|
|
m a r c u s // User Search
m a r c u s // User Search
Jun 5, 2001, 2:42am
I go there and I don't see the GET signs. You will have to make a screen
shot.
I see the trash can, but how would someone know to click on that?
Put a sign, a real sign with the words "REPORT PORN HERE"
So far I see no such sign
[View Quote]"just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1c61b6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> At Alpha World Ground Zero is a PK sign with a web link, and the PK page
has
> a web link to the GET.
>
> Also at Alpha World Ground Zero is a trash can with the GETs web address
> where there is a form to fill in to get trash removed.
>
> At TheGate and Alpha World are PKs and GKs - most of whom know about the
> existance of the GET.
>
> I have used the form three times and in each case what I wanted removed
was
> removed. Two times it took under 2 days... and in the other it was a
much
> larger borderline case where the GET wanted to hear the opinion of the
> original builder first, so that took a little longer.
>
> So Marcus - if you want the porn removed fill in the form. Stop your
> nonsense here, learn and move on.
>
> Note also, that as much as you may complain that it should be an "instant
> service", things just don't work that way. Things have to be recorded and
> justified for future reference. The last thing we want is a GET member
gone
> wild on deleting things. And I'm sure Factor has more than enough to do
> than doing the work of another team that are doing their job.
>
> Regards, Justin
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1c4aee$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> anything
FORMS,
> think
democracy,
but
> one
for
> means,
work
> sign
> people
> and
> any
> which
> on
would
the
|
> user
> email
> Content
and
the
> sole
> all
or
way
concerned
>
>
Jun 5, 2001, 5:35pm
It looks like I am replying to him on the surface, but if anyone with a
brain working for Active Worlds is reading this they will realize that the
comments are more direceted at them since they are the ones who can do
something here. No one here posting babble can, which is why they babble.
Active Worlds, Those who find porn to report are not going to all of a
sudden know a url out in the web to fill out a form, nor are they going to
know to click a picture/3d object of a trash can. You have huge signs at GZ,
why not add one that says "REPORT PORN HERE".
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1c63a9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I told you to block him Marcus, lolol He ain't worth replying to bud, lol
> Just work with the people that are trying to help you now that they are
all
> stirred up about it and get some of what you want done, that's the best
> advice I can give you and stop answering these morons they aren't the ones
> that are going to get the job done. They are defending something that is
> clearly stated in AW's rules to be removeable and you have the right to
> report it and not only report it as a Citizen you have the right to demand
> it be removed. You started this thing now don't turn your back on the ones
> that are now trying to help you, work with them and see what can be
> accomplished. :)
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1c48bf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yourself,
threaten
>
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 6:40pm
911 and GET? LOL, now I see why there was a posting about straws, keep
reaching.
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b1d3ec4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Would you know about 911 if you weren't educated? THANK YOU, COME AGAIN.
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d3474$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
babble.
to
GZ,
lol
are
best
ones
is
to
demand
ones
that
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 7:35pm
You don't have commericals telling people about 911? Since AW doesn't have
commercials, a sign telling people would be a good alternative. Putting a
URL on the web and a trash can to signify it doesn't help those who don't
know where to go to.
A sign saying "Report Porn Here" would allow those who can read, which I
understand some of you don't do too well, a means to report it without
having someone tell them "click the trash can".
If you must have the stupid trash can, put a sign there saying "click trash
can to report porn". It's one sign, not many like you are presenting.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D4EE1.748F2727 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> I must say, Marcus, you display a stunning ability to completely miss the
point.
> Granted, Wing's explanation wasn't exactly the most precise way of putting
it, so let
> me see if I can clear things up for you:
>
> The point Wing was trying to get across was that, in the real world, you
don't see
> huge signs all over the place saying "Call 911 to report crime!". You have
to be told
> who to call and what information to give. If you don't educate yourself on
how the
> system works, then you have no right to complain when the system doesn't
work the way
> you want it to.
>
> While we're at it, let's go back to another point you made previously
where you said
> "There should be no red tape, they should just see the porn and remove
it." Tell me,
> if you were walking down the street and saw some graffiti on a wall, what
would you
> do? Find a cop and tell him/her? Ok, but would you then expect the cop to
run to
> their car, grab a can of paint, and paint over it for you? Of course not.
They would
> file a report and make sure it got into the hands of the people who are
best equipped
> to handle the problem. (in this case, the sanitation department) It's how
the system
> works in the real world, and that's how it works here.
