|
joeman // User Search
joeman // User Search
Feb 21, 2002, 5:50pm
As Grimm pointed out, it grabs the welcome message, title, and search
keywords from the world server. The search keywords are in +3.3 world
servers only. You cannot pull this information unless a bot enters a world.
Instead of adding some new protocol to have the world server push all of
this to the uniserver, I think AWC made the right choice and made a bot. I
think they just wanted to keep this under cover, until 3.3 came out. But,
you guys just had to ruin it ;). I don't think its that big of a problem,
at least they should have an option to have your world not databased.
-Joe
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c754e66 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> joeman (Joeman at bootdown.com) wrote on Thursday 21 February 2002 02:16 pm:
>
all
>
> Hmm.. but why does it even need to enter the world? Nothing relevant
could
> be pulled from it really. Unless you're grabbing the welcome message or
> something. In which case they should've posted something about this.
>
> -Silenced
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:05pm
No, he's not doing it because he just can! He's doing it so the search
database can be updated. In 3.3 you can go in and type in a keyword.
Because of this bot, worlds matching that keyword will come up. If you ban
this bot, your world will not come up in that search. So, its your choice.
If you don't want your world included in this search, ban that IP. He's not
doing it because he can, he's doing it because its his job.
-Joe
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C754DF3.93267319 at oct31.de...
> If the landlord sometimes came in and took some
> snapshots of your appartement, it would take only
> half a second. I agree, people should have been asked
> or at least informed.
>
> I still think that this IP should be banned from all
> private worlds, but I'm not sure if this would help
> against this ignorance of world owners privacy.
>
> If someone would report abusive contents from a world,
> this would be OK, but doing it just because he can do
> it - I will better not say what I really think about
> this, it could be my last posting here.
>
>
>
> dion wrote:
in
it
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:15pm
Your quick to judge. MrGrimm is doing his job. His JOB, your saying that
he should not do his JOB? This is absurd! Listen, I have been talking with
MrGrimm a little, and a new and improved system is coming where you can
limit the access to your world to the search spider, maybe. There is no
reason for what your doing, soon the search spider will be moved to an AWC
server, you block that, you block anyone working at AWC. I really think
your fighting a war that doesn't need to be fought. Please, just calm down
and collect yourself. Also, stop blaming people for doing their job!
-Joe
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C755143.97611BC7 at oct31.de...
> The right choice would have been :
>
> Make a web page where world owners can post what
> they want to tell visitors.
>
> If a world owner sets bot rights only for certain
> people, this is mandatory, not just a proposal.
> The bot rights entry is like the robots.txt file
> on a web site, or the robots meta tag.
>
> If there is no real and legal reason to break into
> a world, it is illegal, not just bad manners.
> It means, that MrGrimm (like microsoft too often)
> grabs informations in a way he is not supposed to do.
>
>
>
> joeman wrote:
world.
I
But,
problem,
pm:
databasing
or
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:22pm
Well, scratch that idea. AWC said that it will be run on citizen #1.
Still, they aren't stealing any thing, they are just databasing the title,
name, and keywords. If someone comes in, your views are that they are
stealing parts of your world then. All those things are sent to the browser
when it enters. Maybe you should ban everyone that enters? According to
you they are stealing parts of your world. Well?
-Joe
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c75557c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Your quick to judge. MrGrimm is doing his job. His JOB, your saying that
> he should not do his JOB? This is absurd! Listen, I have been talking
with
> MrGrimm a little, and a new and improved system is coming where you can
> limit the access to your world to the search spider, maybe. There is no
> reason for what your doing, soon the search spider will be moved to an AWC
> server, you block that, you block anyone working at AWC. I really think
> your fighting a war that doesn't need to be fought. Please, just calm
down
> and collect yourself. Also, stop blaming people for doing their job!
>
> -Joe
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3C755143.97611BC7 at oct31.de...
> world.
of
bot.
> I
> But,
> problem,
02:16
> pm:
> databasing
relevant
message
> or
this.
