|
|
to daphne (General Discussion)
to daphne // General Discussion
Sep 1, 2002, 5:54am
I want to thank you for your time tonight in explaining things to me was
a simple misunderstanding after all thanks again *hugs*
Sep 1, 2002, 10:29am
Er, ever heard of email or telegrams? No need to post this crap here...unless you're THAT desperate for attention or to somehow be "forgiven" by people who don't give 2 shits and a piss anyway...<roll eyes>
[View Quote]
> I want to thank you for your time tonight in explaining things to me was
> a simple misunderstanding after all thanks again *hugs*
Sep 1, 2002, 10:50am
Ladies and Gentleman, I'd like to announce that this year's winner of the
*sigh* award goes to... eep... for consistently causing a multitude of
people to *sigh* with every post he makes. Able to stick his nose where it
doesn't belong in a single bound. Able to leap tall stretches of fact to an
irrational conclusion in a mere nanosecond. Never fails to take (or make)
an opportunity to spew childish and vulgar drivel. The man is amazing.
Indeed, eep is a true jerkus maximus, and I can think of none other in this
NG more deserving of this lack of distinction.
Congrats, eep. Now crawl back into the sewer from which you oozed.
Kerstin
Self-appointed Head (and Body) of the *sigh* Awards Committee
[View Quote]"eep" <eepNOSPAM at tnlc.com> wrote in message
> Er, ever heard of email or telegrams? No need to post this crap
here...unless you're THAT desperate for attention or to somehow be
"forgiven" by people who don't give 2 shits and a piss anyway...<roll eyes>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 11:49am
[View Quote]On 1 Sep 2002 08:50:36 -0400, "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote:
|
>Ladies and Gentleman,
Eep has a point here; Linn's post belongs more in email/telegrams than it does in a newsgroup.
Sep 1, 2002, 12:46pm
True, but he doesnt hafta be an A-hole about is.........
[View Quote]"tony m" <ag5v1u7001 at sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:2a54nugtig6v18d87oclib5ob28t4nrro0 at 4ax.com...
> On 1 Sep 2002 08:50:36 -0400, "ambivalent" <kersting at blast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Eep has a point here; Linn's post belongs more in email/telegrams than it does in a newsgroup.
|
Sep 1, 2002, 12:58pm
> Eep has a point here; Linn's post belongs more in email/telegrams than it does in a
newsgroup.
Not always available. A person might not know someone elses e-mail and/or the person
they are trying to reach blocks all incoming telegram. In which case, this would be
the next best place.
--Bowen--
Sep 1, 2002, 1:32pm
So if you don't know someone's address you'll run an ad in the paper with
your message because it's "the next best place"? Really, there's no reason
to post messages to one person in a public newsgroup.
-Agent1
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
news:3d722b09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
it does in a newsgroup.
>
> Not always available. A person might not know someone elses e-mail and/or
the person they are trying
> to reach blocks all incoming telegram. In which case, this would be the
next best place.
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:23pm
you acting stupid, or were you born that way? how can you compare a ad in
the papers to the NGs? its like when someone wants to get something all his
other friends get, and thier parents say "if your friends jump off a cliff,
would you?"
SWE
-just found out he can post in the NGs again
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at ShatteredPlatters.com> wrote in message
news:3d723305 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So if you don't know someone's address you'll run an ad in the paper with
> your message because it's "the next best place"? Really, there's no reason
> to post messages to one person in a public newsgroup.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com> wrote in message
> news:3d722b09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it does in a newsgroup.
and/or
> the person they are trying
> next best place.
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:32pm
The newsgroups have never been, and never will be, a proper place for *personal* communication. Newsgroups are, by design, a medium for public announcements and group discussion. Personal communications do not belong here, especially when other modes for said communication are available.
[View Quote]swe wrote:
> you acting stupid, or were you born that way? how can you compare a ad in
> the papers to the NGs? its like when someone wants to get something all his
> other friends get, and thier parents say "if your friends jump off a cliff,
> would you?"
>
> "agent1" <Agent1 at ShatteredPlatters.com> wrote in message
> news:3d723305 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:33pm
I'll pretend that made some sense and just continue on...
While I agree that Linn should have kept a message like this to email, I
also agree with Johnny that Eep didn't have to be so forceful about it.
Perhaps rather than berate her for it, he could have given her Daphne's
email address so that it wouldn't happen in the future. But then, I
suppose Eep could never grasp such a concept as "tact". :P
[View Quote]swe wrote:
> you acting stupid, or were you born that way? how can you compare a ad in
> the papers to the NGs? its like when someone wants to get something all his
> other friends get, and thier parents say "if your friends jump off a cliff,
> would you?"
