|
bowen // User Search
bowen // User Search
Dec 20, 2002, 4:04am
There all opinions. That's what makes vigilantes work. o_O
--Bowen--
Dec 21, 2002, 3:23pm
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:Xns92EBB57BC5438kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in
> news:Xns92EBB5082CFDAkahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201:
>
>
> Let me correct myself there... Your posts with *1* line of contents (lets
> justify another 10-20 of additional lines for headers) are on over 300
> lines...
|
Wimp, I downloaded it all with AOL dialup on barely above 14.4 kbps.
--Bowen--
Dec 21, 2002, 9:58pm
[View Quote]"agent1" <agent1 at shatteredplatters.com.nospam> wrote in message
news:3e04f737$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why should everyone else have to download it? There isn't any reason to post in
HTML other than to be difficult.
|
Yes, if I want to view HTML I'll open mozilla.
--Bowen--
Dec 24, 2002, 12:07am
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e0773ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Christmas Day is Wednesday, but the celebration starts Tuesday evening (24th
> December).
|
Uh ok.
--Bowen--
Dec 28, 2002, 6:29pm
[View Quote]"truetome2" <TrueToMe2 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3e0df13a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hehe no "She" here KAH, and thanks for the observation of posting in the
> wrong NG....Duh if I was still part of beta I could have posted to the right
> one....
> Hugzzz Lioness it's okay dear, I'm still me hehehe
|
Goober King called you a she, not KAH.
--Bowen--
Dec 28, 2002, 11:55pm
[View Quote]"truetome2" <TrueToMe2 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3e0e4b6b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Awww so your right there Bowen, I am sorry KAH, I was not quite awake this
> morning. My Apologies KAH
> True
|
Happens to the best of us. :P
I think KAH's too busy with his freeciv hacking to care anyways.
--Bowen--
Jan 4, 2003, 4:10pm
[View Quote]"ryan jacob" <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e171f46 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ahh, a long techie answer. Someone, PLEASE summarize this! LOL
|
People take English words and use them to write sentences, but foreigners don't
always get them grammatically correct.
--Bowe--
Jan 4, 2003, 6:55pm
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3e1744ba at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Interesting summary. I think actually though that a more accurate one would have
been something like: What's grammatically incorrect to some people may be
grammatically correct to others. :)
|
Grammar is based on the general assumption of what's right by the majority of those
that use the language natively? Just because all the Chinese people learn English
and decide "the" should be changed to "oleyumption" doesn't make it right. :O
--Bowen--
Jan 5, 2003, 4:28pm
> We tend to correct children when they say things in a way that makes sense rather
than the way they're "supposed to" say it, but I often wonder if we should pay more
attention and learn from them as much as we teach them. For example, the verb forms
"gooder" and "goodest" are logical enough even though we're used to something else,
they would be easier for people learning English as a second language, and I don't
see how a native English speaker could fail to recognize their meaning let alone
think they meant something else unless they had learned a dialect of English that's
WAY different from any I've ever heard of. What makes such words "wrong" anyway?
The words we use now and think of as correct were all wrong "everywhere" at some
point in time.
What makes it "wrong" is just how people feel. Believe it or not, it's usually how
it sounds in a sentence that determines it to be wrong. "It's gooder than cheese."
just doesn't sound good, maybe it's growing up with the language and knowing it's not
right but I just don't think it sounds good at all.
--Bowen--
Jan 5, 2003, 11:32pm
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3e18b4bc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol, how long ago was this posted? It sounds ancient, and not to mention,
> only vaguely related to AW :-)
|
I saw DLP... if I remember correctly KAH said there was some uber-flame war with DLP
with JFK2 and chucksparty? This predates me though so I can't give you info.
--Bowen--
Jan 9, 2003, 7:05pm
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3E1DE055.9EECFD30 at oct31.de...
> Broadband (mostly ADSL, some power line or cable, very few Sat DSL)
> coverage in germany is about 27% I think. Some cannot get it because
> of the region, some prefer cheaper ISDN flat rates.
|
Only about 20-30% of people in the Central New York area have broadband.
