ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Teleportation - Flitting all over the place? (General Discussion)
Teleportation - Flitting all over the place? // General DiscussionyanstAug 8, 2002, 12:54am
Source: http://www.synergycorp.com/nwt/uz/uz0p3.htm
Date: December 12, 1995 In part reads: "Since I came to AlphaWorld, the number one question I have heard from almost everyone was "how do you teleport?" Finally we are at the point where we are about to get that feature! However, there will be limits. The intention as I understand it is to have web-page-based teleport where you can teleport directly to any spot in AlphaWorld, so you can make lists of "hot link lists" on web pages, but that will be the only way to go exactly where you want to go. One important concept is is that we don't want to spoil the simulation of reality achieved in AlphaWorld so far...and if everyone is flitting all over the place all the time that goes down the drain (it's bad enough sometimes with the current WARP feature.) " ---------------------------- Question. Does "flitting all over the place all the time" spoil the simulation fo reality achieved in Alpha World? dionAug 8, 2002, 12:57am
tony mAug 8, 2002, 4:58am
As large as AlphaWorld is, do you honestly expect people to walk for 3+ hours on end just to find their place?
[View Quote] >Question. Does "flitting all over the place all the time" spoil the >simulation fo reality achieved in Alpha World? > daphneAug 8, 2002, 6:29am
Hey guys... Look at the date of the article... :o) I'd say is a bit of
AW history... :o) ncc 72897Aug 8, 2002, 8:58am
its called technology advance (matter transporter)
if u look at it this way its not unrealistic at all, welcome to the 24th century :P [View Quote] lioness.Aug 8, 2002, 12:20pm
I could be wrong but ....Don't we ALREADY have teleport capabilities???? Are
you referring to that neat feature near the top of the screen that says "teleport" where you can either type in coordinates or "remember" places to go????? ;-") [View Quote] bowenAug 8, 2002, 1:29pm
dionAug 8, 2002, 5:22pm
dionAug 8, 2002, 5:23pm
Actually, scientists have managed to learn how to transport photons and
although transporting matter made up of trillions of pieces is far in the future, it has become a more realistic idea. [View Quote] bowenAug 8, 2002, 5:30pm
I know, but it's far from the star trek idea of how it'd work. All you have
to do is resequence the photons in a different order for movement, then resequence them as the arive in the new position. I think they can only move them like 5 inches before the stream fades. --Bowen-- [View Quote] bowenAug 8, 2002, 5:56pm
Yeah they tested it with an apple.. needless to say the whole apple didn't
go with them. And if they moved it too far only half the apple came with them. --Bowen-- [View Quote] dionAug 8, 2002, 9:57pm
LMAO. If they tried, they failed but I'm sure most scientists would never
attempt such an idiotic thing. What they have accomplished so far is not even close to transporting matter of any sort, let alone anything nearly as complex as a piece of fruit. I'm sorry to say that you heard wrong. [View Quote] dionAug 8, 2002, 11:35pm
You can if you like but if it does exist, those were some stupid scientists.
:-P I can guarantee it didn't work if it did anything at all, LOL :-D [View Quote] alphabit phalphaAug 8, 2002, 11:40pm
Wow...you just got me to thinking......
Imagine what they could do in medicine if this were possible! Cancer cells could be identified...located...then transported out of the infected body! Now Dion....please don't tell me you would have laughed at Columbus when he said the world wasn't flat:) Anything is possible...eventually. bowenAug 8, 2002, 11:46pm
> Wow...you just got me to thinking......
> Imagine what they could do in medicine if this were possible! > Cancer cells could be identified...located...then transported out of the > infected body! You'd have to hold the person completely still. The only place this would be possible is probably in space so gravity doesn't affect it (you're in free fall in space). > Now Dion....please don't tell me you would have laughed at Columbus when he > said the world wasn't flat:) Nuclear physics was developed by aristotle(or one of those greek/roman dudes) I believe, he feared releasing his discoveries because of the way it may have confliced with his riligion. --Bowen-- alphabit phalphaAug 9, 2002, 12:01am
You'd have to hold the person completely still. The only place this would
be possible is probably in space so gravity doesn't affect it (you're in free fall in space). What about vacumn tube thingys? bowenAug 9, 2002, 12:05am
> What about vacumn tube thingys?
Human life cannot survive in a complete vaccuum, not even a partial one. --Bowen-- dionAug 9, 2002, 12:06am
It's a common misconception that during the time of Columbus, most people
though the world was flat. Actually, during that time, it was a well-known idea that the world wasn't flat even to the point that it was taught in schools. I do believe it is possible, just not with our current knowledge. It may be possible in the future. Infact, with the rate we're going with Science, I wouldn't be surprised if we were taking teleportation for granted in 100 years. [View Quote] bowenAug 9, 2002, 12:35am
[View Quote]
Is Columbus still sailing for the English? :)
> I do believe it is possible, just not with our current knowledge. It may be > possible in the future. Infact, with the rate we're going with Science, I > wouldn't be surprised if we were taking teleportation for granted in 100 > years. Doubtfully, it's not on the top of the physicist's list of things to do. FTL tech is higher up. --Bowen-- lioness.Aug 9, 2002, 4:23am
ncc 72897Aug 9, 2002, 6:34am
so?? most of the science used there is based on real science
as it already has been said matter transport is not impossible anti-matter has been produced already in small quantities as well, warp drives and those wepons technologies used in ST are based on real science as well.. so u cant say any of this isnt possible [View Quote] bowenAug 9, 2002, 3:14pm
> so?? most of the science used there is based on real science
Tell me which science the cloak is based off of. Or maybe the subspace beacons. :P > as it already has been said matter transport is not impossible > anti-matter has been produced already in small quantities as well, > warp drives and those wepons technologies used in ST are based on real > science as well.. > so u cant say any of this isnt possible Well, the warp drive is based off a matter anti-matter reaction right? Firstly, we can't produce enough anti-matter to propel a space ship. Second we can't get anywhere near the speed of light. Third, we can't enter subspace to avoid hitting dust particles that would rip the ship to shreds. --Bowen-- |