>
> And before you start saying "But then why didn't the PKs *do* that and
tell GET?",
> you *still* haven't told us exactly who it was you told about this
problem. Why?
> Maybe if you told us, we'd be more inclined to help you out. If all you
did was talk
> to one guy claiming to be a PK and then waited around for a month, then
you have
> absolutely no argument.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
AGAIN.
with a
that
do
a
going
signs at
bud,
they
the
that
right
to
the
be
Relax
scale
people
>
> --
> Goober King
> Guess he thinks we can't handle the truth!
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 5, 2001, 7:38pm
As far as missing the point, I got porn out of Active Worlds. What did you
do to help in the matter?
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D4EE1.748F2727 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> I must say, Marcus, you display a stunning ability to completely miss the
point.
> Granted, Wing's explanation wasn't exactly the most precise way of putting
it, so let
> me see if I can clear things up for you:
>
> The point Wing was trying to get across was that, in the real world, you
don't see
> huge signs all over the place saying "Call 911 to report crime!". You have
to be told
> who to call and what information to give. If you don't educate yourself on
how the
> system works, then you have no right to complain when the system doesn't
work the way
> you want it to.
>
> While we're at it, let's go back to another point you made previously
where you said
> "There should be no red tape, they should just see the porn and remove
it." Tell me,
> if you were walking down the street and saw some graffiti on a wall, what
would you
> do? Find a cop and tell him/her? Ok, but would you then expect the cop to
run to
> their car, grab a can of paint, and paint over it for you? Of course not.
They would
> file a report and make sure it got into the hands of the people who are
best equipped
> to handle the problem. (in this case, the sanitation department) It's how
the system
> works in the real world, and that's how it works here.
>
> And before you start saying "But then why didn't the PKs *do* that and
tell GET?",
> you *still* haven't told us exactly who it was you told about this
problem. Why?
> Maybe if you told us, we'd be more inclined to help you out. If all you
did was talk
> to one guy claiming to be a PK and then waited around for a month, then
you have
> absolutely no argument.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
AGAIN.
with a
that
do
a
going
signs at
bud,
they
the
that
right
to
the
be
Relax
scale
people
>
> --
> Goober King
> Guess he thinks we can't handle the truth!
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 5, 2001, 10:49pm
5 year old? :::snicker:::
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b1d7bf8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> A sign saying "Report Porn Here" would be found FAR more offensive by FAR
more people than the porn itself. Especially if in plain
> sight. Can you imagine one of the 5 year olds saying "MOMMY, WHAT'S PORN?"
>
> Adding to another problem instead of contributing to the solution.
>
> Also, since when are there 911 commercials when it's taught in preschool?
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d5099$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
have
a
don't
trash
the
putting
you
have
yourself on
doesn't
what
to
not.
are
how
you
then
keep
realize
can
they
all of
they
to
the
aren't
something
right
on
can
a
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:23am
Read the posts goober, I have told many people in many places who I
contacted. If I didn't, there wouldn't be a number of people objecting to
the fact I reported in the first place cause there wouldn't be posts to read
about this.
Your logic and ignorance of the fact I do post is either a "game" as you put
it, or a total lack of ability to follow a thread. Do you just look for
responses to your posts or do you actually read the content within the
threads on this Newsgroup to see the information you are seeking? Cause it
is there.
If you expect people who never reported porn to AW to all of a sudden know
the "game" and go to a url out on the web or know to click a trash can to
fill out a form, then I can surely expect you to read threads of messages
where you don't have to go to outside information. It's all on this NG area
and no URL's are hidden. I won't make you go somewhere else to contact me.
You can just do it here and feel comfortable that I will respond here,
unlike Inactiveworlds who prefers to sit there doing nothing.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D91FB.8A7B0A8 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Woo for you, here's a cookie. You saved us all from that dastardly porn!
Let your
> name be shouted from the highest mountain!!
>
> What does it matter what I did or did not do? This isn't my problem, it's
yours. What
> *I* have a problem with is the fact that you seem to think AWCom should be
held
> responsible because you failed to learn how to "play the game", as it
were. It's not
> their fault that you click in the right place.
