|
silenced // User Search
silenced // User Search
Apr 17, 2002, 1:58pm
It's not our fault that your area is in a jumpy mood, fix it yourselves,
we're not your babysitters. Nor should we help you fix your own problems..
why's everyone hate the west so much but always want our help to fix things?
*cough*stop isreal US, or we'll hate you more*cough*
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbd9895 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> just thought id show this to the rest of u... dont anyone even think bout
> flaming me, cuz i warned yall bout the pictures...
>
>
>
>
> First they arrest Moh'd Saleh, a Plastinian aged 23. So far nothing is
> wrong with the picture!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Then they pin Moh'd on the floor suspecting he had bombs attached to him.
> Still nothing out of the ordinary?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> They have him on the floor still, and they try to question a second
> Plastinian on the scence. They seem to have definitly overpowerd him and
> have full control over the suitation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That's not enough? OK!! Now they have to strip him to make sure he
doesn't
> really have any bombs on him. AS we can see he is almost naked on the
> floor, (at least they had the decency to keep his underwear on), he is
> obviously overpowerd and unarmed, there is no sign of a bomb or any
> resistant. So what would a democratic country such as Isreal, a county
> which claims to respect human digintiy and life do??? Take him to prison??
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The picture speaks for itself !?!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The least you can while sitting in the comfort of your home is forward
this
> pictures to as many people as possible espically westerns so they can have
a
> glimse of what Plastinians go through!!
>
>
>
>
|
Apr 17, 2002, 2:04pm
You clearly pointed out that you wanted us to see what you go through in
order to draw our sympathy. We really can't help what you're going through,
no ammount of money or aide we send will stop either side's pointless
bickering over something so stupid as land. They'll still hate each other..
they'll still fight, they'll still do these stupid things. It's sad it
happens.. but there's nothing in this world we can do about it, go to the
people that did it, tell them to stop.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbd9c75 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> huh? im i never said its ur fault, just sharing it with yall
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbd9b93$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> problems..
> things?
> bout
is
> him.
> and
county
> prison??
> have
>
>
|
Apr 17, 2002, 2:09pm
Not you in the literal sense. You as in the Eastern area.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbd9dcb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> help me? i dont live anywghere near palestine...
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbd9d09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> through,
> other..
the
> yourselves,
think
nothing
to
second
> him
he
> the
he
> is
any
> forward
> can
>
>
|
Apr 17, 2002, 2:14pm
Libya is in the east in relation to the West. I'm not saying you're part of
the group.. just saying don't defend them if you aren't there to witness it.
As you said before, Libya is not all that bad and there's no poor people
there. So if you're not there to personally witness the Palestine/Isreal
conflict... why do you care so much?
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbd9ec5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> so? if u wroter something bout france, would i put u and france in a
group?
> as the "western area"?
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbd9e23$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
through
> in
pointless
> it
to
> fix
> attached
> overpowerd
sure
naked
> on
on),
or
a
> to
> they
>
>
|
Apr 17, 2002, 3:38pm
Ok first, your objective is one sided. You said the news channels show
different sides, but you clearly aren't viewing both sides. I don't really
care if your cousin was sadam, it's not important nor relevant to the
discussion that >YOU< are not part of it.
As for all that stuff, why do I care? You don't care about the bad things
that happen in my country thus I shouldn't care about what you think I
should care about that happens to another country. Bush and Blaire aren't
my concern either, I don't personally think my President is a very smart
person. Arafat maybe a freedom fighter in your eyes, but is it in everyone
elses? Has he stopped the suicide bombers? No, then he's just as guilty if
he doesn't help stop the cause of the fighting. Now he wants the US to
clean the mess he started because he couldn't keep his people under control.
And the Jews got pissy and started to fight back instead of cowering. The
fact is, I don't watch CNN, if I do it's about the economy not about what's
happening god knows where. I make my decisions based on what I see fit from
everything I get information on, not just what CNN tells me.
Objectiveness is a horrible thing, it leads to violence, "he's a freedom
fighter" to one side might burden the rights of the people he's fighting,
thus he's a terrorist to them. If they'd all stop fighting, it'd be much
better. I really so no reason to fight.. ooh just because they're in your
land, who cares, get over it, the worlds a big place. Am I correct as to
why the Jews and Palestines are fighting? Over land? Maybe I got the wrong
information there, please correct me.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbdb041 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "just saying don't defend them if you aren't there to witness it."