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:32pm
I do think that there is a lack of communication. That is AWCs weak point,
AWC to community communication is very small. A letter to the users would
have been good. But, this was only a beta run. Something should have been
done, but it wasnt, like always. Still, I think this is a feature that we
need, or, would like. Its more or less a good thing. I do think that
ananas did a good thing by pointing it out, but he seems so bent on the
death of this thing :(.
-Joe
[View Quote]"aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
news:3c755832 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c754774$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you read any of this at all, you would know its awc bot databasing all
> the worlds for a new 3.3 search thing...
>
> -Joe
|
Regardless of that, Joe, wouldn't it have been prudent (not to mention
polite) to inform world owners at least 24 hours in advance that they were
sending a bot through the worlds, with a brief explanation of the purpose of
doing so?
Come to think of it, here's a good question, has AWC sent email to world
owners (as a group) about anything, ever? Just wondering if there is a
failure to communicate, or just a complete lack of concern about
communicating.
Aine
Feb 21, 2002, 6:35pm
Its not illegal at all! Try to sue him, or the company over it! You would
be laughed out of court. All they are doing is indexing publicly available
information. This is not illegal. If someone wrote down your world name,
title, and or keywords, according to you, they would be doing something
illegal. You have an odd lookout on what's illegal and what's not. Its a
bot running on #1. If someone came into your world with the privs of #1,
would you be just as mad?
-Joe
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C755558.988A7446 at oct31.de...
> I do not blame MrGrimm's person, I blame his role.
> If he was asked to do this by his company, I blame
> the company.
>
> But - "just doing his job" is a poor excuse for doing
> something illegal.
>
>
> joeman wrote:
that
with
AWC
down
news:3C755143.97611BC7 at oct31.de...
search
world
a
all of
bot.
databased.
02:16
relevant
message
this.
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:39pm
It was a beta test. Beta for crying out loud! It didn't touch anything,
just entered, and left. That's all... Nothing was harmed. Your making such
a big thing out of this "Oh! Lets ban grimm for doing his job!" and "That's
illegal!". It was a test of the system. Go ban it if you don't like, but
don't make false claims of something being illegal. Its just like google
coming up and recording your website address, that is not illegal or wrong.
-Joe
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C755705.87A0318F at oct31.de...
> They could have asked the world owners, who want to allow
> it, to set bot rights for one specific special citizen,
> instead of using the master key.
>
> joeman wrote:
point,
would
been
we
all
were
purpose of
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:41pm
Well, would you consider google coming to your site and indexing it illegal
and wrong?
-Joe
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C7557C1.EF7F8518 at oct31.de...
> It is very much a difference how you retrieve your
> informations, with a machine or yourself.
>
> I know examples where a company had to proof, that they
> had hired people to collect informations, that could as
> well have been retrieved automatic.
>
> joeman wrote:
would
available
name,
a
#1,
news:3C755558.988A7446 at oct31.de...
saying
talking
can
is no
an
think
calm
job!
enters
push
made a
out.
a
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:43pm
I know, there *will* be bot restrictions for this too! This is beta! There
is no bot restriction code in it right now, but there will be. You may be
able to set like bot:off in the keywords, and the bot would not index your
world...
-Joe
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C75582C.8A82C805 at oct31.de...
> The Google bot respects bot exclusions.
>
> joeman wrote:
anything,
such
"That's
but
google
wrong.
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 21, 2002, 6:44pm
*will* = most likely, sorry :)
-Joe
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c755bf9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I know, there *will* be bot restrictions for this too! This is beta!
There
> is no bot restriction code in it right now, but there will be. You may be
> able to set like bot:off in the keywords, and the bot would not index your
> world...
>
> -Joe
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3C75582C.8A82C805 at oct31.de...
> anything,
making
> such
> "That's
> but
> google
> wrong.
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 7:36pm
They can be added to the eject list by hand, under world options >
ejection's.