>
> And, yet again, you've succeeded in avoiding actually telling us who it
was you
> contacted. Why can't you answer this simple question? Is it because you,
in fact, did
> get the proper replies and you just didn't use them? What is there to
hide? If these
> PKs wronged you so, then it should be a simple matter to point the finger
and say
> "This guy and this guy and this guy all ignored me!" If you give us that
info, you
> can be sure those people will be dealt with.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
you
the
putting
you
have
yourself on
doesn't
what
to
not.
are
how
you
then
>
> --
> Goober King
> Thinks maybe he should start mentioning who he contacted at the beginning
of the
> post...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:38am
Ask a friend, maybe they can help you find the email addresses. Class, turn
to chapter 2 "How to teach Goober how to read"
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D97A4.538FD4B3 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> That's just it, chief. You *never* told *anyone* here in the NG who you
contacted. I
> have read *every* single post in all these threads (unlike some people)
And not once
> did I see you say "I showed it to PeaceKeeper <insert number here> and he
didn't do
> anything" or "I emailed abuse/support/facter/whoever at activeworlds.com and
never got
> back a reply". All you said was that you "contacted people" and you never
heard back
> from them. It's very easy to be ignorant of the facts when they aren't
even
> presented! So let's see 'em!
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
to
read
put
it
know
to
messages
area
me.
porn!
it's
should be
it
you,
finger
that
did
miss
world,
You
previously
remove
wall,
cop
course
who
It's
and
all
>
> --
> Goober King
> What, does he live in these NGs or something?
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:33am
Considering the principle of the issue, I reported porn to 2 bodies of
people. One responded that wasn't associated with Inactiveworlds in any way
shape or form to remove the porn and they apparently closed the account
holding the porn. However, the contacts I did make in April associated with
Active Worlds did absolutely nothing to help in the removal of the porn.
Going on that, any reasonable person who wants porn out of Active Worlds
would most likely concur that my "cause" is a good cause and support its
actions. I personally don't see it as my "cause". I am sure there are
others who don't even read this NG who feel it is their "cause" as well to
help remove porn from Active Worlds.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1DA1CF.7881305 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Don't you just love it when people seem to think you actually care when
they filter
> you? I guess it helps their ego or something... *cough*Eep*cough*
>
> And coming from someone who spent practically an entire month using a
website as a
> front to attack one single person, that's not saying much. When it comes
to "moronic
> idiotic assinine" posts, you take the cake, my friend.
>
> I must confess, however, that it makes me wonder. Why is it that Chuck is
so quick to
> defend Marcus? Chuck was in no way, shape, or form involved in this whole
incident,
> yet he's constantly cheering on Marcus' "cause" and is always the first
person to
> step in and defend Marcus' integrity. Perhaps it's because he managed to
lose *his*
> integrity, and needs some other cause to try and redeem himself? Or maybe
he thinks
> he's "pulling a Jeiden" and fighting for the underdog? Who knows. Only one
man can
> answer that question, and he most likely wouldn't even answer it anyway.
Yea, I
> realize he probably won't read this, but I could care less. 'Tis merely
just musing
> on my part for the rest of the community to ponder... Anyone else care to
take a
> guess?
>
> chucks party wrote:
reading
porn!
it's
should be
it
you,
finger
that
did
miss
world,
You
previously
remove
wall,
cop
course
who
It's
and
all
>
> --
> Goober King
> And the silence continues to grow...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 11:24am
Well,it may carry other issues as you mention. However simply put, they
(AWCOM) need info to monitor. I want to make sure they get it. Emailing me
back saying they got would help me make sure they got it. Then they can do
whatever they want with this person, whether it be nothing or check other
reports against their account and then take proper action that they see fit.
I won't play dumb and say that is the only thing, but the response in email
is AT LEAST one of the things I was bringing about through my dogged
persistence in here and in email and in forms, and to the servers holding
the porn.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1E2E2F.994ABB36 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> nggggg >_< For someone who claims to be all about protecting the
community, you're
> not very interested in actually *listening* to that community! Our problem
isn't that
> he's making porn an issue. Frankly, I think that porn removal should be
discussed,
> since it's obvious that the system isn't that "user-fiendly". If anything,
all these
> threads have served to educate everyone else on how the system works, (I
say everyone
> *else* since it seems Marcus, the target of this information, refuses to
accept it)
> and they'll learn what *not* to do.
