|
AW TV Stations (Community)
AW TV Stations // Community
May 6, 2005, 2:48am
I'm looking for some urls to some active television stations. Assuming
there are any, of course. :) I need four of them, and if you guys know of
any, please post their urls here. Thanks!
Chris
May 6, 2005, 12:52pm
http://vmist.net/ptv/tv.php
-=LtB=-
[View Quote]"SW Chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:427ae8fd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm looking for some urls to some active television stations. Assuming
> there are any, of course. :) I need four of them, and if you guys know
> of any, please post their urls here. Thanks!
>
> Chris
>
|
May 8, 2005, 3:56am
These I have collected SW Chris. Found all by searching google one night.
Speaking of which many of the owners of them rarely keep them up. Some good
/some not. I think some of these owners don't keep their ISP'S paid is what
the problem is. I have been watching them for a very long time. Some have
not changed the content on them months..even years. Basically some of them
are a total waste of cell space. lol. I have been toying with cam url's
instead lately. HF
create picture cd-dm.org/cbrn.php update=20
create picture dsbn.uni.cc/dsbn.php update=20
create picture abn.ablivion.net/tv.jpg update=20
create picture aawr.net/uetv.php update=20
create picture windmillent.com/fbstv.php update=20
create picture ksgtv.vmist.net/tv.php update=20
create picture ksgtv.vmist.net/live.php update=20
create picture vmist.net/ptv/tv.php update=20
create picture tv.vwtv.org/ update=20
NON AW
NASA> create picture
science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/countdown/video/chan2large.jpg update=20
May 8, 2005, 11:23pm
iNuma TV is now online
create picture http://inuma.awradio.com/media/inuma.php update=10
although we only have the logos on at the moment, we are filming a telemovie
as we speak
[View Quote]"SW Chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:427ae8fd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm looking for some urls to some active television stations. Assuming
> there are any, of course. :) I need four of them, and if you guys know
> of any, please post their urls here. Thanks!
>
> Chris
>
|
May 10, 2005, 8:50pm
create picture gsn.vmist.net/tv.php update=10
[View Quote]"HighFlier" <highflier at awgate.com> wrote in message
news:427d9bf6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> These I have collected SW Chris. Found all by searching google one night.
> Speaking of which many of the owners of them rarely keep them up. Some
> good /some not. I think some of these owners don't keep their ISP'S paid
> is what the problem is. I have been watching them for a very long time.
> Some have not changed the content on them months..even years. Basically
> some of them are a total waste of cell space. lol. I have been toying with
> cam url's instead lately. HF
>
> create picture cd-dm.org/cbrn.php update=20
> create picture dsbn.uni.cc/dsbn.php update=20
> create picture abn.ablivion.net/tv.jpg update=20
> create picture aawr.net/uetv.php update=20
> create picture windmillent.com/fbstv.php update=20
> create picture ksgtv.vmist.net/tv.php update=20
> create picture ksgtv.vmist.net/live.php update=20
> create picture vmist.net/ptv/tv.php update=20
> create picture tv.vwtv.org/ update=20
>
> NON AW
>
> NASA> create picture
> science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/countdown/video/chan2large.jpg update=20
>
|
May 11, 2005, 11:30pm
A great way to tell a tv station is n00b, they dont use square 256x256
images or of another size which AW renders quite well, and havent learnt the
some other shapes n sizes can be completely unreadable.
[View Quote]"Agent Meh" <mrmeh at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:427ead74 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> iNuma TV is now online
>
> create picture http://inuma.awradio.com/media/inuma.php update=10
>
> although we only have the logos on at the moment, we are filming a
> telemovie as we speak
>
>
> "SW Chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:427ae8fd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 1:21am
Dont forget the Unknown Great GCTV - create picture
http://gc.ablivion.net/tv.jpg update=10
Thanks
-gc
[View Quote]"R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:4282a3b2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> A great way to tell a tv station is n00b, they dont use square 256x256
> images or of another size which AW renders quite well, and havent learnt
the
> some other shapes n sizes can be completely unreadable.
>
>
> "Agent Meh" <mrmeh at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
> news:427ead74 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
know
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 1:33am
Well said Richard ^_^ Can't read any of that me.
[View Quote]"GC" <will2003 at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4282bda4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Dont forget the Unknown Great GCTV - create picture
> http://gc.ablivion.net/tv.jpg update=10
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -gc
>
>
> "R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:4282a3b2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
> know
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 2:01pm
you all keep saying 'tv station' 'tv station' but correct me if I am wrong,
since it is a long long time since I watched, TV but didn't TV have 'moving
pictures'.
