|
chucks party // User Search
chucks party // User Search
Jun 4, 2001, 1:42pm
You know it's SNERTS like you that change the subject and start flameing
people that are the problem, not JFK. You haven't said 1 intelligent thing
since I saw you rear your ugly head here, why don't you just crawl back to
the pit you oozed out of.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1ba98a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Still until you Juno idiots showed up we had 60% fewer flamewars than at
> present. Sure we have a few battles over some subjects but we all had
> respect for the people we were debating with. And that was because they
> earned that respect with intelligent posts that while not always nice
still
> gave the answer we needed.
>
> But you Juno twits don't even follow the ng guidlines let alone have
> anything intelligent to say. So why not crawl back to the slime pit you
> oozed out of and let us get back to intelligent and more mature
> conversations.
>
> Just cause your an 11 yr old who finally learned how to turn his computer
> on. Doesn't mean you know jack about whats going on.
>
>
> "jfk2" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
> news:90B66B47Cjfk2jfkmusiccom at news.activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 8:45am
The SNERTS run it wiz didn't you know that? LOL
[View Quote]"wizard myrddin" <avrquest at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:3b19f0d5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> In a email from aw I recived they state that:
>
> "The newsgroups are not run or edited by Activeworlds. "
>
> and can not tell me who runs it, despite the domain it is hosted on
> registered to:
> Registrant:
> Activeworlds, Inc. (ACTIVEWORLDS2-DOM)
> 95 Parker St
> Newburyport, MA 01950
> US
> Perhaps I asume the person in aw who give me the information did not know
> about the newsgroups.
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 8:32am
LMAO! Do you really need to ask this question to understand why? It's called
SNERTS. Young people that have no clue what they are talking about because
they don't have any of life's expieriences under their belt and think they
know it all. I know I remember when I use to be that way and I drove my
parents and most every adult around me absolutely nuts cause I didn't have a
freaking clue about what I was talking about. So there isn't so much hate
here as there is just a bunch of SNERTS that haven't got anything better to
do than make everything everyone says into a flame war or constantly telling
people how to do whatever it is they are doing or correcting gramatical
errors, LOL The list goes on and on and on and usually takes the original
threads problem totally off track and into something that wasn't intended,
they are very very good at doing that constantly, lol Then you have to
defend yourself against their idiodic moronic attacks along with trying to
get some kind of intelligent conversation out of all of it, LOL Which they
can't handle because they are SNERTS and treat everyone like their SNERT
classmates at school, lol Now you see why teachers are failing miserably in
schools because they have no power to disciplin anymore and the kids can't
keep anything focused, they enjoy running off at the mouth like they know
everything and end up learning nothing. Hope this explains it for you. :)
[View Quote]"budweiser" <charest at balista.com> wrote in message
news:3b19f015 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why are people so hostile here? I just like to chill but there is nothing
> but fighting here...
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 9:39pm
1 SNERT down too many more to go, lol
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a5005$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Since you're no longer in my NG Survivor tribe, I have no need to
communicate with you ever again. You're filtered. Almost all of your posts
say the same thing, and I'm tired of it.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a1225 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
called
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 9:40pm
Well you're not me so just speak for yourself :)
[View Quote]"mike zimmer" <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
news:3b1a5841$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chuck I wouldn't be talking.......
> chucks party <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1a1225 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> called
because
they
have
> a
hate
> to
> telling
original
intended,
to
they
> in
can't
know
:)
> nothing
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 9:42pm
DUH really now you think that might be the freaking problem to begin with?
Perfect SNERT reply defending the actions of AW.com which happen to be no
action at all LOL
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a504b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I believe it's called Activeworlds. If you have a problem with porn
somewhere, contact the authorities... Seems the specific instance you were
talking about was dealt with, just not in the way you wanted.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a1be5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 9:44pm
Hopelessly SNERTified, lol
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a823c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1a79af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
an
>
> It wasn't Activeworlds' work, it was that of the person who put up the
signs or whatever. Since the webhost took down the account, *all* of the
signs pointing to content from it now show nothing.
>
>
> -Agent1
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 11:57pm
wing attracts the most pleasant of people don't he, lolol
[View Quote]"ladybunny" <LadyBunny at triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3B1ACAA6.B38E4E27 at triad.rr.com...
