1  ...  35  36  37  38  39  40  ...  101  |   Order by default

Jul 24, 2002, 10:00pm

http://web.archive.org/web/20001217235400/www.channel1.com/users/jpmc/

That's JP's

--Bowen--

Jul 28, 2002, 2:10am

Use linux for AW:

http://www.omegauniverse.com/awlin34.jpg

Works better than dx8 mode in Windows and it's all Software mode. I can
give details on how to get it working if you're bold enough (pre 3.4
versions have some nasty bugs you'll have to get used to).

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Jul 28, 2002, 1:39pm

> Joe is worried about all the "spyware" in Windows XP, well their own
policy
> means you have to be told about every single bit of info regarding what
your
> doing. And if even thats too much, do the obvious thing, find out which
DLL
> is sending the crap, open it in res edit or binary and rip out or edit a
few
> resource strings which point to microsoft, with any luck you will screw
its
> reporting features up so bad it wont send anything. Also, dissable things
> like keep track of your records, kill cookies and any ad/spy-ware and turn
> of things that can directly ID you such as windows media player... another
> hint for people like Joe cause its probably highly related to him (sorry
> mate, couldent resist).. is dont go downloading things like "The free porn
> dialer - for all your hardcore needs" cause as soon as you get a cookie
with
> at sextracker on it ur life and ur POP3 will become worthless.

That's illegal my friend. If you do this, you will be considered a
"cracker" and no longer be able to install XP with your current key. Don't
auto accept cookies, and don't go to sex websites, you're saved from those
2.

--Bowen--

Jul 28, 2002, 2:14pm

> Over half of XP machines are cracked anyway o_0, besides, just use a
> firewall to block the strings

That doesn't make it right to do. Firewalls may not be able to detect it.
Microsoft would have thought ahead for that one.

--Bowen--

Jul 28, 2002, 2:27pm

Ah to your knowledge yes. Microsoft doesn't make everything known either.
There's some secret files they use for making their programs that they don't
release.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Jul 28, 2002, 2:39pm

Nah, the freedom of information acts don't include what your computer sends
about what you do.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Jul 28, 2002, 3:07pm

I don't think we have that here in the US. The only way it would is if the
gov't collects it, and keeps it on file. Not what a company does by
tricking you into agreeing to it in the EULA.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Jul 29, 2002, 1:47pm

Yes it is, this is a major bug and should be fixed.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 1, 2002, 1:59pm

> Perhaps it would help if more people were on the beta rather than the
> same 10 people every time. :P

I'm new to the beta team, only by accident it seems.

--Bowen--

Aug 1, 2002, 6:59pm

It shouldn't be... just completely remove that universe line.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 1, 2002, 8:44pm

You said yourself that someone was on his privs. That would mean that he
could eject (and especially if he's on someone elses he has no ejection
protection).

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 1, 2002, 10:37pm

Make more sense in your posts if you want me to understand them correctly.
Paragraphs are a wonderful thing.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 2, 2002, 12:21am

It was your choice to post in hopes of getting an answer. Quite simply, if
you wanted help or rather "reasons" to why it happened, you should've made
it more clear. But it's moot.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 2, 2002, 1:08am

He's just mad at me because I didn't let him into my awesomely uberific
world that's so full of objects everyone but him was in it (all 4 of them).
So I assume he's trying to vent on me everywhere. Paragraphs are the bomb
though, people don't realize how great they are and how fun they are to use.
:)

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 2, 2002, 3:56am

> I'm not trying to start anything... whenever I attempt to talk to him it's
> an arguement, I'm also told that maki is a female japanese name, oh well

It is. Unless of course, you were trying to be a Mak(a/e/o/u) clone.

> then, and asked if I like older women because of who I chat with on aw?

Ok? Is this relevant to the discussion no? If you didn't want me to retort
back to you, why did you insintantly call me gay? Right on.

> hah...ok then...don't come flaming me ... you think it's all me being an
ass

I'm flaming now; too bad, so sad.

> and trying to start things...think what you want...and what not, and I
> wasn't trying to flame you, just reply...I'm done with these horrible
> newsgroups and the awful people that dwell within them, I at the least
wont
> be starting any topics (aka arguements) from now on..it's waste of my time
> (yes I don't have the time to sit here and explain everything...and on
every
> other post...)

*clap* I really do think you're still being dorky because I wouldn't let
you into my world. I'm sure you would come back and say something to this
affect "No, I really don't care." Or rather something of that sort, most
people would. Oh well. If you didn't want a flame, you shouldn't have
posted what you did.

--Bowen--

Aug 2, 2002, 2:57pm

> And Bowen, here's a tip: If it didn't happen in the NGs, keep it out of
> the NGs. We don't care about you and Maki's little tiff about your
> world, so stick to e-mail if you two must bicker. Same goes to you,
> Maki. No wonder no one wants to post in here! :P

LoL Oh well now, he boinked me off.

--Bowen--

Aug 5, 2002, 7:34pm

I'm suddenly beginning to think Insanity wasn't that bad of a person...

--Bowen--

Aug 5, 2002, 10:39pm

Argh I'm sick of this split personality CRAP. You don't hear the voices in
your head as other people, thus you are JFK1, 2, 3, or whatever combination
you want.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 6, 2002, 5:29am

I'm going to eat your brains if you don't stop soon...

--Bowen--

Aug 6, 2002, 5:40am

Good god, I tried to stay out of this silly debate but it's gone too wiley.

> As i keep telling you I have no idea who JFK2 is?

Your newsreader headers clearly state that you are either Mr. Kieffer who
lives in Syracuse, NY or a very, very good cracker (which you are not).

