|
silenced // User Search
silenced // User Search
Mar 27, 2002, 7:29pm
> some people with crap machines to actually test for the problems/bigs...
bugs that is
Mar 27, 2002, 8:21pm
As I look at the list of the posters on the beta team they all seem to be
people closely tied into AW. Agent1, Mauz, you, etc. You may not be close
but you know people.. it still should be an open beta, or they should at
least take in a lot more people. The only reason for this is because of the
price increase. When most people find something major, it's either a minor
bug to them, or they just won't fix it as fast as they would from the betas.
Paying more money for a new version that works like crap isn't a good way to
keep people, you need to get them into the development of the software,
makes for a much better product in the long run.
16 MB is still a fairly decent video card ;). MHz has nothing to do with
AW.. besides the minimum requirement. I could see a 500 MHz machine with
512 MB's of ram (or more) and a 128 mb video card blowing a 2.5 GHz machine
with a 5 mb video card and 128 mb ram out of the hole ;)
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3ca23fa4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, you have it all wrong :). I'm a beta tester and I have a 450MHz
with
> a 16MB video card. Nothing 'ubahl33t' about my setup, its falling apart.
> There are others with crappy computers on the team too, I suppose. Oh,
and
> I'm not a close 'buddy' of anyone at AWC that could give me beta access.
>
> -Joe
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3ca239b7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> with
of
going
> filling
> half
box
AW!!
>
>
|
Mar 27, 2002, 8:36pm
They still need to throw some of the old beta testers out.. it suprises me
that insanity is a beta tester.. Rotate for god sakes. Some of us other
folks would like to try it too. Since I probably won't be here by the time
it's released I'd like to do it even.
Gee if I throw a link on my site can I be one too?!
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3ca248c1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> By making it public Roland just couldn't keep up with the bug reports. By
> having a small group of testers, there's a smaller amount of reports
coming
> in at a time. Also the same bug isn't reported a thousand times. It
gives
> Roland a wide range of systems without having lots of people. I think the
> current system works, but that may just be me. But making it public, I
think
> would be pushing it. They did make it private for a reason, correct?
>
> -Joe
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3ca245e6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
be
> close
> the
> minor
> betas.
way
> to
with
with
> machine
> apart.
Oh,
access.
saps
> get
> problems/bigs...
> the
> out
> video
:).
than
> box
tab
reinstall
>
>
|
Mar 27, 2002, 8:45pm
Or maybe.. How about an open beta.. disable bug submissions, then only allow
a few people to post to the beta newsgroup. That way roland gets what he
needs, and everyone gets to try out the new browser.
Simply tell everyone not to submit bugs, they'll be ignored.
It's a fairly decent compromise, it's not like anything bad's going to
happen if you let people take part in a beta.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3ca24984$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> They still need to throw some of the old beta testers out.. it suprises me
> that insanity is a beta tester.. Rotate for god sakes. Some of us other
> folks would like to try it too. Since I probably won't be here by the
time
> it's released I'd like to do it even.
>
> Gee if I throw a link on my site can I be one too?!
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3ca248c1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
By
> coming
> gives
the
> think
> be
at
of
> way
software,
> with
> with
450MHz
> Oh,
> access.
> saps
Jeez,
to
little
your
> :).
big,
> than
Video!
tab
> tab
> reinstall
>
>
|
Mar 27, 2002, 9:23pm
That's why you give roland a new e-mail address and don't post it, then they
just ignore the new one :)
Either way he's going to get bugged. Firstly by people who want to be in
the betas.. and they'll contiounsly send e-mails. Or a couple of bug
reports from those same people.
It's all part of being in a company and business, you have to deal with lots
of people. :P
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3CA24FCB.72035F4 at andras.net...
> silenced wrote:
allow
he
>
> Imagine Roland's mailbox then :) I don't wish you to be in the same seat!
>
> Andras
|
Mar 27, 2002, 9:23pm
Ugh
> just ignore the new one :)
Old one..
Mar 27, 2002, 11:07pm
Umm I know full well that a beta is not a finished piece of programming.
You think I haven't beta tested programs before? Why do people think that
everyone is less knowledgefully about things then they are? I know all the
risks associated with beta testing as well, anyone who has does. You may
not want to do it, but I and quite a few others do.
