|
|
sw chris // User Search
sw chris // User Search
Dec 20, 2001, 3:30am
Now wait a minute... what about Old Abe and the America's Cup? There's got
to be video or at least a story of this somewhere, because I gotta see it.
:)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"dabartender" <admin at hooverae.com> wrote in message
news:3c212486 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you have any questions I can help you with, gimme a shout!
> (admin at hooverae.com.) I'll be happy to answer anything I actually know
the
> answer to LOL :D If you haven't seen any of my posts about it in the
past,
> I'm active duty Navy, and have a pretty solid perspective on the way
things
> are right now ;-)
>
> "wing." <wing at systemrecall.com> wrote in message
> news:3c21231b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> for
>
>
>
|
Dec 22, 2001, 1:44am
I bowl "very" occasionally. 104 is my record. ^_^
Great job on your score, btw. Good job. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"tyberius" <tyberius at cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3c22d718$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol I bowl a bit prolly bout 3-4 times a week or so, highest I've gotten
so
> far is 248 almost broke my record last week but cam short by 2 pins,
> needless to say I was a bit pissed lol, congrats on the score.
>
> Tyberius
> "the derek" <imthederek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3c22bb00 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
know,
> last
>
>
|
Dec 29, 2001, 3:43am
I seriously doubt it. I bowl about once every 6 months. =-P
SW Chris
[View Quote]"the derek" <imthederek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3c24279b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> really? kewl i bowl 2 leagues one day a week dont practice much unless its
> vacation days from school.. so you might even bowl more than me
> "tyberius" <tyberius at cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:3c22d718$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> so
> know,
who
>
>
|
Dec 22, 2001, 1:44am
You're brave....
SW Chris
[View Quote]"wing." <wing at systemrecall.com> wrote in message
news:3c23d8da at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Just wondering what the funniest things ever done to a mall Santa are.
>
> Just today, I went to the mall after school and went up to Santa (I'm 15),
> took a seat and asked him for a copy of the naughty list. In particular
the
> naughty little girls part.
>
> Anyone else care to share?
>
>
|
Dec 31, 2001, 6:58pm
Does anybody know what the control and control.cancel newsgroups are on this
newsgroup server? I cannot access them, but control.cancel has about 384
messages in it.
SW Chris
Jan 9, 2002, 1:21am
First everyone accuses of AW of listening to the "big-money customers" in
the big corporations. Now... just now when the perception is getting around
that they're starting to listen to the common user, some people want them to
listen to the big-money customers again. This just goes to show that they
can't please everybody. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bacardibreeze" <mail at lintaylor.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3c35a914$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yes it maybe "productive" IF AWcom realise their big money customers =
> world owners...may..just may..pull out of AW if they don't rethink their
> stratedgy. Surely doing something is more productive than shouting and
> moaning about it? We can but try, can't we?
>
>
|
Jan 9, 2002, 1:23am
That was a low blow. Active Worlds isn't that far gone yet. And I suspect
it won't be for some time yet.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c3882b2$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that's what I'm hoping for, maybe someone a bit more competent than Rick &
> wife...
>
> KAH
>
> "poseidon" <doubleagentjsr at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:3c374344 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it
as
> it
> them?
galixyservers.
> to
revenue,
>
>
|
Jan 9, 2002, 1:24am
btw... SW Comit put in a new 80-pin IDE cable and apparently the browser
works just fine now. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C3622E8.985DACBF at oct31.de...
> If someone cannot run 3.2 because of technical problems ...
>
> cozmo wrote:
just
you
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Jan 28, 2002, 4:10pm
You've got a bit of JFK2-itis going on here. :) The capital words make it
seem like you're shouting, not highlighting a word, so please don't do that.
It's grating on the nerves. Thanks.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c533bf6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
> news:3c4ded7a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
is
>
> Not only that, but all DreamLandPark does is offer up a CUSTOMIZED version
> of THE SAME browser you can get at the AW site itself (the screenshot at
> http://www.dreamlandpark.com/main/tour.html told me THAT much!) Juno does
> (or at least *did* last time I checked) the SAME THING!!! Additionally,
it
> appears that SOMEONE has been LOAFING AOUND on the job because they failed
> to delete any reference to 2.2 and the price for a citizenship is still
> listed at $19.95 a year. Both of which, as we all know by now, have
> changed.