--Bowen--
Jan 9, 2003, 2:08am
[View Quote]"yanst" <ayansta at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e1cf4eb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Is there any possibility for AWGate to be Iceland or Greenland, anything
> other than China?
|
It's not just China. Do you have some unfledged discrimination of China in your
system or something?
My I also ask what is so breathtaking of Iceland and Greenland? Such as well known
structures or landmarks that could be included in the Gate.
--Bowen--
Jan 9, 2003, 1:48pm
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e1d20db at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ice.
|
That's in my minifridge. Let's put that in AWGate, my minifridge.
--Bowen--
Jan 9, 2003, 1:51pm
[View Quote]"anarkissed" <anarkissed at nospam.alt.2600.net> wrote in message
news:3e1d7f84 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> China? What's chinese about it?
> The wall around it? Its just a wall with turrets. A rather nice one in
> fact. Just because there's a large stone wall with turrets and a road on it
> doesn't make it chinese!
> It's fantasy, that's all. Just a 3d sculpture you can walk around in and a
> rather nicely built one at that!
> Methinks mayhaps you should go back to school and learn a bit more about the
> world before you go about making yourself look so incredibly narrow minded,
> uninformed, judgemental and downright foolish.
|
It is modeled after the Great Wall of China. If you look around the world, there are
a couple of landmarks from other places in the world, like Hollywood, just redone a
little. Enzo said the globe above the center of GZ is modeled after the Epcot
center. I think we already had this conversation though.
--Bowen--
Freaking déjà vu.
Jan 11, 2003, 5:02pm
[View Quote]"ryan jacob" <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e206285$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> All I see is a clock...
|
The death popup. Alt+F4 kills popups and popunders if they're the foremost.
--Bowen--
Jan 11, 2003, 5:24pm
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3E206DBC.9080802 at utn.cjb.net...
> All I see is a blank page and no pop-up... Oh, that's right! I use
> Netscape, so I don't fall victim to such lame tricks! :)
>
> Hooray for pop-up blocking! :D
|
Wussy!
--Bowen--
Jan 11, 2003, 5:33pm
[View Quote]"ryan jacob" <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e206f72 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmm I don't see any death popup..just a clock (I have ZoneAlarm Pro which
> automatically blocks popups and popunders and ads..could this be the
> reason?)
|
Yup. It is a funny popup though.
--Bowen--
Jan 11, 2003, 10:45pm
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3E20A25B.9010408 at utn.cjb.net...
> I think you mean "Opera", jstone. Oprah would just talk the popups to
> death. :P
>
> And, as I mentioned before, Netscape blocks popups as well. Not only
> that, it's actually smart enough to still allow popups that you
> specifically activate (i.e. by clicking a link that pops up a new
> window) and you can choose websites that are exempt from popups, or only
> block popups from certain sites.
|
LoL Oprah could've also eaten them, or bring Dr. Phil to consult it's marriage
problems. Mozilla forever.
--Bowen--
Jan 19, 2003, 2:36pm
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3e2aa70f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When MPEG people make MP5's every single time we type something like "Hey,
> Any idea where I can get MP5's?" The US government is going to be bombing
> our houses thinking were part of the arms trade.... Egh..
|
Uh no. It doesn't work like that.
--Bowen--
Jan 19, 2003, 3:27pm
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3e2adb16 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You mean they are going to bomb us *BEFORE* we say MP5's? *Runs for the bomb
> shelter*
|
No, they just mark you as "possible threats" MP5's aren't the greatest sub-machine
guns in the world. A real terrorist uses box-cutters since they're so 1337.
--Bowen--
Jan 19, 2003, 9:55pm
[View Quote]"sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3e2b24b4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Needs to study up on the laugh factor hierarchy you.
|
"Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Fat Ass Off!!!" ? :P
--Bowen--
[View Quote]> "ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
> news:3e2b1f30 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
Jan 17, 2003, 9:45pm
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e288ee6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Don't call a MAJJORITY "minority"!