Open Betas are all full and well, no one has to partake if they don't want
to, thus it's an open beta. It seems more logical to give it to people such
as myself other than the "PR" people of AW because I do things like RWX
development, building, texture mapping, etc etc..
I'm not trying to start an arguement here but it was just a suggestion. I
seem to find a lot of bugs without even looking for them. Now imagine if
people like me actually were part of the beta team. Dur, could it be that
you'd have more of a variety of systems if you allowed everyone? More of a
chance of finding that bug?
Either way, Roland is going to be bombarded with E-mails. Firstly, to join
the beta team. Secondly, bug reports if open beta was allowed. Maybe a few
more in the later, but I'm sure he doesn't really read most of the stuff he
gets.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3CA25E40.6040105 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> You seem to be forgetting that a beta is *not* a finished piece of
> programming. There are a lot of risks involved with trying a beta
> program, and you should not sign up for one just because you want to get
> a sneak peek at the new stuff. The only people who should be using it
> are those who are actively searching for bugs and trying their damndest
> to break the thing, thereby by making it better when it gets officially
> released.
>
> That's why it's a closed beta, because Roland knows the people who are a
> part of it are the ones who actually take the time to beta test it
> properly, and aren't just in for a free show.
>
> silenced wrote:
>
allow
he
me
other
>
> --
> Goober King
> And for god sakes, SNIP!!
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Mar 28, 2002, 1:28am
LoL I was thinking about asking him too.. just worth a shot. Maybe a well
written letter with nothing offensive? :)
Still wouldn't an open beta be good while only allowing a few people to post
to the beta newsgroup? It'd be the best of both worlds.
But oh well, guess it sucks.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3CA285B4.1070307 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Well, in case you forgot or weren't around, beta tests used to be open,
> but Roland got tired of having to deal with a) people sending in reports
> on bugs that had already been reported (and in some cases, fixed), b)
> bickering in the beta NGs (mostly Eep) and c) a lot of people just
> freeloading, downloading the beta and never contributing. After he
> changed it to a closed beta, Roland related to me that he felt he was
> getting a *lot* more accomplished because he didn't have to wade through
> all the BS.
>
> I'm sure if you were put on the beta team, you would do an excellent
> job. But the same simply cannot be said about the rest of AW, as past
> experience has proven. It's been shown that the closed beta system works
> best, so if it ain't broke, don't fix it! I don't know how Roland plans
> to pick the beta testers this time around, since he used to do it based
> on who showed up to Tech Talk. But since he's not doing TT anymore, it's
> anyone's guess how he hopes to pick the right people. We'll just have to
> see, I guess (supposedly, if you actually ask Roland to be on the beta
> team, that immediately excludes you from being on said team).
>
> Keep your eyes and ears open!
>
> silenced wrote:
>
that
the
may
want
such
I
if
that
of a
join
few
he
suprises
reports.
think
I
to
be
should
because
a
the
good
>
> --
> Goober King
> Does anyone actually read these things?
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 2:00pm
Mmm, the smell of script kiddies is in the air today ladies and gentlemen.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"dark mod" <dark_mod at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ca731bb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oh no...he is absolutely correct 100% I have a list of 53 op pws...and i
> assume some people cracked the password on the zip file and have it
> too...Yes these pws were the work at a time of the beloved AWST
> browser...which the list was given to me. and for a long time it stayed
that
> way but since i left AW why not let some others have some fun with it
>
> have a nice day
> -Dark Mod
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3ca705f1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 2:07pm
Most likely he'll get them again. What's the point? Rotate them every 2
days. This is why you close off access to your worlds ;).
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3ca73392 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You can smell em?
>
> anyway folks, you have a admission.
>
> I recomend everyone changes their OP Pw's
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3ca732b2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
gentlemen.
i
stayed
> worlds,
> PW's
> to!
> list,
tool
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 2:09pm
A lot of those AW ones everyone knew...
--Bowen--
Apr 1, 2002, 6:59pm
LOL! he's not a hacker, he used a program to cause damage, that's a script
kiddie/cracker.
I believe script kiddie fits him best.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:3ca8c9b5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3ca732b2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
gentlemen.
>
> Either that or a self-admitting (and not to mentiion ARROGANT) computer
> hacker.
