|
they crossed the line. (Community)
they crossed the line. // Community
Jun 30, 2003, 2:54pm
The gate is the most crowded world. Its the only place you can really find
anyone new to have a conversation with.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f00592f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this is easy to solve Iggy.....if you don;'t like it don't go to the
Gate....stay away from there...you obviously do not need help with AW...and
your not there to help others...why do you go there?
>
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB262FAB.8AA%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
friends
could
after
them
bud.
when you
all
at the
few
Sorry to
like,
kellie
at the
lives
gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 2:57pm
You tend to be nasty, but your buddy-buddy with the GKs so they don't do
anything about it.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f0052d0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You, also, have toublemaking tendencies and should avoid the gate at all
times....you do not like authority figures..I've seen you in action at the
gate......:)
>
> There you have it.....no charge for the assessment.
> Leo :)
>
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f0050ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Sorry to
like,
kellie
the
lives
gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:00pm
Right, and the GKs should've stopped the person harrassing iggy. That's
iggy's point! Iggy probably does not harrass people or start debates, which
is why he is debating HERE. Iggy said he (or she) goes there to chat, and
never even said the she (or he) unsettles the atmosphere. Being ignored is
no reason to eject someone! That's the worst justification I've EVER heard.
Why not buck the system? If no one bucked the system, then we'd all be
opressed, and there would still be all kinds of horrible things like racism
and no free speech. Conforming is the worst thing you can ever do, so why
don't you buck the system once in a while?
The reason you refuse to believe iggy is because you know he (or she) is NOT
lying, but your friends with a lot of the GKs so you don't WANT to believe
about them.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f005c34$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I know that..... but the GATE is not for you to harass people nor
start debates. Go there if you want to help people.....or lurk.....but not
to unsettle the atmosphere.
>
> An if your chat post was in fact all the chat...then, no, it does not look
like they were justified for ejecting you for sure....but ....you muted the
gatekeeper...so you do not have a leg to stand on.....If i was in charge of
an area(AW or not) and I was being ignored you'd get ejected also..:)
Don't buck the system so much.
>
> I'm not arguing that there are bad GK's just that I do not think your a
good example either.
>
> Leo :)
>
> Sorry if I smile a lot I'm just that way in real life to ... I always
smile even in a good fight..:) keeps 'em off guard..:)
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB2633BC.8B5%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
AW...and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:07pm
..duo., Your about as wrong as I was when I first read this...:) I'd be the first one to scream bloody murder on a bad GK...in fact I've about had it with the GK Management......they leave the GK's out to dry way to many times. and are actually the reason the organization is faltering...IMO. I buck the system when it needs it.....but not at others expense. IMO Iggy should have left the Gate when he did not like what Vermin was saying, not sit there and make an issue out of it. Email is your friend and it's a "paper trail" when you need it.
Leo
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f006cb1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Right, and the GKs should've stopped the person harrassing iggy. That's
> iggy's point! Iggy probably does not harrass people or start debates, which
> is why he is debating HERE. Iggy said he (or she) goes there to chat, and
> never even said the she (or he) unsettles the atmosphere. Being ignored is
> no reason to eject someone! That's the worst justification I've EVER heard.
> Why not buck the system? If no one bucked the system, then we'd all be
> opressed, and there would still be all kinds of horrible things like racism
> and no free speech. Conforming is the worst thing you can ever do, so why
> don't you buck the system once in a while?
>
> The reason you refuse to believe iggy is because you know he (or she) is NOT
> lying, but your friends with a lot of the GKs so you don't WANT to believe
> about them.
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f005c34$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> start debates. Go there if you want to help people.....or lurk.....but not
> to unsettle the atmosphere.
> like they were justified for ejecting you for sure....but ....you muted the
> gatekeeper...so you do not have a leg to stand on.....If i was in charge of
> an area(AW or not) and I was being ignored you'd get ejected also..:)
> Don't buck the system so much.
> good example either.
> smile even in a good fight..:) keeps 'em off guard..:)
> news:BB2633BC.8B5%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> AW...and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:08pm
Simple. Ignorign is not against any rule, so they have NO right to eject
iggy. Simple as that. The GKs being in charge isn't a rule. AW could shut
them down if they wanted, and put someone else in charge, it isn't definate.
