Board ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
ananas // User Search
ananas // User SearchSpace Ship ColumbiaFeb 2, 2003, 6:09am
Dracula is critical, not anti-american. He trusts Bush and those
who voted for him as little as I do. [View Quote] Space Ship ColumbiaFeb 3, 2003, 2:30pm
Space Ship ColumbiaFeb 3, 2003, 2:43pm
Sounds like there are 2 classes of people, a small elite that
is considered a loss for mankind. All others - well, shit happens. I personally do not like military people too much but I still do not think they are less worthy than civilians. Maybe more stupid though - but that's their job. [View Quote] Space Ship ColumbiaFeb 3, 2003, 3:30pm
hm, I thought about it and I think I should refine my statement :
I _do_ consider military people who attack less worthy. Btw.: I think it is quite normal that they publish an accident like this more than a shool bus accident. Those people stood more in the center of publicity when they lived, so it is only normal that their accident has more publicity too. [View Quote] Space Ship ColumbiaFeb 3, 2003, 4:02pm
Romans has been an extremely aggressive nation, I do not understand
the "even" in your reply. About the school bus - if a school bus in the US is destroyed in an accident, we will have s small notice in the news, same for the US news if a school bus is destroyed in germany. It was just an example for worse events that get less notice. Worse because the kids do not know about the risk and are not asked if they are willing to take it, not because of more or less worthy people. No one who went this way can be brought back - it's final :( [View Quote] AWHS CornerFeb 3, 2003, 2:38pm
People ask me about your programs often, why shouldn't
the same happen to you :) The program is here => http://oct31.de/aw/undoc/awdat2dmp/ but the current version is one with tilt/roll - if the world.dat is from an older browser version, I can make the necessary changes quite easily and supply that version too if needed. There haven't been requests for a 2.2/3.1 compatible one so I haven't made one yet. Alphabit, do you already have a dump and from what kind of AW browser is it ? [View Quote] AWHS CornerFeb 3, 2003, 5:13pm
cell.dat + cell.idx is all that's needed for the propdump,
I will make a 2.2 version, just be sure to save those two somewhere and have some patience, I have a bit too much RL work at the moment to start at once :) I cannot restore models from the cache though, textures are partially possible ( http://oct31.de/aw/rwras2bmp/index.html ) [View Quote] AWHS CornerFeb 4, 2003, 3:32pm
OK, it is there now http://oct31.de/aw/undoc/awdat2dmp/
awdat2dmp22 can create Version 2 and Version 3 propdumps from Version 2 world.dat/world.idx databases. Source is included, the changes that were necessary have been really minor, a 10 minutes task :) You should be able to use the world admin tool for uploading the dump or any build bot. Beware : the program itself is a console application, it has to be started in a Win32 console ("DOS"-Box ;) awdat2dmp22 i=cell.dat o=cell.dmp creates Type 3 propdumps awdat2dmp22 i=cell.dat o=cell.dmp t=2 creates Type 2 propdumps [View Quote] AWHS CornerFeb 5, 2003, 3:29am
um, it does never modify the cell.dat/.idx files at all.
Those can not become larger. What you need to do : - Start a Windows console (DOS box / DOS screen) - Go to the directory where your dat file and the awdat2dmp22.exe is stored ("cd" command) - the .C file isn't needed. - Type in this command : awdat2dmp22 i=cell.dat o=cell.dmp - Press the enter key ;) Result will be a file called cell.dmp, a standard version 3 propdump that you can use for bots to build. Optional you can use awdat2dmp22 i=cell.dat o=cell.dmp t=2 if you have a bot that prefers version 2 propdump files. If you do not use it like this, it just gives a "usage" message and sends an error return code to windows - then it disappears at once as windows handles DOS boxes quite wrong. It should not close them when they give an error return code. [View Quote] Hmmmm.....Feb 6, 2003, 2:59pm
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------132C0A2CA39E38ECF6515CA4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit sigh ;) Save the attached file into the same folder where you have awdat2dmp22.exe, cell.dat and cell.idx, then double-click it in the windows explorer [View Quote] YXdkYXQyZG1wMjIgaT1jZWxsLmRhdCBvPWNlbGwuZG1wDQoNCg== --------------132C0A2CA39E38ECF6515CA4-- Rot13 EncryptionFeb 10, 2003, 6:29am
rot13 has never been a secret encryption, it was thought to keep
children from reading dirty jokes in newsgroups. [View Quote] Avatar StudioFeb 14, 2003, 4:56am
WRL is a 3D format, JPG is a 2D format ad .SAV is
not a defined format. You can convert WRL to most other 3D formats, helpful for that are http://home.snafu.de/hg/ (freeware) and http://www.micromouse.ca/ (trial available) With glview you can render a WRL to a BMP file and convert this to JPG with http://www.irfanview.com - but it is not a converted WRL then as it doesn't have any of the 3D informations of WRL anymore, it is just a static picture. [View Quote] Recommendation for mail client?Mar 4, 2003, 3:37pm
Agreed, Eudora is very good.