>
> emm my cousin was there, he was part of the organisers from red cross....
>
> and the reason i care, is cuz i have news channnels other then CNN. and
each
> one shows a side, and shows the amount of people killed, just like that
camp
> filled with 40k people, who they went into, and started taking down
building
> by building. they made allo the people got the square, while they took it
> down, now bet u never heard bout that did u? or the fact that bush and
blair
> calling arafat a terrorist, when hes nothing more then a freedom
fighter...
> i got my facts right, i know what im talking bout, and this time it aint
> night, and i aint confused, now i advize u to watch some channel like
> al-jazera, and just look at the videos they have, u dont even have to
> understand what they are talking bout.
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbd9f6a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
part
> of
> it.
Palestine/Isreal
> going
> each
> sad
go
> own
help
> to
> even
far
a
make
underwear
bomb
> Isreal,
> him
home
> is
so
>
>
|
Apr 17, 2002, 3:43pm
Actually no, the US had nothing to do with that :). Churchill proclaimed
that land to be the Jewish homeland after the defeat of the Axis powers. So
if you want to blame someone for all of it, blame England.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbdb3cb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> emm, wasnt it the US and britian who accually put the isreali's in there
in
> the begining? after WW2 when hitler was killing em all...
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbdb30c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> really
things
aren't
> everyone
guilty
> if
> control.
The
> what's
> from
fighting,
much
your
to
> wrong
> cross....
and
that
> it
aint
> witness
> people
a
go
you're
> hate
> It's
> it,
yall
fix
> it
> your
> anyone
So
bombs
> question
> almost
a
> Take
> westerns
>
>
|
Apr 17, 2002, 9:46pm
He lost his right to post probably from these pictures.. that'd be my guess.
Some of the uniforms don't seem to match up either.. did anyone else notice
that? And the street is different in the picture where it looks like the
guy is shooting the other guy.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"nornny11" <Nornny1 at attbi.com> wrote in message
news:3cbdf9e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Umm...was there a point to this thread besides showing some gruesome
> pictures (especially when there are kids viewing this?). Forward this
post?
> First off, if you copied this from an email chain, you should've NEVER
> wasted even more bandwith and internet congestion emailing it out. That's
> what we call propoganda, and anyone who creates email chains are NOT, I
> repeat NOT doing it out of their kind little hearts. They're not only
> manipulating you as a person, but contributing to slow internet
connections
> worldwide and other bad perils. Email chains (even in the form of a
> newsgroup post, which is even worse, really) I consider a form of internet
> terrorism (such as hacking), but more so SPAM. It hurts EVERYONE, and no
one
> gains from it. People are dumb enough to trust 15th hand sources, and
these
> email chains thrive off that stupidity. No one can say those are real
> pictures, even with credible evidence, unless they were there. Plus, the
> chain is very objective in the first place, I don't care who's side you're
> on.
>
> I'll make up my own opinions from my own experiences, thanks.
>
> Sorry if this is considered flaming to you, but did you truly expect a
whole
> line of sympathy replies when you're debating a two sided issue? Think
> before you post, and the reactions might not be so intimidating.
>
> Nornny
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbd9895 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this
have
> a
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2002, 12:45am
Well there'd still be some little bickers here and there with conflicting
views.. and people being stubborn. But no where near the size of what
they've been.. WW2, the crusades, etc.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
news:3cbe3218$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is the reason why I hate all religions,jewish,islam,christian
etc..the
> religions are just something that is made up to brainwash
people,preventing
> them from thinking logically,the root of all evil.I am sure there would
not
> be a single war in the world if we had not religions;if people was allowed
> to use logic instead.
>
> Drac
> swe <m_swehli at hotmail.com> kirjoitti
> viestissä:3cbd9895 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
bout
him.
and
> doesn't
prison??
> this
have
> a
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2002, 1:54pm
I didn't just say that? :P
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"bonzai" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cbeb2d2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if there wouldnt be any religion , there would be far less war on this
world
> , and to the israelies i say , lok back what happend in WW2 .
>
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:3cbe3363$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
conflicting
would
> allowed
> is
him
the
is
> county
forward
can
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2002, 5:02pm
If there was no religion, how could it be interpreted in an extreme way?