>
> Strike, you REALLY have a LOT of nerve boasting like that in public (that
is
> ASSUMING you're telling us the truth).
>
> Patrick
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 2:22pm
Well even to the dismay of what's happened, I'd like to wish everyone a
Happy Easter... / whatever else you celebrate.
--Bowen--
Apr 1, 2002, 9:03pm
almost not :
http://64.39.46.200/2002/LAW/1/4/gates.murder.01/index.html
That's not Cnn's IP :P, it's funny none-the-less.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <virtualcarlbanks at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ca8e57e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> http://www.cnn.com at 64.39.46.200/2002/LAW/1/4/gates.murder.01/index.html
>
>
|
Apr 2, 2002, 10:18pm
Andras and myself came up with a new idea, he's preparing it as we speak :)
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"zippy k" <zippyk at virtualwonderland.com> wrote in message
news:3caa428f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> After the latest Games that World Owners had to go through with the object
> path,
> I was wondering if any one knows if an .htaccsess file can be used for
> directory security on the web server?
> any feed back would be welcome
> ZippyK
> __________________________________________________________________
>
>
|
Apr 3, 2002, 1:32am
Sounds like a very good plan to me. Better then zip passworded files
accessable by HTTP :)
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3caa75b8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The recent events have prompted a lot of people to reconsider the .zip
file
> passwords, including me. As was proven, ZIP passwords are not sufficient
to
> protect object paths. It takes only a matter of hours, sometimes minutes
to
> crack a ZIP password. How people get the zip files to crack is the first
> problem, finding a different method of encryption (that cannot be so
easily
> cracked) is a much larger problem.
>
> First, all attempts to hide the object path's URL were totally obliterated
> when the "object warnings" feature was added. Sure, it can be very
helpful
> when you're working with new objects, trying to perfect your model, but it
> was a major oversight on the part of AWC. The solution to the first
problem
> would be to allow the user to turn on and off object warnings (just like
> they can now), but not actually print them unless the user has caretaker
> privileges in the current world. Also... why not just name the cache
files
> by the world name they come from? Store all the paths, or data that needs
to
> be cached in a encrypted file somewhere.
>
> To solve the second problem: Why not use strong encryption? Such as PGP
> keys... This system has been proven very secure. I'm not sure anyone knows
> how to crack these (I've heard only the government code breaks, with the
> supercomputers at their fingers can break these) If not this, *something*
is
> needed.. if not a proprietary tool for encryption (which I would not
> recommend for obvious reasons) I'm not sure if strong encryption is truly
> practical, as it takes a lot of processor usage, and would be slow to
> decrypt hundreds of objects..
>
> Here's how it works... You use a program like PGP (Pretty Good Privacy)
> (check out the yahoo search here for an explanation -->
>
http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=%2b%22pgp%22+%2b%22explanation%22&hc=0&h
> s=0 ) to create your public and private keys. You then use the private
key
> to encrypt your object files. (You'll want to make a backup of your
private
> key, but keep it safe - you don't want anyone else to have it). You
upload
> the PGP encrypted versions of your objects to your object path just like
> normal (maybe a different file extension).
>
> Then when someone enters your world, the browser should receive notice
that
> the OP is PGP encrypted, and the world server will transfer the *public*
key
> to the browser. (Note: the public key should not be available via HTTP..
it
> could then be downloaded, and would defeat the purpose of all this
> encryption) The browser should store this key internally, and loose the
> information when the user exits the world. The idea is to keep the user
> from every being able to discover the public key, and only allowing the AW
> browser to have the public key, in a situation where the use could not
grab
> it from a file later on. The key should not be stored permanently, or even
> semi- permanently, on the user's hard drive. The browser then uses this
> public key it has received to decrypt the objects and display them
normally.
>
> I'm not sure this setup would actually work when put into use, it's just
an
> idea. It would definitely impact initial world load times, but it
shouldn't
> cause significant lag as the objects only need to be decoded once (as they
> come into view). Exploring areas with objects that your browser hasn't
seen
> in that session would be the laggiest. This would have to be considered,
as
> there are hundreds of objects that would need to be decoded in some
worlds,
> just by standing at GZ.
