|
m a r c u s // User Search
m a r c u s // User Search
Jun 2, 2001, 3:31pm
Nope, I can prove that the account was not closed by Active Worlds. I went
to the location, and the AW account is still there alive and kicking. But
where the pic was showing is now static. Why static? cause someone ELSE
did something about it. I went to the account where the pics were stored
and their account was closed on that server, NOT INACTIVEWORLDS.
[View Quote]"nornny" <Nornny1 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b18d1c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't get it...
>
> AWCOM DID do something in removing the porn. You said they did remove it.
> After they were given notice that porn was available there, they closed
the
> account and removed the porn objects.
>
> Granted, it takes some times, but hey, it's only an army of a few against
> millions of coordinates of lands that they own. Can't get everything done
in
> haste. If you had never told them, most likely, they would've never known.
> They can't really keep track of that stuff really.
>
> Nornny
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b18c04a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Inactiveworlds
> to
I
was
> cleaning
> able
> only
nothing
> this
just
> to
>
>
|
Jun 2, 2001, 3:35pm
If only one person complained, how come it was removed by another "group" of
people. Apparently, there is a contradiction there. You can't have a group
close an account that holds porn and call them 1 person. There are people
within a group, at least that is my understanding of the definition behind
"group".
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b191074 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Harsh words and namecalling. VERY mature. Age is not a valid way to judge
people, I know 30 year olds who don't understand that the
> law exists and I know 12 year olds who can outscore 90% of the adult
population on intelligence tests, I know 30 year olds with zero
> common sense, and I know 12 year olds who have more of it than the entire
city of Baltimore.
>
> First, PKs DO NOT and CAN NOT ban accounts. AWCI does this. You were
making a whole big tizzy about everything in the newsgroups and
> in general pissing EVERYBODY off. And then there are porn objects way out
in the middle of nowhere. ONE person complains. If you
> were AWCI, would you take care of the idiot who is making everybody go
nuts or porno that one or two people have complained about?
> Get a clue, n00b. Now that I found a 3rd party patch that fixed OE's
filters to work 100% of the time, I intend to use them.
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b18f8f5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
had
lol
people
premature
And
make
remove
everything
never
view,
the
provider
and
do
rid
means
>
>
|
Jun 2, 2001, 3:38pm
I can prove that Inactiveworlds did nothing. I went to the location where
the porn was, and all I saw was static, but the account for AW was still
there alive and kicking. Why static, because some other group who housed
the porn closed that account holding the porn, not INACTIVEWORLDS. They
have done nothing about it like removing the smut from their server. I am
just happy some other organization did.
[View Quote]"nornny" <Nornny1 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b18d1c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't get it...
>
> AWCOM DID do something in removing the porn. You said they did remove it.
> After they were given notice that porn was available there, they closed
the
> account and removed the porn objects.
>
> Granted, it takes some times, but hey, it's only an army of a few against
> millions of coordinates of lands that they own. Can't get everything done
in
> haste. If you had never told them, most likely, they would've never known.
> They can't really keep track of that stuff really.
>
> Nornny
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b18c04a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Inactiveworlds
> to
I
was
> cleaning
> able
> only
nothing
> this
just
> to
>
>
|
Jun 2, 2001, 3:40pm
Well, it's nice to see one person out there knows how to read posts.
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b18d4d9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I
> found out that the account outside of Inactiveworlds holding the porn was
> completely closed. Inactiveworlds did nothing to contribute to the
cleaning
> of porn, but the people who did report it to the service provider were
able
> to influence them enough to take a look at the files referenced and not
only
> did they remove it but I repeat their account was closed.
>
> This was not done by AW.com, it was done by some outside company, they
took
> action after reviewing the files, not AW.com. So quick to defend AW.com
you
> didn't even read the post correctly, I think everyone in here is
brainwashed
> or something to believe AW is looking out for your best intrests cause
their
> not.
>
>
> "nornny" <Nornny1 at home.com> wrote in message
> news:3b18d1c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
it.
> the
against
done
> in
known.
> Inactiveworlds
and
> I
> was
not
> nothing
of
to
> just
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 9:13am
Well, welcome to inactiveworlds where "ridicule" and porn are our middle
names.
[View Quote]"budweiser" <charest at balista.com> wrote in message
news:3b19f015 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why are people so hostile here? I just like to chill but there is nothing
> but fighting here...