> I know as a female exactly what you mean by getting request like that in
whispers , what I can't figure out is how they expect to do
> that? and with a complete stranger?? :)
>
>
> wing wrote:
>
citnums (
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 7:38am
I don't know how this got started in this thread to begin with but here it
goes, lol Marcus consider the source ok, lol JI only likes porn where they
haven't reached the age to even grow pubic hair ok, lol I have said it
before and I will say it again, AW.com does not care about keeping Citizens
safe from anything unless it suits them and by the sound of it they must
have enjoyed what they saw or they would have had it removed. If it was male
porn with guys screwing each other and in sexual positions they more than
likely would have had it removed alot quicker and probably would have done
something about it. My guess is you were talking to straight men trying to
get them to remove nude women in sexual positions, once again we have our AW
double standard for what they deem fit for people to view in AW owned worlds
and obviously it was not a priority to them like they try to lead the entire
community to believe. If they enjoy it why destroy it, that's their attitude
about it. Alpha World even has it's own set of nude female pics in it's
texture library, people can say oh that's not porn, well it sure looks like
the women are spread and ready to do something in those pics and it doesn't
look like they are taking a nap ok, lol And I quote from Webster's New World
dictionary the deffinition of pornography: writings, pictures ect. intended
primarily to arouse sexual desire. Now if you follow that to a T the
pictures would not even necessarily need to be completely nude but they are
and for a young adult straight male or lesbian female those pictures could
be considered pornographic. So what makes 1 picture pornographic and one
not? If I remember correctly before I ever saw my first "pornographic
magazine" I found anything nude or some positions that people put themselves
in fully clothed to arouse sexual desire and things went SHWING! lolol So
obviously the pictures you tried to get removed made the people you were
reporting it to go SHWING! too LOL So next time if there is female porn find
a straight female and you might have better results and male porn find a
straight male and you might have better results as well. This is only my
opinion but what else am I suppose to believe when absolutely nothing was
done about something that was clearly pornographic and on pict objects in
full view to anyone that may have come across them with absolutely no
warning to the viewer. AW.com get your sh*t together and stop ignoreing
obvious breeches in AW's rules when they are reported to you. Family
oriented my a$$, you could give 2 sh*ts about what young children see in AW
owned worlds. That's all I have to say on the subject, NEXT CASE! lol
Jun 4, 2001, 1:27pm
ok so if this GET thing is for real then why don't they have any links on
AW.com's pages to get there like the PKs do? How are you suppose to know
where the hell to go if the freaking links aren't there, I hate talking to
morons, ugh
Jun 4, 2001, 1:33pm
That was so funny I forgot to laugh.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1ba5ae at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Isn't it funny that the only SNERT in the entire ng is you?
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 1:38pm
yes and you need to find the off switch, lol
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1baa8d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yeah how smart do you have to be to turn on a computer and click and icon?
> Not very since your able to do it.
>
> "jfk2" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
> news:90B672E98jfk2jfkmusiccom at news.activeworlds.com...
on
know
> to
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 1:54pm
I don't know who you are or who you think you are, and personally could
careless. The only one BSing and spouting off at people is you. That's all
I've seen from you, every freaking post. Marcus has had a legitimate gripe
about the porn situation on AW owned worlds and all he's gotten is ridiculed
for trying to report it to no avail by anyone in the AW community. All you
want to do is tell everyone they are wrong, that does not help the situation
and you are the biggest BSer I have seen hit the NGs since wing, lol having
fun yet, I am, comon talk some more shit so I can put your dick in it,
understand that better ass wipe :)
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bab0a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yah you forgot to laugh because you know its true, that your a lonely,
four
> eyed twit who couldn't handle talking to people f2f because they'd beat
the
> shit out of you for all the BS you spout day in and day out.
>
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1baa2c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 5:41pm
Finally someone with a clear cut answer to a straight forward question.
Thankyou Cara :)
[View Quote]"cara" <mcm-cara at post.olivant.fo> wrote in message
news:3B1BB74D.4247CAB9 at post.olivant.fo...
> At aw gz you will find the pk pole. If you ask for a pk and none are
available,
> chances are that someone will tell you to click the pole to go to the pk
> webpage....or they will give you the pk web page adress.