Thus the source is the misuse, yes, but it also has to have it's basis,
which is the religion itself.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"carolann" <carolannh at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3cbf104f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If it is religion that starts or fuels (some) wars, it is man's doing, not
> God's. If you don't believe in God anyway then you already know that,
right?
> If you do believe in God then you know that it is the interpretation that
> some men have, not God himself, that makes men war. And often religion is
> just an excuse to take what they want. We in the US have been told over
and
> over again not to blame all Muslims for the recent events in the US
because
> it was not the religion of Islam that brought this about but the extremist
> followers of a group of men using that religion as the reason for their
> idiocy. How can anyone blame religion for the lunacy of people who use
death
> and destruction as a means to get what they want when the majority of the
> world's believers use their religion as a source of peace and comfort in
> these times? The numbers of those who turn to their God dramatically
> increased these last months, as they always do in times of war. Using you
> theory it would follow then that in my small town of extremely diverse
> faiths we would be constantly at war with one another but instead have
just
> passed the 75th year of celebrating Holy days together in each other's
> houses of worship. This practice we have is not unique in the US either.
> True followers recognize that they might have different views and are
> tolerant of that and work with, not against, each other for the good of
> their fellow man. The people who cause these problems are extremely
> misguided and use "religion" to do whatever they want, they hide behind
it.
> (and what about WW2? You certainly don't mean the nazi's persecution of
the
> Jewish people?) Those who blame religion for the world's ills are
certainly
> not the ones who know and study it. They are also the minority of
followers,
> so please don't say that religion causes the worlds wars, but tell it like
> it is and blame fanatics when "religion" is the cause at all as was the
case
> on September 11, 2001. It's like the fat person blaming food for their
size,
> not their use or misuse of it.
>
> "bonzai" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbeb2d2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> world
> conflicting
> would
think
nothing
to
second
> him
he
> the
he
> is
any
> forward
> can
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2002, 6:16pm
Well, you could teach the man the right way to use the food. It is
pleasure, but you shouldn't take sole pleasure just in eating. Moderation
needs to be taken in. And the jew thing, it wasn't there fault, the nazi's
didn't like any religion, but they hated Jew's the most. I think mainly
because hitler's family was jewish.. and he hated them that much. His
grandmother was at least :P.. yeah we'd still have fighting but things like
9/11 wouldn't have happened. It's because their "god" told them it was the
right thing to do in their mind.. but I'm sure they would've found some
other excuse to do it. Some people are just mentally unstable I guess.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"carolann" <carolannh at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3cbf250c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yes, I really have to agree, it is the misuse..and that is true of many
> problems about anything in the world today and always. But if some misuse
a
> thing, none should have it even though the thing itself is not at fault?
> Then we may logically do away with many things. I knew an 8 year old
killed
> by a drunken driver.(many have been) so lets do away with cars and alcohol
> so it won't happen again. Don't worry about those (most) who use both
> wisely. If I may, for simplicities sake, use my overweight person/food
> analogy because it is less complicated than religion. If a person has
> misused food and becomes overweight would it be in his best interest to
take
> away his food, or encourage him to learn how to use it as it was intended
to
> be used? It is meant to be a source of nourishment and sustenance, not
> solely as a source of pleasure and self-gratification. If used properly,
it
> will be a source of pleasure anyway. It is also meant to be shared in a
> peaceful and happy setting. Ok-so we take away this food that has caused
all
> his problems..our overweight person would certainly not gain any more
weight
> but his quality of life would surely suffer. My guess is though..while he
> was still able, he might find something else to abuse because that has
> proven to be his nature. But on the other hand, many (the majority of)
> people use food as it is meant to be used and it does for them just what
it'
> s intended to and they have not had to make one other person suffer
because
> of it. Someone might say then..as may have been alluded to in a previous
> post, what about the persecution of the Jewish people by nazis during WW2?
> Man decided he was doing the right thing there-as he has done from the day
> the world's trouble's started. Logic tells us they were not, though. No
> religion, no wars? Be realistic, man will always find something. We can't
> confuse religions with a few individual's interpretations of them. Logic
> tells me that the majority who practice a peaceful religion and have a
> relationship with a loving God may have it the right way. No man is
without
> fault but the righteous will always strive to get as close as he can.
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbf1833$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Apr 20, 2002, 2:18am
There's a lot of places we could move either side to, they're just bickering
over a small strip of land. The world's a big place.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"missb" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3cc0e8fb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> silenced <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cbd9d09$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> through,
> other..
the
>
> Land is a lot like sex or air .... you only realise how important it is
when
> you dont have any.