The GKs are in charge to keep order, even if they don't always do the best
job. They aren't there to eject people because they dislike them. In fact I
remember hearing that GKs aren't ALOUD to do anything to someone because
they wronged a GK. YOU want people in charge who are corrupt and don't eject
YOU because their your friends, and YOU have no feeling, understanding, or
sympathy for anyone who is NOT friends with the GKs. Technically Iggy or I
would probably make better GKs because we don't wrong people like that. The
gate might be a little disorderly, but sometimes people feeling comfortable
is more important.
STOP BEING NASTY, IT HURTS PEOPLE'S FEELINGS!!! I think I've had it with
your posts, if you continue beign a jerk I'll ask enzo to tell you to be
nicer or delete your posts since you REFUSE to be kind.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f005222 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you muted them how the hell can you complain about their behavior?
How do you know they did not eject you after trying to communicate with you,
and you kept "ignoring" them? Ya know one basic rule at the Gate you
seem to over look....The GK's are in charge whether you like it or not.
And it has to be that way. WHY? Because we don't want people like YOU in
charge. :)
>
> Leo :)
>
>
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB26260C.89B%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
And i
Gate..:)
Active
Setting
reducing your
Guidelines
Guidelines
tabacco
revolution.
it out
jew
the
again?
and
an
starts
click on
starts
it
the
some
right you
............{{{{{{{{{{{{{Nutski}}}}}}}}}}} :}
rights....what do u
when ppl
Sorry to
like,
productive
kellie
the
saying
lives of
gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:11pm
I'll start by saying that your post completely ignores all my points, and
that I shouldn't respond to it, but I will.
All the time I'm there. Whenever someone is there while I'm chatting, I'll
help them. For example, this morning a tourist needed a seed object
somewhere in AWTeen. I went out of my way to make it for them. How many GKs
do you know would do that?
How many hours a day do GKs spend at the gate hurting people? Doing an
insufficient job? Being unfair?
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f0058b5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ok....how many HOURS a day do you spend at the gate helping people?
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f005446$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
there.
iggy
chat
that
legitimate.
are
claims.
reason
Gate..:)
in
Setting
reducing
for it
jew
the
and
an
starts
it
the
right
............{{{{{{{{{{{{{Nutski}}}}}}}}}}}
rights....what
when
kellie
at
for
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:12pm
Me too, and that's a lot of the time.
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB2632CE.8AF%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article 3f0058b5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
> leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 6:35 PM:
>
> i am not a GK
> i am helpfull when i feel like beeing helpfull.
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:19pm
I'm only nasty when I need to be.....don't harass me and the people I'm with and you won't see me nasty...:)
Look at my freak'in name dude.....I'm everyone's "Bud"....at least that's how I start out....unless you piss on me then I piss on you...:)
And BTW I read every word of your post and pondered it fairly...:)
Leo
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f006beb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You tend to be nasty, but your buddy-buddy with the GKs so they don't do
> anything about it.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f0052d0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> times....you do not like authority figures..I've seen you in action at the
> gate......:)
> news:3f0050ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry to
> like,
> kellie
> the
> lives
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:37pm
..duo. bite me hows that for nasty.......<BB unloads another truck full of fense post for Duo to argue with.>
I've had it with your lame ass post's also....learn to conform (thats how society works) if you have a complaint, lodge it through the proper channels........do not go to the gate and harass gatekeepers....thats not how it works.....if you don;t like being ejected then don;'t do ejectable things at the gate...;) very simple... sorry you can't understand that.
OH and please name all the Gatekeepers I am close friends with....:) Please..... I await your response to this.
Leo :)
[View Quote]".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message news:3f006e9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Simple. Ignorign is not against any rule, so they have NO right to eject
> iggy. Simple as that. The GKs being in charge isn't a rule. AW could shut
> them down if they wanted, and put someone else in charge, it isn't definate.
> The GKs are in charge to keep order, even if they don't always do the best
> job. They aren't there to eject people because they dislike them. In fact I
> remember hearing that GKs aren't ALOUD to do anything to someone because
> they wronged a GK. YOU want people in charge who are corrupt and don't eject
> YOU because their your friends, and YOU have no feeling, understanding, or
> sympathy for anyone who is NOT friends with the GKs. Technically Iggy or I
> would probably make better GKs because we don't wrong people like that. The
> gate might be a little disorderly, but sometimes people feeling comfortable
> is more important.