> On that page is a link called *help with object removal* and it takes you
right
> to the GET page. There you wil find a link to a form to fill out with what
> objects you want removed.
> If you find a pk and complain about one or more objects you want removed,
i.e.
> vandalism or porn etc. they will (or should) direct you to the GET page.
> So next time you know where to turn for a problem like that.
>
> Oh and i'm a first time poster in this newsgroup so if i made any mistakes
bear
> with me :-)
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 5:44pm
Yeah seems the PKs don't even know to give you the advice to use GET's
services, how were you to know unless they told you it was handled by them.
Vandalism and porn are 2 horses of a different color. 1 has nothing to do
with the other.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bb904 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> first time poster, but you didn't just spew that info off the whims of
your
> noodles. Someone else told you.
>
> You are totally missing the point of my post. Someone who DOES NOT, I
> repeat, DOES NOT know about this GET system should be able to send one
> single message to a PK, JUST 1 PK, and it should be dealt with.
>
> They should have someone they know who can remove the smut. You make it
> hard on the people reporting, and they won't take on the effort to do it.
>
> If I didn't complain like I did, then it would still be there. That is
the
> point, not that people who know don't have a way going about it. People
> that don't know, will not report since they don't know where to go to
unless
> they repeatedly do as I did. I don't think this should have to happen.
>
>
> "cara" <mcm-cara at post.olivant.fo> wrote in message
> news:3B1BB74D.4247CAB9 at post.olivant.fo...
> available,
you
> right
what
removed,
> i.e.
mistakes
> bear
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 5:56pm
A: I have done that as well B:Your virginity has nothing to do with your
brain and growing up. C: You are filtered as of today you low life piece of
trash.
[View Quote]"jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bb1e4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Since wing? Pardon but I have been here for over a year. I know more about
> AW and its netiquette than you. As any of the old timers and they will
tell
> you about my rep as the crusader for the underdog.
>
> Only I use facts and documented proof not BS speculations and ramblings no
> one wants to hear. When some one wants to know a piece of the law. I post
> the ENTIRE friggin laws in context with links so they can see for
> themselves.
>
> So shut the fuck up and go find a girlfriend so you can finally use your
> virginity and grow up.
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1baf4a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
all
gripe
> ridiculed
you
> situation
> having
beat
>
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 9:36pm
Well said syli, it's too bad they don't have the enthusiasm you do about
their world, doesn't even sound like they even stop in to see how you all
are doing or even a simple thankyou or explaination. Happy trails to you,
wherever it may go :)
Jun 3, 2001, 11:54pm
Yes only 1 facet of the many other problems I've heard, very unfortunate and
careless.
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:3b1ae88c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> thats right chuck thats why some of had to take our worlds back and
change
> OP lost years of work and memories :-(
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1aca0a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
all
you,
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 6:10pm
More of the same Marcus, LOL blah blah blah and no action unless it suits
them. They sure acted when I put signs on a cit owned world to get me banned
for 9 days, responded to that 1 persons complaint, but they can't do the
same if someone puts porn on their own worlds, wonder what would happen if
they put that energy into actually making AW a safer and better place, gee
what a freaking concept instead they like chasing after me with a PK to get
me banned which took them a grand total of 3 days to accomplish, you are
right Marcus it does tell you where their priorities are, up their ass.
Facter is just spewing more of the we can't be held responsible for it crap,
it's just a cop out.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bcb42$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> All I have to say is get off your high horse and look into what I am
saying.
>
> I have sent you bozos many emails at support at activeworlds.com
>
> Am I lying? ask Fletch. How do I know fletch? well gee I wonder...
>
> You of all people are illustrating exactly how much Active Worlds chooses
to
> ignore the individual like me who is trying to get rid of porn for a good
> cause so kids are not exposed to it.
>
> Every attempt of mine is dealt with by another person. I can't get one
> person to sit down and work this out with me. Each person reads a glimpse
> of my posts and assumes I didn't bring up something they are about to
> propose. I did email, I did contact people, and I tried. Active Worlds
did
> nothing. One email to the server holding the porn, and they did
something.
>
> For your sake, listen to what I have to say, because the next server might
> allow the porn. If you do nothing about it, I will help find someone who
> will put Active Worlds in their place.
>
> Porn should not be easily accessible to children.