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 3:53pm
"I believe it's called Activeworlds."
Then they why didn't they do something about it when reported? Why did an
outside source have to come in and clean up their work?
If you have a problem with porn somewhere, contact the authorities... Seems
the specific instance you were talking about was dealt with, just not in the
way you wanted.
Yes, specifically porn, and I am not into putting strip bars around the
corner from schools either, go figure.
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a504b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I believe it's called Activeworlds. If you have a problem with porn
somewhere, contact the authorities... Seems the specific instance you were
talking about was dealt with, just not in the way you wanted.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a1be5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 5:21am
just in, nice to hear from you. I don't know if you are going to read this
and don't expect a response after this cause chances are, I won't read your
response if you choose to make one here. Nothing against you personally,
but I normally post once or twice and then move on to more current threads.
I just can't sleep now so I decided to sift through the sea of the NG abyss.
I don't know what your role in removing garbage is. You have on the url
posted, "Garbage Elimination Team". I suspect from that, you are part of a
team that eliminates garbage.
Ok, but let's read further. "We are not peacekeepers and only handle
requests for deletion concerning vandalism". That is interesting, since I
spent a whole month requesting smut to be removed, and I received no help.
Ok, I am still open let's look more and see if there are any more clues.
Ahh, "We do our best, although not affiliated with the Peacekeepers, to work
with them to make AW a happy place for everyone."
Then why may I ask are PK's the a prominent entity at the AW world, the most
populated world in Active Worlds?
The reason for this is, if certain people have to make decisions regarding
Active World's members, I can understand that. But why the red tape? Why
can't someone who is representing Active Worlds in ANY capacity take it upon
themself to go to the right source and notify them about this? I did my
part by notifying over a dozen Peacekeepers, and then after no success, I
went to the Gatekeepers. I tried to get the word out to as many people as
possible, hoping that what is solicited in the site you mentioned would
happen. It didn't, I didn't see anyone working with each other to get rid
of the porn I was reporting.
After this I decided to contact people on my contact list. I told them the
coordinates, which I first did not do hoping Active Worlds would do their
job. Then I got a response from one of my contacts on the list to notify
the server holding the porn. A group of us did that, and fairly quickly
something has been done.
Now looking back, when I read "Garbage Elimination Team", I don't see any
team of Active Worlds doing any eliminating of garbage. People who
represented Active Worlds just passed the buck around to someone else to
deal with it or they simply ignored it.
[View Quote]"just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1b1b18 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Marcus,
>
> Refer my earlier post
>
> Refer http://www.awcommunity.org/get
>
> Regards, Justin
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1a79af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
an
> Seems
> the
>
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 12:51pm
Goober, you may know the system and it might be a good system for those that
know also.
For those that don't know, it isn't good. All it would have taken is a PK
to go to someone else who did know the right source, and that is the purpose
of my position here.
Person at first stage, me, goes to PK at second stage to tell them. Either
someone in stage 2 knows someone who can have the porn removed or they go to
someone at stage 3. Then person in Stage 3 contacts the right source or
goes to the 4th stage, and so on. Eventually, you have people communicating
and working together. As someone with less information tells those more
informed, the ones that know the system eventually "GET" the information to
the right source and in this case remove the porn. This didn't work, and I
had to go outside of the system to get the job done.
Until then, you are going to have people at Stage 1 bitching and complaining
and noting "moral" injustices because no one at stage 2 is helping them.
That simple, and if you look at the statistics here on NG, I don't see
anyone posting against this who is fairly new. A lot of people against my
position that I hold have been here a while and they are the ones who know
the system but yet did nothing to help me when I did bring it up. If you
didn't know about it, why? Why didn't someone from GZ contact you, and why
weren't you around. You should be. If you are part of solution, then you
need to be there. If you come around after the fact, and tell people what
you could have done that makes you a bigger asshole than Active Worlds is by
not helping the citizens.
There, I did my bitching, and so far Active Worlds still appears to be
inactive with the exception of a "goober king" and "Just In" claiming to
have been able to do something.
