of privacy provided.
>
> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES AND UNDER NO LEGAL THEORY, TORT, CONTRACT, STRICT
> LIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE, SHALL AWCOM OR ITS LICENSORS, SUPPLIERS OR
> RESELLERS BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
> INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES
> FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF GOODWILL, WORK STOPPAGE, COMPUTER FAILURE OR
> MALFUNCTION, OR ANY AND ALL OTHER COMMERCIAL DAMAGES OR LOSSES. IN NO EVENT
> WILL AWCOM BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF AWCOM LIST PRICE FOR A
> LICENSE TO THE SOFTWARE, EVEN IF AWCOM SHALL HAVE BEEN INFORMED OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
>
> TERMINATION. AWCOM may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement,
> the license granted herein, and your right to use or access the Software, AW
> Software, or the Active Worlds server at any time. On termination, you must
> destroy all copies of the Software.
>
> ARBITRATION. Any claim alleging a violation of any duty incident to this
> Agreement, or your use of the Software or the AW Software, or arising out of
> any transaction occurring in Active Worlds, irrespective of the legal theory
> asserted, is subject to binding arbitration. This means that both sides
> give up all rights to a jury or court trial. The arbitration will take
> place, at your choice, either on-line before the Active Worlds Tribunal, or
> before a panel of arbitrators at the American Arbitration Association
> offices in San Diego, California. In the latter instance, both sides shall
> pay half of the fees and expenses associated with the arbitration
> proceeding itself, but each side shall be responsible for all costs
> associated with traveling to the site of the arbitration, preparing for the
> arbitration, and hiring counsel, if desired. In both cases, both sides
> shall select an arbitrator from a randomly generated list of available
> arbitrators, and those two arbitrators shall select a third.
> No punitive or consequent damages (including without limitation statutory
> "multiplied," e.g. treble, damages) shall be awarded and the arbitrators
> shall be made aware of this limitation.
>
> EXPORT CONTROLS. None of the Software, AW Software or underlying
> information or technology may be downloaded or otherwise exported or
> re-exported (i) into (or to a national or resident of) Cuba, Iraq, Libya,
> Yugoslavia, North Korea, Iran, Syria or any other country to which the U.S.
> has embargoed goods; or (ii) into any country in which the U.S. has
> embargoed goods, or to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department's list of
> Specially Designated Nationals or the U.S. Commerce Department's Table of
> Deny Orders. By downloading or using the Software, you are agreeing to the
> foregoing and you are representing and warranting that you are not located
> in, under the control of, or a national or resident of any such country or
> on any such list.
>
> MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement represents the complete license agreement and
> supersedes all prior agreements and representations and may only be amended
> by a writing executed by the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is
> held to be unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be reformed
> only to the extent necessary to make it enforceable. This Agreement shall be
> governed by and construed under Massachusetts law.
>
> U.S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED RIGHTS. Use, duplication or disclosure by the
> Government is subject to restrictions set forth in subparagraphs (a) through
> (d) of the Commercial Computer-Restricted Rights clause at FAR 52.227-19
> when applicable, or in subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical
> Data and Computer Software clause in DFARS 252.227-7013, and in similar
> clauses in the NASA FAR Supplement.
>
> Created and produced by Activeworlds.com, Inc.
>
>
|
Jul 16, 2003, 5:47pm
heheh interesting.....
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3f15ab30$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> So, AWI is in violation of United States Export Controls. SWE would've
> already downloaded it by the time he recieved that message... so...
> who's at fault? AWI or SWE?
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
> No of SETI units returned: 35
> Processing time: 27 days, 15 hours.
> (Total hours: 663)
> www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
>
|
Jul 17, 2003, 3:06pm
geeez Brock are you THAT narrow minded? What makes you think the "next" TV station won't be the "best" TV station?
[View Quote]"brock" <BrockL at iceflare.net> wrote in message news:3f16b5e4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not ANOTHER tv station, god it's not like we dont have enough crap tv
> stations anyway.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
> "pc hamster" <pchamster at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f161ecc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> and
> out
> use
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2003, 1:42pm
OneSummer is NOT a hacker....sheeesh.....