>
> So Data21, you have have your world there (good luck on getting ANY of
your
> old files back though!), but I'd bet I could easily teleport there just by
> using the AW browser (once I get my DirectX problem fixed).
>
> Just my $02 worth...Cheers for now :-)
>
> Patrick Cook
> Owner - Pub 102X
> pchamster at msn.com
> Denver, Colorado
>
>
|
Jan 9, 2002, 5:13pm
To us non-techie types, it looks like the last four posts in this thread are
saying the same thing. *grin*
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c3a402d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> files.
>
> I used function for a lack of a better word. Renderware no longer
supports
> RWX or it's structure, I'd assume. So thus you have to write a function
to
> convert it to the new version of Renderware. Anything can load an RWX
file,
> but it needs to be converted and translated by the rendering engine. So
> thus he needed to rewrite a "renderware function" so RWX was still
> supported. And that's what I was originally talking about.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
>
|
Jan 10, 2002, 4:42pm
SWG baby. ^_^
SW Chris
[View Quote]"commie" <Commie at comxen.com> wrote in message
news:3c3d4292$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I believe its called evercrack :)
>
> Commie
> "facter" <facter at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3c3d2edb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 10, 2002, 11:19pm
Patience. I'm sure this is just an accidental overwrite of the old texture
when the new object set was uploaded.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"donna" <awedonna at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c3dfd06 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My God I hope so!! It was more than awful to see the memorial I made for
my
> Mom such an ugly black and white stripe when i had given her memorial my
> favorite texture....... So much has happened in AW in the last few
weeks,
> I have totally supported AW..... but to change a key texture and then to
> such an awful ugly one.... I am heartbroken... maybe i would'nt be so
upset
> if it had not been at such a centimental build site. but this is an
> important build to me...... I pray they will put back tile 5 as it
> was........... * warm huggz* Donna
> "duskbat" <duskbat at innocent.com> wrote in message
> news:3C3DE5A9.FF03437 at innocent.com...
> correct
> 32658.9S
> the
picture
> in
> there
> back
> see it
> have no
> when
> put
>
>
|
Jan 11, 2002, 3:18am
That's what I'm saying, but I haven't received anything from AWC to tell me
that they confirmed the problem when I sent Support and e-mail. I'm going
to send Gand a mail now.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"donna" <awedonna at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c3e4a31 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So you are saying they may return the texture as it was? Nothing in
> the world could make me happier if they would do that. huggz donna
> "sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
> news:3c3e3da9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> texture
> for
> my
> to
> an
> show
> city,
went
put
> to
you
> did
> please
>
>
|
Jan 11, 2002, 5:08pm
Delete your cache and you'll find your textures have been replaced. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
news:3c3e75a5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That's what I'm saying, but I haven't received anything from AWC to tell
me
> that they confirmed the problem when I sent Support and e-mail. I'm going
> to send Gand a mail now.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "donna" <awedonna at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c3e4a31 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
in
donna
made
memorial
then
so
is
it
dont
> went
> put
me
> you
i
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 3:10am
crufty?????? wha?
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sme" <wahlmb at home.com> wrote in message
news:3c435052$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> An interesting note on this topic:
>
> After I [briefly] viewed the wallh6.rwx file in Notepad I gave it a
> whirl in RWModeler, where it appeared to be perfectly rendered with
neither
> the gray overlapping nor the two-sided triangle that interrupts the frame
of
> the door. Implementation error?
>
> "T-minus 0200 hours till production build! Set warp factor to "crufty!"
>
> ---
> M.E. Wahl
>
> "I find the computer becomes me trouble-shooter.
> My wish is his command!
> Nothing is astute-r
> Than a computer
> When I need...a helping hand!"
> -"Future World" exhibit at Walt Disney World
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 4:28pm
Is that an Aussie word? =P
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sme" <wahlmb at home.com> wrote in message
news:3c442d8f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oops...sorry SW, I got that Stallman book on Jargon for Christmas :)
>
> "Crufty" is an adjective meaning temporarily workable but very poorly
> constructed, like a gingerbread house made with pancakes for want of
graham
> crackers. Right after I hypothesized that the problem with wallh9.rwx was
an
> implementation error of Activeworlds, not a problem with the actual file,
I
> made this joke about what was, possibly, happening at AW Inc right before
> the release of 3.2:
>
>
> My jokes suck :P
>
> --
> Sme
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 6:36pm
To get money, they'd need support.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"blasto" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c447ce9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There's so many of these, I'm not even going to respond anymore. It just
> wastes my time. LOL, but basically AWC doesn't give a shit. They want your
> money, not your support.