Well, why didn't they. If you 2 would have done something about it, post
your frickin name at GZ so we can contact you. Geez
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1B7BFF.2E6F05EB at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Chuck, you really are a piece of work, you know that? You and marcus are
trying to
> stir up the shit when there's really nothing to stir. Marcus failed to go
to the
> *proper* source (GET) when he filed his report, plain and simple. As much
as you'd
> like to think it is, the AW community is *not* some super-network of
organizations
> that can jump on a situation at a moment's notice. All of them are
separate
> organizations, run by seperate people (regular AW citizens, no less), with
separate
> schedules and policies, and there's very little overlap. You need to go to
the right
> place *first*, otherwise nothing will get done. Granted, that's not the
most ideal of
> situations, but it's the one we have right now, so deal with it and do it
the right
> way.
>
> And marcus, did you see anywhere on that GET site the phrase "the PKs work
with us"?
> I'll bet you didn't. It's not in the PKs job description to remove
vandalism or
> garbage. That's what GET is for. If you went to GET first, I can almost
guarantee
> that you'd see that porn of yours disappear within days. I know, because
I've
> encountered such vandalism before. I contacted GET and in the span of
about three
> days or so, it was gone. So the system *does* work, you just have to know
how to use
> it.
>
> And, in the future, leave the "stirring" to the experts. ;)
>
> chucks party wrote:
it
they
Citizens
male
than
done
to
our AW
worlds
entire
attitude
like
doesn't
World
intended
are
could
themselves
So
find
was
in
AW
>
> --
> Goober King
> Raises the spoon and says "We need more salt!"
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 4, 2001, 2:19pm
Looks good, is there a "REAL" Active Worlds area there? I briefly looked
down the list, and I couldn't find it. Perhaps, and hopefully I missed it.
I would much rather use that NG from just the peek I took.
And Inactive Worlds, if you are reading, why not put categories here like
there are in the one at news.unitel.co.kr? and allow tourists, it's
pointless chatting with only people I can chat with in AW.
This would allow others outside of the program to understand the shitty
service of yours before they buy an account and milk your pockets with
money. We could also tell them of the porn you don't remove.
[View Quote]"jfk2" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:90B649A81jfk2jfkmusiccom at news.activeworlds.com...
> I love Chucks Party reply... And i'm going to let everyone see what a
REAL
> NEWSGROUPS THING LOOKS LIKE. I know that everyone in every country will
> be able to access this one & it is an example of a real community
> NEWSGROUPS Spirit.
>
> news.unitel.co.kr
>
> Everyone I know in here can access that & i have tested that entire thing
> While not as great as i would like it to be... IT IS A FREEBIE THAT
EVERYONE
> CAN ACCESS... Go through that and LEARN what a real newsgroups
> community this is like. I know from being on the net some 11 - 13 yrs
now...
>
> Ohhh.... Some of you are just going to want to ask me this
> REALLY DUMB QUESTION...
> How did i do that thing above...
>
> REALLY SMART ANSWER...
> I have this ROBOT [BOT] that searches for all the FREE PUBLIC WIDE OPEN
> NEWSGROUPS SERVERS OUT THERE and it does some basic tests and that
> is how i find these things out..... LMAO!!!!!!!
>
> http://www.slip.net/~rain/nh
>
> It is called NEWSHUNTER and it hunts down FREE Public Domain NEWSGROUPS
> that everyone can access...
>
> And after all you little WHIMPY KIDDIES SEE THE REAL NEWSGROUPS for a
change...
> You will love this CLOSED & REGULATED one alot better.
>
>
> chucks party <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in
> <3b1a1225 at server1.Activeworlds.com>:
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 2:36pm
first time poster, but you didn't just spew that info off the whims of your
noodles. Someone else told you.
You are totally missing the point of my post. Someone who DOES NOT, I
repeat, DOES NOT know about this GET system should be able to send one
single message to a PK, JUST 1 PK, and it should be dealt with.
They should have someone they know who can remove the smut. You make it
hard on the people reporting, and they won't take on the effort to do it.
If I didn't complain like I did, then it would still be there. That is the
point, not that people who know don't have a way going about it. People
that don't know, will not report since they don't know where to go to unless
they repeatedly do as I did. I don't think this should have to happen.
[View Quote]"cara" <mcm-cara at post.olivant.fo> wrote in message
news:3B1BB74D.4247CAB9 at post.olivant.fo...
> At aw gz you will find the pk pole. If you ask for a pk and none are
available,
> chances are that someone will tell you to click the pole to go to the pk
> webpage....or they will give you the pk web page adress.