>
> STOP BEING NASTY, IT HURTS PEOPLE'S FEELINGS!!! I think I've had it with
> your posts, if you continue beign a jerk I'll ask enzo to tell you to be
> nicer or delete your posts since you REFUSE to be kind.
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f005222 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> How do you know they did not eject you after trying to communicate with you,
> and you kept "ignoring" them? Ya know one basic rule at the Gate you
> seem to over look....The GK's are in charge whether you like it or not.
> And it has to be that way. WHY? Because we don't want people like YOU in
> charge. :)
> news:BB26260C.89B%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> And i
> Gate..:)
> Active
> Setting
> reducing your
> Guidelines
> Guidelines
> tabacco
> revolution.
> it out
> jew
> the
> again?
> and
> an
> starts
> click on
> starts
> it
> the
> some
> right you
> ...........{{{{{{{{{{{{{Nutski}}}}}}}}}}} :}
> rights....what do u
> when ppl
> Sorry to
> like,
> productive
> kellie
> the
> saying
> lives of
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:43pm
High Dysfunction, actually that's a very accurate observation.
But then I've had people talk to me that refer to gate ejection as causing
suicide attacks. I think that has its problems too.
Yesterday, two avatars at the gate were, well, they were in a position and
describing a position not fit for the gate, which, I knew was going to
happen sometime, just didn't know when. Odd thing is there are people there
watching all this that seem to have more interest in wanting to see what the
reaction is of everyone else, therefore, they purposely don't speak up and
say anything. What do you call those people? And, why don't they speak up?
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> Hullo!
> After 4 years in AW i have decided not to pay anymore.
> the gate, Gatekeepers, double standards and Holocaust denial:
> As AW is shrinking, i found myself more and more at AWGate,
> which in some hours is the only place you can chat in english,
> not in a Ds or Gor world and without gaining ex. points.
> After 3 years i found out there are Gatekeepers in AW,
> and the sight was very unpleasant.
> In my opinion, most of those people are a huge disfunction.
> Most of them use the guidelines only to pick on people they don't like,
> While they let their friends say and do whatever they want.
> I tried to contact gatekeepers at activeworlds.com and didn't got a
productive
> answer,
> then i contact the management which chose to pass my emails to kellie
which,
> again,
> did nothing productive.
> The limit was crossed when Vermin2 was justifying Hitler's deeds at the
> gate, without any respond from the Gatekeeper,
> Tigger GK, who was aware enough of what's going on to eject me for saying
> the GK's made a sport from ejecting me.
> I guess that Tigger's ego is far much a delicate matter than the lives of
> the millions who died in WW2.
>
> P.S : I am still waiting for an answer from gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
and
> kellie about Tigger's behavior that day.
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 3:52pm
Re: they crossed the line.I guess I missing the place in the chat where
someone is trying to justify the actions of Hitler. Talking about history do
not make anyone a nazi. Many people talk about other murderers like Stalin,
Bush , Sharon and Gadaffi also without beeing ejected, I do not see why
Hitler would be moore of a taboo.
Drac
iggythealleycat <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:BB2618B2.896%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
in article 3f003179$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 3:47 PM:
here is the log:
<snip>
Jun 30, 2003, 4:54pm
Vermin committed no crime other than expressing his opinion. If you are such an anti-fascist, proud American, then you might recall a teansie little article in the Bill of Rights that allows American citizens to speak out against the government without fear of federal persecution. Just because you don't like to hear what he has to say doesn't mean that he doesn't have the same rights and privileges that you do. If you want to silence him, then you're not much better than Joseph Goebbels.
That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not necessarily apply in AW. According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing wrong, though. There was no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you were the sole opposition of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing, and no insulting. Seeing that no one else apparently had a problem with this, you should have muted him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid) and gone along your merry way. If someone's opinions expressed over the Internet can get to you that easily, then you seriously need to learn to have faith in your own beliefs.