> "niki" <niki at niki.be> wrote in message
> news:3c435325 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 16, 2002, 9:12pm
You say "AWC doesn't give a shit" ... I say "Clearly, too many people do not
value AW enough to give a shit back".
Translated, it reads: You say "AWC doesn't care about us" ... I say
"Clearly, too many people do not value AW enough to give care back".
... or something like that.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c45b995 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol,cool down. well i total agree with ya,except the last part, cuz i
didnt
> understand it. well unless u mean that the management dont know the true
> value of AW technology then i also agree :)
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c44c1d3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
hell
> frikkin
perceived
> it
> never
> not
just
> your
>
>
|
Feb 13, 2002, 4:21pm
Oh don't worry, I don't think anyone has any problem with the PKs and GKs.
It's the fact that it seems JP didn't bother to mention it to everyone else
and that there has as yet been no explaination from on high as to why this
new policy is being implemented.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"rashal" <RaShaL at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c6a0e43$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "sinew" <citizenaw at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c6954bf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ::::: irrelavant information clipped ::::::
a
NAC
PK's,
> citizens,
know
>
> ::::snip::::
>
> I must interject .. at the risk of being argumentative, <and not meaning
to
> be mind you> I must say that the meeting <tho long over and a dead issue
at
> that> was originally a GK meeting.. PK's were invited last minute... and
if
> you read back a ways <header is Active Worlds and originates from tyberius
> on 2/3/02, bodhitah's post is dated 2/4/02 at 5:21pm and is the second
> reply to the original post.> , you'll see where the leak was.. someone
> posted it in these newsgroups. The person that posted that .. no PK knows
> who that person is..
>
> So please, before you accuse.. do everyone right and be sure :)
>
> Ra
>
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 3:06am
Go here and read up on why they need help and see if you can't contribute.
It's a short read, so please click on it. Thanks!
http://www.lindows.com/lindows_michaelsminutes.php
SW Chris
Jan 16, 2002, 9:27pm
Actually, it hasn't reached court yet. That happens Feb. 1st. Pray and
hope for Lindows. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c449e35 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
"window"
> in
>
> MS is peeing their pants from what I see. They can't compete with a
product
> the runs both windows and linux software! Especially when it's half the
> price. I like their screenshots, nice KDE feel to it while still keeping
> that usability approach. Maybe they should change their company name to
> "Window" and sue Microsoft for using Window in their product Windows :).
I
> can't believe a court system is letting this ride. Windows is an English
> word, let me copyright Wind and sue them for using it. You just can't do
> that.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
>
|
Jan 17, 2002, 3:06pm
Yes, but he precedent is on Lindows side in that case. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"holistic1" <tkafader at pattan.k12.pa.us> wrote in message
news:3C46BE12.4A4DEDCE at pattan.k12.pa.us...
> Maybe not, Kah, but what could be even worse is if Microsoft sues for the
"Look
> and Feel" of Lindows. If you remember, Apple sued Billy Boy for that
exact
> same thing. And the only thing that got Microsoft out of that lawsuit was
by
> investing a big bunch of money into Apple Inc. From the "look" of the
offered
> screenshots on Lindows site, it would 'appear' that Microsoft would have
such a
> case. (heaven forbid).
>
> Just an observation.
>
> Holistic1
>
> kah wrote:
>
the
"window" in
contribute.
>
|
Jan 17, 2002, 8:15pm
Well KAH, they aren't suing because it looks like Windows. They're sueing
because Microsoft "says" that consumers will confuse Windows and Lindows
products. It's a stretch, considering most people aren't that stupid, most
people buy systems that have Windows preinstalled on them, most people won't
ever hear of Lindows in the first place, and no people will see it on store
shelves. You can only buy it online.
SW Chris
p.s. You're right about most American lawsuits that make the news. :)
Remember McDonalds vs. that dinky gourmet muffin store that had "McMuffin"
in its name?
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c472d2c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hmmm... If it's not directly copying a copyrighted design, how can they
have
> a case? it has much more of a KDE feel to it from what I can see off those
> screenshots... What a typical American lawsuit, I think someone should go
> through US laws and do something about the laws that let crazy companies
> like MS do that kind of crap, because this sort of stuff doesn't seem to
> happen elsewhere (no offence meant...), and it's pretty darn stupid.