Although NetScape is an acceptable AllInOne solution, Eudora has some major advantages as it supports multiple accounts better than netscape mail, including webmail. What I like better in NetScape is the combination mail/news, that's why I neither use eudora nor fagent. I think mail and news are so close related that they should not have 2 separate programs. [View Quote] XP and AWMar 6, 2003, 2:16pm
Try to force software rendering in the first step,
in aworld.ini look for this : [video] mode= and set it to mode=2 If this does work, you can switch to different modes from the browser. I think, software mode is the least critical one. [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 6, 2003, 5:34pm
Pakistan has nuclear weapons and does not care much about human rights
India has nuclear weapons and there's much killing going on there Turkey has quite a big army and human rights count not much there China - wait, they are already on the list, further down France has nuclear weapons and - hm, their strategic position in Europe isn't bad Germany ... oops, I don't want to give Rambo Bush ideas Fact is - there is no legal(!) reason for a war between the US and Iraq, I don't mind if Hussein is killed somehow but no reason to kill thousands of civilians, destroy the already poor economy completely and add Iraq to the countries that will not survive on their own. Last not least, a lot of culture will be destroyed by bombs. [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 6, 2003, 7:14pm
Mesopotamien is the source of most known culture and Mesopotamien
has been where the Iraq is now [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 7, 2003, 1:09am
Re: American SupportMar 7, 2003, 1:38am
Actually not a reply, I just wanted to add one more
intesting link to this discussion : http://www.waronwant.org and especially this page : http://www.waronwant.org/?lid=3583 If you have read this, those who do not understand already might get an idea who the real aggressor is. I found the link through http://www.attac.org/ btw. Re: American SupportMar 7, 2003, 5:09pm
Interesting, which interests does the US have in Iraq?
Hussein did nothing outside of his country, the weapons are not prooved, the Arab countries are interested in solving the problem their own way, Turkey might be interested in joining the attack. Children in Iraq have only little chance to survive, theirs is an interest that counts. People in Iraq are interested in food and medicine which is blocked since 10 years. This interest counts too. Muslim countries are interested in having no capitalistic armies in their countries, an interest I can understand and accept. But what are the interests of the USA in this region of the world? [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 7, 2003, 5:12pm
Re; Tw is a hacker (dont knwo iuf first post worked)Mar 8, 2003, 6:54pm
Spellcheckers are for people who cannot write properly.
Otoh. I would be interested to know what a Norwegian spell checker would do to an English text ... [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 8, 2003, 12:32am
Re: American SupportMar 8, 2003, 7:21pm
Oh, come on - this is not really fair.
Just because those war-crazy idiots like [short namelist removed] have a bigger mouth than those many others who think that war is wrong, this should not cover all of America. I posted several links here already that show how many people in _all_ countries - including UK and USA - are against war. [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 8, 2003, 7:27pm
Well, they if you need a dictator to do the dirty jobs, support him.
If you need someone to be a declared enemy, the same dictator might help out again. [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 9, 2003, 9:17am
If this war is making him unpopular that means people do not
want his war. I'm happy to read this statement here :) [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 9, 2003, 9:55am
You need to know where this war back then came from.
The US and England (if I recall correct) installed and supported a regime in Iran that the Arab people did not accept. They called Khomeini back and sent Rezah Pahlevi to hell - the Sheik who's dad has been an enemy of the US and who spent most money for himself and nothing for the population, who ignored religion and tradition of Iran. Iran has been economically blocked, people started to starve there, the press showed how bad the conditions are since Khomeini took his place. I was believed everything I have seen in the press back then, not understanding the backgrounds - and I hated Khomeini. Today I think many might have starved because of the blockade, not because of Khomeini. The same Saddam Hussein who is now the leader of Iraq has been the leader back then too. He has not been even a little bit better than now but has been supported, which caused even more hate in this region - hate against the "western world". What makes people think it might work better this time? The scenery is not so much different and the experience should show that the same mistake should not be made again. Unfortunately all the old experts for near east politics are not active anymore, it would be interesting to hear what they think. Like Saddam Hussein, Bin Laden has been supported too, against the USSR - and it backfired too. The crisis Pakistan/India/Bangladesh is a result of "western world" interactions in their region too. If "we" (the western world) do not keep our fingers out of "their" politics - except beeing asked for economical and humanitary (sp?) support - the hate will not end. "Their" hate feeds "our" hate and vice versa. This is a thing that will not change with the time if the actions stay the same. I am not a history pro and have always been bad in history at school, this is from my memory and from what I have been reading so I might miss some facts. But this is how it looks to me - including the influence of media and potential lies of course. [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 9, 2003, 10:23am
100% true for Germany and Austria, the republicans are neo-nazis
and IMO partially true for Bush. [View Quote] Re: American SupportMar 9, 2003, 6:44pm
FYI, UNMOVIC Quarterly Report, February 28 :
http://www.acronym.org.uk/docs/0302/doc18.htm Re: American SupportMar 9, 2003, 6:54pm
|