|
m a r c u s // User Search
m a r c u s // User Search
Sep 2, 2001, 2:49pm
I didn't refuse any offer for refund. That is not true. I will accept the
refund. That is the whole point in me bringing it up in Jan, it's the
reason I brought it up in NG earlier on, and it is why I am here now
discussing it.
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b923734$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This will be my last post on the issue as you are obviously too dense to
understand the "premise" of AW's pricing system.
>
> The world costs $80 and includes a GIFT citizenship. Your current
citizenship (that you're using to post) cost you $20. If you want to buy a
world, you pay the same price as everyone else and recieve the same gift as
everyone else. Flagg said he offered to make your citizenship the one that
is associated with the world and refund your money that you had already
spent on the citizenship. You apparently declined and countered with an
insane offer.
>
> Since you won't even except what you're demanding, I think you should just
do everyone a favor and shut up about the whole thing.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b919ad2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 2:51pm
If Active Worlds is going to refund my citizenships, let's see them do it!!
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b92237c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! don't you understand that those cits are
****FREE****,
> they aren't included in the price, you pay exactly $0.00 for the cits, but
> if the world costs $10, you pay exactly $10 (plus tax if applicable) FOR
THE
> WORLD **ITSELF**!! And he could've saved his 20 bucks anyway, if he had
> taken Flagg's offer...
>
> KAH
>
> "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91a830 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
$20
F
a
> me
can
> and
either.
I
you
> to
> that
> and
> button
> it
> the
world
you
> opinion,
to
> and
the
> World
https://www.activeworlds.com/ssl/buyworld/)
> *do*
> isn't
consumer.
you
> in
> which
your
> over
schemes
> your
costs.
is
> citizenship,
> citizenship
> but
> you
they
> you
> paying
> world,
to
> to
> than
> be
> bill
of
> GOING
forfeit
> my
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:25pm
"He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day"
Then he should have asked for $60 not $80, because I paid $20 already. Do
the math 80-20=60, 60 being the difference owed.
If I made a file for someone and charged them $20, and they later they came
to me weeks after asking for me to make them a website I would take the file
I made them, use that in the website and charge them $20 less that what I
would have because they already paid for that file. I would create a new
file and charge them $20. Now that is being stubborn and that is what
Active Worlds is doing. They only want money, and they won't see that I
ALREADY PAID FOR A CITIZENSHIP, I don't need 2 just like the person may not
need 2 files I make them for their site.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b926658 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> read Flagg's post first (or use YOUR MEMORY, you know, that stuff you use
to
> remember things)... He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
> cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
> saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day... but because you're too
stubborn
> to care about anything else than your demand you obviously rejected the
> offer and have lost some money, AND probably some fun...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b926394$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it!!
> but
FOR
had
seems
for
> THE
> the
> building
> and
($80+$20)
> refunded
> on
> you
I
> truth
> Master?
> Flagg.
> says
for
kind
> of
> openly
a
and
> button,
the
BUT
button.
> Yes,
section
> of
their
suggest
> they
> option.
> try
> world
of
Personal
you
AWC
> for
on
that
> months)
> whining
in
are
up
and
This
> year,
> If
> world.
> money,
> probably
need
> anything
richer
should
> we
> free
> every
myself
than
> a
out
IS
things
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:26pm
CORRECTION - I would NOT HAVE created a new file and charge them $20 again.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b92cddc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "He offered to integrate your existing cit as the world
> cit, meaning it would be renewed when you renewed your world, and you'd
> saved your 20 bucks at the end of the day"
>
> Then he should have asked for $60 not $80, because I paid $20 already. Do
> the math 80-20=60, 60 being the difference owed.
>
> If I made a file for someone and charged them $20, and they later they
came
> to me weeks after asking for me to make them a website I would take the
file
> I made them, use that in the website and charge them $20 less that what I
> would have because they already paid for that file. I would create a new
> file and charge them $20. Now that is being stubborn and that is what
> Active Worlds is doing. They only want money, and they won't see that I
> ALREADY PAID FOR A CITIZENSHIP, I don't need 2 just like the person may
not
> need 2 files I make them for their site.
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b926658 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
use
> to
world
> stubborn
cits,
> FOR
> had
> seems
> for
SHUT
refunded
obvious:
world
> ($80+$20)
days"
people
so
> I
am.
message
that
> for
> kind
inform
> a
> and
a
> the
> BUT
> button.
the
situation.