>
> SWE
> -just found out he can post in the NGs again
> "agent1" <Agent1 at ShatteredPlatters.com> wrote in message
> news:3d723305 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> and/or
>
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
There are other ways to solve problems besides yelling...
robrod at prism.net
Sep 1, 2002, 2:33pm
Posting a private message in a public newsgroup is a waste of time for every person that has to read
it (other than the intended recipient, of course...). I don't care one way or the other what someone
has to say to someone else.
-Agent1
[View Quote]swe wrote:
> you acting stupid, or were you born that way? how can you compare a ad in the papers to the NGs?
> its like when someone wants to get something all his other friends get, and thier parents say "if
> your friends jump off a cliff, would you?"
>
> "agent1" <Agent1 at ShatteredPlatters.com> wrote in message
> news:3d723305 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:40pm
but, agent1 was saying they shouldnt, even if tgrams are blocked, and the
e-mail is unknown...
[View Quote]"shred" <alexraven at 1starnet.com> wrote in message
news:3d724105 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The newsgroups have never been, and never will be, a proper place for
*personal* communication. Newsgroups are, by design, a medium for public
announcements and group discussion. Personal communications do not belong
here, especially when other modes for said communication are available.
>
> swe wrote:
in
his
cliff,
with
reason
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:41pm
well, it said to daphne, your name daphne? didnt think so. so dont read it
[View Quote]"agent1" <webmaster at shatteredplattersDOTcom> wrote in message
news:3d724163$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Posting a private message in a public newsgroup is a waste of time for
every person that has to read
> it (other than the intended recipient, of course...). I don't care one way
or the other what someone
> has to say to someone else.
>
> -Agent1
>
> swe wrote:
in the papers to the NGs?
and thier parents say "if
with your message because
to one person in a
messagenews:3d722b09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
than it does in a newsgroup.
and/or the person they are
would be the next best
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:56pm
Good point SWE... Or perhaps linn posted the very message in the newsgroups
(general discussion mind you... at least it wasn't in community, or this
thread would be two times longer), in order to tell everyone - not just
Daphne "Hey, ok.. I made a mistake, and I am sorry I made such a big deal
over an error in judgement on my part." Is that really so bad? If so, you
could always do as SWE said, and when you see a message saying "To so and
so", you could just not read it with the intent to flame the poor person
because they posted a two line message that is in your mind... out of
bounds....
Poseidon
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d724326 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well, it said to daphne, your name daphne? didnt think so. so dont read it
> "agent1" <webmaster at shatteredplattersDOTcom> wrote in message
> news:3d724163$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> every person that has to read
way
> or the other what someone
ad
> in the papers to the NGs?
get,
> and thier parents say "if
> with your message because
messages
> to one person in a
> messagenews:3d722b09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> than it does in a newsgroup.
> and/or the person they are
> would be the next best
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 2:57pm
Not to mention it's general.discussion. Anything goes as long as it falls under AW's
terms of service and guidelines.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d724326 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well, it said to daphne, your name daphne? didnt think so. so dont read it
|
Sep 1, 2002, 3:00pm
your words are wise :)
[View Quote]"poseidon" <doubleagentjsr at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3d7246ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Good point SWE... Or perhaps linn posted the very message in the
newsgroups
> (general discussion mind you... at least it wasn't in community, or this
> thread would be two times longer), in order to tell everyone - not just
> Daphne "Hey, ok.. I made a mistake, and I am sorry I made such a big deal
> over an error in judgement on my part." Is that really so bad? If so, you
> could always do as SWE said, and when you see a message saying "To so and
> so", you could just not read it with the intent to flame the poor person
> because they posted a two line message that is in your mind... out of
> bounds....
>
> Poseidon
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3d724326 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
it
> way
> ad
> get,
paper
> messages
email/telegrams
e-mail
this
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 3:40pm
no one asked you eep thanks anyway but i dont need your advice
[View Quote]"eep" <eepNOSPAM at tnlc.com> wrote in message
news:3D7202C9.175CAC23 at tnlc.com...
> Er, ever heard of email or telegrams? No need to post this crap
here...unless you're THAT desperate for attention or to somehow be
"forgiven" by people who don't give 2 shits and a piss anyway...<roll eyes>
>
> linn wrote:
>
was
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 3:43pm
LOL then all those ty's i have seen??? did yall flame them about those ?? no
its always me sheeshh what a bunch of dorks
[View Quote]"shred" <alexraven at 1starnet.com> wrote in message
news:3d724105 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The newsgroups have never been, and never will be, a proper place for
*personal* communication. Newsgroups are, by design, a medium for public
announcements and group discussion. Personal communications do not belong
here, especially when other modes for said communication are available.
>
> swe wrote:
in
his
cliff,
with
reason
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 3:44pm
thats funny if you dont care why you reading this??