>
> KAH
>
> "holistic1" <tkafader at pattan.k12.pa.us> wrote in message
> news:3C46BE12.4A4DEDCE at pattan.k12.pa.us...
the
> "Look
> exact
was
> by
> offered
> such a
> the
> "window" in
boycott
suits!
> contribute.
>
>
|
Jan 18, 2002, 2:24am
Well, Agent, if you don't want it, that's fine. But you don't need to put
it down. The reason I'm getting this OS is that it promises full Windows
support in the next few versions. Right now they got the XP versions of MS
Office to work, and hopefully they'll have full DirectX support in there by
the 1.0 launch. I'm not paying for "insider" information, I'm paying for
something to run my 3D games and Windows programs on that doesn't cost $120
to upgrade every time a new version comes out. Linux? Probably half of
those buying Lindows could care less. It's not Microsoft, yet runs programs
made for Windows, and that's its big selling point. :)
Bit of clarification: The CEO himself said it would only be available
online (I think I remember that correctly, from his most recent letter). I
might be wrong though.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c47653e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
version
> of
fee
>
> Well it's precompiled in the OS. Which means it has better support and
it's
> more usable then WINE itself is. Might even be better DX compatible then
> WINE is right now. Who knows.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Jan 19, 2002, 2:14am
> Their site mentions that if you want to beta test or have "insider"
> information, you have to pay $100...
Right. I also thought that price also included the Operating System when it
does launch. I'm not paying for "insider information" either. ;) Not till
they actually start beta testing. With Microsoft after them, a beta might
be all they're going to get finished. :(
Jan 19, 2002, 11:41pm
Hmm.. Windows 95 right? If the browser didn't come with the OS, then this
might not work. If it did, then just reinstall Windows 95 over your current
installation, because I'm sure it will work. I've done it before. :) Then
re-upgrade your browser and you'll be fine.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"casay" <casay2 at attbi.com> wrote in message
news:3c4a1345$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> <start rant>
> Yes, US Court system has really screwed up over the recent MS lawsuit. I
> always thought the origional charge was that they were making computer
> makers install MS software, show it on the desktop and not provide other
> competing software. In particular Internet Explorer. Of course MS put IE
> withing the operating system too and that was supposed to be removed too.
>
> So what happens?
> First result - Split MS up into two seperate companies. ( Tossed out as an
> option)
> 2nd result - Make MS buy PC's and provide software free to schools ( Like
> that was a 'penalty' to MS as the school system was one of the few places
> they didn't have a monopoly.) Apple and the other states that abstained
> disputes it and now waiting on solution #3.
>
> My .02 on this
> 1) Any Federal judge making a ruling on technology MUST be under that age
of
> 50, be a consumer on the Internet and understand the basics of how a PC
and
> the Internet works. We have to many judges making decisions about things
> they simply do not understand at all. Comparing Napster & MP3.com is a
good
> example of them not understanding the technology. Napster NEVER had ANY
> files on their servers. They provided peer to peer file transfer with the
> ability to search other PC's for information. That's no different than ICQ
> having peer to peer or using any basic search engine for information on
> other PC's and servers. Napster or ANY peer to peer technology cannot
> control its users and how they use the technology. MP3.com provided space
> for the files, kept the files on their systems and allowed ppl to upload
and
> download to that server. That's a whole different ballgame.
>
> 2) #3 Judgement should be
> Do not allow MS to provide ANY free software. If consumers want it they
have
> to purchase it. For example - I buy a new PC from Dell, I get to choose
the
> software AND operating system I want and pay ( something ) to have MS
> software. This should be for at least a 4 year period since that's about
> how long it took IE to run Netscape into the ground. I should be allowed
to
> have various options like to have Netscape or WordPerfect instead of IE
and
> Word. I should not be forced to only have a choice of MS products. :-(
>
> This would hit MS where it hurts and go a LONG way toward other companies
> having some kind of chance at getting a share of the market back. Isn't
that
> was this was all about in the first place????? Shouldn't the result of the
> lawsuit address that?
>
> I should have FULL license to the software I get with my PC. The MS
software
> I got with my last PC is for use ONLY on this PC as the license is for the
> software on this particular hardware ONLY. I got the software but if I
want
> a new PC and remove the software from the old one I can't use it on an old
> PC. I don't even have a license to the OS, only to be used on this one PC.
