|
|
binarybud // User Search
binarybud // User Search
Jun 9, 2003, 11:29am
This is nothing more than cheap entertainment.....LOL
Hows about just rolling with the flow instead of always bucking the system?
You'd be amazed how easy life really is.
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3ee3391e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Doesn't matter how many times, if you don't get warnings it isn't fair. Also
> it isn't fair if they don't show you what you did. For all I know, I
> could've done nothing... I just said swearing because did do it a few times
> (over the course of the 1 3/4 years I've been on AW). By few I meant 3-5
> times. If I was banned for swearing, then it was not justified. Let's break
> down the rule which most likely applies to my case (even though there is no
> way to know), and possibly others to prove my point. I'll start by saying
> that none of these are specific or straight forward enough to enforce
> anything.
>
> "Please do not engage in racial, religious, ethnic, or sexual slurs, lewd
> comments, or generally disruptive behaviour in public areas." First off,
> that is completely unspecific. There are no examples of things which apply.
> It says "racial, religious, ethnic, or sexual slurs, lewd comments, or
> generally disruptive behavior in public areas." It doesn't say "racial,
> religious, ethnic, or sexual slurs SUCH AS calling someone a derrogitory
> word." They should list them out (I didn't because I refuse to say them).
> This part of the rule happens to be the most straightforward one, so most
> people understand how to correctly comply; however, once I had to tell
> someone that j.. was a racial slur, which is an example of why this part of
> the rule is not specific enough. The next part of the rule simply says "lewd
> comments." It doesn't say "lewd comments SUCH AS comments on reproductive
> organs" and don't say lewd is straight forward, because even within the USA
> what is considered obscene, vulgar, evil, and/or wicked is different in the
> mind of each person (and many AW users are outside the US which makes the
> differences greater). I don't even consider evil to exist. The most vague,
> least specific statement is "disruptive behavior." It doesn't say
> "disruptive behavior SUCH AS swearing." For all I know, disruptive behavior
> could just be spamming and nothing else. It doesn't say what it is, and what
> is considered disruptive varies from person to person as well as culture to
> culture and sub-culture to sub-culture. Everything is relative. You might as
> well tell a room full of high, middle, and low economical class people that
> they have to give a lot of money to you, and expect nearly the same amount
> from each person. Its absolutely stupid.
>
> Second off, when writing rules, you should ALWAYS give a specific punishment
> for each rule. That's how it is for laws, so thats the way it should be for
> rules (and is in most cases). For all I know, lewd comments could be an
> instant ban, while insults could NEVER result in a ban. They could all have
> the same punishment for all I know, which is completely stupid because slurs
> are clearly much more severe than shouting or simple disruption.
>
> Third off, you have almost no idea what this can mean: "Activeworlds Inc. or
> its associates reserve the right to enforce compliance with these
> guidelines, which may include temporary ejection from the world." It isn't
> specific at all. All you know is that you can be temporarily ejected. There
> should be a table of punishments instead of a vague statement. There is
> nothing in that even hints "if you violate these rules 10 or 11 times at an
> AwInc world GZ then you are liable for universe ejection under the conduct
> guidelines."
>
> The content guidelines don't matter in this case, because that has to do
> with builds, welcome messages, and other things like that. Those are
> reasonably straight forward and specific, and its unfortunate that the
> conduct guidlines are not the same.
>
> Under the conduct guidelines of that page, I can have almost no idea what
> could be against the rules, as well as almost no idea of what can happen to
> me for violating them.
>
> Definition of lewd (http://www.webster.com):
>
> Main Entry: lewd
> Pronunciation: 'lüd
> Function: adjective
> Etymology: Middle English lewed vulgar, from Old English l[AE]wede laical,
> ignorant
> Date: 14th century
> 1 obsolete : EVIL, WICKED
> 2 a : sexually unchaste or licentious b : OBSCENE, VULGAR
> - lewd·ly adverb
> - lewd·ness noun
>
> Complete conduct guidelines
> (http://www.activeworlds.com/community/conduct.asp):
> "The following constitute the general rules of behaviour while visiting
> Active Worlds in Public meeting areas (areas within 400 meters of ground
> zero). Please read these thoroughly.
> a.. Please do not insult other tourists or citizens by use of inflammatory
> or offensive statements or images. We ask that you refrain from expressions
> of bigotry, racism, hatred, or profanity. Please do not harass other users,
> including verbal abuse or personal attacks.