>
> If it's not a law yet, call it the Marcus act of 2001
>
>
>
>
> "facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message
> news:3b1bc926$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
*anything*
> on
do
> user
misleading,
> Furthermore,
> level
> not
abuse at activeworlds.com
> not
have
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 6:20pm
uh huh and when I sent private correspondence to people that work directly
for AW.com about being harassed on numerous occassions by a certain
individual they told me to politely kiss off. What makes you think the same
thing won't happen again to Marcus, he told many people, it might not have
been you because you are always so adement about telling us all what you
don't do, how was he to know that you are the director of porn removal now,
you people are really amazing, sending their NG grunt out to clear up their
messes, you guys are a real class act I tell ya, lol
[View Quote]"facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message
news:3b1be19f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bcb42$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> saying.
>
> I *am* Fletch Marcus, and I will publically state here that on this porn
> issue, I have not received *one* email from you on it. We always look into
> these matters, and remove porn if we find it - it is NOt allowed in
> Alphaworld - we do everything we can to monitor it, but, I do not believe
> you have a good understanding of the way that the internet works, nor the
> availability of pornography on the internet, nor the sheer logistics of
> being able to check *EIGHTY MILLION* individual objects that could have
> *anything* attached to them, porn or otherwise. And, you have agreed to
the
> license when using the software, so you know the inherant risks and that
we
> are under no liability if you do discover such material within the
software.
> How often do you email microsoft and complain when you are accidentally
> re-directed to a porn site when using Internet Explorer ?
>
> Again, as I said, email the issue concerned, and they will be
investigated,
> I fail to understand why you are making this into such a huge "AW does
care"
> issue when we obviously do, nor have heard anything in private
> correspondance from you in the matter (well, I have not).
>
> Fletch aka Facter
> AW Support.
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 6:24pm
That's the spirit Marcus, you are finally catching on to what I have been
saying all along. lol Everyone wants to ridicule you for something you did
not do when in actuality you exhausted every avenue and got nowhere, now if
you try to fight back they will find a way to ban you for harassing them for
having porn in their worlds, they have time to ban people that get no
results from their inactions.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bd095$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why don't we get a baton and run from city to city painting it with all
the
> red tape that is being spewed here.
>
> How many contacts does it need to get rid of porn? Why not have people go
> in, see the porn and remove it.
>
> There is a lot of effort here to not do the job, but get around it by
> offering emails.
>
> I did email, and nothing happened until I emailed the server holding the
> porn.
>
> And for allowing the porn to stay in active worlds, I say to Active
Worlds,
> FUCK YOU!!!
>
>
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1bcea2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
enough
> to
> the
> post
> them
is
> a
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 7:21pm
ok I did see the humor in that, LOL So I say fine, and Marcus you work with
Facter on the known places where porn is obviously known to be by you to
have it removed. If he says he will do it then put him to the test and have
him help you get rid of it. He's offered a hand in this to help you I say
you need what little help you are going to get in all this, lol Work with
him and see what can be done. I am starting to become a bit more enlightened
and optomistic but I won't hold my breath just yet, lol
[View Quote]"run facter run" <invurt at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1bf9a8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1bf6b6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> starting on Neo Highway 30500 coords north of GZ and exanding
>
>
> Would someone be able to scan my area for me ?
>
> Its a mass called Alphaworld, it reaches from say, oh, roughly 32000 nsew
> and contains roughly 80 million objects or so, should only take a few
years
> to go through and look at every object individually =)
>
> Please email me if interested !
>
> F
>
> ps - in case anyone is confused, this is a lighthearted, humourous post =P
>
>
> news:3b1bf362 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you
> know, a
> Thanks!
> insure
to
> do.
server
the
> don't
> lots
it
> to
by
> UNITED
*GLOBAL*
> AND
> THOUSANDS
> pornographic
> the
It
> is
> referenced
latest
> url.
it
> on
help
> too.
> time.
> lots
> it to
hooked
> by
it
> have
> around it
> pointing
wa
> s
> email to
macro
> to
> people?