> AW does NOT revolve around the usa.
|
Well I would definately say US is # 1 on the population majority of AW.
--Bowen--
Jan 17, 2003, 11:52pm
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e28b263$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> DONT DISS THE AUSTRALIANS, ITALIANS AND EVERYONE ELS!
> BACK OFF WITH YOUR MINORITY COUNTRY, NO ONE EVEN CARES AT ALL ABOUT IT
|
Amazing how you threw Italians in there. The point of events is to get the maximum
turn-outs, honestly, that's best done by picking a time inbetween US and UK as it
would yield the most people. As you argued earlier the timezones between the UK and
the rest of Europe isn't very much. So I would say EST+2 would be a great time for
maximum turnout events.
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 12:05am
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e28b434$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> why not est+3 then? as in vrt, its exactly in the middle
|
Sure, but the US is larger than just the East coast... I was trying to include them
as well. It's relatively hard for people on the West coast to attend VRT oriented
events sometimes. As you can imagine, that's quite a time difference.
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 12:13am
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e28b734 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> He is talking about the west coast......dude, don't forget Russia, China,
> Australia, Japan, Brunei, Papua New Guinea, Korea etc.
|
The population from those areas is relatively low in comparison to the US and Europe.
Australia might be equal to the total from all of those countries. And those that
want to attend the events will be even smaller than the total popluation. Therefore
it'd be stupid to try and make it accessable to that extreme when your aiming for the
_MAXIMUM_ turnout possible. I would estimate, as ihnk said, that US and Europe makes
at least 80% of AW's VR population.
2 am EST is better for the West coast than the East coast. I'm guessing 2 am EST
events is aimed towards Australia. Since they don't want the maximum turnout
possible, it's not at a better time.
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 12:42am
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e28bc03 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You are dumb to believe the world was made for english speaking ppl, UK is
> NOT europe, UK is just a little tiny part of it, so stuff it.
|
I think UK and Germany make up majority of European population on AW.
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 12:57am
[View Quote]"ihnk" <awihnk5 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3e28bf29$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ok my IQ is dropping just listening to your babble. First off i did not say
> the world was made for english speaking people. i said AWEC world was. i was
> there and all the words were in english.... and why are u so defensive? and
> IMHO the world SHOULD have one common language. not english tho its too
> confusing and has too many words... but thats not the point.
|
Regardless of it's many words it's one of the easiest languages to learn. That
should be true since 25% + of the world speaks it (approx). That's a lot of
people...
I see nothing wrong with English being the universal language. As long as it's not
Ebonics...
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 1:06am
[View Quote]"ihnk" <awihnk5 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3e28c40d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> english is one of the most complex languages in the world. Spanish is easy.
> english seems easy since you know it, however when you have to learn it its
> tough. Oh and it is so widely used because UK laid claim to most of the
> world. and now its because america is so powerful and thus influences alot
> of countries (like with buisnesses and such, like they did to hawaii)
|
Most people learn English just because too. It's not really that hard if we were to
compare it to most oriental languages. I'd say English is about a half way point.
Oriental - English | Germanic languages - Latin derivatives
That seems like a nice representation.
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 1:27am
[View Quote]"ihnk" <awihnk5 at yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3e28c718 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i want to learn german, beautiful language. but dont comapre english to
> oriental languages. those are as old as latin and hiroglyphs at egypt....
> for some reason they just didnt feel the need to upgrade their language....
> well i dont know there is simplified chinese.... wait a minute what were we
> talking about?
|
I don't remember anymore. Eep not having a job?
--Bowen--
Jan 18, 2003, 2:34am
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3E28D180.7070305 at utn.cjb.net...
> Not quite. Like IHNK pointed out, the only reason English seems so easy
> to learn is because you grew up with it. In fact, English is *the*
> hardest language to learn simply because it's a mish-mash of Latin and
> Germanic languages, among others. Next on the list would be the Oriental
> languages, but those are definitely a distant second in terms of
> structural complexity.
|
It was a rough classification. People like challenges.
--Bowen--
|