> On that page is a link called *help with object removal* and it takes you
right
> to the GET page. There you wil find a link to a form to fill out with what
> objects you want removed.
> If you find a pk and complain about one or more objects you want removed,
i.e.
> vandalism or porn etc. they will (or should) direct you to the GET page.
> So next time you know where to turn for a problem like that.
>
> Oh and i'm a first time poster in this newsgroup so if i made any mistakes
bear
> with me :-)
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 2:37pm
Yes, I was and always have been one to solve problems instead of obeying
like a dog in a faulty system to please their master.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bb8ff$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Welcome to the ng Cara. Too bad more newbies don't take the time to do
there
> homework like you just did.
>
> "cara" <mcm-cara at post.olivant.fo> wrote in message
> news:3B1BB74D.4247CAB9 at post.olivant.fo...
> available,
you
> right
what
removed,
> i.e.
mistakes
> bear
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:10pm
well you just failed your own challenge. I was posting to Active Worlds,
and have always been trying to, not you idiot.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bbbfb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You still have to do your homework and learn what your talking about
before
> you can get people to listen to what you have to say.
>
> *thinks abit*
>
> Alright then I deliver this challege to all newbies. I do not believe that
> any of you (except maybe Cara who seems to have done her homework, but we
> still have to see on that point) can go a week without spewing BS for any
> topic or for any reason. I really doubt you ppl can constructively post in
> this newsgroup in a polite manner.
>
> So are you all brave enough to take the challege, or are you all just a
> bunch of babies crying for your mommies.
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bb904 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> your
it.
> the
> unless
pk
> you
> what
> removed,
page.
> mistakes
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 4:05pm
You are missing the point, that's all. Read my posts, learn.
[View Quote]"baron" <pk39srt at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bccba$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> PKs are always willing to learn and improve. We are not perfect but always
try our best to help the community in any way we can. Also note that you can
file a complaint or suggestion at peacekeeper at activeworlds.com if you feel
something is not right. Now...how about telling us, (here in public if you
wish or email at the PK email address) which PKs you contacted and they
couldn't point you to the GET page? I asked you again around the end of
April because of a similar post of yours and you didn't tell me, I find it
hard to believe a PK didn't know the garbage removal procedure. Also, I gave
you the URL to the GET page myself then so you can't claim now you didn't
know about it. It was again on a porn issue, is it the same you are talking
about now? Because if it is, please state the world this concerns. That
complaint was about non patroled, unmoderated, R rated world, where any
complaints are to be dealt by Flagg personally, I even gave you his email
address. Just to set things straight here.
>
> Baron
>
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bb904 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
your noodles. Someone else told you.
repeat, DOES NOT know about this GET system should be able to send one
single message to a PK, JUST 1 PK, and it should be dealt with.
hard on the people reporting, and they won't take on the effort to do it.
the point, not that people who know don't have a way going about it. People
that don't know, will not report since they don't know where to go to unless
they repeatedly do as I did. I don't think this should have to happen.
>
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 4:19pm
And with that logic, a lot of men can go about raping women feeling it is ok
because no one can stop them. But there are a huge group of men that don't
because they have something in them to stop that desire. I suggest you look
into this regarding porn on the net.
[View Quote]"baron" <pk39srt at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bcfde at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Actually I read your posts, took me quite a while because they were too
many, and I still can't see the point. If you think that you can free the
net from porn and all other evil, I think you are bound to fail. Kids will
have access to porn or anything else they want if they are not supervised by
their parents. No one can watch or protect your kids if you don't do it
yourself, simple as that. I asked two simple questions, how about answering
those if you are interested in improving the way things are in AW?
>
> Baron
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bcdd2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
always try our best to help the community in any way we can. Also note that
you can file a complaint or suggestion at peacekeeper at activeworlds.com if
you feel something is not right. Now...how about telling us, (here in public
if you wish or email at the PK email address) which PKs you contacted and
they couldn't point you to the GET page? I asked you again around the end of
April because of a similar post of yours and you didn't tell me, I find it
hard to believe a PK didn't know the garbage removal procedure. Also, I gave
you the URL to the GET page myself then so you can't claim now you didn't
know about it. It was again on a porn issue, is it the same you are talking
about now? Because if it is, please state the world this concerns. That
complaint was about non patroled, unmoderated, R rated world, where any
complaints are to be dealt by Flagg personally, I even gave you his email
address. Just to set things straight here.