[View Quote]iggythealleycat wrote:
> here is the log:
>
> Immigration Officer: Welcome to the AWGate. Much of the content in Active
> Worlds is user generated & may not be appropriate for all users. Setting
> your browser rating level can improve your enjoyment of AW by reducing your
> exposure to offensive content. Enjoy your stay :)
> [Customs Aide]: Welcome, IggyTheAlleayCat. For the Conduct Guidelines
> please say World Rules or see
> http://www.activeworlds.com/community/conduct.asp
> [Customs Aide]: Welcome, IggyTheAlleayCat. For the Conduct Guidelines
> please say World Rules or see
> http://www.activeworlds.com/community/conduct.asp
> Bowen: instead of those that want to cause problems, like pay off tabacco
> and oil industries
> Amunition121: hi ppl
> "Minoataur78": nah, tallahasee
> "LeglizHemp": hi 121
> Moron.: hi Amnu
> Moron.: <---missed again...grrrrr
> "Vermin2": No, that Jew Russian Lenin who led the Bolshivick revolution.
> Tigger GK: Hi amun
> Nevik: Better idea is , if they want to make a law, let em pay for it out
> of their OWN pocket
> "LeglizHemp": john lennon was a russian?
> Moron.: lol Leg
> 000: 1918 lenin
> Bowen: yeah I like that idea Nevik ;)
> "Weird": Tigger
> IggyTheAlleayCat: no leglized only commnist
> "Vermin2": Kinda funny huh, I bet you didn't know Hitler was half jew
> either.
> Bowen: but then it has to be approved by the public ;)
> "LeglizHemp": darn and i always thought he was from liverpool
> Bowen: who didn't know Hitler was jewish?
> "Weird": Are you an experienced builder
> IggyTheAlleayCat: tigger now you allow a nazi chat ?!
> 000: no he was a chirstian
> Bowen: it's fine, it's certainly within G limits iggy
> "Weird": what do i type in the action box to make when I click on the
> object, the midi stops playing, click on it again, it starts playing again?
> "LeglizHemp": nazi are easy to tease
> Moron.: lol
> "Vermin2": No he was a fool who attached onto an idea.
> "Kevin": GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!
> IggyTheAlleayCat: vermin quit that ok take it to aw debate
> "Weird": Can you help me tigger
> Julionna K: *looks to Kevi and sees him growling and giggles*
> "Vermin2": And people followed him because they were weak of mind and
> soul.
> Moron.: lol Juli
> IggyTheAlleayCat: vermin cut that
> "LeglizHemp": i am weak of mind....lead me......LOL
> "Weird": what do i type in the action box to make when I click on an
> object with a midi, the midi stops playing, click on it again, it starts
> playing again?
> Moron.: <--weak of mind....lol
> "Vermin2": I appologize, I love being, my own man.
> Julionna K: hehe
> "Weird": TIGGER! what do i type in the action box to make when I click on
> an object with a midi, the midi stops playing, click on it again, it starts
> playing again?
> "LeglizHemp": my head sounds like a spray paint can when i shake it
> "Vermin2": But then?
> NuttyRedHead: hello everyone :)
> Moron.: <---listening to leg's Head..........
> Julionna K: *mutes herself*
> Julionna K: oppppps
> "LeglizHemp": LOL
> Moron.: hi Nutty
> IggyTheAlleayCat: (to "Vermin2") vermin,all my moms family got to the
> ovens but her parnts and two aunts please cut it
> "Weird": darn
> NuttyRedHead: hiya Tigger and Moron :)
> Julionna K: hello NRH
> "Vermin2": I refuse to loose my Constitutional right just because some
> beaurocrat says so.
> NuttyRedHead: hi Julionna :)
> IggyTheAlleayCat: thank you vermin
> Moron.: at least you have somthing in there Leg.....lol
> "LeglizHemp": bummer tigger you missing great tune right now
> IggyTheAlleayCat: when you log to AW you have no continutional right you
> have guidelines
> Nevik: Mornin Nutty, Nutty? ...........{{{{{{{{{{{{{Nutski}}}}}}}}}}} :}
> "LeglizHemp": floyd........echos
> "Vermin2": Iggy, you have a mandate to stand up.