> removed,
not
> try
act
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 7:33pm
now you know why they call him capt MAD mike, LOL Hmm AW is alot closer to
home than I thought, good thing the servers were in a safe bldg during that
quake we had, LOL I bet they did alot of shakin and rattlin tho, lol They
might even be in Bill Gates basement, who knows, lol
[View Quote]"captain mad mike" <cmadmike at crosswinds.net> wrote in message
news:3b1bfaf5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Good god marcus...we've heard it. Lets see...1 man is going up against
> 999999999999999999999999999 (don't give me greif about that number, its an
> exaggeration but it just shows how many there are) porno sites on the net.
> Dude, is it AW's INTENT to share porno? No. In fact, as far as I know most
> people on AW just pictures for non-porno uses (well, at least in AW's real
> towns like SW City, Rosewood, etc.). But some users chose to do that. This
> is almost like the Napster case. In my eyes, Napster was created to allow
> anyone to share any music, and the courts beat them up for the copyright
> stuff but they changed so they wouldn't get taken off the net. Even though
> they still fight back I guess I could say it was NOT their INTENTION to
> "pirate" copyrighted music, thats what the users did.
> Hell I'll go even broader. Was the Internet created to share porno? No,
> it was created to share INFORMATION. But some wierd person decided to
share
> some naked pictures of his girlfriend on it.
>
> Key phrase here: "IT WAS NOT AW'S INTENTION TO SHARE PORNO." And besides,
AW
> is what we could call a "small company," as in it doesn't really have
> offices all over the globe, and big company-like stuff. Its a company,
> operating out of Newburyport, MA, with servers in Seattle. We're not
talking
> about Microsoft here, they could probably afford to screen out all the
porno
> sites on the internet for all I know (but probably not because the
internet
> is quite big). So dude, just drop it.
>
>
> --
> -CMM
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 7:56pm
But Facter does know of people that will get the job done, that's the whole
point of this, finding someone that will get the job done.
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3b1c0320 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL you are being hilarious. You remind me of my mother. "Are you
cleaning
> your room while pluggin away at that computer???" Some people don't care
> about porno or "issues" like that (I happen to like porno :-P, I dunno
about
> the rest of you guys/gals). They look at it and say "whatever" and move
on.
> But you on the other hand are dragging this topic right through the dirt
> (the NG, hehe) and ripping it to shreds. It has become a joke and so have
> you. The porno has been removed and that's that.
>
> His job is not to remove porn either. That is the GET's job for the 100th
> freakin' time. He COULD remove it but he has other jobs to do such as
> answering people's questions about hardware/software problems etc.
> --
> Syntax
> syntax at swcity.net
> www.swcity.net
>
> m a r c u s <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1bfd32 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
do
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 10:13pm
Syntax, Marcus has no way to delete other people's porn, how would you call
him going to AW about it passing the buck, I don't understand that at all,
sheesh think man, lol
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3b1c0499 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ah I see. Marcus does a lot of talking about "passing the buck" but he
> seems to be the biggest buck-passer here. You should apply for the GET,
> Marcus. They could use someone as enthusiastic as you. ;-)
> --
> Syntax
> syntax at swcity.net
> www.swcity.net
>
> chucks party <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1c0421 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> whole
> care
move
dirt
> have
> 100th
> Go
porn.
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 10:17pm
Marcus just block his miserable ignorant ass like I did, lol He ain't even
worth reading or replying to. I find the more I block the more intelligent
people I get to discuss community issues with, with concerned people not the
SNERTATHON that goes in in this NG most of the time. Try it you'll like it,
lol
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1c0ef4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Well then, doesn't like you are getting dick-all this time, partner. So
> change your ways or shut up."
>
> "doesn't like you are getting dick-all this time", hmmm, if only we knew
> what the heck you meant by that. Are you coming on to me?
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1c0dbe at server1.Activeworlds.com...
or
> builds
> next
> authority
report
DESTROYED
is,
copied
It's
> entire
but
the
that's
> you
I
"whatever"
through
> and
for
> etc.
> remove
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 10:25pm
I agree with you there too Marcus, what people do on private owned worlds is
their business and I wouldn't even go that far to persue something like
that, some people I know that have worlds where it is clearly indicated they
are X rated give people the warning needed. But on public build worlds porn
should be removed immediately with no warning to the person and sent a tgram
or email warning to let them know it will not be tolerated in public build
worlds owned by AW.com. That is the responsible thing to do and AW has an
obligation to follow up with those complaints just as they do all others.