> b.. Please do not engage in racial, religious, ethnic, or sexual slurs,
> lewd comments, or generally disruptive behaviour in public areas.
> c.. Public meeting areas are not appropriate spaces for cyber-sexual
> behaviour, sexual orientation discussions or activity.
> d.. The use of all caps is considered shouting, please refrain from using
> caps unless you are intending to shout. Please refrain from flooding
> (continuous posting of repetitive text)as this can be annoying to users.
> e.. Activeworlds Inc. or its associates reserve the right to enforce
> compliance with these guidelines, which may include temporary ejection from
> the world."
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3edee2de at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you
> flooding,
> PKs,
> It
>
>
>
|
Jun 9, 2003, 4:47pm
ME? NASTY? hardly kiddo. I don't get ejected.
oh and here's a warning for you to bank....."your gonna be ejected" sooner or later...i can tell....there are ya happy?
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3ee4d3eb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You shouldn't be nasty, it isn't a good habit.
> this case).
> If life is easy, why live?
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3ee48bce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> system?
> news:3ee3391e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Also
> times
> break
> no
> saying
> lewd
> apply.
> them).
> most
> of
> "lewd
> reproductive
> USA
> the
> the
> vague,
> behavior
> what
> to
> might as
> that
> amount
> punishment
> for
> have
> slurs
> Inc. or
> isn't
> There
> an
> conduct
> what
> to
> laical,
> inflammatory
> expressions
> users,
> slurs,
> using
> from
> then
> isn't it
> the
> day.
> grr
>
>
|
Jun 10, 2003, 12:13pm
ok here as nice as i can say...your a troublemaker.....:) you think swearing is cool just cause you have the right to.
You have very little respect for others but demand respect from others.
Now for the nasty stuff...
Have a nice day twit.
Leo :)
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at attbi.com> wrote in message news:3ee5d08f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "This is nothing more than cheap entertainment.....LOL" - Nasty thing to say
>
> "Hows about just rolling with the flow instead of always bucking the system?
> You'd be amazed how easy life really is." - Also nasty
>
> "ME? NASTY? hardly kiddo. I don't get ejected." - Also a nasty thing to
> say.
>
> I was ejected for swearing, not being nasty like you are. All of those are
> quite nasty things to say, and you clearly don't understand anything. I'm
> almost 100% sure I was banned for swearing. If they banned for attacks and
> nastiness of the boards, you'd be gone by now. Clearly you critisize me
> because I question authority, because I don't conform 100%. Good luck
> 'trying' to change me (and that's a nasty thing to say right there >:-P).
>
> "oh and here's a warning for you to bank....."your gonna be ejected"
> sooner or later...i can tell....there are ya happy?" = another nasty way to
> say something
>
> No, I will stay away from public worlds, because I like to voice my opinion,
> and it drives me crazy if I can't. If I want to hang out in a world with a
> lot of people, I'll do it in A!!CT where they don't care if you voice your
> opinion, and in fact start an intelligent conversation out of it instead of
> dismissing it and telling you to go to AWDebate which is ALWAYS empty (and
> thats nasty there too, but its the truth).
>
> Ok, now I'm going to say something nasty >:-P. Please DO NOT take the time
> to respond to my post if it is just going to be like the other ones. Making
> nasty little posts that have no point and don't back up what they say in any
> way shouldn't be posted. All it will do is result in arguements, dislike,
> and other bad things.
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3ee4d65a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sooner or later...i can tell....there are ya happy?
> news:3ee4d3eb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> in
> fair.
> few
> 3-5
> Let's
> there is
> enforce
> off,
> or
> "racial,
> derrogitory
> tell
> part
> says
> the
> in
> makes
> and
> culture
> people
> be
> an
> all
> because
> ejected.
> is
> times at
> to do
> the
> happen
> visiting
> ground
> cyber-sexual
> from
> users.
> enforce
> ejection
> actions.
> evidence in
> the
> time,
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2003, 5:00pm
LOL you DO read these posts right? LOL
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3ee0df75$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you werent world of the month, you were one of the top ones voted. but
> probly because you put something in your IO to try and persuade people to
> vote for you.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
> "mrbruce" <A1CTWorld at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:3edfe728$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> still
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2003, 5:25pm
lol 0% comprehension huh?