> "LeglizHemp": awesum
> Onexpresso: gee those nose landings
> Onexpresso: hello Iggy
> NuttyRedHead: hehehe (((((((((Nev)))))))))))
> Moron.: wb One
> 000: yeh bill of right onlt apply to gov
> Nevik: Hi One :}
> "Vermin2": I want my rights back.
> Onexpresso: Greetings Honorable Tigger
> 000: sould be a corp bill of rights
> Julionna K: *ventures off and goes waundering about*
> Moron.: <--of all the things i've lost, i miss my mind the
> most.......sigh
> "LeglizHemp": i think there should be a moron bill of rights....what do u
> think moron?
> "Kevin": Yikes
> Nevik: Bill of rights? hes retired , but Hillary is still around
> "Vermin2": Send the message through the land, but not Washington.
> "Kevin": *Hides*
> Moron.: <---agrees with Leg
> NuttyRedHead: (((((((Kevin))))))))
> Moron.: dont go to far Juli.......lol
> "LeglizHemp": we have the right to be stupid and oblivious
> "Kevin": ((((((((((((((NRH))))))))))))))
> Onexpresso: Hello Red
> Onexpresso: hugs 2u
> NuttyRedHead: hiya Onex :)
> "Vermin2": Them willy wakers that set on tall chairs.
> Moron.: 3 cheers for Leg
> Nevik: Time ta go ta work.... later all :}
> Julionna K: *leaps into the water and swims across*
> Moron.: later Nevik
> NuttyRedHead: Tigger, has Mr Barton been in yet thismorning?
> Nevik: adidas, Hostile ole banana
> "LeglizHemp": lol moron we should work on that bill of rights
> sometime.......lol
> Moron.: <--hasnt seen him Nutty
> NuttyRedHead: have a good one Nev ;)
> NuttyRedHead: ok, thank you Moron and Tigger :)
> "Vermin2": Now cool it down.
> Moron.: yes we should Leg.....lol
> Moron.: <---looking for pencil..........
> Moron.: nite Tigger
> NuttyRedHead: take care Tigger :)
> Moron.: you ok Juli??
> "Vermin2": We need time to read the CONSTITUTION.
> "LeglizHemp": nite tigger....don't bend your tail
> IggyTheAlleayCat: those GK's made a sport from ejecting me even when ppl
> stalk me I am the one thtat get ejected :/
> "Kevin": LOL
> "LeglizHemp": lol
> Moron.: you sure, the Ackkk sounded bad.....lol
> "Vermin2": Do you think you can do it?
> "LeglizHemp": or both tigs?
> Immigration Officer: You have been ejected from awgate
|
Jun 30, 2003, 6:45pm
I committed suicide after being ejected from AWGate, now I am but a lonely
ghost wandering the internet.
:D
U 4 real?
[View Quote]"the lady" <thelady263414 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f0076b6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> High Dysfunction, actually that's a very accurate observation.
>
> But then I've had people talk to me that refer to gate ejection as causing
> suicide attacks. I think that has its problems too.
>
> Yesterday, two avatars at the gate were, well, they were in a position and
> describing a position not fit for the gate, which, I knew was going to
> happen sometime, just didn't know when. Odd thing is there are people
there
> watching all this that seem to have more interest in wanting to see what
the
> reaction is of everyone else, therefore, they purposely don't speak up and
> say anything. What do you call those people? And, why don't they speak
up?
>
>
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> productive
> which,
saying
of
> and
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 7:55pm
I saw somebody call gatekeepers "turd burglers" once and nothing happened to
them :-S people get ejected for small things and then when somebody does
that, nothing!
~John
[View Quote]"iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB25ED2D.5A8%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> Hullo!
> After 4 years in AW i have decided not to pay anymore.
> the gate, Gatekeepers, double standards and Holocaust denial:
> As AW is shrinking, i found myself more and more at AWGate,
> which in some hours is the only place you can chat in english,
> not in a Ds or Gor world and without gaining ex. points.
> After 3 years i found out there are Gatekeepers in AW,
> and the sight was very unpleasant.
> In my opinion, most of those people are a huge disfunction.
> Most of them use the guidelines only to pick on people they don't like,
> While they let their friends say and do whatever they want.