>
> Our problem stems from the fact that Marcus seems to think AWCom should be
held
> responsible for his ignorance. I'll agree that the system could be a bit
more clear,
> but that probably would only happen if miraculously every single org in AW
decided to
> link up to every other org in AW. And considering the interests of the
people that
> would be involved, I doubt that'll happen any time soon. But when Marcus
starts
> sending emails to AWCom *just* to see if they'll reply back, then the
issue has
> ceased to be about porn, and instead has turned into simple, underhanded
baiting. Now
> his only interest is in proving AWCom wrong. That was the "cause" I was
speaking of,
> and the "cause" Chuck seems so quick to defend.
>
> Oh, and Chuck, if you happen to read this, you probably should know that
any respect
> you may have had in this NG is now gone thanks to that last post of yours.
That post
> right there proves that you don't care about the community. All you cared
about was
> getting Just In out of AW because you felt it would make AW safer somehow.
Once Just
> In was gone, you'd probably never be heard from again. This, ladies and
gentlemen, is
> what we refer to as a "hypocrite". :)
>
> chucks party wrote:
deserved
trusted by
the
done.
to
it
all
a
all
from
use
is
>
> --
> Goober King
> Now you know *why* they are the underdogs...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 7:34pm
If Active Worlds (working from USA) is going to go out of laws that USA has,
then sure. You have a good position if we are trying to go in that
direction.
I assume since they are in USA, people would be required the rules in USA
(when in Rome, do as the Romans do). If Holland wants to make a Holland
version of Active Worlds, making it possible to expose whatever pornography
material to children there, then I for one will obey their rules when and if
I ever sign on to thier service by not objecting.
[View Quote]"moria" <moria at colony.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3b1e54d0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> of course, if you were based in somewhere like Holland (for example) and
> stored your pictures on a Dutch server, then you wouldn't have a problem
> with pictures of naked people, and if someone deleted it without checking
> first, they would be the ones in trouble:)) Even in the UK, its possible
to
> display adult mags next to the candy in a newsagent, its just not
permitted
> to sell the mag to anyone under 18, but you can display the cover, which
> agreed is less explicit than the insides of the mag, but is still
nudity:))
>
> Moria
>
>
> goober king <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B1E2E2F.994ABB36 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
>
> . Frankly, I think that porn removal should be discussed,
anything,
> all these
> say everyone
> accept it)
>
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 7:51pm
I think you chewed on some of the content behind your message, it's all
garbled. Can you re-type it making it more coherent please?
[View Quote]"icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
news:3B1EA497.746C1452 at altavista.net...
> I would do a US laws with a brand of Roman and Dutch on top This is
> really intop_hic LOL
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
has,
USA
pornography
and if
and
problem
checking
possible
which
works, (I
refuses to
|
Jun 5, 2001, 6:45pm
You have such a command of the english language.
If we can't moderate our own area in the NG, then we end up with people
posting off topic and people trying to moderate.
Why do this? Just put in a feature to allow members to moderate their own
area and if someone posts off topic you can take matters into your own hand
then instead of showing off your cussing skills.
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B1D39D7.67CD83DA at tnlc.com...
> QUIT POSTING OFF-TOPIC FUCKWIT
>
> avenger wrote:
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 7:46pm
I am noting the effects of a Newsgroup that doesn't allow us to have our own
area which is:
People will post off topic remarks, and others will try to moderate like you
are with me and Eep was doing with avenger.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D50A8.183DECBA at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> You seem to have a lack of understanding as to how these NGs function, so
allow me to
> enlighten you:
>
> There are no "areas" in this NG. It's not as if Eep can say "Hey, this is
my corner
> of the community NG, and I don't want any off-topic stuff in it!" We all
share these
> NGs equally and there's no such thing as territory. In fact, the only
thing that
> could qualify as an "area" would be your own personal computer and the
threads that
> you choose to download to it. If that's what you're referring to, then
this "feature"
> you seek already exists. It's called "filtering". If you see someone
posting
> something you don't want to read, simply add that person to your filter,
and you'll
> never hear from him/her again! That way, your "area" stays perfectly clean
and you'll
> never have to worry about encountering anything that could possibly do
anything to
> upset your precious internet experience.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
own
hand
into a
>
> --
> Goober King
> Note to Avenger: Next time, put [OT] in the subject...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 5, 2001, 9:30pm
With no moderator, the topic isn't really defined. All this says is
community. Would you prefer I post in Bots regarding non bots issues.
That would be off topic. So, I am here, and if I happen to annoy you, tough
shit. Get over it or ask for moderation.
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B1D65BA.5636285E at tnlc.com...