> section
a
> their
> suggest
and
of
all
> of
> Personal
> you
> AWC
away
world
> on
> that
newsgroup
> in
> are
see
issue
> up
> and
> This
citizenships.
that
me
a
> need
> richer
> should
have
> myself
> than
> out
> IS
> things
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 2:43pm
Do you renew your driver's license for the next year 3 weeks after getting
this years license?
Now let me show you some basic math kah
Do the math(I rounded the numbers):
$80 (world with citizenship)
-$20 citizenship (already paid)
______________________________
$60 remaining balance (This is the situation NOW)
If I want to continue after the year, then I would renew. That is the point
of "renewing". You have COMPLETED one period of time, so you will then
RENEW. If I was going to pay for 2 years of one citizenship, I would have
to "RENEW", Active Worlds would have charged something like this:
$100 (world with just the citizenship for 2 years)
-$20 citizenship (already paid)
______________________________
$80 remaining balance (This is the situation I would be faced with
assuming Flagg was accurate in saying he made the offer you are presenting
back in Jan. How different is than me getting a world and a citizen at the
end of this year? It would still be $100. I just don't see how me paying
$100 upfront is going to save anything. I have only paid $20 now for this.
Looks like I saved $80 by Active Worlds not allowing me to buy a world for
$60.
I do not see an email, a NG post, nor do I see an .html page that reflects
the second scenario which doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. Why
would I want to pay 3 citizenship fees upfront(especially after having given
them $40 for 2 citizenships when I only needed 1)?
Now addressing renewal, you are 4 months early because I have til December
to "renew" anything. In January, it would have been 11 months. When you
renew something, you do it at the time period it is expiring, so I wouldn't
be looking or expecting any kind of renewal offer til around December of
2001 when I might get a notice from Active Worlds saying something like,
"Dear valued citizen (ROFL), we noticed your citizenship is about to expire,
would you like to renew your citizenship? To do so, blah blah blah"
In any event, I didn't want a renewal of something I didn't even use for a
month. That is rediculous. Do you renew your driver's license for the next
year 3 weeks after getting this years license?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b93aced$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You still aren't getting it are you? I'll tell you some AW basics... a
> citizenship ($19.95) only lasts for one (1) year, to continue to use a
> citizenship, you have to renew it (another $19.95 for another year). The
> free citizenships that come with worlds are renewed when the world is
> renewed (no $19.95 charged). So, when you had renewed your
**hypothetical**
> P10 world with a 5 user limit ($10 for another year), the attached
> citizenship would be renewed as well. So, if you had taken Flagg's offer
to
> attach your existing citizenship to your world, you wouldn't need to renew
> it anymore, the renewal would be free. So, even if you didn't get your
> $19.95 that you payed when you originally bought your citizenship, you
would
> have saved $19.95 every year. Ergo, you turned down an offer that would've
> done exactly what you wanted (even more), just not immediately. Now will
you
> shut up? I'm tired off showing you your stupidity...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92ce2f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> again.
you'd
> Do
the
what
> I
> new
I
may
> <<<<SNiP>>>>>
>
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 2:46pm
CORRECTION - Looks like I saved $80 by Active Worlds not allowing me to pay
the remaining portion ($60) which I haven't given them for a world costing
$80.
I would be more than happy to, now when is that offer going to cross the
table?
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b93b315$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Do you renew your driver's license for the next year 3 weeks after getting
> this years license?
>
> Now let me show you some basic math kah
>
> Do the math(I rounded the numbers):
>
> $80 (world with citizenship)
> -$20 citizenship (already paid)
> ______________________________
> $60 remaining balance (This is the situation NOW)
>
> If I want to continue after the year, then I would renew. That is the
point
> of "renewing". You have COMPLETED one period of time, so you will then
> RENEW. If I was going to pay for 2 years of one citizenship, I would have
> to "RENEW", Active Worlds would have charged something like this:
>
> $100 (world with just the citizenship for 2 years)
> -$20 citizenship (already paid)
> ______________________________
> $80 remaining balance (This is the situation I would be faced with
> assuming Flagg was accurate in saying he made the offer you are presenting
> back in Jan. How different is than me getting a world and a citizen at
the
> end of this year? It would still be $100. I just don't see how me paying
> $100 upfront is going to save anything. I have only paid $20 now for
this.