> I tried to contact gatekeepers at activeworlds.com and didn't got a
productive
> answer,
> then i contact the management which chose to pass my emails to kellie
which,
> again,
> did nothing productive.
> The limit was crossed when Vermin2 was justifying Hitler's deeds at the
> gate, without any respond from the Gatekeeper,
> Tigger GK, who was aware enough of what's going on to eject me for saying
> the GK's made a sport from ejecting me.
> I guess that Tigger's ego is far much a delicate matter than the lives of
> the millions who died in WW2.
>
> P.S : I am still waiting for an answer from gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
and
> kellie about Tigger's behavior that day.
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 7:57pm
He is better, he didn't want to kill Vermin :D
That may be incorrect as it is just a matter of opinion (the killing bit)
~John
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3f008754 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Vermin committed no crime other than expressing his opinion. If you are
such an anti-fascist, proud American, then you might recall a teansie little
article in the Bill of Rights that allows American citizens to speak out
against the government without fear of federal persecution. Just because you
don't like to hear what he has to say doesn't mean that he doesn't have the
same rights and privileges that you do. If you want to silence him, then
you're not much better than Joseph Goebbels.
>
> That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not
necessarily apply in AW. According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing
wrong, though. There was no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you
were the sole opposition of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing,
and no insulting. Seeing that no one else apparently had a problem with
this, you should have muted him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid)
and gone along your merry way. If someone's opinions expressed over the
Internet can get to you that easily, then you seriously need to learn to
have faith in your own beliefs.
>
> iggythealleycat wrote:
Active
your
Guidelines
Guidelines
tabacco
revolution.
out
again?
click on
starts
some
you
:}
do u
ppl
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 7:58pm
I stay away from the gate because I don't like places where I can only sit &
chat, other than that I don't mind it.
~John
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f00592f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this is easy to solve Iggy.....if you don;'t like it don't go to the
Gate....stay away from there...you obviously do not need help with AW...and
your not there to help others...why do you go there?
>
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB262FAB.8AA%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
friends
could
after
them
bud.
when you
all
at the
few
Sorry to
like,
kellie
at the
lives
gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jun 30, 2003, 8:00pm
[View Quote]count dracula wrote:
> Re: they crossed the line.I guess I missing the place in the chat where
> someone is trying to justify the actions of Hitler. Talking about history do
> not make anyone a nazi. Many people talk about other murderers like Stalin,
> Bush , Sharon and Gadaffi also without beeing ejected, I do not see why
> Hitler would be moore of a taboo.
|
No political discussions are allowed. So said the GK on duty when I was
there that night, in fact, she made it a point to say "no discussions
whatsoever" were allowed... not in those words though.
--
--Bowen--
Jun 30, 2003, 8:22pm
<snipped>
Look, since there are lack of places to chat these days. It would probably
be wise if someone could set up and maintain a register of when people are
available to come on and then people get together at AlphaWorld GZ or some
other place at pre scheduled times.
The AWGate, really in my view was primarily a place for newbies to get
accustomed to using the software, not really a place for full on chat about
anything.
And BinaryBud, Are you able to refrain from constantly feeding the flames in
these NG's... Please?
Jun 30, 2003, 8:24pm
AWCC
Activeworlds Community Council
Hmmmmm...maybe it's time it were re-instated:)
Jun 30, 2003, 8:26pm
[View Quote]lord perception wrote:
> And BinaryBud, Are you able to refrain from constantly feeding the flames in
> these NG's... Please?
|
You're an immature brat, twit, thing... and I'm older so I win.
--
--Bowen--
Jul 1, 2003, 12:04am
Once again, why should I conform? If everyone conformed and was the same,
wouldn't life be boring?
I don't harass GKs, or at leasat none have told me I do. Honestly, I love
being ejected :-P which is why I don't care.
Don't even post if you don't back up your claims. The only reason you call
my posts 'lame ass' is because they go against everything you think and
actually to some degree prove what they say.
You don't need to be close friends with GKs for them to be light on you.
Heck, there are some GKs I'm friends with and not surprisingly most of them
go easy on me.
I don't need to name any GKs your friends with. You conform, never question
authority, never speak up, and go with the flow. Why wouldn't a person of
authority like you?