>
> MissB
>
>
|
Apr 20, 2002, 6:40pm
ooo ahh, It's the holy land to about 40 other religions the exist too. All
I see is those 2 fighting about it because they have nothing better to do.
Jeez, pull something like, my messiah's spirit traveled through here during
it's eternal life, I proclaim this my new holy land.. and do it where no one
else is. What makes it a holy land anyways? Jeez who cares, it's just a
place to live, just go visit it for god sakes if you can't come to an
agreement on who should own it.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3cc1a7fd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Its the "holy land" to either side...or so i hear
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> A message from Zeo Toxion
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc0ec14$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> bickering
through
> in
pointless
> it
to
is
>
>
|
Apr 20, 2002, 7:56pm
LoL Jesus was born around that area ;). They were defending the Church of
the Nativity a couple of weeks ago. Supposedly that's where he was born.
They're just a little over zealous about things.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3cc1dd86 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Look they don't think about these kinds of things the way we do. Religious
> beliefs or any other beliefs can drive a person to do anything if they
> believe its the right thign to do. Who knows maybe they think jesus was
born
> there or something. Its not somethign i want to get into becuase i really
> cant do anything about it.
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> A message from Zeo Toxion
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc1d257$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> All
do.
> during
> one
a
> going
> each
> sad
go
it
>
>
|
Apr 21, 2002, 6:54pm
To create your own objects you need to be fairly decent in math (that is if
you want to do it the old fashioned way). Or else you can use truespace
(www.caligari.com). Be advised, novice use of Truespace to create objects
will result in quite a bit of Framerate drop in your world.
As for running a world, not that much. Just a good internet connection and
a fast computer.. Do you want to run your Object path on your computer
locally?
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"maiguaelser" <istammberger at mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3cc31ef6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What technical skills do I need to have to run my own AW world and create
> objects for it? Thanks, Iris
>
>
|
Apr 22, 2002, 1:24am
Honestly Jerme, there's a lot of useless stuff there that you don't need for
hosting a world.. It's best not to give misleading information to people.
Look below for highlights.
> Probably the best way to run a world is to let someone else host it. Find
a
> hosting service ( I offer good, free hosting.. I can set you up with
> everything you need) and let them do all the dirty work. This let's you
> worry more about creating objects, building, and running things in your
> world.... Instead of worrying about server security, backing up your data,
> installing the world server, and web server admin.
Well, security of the world server isn't really a big thing. No Uber
crackers are out there hacking there way into the Activeworlds servers.
Thank the light for a non-popular piece of software. If there are any
security breaches, it's most likely with said software then with the actual
computer itself.
> To run a world on you own you'd probably need:
>
> -A computer to use to develop your objects and textures on (also used to
> build and access your world)
> -A computer to dedicate to hosting your world and the world's Object Path.
> (it doesn't have to be really fast.. just as long as it works)
Don't need to dedicate a computer just to hosting a world and object path,
but if you do want it all in one, you want to make sure it can handle your
daily work plus a little of object paths and world hosting. Anything above
400 MHz / 28 Mb of ram should do quite fine.
> -A relatively fast internet connection.. DSL./Cable or faster - with a
fixed
> IP address
Well if you don't turn off your computer the IP doesn't change.. having a
fixed IP is something that's relatively moot now-a-days with the world of
DNS2GO and other similar services.
> -Knowledge and experience at setting up and maintaining a web server
> -You'll need MS Windows (for newbies) or a free copy of Linux if you know
> what you're doing.
That pretty much covers most the computer world doesn't it? ;) Linux is
still quite easy to set up if you follow directions on Mauz's site. Not
quite as easy as Windows though, so I'd have him stick to windows, thus not
having to dedicate a computer.
> -Want a domain name? Better figure out how to use BIND (for Linux) or find
a
> DNS server for Windows.
Don't need a domain name really, like I said with the fixed IP things.
> -Experience with Photoshop or Painter (or any other nice image editing
> program) for creating your textures.
> -You'll need to lean RWX scripting and/or buy a copy of TrueSpace
> -Anything else I left out....
>
> Again, easiest thing is to let someone else host it. That way you can
learn
> RWX to create your objects, make your textures, and build using them
without
> worrying about all the server stuff.