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3ee0e50f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yes
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3ee0e4df$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3ee0df75$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> to
> "world of
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2003, 5:03pm
Date Discovered: 06/04/2003 seems fairly fresh to me. :)
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message news:3ee0dc16 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ya call that new? :-o...... thats old by virus standards, lol
>
> "dlp anne" <anne at dreamlandpark.com> wrote in message
> news:3ee0996c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2003, 6:12pm
maybe a strain of this but not this one.
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message news:3ee0ee4e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Atcually this was sent to my father a few months ago. :-o
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3ee0e564$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3ee0dc16 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 10, 2003, 10:46am
lol hands down ENZO.... NewAW rocks and we are only seeing the surface as it is now.....Brock, if you do not see the potential in this project then you need to change your blinders......little wider angle.....:) Only problem i see is the timeframes involved.
IMHO
Leo :)
[View Quote]"baro" <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message news:3ee50665 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Who do I believe.... Brock or Enzo. I can't choose. So you two will have
> to fight to the death to prove who is right.
>
>
|
Jun 10, 2003, 1:29pm
it is NOT our responibility.... Parents hold that job. You must be a rotten parent if this is your MO.
I don';t think you are....so you should think about what your saying before you post.
[View Quote]"the lady" <thelady263414 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3ee5ec93 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It's the responsibility of the community to combat negative manipulation
> from other adults and children targeted at adults and children in the AW
> Universe. : )
>
> "trinity." <tesslacap at cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3ee5cf25 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> naive
>
>
|
Jun 10, 2003, 4:18pm
wrong-o
I don't have kids don't want 'em don't wanna raise them....your not shoving that responsibility off on me just cause i chat in AW are ya? LOL you need to use your head a little more than the keyboard hon.
[View Quote]"the lady" <thelady263414 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3ee6124a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It is the responsibility of the entire community to mentor, watch out for,
> discipline, teach, raise a child. : )
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3ee5f961$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> rotten parent if this is your MO.
> before you post.
> news:3ee5ec93 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> child
> far
> monitor
>
>
|
Jun 16, 2003, 12:20pm
I might add....and of course your just like everyone else just like Brock. so your a loser and quit thinking otherwise.
Anything you do will fail.....just like everyone else. LOL
The preceding message was total sarcasm
Leo :)
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3eeb5386$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The NG is aw's forums.
> Don't take it upon yourself to make an AW Forum.
> Many people have done it before.
> Their forums went nowhere.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2003, 11:08am
if that is so , then you/your co-workers are not doing their jobs correctly. Do it correctly , with respec for others and there is nothing gross about that type of job. But if you just don;t care....then you are correct. You need to care more.
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message news:3efa4916 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i always figured if you work at a fast food place, you would be too grossed
> out to eat from it :)
>
> -SWE
>
> "jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
> news:3ef7c510 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
> cit
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2003, 1:40pm
lol that not what he/we were referring to..... and you say that like I've never worked in a kitchen..:)
Leo :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3efb0f99$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> You wouldn't say that if you had to clean the grease. ;)
>
> It's easy to make the food, it's a whole different ballgame to clean up
> after it.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jun 26, 2003, 3:53pm
lol quite a few actually..:) and it never effected the quality of my dishes either..:)
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3efb1a62 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> Ever had to degrease a broiler hood? :P
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jun 26, 2003, 4:42pm
Hey Rick...i think his point was "With proper backup procedures you should NEVER lose ANY posts to your NG" We count on you at least holding up this end of it...we have no control over it...and those posts should be viewed as an ASSET to your company.
Make sense now?
Leo :)
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3efb3b9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I did not back it up before rebuilding.
>
> To my knowledge those posts did not exist on our NG for some time they would
> have expired. You might possibly have had them stored in your cache, in
> which case they probably are still there. Since I do not know enough about
> your reader or backup methods locally I am sorry but I cannot even begin to
> help find those posts.
>
>
> Sorry
>
>
> E
>
>
> "baron" <pk39srt at hot[youknowwhat].com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.19655230d27c896a9896ab at news.activeworlds.com...
> says...
> were
> sure
> misconfiguration
> which
> newsgroup
> first
> Apr
> 1998;
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2003, 4:44pm
thats not what i said.... theres a big difference between deleting posts and LOSING them..:)
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3efb3ece at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> Yeah don't delete posts. ;)
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jun 27, 2003, 11:02am
SWE this is not a lame chat channel here...this is a NEWSgroup.. ... the old articles were very important information(minus all the squabbling)..... Researching these was a goldmine of usefull information.... it's like burning your library every now and then....what the hell good is that?