-Joe
[View Quote]"foxmccloud" <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
news:3c756653$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> a écrit dans le message news:
3c75557c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> By the way, not sure about IP bans, but I do know that someone using
priviledges of citizen 1 can not be ejected. I guess they could enter
whatever the ejection etc... (have to test this though)
>
> Fox Mc Cloud
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 7:49pm
I don't think so, adding the ejection by hand will just disconnect all
clients with that IP, regardless if they are using the #1 cit.
-Joe
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c7568c4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> They may be excluded completely from all ejections if they have the awld
> priv on.
>
> -Silenced
>
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c75684d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 8:10pm
They cant delete the ejection if they are ejected. I have ejected people
with AWLD rights plenty of times.
-Joe
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c756c89$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmm, but don't you think that AWCom would've added a feature in so if
you're
> using AWLD's privs that you'd be exempt from that? (but they can just
> delete the ejection anyways)
>
> -Silenced
>
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c756b6a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
awld
using
enter
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 8:49pm
Do you know how ejection works? Here's a brief break down
Right click > eject:
Check if CT, if so, don't eject, else, eject.
World options > eject:
Disconnect user with IP, if connect again in timelimit set, disconnect.
Cit #1 is CT in every world, you cannot eject CTs from right click and
eject. But, if you add them in by hand, the world server will just
disconnect them, regardless if they are CT. That's just how things work...
They cant come back in and remove it, because the world server will just
disconnect them.
-Joe
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c75787e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Uh.. just because you've ejected them doesn't mean they don't have the
> powers to uneject themselves or delete the ejection. This is the Universe
> Admin privilage we're talking about.
>
> They just didn't do anything about it when you did eject them. Most
likely
> from ill-interest.
>
> -Silenced
>
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c75706d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
people
all
the
>
>
>
|
Feb 23, 2002, 4:19pm
I have talked with MrGrimm, that's all the bot does, is index. Your way too
unsecure to have a bot run through and grab your world title, welcome
message, and keywords (3.3). That's all it does, that's all it will ever
do. Stop trying to prove AWC wrong, you will loose. If you don't, just ban
the bot from your world and stop moaning.
-Joe
[View Quote]"aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
news:3c77cd97 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Ok, and you think that's all it was doing, eh?
Seen any proof of that?
|
Aine
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3c77cb00$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> he DOES work for AW and hes the one who did it so i think he would know
what
> he was doing
>
> "aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
> news:3c77c7a4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Pardon me, I meant to say MrGrimm, not GrimReaper.
>
> Aine
>
>
> "aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
> news:3c77c58c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
> news:3c766b76 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL
>
> Principles are VERY worthwhile things to debate about. The fact that AWC
> management apparently doesn't understand the importance of principles,
such
> as integrity and honesty, and continues to do one thing after another
which
> blatantly points out their lack of principles, SHOULD be disturbing to
> anyone here who has money invested in worlds and/or citizenships.
>
> Whether the bot was indexing or not isn't even a salient point in this
> debate, although I would like to point out that no one has actually PROVEN
> what the bot was actually doing or is capable of doing... we only have the
> word of one unidentified GrimReaper who supposedly works for AWC.
>
> Aine
>
>
>
>
>
|
Feb 23, 2002, 4:46pm
Erm, its too early... *insecure
-Joe
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c77dd41$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have talked with MrGrimm, that's all the bot does, is index. Your way
too
> unsecure to have a bot run through and grab your world title, welcome
> message, and keywords (3.3). That's all it does, that's all it will ever
> do. Stop trying to prove AWC wrong, you will loose. If you don't, just
ban
> the bot from your world and stop moaning.
>
> -Joe
>
> "aine" <Aine at DeDanaan.com> wrote in message
> news:3c77cd97 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ok, and you think that's all it was doing, eh?
> Seen any proof of that?
>
> Aine
>
> "zeo toxion" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3c77cb00$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what
program?
AWC
> such
> which
PROVEN
the
>
>
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 8:05pm
Impossible, you cant hex edit to allow tourist enter. You would need to
mess with the login packet to the world, you would need to put a proxy
between the client and server. There are only a few people that know how to
do that. I doubt they did. There is a bug in the browser where if you log
into a world as a cit, then login as a tourist, your a tourist in the world.