It may not always be as convienient though IMHO. Say you need something
relatively fast.. but your hoster's not on.. what then? IE: someone
terrorizes your world because you were stupid and thought you could trust
them.. but then again, that's always going to happen :\.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
Apr 22, 2002, 1:25am
> 400 MHz / 28 Mb of ram should do quite fine.
That's supposed to be 128.. stupid me.
Apr 22, 2002, 5:45pm
Not really, the same object converted to RWX is much much faster, by 3 or 4
framerates in my case.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"robbie" <robbie at oriox.com> wrote in message
news:3cc45d86 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I disagree. Infact AW Renders COB files much better than RWX files becuase
> all they did is implement the Calligari COB engine which is much cleaner
and
> more efficient than the RWX system which is still quite messy in places.
I'm
> sure Roland is always improving it as best as h can, but since hes always
> working on the next version of AW, he must not get too much time to go
> through all the older code. Besides, when he does, hes at risk of messing
> somthing up (e.g. 3.2 Masking).
>
> The only reason that truespace objects could cause lower framerates is if
> they are cobdumped or (like a few people I know) the modeller is lacking
an
> vital obsession with low poly/vert counts. :)
>
> -Robbie
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc32716$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if
objects
> and
> create
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 1:45am
Yeah I understand now, but then again I don't think anyone really cares if
it's down for 5 or so minutes a day? I would definately recommend Apache
over IIS.. only an insane person uses IIS.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3cc4d29b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I could not run an OP and AW server off my personal/home system:
>
> 1) I install software and need to reboot everynow and then..
> 2) My system is not designed for being a server and thus does not have key
> components that are not required, but nice to have
> 3) My phone company is weird.. my ip address is semi-fixed, it tends to
> change without warning....
>
> This means, if you want serious, 24/7 hosting... then you *must* dedicate
a
> system doing nothing be serving up content.
>
> About using Linux.. I reccond it for security reasons. I agree that there
> aren't a *bunch* of crackers out there looking for security holes in the
> awserver, however.. i'm more worried about the HTTP server used for the
OP.
> Case in point: Microsot IIS Vs. Apache. Apache has had so few security
> exploits found that I could count them on my fingers... IIS on the other
> hand takes installing around, ohh say, 300 pathches (and then it's still
not
> very secure). So, again.. if you're serious about hosting your OP and
> world, you're going to need a good server, in other words: Avoid IIS at
all
> costs (get apache, even if you have to settle for the win32 version).
>
> Again, all the stuff I mentioned was for *serious* hosting.. If you're
only
> going to be hosting your world and your own IP, and you don't mind if it's
> down from time to time... Then:
> -Download and install the AW world server..
> http://www.activeworlds.com/products/download.asp
> -Download and intall/configure the Apache web server...
> http://httpd.apache.org/
> -Find a free dynamic DNS service, and get them to help you register your
> domain name (if you want/need one)
>
> But, even doing it yourself has its disadvantages.. That's why I still
> recomend letting someone who has the proper equipment host it for you.
Makes
> life a lot simpler for you.
>
>
> -JerMe
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker
> JTech Web Systems
> (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc3825c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> for
people.
> Find
you
your
> data,
> actual
to
> Path.
path,
your
> above
a
of
> know
> not
> find
trust
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 2:21am
Much better then IIS I'm sure about that.. but I would certainly recommend
stepping up to Apache. These guys have been around since the birth of the
Windows operating system.. I think they were before it? Not sure I'd have
to check. They certainly know what they're doing :) Much faster, and you
have a lot more available in the available addons (more then 60% of the
world uses Apache for a webserver). Best of all it's free and open source!
:D
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"mongo" <mongo at drmongo.com> wrote in message
news:3cc4e0aa at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've had excellent results with Xitami myself as a web server.
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc4d8da$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
if
Apache
> key
to
> dedicate
> there
the
the
security
other
still
at
> it's
your
> need
it.
with
let's
your
Uber
> servers.
any
> used
Object
handle
Anything
with
> a
> having
world
server
you
Linux
> is
> Not
> thus
> or
things.
> editing
> can
them
> something
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 1:43am
Most likely it's a virus, don't run it. This is a very bad e-mail cover up,
there's better ways of doing it. I smell script kiddies again ;)
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3cc4d7b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I got a strange email from "cof" that contained the file rock.exe. Not
sure
> if its a virus but it says its from cof at activeworlds.com but I know it
> isn't. I checked the source and it said something along the lines of
> chris at legalassistance.co.uk or something....