> Looks like I saved $80 by Active Worlds not allowing me to buy a world for
> $60.
>
> I do not see an email, a NG post, nor do I see an .html page that reflects
> the second scenario which doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. Why
> would I want to pay 3 citizenship fees upfront(especially after having
given
> them $40 for 2 citizenships when I only needed 1)?
>
> Now addressing renewal, you are 4 months early because I have til December
> to "renew" anything. In January, it would have been 11 months. When you
> renew something, you do it at the time period it is expiring, so I
wouldn't
> be looking or expecting any kind of renewal offer til around December of
> 2001 when I might get a notice from Active Worlds saying something like,
> "Dear valued citizen (ROFL), we noticed your citizenship is about to
expire,
> would you like to renew your citizenship? To do so, blah blah blah"
>
> In any event, I didn't want a renewal of something I didn't even use for a
> month. That is rediculous. Do you renew your driver's license for the
next
> year 3 weeks after getting this years license?
>
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b93aced$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> **hypothetical**
> to
renew
> would
would've
> you
> you'd
already.
they
> the
> what
a
what
that
> I
> may
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 6:00pm
I never said it was each year. However, I have to pay it at some point.
Whether I pay it now or when Active Worlds allows me to pay $60, using $20 I
already gave them for a world is the issue.
You seem to totally miss the boat here.
"In any event, I didn't want a renewal of something I didn't even use for a
month. That is rediculous. Do you renew your driver's license for the next
year 3 weeks after getting this years license?" - I think this sums it up
pretty well
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B93D06B.ED3F0EEE at yahoo.com...
> give it up filter him hes too stupid to get it hes
> even too stupid to reply in ONE message
> and marcus the 70 buck fee is a ONE TIME charge
> stop saying its 80 bucks a year
>
> kah wrote:
**hypothetical**
to
renew
would
would've
you
you'd
already.
they
the
what
a
what
that I
may
|
Sep 4, 2001, 2:49pm
I have said do the math several times, and to be equally fair here please
show me how you feel I am getting some "golden offer" and I will look at the
numbers. Just show the numbers, and show me the math cause I think that
will help you see I am not saving anything at all by simply "prepaying" 3
citizenships. I already tried showing you with what I paid, $20, and taking
that out of $80 for the cost of the cheapest world leaving $60. It seems
simple enough.
I have also tried to see where you are coming from by paying $120 to somehow
be golden for me. It just doesn't add up. A world cost $80, I have given
them $40. I wanted one of the citizenships to be applied towards a world
and be charged the difference ($60). They still would have received $100
total from me for 2 citizenships and a discounted world at $60. I have only
used the other citizenship for 5 hours, barely used. It was a waste of an
account and I wasn't able to use it effectively the way I intended. But
again, this has nothing to do with refunding $40 even though active worlds
gets to keep the extra citizenship. This has to do with simply letting me
use one of my citizenships in a world. That would have saved me money.
Refunding the extra citizenship would have been nice but I wouldn't have
asked for that. I would have given it to someone in the world if
Activeworlds gave me the discount on it. And who knows, that person may
have wanted to get a world of their own and that would have been 2 sales of
worlds Active Worlds missed out on. Now, enough of that, I'll wait to see
your logic in humbers why I am getting a golden offer by simply prepaying.
"where do you get the "3 citizen fees" thing?"
I bought 2 citizenships, you are arguing I should have bought a world at
FULL price which includes a citizenship and that would have been the third
citizenship. Well, I only need one. I don't have 3 computers or 2 bots use
for those accounts. Instead of 1 wasted citizenships, I would have had 2
wasted citizenships. When you make a mistake once, why do it twice? Why
not learn from it the first time.
Assuming my citizenships were only used to renew then I wouldn't have to
renew til December 2003 (3 citizenships: 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003).