>
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 6:01pm
Well, ok, so if you put porn in active worlds and then go to the cops and
let them know you have porn which kids can see there, they shouldn't do
anything about it?
You must be living in a area of the real world than I am not familiar with,
cause cops don't really like that sort of thing where I am at.
The servers that held the porn didn't like it either, which is why they not
only removed the files, but they closed the entire account holding the porn.
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b1be469$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Missing the point moron. Porn is NOT illegal. Rape is illegal. *slap*
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bd139$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
is ok
don't
look
too
the
will
supervised by
answering
but
that
if
public
and
end of
it
gave
didn't
talking
email
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 7:10pm
You will have to god damn a lot of people then LOL. I am not the only one
who has a "thing" against exposing porn to kids.
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bf89b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1be90d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
and
>
> Lets try it shall we? I'm sure they'll get pretty pissed at me for wasting
their time though.
>
> The internet is NOT a policed zone. If the server is not in the United
States, they are not bound to American laws and can do
> whatever the hell they want. It is YOU violating the law if you KNOWINGLY
entered this zone with illegal porn and are underaged.
> *bonk*
>
> Goddamn you and your censorship. Some of us try to escape the real world
with the Internet and you REJECTS bring realworld issues
> like policing into it. If parents don't watch their little babies who are
too immature to deal with pornography in an appropriate
> manner, it is the parent's fault if they encounter this type of content.
>
> Just wondering? How old are you? Nine? And your parents are making you
post this drivel?
with,
not
porn.
it
that
you
were
free
Kids
it
perfect
note
peacekeeper at activeworlds.com
in
contacted
the
find
Also, I
That
any
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 1:04am
Is there a point to argue with me about this? Is there a reason why we
shouldn't just have a sign at GZ "Report porn here"?
It's simple, yet you are finding every reason to not do it. URLS out of AW
is not going to work. People have to know them before they can do anything.
If you download the program and can report it there then it's better because
then everyone has a chance to help the community. Hiding it on the NET will
not help.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1C430D.4B362511 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> For someone who seems intent on pointing out when other people "miss the
point", you
> certainly seem to do a good job of it yourself.
>
> First off, I don't know where you got the impression that either myself or
Just In
> can "do something about it". We're both just Average Joe Citizens, just
like you, and
> we have to jump through the same hoops you do when dealing with vandalism.
>
> Secondly, did you miss that whole paragraph where I stated "the AW
community is *not*
> some super-network of organizations that can jump on a situation at a
moment's
> notice."? The *only* place I know of that has a link to GET is the
Peacekeepers'
> homepage. Would it be nice if this link was posted all over AW? Yes, but
> unfortunately, it isn't. As I stated in my previous post, (which you
apparently
> missed) Every single organization (including those who are a part of
AWCommunity.org)
> are all run by completely separate people, and getting them to all work
together in a
> cohesive unit is harder than getting Roland to implement ideas from the
Wishlist NG!
> Hell, It's almost surprising that one organization would even know how
another one
> operates! AWCom has absolutely *nothing* to do with how the community is
run, apart
> from assisting PKs do their job.
>
> Thirdly, t'would seem that Baron actually *gave* you all the proper
information, yet
> somehow you refused to answer his well-meaning questions. Why would that
be? Afraid
> of admitting that you actually *did* have the information and didn't know
to use it?
> Or do you still want to keep up this charade of "They didn't do what I
wanted!!!"?
> Please, if the PKs wronged you so, then it should be a simple matter to
disprove
> Baron and expose him for the "inactive, incompetent PK" that you seem to
think
> everyone else is. Let the truth be known!
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
that
PK
purpose
Either
go to
communicating
to
and I
complaining
my
know
you
why
you
what
is by
post
are
go
much
with
go to
the
it
work
almost
because
know
here
where
it
must
was
have
trying
have
owned
the
it's
looks
New
they
one
"pornographic
lolol
were
porn
find a
only my
nothing
objects
no
ignoreing
see in
lol
>
> --
> Goober King
> He'd almost swear Marcus was being trained by Chuck...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 5, 2001, 1:07am
That assumes PEOPLE KNOW WHERE TO REPORT IT!!!!!!