When asked a technical question in AW, one of my favorite responses was.."i think i read that in the NG a while ago....go search them" and ususally the fix was in....but now most of that is lost....:(
Leo :(
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message news:3efb814a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> bloody hell! not like any of you were gonna read the old posts anyway! i
> mean, look at what happens when someone simply replies to a 2 month old one,
> yet alone a 6 yr old one...
>
> -SWE
>
> "baron" <pk39srt at hot[youknowwhat].com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.196406dabeda16da9896aa at news.activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2003, 2:35pm
naaa your way off base on this one There are alot more people that read these posts than reply to them....
Why reply when you have to deal with "the lamers in here".....Thats how most people feel. But it's still a good read every now and then.....especially the technical groups.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"stecloud" <stecloud at fsmail.net> wrote in message news:3efc6c34 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yeah but most people are only complaining because they want to use past
> posts against people to proove them wrong :P
>
> Thats the kind of NG this place is.
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2003, 4:39pm
I'd much rather go over TZ's "technical and informative" posts than your lame-ass usless replys to everyone. and YES i am fed up with your "i'm so cool" smartass reply's learn do do something constructive maybe.
I don't believe in doing this but keep it up and your going in my killfile....your starting to waste my stress...:)
Leo :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3efc7a7e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> I'd rather they not still exist. You know... so I don't have to deal
> with TZ replying to things from 1997. :P
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jun 27, 2003, 5:55pm
wow Rick our point here IS you LOST a lot of posts you should never have lost....there is NO NEED to lose these...
A backup of your DB BEFORE you make mods or delete anything will keep you from losing this data. It's important to have someone that knows what they are doing do things like this for this very reason. DATA is gold in the new world. And your company is losing data/gold with actions like this.
OK Laymans terms....lets say a user just joins AW and finds the newsgroups and decides to learn from them....he can only go back as far as your last modification to the NG...as it seems every mod we lose posts. this will do new users absolutly no good.... especially since resent posting is more like a soap opera inhere....;) but the TECH groups all have good usefull information in them....even/especially the old ones.... it's kinda like making a usermanula that only has the LATEST additions to your software in it...how do people learn about the stuff thats been there?
am i making any sense yet? lol
Leo :)
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3efc95e9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not really
>
> I didn't lose any posts. I deleted post in certain threads. Why would I
> backup posts I was deleting? My point is we do not store old posts, if you
> cache and backemup yerself then you have a history we do not keep. I guess
> I will have to beg you for em when I need em.
>
>
> :)
>
>
> E
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3efb3e9e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> NEVER lose ANY posts to your NG" We count on you at least holding up this
> end of it...we have no control over it...and those posts should be viewed as
> an ASSET to your company.
> news:3efb3b9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> would
> about
> to
> enzo at activeworlds.com
> commands
> have
> policy
> the DB
> 27
> 31
> by
>
>
|
Jun 27, 2003, 6:04pm
Oh that was so sweet of you.
Typical fence post response. Stop telling me how i am supposed to type dipshit. I'm not into doing it according to the "world of Bowen".
Lameass twitT sorry to borrow that Eep. :)
Also fix your reader if you can't read my text...ask your little sister she can help ya i'm sure.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3efc9fb6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> binarybud wrote:
>
> Oh, that was golden BB. "smartass reply's..." You could, also, learn
> to do something constructive or also something more creative than "I'm
> older than you so..."
>
> Also, wrap your text. And move your finger away from the space bar, you
> seem to have a weight on it... or something.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jun 27, 2003, 6:05pm
<bows head> sowwy i tried...:(
[View Quote]"baron" <pk39srt at hot[youknowwhat].com> wrote in message news:MPG.1966ce4e178641a79896ae at news.activeworlds.com...
> In article <3efca142$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>, leo at realPANTStourvision.com
> says...
> only has the LATEST additions to your software in it...how do people learn about the stuff thats been there?
>
> Give it up BB, AWI does not "store old posts", must be some sort of new trend
> on handling NNTP...guess we are old fashioned. Someone should notify google
> that they shouldn't waste all this space storing all posts on usenet since
> 1983.