Sorry people but all of your 'TV stations' are a farce. Simple pictures
flashed one after another telling a story is NOT television, especially with
the new feature of media streaming which could make a 'TV station' worth
maybe looking at.
sweets
[View Quote]"GC" <will2003 at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4282bda4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Dont forget the Unknown Great GCTV - create picture
> http://gc.ablivion.net/tv.jpg update=10
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -gc
>
>
> "R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:4282a3b2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
> know
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 2:49pm
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> you all keep saying 'tv station' 'tv station' but correct me if I am wrong,
> since it is a long long time since I watched, TV but didn't TV have 'moving
> pictures'.
> Sorry people but all of your 'TV stations' are a farce. Simple pictures
> flashed one after another telling a story is NOT television, especially with
> the new feature of media streaming which could make a 'TV station' worth
> maybe looking at.
> sweets
|
You're wrong. Motion pictures are nothing more than a bunch of images
stuck together to form motion, hence the name. The black lines
surrounding them tell our eyes "hey this is a new frame". They are
exactly like what the TV stations were, except in AW they're much, much
slower than what they are in real life. The faster the images are
presented, the more fluid the motion. But if you take a film and slow
it down to 2 frames a second, you'd get pretty much the same thing you
see in AW.
Try it, get an old projector and slow it down.
May 12, 2005, 4:45pm
As discussed before, the Streaming media feature in AW is very basic.
Streaming media Television just can't be done for AW, as lack of
playlist support means we're forced to upload large loops of video with
adverts and shows pieced together.
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> you all keep saying 'tv station' 'tv station' but correct me if I am wrong,
> since it is a long long time since I watched, TV but didn't TV have 'moving
> pictures'.
> Sorry people but all of your 'TV stations' are a farce. Simple pictures
> flashed one after another telling a story is NOT television, especially with
> the new feature of media streaming which could make a 'TV station' worth
> maybe looking at.
> sweets
|
May 12, 2005, 4:58pm
I am right, you are right....it is pictures...but they flow in constant
motion which is called cinema or television....get real....that is not
Television....that is a photo album....
all that aside, you being picky that is, you DO know what I mean. This is a
cheap, very cheap and useless, imitation.
sweets
[View Quote]"Outsider" <outsider at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42837af7$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sweets wrote:
>
> You're wrong. Motion pictures are nothing more than a bunch of images
> stuck together to form motion, hence the name. The black lines
> surrounding them tell our eyes "hey this is a new frame". They are
> exactly like what the TV stations were, except in AW they're much, much
> slower than what they are in real life. The faster the images are
> presented, the more fluid the motion. But if you take a film and slow it
> down to 2 frames a second, you'd get pretty much the same thing you see in
> AW.
>
> Try it, get an old projector and slow it down.
|
May 12, 2005, 5:28pm
Sweets... how can I be put this...
Deal with it.
--
- Mark Randall
http://zetech.swehli.com
[View Quote]"sweets" <stylecanin at videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:42836fcc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you all keep saying 'tv station' 'tv station' but correct me if I am
> wrong, since it is a long long time since I watched, TV but didn't TV have
> 'moving pictures'.
> Sorry people but all of your 'TV stations' are a farce. Simple pictures
> flashed one after another telling a story is NOT television, especially
> with the new feature of media streaming which could make a 'TV station'
> worth maybe looking at.
> sweets
> "GC" <will2003 at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:4282bda4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 5:34pm
LMAO Strike I did deal with it....was pretty excited that someone maybe was
doing tv....I dealt with it by putting my disappointment back in the drawer,
closing the webs, and marking it down as another AW failure.
with Cams, streaming media, and a bit of time and imagination, I figured
someone by now could have figured out something better than choppy pictures,
no sound, no movement, bad quality pictures, etc etc....
I dealt with it, will no longer bother to look at any so called TV at AW
till someone has a brain to figure it out, properly.
If these were done by a 7 year old, then I congratulate you all....but if
these were done by people claiming 'experience, smarts, computer ability,
and skill" then I say *you failed, miserably*
sweets
[View Quote]"Strike Rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4283a051 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sweets... how can I be put this...
>
> Deal with it.