GOD, can't you realize not everyone is going to know the sites you know.
They need some way to contact AW about this without needing to find someone
nice enough to give them the FUCKING URL.
I spent a whole month contacting people, and no one told me.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1C44B8.745094FE at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> I guess that explains why you don't talk to yourself much...
>
> Just like Marcus, apparently you missed that entire paragraph where I said
"the AW
> community is *not* some super-network of organizations that can jump on a
situation
> at a moment's notice." Most people don't post a link to GET because they
assume it's
> a part of the PKs and simply post a link to the PKs site, assuming you'll
find GET
> through them. And, as Marcus and yourself have glaringly demonstrated,
that's
> apparently an erroneous assumption. Maybe instead of whining to us,
regular citizens
> who can't do squat about your beef, you should be complaining to those
people who you
> think wronged you. Tell GET to start advertising more. Tell the PKs to
make it
> mandatory to learn the ins and outs of every single org in AW. But don't
come crying
> to us and expect our condolences, because that's not what this is. This is
a
> newsgroup, not a support group.
>
> Oh, and budweiser, if you're even still following this thread, THIS is why
there's so
> much hate in here...
>
> chucks party wrote:
on
to
>
> --
> Goober King
> "Do I talk to myself?" "Yes... Yes I do..."
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 5, 2001, 1:44am
Avoiding Baron? I don't see any posts by him directed to me, and I went to
AW ground zero, I saw no sign to remove porn. I press catch up here which
makes everything read so I can just read the new posts when I check back.
Paste it here and I will respond to whatever you want me to look at.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1C5232.AAE0625 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Guess what, jefe. They *do* have a "report [vandalism] here" sign at GZ...
it's
> called the GET Trash Can. You click it, and it'll take you immediately to
the GET
> website where you can submit your vandalism report. Then it'll get taken
care off. If
> you missed that, it's not AW's fault, so stop trying to make it sound like
it is.
>
> And you're *still* avoiding Baron... why?
>
> m a r c u s wrote:
AW
anything.
because
will
>
> --
> Goober King
> Common sense appears to be a becoming a collector's item...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 3, 2001, 3:57pm
Bring on Inactiveworlds 4!!!, whoohoo!!!!
Free streaming porn in this one for all your kiddies, LMAO
[View Quote]"budweiser" <charest at balista.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a5bbf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> does anyone know if the gurus in aw plan on expanding alpha world?
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 2:21pm
And who pays for him to be in Jail? Think about it, NOT a good idea.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1baf25$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hey that lawyer must have been on crack cause if you can't pay you goto
> jail. Its that simple.
>
> "jfk2" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
> news:90B6717E6jfk2jfkmusiccom at news.activeworlds.com...
can
is
> <3b1ba9fa$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>:
ass
> imbecile.
> for
> they
> CR*P
> likewise...
> have
> Income.
> creditors
DOUBLE
> thing
And
> if
> Just
OneSummer
place...
TOO...
little
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 2:54pm
"Rule 2: Adhere to the same standards of behavior online that you follow in
real life"
PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM SMUT 101
1. In "real life", if person A puts a porn magazine in a park opened with a
nude picture near a tree not in obvious view from the entrance of a park,
and person B comes to the park, sees the magazine and reports it to person C
who is representing the park, but person C does nothing about, is this ok?
Or is it wrong? What should person C do? (get your scan tron sheet out and
number 2 font color)
a)report it to someone higher up who can remove it
b)remove it if they are allowed to by the park
c)pass the buck, have person B do the work alone to find someone higher up
referred to in number 1 choice
d)post statements in a NG about how someone is trying to clean up smut from
the park, but do nothing else to help remove the porn. Then, when smut is
removed, tell everyone what could have been done after person B did all the
work.
e)ask which tree it is, and go check it out
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bb878 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Since you newbies don't know a thing about how to act online here is a
guide
> that will show you what is considered bad form.
>
> http://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html
>
> And yes the link does work.
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:09pm
removing porn from kid's reach is not old
I have not received any notice from Inactiveworlds, nor do I expect to, that
they have realized they need to improve the way porn found on their server
is dealt with so people like me do not have to go out of their system to do
their work.