Is this what flagg was offering? cause if he did I totally missed it, and
yes it would have been at least an opportunity. I don't know about golden
since it is merely prepayment without any deal like 25 for 3 year
citizenship. However, it would have shown that Active Worlds recognized I
signed up with their program and in doing so I didn't see a menu of choices
at the time of registering. I thought a citizenship and world were seperate
when in fact a world includes a citizenship and I WOULD NOT HAVE BOUGHT 2
citizenships. There was no reason for me LOOKING at the registration window
launched by the register now button to think I could get a world with a
citizenship saving me $20. It just isn't there and that is what I would
like active worlds do in the future.
You want to talk about golden opportunity, that is a "golden offer" HONESTY
and openness at the time and PLACE someone types in their credit card
number.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b94fa09 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *eyes open hugely* I can't BELIEVE how STUPID you are! When you went to
> school, did you get the note "Has no sense of logic and thinks only 5
> minutes ahead" on your mark-card? You really aren't getting it, are you?
> Man, you must have problems in your life if you can't get an idea as
simple
> as the one I gave you... shit, I nearly spelled it out for you! and you're
> STILL not getting it!!!!!!!!!! like, are you under the influence of a drug
> or something? where do you get the "3 citizen fees" thing? anyway, that
you
> bought 2 citizenships was your own fault! by integrating your main cit (I
> guess that would be your M a r c u s cit), you would NEVER have to renew
> that cit again, it would be renewed *****FREELY***** when you renewed your
> world! so, if you had a P10/5 users, you'd save a lotta money, you know!
> but, NOOOOOOOO, you didn't understand what a **GOLDEN** offer you were
> offered, because it wouldn't give you immediate result... oh, and you
really
> didn't get it, your cit would not be renewed from then (I'd guess), but
from
> when your world was about to expire... and you wouldn't have to pay ANY
> money at all for that cit, any more! If you're still not getting it, go
ask
> a sane person about this and I think you'd be surprised...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b93b315$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
getting
> point
have
presenting
> the
> this.
for
reflects
> given
December
you
> wouldn't
> expire,
a
> next
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2001, 4:26pm
correction; "I don't know about golden since it is merely prepayment without
any deal like 55 for 3 year citizenship."
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b950627$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have said do the math several times, and to be equally fair here please
> show me how you feel I am getting some "golden offer" and I will look at
the
> numbers. Just show the numbers, and show me the math cause I think that
> will help you see I am not saving anything at all by simply "prepaying" 3
> citizenships. I already tried showing you with what I paid, $20, and
taking
> that out of $80 for the cost of the cheapest world leaving $60. It seems
> simple enough.
>
> I have also tried to see where you are coming from by paying $120 to
somehow
> be golden for me. It just doesn't add up. A world cost $80, I have given
> them $40. I wanted one of the citizenships to be applied towards a world
> and be charged the difference ($60). They still would have received $100
> total from me for 2 citizenships and a discounted world at $60. I have
only
> used the other citizenship for 5 hours, barely used. It was a waste of an
> account and I wasn't able to use it effectively the way I intended. But
> again, this has nothing to do with refunding $40 even though active worlds
> gets to keep the extra citizenship. This has to do with simply letting me
> use one of my citizenships in a world. That would have saved me money.
> Refunding the extra citizenship would have been nice but I wouldn't have
> asked for that. I would have given it to someone in the world if
> Activeworlds gave me the discount on it. And who knows, that person may
> have wanted to get a world of their own and that would have been 2 sales
of
> worlds Active Worlds missed out on. Now, enough of that, I'll wait to see
> your logic in humbers why I am getting a golden offer by simply prepaying.
>
> "where do you get the "3 citizen fees" thing?"
> I bought 2 citizenships, you are arguing I should have bought a world at
> FULL price which includes a citizenship and that would have been the third
> citizenship. Well, I only need one. I don't have 3 computers or 2 bots
use
> for those accounts. Instead of 1 wasted citizenships, I would have had 2
> wasted citizenships. When you make a mistake once, why do it twice? Why
> not learn from it the first time.
>
> Assuming my citizenships were only used to renew then I wouldn't have to
> renew til December 2003 (3 citizenships: 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003).
> Is this what flagg was offering? cause if he did I totally missed it, and
> yes it would have been at least an opportunity. I don't know about golden
> since it is merely prepayment without any deal like 25 for 3 year
> citizenship. However, it would have shown that Active Worlds recognized I
> signed up with their program and in doing so I didn't see a menu of
choices
> at the time of registering. I thought a citizenship and world were
seperate
> when in fact a world includes a citizenship and I WOULD NOT HAVE BOUGHT 2
> citizenships. There was no reason for me LOOKING at the registration
window
> launched by the register now button to think I could get a world with a
> citizenship saving me $20. It just isn't there and that is what I would
> like active worlds do in the future.