>
> Not sure but since it was from someone that knows about COF and directed
it
> to me, others in AW could be affected.
>
> Any info on rock.exe? Thanks.
> --
> Mayor 'tax
> www.swcity.net
>
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 9:38am
It might be the new virus going around.. what's the subject say?
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3cc4f555 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol of course I'm not gonna run it. :-P
> I checked the source and popped it.
> --
> Mayor 'tax
> www.swcity.net
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc4d863 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> up,
directed
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 7:15pm
LOL that just makes it seem more like a virus.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3cc5ce5f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sure thing...just got another email from him today.
>
>
> Return-Path: <chris at legalsupport.co.uk>
> Received: from mx1b.mts.net ([205.200.16.58]) by msg1.mts.net
> (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GV192Y00.9M3 for
> <sfris at mts.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:08:58 -0500
> Received: from mx.mailix.net (mx.mailix.net [216.148.221.135])
> by mx1b.mts.net (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g3NI8vx23038
> for <sfris at mts.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:08:57 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: from [212.69.192.6] (helo=smtp-relay1.noc.dsvr.net)
> by mx.mailix.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
> id 1704ik-0008Vw-00
> for syntax at swcity.net; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:08:54 -0700
> Received: from [212.69.197.117] (helo=legalsupport.dsvr.co.uk)
> by smtp-relay1.noc.dsvr.net with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1)
> id 1704ij-0002go-00
> for syntax at swcity.net; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:08:53 +0100
> Received: from Qmo (dsl-62-3-74-70.zen.co.uk [62.3.74.70])
> by legalsupport.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g3NI8lv14822
> for <syntax at swcity.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:08:47 +0100
> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:08:47 +0100
> Message-Id: <200204231808.g3NI8lv14822 at legalsupport.dsvr.co.uk>
> From: mistersdk <mistersdk at hotmail.com>
> To: syntax at swcity.net
> Subject: A special humour game
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
>
> --Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
> Content-Type: text/html;
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY>
>
> <FONT>This is a special humour game<br>
> This game is my first work.<br>
> You're the first player.<br>
> I hope you would like it.</FONT></BODY></HTML>
>
> --Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
> name=kitty.exe
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-ID: <IS7f7QZr>
>
> (big mass of jumbled letters and numbers..you know..)
>
> --Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
> name=nature[1].htm
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-ID: <IS7f7QZr>
>
> (jumble)
>
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3cc58f20$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 7:56pm
It uses an exploit (a security hole) that allows the attachment to be
executed when viewing the message with Microsoft Outlook Express or Outlook
(without Service Packs installed). This method is similar to the one used by
Nimda or Kak worms.
If he's read it.. he's already been infected (that is if he doesn't have the
service packs).
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"kit" <dominicl at clear.net.nz> wrote in message
news:3CC5D36B.A50FE6B9 at clear.net.nz...
> Hello Gang,
>
> Here's the info you seek about rock.exe. Its a nasty one.
> http://home.earthlink.net/~doniteli/index15-51.htm
>
> Cheers,
> Kit
>
> syntax wrote:
>
sure
it
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 8:06pm
Just reread that whole crapload.. it told your computer to execute the
attachment kitty.exe
Without the service packs installed (as said earlier) your computer is
probably infected as we speak.. run your normal antivirus after you update
it's virus list and head on over to antivirus.com and use the free net scan
(to ensure the most up to date virus list is being used). It's always good
to scan with more then one antivirus program :). Below is what's telling it
to execute the file:
"Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=kitty.exe"
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3cc5ce5f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sure thing...just got another email from him today.