> Example - Say I want to purchase XP and put on this PC. I should be able
to
> take the existing Windows ME and put it on another machine I have. I
> can't!!!
>
> MAKE MS REMOVE IE from the OS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Immediately, now, provide
> EVERYONE a new OS that doesn't have it in it. My reasoning - I am
currently
> having problems with a kernall32.dll error. I CANNOT fix it by doing a
basic
> 'over install' of my OS beacause I upgraded my IE. Now, why shouldn't I be
> able to fix my operating system because I updated a
> program??????????????????????????????? *yes, I'm very mad about all this!*
> This is probably one of the strongest reasons to MAKE them take a PROGRAM
> from the Operating system.
>
> <end rant>
> Casay
>
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3c472d2c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> have
those
go
> the
> was
have
using
> boycott
> suits!
>
|
Jan 19, 2002, 11:44pm
btw... If you've never reformatted before, I would suggest you do so if
you're still in Win95. It'll boost your performance a bit and get rid of
that kernel32.dll error. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
news:3c4a202f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmm.. Windows 95 right? If the browser didn't come with the OS, then
this
> might not work. If it did, then just reinstall Windows 95 over your
current
> installation, because I'm sure it will work. I've done it before. :)
Then
> re-upgrade your browser and you'll be fine.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "casay" <casay2 at attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:3c4a1345$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
too.
an
Like
places
age
> of
> and
> good
the
ICQ
space
> and
> have
> the
about
> to
> and
companies
> that
the
> software
the
> want
old
PC.
> to
> currently
> basic
be
this!*
PROGRAM
they
> those
> go
companies
to
for
that
lawsuit
the
> have
> using
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2002, 3:22am
Deleting your Windows directory will erase any drivers she has. That's not
a good thing to do. Especially with Windows 95, since most likely it won't
install the drivers in the setup program, because it doesn't have them.
SW Chris.
[View Quote]"foxmccloud" <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
news:3c4a270e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Reformatting helps little, except for defragmenting... good ol' deltree
C:\Windows and then reinstall it works very well, and you
> don't lose all the content of your disk
>
> Fox Mc Cloud
>
> "sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> a écrit dans le message news:
3c4a2106$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
of
lawsuit. I
computer
other
put IE
as
abstained
that
PC
things
is a
ANY
with
than
on
cannot
upload
they
choose
MS
allowed
IE
:-(
Isn't
of
for
I
an
one
able
provide
a
shouldn't I
off
should
seem
stupid.
sues
for
of
would
for
contain
should
law
can't
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2002, 6:18pm
True, true. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"foxmccloud" <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
news:3c4a5885$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well reformatting wouldn't keep the drivers either :P
> Reinstalling windows over an older install, without deleting the older
windows dir, does nearly nothing...
> And drivers can be downloaded :)
>
> Fox Mc Cloud
>
> "sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> a écrit dans le message news:
3c4a53f8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
not
won't
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2002, 6:23pm
Ah, if it's Windows ME, then you can go and just run the Setup program from
your CD. It'll restore Windows and Internet Explorer to its original state.
Then you just have to download the critical updates and the new browser
again. ;)
Copy the files in the Win9x folder on your CD to C:\Windows\Options\Cabs.
Restart into Safe Mode and run the Setup program from the Cabs folder. If
there is an error with Setup in Safe Mode, use a boot disk and boot into DOS
and run Setup from there.
Trust me, this works. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"casay" <casay2 at attbi.com> wrote in message
news:3c4b01b3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Windows Me, not 95. Yes the browser IE5 came with the OS. I've upgrade to
> IE6, hence the problem just replacing the kernal32.dll. Yes, would take
> reformatting my PC to fix this.
>
> How did this happen you may ask? I went to the MS update site, did the
> 'critical' update and any non-MS program gives me the kernal32.dll error.
> Figures huh?
>
> Casay
> "sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
> news:3c4a202f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this
> current
> Then
I
other
IE
> too.
as
> an
> Like
> places
abstained
> age
PC
things
a
ANY
> the
> ICQ
on
> space
upload
they
choose
> about
allowed
IE
> companies
Isn't
> the
> the
> old
> PC.
able
provide
I
> be
> this!*
> PROGRAM
> they
should
> companies
seem
> to
> for
> that
> lawsuit
> the
would
>
|
|