>
> You want to talk about golden opportunity, that is a "golden offer"
HONESTY
> and openness at the time and PLACE someone types in their credit card
> number.
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b94fa09 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> simple
you're
drug
> you
(I
your
> really
> from
> ask
> getting
> have
> presenting
at
paying
> for
> reflects
Why
> December
> you
of
like,
for
> a
the
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2001, 10:52pm
No, that is not what I am saying. If you bought 4 citizenships and I was
activeworlds, and after 3 weeks you came to me requesting 1 ($20)
citizenship be used with the purchase of an $80 world, I would charge you
$60 and not give you a citizen with the world. One of the 4 would carryover
since you ALREADY PAID for that 1. The other 3 would be negotiable if you
bought a bigger world, thus giving me more money.
In my situation, I bought 2 citizenships. I wanted one to carryover into a
world without Activeworlds giving me a citizen with the world. I don't need
3, but would live with the fact I have the 2 I bought. Get it now?
[View Quote]"sir chaos" <sirchaos at wolfenet.com> wrote in message
news:3b9542d7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So what you are saying, m a r c u s, is that if I buy four Citizenships, I
> should get a World for free (as $20 * 4 = $80 "deducted from my world")?
>
> What a novel concept. If I buy said Cits for friends, would it count?
>
>
> -SC
>
|
Sep 4, 2001, 10:54pm
I did email, no response yet.
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b957699 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Then by God e-mail Flagg and let this whole thing end. :\
>
> SW Chris
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92632c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
to
a
> as
that
> just
>
>
|
Sep 5, 2001, 5:54pm
"when using your existing cit as the world cit, it would be renewed freely
whenever your world would be renewed!"
So, where is the world then? So far they have $40 of my money, and I have
no world.
"the cit wouldn't be counted in the price, you would've payed $10
every year, saving at least $10 bucks a year"
So if I bought a world, then I would I would have had 3 citizenships. I
only need 1, and I asked that they credit one of my existing citizenships.
Simple math, you only need one, so you use one of the 2 pre-existing
citizenships. I have already paid them $40 and I see no world.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b9671d8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what do you do for a living? sweep toilets? that may be more than you are
> able to do, I guess... the cheapest world costs **$10**, kiddo! and you
> still haven't gotten one word of what I'm telling ya! if AW had an IQ test
> when buying cits, you wouldn't have been here, you know! there is no Fing
> prepaying for 3 cits, blablabl, you gnome!when using your existing cit as
> the world cit, it would be renewed freely whenever your world would be
> renewed! the cit wouldn't be counted in the price, you would've payed $10
> every year, saving at least $10 bucks a year... like, what is your IQ
> anyway?
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b950627$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
please
> the
3
> taking
seems
> somehow
given
world
$100
> only
an
worlds
me
> of
see
prepaying.
third
> use
2
Why
2002-2003).
and
golden
I
> choices
> seperate
2
> window
> HONESTY
to
you?
> you're
> drug
that
> (I
renew
> your
know!
t
ANY
go
the
then
would
with
> at
> paying
for
world
> Why
having
When
December
> of
> like,
> for
> the
>
>
|
Sep 5, 2001, 5:58pm
"if you buy 4 cits, you get a world..."
Where does it say this?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b967218$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> wrong, you gnome! you are saying just that, if you buy 4 cits, you get a
> world...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b957761$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
was
you
> carryover
you
into
> a
> need
Citizenships,
> I
world")?
count?
>
>
|
Sep 6, 2001, 4:26pm
That is what I was trying to do in January. It's now September 6, and one
person so far gets it.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b97bb2d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> YOU'D STILL HAVE TWO!!!! BECAUSE YOUR
> FIRST CIT WOULD'VE BEEN MADE THE WORLD CIT, HAVEN'T YOU GOT IT YET, YOU
> IDIOTIC GNOME!!!???? And you could just let the other cit EXPIRE, and
never
> pay for that one again!!!!!!!!
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b968308 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
freely
have
citizenships.