I would love to return to the environment I started off in, but with the
conditions changed in respect to removing porn because right now there is no
assurance the same thing won't happen again. And maybe the next server will
allow the smut to stay. If both the server and active worlds allows it,
then there is no way it will be removed.
I got lucky, the server holding porn was intelligent enough to not only
remove the porn, but they closed the whole account which was filled with
additional porn.
Active Worlds would have found the same thing if they had stepped up to the
plate and done their homework.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bbe73$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> marcus this isn't for the porn stuff this is for those newbies that don't
> even know the rules. So please don't bring that now dead topic into this
> particular thread.
>
> Be happy that the porn is gone. And leave the rest be.
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bbd48$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> in
with
> a
park,
person
> C
ok?
and
up
> from
is
> the
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:14pm
correction "on their server" should be changed to "through their server" for
better clarification. The porn was found through their server, it was not
stored on their server.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bc0c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> removing porn from kid's reach is not old
>
> I have not received any notice from Inactiveworlds, nor do I expect to,
that
> they have realized they need to improve the way porn found on their server
> is dealt with so people like me do not have to go out of their system to
do
> their work.
>
> I would love to return to the environment I started off in, but with the
> conditions changed in respect to removing porn because right now there is
no
> assurance the same thing won't happen again. And maybe the next server
will
> allow the smut to stay. If both the server and active worlds allows it,
> then there is no way it will be removed.
>
> I got lucky, the server holding porn was intelligent enough to not only
> remove the porn, but they closed the whole account which was filled with
> additional porn.
>
> Active Worlds would have found the same thing if they had stepped up to
the
> plate and done their homework.
>
>
>
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1bbe73$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
don't
follow
> with
> park,
> person
> ok?
> and
higher
> up
smut
> is
all
a
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:38pm
Stop questioning me on that. I don't think forcing someone to go to a right
source is the right way to do this. I was in a state of not knowing.
People were more knowledgeable than me about this. If they had told the
person or person who could remove it, then it would have been better.
Apparently, they chose to do nothing, or they didn't know themself.
So, what is wrong with telling a PK. PK tells Get, or they tell someone who
knows to contact GET.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bc453$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Your right it is important to keep smut from kids.
>
> But did you send the requests to the correct places?
>
> did you email:
>
> cof at activeworlds.com
> or
> support at activeworlds.com
>
> You could always have called them at
>
> (978) 499-0222
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bc0c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that
server
> do
is
> no
> will
> the
> don't
this
> follow
this
out
> higher
smut
> smut
> all
is
> a
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:40pm
Chris, for a month I asked about the smut and no one told be about GET until
now.
I don't think forcing someone to contact the right source is the right way
to do this.
Please listen, if I report to PK, then PK reports to GET, then people who
are in the state of not knowing still have a way to get the porn removed.
Forcing someone to find the right source means it will take longer for the
porn to be removed since in my case at least no one told me about GET til
now.
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bc74c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Actually you should contact GET. AWCI cannot really do anything to remove
> it because hte problem is so large! Peacekeeper.net hosts the GET
submition
> form, although they are two different entities. Just go to
> www.peacekeeper.net and click on the link "Help with Object Removal" to
get
> to the form.
>
> Within a few days to week, a representative of GET will contact you via
> telegram on whether or not they were allowed to remove the objects. With
> porn, it's a sure bet they will.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1bc453$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to,
> server
to
the
> is
server
it,
only
with
to
> this
opened
a
to
> this
> out
> smut
did
here
> is
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:54pm
All I have to say is get off your high horse and look into what I am saying.
I have sent you bozos many emails at support at activeworlds.com
Am I lying? ask Fletch. How do I know fletch? well gee I wonder...
You of all people are illustrating exactly how much Active Worlds chooses to
ignore the individual like me who is trying to get rid of porn for a good
cause so kids are not exposed to it.
Every attempt of mine is dealt with by another person. I can't get one
person to sit down and work this out with me. Each person reads a glimpse
of my posts and assumes I didn't bring up something they are about to
propose. I did email, I did contact people, and I tried. Active Worlds did
nothing. One email to the server holding the porn, and they did something.
For your sake, listen to what I have to say, because the next server might
allow the porn. If you do nothing about it, I will help find someone who
will put Active Worlds in their place.
Porn should not be easily accessible to children.
If it's not a law yet, call it the Marcus act of 2001
[View Quote]"facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message
news:3b1bc926$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1bc453$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> Or abuse at activeworlds.com ?
