1  ...  63  64  65  66  67  68  ...  101  |   Order by default

Dec 13, 2001, 2:22am

This is to come to no offense but there is a news group dedicated to AWTeen
itself.. this really does belong there rather then here. Glad you just
started it there ;)

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 14, 2001, 4:19pm

> I totally disagree with your comment about "the greater community" and I
> refer you to the community charter (which I have posted).

No, the community doesn't want to hear about most of this AWTeen specific
stuff. If they did they'd either head to the General Discussion (where this
belongs) or the AWTeen newsgroups (which is more appropriate). As long as
they follow the rules we'll accept their posts.. (and by rules I mean the
ones specifically set up for it, not a charter you made).

--Bowen--

Dec 14, 2001, 6:06pm

> Goober's keepin it real and layin down the law. awwwwww yeahhh.

Lmao that was good Moff

--Bowen--

Dec 14, 2001, 7:40pm

> Conflict about AWTeen pertains to all of us and the Active Worlds
community
> in general. It meets the criteria of the charter so you have absolutely
no
> right to tell AW kids to post their comments elsewhere.
>
> Listen up kids, you are welcome to dine at the table with the adults
> anytime.

If they follow the rules of course they can, as you said, aw community in
*general*. Had this had been posted in *General* Discussion then there
would be no trouble, and this should've been in AWTeen's newsgroup since it
was set up for exactly this problem. Community pertains to everyone, not
just a select group and if anything bad happens in AWTeen, it doesn't really
effect any of the non-AWTeen goers.

--Bowen--

Dec 15, 2001, 12:07am

LoL :) that's very true.. Imagine if all of them knew about the newsgroups..
the teen discussions that would go on.. oh my.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 15, 2001, 4:40pm

Exactly :)

--Bowen--

Dec 14, 2001, 6:16pm

And a Happy Hanukah :)

--Bowen--

Dec 16, 2001, 2:22pm

Source code available?

--Bowen--

Dec 16, 2001, 3:52pm

Ok cool, anything wrong if I try to convert this into C++? LoL

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 18, 2001, 10:48pm

I don't even know what he's talking about here..

"I was just thinking what 3d design on the internet might become. Imagine
being able to scan in a picture and have a build set to fit the picture with
object creating like we can now with ASCII art."

3d objects are infinitely more complex then ASCII.. let alone art made with
it.. so.. reading this slowly.. you want to be able to make object sets with
millions of vertices using "shapes" ? Like a sphere connected to another
sphere connected to a couple of more spheres to make something like a globe
out of it? That would be similar to ASCII art.. since a E is made up of a
thousand tiny little E's. That's as best as I could make out of that

--Bowen--

Dec 18, 2001, 10:55pm

But that's not how he was explanining it.. LoL like ASCII art.. is drawn out
by all the characters.. how would that even be similar? :) Sorry it's hard
to understand this.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2001, 7:12pm

It'd be 1970. Some versions of windows can go up to 20002001. Especially
those foreign versions.. right Fox? LoL

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2001, 8:40pm

Yeah.. ok..?

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2001, 11:12pm

Wow I agree with a lot of that :). I still enjoy building, it's one of the
better things in AW. Even with all those new features.. a good ol'
fashioned building spree always is fun :)

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2001, 11:41pm

Well we could try being a little nicer to everyone :) maybe it'll rub off
hehe. Doubtful but it's worth a try.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2001, 11:53pm

Yeah I agree.. I think a couple of us modelers should get together and make
a couple brand new sets for AW :). I'm up for it once I finish some things
;). What about anyone else?

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 18, 2001, 12:39am

That'd be nice.. I wish we could get those mars section pieces in AW.. those
would make my day complete :). LoL still it'd be nice for us Non-AWTeen
people to be able to use our objects and see others use them in a PBW.

--Bowen--

Dec 18, 2001, 2:29am

There's quite a few.. not enough to be that big of a pain to the nicer areas
but they're easily found if you look :)

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 18, 2001, 5:31pm

> As this survey was conducted as part of a business proposal I have no
> intention of disclosing any results apart from general observations made
by
> respondents.