[View Quote]"calhoun" <coen at charter.net> wrote in message news:3f1d59f5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> my cit is hacked and guess who told me? OneSummer that hacker and now I cant
> get on AW...
> "pineriver" <pineriver at thenett.com> wrote in message
> news:3f1c39d6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> cit
> files
> to
> to
> to
> to
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2003, 3:53pm
confirmation the last scenario is correct. Everyone Be Careful.
On the net, it's NOT always who you think it is.
Leo
[View Quote]"builderz" <builderz at vastnexus.com> wrote in message news:3F1D6FB1.8E8683B1 at vastnexus.com...
> Trust me, OneSummer is *not* a hacker, cracker, or script kiddie. She is
> always hosting community events and I host two bots for her in BluPearl
> world. If she sent you a telegram, it was probably to warn you *not* to
> click on a link or something. She's been a target of various "trouble
> makers" (had to use your word, BinaryBud ;) in the past and hardly ever
> is the cause of such problems. Another possibility is that she herself
> clicked on the bot link and her account password was stolen and someone
> else sent the telegram to you under her name.
>
> Builderz
> http://www.3dhost.net
>
> calhoun wrote:
|
Jul 23, 2003, 5:01pm
That sure WAS a threat. "...I will report you......I haven't reported you yet...... "
Is a threat as far as I read it.
[View Quote]"kol" <Fatsnail65 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3f1ecc36$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I never threatened you... you like to think I did... all I said was I found
> illegal material you are hosting and I will report you :))... I haven't
> reported you yet so...
>
> "mrbruce" <a1ctworld at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:3f1cc0d5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> me
> SALE!!!!!!!!!
> BAND-WIDTH
> REPORTED
> FOR
> CIVIL
> AROUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
|
Jul 23, 2003, 5:13pm
Put whatever label you need for you to understand it, Bowen. It's still a threat.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3f1edbd3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> It could be an ultimatem though? Maybe he's giving him a chance to take
> it off before he does. Or before he finds substantial proof that it is
> illegal? :-\
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
> No of SETI units returned: 41
> Processing time: 31 days, 9 hours.
> (Total hours: 753)
> www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
>
|
Jul 23, 2003, 5:28pm
Being an argumentative twit is not "being nice"......grow up Bowen.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3f1edf15$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> Well, I see trying to be nice doesn't work with you either. So, back to
> being an asshole to you, I go.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
> No of SETI units returned: 41
> Processing time: 31 days, 9 hours.
> (Total hours: 753)
> www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
>
|
Jul 25, 2003, 10:56am
Excuse me, but if you donate something you are not supposed to get anything in return.
do-nate - To present as a gift to a fund or cause; contribute
Leo :)
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message news:3f20a1e5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If I "donated" a certain amount of money to a grocery store, they will offer
> me some of their products as a "thank you".
>
> You need to learn to suck it up and take whatever is thrown at you. You
> can't call everything slander and threaten a court case on it. A lot of
> people are having problems with you just because of how you react when mud
> is thrown at you.
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2003, 1:44pm
OneSummer is NOT a hacker.... can only assume her account was stole by Matt also...
[View Quote]"calhoun" <coen at charter.net> wrote in message news:3f1d5b1c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I recieved a telegram from OneSummer giving me the link to the Trojan that
> is going around; is OneSummer a Hacker? or was OneSummer hacked too?
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2003, 4:49pm
excellent advise Builderz and Thanx for all the links in one spot...:) Much easier to pass along this way.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"builderz" <builderz at vastnexus.com> wrote in message news:3F1D847A.E601D99A at vastnexus.com...
> Since everyone is freaked out by the AW Toolkit and other nasty things
> going around, I decided to make a post about Windows security. Also,
> since I know a lot of you don't like to pay for things, all of the tools
> listed below are completely FREE.
>
> 1. Get a good anti-virus program and update it often. Use its "on
> demand" scanner that runs in memory and check files and programs when
> you open and close them. Most now automatically update their virus
> definition files at set intervals. Set it to update at least once every
> one to two weeks.