>
> I know for a fact that support at activeworlds.com never received *anything*
on
> this matter - also, out of 86 million objectsin a hugely public world, do
> you know how hard it is to check every one of them for things like that?
> Also, we are in the same position as any other ISP, if you read in your
user
> agreement you will note
>
> "AWCOM exercises no screening, editorial, or other control over Content
> available to you through your use of the Software and AW Software, and
> Content may include material that could be deemed distasteful, misleading,
> inaccurate, offensive, pornographic or otherwise objectionable.
Furthermore,
> use of the Software or AW Software does not guarantee any privacy or
> confidentiality of any Content you post or make available through the
> Software and AWCOM assumes no responsibility or liability for the
> preservation of such Content and may modify or remove it at AWCOM's sole
> discretion. You hereby release AWCOM from any and all liability for all
> claims related to Content as well as claims related to the security or
level
> of privacy provided."
>
> We will do whatever we can to remove such, but we are under absolutly no
> liablity in regards to content as agreed to in your user agreement when
> signing up to use our softeware, and there is no guarantee that you will
not
> be confronted with such material in our software.
>
> If there are complaints on the matter,s end them to abuse at activeworlds.com
> or support at activeworlds.com and they will be looked into - but if we do
not
> receive the emails, then please do not complain about inaction, as we have
> no way of doing anything if we dont even get your complaints.
>
> No further correspondance on this issue will be entered into beyond this
> post, if you have other concerns, please email us directly.
>
> Fletch
> AW Support.
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 3:58pm
How about spending more time in Active Worlds helping people? Maybe post
the FAQ's there.
Maybe put something that says "PORN if found will be removed, contact here"
in the Active Worlds area.
Do something
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bcaa9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hey Nornny do you still have the ng FAQs? If so why not try posting them
> again.
>
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1bb878 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> guide
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 4:16pm
Why don't we get a baton and run from city to city painting it with all the
red tape that is being spewed here.
How many contacts does it need to get rid of porn? Why not have people go
in, see the porn and remove it.
There is a lot of effort here to not do the job, but get around it by
offering emails.
I did email, and nothing happened until I emailed the server holding the
porn.
And for allowing the porn to stay in active worlds, I say to Active Worlds,
FUCK YOU!!!
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bcea2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> marcus I wasn't critizing you I was trying to help by pointing out
> information you may have missed.
>
> Even I forgot to add in abuse at activeworlds.com and Factor was good enough
to
> remind us about that one.
>
> It also reminded me a general given about ISPs if you see something like
> spam smut or what ever that is offensive try sending an email to
> abuse at ISPname and you'll usually get some response.
>
> Though how I could forget that when I had to program a macro to
> automatically send the 2000 daily spams I get to the abuse department of
the
> domain they come from, is a surprise to me.
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bcc3a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
post
> here"
them
a
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 4:32pm
"marcus the porn is gone, you don't have to make this into an obsession. "
Porn is not gone. Just because I have helped remove 4 pictures in 2
incidents doesn't mean a server which allows porn on their server won't
eventually be linked through Active Worlds. This vulnerability should be
addressed, not the porn itself.
"Not everyone wants to hear about porn this and porn that all the time."
Then I suggest they ignore the posts regarding that which they don't want to
read. I am being forced to do the same with porn.
"And don't forget porn is only on the internet because it makes lots of
money. But banning it won't make it go away it will only cause it to hide
more and become more appealing to the mushrooms that get hooked by it."
Never said they should ban it. Keep it away from the kiddies. It is not
hard to pull up on a daily or weekly basis, what .jpg's are referenced in a
world. I am not talking about all, I am talking about the latest ones. If
they are porn, you remove them and notify the person posting the url. You
also notify the server holding the porn in case they don't want it on their
server.
Little ole me did it, and it worked. Give it a try, you can help too.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bd267$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> marcus the porn is gone, you don't have to make this into an obsession.
Not
> everyone wants to hear about porn this and porn that all the time.
>
> And don't forget porn is only on the internet because it makes lots of
> money. But banning it won't make it go away it will only cause it to hide
> more and become more appealing to the mushrooms that get hooked by it.
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bd095$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
go
> Worlds,
> enough
like
of
contact
posting
here
> is
>
>
|
|