>
> --
> - Mark Randall
> http://zetech.swehli.com
>
> "sweets" <stylecanin at videotron.ca> wrote in message
> news:42836fcc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 5:35pm
The terminology of a "television station" is used because that's what it
most closely resembles. No more. No less.
Chris
[View Quote]"sweets" <stylecanin at videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:42839930$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>I am right, you are right....it is pictures...but they flow in constant
>motion which is called cinema or television....get real....that is not
>Television....that is a photo album....
>
> all that aside, you being picky that is, you DO know what I mean. This is
> a cheap, very cheap and useless, imitation.
> sweets
>
> "Outsider" <outsider at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:42837af7$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 5:45pm
So there will be no further interruption / complaining over a perfectly
harmless post then?? ;P
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> I dealt with it, will no longer bother to look at any so called TV at AW
> till someone has a brain to figure it out, properly.
|
May 12, 2005, 5:52pm
Elyk............two words....first one begins with F....second is You
have a nice day
sweets
[View Quote]"Elyk" <kfoerst at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:4283a458 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So there will be no further interruption / complaining over a perfectly
> harmless post then?? ;P
>
> sweets wrote:
|
May 12, 2005, 6:03pm
Actually the first "so called TV now" was an esperiment Doc1 was doing back in
99 in AWSchool. ...And Doc was in hes 40s by then..........rotfl:)
[View Quote]
> Elyk............two words....first one begins with F....second is You
> have a nice day
> sweets
>
[View Quote]> "Elyk" <kfoerst at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4283a458 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
May 12, 2005, 6:20pm
LOL
all I'm saying is, if you don't like the tv stations or filmstrips they
do, don't bother watching or dealing with them. There are a few things
that I don't like in AW and I don't pay them any attention. Odd how
Strike always says the worst in a thread and somehow in this one I get
the big "F-you" lol ;)
[View Quote]
> Elyk............two words....first one begins with F....second is You
> have a nice day
> sweets
>
[View Quote]> "Elyk" <kfoerst at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4283a458 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
May 12, 2005, 6:44pm
[View Quote]"Elyk" <kfoerst at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:4283ac6a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Strike always says the worst in a thread
...
|
But.. but.. im an angel :O
--
- Mark Randall
http://zetech.swehli.com
May 12, 2005, 6:53pm
Its called working with what we have
Smarts? We used them, and we did not fail miserably, as we came up with
the smart solution of frame by frame.
The problem with you is that you expect the best, although im suprised
your not complaining about the basicness of Active worlds
What do you suggest then?
Before you say Video, Read my other post
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> LMAO Strike I did deal with it....was pretty excited that someone maybe was
> doing tv....I dealt with it by putting my disappointment back in the drawer,
> closing the webs, and marking it down as another AW failure.
> with Cams, streaming media, and a bit of time and imagination, I figured
> someone by now could have figured out something better than choppy pictures,
> no sound, no movement, bad quality pictures, etc etc....
> I dealt with it, will no longer bother to look at any so called TV at AW
> till someone has a brain to figure it out, properly.
> If these were done by a 7 year old, then I congratulate you all....but if
> these were done by people claiming 'experience, smarts, computer ability,
> and skill" then I say *you failed, miserably*
> sweets
|
May 12, 2005, 7:58pm
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> I am right, you are right....it is pictures...but they flow in constant
> motion which is called cinema or television....get real....that is not
> Television....that is a photo album....
>
> all that aside, you being picky that is, you DO know what I mean. This is a
> cheap, very cheap and useless, imitation.
> sweets
|
Try again. Cinema and/or television is basically a "photo album" as you
so eloquently put it. The TV stations in AW flow in a constant motion,
it's just quite a bit slower. If I take, let's say, Blade, and slow it
down to 3 frames per second and link it to an image, and then throw it
on a TV object with an update=3, then it works just the same. It's just
slow motion picture.