>
> --
> ./B
|
Jun 27, 2003, 7:21pm
I'm not interested in changing MY style just so you can read it...prefer you not read my posts actually... I waste to much time with you and your twit wit....:)
..
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message news:3efcb34b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> agent1 wrote:
>
> Yeah, and? Some systems can't show lines that don't wrap either.
> Better to wrap it and have it look odd then to not wrap it and only have
> certain newsreaders be able to read it.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jun 26, 2003, 11:06am
Thats YOUR opinion Brock and you know what opinions are like?
BTW ...at this point, your opinion is rendered totally useless .
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3efa3ee5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You see, Andras spammed something useful, you did not. You should be
> ashamed.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 10:47am
You sound like a toublemaker to me....post the chat please...:) Sorry to rush to judgement....but i do have a sense for these things...:)
Leo :)
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> Hullo!
> After 4 years in AW i have decided not to pay anymore.
> the gate, Gatekeepers, double standards and Holocaust denial:
> As AW is shrinking, i found myself more and more at AWGate,
> which in some hours is the only place you can chat in english,
> not in a Ds or Gor world and without gaining ex. points.
> After 3 years i found out there are Gatekeepers in AW,
> and the sight was very unpleasant.
> In my opinion, most of those people are a huge disfunction.
> Most of them use the guidelines only to pick on people they don't like,
> While they let their friends say and do whatever they want.
> I tried to contact gatekeepers at activeworlds.com and didn't got a productive
> answer,
> then i contact the management which chose to pass my emails to kellie which,
> again,
> did nothing productive.
> The limit was crossed when Vermin2 was justifying Hitler's deeds at the
> gate, without any respond from the Gatekeeper,
> Tigger GK, who was aware enough of what's going on to eject me for saying
> the GK's made a sport from ejecting me.
> I guess that Tigger's ego is far much a delicate matter than the lives of
> the millions who died in WW2.
>
> P.S : I am still waiting for an answer from gatekeepers at activeworlds.com and
> kellie about Tigger's behavior that day.
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 12:37pm
I for one do not buy this post...your missing to much GK chatter...:) And i stand by my original assessment..:)
Leo :)
Don't make trouble at the Gate and you won't be in trouble at the Gate..:)
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BB2618B2.896%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article 3f003179$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
> leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 3:47 PM:
>
> here is the log:
>
> Immigration Officer: Welcome to the AWGate. Much of the content in Active
> Worlds is user generated & may not be appropriate for all users. Setting
> your browser rating level can improve your enjoyment of AW by reducing your
> exposure to offensive content. Enjoy your stay :)
> [Customs Aide]: Welcome, IggyTheAlleayCat. For the Conduct Guidelines
> please say World Rules or see
> http://www.activeworlds.com/community/conduct.asp
> [Customs Aide]: Welcome, IggyTheAlleayCat. For the Conduct Guidelines
> please say World Rules or see
> http://www.activeworlds.com/community/conduct.asp
> Bowen: instead of those that want to cause problems, like pay off tabacco
> and oil industries
> Amunition121: hi ppl
> "Minoataur78": nah, tallahasee
> "LeglizHemp": hi 121
> Moron.: hi Amnu
> Moron.: <---missed again...grrrrr
> "Vermin2": No, that Jew Russian Lenin who led the Bolshivick revolution.
> Tigger GK: Hi amun
> Nevik: Better idea is , if they want to make a law, let em pay for it out
> of their OWN pocket
> "LeglizHemp": john lennon was a russian?
> Moron.: lol Leg
> 000: 1918 lenin
> Bowen: yeah I like that idea Nevik ;)
> "Weird": Tigger
> IggyTheAlleayCat: no leglized only commnist
> "Vermin2": Kinda funny huh, I bet you didn't know Hitler was half jew
> either.
> Bowen: but then it has to be approved by the public ;)
> "LeglizHemp": darn and i always thought he was from liverpool
> Bowen: who didn't know Hitler was jewish?
> "Weird": Are you an experienced builder
> IggyTheAlleayCat: tigger now you allow a nazi chat ?!
> 000: no he was a chirstian
> Bowen: it's fine, it's certainly within G limits iggy
> "Weird": what do i type in the action box to make when I click on the
> object, the midi stops playing, click on it again, it starts playing again?