Trust me, its more smoke and mirrors, not hacking. Anyway, the browser is
encrypted, doubt someone could get past it.
-Joe
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c7aa0e0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Someone has managed to hex edit the ActiveWorlds client and since your
world
> server is not setup to disallow tourists, he may enter. When the world
> server for 3.3 comes out, it will most likely have something on it to
> prevent this. Of course, someone will find a way to hex that as well :-)
> hehe.
> "steller" <Steller at steller3d.com> wrote in message
> news:3c7a9ffc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> tourists
>
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 10:22pm
Newer world server, that trick only works on older world servers.
-Joe
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3c7ad109$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why do I get booted when I try to switch to tourist in aw world then?
>
> SW Chris
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3C7A9D97.21AA2289 at oct31.de...
> tourists
>
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 10:50pm
No, the world server just doesn't kick you if its an older version, nothing
to do with the client. And, it is changed in 3.3, AW and AWTeen are both on
3.3a servers, and that trick doesn't work in either of them.
-Joe
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c7ad90b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yup, the AW client is set to disallow tourists on entry but doesn't check
> when someone changes to a tourist. That will probably be changed in 3.3.
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c7ad54d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> some
>
>
|
Feb 25, 2002, 11:28pm
All server. The uniserver just wont pass along the host/port of the world
server if there's no tourist enter enabled. Also, in the new world servers
with the protocol update, don't allow you to do the cit to tourist trick
because they can check the universe about the status of tourists being able
to enter. So, the client has no interaction because it can be hacked or run
through a proxy. So, no, the client is not involved with the decision to
not allow tourists to enter worlds. Sorry.
-Joe
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c7add2c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, the client is what doesn't allow you into other worlds when you're a
> tourist :-)
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c7adbe0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> nothing
both
> on
> check
3.3.
> then?
> had
> have
>
>
|
Mar 3, 2002, 2:51pm
H3 us3d l33t h4x0r sp34k j0! Ph34r t3h h4x0r! (ph33r ju = fear you) I
guess :)
-Joe
[View Quote]"binarybud" <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
news:3c825372$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> oh and BTW what the hell does this mean? "ph33r ju". ?
sheeesh
> use english ok? (bait)
>
>
> "sunofsolaris" <thelonesoul at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c821e8c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
had
in
> he
> that
his
false,
on
70's
> ?
> the
DOS
internet)
see
in
> my
> even
will
put
no
> this
backside.
to
> going
you
my
who
you
> or
> happen
a
> elses
>
>
|
Mar 20, 2002, 10:54pm
No, someone hacked the Peacekeeper account, or, a peacekeeper went nuts.
Who knows, but, why would someone move their servers somewhere else because
a password got hacked? Think!
-Joe
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c992b94$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> "dotar sojat" <dotar at ramcell.net> wrote in message
> news:3c982903 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> universe
building
>
> I also have to wonder if this is behind the reason a mysterious bot named
> [M1] appeared on AW GZ and started kicking everyone out (including Customs
> Aide) left and right last night. Hmm.....Why do I have this feeling.....
>
> Patrick Cook
> Mayor - City of Hamsterville
> pchamster at msn.com
> Denver, Colorado
> http://home.talkcity.com/MinivanAve/patrick32/
>
> P.S.: While you guys are at Bill, you guys should SERIOUSLY look at
> UPDATING THE MAPPER at http://mapper.activeworlds.com/ February 2000 is a
> *little* OUT OF DATE, dontcha think????? :-)
>
>
|
Mar 22, 2002, 11:35pm
You need much help.
-Joe
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c9bd1ab at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> To anyone who STILL doubts that Tourist and expired cit builds won't be
> deleted, you should point your browser to 4963N 124E. You will notice
that
> the blue building which was a tourist build I had intended to take over,
> renovate and finish is NOW GONE!!!! A piece of AW history (albeit a
tourist
> build) DELETED by a corproation that says one thing and does something
else
> entirely.