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f007565$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> .duo. bite me hows that for nasty.......<BB unloads another truck
full of fense post for Duo to argue with.>
> I've had it with your lame ass post's also....learn to conform (thats how
society works) if you have a complaint, lodge it through the proper
channels........do not go to the gate and harass gatekeepers....thats not
how it works.....if you don;t like being ejected then don;'t do ejectable
things at the gate...;) very simple... sorry you can't understand that.
>
> OH and please name all the Gatekeepers I am close friends with....:)
Please..... I await your response to this.
>
> Leo :)
>
>
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f006e9c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
shut
definate.
best
fact I
eject
or
I
The
comfortable
you,
you
in
chatter...:)
content in
off
for
half
on
playing
mind
on
I
it
shake
to
because
around
Washington.
even
don't
a
deeds at
for
the
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:06am
He was insulting jewish people and not only did not stop when asked, but was
just really nasty. Nastier than I. Also, there is no indication of why iggy
was ejected, which is the whole point. Iggy was pointing out that someone
was being semi-slanderous and not being ejected while the GK was ejecting
iggy for NO apparent reason and without warning.
[View Quote]"count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
news:3f0078ee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Re: they crossed the line.I guess I missing the place in the chat where
> someone is trying to justify the actions of Hitler. Talking about history
do
> not make anyone a nazi. Many people talk about other murderers like
Stalin,
> Bush , Sharon and Gadaffi also without beeing ejected, I do not see why
> Hitler would be moore of a taboo.
>
> Drac
> iggythealleycat <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> kirjoitti
> viestissä:BB2618B2.896%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> in article 3f003179$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com, binarybud at
> leo at realPANTStourvision.com wrote on 6/30/03 3:47 PM:
>
> here is the log:
>
> <snip>
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:08am
Which is why vermin should have been ejected, and there was no reason to
eject iggy. He (or she) spoke up against GKs and that's why he was ejected,
while it is a FAR more minor thing than hinting at slandor.
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f00b2f8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> count dracula wrote:
history do
Stalin,
>
> No political discussions are allowed. So said the GK on duty when I was
> there that night, in fact, she made it a point to say "no discussions
> whatsoever" were allowed... not in those words though.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:13am
Yeah, but those constitutional rights are taken away on the internet by the
digital millenium act or whatever its called. Also, iggy is not neccesarily
a 'proud-american' but had family in the holocaust. I think thats plenty of
justification.
Vermin clearly used the word 'jew' as if it were a bad thing, and you know
it. However, I don't really think that vermin saying that hitler was half
jewish was bad at all, and in fact if anything was to make hitler look
stupid.
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3f008754 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Vermin committed no crime other than expressing his opinion. If you are
such an anti-fascist, proud American, then you might recall a teansie little
article in the Bill of Rights that allows American citizens to speak out
against the government without fear of federal persecution. Just because you
don't like to hear what he has to say doesn't mean that he doesn't have the
same rights and privileges that you do. If you want to silence him, then
you're not much better than Joseph Goebbels.
>
> That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not
necessarily apply in AW. According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing
wrong, though. There was no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you
were the sole opposition of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing,
and no insulting. Seeing that no one else apparently had a problem with
this, you should have muted him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid)
and gone along your merry way. If someone's opinions expressed over the
Internet can get to you that easily, then you seriously need to learn to
have faith in your own beliefs.
>
> iggythealleycat wrote:
Active
your
Guidelines
Guidelines
tabacco
revolution.
out
again?
click on
starts
some
you
:}
do u
ppl
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:17am
There, a good argument. The GK management may be the reason certain GKs are
bad (or have gone bad) and are still there, and that would be the cause.
However, I was just arguing that there are bad GKs, and plenty of them.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f006e66$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> .duo., Your about as wrong as I was when I first read this...:) I'd be
the first one to scream bloody murder on a bad GK...in fact I've about had
it with the GK Management......they leave the GK's out to dry way to many
times. and are actually the reason the organization is faltering...IMO.
I buck the system when it needs it.....but not at others expense. IMO Iggy
should have left the Gate when he did not like what Vermin was saying, not
sit there and make an issue out of it. Email is your friend and it's a
"paper trail" when you need it.