>
>
> Return-Path: <chris at legalsupport.co.uk>
> Received: from mx1b.mts.net ([205.200.16.58]) by msg1.mts.net
> (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GV192Y00.9M3 for
> <sfris at mts.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:08:58 -0500
> Received: from mx.mailix.net (mx.mailix.net [216.148.221.135])
> by mx1b.mts.net (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g3NI8vx23038
> for <sfris at mts.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:08:57 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: from [212.69.192.6] (helo=smtp-relay1.noc.dsvr.net)
> by mx.mailix.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
> id 1704ik-0008Vw-00
> for syntax at swcity.net; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:08:54 -0700
> Received: from [212.69.197.117] (helo=legalsupport.dsvr.co.uk)
> by smtp-relay1.noc.dsvr.net with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1)
> id 1704ij-0002go-00
> for syntax at swcity.net; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:08:53 +0100
> Received: from Qmo (dsl-62-3-74-70.zen.co.uk [62.3.74.70])
> by legalsupport.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g3NI8lv14822
> for <syntax at swcity.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:08:47 +0100
> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:08:47 +0100
> Message-Id: <200204231808.g3NI8lv14822 at legalsupport.dsvr.co.uk>
> From: mistersdk <mistersdk at hotmail.com>
> To: syntax at swcity.net
> Subject: A special humour game
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
>
> --Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
> Content-Type: text/html;
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY>
>
> <FONT>This is a special humour game<br>
> This game is my first work.<br>
> You're the first player.<br>
> I hope you would like it.</FONT></BODY></HTML>
>
> --Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
> name=kitty.exe
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-ID: <IS7f7QZr>
>
> (big mass of jumbled letters and numbers..you know..)
>
> --Y242jmGMBnnM8u9KN605NC27gr837R
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
> name=nature[1].htm
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-ID: <IS7f7QZr>
>
> (jumble)
>
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3cc58f20$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Apr 23, 2002, 8:19pm
Well, most good viruses don't use outlook, they connect to a known SMTP
server, such as AOL's and use it to propagate E-mail to addresses it grabbed
from your address book. But it's always good just in case :). That's the
part where firewalls come in handy! Just a side note, BlackIce isn't a good
firewall for that either ;).. it only protects incoming transmissions, not
outgoing.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3cc5dbb0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Since the patch is only avaliable for 5.x and i have 6 then im all set for
> that sort of thing. An e-mail scanning capable virus-scanner is also a
good
> thing becuase it will catch the virus before you even open it and get rid
of
> it. I also have mine scan outgoing so that if somethign tries to
automaticly
> send a virus to everyone on my adress book for example it will detect it
and
> block those.
>
> If you have 5.x of internetexplorer/outlookexpress then apply that patch.
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> A message from Zeo Toxion
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc5d8a4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Outlook
used
> by
> the
Not
it
of
> directed
>
>
|
Apr 24, 2002, 5:00pm
Well with OE it usually does execute it.. sorry I wasn't at all awake that
day ;) Though you were not going to post anymore?
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3cc6e3f0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc5db00$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> No, all that "tells" your computer is what kind of data is coming next. If
> your email reader automatically executes it, that's not the fault of the
> content-type setting.
>
> -Agent1
>
>
|
Apr 24, 2002, 5:01pm
Did I say SMTP? What the hell was I smoking? LoL again I'll say I wasn't
at all awake that much yesterday.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3cc6de5b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the good mail-scanning AV acts as a proxy... the way Norton AV works is
that
> if it detects on RETR command on a POP3 connection (I guess it uses the
> remote port to identify it) it launches it's mailscanner. same thing for
> outgoing, if it detects a DATA command it scans the content before it
relays
> it to the server (doesn't work well if you're connected to the server as
> localhost lol), so it's completely independent of the clients.
>
> KAH
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc5de0a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> grabbed
the
> good
not
> for
> rid
it
> patch.
be
> have
rock.exe.
> know
lines
>
>
|
Apr 24, 2002, 7:24pm
Kick butt, good job ;). Symantec has something on their website that checks
for that just in case, might want to give it a run through.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3cc72187 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Don't worry my sons, I have my preview windows off and all critical
updates
> installed.
> --
> Mayor 'tax
> www.swcity.net
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc5d8a4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Outlook
used
> by
> the
Not
it
of
> directed
>
>
|
Apr 24, 2002, 7:35pm
Yup, that's one of the things that viruses try to do. They always try to
send themselves to other people in a hope that it can spread. I really
don't understand why people make viruses.. they do no good and make no
sense.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3cc72491 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmm....I looked through my registry and everything and there is no trace
of
> a virus anywhere. (looking on that site that Kit gave us)
>
> BUT...SW Comit and OniLink...two AW friends of mine, got e-mails from me
> with subjects saying "sos!" which is part of the virus. Is it possible
that
> it can send itself automatically? O_o
> --
> Mayor 'tax
> www.swcity.net
>
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cc72277$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> checks
be
> have
rock.exe.
> know
lines
>
>
|
|