May 12, 2005, 8:22pm
pictures....yes pictures.....
then call it a comic strip....on a television....that is what it is....comic
strips....not continuous motion....
end of discussion....end of thread....take my so called complaints and do
something with it....if you can....
subject closed
sweets
[View Quote]"Outsider" <outsider at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4283c35b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sweets wrote:
>
> Try again. Cinema and/or television is basically a "photo album" as you
> so eloquently put it. The TV stations in AW flow in a constant motion,
> it's just quite a bit slower. If I take, let's say, Blade, and slow it
> down to 3 frames per second and link it to an image, and then throw it on
> a TV object with an update=3, then it works just the same. It's just slow
> motion picture.
|
May 12, 2005, 8:32pm
yeah I do expect the best....and know it could be better...much
better....even an amateur like me can see this.
this 'method' is over 6 years old...animated strips, flash player material.
this is not 'new' or even interesting.
you may take it as complaints, but maybe you should take it as constructive
critisism. Which critisism can cause new ideas to form. Maybe this time a
good idea. Anyone out there get a twinge of an idea? I hope so
I wish you all luck with your TV's (grunts) and hope in the future someone
can see the logic of my complaints and ideas and give us what we do expect
in AW....something exciting, new and groundbreaking
sweets
[View Quote]"Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
news:4283b424$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Its called working with what we have
> Smarts? We used them, and we did not fail miserably, as we came up with
> the smart solution of frame by frame.
> The problem with you is that you expect the best, although im suprised
> your not complaining about the basicness of Active worlds
> What do you suggest then?
> Before you say Video, Read my other post
> sweets wrote:
|
May 12, 2005, 8:40pm
Becareful when you pick ignorance over common sense
Whats with the recent flood of posh "Tend to my needs im the best"
people here?
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> yeah I do expect the best....and know it could be better...much
> better....even an amateur like me can see this.
> this 'method' is over 6 years old...animated strips, flash player material.
> this is not 'new' or even interesting.
> you may take it as complaints, but maybe you should take it as constructive
> critisism. Which critisism can cause new ideas to form. Maybe this time a
> good idea. Anyone out there get a twinge of an idea? I hope so
> I wish you all luck with your TV's (grunts) and hope in the future someone
> can see the logic of my complaints and ideas and give us what we do expect
> in AW....something exciting, new and groundbreaking
> sweets
|
May 12, 2005, 9:05pm
Hey Strike you still working on that TV Viewer program? If so I;d like to
have it with all these new stations on it..
lol
-gc - 296894
GCTV - http://gc.ablivion.net/gctv
[View Quote]"Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
news:4283cd41$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Becareful when you pick ignorance over common sense
> Whats with the recent flood of posh "Tend to my needs im the best"
> people here?
>
> sweets wrote:
material.
constructive
a
someone
expect
|
May 12, 2005, 9:16pm
Talk about pulling an Alin Steglinski on me X_X
[View Quote]GC wrote:
> Hey Strike you still working on that TV Viewer program? If so I;d like to
> have it with all these new stations on it..
> lol
>
>
> -gc - 296894
> GCTV - http://gc.ablivion.net/gctv
>
|
>
May 12, 2005, 9:29pm
If you can't take the heat -- stay out of the kitchen :P You were the
one who brought up the subject to them sweets lol. Outsider was just
explaining it. Until they CAN find a way to work on actual movies of
citizens in AW, that's all we got.. I think VWTV and the rest of them
are doing a good job (at least they are trying right?) If you don't
like the movies that are made that way, why don't you see if you can
make better ones? There is a first for every creation in AW.
[View Quote]sweets wrote:
> end of discussion....end of thread....take my so called complaints and do
> something with it....if you can....
> subject closed
> sweets
|
May 13, 2005, 12:29am
thats were servers come in. nothing supports playlists on a normal webhost,
unless you plan to use some sorta script which directs you to diffrent
files, which in that case, can be used in AW too.
what i'm trying to say is that is isn't AW that is basic, but it is limited
by the streaming video logic...
can't have a station without a media server, just like you wouldn't be ale
to have a website without a webserver.
-SWE
[View Quote]"Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
news:4283962a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> As discussed before, the Streaming media feature in AW is very basic.
> Streaming media Television just can't be done for AW, as lack of playlist
> support means we're forced to upload large loops of video with adverts and
> shows pieced together.
>
|
May 13, 2005, 12:32am
No need to get technical really. and you know what she's talking about.
what about sound then? jpgs being changed at 0.1fps cannot be considered
video....
-SWE
[View Quote]"Outsider" <outsider at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42837af7$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> You're wrong. Motion pictures are nothing more than a bunch of images
> stuck together to form motion, hence the name. The black lines
> surrounding them tell our eyes "hey this is a new frame". They are
> exactly like what the TV stations were, except in AW they're much, much
> slower than what they are in real life. The faster the images are
> presented, the more fluid the motion. But if you take a film and slow it
> down to 2 frames a second, you'd get pretty much the same thing you see in
> AW.
>
> Try it, get an old projector and slow it down.
|
|