>
> Leo
>
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f006cb1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
which
and
is
heard.
racism
why
NOT
believe
not
look
the
of
your a
always
the
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:17am
I agree.
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3f00b27a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I stay away from the gate because I don't like places where I can only sit
&
> chat, other than that I don't mind it.
>
> ~John
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3f00592f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Gate....stay away from there...you obviously do not need help with
AW...and
> your not there to help others...why do you go there?
> news:BB262FAB.8AA%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
> friends
> could
their
> after
> them
> bud.
> when you
at
> all
> at the
a
> few
> Sorry to
don't
> like,
> kellie
> at the
for
> lives
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:19am
I agree with that statement 100%.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f0057eb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I agree with this assessment .Duo. Want to harass someone about the GK's?
Let AWI know how upset you are with the current Staff and give them NAMES.
If they see certain names being repeated in a bunch in Emails maybe they
will listen huh?
> There ARE bad apples in every bushel.....that for sure does not spoil the
whole bushel.....as long as you pick out the bad ones now and then......:)
Someone DOES need to sit around and watch them for performance.... I've seen
some pretty lame GK's that are great people but did not know first thing
about "helping" someone with a problem. It's a hard "job" to be
friendly...welcoming...supportive.... and still deal with
troublemakers.....and the bottom line is they VOLUNTEER for this...:)
>
> It's a neat "club" to be in......but they still need to have a channel for
getting rid of the bad apples a little faster. It's amazing how fast they
can get rid of a "helpful/knowledgeable" GK when they do not fit in
politically or personally with a fellow GK.....but then leave a "rotten
apple" on staff for years. and ignore there behavior/lack of service, only
cause they are well liked in the "club"....this crap has to go.
>
> My 2 cents
> Leo :)
>
> PS; I see a heck of a lot more cit's "Cross the line" than I ever do
with the GK's.
>
>
>
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f004fe4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
was
and
They
REALLY
be
better
like,
the
saying
of
gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:20am
No, but some GKs are really bad enough to eject people simply out of
dislike.
[View Quote]"binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
news:3f005cd1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "doesn't like" or "doesn't like harassed by them"
> I have MY opinion on this already duh...:)
>
>
>
>
> "iggythealleycat" <arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BB263463.8B7%arnoldlayn2005 at hotmail.com...
GK's
IS FOR
of these
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 12:20am
Yeah.
[View Quote]"weizer" <guillaume.soucis at vl.videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:3f005b4c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Afaik, not only troublemakers/rude/crude people get ejected. Just look at
> the number of posts about it.
>
> -Weizer
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 3f005a20$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> FOR NEWBIES AND THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HELP THEM"..... If your not one
of
> these people then what are you doing there?. :)
> news:3f0052fa$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> gatekeepers
> call
> de
> like,
kellie
> the
> saying
lives
> of
> gatekeepers at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 1, 2003, 1:30am
[View Quote]
> Yeah, but those constitutional rights are taken away on the internet by the
> digital millenium act or whatever its called. Also, iggy is not neccesarily
> a 'proud-american' but had family in the holocaust. I think thats plenty of
> justification.
Read before you respond, please.
"That, however, is a law planted firmly in the real world, and does not necessarily apply in AW."
(Myself, in reference to the Bill of Rights). I then go on to say that I think Vermin was not breaking the rules of discussion AWGate.
"According to the rules of AWGate, I see nothing wrong, though. There was no real debate going on (as far as I can tell you were the sole opposition of Vermin), there was no slandering, no swearing, and no insulting. Seeing that no one else apparently had a problem with this, you should have muted him (muting the GK was, quite frankly, stupid) and gone along your merry way."
> Vermin clearly used the word 'jew' as if it were a bad thing, and you know
> it. However, I don't really think that vermin saying that hitler was half
> jewish was bad at all, and in fact if anything was to make hitler look
> stupid.
Unfortunately, since I wasn't there, I *don't* know it. All I can see is that Vermin didn't seem to be bothering anybody but Iggy, which is why I advised Iggy that he should have muted the fellow and gone along his way. The GK isn't going to eject someone just because *one* person has a problem with him and he doesn't seem to be breaking any (official, as opposed to GK-on-the-spot) rules.
To rephrase: if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
|