> BUT i can tell you who he isn't....

Tell me, tell me master!

> He isn't JFK1 as the only JFK1 died in an unfortunate incident in 1963.

John F. Kennedy did. There is no 1 in his name. Acronyms are a funny
thing, people always think you're talking about something/one else.

> He isn't plain old JFK as there is allready someone with a CIT that uses
> the name JFK in AW. [Or at least DID as of the last time he told me he
> tried to use that name sometime back about 2 yrs ago.]

Proabably. It was a sarcastic comment. I'm sorry if that wasn't clear.

> He isn't JFK2 as there isn't a JFK2... YET. There is a GFK but no JFK2

I'm lost again, I really need to find some more frogs to lick...

> Now i do know that there is this dude in many Uni's including AWEDU
> Universe that uses the name of either Just In or [UNI Just In as in OW
> Just In for instance...]
>
> Maybe who you seek is Just In in some far of Galaxy [Sally's Place, 3DEE,
> Phoenix] or Just In in some far off Universe.
>
> BUT i do know that there isn't any JFK2 in AW...
> All that there is in aw is OhhhhMy

Please do not start with the third person again, it is quite annoying to say
the least. I'm simply saying you are all one in the same, just like
Insanity is Filmkr is Lars Wyka (sorry it's the only comparison I could
think of at 3:20 in the morning). "JFK2" has been known to notoriously plug
OW in as many ways as he can, in newsgroups, e-mails, etc, and you've done
that as well. The newsreader headings do not lie, as I stated earlier.

I hope to all hopes this will be the last post I have to put in this thread
that has any substantial information whatsoever.

--Bowen--

Aug 6, 2002, 5:40am

> Ohh NO...And *I* thought Filmkr was BAD but THIS guy makes Filmkr look
> AWFULLY DAMN GOOD right now....

Man I hear an echo...

--Bowen--

Aug 6, 2002, 3:23pm

> Believe me.... You would do yourself a HUGE favor by eating my brains...
>
> 1 - You would gain an enormous amount of intelligence of the likes you
> have never seen before.

As apposed to my already high IQ?

> 2 - It is much tastier than "LICKING FROGS"

Wow someone really doesn't understand sarcasm.

> 3 - And.... Just maybe.... After you gain such intelligence of the
> likes.... You might want to donate some poor person your weak minded
> brains.... [ME] Some brain is better than no brain.

I would guess your IQ is 90 from that statement. But no you'll come back
and tell me it's 130 or something of that sort. You just said you were
smarter, why would you need to be smart if you're already smart? Right, you
contradicted yourself, good job.

> You see.... By eating my brains.... What joy and pleasures you can
> have.... After you read this i'm sure you will pack your bags and head
> to the nearest door and head to whereever you think this poor dude may be
> located... [Last time i looked i thought i was under some bridge in
> Summerland Estates.... But i could be wrong.]

Gerald Kieffer, your seemingly alter ego, lives in Syracuse NY. As do most
of the other freaking Kieffer's.

*snip useless garbage*

You seem to talk about nothing when you're bored. I think you like to start
fights.

--Bowen--

Aug 7, 2002, 8:27pm

> Hey, I have a high IQ too! Isn't it just swell?

Yeah it is, I'm just glad he's gone.

--Bowen--

Aug 6, 2002, 5:00pm

*claps* yay! Flagg's my hero.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 6, 2002, 11:38pm

DOS understands filenames. That's why windows pre95 had the 8 character
limit on filenames...

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

Aug 7, 2002, 1:47am

[View Quote] Yeah, that's how it worked.

> Newer versions of Windows aren't based off of DOS. Now you need a boot
disk
> to get to just DOS. Windows now only supports the command line...

Still based on DOS code, it just doesn't use the standard interface for it.
Unless they went to rewrite the kernel from scratch (which they obviously
would never do until they absolutely needed it *cough*64bitwindows*cough*).
They add and subtract things from their kernel since Windows95, that's why
there's so many errors with kernel32.dll.

--Bowen--

Aug 7, 2002, 2:48am

> NT != Dos based.

LoL well, NT was based off of 3.11 which was based off of 3.1 which was a
DOS shell.

--Bowen--

Aug 7, 2002, 3:17am

> NT doesn't boot through DOS. Not sure about NT3.5 (I never had
> that), but NT4 boots a kernel that is mostly 32-bit and not DOS
> based at all. It includes a DOS emulation and a 32-Bit console
> program that behaves like DOS. All 16-Bit DOS programs are
> executed by the emulation and 16-bit windows programs each have
> their own virtual machine.
> For NT they took several ideas from Unix and implemented them,
> or at least tried to *g

Yeah I think 3.5 was based really a lot on 3.11 so it basically used Dos. I
would imagein NT used that, they put in BSD code in XP. That's probably why
it's better at not crashing.

> Win95 (which was based on 3.11) boots a DOS with some 32-Bit
> extensions and then boots the "kernel" from there. I think you
> mixed those two up.

Isn't that what I said? It's late. 3.1(1) is a dork to keep track of.

--Bowen--

Aug 7, 2002, 3:16pm

> Always thought they stole most of NT from IBM in their 'joint' OS/2
> project?

LoL Microsoft steals everything from everybody. Weren't win3.1 and win95
based on 2 of the mac versions? Then so was XP (kind of based on OSX).
They usually just steal bits and pieces of other OS's and jam them in there.

--Bowen--

Aug 8, 2002, 1:29pm

Ok, it's nice that you watch star trek a lot, but it's getting really old.

--Bowen--

[View Quote]

1  ...  35  36  37  38  39  40  ...  101  |   Order by default