[View Quote]"agent1" <webmaster at shatteredplattersDOTcom> wrote in message
news:3d724163$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Posting a private message in a public newsgroup is a waste of time for
every person that has to read
> it (other than the intended recipient, of course...). I don't care one way
or the other what someone
> has to say to someone else.
>
> -Agent1
>
> swe wrote:
in the papers to the NGs?
and thier parents say "if
with your message because
to one person in a
messagenews:3d722b09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
than it does in a newsgroup.
and/or the person they are
would be the next best
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 3:45pm
nope was not MY mistake but thanks anyway
[View Quote]"poseidon" <doubleagentjsr at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3d7246ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Good point SWE... Or perhaps linn posted the very message in the
newsgroups
> (general discussion mind you... at least it wasn't in community, or this
> thread would be two times longer), in order to tell everyone - not just
> Daphne "Hey, ok.. I made a mistake, and I am sorry I made such a big deal
> over an error in judgement on my part." Is that really so bad? If so, you
> could always do as SWE said, and when you see a message saying "To so and
> so", you could just not read it with the intent to flame the poor person
> because they posted a two line message that is in your mind... out of
> bounds....
>
> Poseidon
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3d724326 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
it
> way
> ad
> get,
paper
> messages
email/telegrams
e-mail
this
>
>
|
Sep 1, 2002, 3:47pm
no one asked you linn thanks anyway but i dont need your personal messages
[View Quote]linn wrote:
> no one asked you eep thanks anyway but i dont need your advice
|
Sep 1, 2002, 4:00pm
oh sorry agent i thought that was pointed to eep guess you missed that
[View Quote]"agent1" <webmaster at shatteredplattersDOTcom> wrote in message
news:3d7252c7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> no one asked you linn thanks anyway but i dont need your personal
messages
>
>
> linn wrote:
>
|
Sep 2, 2002, 2:00am
[View Quote]On 1 Sep 2002 14:00:34 -0400, "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote:
|
>oh sorry agent i thought that was pointed to eep guess you missed that
Incased you somehow missed it, this is a public forum; anybody is free to reply to anybody's post.
Sep 2, 2002, 4:39am
Those people have nothing better to do than picking a person to flame at,
it's obviously what they do for fun.
This thread proves it once more than those people have no respect at all.
Sep 2, 2002, 5:54am
thanks cause it was just a simple thank you note which I have seen
everywhere on here by others :-)
[View Quote]"ncc 72897" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3d730788 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Those people have nothing better to do than picking a person to flame at,
> it's obviously what they do for fun.
> This thread proves it once more than those people have no respect at all.
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2002, 3:34pm
Obviously if daphne has been helping her then why didnt she say thanks to her then and not on the NG and try to cover it up with a no other way story?
- Mark
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3d7242e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> but, agent1 was saying they shouldnt, even if tgrams are blocked, and the
> e-mail is unknown...
> "shred" <alexraven at 1starnet.com> wrote in message
> news:3d724105 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *personal* communication. Newsgroups are, by design, a medium for public
> announcements and group discussion. Personal communications do not belong
> here, especially when other modes for said communication are available.
> in
> his
> cliff,
> with
> reason
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2002, 4:50pm
Because I was very tired and trying to play a game of Spades and I told her
so!!!! Linn and her unending whining, even after explaining over and over,
finally pissed me off so I set my telegram options to not accept any
telegrams from her till the next day... As IF it was any of YOUR business,
SR... Now go make another plan to take over AWTeen or go back to the Gate
and spread your misinformation... That's what YOU are good at...
Sep 3, 2002, 6:03pm
IM also good at physics, maths, Quantum mechanics, and about 50 other things :)
[View Quote]"daphne" <Daphne at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3d75045d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Because I was very tired and trying to play a game of Spades and I told her
> so!!!! Linn and her unending whining, even after explaining over and over,
> finally pissed me off so I set my telegram options to not accept any
> telegrams from her till the next day... As IF it was any of YOUR business,
> SR... Now go make another plan to take over AWTeen or go back to the Gate
> and spread your misinformation... That's what YOU are good at...
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2002, 6:50pm
Build a warp drive then....I bet you know nothing about quantum
mechanics....bragging lil kid!
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d7515a7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> IM also good at physics, maths, Quantum mechanics, and about 50 other
things :)
>
>
> "daphne" <Daphne at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3d75045d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
her
over,
business,
Gate
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2002, 7:14pm
He was joking, dumbass. Here, have another chill pill. *pop*
[View Quote]ncc 72897 wrote:
> Build a warp drive then....I bet you know nothing about quantum
> mechanics....bragging lil kid!
>
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3d7515a7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> things :)
>
>
> news:3d75045d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> her
>
> over,
>
> business,
>
> Gate
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Looks like Daphne could use one too!
robrod at prism.net
|