>
> FREE: Trend Micro's House Call
> http://housecall.trendmicro.com
>
> FREE: AVG Anti-Virus Free Ed.
> http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_dwnl_free.php
>
> FREE: Anti-Vir
> http://www.free-av.com
>
> 2. Get the latest patches for Windows and scan your system for insecure
> settings.
>
> FREE: Windows Update
> http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
>
> FREE: HFNetChk
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/tools/tools/hfnetchk.asp
>
> FREE: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/ tools/Tools/mbsahome.asp
>
> 3. Run a software firewall on your PC. I don't care if you are on the
> slowest dial-up connection there is or have the fastest broadband
> connection possible, just do it. Script kiddies and the like don't care
> what type of connection you have -- they just automatically try to break
> into your system with their automated tools.
>
> While using a combination of a software and hardware firewall/router is
> best, go with a software one if this is your first time using a
> firewall. Also, make sure the firewall has outbound protection. This
> will alert you if things such as a Trojan horse or unauthorized program
> (such as the fake AW Toolkit) try to send or "sneak" data from your PC.
> Also, be sure to run it at its highest security setting if you can.
>
> FREE: ZoneAlarm Free
> http://www.zonelabs.com
>
> FREE: Kerio Personal Firewall
> http://www.kerio.com/us/kpf_home.html
>
> 4. Get a program that blocks nasty scripts.
>
> FREE: AnalogX's Script Defender
> http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/system/sdefend.htm
>
> 5. Get rid of and/or block spyware, adware, and malware on your
> computer.
>
> FREE: Ad-aware
> http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/
>
> FREE: SpywareBlaster
> http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
>
> 6. Other tools you should get:
>
> FREE: GRC's UnPlug n'Pray
> http://grc.com/unpnp/unpnp.htm
>
> FREE: GRC's SocketToMe & SocketLock
> http://grc.com/dos/sockettome1.htm
>
> 7. Other tips:
>
> -Disable File & Printer sharing if you don't need it. If you do, only
> share the folders that you need (not entire disk drives) and use at
> least an eight character password on all shares.
>
> -Don't click on or open e-mail attachments from those you don't know.
>
> -Read security related forums and news to stay current with the latest
> trends and threats.
>
> -If you don't know how to do something, look it up using your favorite
> search engine (for example, Google).
>
> 7. Test, test, and test your computer's ports to see if they can be seen
> by others.
>
> FREE: GRC's Shields Up!
> https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
>
> FREE: Sygate Security Scan
> http://scan.sygatetech.com/
>
> FREE: Broadbandreports.com Scan
> http://www.dslreports.com/secureme
>
> And there are plenty of others out there.
>
> Builderz
> http://www.3dhost.net
|
Jul 23, 2003, 1:14pm
touché Thanx AWI...:)
[View Quote]"calpantera" <bill at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3f1ea4e8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Activeworlds has created a removal tool that will attempt to remove the
> trojan known as AWtoolkit from your computer. Please note that if your
> computer was compromised with this trojan other changes may have been made
> including the installation of other trojans. This tool only removes the
> AWToolkit that we have tested as of Tuesday July 22nd. Other modified
> versions may have been released since then. The code signed removal tool is
> located here
> http://objects.activeworlds.com/downloads/awtoolkit_remover.exe
>
>
|
Jul 23, 2003, 3:39pm
hmmm BB ponders hmmm I wonder what country Radiance is from? hmmmmm
[View Quote]"screb" <paul_zelf at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3f1ec2e8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Today I saw the following at: http://www.activeworlds.com/worlds/yellow
> Yellow Community Leader! The community team is looking for someone to help
> organize events and activities in Yellow. If you're interested in this
> position, please contact us at community at activeworlds.com .
> More like the above is written there. Please explain to me why at first we
> had this beautifull community alive there filled with many European and
> Australian cits and tourists wich AW with its PK's all hunted out, till
> Yellow became what it is now: a dead place.