> Go to Andras' off-topic.* newsgroups if you want to post off-topic. Better
yet, go to the specific Usenet newsgroup your off-topic post will actually
be on-topic in! Think, twit...
>
> Quit being lame.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
own
you
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 9:34pm
If you were moderator and said "Marcus, that is off topic please continue
talking about A (A=topic). Chances are I would refrain from continuing that
line of conversation and stick to what you want to have addressed.
You aren't a moderator though, so you can't tell people what is and isn't
off topic and expect them to take you seriously. Again, if that happens to
annoy you, tough shit ignore me. Get over it or ask for moderation.
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B1D6543.7CD3BB8B at tnlc.com...
> Um, and how does one take matters into their own hands (people have 2, you
know, so it's plural)? I did it by responding the way I did. <shrug> If
people are going to continue to be putzes and post off-topic than they're
going to have to put up with negative responses to their drivel.
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
own
hand
into a
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:54am
LOL, there's the spirit
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B1D9ACA.3490E44C at tnlc.com...
> Nah, I'll simply "moderate" this newsgroup like I always have: by bashing
the idiot off-topic posters. Wanna be the first one, dipshit? Oops, looks
like you already are. Get ready for a VERY hostile newsgroup if you twits
keep it up...
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
>
tough
Better
actually
our
like
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:47am
eep, is your name initials for "entirely excessive puke"?
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B1DA6FA.9E9E1E98 at tnlc.com...
> NO ONE CARES TAKE IT TO EMAIL YOU TWITS
>
> chucks party wrote:
>
you
post
world
not.
straw
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 2:44am
And anyone else who is reading :-)
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1db39a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> oops nearly forgot if you do sign up please put www.jeiden.com as your
> referrer. Gives me a free extra month of service.
>
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1db34e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> think
> an
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 8:20pm
Sent on - Date: 6/5/01 6:17:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
First 2 attempts provided no response from Inactiveworlds.
Jun 5, 2001, 10:48pm
I am testing the waters now, I was told to email, and so far 3 emails have
been sent.
We'll see. All I had to do with the server holding the porn was email once
and it was removed.
A lot of work here just to remove 2 pictures, but we'll see.
Will they respond or won't they?
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d70b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i would like to know how you "reported" it, Marcus
>
> Did you actually get off your high horse long enough to admit you now
know
> the correct procedure ( after everyone, painstakingly, and in words of one
> syllable, explained it to you ) and consent to actually FOLLOW it?
>
> By the way, there are links to the same information in AWSchool and any
> teacher or teachers aide could have passed on said information.
>
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 11:43pm
1 email to the server holding the porn so they can remove it is hardly a
crusade.
[View Quote]"moff piett" <piett at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d89bc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm wondering, why are you on this anti-porn crusade? Sure it's an
issue,
> but there are many other issues to crusade on. Porn is hardly a issue in
> aw. You're making it seem like there is some sort of out of control porn
> epidemic, children can't walk past GZ without seeing some sort of brutal
> rape scene, vast tracts of building space taken up by giant exposed tits.
> Are you just bored and need some great crusade to embark on? Does this
> crusade help you feel moraly superior to others? There is little or no
porn
> problems in aw, and even at its worst not enough to warrent such a
> passionate responce from you.
>
> Also, we all know about your crusade, what you believe in, and what you
> want done about it. You've made that VERY clear. Now WHY do you continue
> to argue and post on the NG for all to read? You've informed the
community,
> and now please leave us out of your crusade and deal with it in private.
If
> you keep on going on like you are, you're going to make me want to spread
> porn through out AW.
>
> Am I the only one here that's heard enough of this? It's moved past the
> issue, and is now nothing than marcus trying to prove how moral he is and
> how big his soap box is. I'm begining to think he cares less about the
> "issue" and simply wants to shoot his mouth out and look like the
> porn-savior of aw.
>
> The porn issue has been delt with as far as it can on the NG's, PLEASE
MOVE
> ON.
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:02am
Fletch claims to read email from at least one of these sources
abuse at activeworlds.com and support at activeworlds.com.
Unless you read form mail, you won't see me doing the reporting.
[View Quote]"just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d8e5e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When I had trash removed by the GET they telegrammed me once they had done
> it.
>
> How come after so many people told you the correct procedure was to FILL
IN
> THE FORM ON THE GET WEB PAGE do you send an email to who-knows-who?
>
> BTW - who did you send the email too? And to whom did you send the
previous
> two emails? And what dates did you send the earlier emails? I'm sure
> Fletch or Tom would be glad to investigate what happened to these emails.