>
> Thank you AWcom - NOT!!!! :-(
>
> You KNEW I had FULL intentions of taking over that build and renovating
and
> finishing it. EVERYONE knew it. Perhaps that's what I get for shooting
my
> mouth off. I dunno. But the fact remains that I had placed signs and
> flagpoles at the north and west end of the building and and adjusted the
> road to go around the build. And YET YOU STILL DELETED IT!!!!
>
> I consider this to be an act of CORPORATE TERRORISM!!!! It will NOT be
> tolerated. While I cannot take any legal action, you can rest assured
that
> the AW Community IS hearing about this as this is also being posted to the
> Community and Worldbuilders groups (Community - AW Support is getting a
copy
> of this via email).
>
> Now, some of you might say "What are you complaining about?? Build it
> somewhere else or build it yourself". The fact remains I had FULL
> INTENTIONS of making it MY building. I just had to merely duplicate it so
I
> can legally bypass Building Inspector. This is something I every
intention
> of starting on when I logged on today only to find that it's NO LONGER
> THERE!!!!!!
>
> As such, and as Mayor of the City Of Hamsterville, I am declaring a State
Of
> Virtual Emergency. This means that if anyone wishes to build a City Hall
> and/or City Jail, there are more than welcome to do so. As for the
present
> site, I think it's only appropriate that ONLY a "virtual vespers
cathedral"
> of some kind to be built there to honor our fallen cits as this happens.
A
> 2nd Memorial build can also be built there as well. Although at this
point
> in time, I am open to suggestions.
>
> The signs shall remain the way they are and the flagpoles shall remain in
> place and the road will remain in its present state until something more
> definitive is decided. At this point in time, I'm not really in much of a
> mood for speculation as to what might happen. I will however add a
mailbox
> where one can drop me a line via email.
>
> I'm sure anyone has a build of any kind anywhere near 4963N 124E is no
doubt
> deeply saddened by this TRAGIC loss of AW history. That building was a
WORK
> OF ART. All it needed was someone to come along to finish it.
>
> I shall be on AW GZ if anyone wishes to pass along their condolences. You
> can telegram me if you don't find me on AW GZ.
>
> Once again, a tourist build at 4963N 124E has been deleted, and I have
> little doubt (VERY little) that similar builds in other towns were also
> lost. My sympathies go out to those other town which also lost similar
> builds.
>
> If you think I'm just being irrational (looking more towards Brant than
> anyone else) - THINK AGAIN!!!! It's happened in Hamsterville and it CAN
> happen (if it hasn't already) to your town as well.
>
> In the meantime...I look forward to youn replies and/or telegrams (please
no
> tar, feathers or flames at me. A polite message will do the trick just as
> effectively).
>
> Respectfully Posted,
>
> Patrick Cook
> Mayor - City Of Hamsterville
> pchamster at msn.com
> Denver, Colorado
> http://home.talkcity.com/MinivanAve/patrick32/
>
>
>
|
May 14, 2002, 10:08pm
There is an inbrowser editor for the terrain, but he's asking for one that
will load terrain from a DEM. There's nothing in browser for that. I
suppose it wouldn't be very hard to write a bot to do it, like Rolands.
Maybe he should add it to the SDK site ask an example? :)
-Joe
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:Xns920EF0A3F4ED6kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> "carlbanks" <Virtualcarlbanks at hotmail.com> wrote in news:3ce16fcf$1
> at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
> I think it's something integrated into the browser? maybe not, haven't
> heard any detailed info about this since Tech Talks stopped nearly half a
> year ago :-(( I'm planning to write a bot for terrains based on
heightmaps,
> my prefered method of defining landscapes.
>
> KAH
|
May 16, 2002, 7:48pm
I know that it can be done both ways :).
-Joe
[View Quote]"lysimachus" <BoBo1186 at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3ce2ca60$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> From what I read, the terrain can be manipulated via the browser and
> bots using new SDK functions. But who knows?