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1c04e1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It's got the porn removed so far. I am not saying adults can't view porn.
> Make an adult section where adults can. I'll help you supply the porn if
> you want. Just don't give kids the access to it. When you know a kid can
> get to it, report that like facter as posted in the most recent thread so
> far. See if he or someone else at AW really does take action.
>
> This person who posted the porn, if posted in a proper area would still
have
> the account there probably because I for one would not have gone to the
> extremes to tell others.
>
> I found it in a bad spot so I told others. The server holding the files
> concurred and closed the account. It's in the best interest of those that
> want porn in an adult section to set up an acceptable spot with Active
> Worlds, or else their builds may be altered in a similar manner as I was
> able to effect them.
>
> So far, Active Worlds has not given me any objection as to the actions I
> took by notifying them and the server holding the porn.
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:02pm
syli have you EARNED the respect you deserve here or what LOLOL Are you
following alllllll the rules LOL Oh I almost forgot there are no rules for
this NG but people seem to find them from everyone elses philosophy on what
an NG's rules should be, but they don't apply to this NG, lol
[View Quote]"syli" <rflorez at mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3b1e10f0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol.......there you go again.....grrrrrr....
>
> --
> ~Syli
> "jeiden" <tgrenier1 at mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1db098$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
get
> are
a
> they
smooth.
me
few
in
giving
try
real
is
> who
end
> up
that
> ng
them
> threads
> you
except
thats
> no
(a
webpage
you
used.
to
> easily
> want
and
> #
know
> a
know
> a
anyone
offering
to
Gooood!!!
Yea...thats
of
here
> is
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 6:54pm
Yes I know dear, it's why I am indulging in that little block button now, I
do enjoy your posts and you have something to offer and say, that to me is
more important than wether you are perfectly on topic or not, you are a part
of this Community like everyone else and can post what you like, as I've
said I have no problems with a good clean fair debate, but the attacking and
profanity has got to go and I am making the changes I feel are neccessary to
compose myself and not have to deal with people that incite me to it, LOL So
sorry it won't be me disrespecting you, for that... well um just post
something off topic will ya, LOL
[View Quote]"syli" <rflorez at mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3b1e6c23 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chuck.....irony is, i believe i have followed the charter , but seems i
> still pick up a lump of generalized pre-packaged fragrance enhanced doo
doo
> that isnt supported by the posts placed here from various members of the
> group new and old. I dont mind charter waving flamers so long as they are
> following the charter....does earning respect mean that then i can say and
> do whatever i want in here while waving the charter around under everyone
> else's nose? If so........Puleez disrespect me.....lol
>
> --
> ~Syli
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1e4606 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
for
> what
things
> we
there
> is
> respect
> the
> to
> my
a
> the
crazy
> debate
even
some
I
Respect
> people
you
> experienced
break
> cause
> people
bandwidth
> they
ng
> is
> Its
And
> posts
> might
mistakes)
> confused
> Hypocrites
> the
> "Audition
> Bash
group....its
> a
give
> me
> different
of
more
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2001, 10:27pm
You are wrong, they are obligated to follow up with those complaints just as
they do all others. You are totally missing the point, certifiably
SNERTIFIED.
[View Quote]"moff piett" <piett at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b1c11b0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> awcom isn't obligated to spend their lives searching alpha world for a
> picture that migh offend someone. You should be thankfull for 20 bucks a
> year they do as much as they do. After almost 4 years I've almost never
> seen any questionable content. The odd "so and so is fucking gay"
> vandalism sign here and there in alpha world, but that's about it. Maybe
> you guys should stop looking for porn? Maybe you should get down off your
> high horse standing on a soap box built inside your little sheltered world
> and stop shooting the dead horse that is the porn issue. (talk about a
mixed
> clique!) If it's a problem, it's delt with. It always has been handled
> like this, nothing new. If porn scares you, disable picture downloading.
> If you're still terrified, then maybe you should stop using aw, and for
that
> matter, don't go outsite your house. If the odd pornographic pic in aw
> get's you folks in such a tizzy, I'm sure you'd have a heart attack if you
> went out into the real world and took a look around.
>
> Either shut up about this, or "vote with your feet" and leave aw, because
> we're tired of listening to all this complaining.
>
>
|
|