> are
you
> test
> Fing
> as
> $10
look
> at
> that
> "prepaying"
and
> have
> of
> But
> letting
> money.
> have
> may
> sales
to
world
> at
> bots
> had
have
> to
it,
> recognized
> BOUGHT
registration
with
> a
> would
card
went
only
> 5
are
as
and
of
> a
> cit
> renewed
> were
> you
guess),
> bu
pay
it,
after
is
will
this:
> citizen
me
now
that
> sense.
til
I
something
about
> to
> blah"
> use
> for
>
>
|
Aug 31, 2001, 12:04am
If they inform the tourist at the time they get a citizenship they could
save money in the long run by getting a world, then the costs wouldn't seem
like a lot. It would mean $20 less than the initial cost.
If activeworlds is too stingy to save just $20 for their users, what makes
you think they will lower the costs of worlds accross the board? They get
who they can get addicted and charge up the wazooo. Sorry, but I ain't
getting addicted on this. You guys can milk their pockets.
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns910D8E5729426jfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> This is what he said in another message thread...
> And it is a news article on www.awnews.com with several comments about
> that as well... [at the site that they give you you should check it out
> as JFK2 posted a rather big 2 sign5.rwx's on that subject there]
>
> And is whey i would LOVE to see the world prices come down.
> SINCE i have allready paid for my cit I don't need another CIT in that
> world. If i want a few more cits FINE.... $19.95 for JFK2 Nurse, JFK2
> Secretary, JFK2 Wife, JFK2 Bookeeper, etc.... and in the long run it
> would make more $$$ revenue for Active Worlds that way while lowering
> the world prices so us folks can afford the BIGGER worlds so we can
> really do something. p50/15 or p80/30 or something.... It would help
> us out alot. AND all that price reduction might help other struggling
> universes that use AW technology to make it work & keep them up and
> running.[Vectorscape's Failure because in part HUGE world prices]
>
> ==================================================================
> Newsgroups: community
> Subject: Re: Value of a cit
> From: "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com>
>
> I didn't know was here to "express" myself. I am simply stating fact:
>
>
> A) worlds come with citizens
> b) activeworlds has a register button for citizenship and they don't
> have the teachers teach about worlds before a tourist buys a world.
>
> c) hence, a tourist buys a citizenship, then finds out about the world,
> and then ends up paying Active Worlds $20 more than they needed to when
> it comes to the purchase of a world of $80.
>
> If Activeworlds charged me $60 for a world and used the $20 I gave for
> the citizenship to be applied for the citizenship that would have come
> with the world, then I wouldn't be bringing this up over and over and
> over again.
>
> I will continue to bring this up over and over and over again until it
> is addressed. It doesn't matter how much research I do, how many
> people I talk, who can flame me the worst, I will continue to post here
> for as long as I can telling people about this FACT.
>
> It's not an expression, it is a fact. Common sense would tell the
> citizen to not pay a company that practices in deceptive practice like
> once they find out. Active Worlds has the greater knowledge and has
> the LEGAL responsibility to inform the consumer of the services with
> costs before they sign up and pay consideration for services. I was
> only informed of their citizenship through car salesman tactics. They
> put one guy out in the front GZ to bring in people to the teaching
> areas, and then they have teachers on call to sell citizenships like it
> was a car.
>
> Am I to blame the person who got me to buy a citizenship? no, but I
> could have been informed to buy a world with it saving me $20. At
> least then, a person could have the choice to actively refuse to not
> buy a world knowing the information before paying anything.
>
> The reality is, I would have paid them $80, I would have continued to
> develop a home in AW thus upgrading the worlds and giving Active Worlds
> money. They lost out on me in business and respect as a company who
> cares about their customers. Well, there's my rant.... (pick apart
> flamers, have fun missing the reality and chew on your addiction some
> more)
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8e6d9f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
Aug 31, 2001, 4:44am
Simple question, YES or NO:
When you registered for a citizenship and clicked the "Register Now!"
button, did it inform you that you could also buy a world which would incude
a citizenship?
All I want is a simple YES or NO, I don't need excuses or reasons why we
could have done other things. This is way they set it up, the programmers
made it so you would click a button to register if you were signed on as
tourist. Working with that method, did Active Worlds inform people when
registering about this fact regarding citizenships within a cost of a world?