>
> joeman <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3ce1a6e7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
half
> a
>
>
|
May 16, 2002, 11:52pm
The encryption is based off of the computers harddisk serial I believe. If
someone were to steal your 3.2 aworld.ini and use it on another harddisk
with a different serial, it should not work. Although, the serial may not
even be the key. I heard something about the serial somewhere, and I
believe that this is what its for. I doubt you'll get much out of Roland
about how the key is generated ;).
-Joe
[View Quote]"anduin" <anduin at NOSPAM.centercom.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ce43f36 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hey,
>
>
> Well, I have 2 other PC's connected to this one. But I also have Windows
XP
> and had two installations of ActiveWorlds 3.2 with seperate cache's,
> contacts, aworld.ini and everything. Windows XP allows you to do such if
you
> know how without making both programs screw up ;)
>
> That may explain though, why the aworld.ini file worked?
> I guess it just doesn't work on seperate computers and hard drives eh?
Good
> enough :)
>
> --
> Anduin
> Citizen 317281
> http://www.anduin-lothario.com
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9210C18E730F9kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
>
>
|
May 19, 2002, 2:48pm
The only problem is, some users use modems to connect to AW, so NIC serials
are out of the question. :)
-Joe
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3ce4a1b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Its a common solution. The Rational suites use that or the NIC serial
> number for the same purposes on their node-locked licenses. If its good
> enough for software retailing in the 10's of thousands of dollars, its
must
> be reasonably safe.
>
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3ce46263 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If
not
Roland
Windows
if
well.
password.
> so
>
>
|
May 19, 2002, 2:45pm
Well, yes and no. Yes, you will be able to log in to your 3.2 world with
the 3.3 SDK. But, no, you will not be able to use global mode in your 3.2
world.
-Joe
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <zeo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3ce5bec9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Quick question not in reply to any particular post.
>
> Does the 3.3 SDK only work in 3.3 worlds does it not? Can I use for
example
> the global mode in my 3.2 world server and be able to command in in 3.2
> browser?
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> A message from Zeo Toxion
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
> news:3ce4516b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
one
few
to
minutes
> new
> years
that
> mode,"
> almost
> would
> the
citizens"
> as
return
> to
>
>
|
May 26, 2002, 2:09pm
Oh come on! Its a serial number from an area on your computer hashed.
Hashes cannot be reversed, so there are no worries. I doubt anyone could
create some sort of virus that would make your computer melt, or take over
the world from a serial number on your computer. I think your over reacting
a lot. What about the people with static IP addresses? That's a static
with their computer like serials are. So, the line of thinking that your on
suggests that AW is already spyware. I think you need to find something else
to bitch about, this is nothing big.
-Joe
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3cf0eb3c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I Dont want anyone to be able to uniquly ID my computer nomatter what..
its
> things like that, that end up as computer specific viruses etc.
>
>
>
|
May 27, 2002, 1:55pm
Hmmm, well... Not all of us have P4's, so its not the P4 ident. You will
have to take into account all of the different pieces of hardware that are
on a machine. My guess is that its a combination of a lot of things. It
would be trivial to change it though, because of ejection based on citizen
numbers. Most of us don't have more than one or two accounts, so it would
be easy to keep the offending person out of your world for good. Sure, if
one wanted to get back into a world after ejection, it would be easy. But,
one would be ejected again quickly after they were found out. Stop trying
to be the next ubahh4xX0r and just use AW like a normal person.
-Joe
[View Quote]"glitter bug" <seanderson at iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:3cf1e1ae at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What about those of us who have multiple computers, or systems with
multiple
> CPUs which can be singularly disabled or partitions with more than one OS
> ... it won't take me (or others equally equipped) long to figure out what
> number they're using as the unique ID by a simple process of elimination.
> Once it becomes public knowledge it'll be just as simple to change as the
> IP.
>
> My guess by the "although not all" is it'll be the P4 ident or as OS ident
>
> Glitter
>
> zeo toxion <zeo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3cf133a1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
> is
> type
> from
>
>
|
|