>
> No matter the disadvantages, this would be the *ultimate* in security for
> object path's. I've forward this e-mail to Roland, E N Z O, and AW support
> as I believe it is of the utmost importance.
>
> Let me know what you think...
>
> Regards,
> Jeremy
>
> a.k.a. JerMe (#296967)
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker
> JTech Web Systems
> (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
|
Apr 5, 2002, 6:08pm
That's one downside to the US. We definately need a new system of
government and laws. Rework the Amendments to disallow any outside money to
gov't officials.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cadd569 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL!!!! today people will sue over absoultly anything!
> "binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
> news:3cadd342$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> something other than their
> us who log on.
> bad experience he had
> he know he'd become a
> PetsWarehouse.com
can
> come back to haunt
> message to other APD
> expected, and with higher
> site about planted
about
> PetsWarehouse.com in
> company, and even pointed
> of friends sharing
were
> read by the store's
> defamation.
> PetsWarehouse.com, based in
> Aquatic Plant Digest
> maintains it as a
> in compensatory and
statements
> and the dilution of
> court papers, to
and
> mental distress."
>
>
|
Apr 5, 2002, 7:09pm
It doesn't matter who hasn't done it. Most of our gov't officials are
corrupt because they get big business money. 90% of lawsuits aren't thrown
out. Ever hear of the one where a robber was robbing a house and fell on a
knife? He sued the people he robbed, and won the lawsuit. Now tell me
that's not frivilious.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3cae10af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What kind of liberationist weed have you been smoking? If it ain't broke,
> don't fix it. Most frivilous lawsuits are thrown out by the judge. You
> shouldn't limit someone's freedom to bring a lawsuit to court. If it's
> truly frivolous, most likely it'll get thrown out.
>
> IMO, this is why the US is the most popular country in the world. People
> can do almost anything they darn well please. Downside or not, the system
> works and works well. Name me 10 countries in the world who haven't
drafted
> an entirely new constitution in the last 200 years. >:)
>
> SW Chris
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cae042a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
money
> to
all
> of
about
> a
> did
> the
online
in
> a
> Web
> group
Internet,
claim
> of
> the
who
> million
in
humiliation,
>
>
|
Apr 5, 2002, 7:35pm
I don't remember that, it was a long time ago. We talked about it in my
Government Mechanics class :P. I wish I still had the article on it..
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"jey" <BoBo1186 at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3cae1768 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That was on the movie Liar Liar, with Jim Carey. I am not quite sure I
> would believe that its true. Find me the news story and maybe I'll believe
> it.
>
> silenced <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cae127c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> thrown
on
> a
> broke,
You
it's
> People
> system
about
impacts
> Nor
filed
> by
2001,
> he'd
> own
> warning
> the
a
members
> of
woman
> said
>
>
|
Apr 8, 2002, 2:20am
It's a pretty damn "frivilious" one. It's more so then anything I've ever
seen.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3cb109af at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> never said 90 percent of lawsuits are thrown out.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cae127c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> thrown
on
> a
> broke,
You
it's
> People
> system
about
impacts
> Nor
filed
> by
2001,
> he'd
> own
> warning
> the
a
members
> of
woman
> said
>
>
|
Apr 9, 2002, 1:24am
You never said most.. you just said if it was truely frivilious.. and it
is/was.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3cb21b28 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yes I remember that. That's why I said most of them, not all, are thrown
> out.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cb10c7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
ever
are
fell
> me
ain't
judge.
the
haven't
of
> outside
> Digest
> $4,150.
> say
> than
> his
> with
> unlike
> man's
of
> $15
libelous
he
>
>
|
Apr 9, 2002, 8:31pm
Very true.. it's all about the money ;). Power corrupts, and absolute power
corrupst absolutely... that's my favorite quote of all time.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3cb35844$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Some judges are really not fit to be judges...
>
> SW Chris
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cb250c4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> thrown
I've
officials
> aren't
and
> tell
> If
> world.
not,
> system
> gurgling
it
> lawsuit
> you
> 15,
later
sale.
> maintains
put
> a
> experiences
not
> the
another
Novak
other
> the
> for
> led,
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
|
Apr 11, 2002, 2:46am
>
> The RIAA come to mind here.....
>
> 90% of lawsuits aren't thrown
>
> That's why people dread the idea of going to JURY DUTY...