> "LeglizHemp": nazi are easy to tease
> Moron.: lol
> "Vermin2": No he was a fool who attached onto an idea.
> "Kevin": GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!
> IggyTheAlleayCat: vermin quit that ok take it to aw debate
> "Weird": Can you help me tigger
> Julionna K: *looks to Kevi and sees him growling and giggles*
> "Vermin2": And people followed him because they were weak of mind and
> soul.
> Moron.: lol Juli
> IggyTheAlleayCat: vermin cut that
> "LeglizHemp": i am weak of mind....lead me......LOL
> "Weird": what do i type in the action box to make when I click on an
> object with a midi, the midi stops playing, click on it again, it starts
> playing again?
> Moron.: <--weak of mind....lol
> "Vermin2": I appologize, I love being, my own man.
> Julionna K: hehe
> "Weird": TIGGER! what do i type in the action box to make when I click on
> an object with a midi, the midi stops playing, click on it again, it starts
> playing again?
> "LeglizHemp": my head sounds like a spray paint can when i shake it
> "Vermin2": But then?
> NuttyRedHead: hello everyone :)
> Moron.: <---listening to leg's Head..........
> Julionna K: *mutes herself*
> Julionna K: oppppps
> "LeglizHemp": LOL
> Moron.: hi Nutty
> IggyTheAlleayCat: (to "Vermin2") vermin,all my moms family got to the
> ovens but her parnts and two aunts please cut it
> "Weird": darn
> NuttyRedHead: hiya Tigger and Moron :)
> Julionna K: hello NRH
> "Vermin2": I refuse to loose my Constitutional right just because some
> beaurocrat says so.
> NuttyRedHead: hi Julionna :)
> IggyTheAlleayCat: thank you vermin
> Moron.: at least you have somthing in there Leg.....lol
> "LeglizHemp": bummer tigger you missing great tune right now
> IggyTheAlleayCat: when you log to AW you have no continutional right you
> have guidelines
> Nevik: Mornin Nutty, Nutty? ...........{{{{{{{{{{{{{Nutski}}}}}}}}}}} :}
> "LeglizHemp": floyd........echos
> "Vermin2": Iggy, you have a mandate to stand up.
> "LeglizHemp": awesum
> Onexpresso: gee those nose landings
> Onexpresso: hello Iggy
> NuttyRedHead: hehehe (((((((((Nev)))))))))))
> Moron.: wb One
> 000: yeh bill of right onlt apply to gov
> Nevik: Hi One :}
> "Vermin2": I want my rights back.
> Onexpresso: Greetings Honorable Tigger
> 000: sould be a corp bill of rights
> Julionna K: *ventures off and goes waundering about*
> Moron.: <--of all the things i've lost, i miss my mind the
> most.......sigh
> "LeglizHemp": i think there should be a moron bill of rights....what do u
> think moron?
> "Kevin": Yikes
> Nevik: Bill of rights? hes retired , but Hillary is still around
> "Vermin2": Send the message through the land, but not Washington.
> "Kevin": *Hides*
> Moron.: <---agrees with Leg
> NuttyRedHead: (((((((Kevin))))))))
> Moron.: dont go to far Juli.......lol
> "LeglizHemp": we have the right to be stupid and oblivious
> "Kevin": ((((((((((((((NRH))))))))))))))
> Onexpresso: Hello Red
> Onexpresso: hugs 2u
> NuttyRedHead: hiya Onex :)
> "Vermin2": Them willy wakers that set on tall chairs.
> Moron.: 3 cheers for Leg
> Nevik: Time ta go ta work.... later all :}
> Julionna K: *leaps into the water and swims across*
> Moron.: later Nevik
> NuttyRedHead: Tigger, has Mr Barton been in yet thismorning?
> Nevik: adidas, Hostile ole banana
> "LeglizHemp": lol moron we should work on that bill of rights
> sometime.......lol
> Moron.: <--hasnt seen him Nutty
> NuttyRedHead: have a good one Nev ;)
> NuttyRedHead: ok, thank you Moron and Tigger :)
> "Vermin2": Now cool it down.
> Moron.: yes we should Leg.....lol
> Moron.: <---looking for pencil..........
> Moron.: nite Tigger
> NuttyRedHead: take care Tigger :)
> Moron.: you ok Juli??
> "Vermin2": We need time to read the CONSTITUTION.