Surveys are meant for the data to be realeased to the public *without
mentioning specific people*. What's the point in doing it if you're not
going to display the "shocking" truth about all the statistics. Yes I can
see why a company would want to research it, but if it's AW that conducted
it I'll understand. But I'd really like to see those results too. :)

--Bowen--

Dec 18, 2001, 5:59pm

lmao :) yeah that's true.. registries make no sense the way the make them
up.. seems like they have the ability to protect against a new Vertical
rotation since they have X Y and Z values.. but the Y values are ignored by
AW...

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 11:49pm

He's probably just hanging around.. Eep are you out there? :) Or maybe he
can't post anymore.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 24, 2001, 2:55pm

His posts are fine.. if AW's going to violate business regulations and
laws.. something needs to be said. And while we're on this subject.. why
are you bringing it up again? He's obviously not trying to.. in fact he's
even giving away some objects.. just leave him alone, it's the holidays.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 24, 2001, 5:51pm

> I agree; those are two nice object sets. I don't have anything against
> them. However, I don't think I should just sit idly by, even if it is
> the holidays. If someone hacked into your bank account and stole all of
> your money, I'm sure you wouldn't brush it off and forgive the person
> because "it's the holidays."

Bad analogy.. he isn't hacking just using his freedom of speech and
capitilism to say it with more then one alias :) LOL.

>Look, I don't want to start a fight; I just
Neither do I.

> do not want Insanity to cause another newgsroup ruckus like before. I'm
> hoping he will behave this time. If he does, then great...you can forget
> I even made this post in the first place. If not, then I'm afraid
> history will repeat itself.

I'm sure he won't :) we can get on his butt if he does, how's that? :)

Oh and in response to my previous post.. the if AW violated regulations and
laws.. then something needs to be said.. well we know AW wouldn't do that.
If they did they'd quickly fix it. Noelle didn't just say that he had to do
it.. there was another option to call in.. truth is I wouldn't send any
vital info over e-mail either :). But they didn't straight out ask for the
Card #.. just for the information about the card.. Hope AW doesn't hate me
for saying that something needs to be said if they violate laws ;) hehe.
*looks the other way and whistles* j/k :P Sorry the medicine I'm taking is
making me goofy

--Bowen--

Dec 26, 2001, 9:32pm

LoL no, damn isn't a bad word... even preachers say damn.. how bad can it
be? I believe some children go to church.. and hear damn.. how much worse
could it be if you say it?

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 26, 2001, 10:27pm

Well.. most of them are from the "old" days when the world was a lot
different.. It really has no place in modern day English-speaking places.
Damn isn't a bad word, the same way Hell isn't. There's worse words that
people should be concerned with. Now if someone was saying "DAMN YOU" yes,
then it's a bad word :)

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 26, 2001, 10:48pm

Exactly how I feal ;). I really hate the "hacker" talk. LoL

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 26, 2001, 11:21pm

LMAO yeah "chatturz" works for them.

I used "hacker" like that because that's why they do it :).. they want to be
thought of as hackers but they're nothing more then 12 year old kiddies..
maybe of the script variety. True hackers follow written English
standards.. just a word out to all you "hacker" wannabes.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 27, 2001, 1:56am

Cozmo's right.. that's how hacker wannabe's talk.. and it's "leet".. Elete
*Elite* wouldn't be the proper spelling of it. Ask Andras or Ananas how
they speak English.. I bet they follow the rules pretty closely.. they are
hackers to the true definition :). Most true hackers are offended by
"cracker" like talking. Including the use of the z for s.. ie appz, crackz,
etc al.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 27, 2001, 4:12am

You're thinking cracker ;).. Hackers are people who know an extreme amount
of information on computers, networks, hardware, software, and programming
languages. People who talk like that are saying they're hackers.. while
they may be somewhat they're trying to imitate "crackers" because they want
to make you think they can do things they really can't :) On the other
hand, a hacker won't really care what you think he can do.. he'll just do it
if it needs to be done.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Dec 28, 2001, 3:18am

Well :) you're not really talking.. you're typing, so you're making major
grammatical mistakes. Talking like that is acceptable as long as you don't
say crap, shit, etc al.. it gets worse as you go on LoL. "however" :) Sorry
I can't resist to correct errors. Don't mind my drive-by posting.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

1  ...  63  64  65  66  67  68  ...  101  |   Order by default