And why people "mysteriously" lose them in the mail. I don't understand
jury duty.. if it's my right to server on the jury.. it should be my right
not to and not be the judge of someone's crime. Maybe I don't want to
decided someone's guilty? :P
> Well now gee Bowen....Falling on that knife serves him right, dontcha
> think?? I measn think about it. Had he not broken into that woman's
home,
> he wouldn't have landed on that knife and he most certainly wouldn't have
> been wounded by it either. If *I* was on that jury, I would've taken the
> "serves him right" approach and voted NOT GUILTY.
>
Some people don't have a lot of common sense though.. Hence why most of
these lawsuits come to be. Oh you peed in my toilet without my permission
while looking in the mirror, time to sue you!
> Same goes for the plant guy. If he had delivered what he had promised
WHEN
> he promised, his name or company wouldn't have been plastered all over the
> Internet like it was. Again, it serves him right.
People are way to jumpy with the deformation of character and slander.
Slander is saying.. well you screwed me over, so I'm going to take your
picture and put it around town saying what you did. Not just saying... "god
you're so stupid.. I should warn my friends about you."
Nothing really big, we just really need to change our laws to protect the
innocent bystandards more. Such as from fraud, and the likes. The gov't is
made for the citizens and by the citizens, that's the principle of
democracy, but for some reason it's being run by a totalitarian republic.
Basically we select people we want to represent us, but they're being payed
off and people they didn't originaly want get put into power. The biggest
representation of this is the recent elections in the US. Bush was not
elected by the people, but since his brother is the governor of Florida,
there was a "glitch" and he just happened to get the electoral college
votes, thus guarenteeing his win.
I hope people don't think I'm anti-patriotic. LoL that's really not my
point. I just don't like the way the gov't of my country acts and carries
out it's duty. Power should be taken away from the house and put into our
hands, more of a citizen representation there.. maybe make a "representation
body" so they can do the houses work with retrospect to what the citizens
want? Hope I didn't bore you guys with politics.. it's just a fun issue to
discuss.. to me anyways.
--Bowen--
Apr 11, 2002, 10:42am
I've been thinking about getting some books like that.. be glad to finally
find something to read that won't put me to sleep in 10 minutes ;)..
Hillary is one of the better politicians though?
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3cb528d5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You know, Bill O'Reilly was talking about this in his books. I agree with
> you that politicians should be held accountable to the people. That is
what
> reelections are for. You should read em. :) The Hillary interview is
um...
> well... very funny.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cb506ff$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
are
right
> have
> the
permission
> the
> "god
the
gov't
> is
republic.
> payed
biggest
carries
our
> "representation
citizens
> to
>
>
|
Apr 5, 2002, 6:21pm
There's a rumor going around that AW has lost a lot of money recently. Is
this true? If it is.. all I need to say is, "I told you so."
--Bowen--
Apr 5, 2002, 6:36pm
I mean recently, because of their "business expert's" great decisions.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3cae0a69$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> They've been losing money for a long time now :-P LOL
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cae074e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Is
>
>
|
Apr 6, 2002, 3:20am
http://www.tucows.com/system/preview/212442.html
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3cae72c7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Does anyone know a program that allows passwords to be set on folders
and/or
> files to open them? It doesn't have to be anything special just something
to
> run int he background and do it's intended job. Trust me I HAVE tried
> lookigb but its hard becuase there are so many programs in that category i
> cant find one that does just this.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Zeo Toxion
>
>
|
Apr 6, 2002, 2:56pm
Not all shareware expires ;).
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3caeae5a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thanks but i don't do shareware....thanks anyways
>
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> A message from Zeo Toxion
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cae8582$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> something
category
> i
>
>
|
Apr 6, 2002, 2:58pm
How about this one?
http://www.tucows.com/system/preview/195470.html
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3caeae5a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thanks but i don't do shareware....thanks anyways
>
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> A message from Zeo Toxion
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cae8582$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> something
category
> i
>
>
|
Apr 7, 2002, 7:15pm
Well you can chmod them to read only, hide, and standard..
I used to have the chmod thing for windows.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3cb0350b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I know, but Win32 doesn't have file modes
>
> KAH
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3CAF4947.7ACD487 at oct31.de...
> will
>
>
|
|