> AW left it there the way it is now for over a year, most of the old regular
> Yellow cits did not renew and r gone now. Now suddenly AW is looking for a
> new Community Leader for Yellow. Just get for example Radiance back and with
> her the old cits... The community in Yellow will start flourish by itself
> then again... AW, dive in ur archives, send the old ppl an e-mail, make an
> offer they can't refuse otherwise I don't think its usefull to get yellow up
> and running again. At least it will never be what it has been b4: the world
> that made me and many others decide to become a cit, cause this world was
> "different".
> The great thing in Yellow was that it had this atmosphere wich was really
> not US oriëntated. Not that narrowminded as some Americans seem to be (sorry
> for this last line). Maybe it has been AWs policy to make AW real American
> this last year, and I must say they almost succeeded. Its a pity tho since
> AW used to have a much more diverse group of ppl in. For now AW does not get
> my support on this one... sorry.
>
> screb.
>
>
|
Jul 23, 2003, 5:12pm
Come on Baro.......you don't understand what the Gate is there for?. I thought you were quicker than that?
If you do not understand what AWGate is there for, how the hell can you criticize it?
[View Quote]"baro" <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message news:3f1ed797$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I absolutely couldn't stand Yellow. Horrible looking world, terrible gz,
> heck it was so poorly designed you started half way in the fireplace. One
> of those anceint building disasters that was cherished simply for being
> ancient. But that's not the point.
>
> I remember a ton of my non-north american time zone friends would hang out
> there. The main difference was that Yellow has CONVERSATION rather than the
> banal might as well be a bot "chatting" you see at awgate like:
>
> Has anyone seen my tourist friend?
> Hey everyone!! :)
> Hi so and so!
> *Hugs* so and so :))))
> How is everyone?
> Has anyone seen my tourist friend?
> How do I fly?
> My kitty is cute :p
> LOL
> ur so funny!
> Nice to see you again so and so! :)
> ROFL YOU!!! :)) :P
> Welcome to active worlds, here is a copied and pasted blurb which gives you
> no real information or help.
> ENZO IS GAY!!!!!11
> Has anyone seen my tourist friend?
> SHut Uup u faget!!
> Hey guys, be nice :(
>
> Seriously, 75% of the people at awgate and such could be replaced by a bot
> most of the time.
>
> and it seems the PK's and such HATED anything beyond such non-conversations.
> I remember them complaining that they were ejected or threatened to be
> ejected or just agressively told to change them topic if they ever had a
> polite political or economic discussion. Basicaly from what they complained
> to me, any time they went beyond saying hello and smilies, PK's would come
> in and tell them to get back to mindless "chat", while everyone came there
> to ESCAPE such things and actualy convey ideas. Sometimes they had orderly
> debates, or really deep discussions, but as soon as anything got too good,
> many times the PK would come in to "break it up"
>
> Now Yellow is dead. I say good riddance to the world, but I really miss
> having a place where there was a group of people who had the mental capacity
> to say more than hello or talk about their kitty. I've always wanted to
> build my world (Avatar) into a place like that (a place for fairly
> unrestricted exchanges of ideas, not horrid objects textures and building
> from the 4th layer of hell) but it's just so hard to get the "critical mass"
> of a community together. ... and the fact that it shuts down when I go to
> bed since I can't find a reliable free host....
>
> Wow, that turned out not only long but stupid. Sorry.
>
>
|
Jul 23, 2003, 5:27pm
Neither of you two spend enough time at the gate to make ANY assumptions like this. Period.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3f1edf42$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> No. He's correct in his assumptions of what the gate is and should be
> and what makes it bad currently.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
> No of SETI units returned: 41
> Processing time: 31 days, 9 hours.
> (Total hours: 753)
> www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
>
|
Jul 23, 2003, 5:31pm
I'm not assuming anything .....your the one doing that. You do not even lurk at the gate enough to make these assumptions.
Go henpeck someone else for a while.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3f1ee21e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> And your basing your assumption on that I talk all the time at the gate
> when I'm there? Please. I lurk for a reason.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
> No of SETI units returned: 41
> Processing time: 31 days, 9 hours.
> (Total hours: 753)
> www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
>
|
|