> "LeglizHemp": nite tigger....don't bend your tail
> IggyTheAlleayCat: those GK's made a sport from ejecting me even when ppl
> stalk me I am the one thtat get ejected :/
> "Kevin": LOL
> "LeglizHemp": lol
> Moron.: you sure, the Ackkk sounded bad.....lol
> "Vermin2": Do you think you can do it?
> "LeglizHemp": or both tigs?
> Immigration Officer: You have been ejected from awgate
>
>
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:07pm
If you muted them how the hell can you complain about their behavior? How do you know they did not eject you after trying to communicate with you, and you kept "ignoring" them? Ya know one basic rule at the Gate you seem to over look....The GK's are in charge whether you like it or not. And it has to be that way. WHY? Because we don't want people like YOU in charge. :)
Leo :)
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BB26260C.89B%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article 3f004b27$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
> leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 5:37 PM:
> i muted the GK
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:10pm
You, also, have toublemaking tendencies and should avoid the gate at all times....you do not like authority figures..I've seen you in action at the gate......:)
There you have it.....no charge for the assessment.
Leo :)
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f0050ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No, the GK force really is horrible. Not to say that there aren't a few
> superb GKs, but most of them are horrible.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f003179$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> rush to judgement....but i do have a sense for these things...:)
> news:BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> productive
> which,
> saying
> of
> and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:31pm
I agree with this assessment .Duo. Want to harass someone about the GK's? Let AWI know how upset you are with the current Staff and give them NAMES. If they see certain names being repeated in a bunch in Emails maybe they will listen huh?
There ARE bad apples in every bushel.....that for sure does not spoil the whole bushel.....as long as you pick out the bad ones now and then......:) Someone DOES need to sit around and watch them for performance.... I've seen some pretty lame GK's that are great people but did not know first thing about "helping" someone with a problem. It's a hard "job" to be friendly...welcoming...supportive.... and still deal with troublemakers.....and the bottom line is they VOLUNTEER for this...:)
It's a neat "club" to be in......but they still need to have a channel for getting rid of the bad apples a little faster. It's amazing how fast they can get rid of a "helpful/knowledgeable" GK when they do not fit in politically or personally with a fellow GK.....but then leave a "rotten apple" on staff for years. and ignore there behavior/lack of service, only cause they are well liked in the "club"....this crap has to go.
My 2 cents
Leo :)
PS; I see a heck of a lot more cit's "Cross the line" than I ever do with the GK's.
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f004fe4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I agree 100%. They should hire GKs on skill and not what's in that silly
> form. They have to at least monitor their GKs a bit. I remember when I was
> applying to be a GZ monitor in A!!CT, I was assigned to monitor the GZ and
> the jobs I did for some time were MONITORED to see if they were good. They
> based whether you were made a permanent GZ monitor or not on that, and
> nothing else. Thats how GKs should be evaluated. They also need to
> re-evaluate all the current GKs, because honestly... there are some REALLY
> bad ones.
>
> One way is that if they would loosen up the age restriction there would be
> more people to choose from. I know plenty of people who fit the job better
> than the ones currently there, and not most (but a lot) of them are not
> adults.
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> productive
> which,
> and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 1:35pm
ok....how many HOURS a day do you spend at the gate helping people?
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f005446$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I dought iggy was making trouble at the gate. You are making assumptions
> without any basis, and being extremely nasty by putting smile faces there.
> If you can prove that there aren't a bunch of bad GKs, I'll believe you.
> Honestly, I'd believe iggy over you any day. First of all, you can tell iggy
> is upset, which wouldn't be true if it didn't happen. Second off, that chat
> log is legitimate because the grammar differs and everything. I think that
> considering that iggy probably muted the GK, it is completely legitimate.
> You don't prove that iggy is a troublemaker either, so I will assume you are
> making a false claim and not believe you on that, and from that I can
> discredit the rest of your post too, because it also is all false claims.
>
> Honestly, I think you have no sense for these things AT ALL. The only reason
> anyone would believe you is because they fear being banned or punished.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f004b27$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And i stand by my original assessment..:)
> news:BB2618B2.896%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> Active
> your
> Guidelines
> Guidelines
> tabacco
> revolution.
> out
> again?
> click on
> starts
> some
> you
> :}
> do u
> ppl
> Sorry to
> like,
> productive
> which,
> the
> saying
> lives of
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com and
>
>
|
|