>
> Regards, Justin
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d7dcb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
have
> once
> one
any
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:26am
If it were my fault, why did the server holding the porn remove it?
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d9400 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Just as i thought. Its an issue calculated to get attention as some one
has
> previously stated. Just like the little boy that ran around with his eyes
> closed , yelling " I cant find it and its all some one elses fault!"
>
> Several ppl have repeatedly given you the link and the url and the facts,
> and regardless of whether you had the sense to go look in the right places
> previously, you now KNOW where to go and you have as yet to email the
> correct place or submit your request to the right ppl, but you continue
> whipping the dead horse of your outraged, misplaced self rightousness.
>
>
> *sigh*
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d8f3b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:30am
"Granted, if they were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do
something about it."
Wanting to do something is wonderful, I want to rid aids, cancer, diabetes,
etc.. all the bad things. However, removing porn is something we can do.
Let's ALL work together on this instead of trying to shoot the peron who is
trying to help remove it.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D95A2.A5259199 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> See, that's the thing. I think I've figured out what Marcus is trying to
do here.
> He's not concerned about porn at all. The only thing he seems to care
about is
> proving that AWLD will not do what he thinks they should be doing. He
seems to think
> that AWCom should be the ones cleaning up trash in AW. The only problem is
he fails
> to realize that it's not AWCom's responsibility to clean up porn. Granted,
if they
> were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do something about
it. But the
> act of removing said porn is NOT in their job description. That's what GET
is for.
> And even though he's been bombarded with messages telling him how to do
things the
> correct way, he refuses to take the advice and simply repeats what he's
said all
> along: "It's AW's fault, not mine!"
>
> As I mentioned in a previous post, I'd swear Chuck was training him. The
parallels
> between this mess and the whole SAW fiasco are just disturbing...
>
> moff piett wrote:
issue,
in
porn
brutal
tits.
porn
you
continue
community,
If
spread
and
MOVE
>
> --
> Goober King
> Lord knows we need *another* one of those things...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:49am
LOL, yea, that's it. I never tried other means. Listen idiot, I emailed
the server that held the porn and they had it removed fairly instantly in
May.
I spent the month of April reporting it to Active Worlds before I went to
the server. Why? I didn't want the account closed that held the porn. I
just wanted those 2 pics to be removed. However, the server that held the
porn did close the account, not just remove the porn. So, there you have
it. I went out of Inactiveworld's system, and I got the job done.
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d991f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> He's only trying to shoot you because you haven't tried any other ways to
> get rid of it. Sending e-mails to AWCom is not the only way. :)
>
> SW Chris
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d95c7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
do
> diabetes,
do.
> is
to
problem
> is
> Granted,
about
|
> GET
do
he's
The
issue
> this
> no
what
> private.
> the
is
> the
> PLEASE
>
>
Jun 6, 2001, 1:16am
Not til now, LOL. He just snuck into this without reading the posts.
Probably too busy working on SW City, great place.
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3b1d9fb8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chris isn't an idiot..... :-\
>
> m a r c u s <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d9a56 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
emailed
in
to
I
the
have
> to
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:35am
Why are people responding?
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b1da433 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm sorry, I did read every post, but yours are so long that I must have
> missed something. Anyways, if you've already taken care of the problem,
> what in the hell are you doing still e-mailing AWcom and bothering this NG
> for? huh!? >:(
>
> SW Chris
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1da092 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
instantly
went
porn.
held
> ways
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 3:37am
I agree, I went there just now and I noticed SAW is looking really good as
well as the improvements MSN has done.
[View Quote]"jfk2" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:90B8B387jfk2jfkmusiccom at news.activeworlds.com...
> Well... I can also vouch for Chucks Party there...
> I've seen SAW & it is 100% still there
> and right now [last time i looked that is] it contained a few names...
> 2 of those names and their respective CIT #'s sometimes post here &
> the other one i don't think has ever posted in the ngs yet.
>
> chucks party <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in
> <3b1da2a9 at server1.Activeworlds.com>:
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 7:48am
Either the person has clothes on or they don't, that is not a hard one to
spot. They even made a term for it "birthday suit", when you don't have any
clothes on.
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:3b1df435 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hummm and by who s standards do we judge all this "smut"?mmm?
> "just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d8e5e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
done
> IN
> previous
emails.
> have
now
of
> any
>
>
|
|