If I had known I could have bought a world with citizenship, then I would
have bought that. Now my only choice is to buy a world which would come
with a citizenship I don't need.
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B8F1EFB.69CAD0AB at yahoo.com...
> uh marcus give it up they do inform them so far
> EVERY PERSON HERE knows about it so you obviously
> didnt do what the average person does and they
> HAVE lowered prices before a world used to cost
> around 800 when aw first started as far as i can
> remember and just about a year ago they reidid
> them across the board. thats why te page setup is
> different than the universes... get your facts
> straight for once sheesh
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
seem
makes
get
out
world,
when
here
it
Worlds
|
Aug 31, 2001, 3:35pm
NO NO, see http://members.aol.com/chessmusic/gcn/gcnmusic.htm (Best for
higher connections)
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b8fb988 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Please see the Issues and Trolls and Stonedeafs, Oh My! thread on the
> General.Discussion.
>
> --
> Chris
> Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master?
> http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
>
> "the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B8FB37D.B7452BEC at yahoo.com...
> incude
we
> programmers
as
when
> world?
> would
come
> could
> wouldn't
what
> They
> ain't
> about
> it
in
> that
Nurse,
> JFK2
run
> it
> lowering
> can
> help
> struggling
> and
prices]
==================================================================
> fact:
> don't
> world.
to
gave
> for
have
> come
over
> and
> until it
many
post
the
practice
> like
> has
> with
> was
> They
teaching
> like
but
> I
At
> not
continued
> to
> who
> apart
> some
>
>
|
Aug 31, 2001, 3:39pm
I am :-)
http://members.aol.com/chessmusic/gcn/gcnmusic.htm (Best for higher
connections)
[View Quote]"zero" <slavezero at dmonix.net> wrote in message
news:3b8f9d38$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Is it possible you people could whine a little more? Go use another
program
> if you are so unsatisfied.
> Man, I cant believe you all.
>
>
>
>
|
Aug 31, 2001, 11:51pm
So if you post a URL I can report you?
http://members.aol.com/chessmusic/gcn/gcnmusic.htm
If you want it, enjoy, if you don't DON'T CLICK
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b8fed7a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> We don't care. Post that link one more time and I WILL report you to your
> ISP.
> --
> Chris
> Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master?
> http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8fcbd7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 2, 2001, 5:48am
umm, they have no say so. This newsgroup is controlled by AW not my isp.
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3B91609B.B95BAC96 at andras.net...
> sw chris wrote:
> Send an email about his NG abuse to abuse at mediaone.net with forwarding one
of his posts with all headers (as I did it right now :)
>
> Andras
|
Sep 2, 2001, 10:31pm
I posted a link, and we are allowed to do that. That is pretty much the
point of the net to send links so we can share info. THEY EVEN MADE SEARCH
ENGINES WHICH WOULD MAKE THESE INSTANTLY. If there are to be punishments
given out for posting links then I want everyone tracked that emails me crap
that was not asked for or reasonably expected.
And finally, some people here object to posting pictures and HTML, they want
links instead. This isn't an argument for it but a defense that posting
links here to my knowledge is fine.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b92248b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yes, but your internet connection is controlled by your ISP, and if you
> abuse stuff on the internet, they'll cut you off...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b91e45b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
isp.
> one
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 2:56pm
You call that spam? I see 3 posts for a url I made, that means 2 you can
argue spam. You can't really argue spam is just one url. Now let's see how
many urls you have down below. I see 11 links on this post of yours. Does
this mean you are 5 times as bad as me?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b93aaed$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> but you spam the NG with that same link, and you also spammed me with that
> URL... I think a lot of ppl have reported you by now, so you better behave
> before even more ppl will do it...
>
> KAH
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3b92cf76$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> SEARCH
punishments
> crap
> want
you
> forwarding
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2001, 6:03pm
I was just pointing out that there are just as many, if not more (5 times
more) clickable links than what I had posted (regardless of the content
behind them or their function). Here I will make this on ZERO. Dear
mediaone, Marcus didn't put one single link in a NG post. He must be a bad
bad boy. LOL
Sep 4, 2001, 1:16am
"its the email urls the newsreader puts arent spam urls you put are"
And I even deleted all those I could and you still have a gripe with me.
Are you just here to attack me?
|