|
|
>>> Posting in HTML(?) <<< (Community)
>>> Posting in HTML(?) <<< // Community
Nov 16, 2000, 12:12am
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_015F_01C04F3C.D5BAE000
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Eep, this is posted especially for you :-)
Why is it that some people have a problem with posting in HTML? Just =
wondering, didn't want to start a fight or anything.
--=20
- Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
"Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
____________________________________________________________
------=_NextPart_000_015F_01C04F3C.D5BAE000
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" size=3D1>Eep, this is posted =
especially for you=20
:-)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" size=3D1>Why is it that some people =
have a problem=20
with posting in HTML? Just wondering, didn't want to start a fight or=20
anything.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" size=3D1><BR>-- <BR>- Tony56 (aka=20
Chandler56)<BR>"Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To=20
Believe!"<BR>____________________________________________________________=
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_015F_01C04F3C.D5BAE000--
Nov 16, 2000, 1:01am
Maybe because it's an unnecessary waste of time to download it. Kinda like this reply. : )
crey
[View Quote]"tony56" <chandler56 at mail.com> wrote in message news:3a134291 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Eep, this is posted especially for you :-)
|
Why is it that some people have a problem with posting in HTML? Just wondering, didn't want to start a fight or anything.
--
- Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
"Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
____________________________________________________________
Nov 16, 2000, 1:13am
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
i hate html it takes 3 times to download and sometimes there are 50 messages
to download
<br>
[View Quote]<p>crey wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Maybe because it's an unnecessary waste of time to
download it. Kinda like this reply. : )
<p>crey
<p>"tony56" <chandler56 at mail.com> wrote in message <a href="news:3a134291 at server1.Activeworlds.com">news:3a134291 at server1.Activeworlds.com</a>...
<br>Eep, this is posted especially for you :-)
<p>Why is it that some people have a problem with posting in HTML? Just
wondering, didn't want to start a fight or anything.
<p>--
<br>- Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
<br>"Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
<br>____________________________________________________________</blockquote>
</html>
|
Nov 16, 2000, 1:46am
Umm... then why did you post a reply to this in HTML format? *boggle*
[View Quote]the derek wrote:
>
> i hate html it takes 3 times to download and sometimes there are 50
> messages to download
>
>
> crey wrote:
>
|
--
Goober King
Pointing out the obvious every chance he gets...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Nov 16, 2000, 2:18am
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
its in html? lol well that mustve been because the first message was in
html... oh well
[View Quote]<p>goober king wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Umm... then why did you post a reply to this in HTML
format? *boggle*
<p>the derek wrote:
<br>>
<br>> i hate html it takes 3 times to download and sometimes there are
50
<br>> messages to download
<br>>
<br>>
<br>> crey wrote:
<br>>
<br>> > Maybe because it's an unnecessary waste of time to download it.
<br>> > Kinda like this reply. : )
<br>> >
<br>> > crey
<br>> >
<br>> > "tony56" <chandler56 at mail.com> wrote in message
<br>> > <a href="news:3a134291 at server1.Activeworlds.com">news:3a134291 at server1.Activeworlds.com</a>...
<br>> > Eep, this is posted especially for you :-)
<br>> >
<br>> > Why is it that some people have a problem with posting in HTML?
Just
<br>> > wondering, didn't want to start a fight or anything.
<br>> >
<br>> > --
<br>> > - Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
<br>> > "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
<br>> > ____________________________________________________________
<p>--
<br>Goober King
<br>Pointing out the obvious every chance he gets...
<br>rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu</blockquote>
</html>
|
Nov 16, 2000, 4:45am
He didn't. Note his message line amount (19) compared to Tony56's (45).
[View Quote]
> Umm... then why did you post a reply to this in HTML format? *boggle*
>
[View Quote]
Nov 16, 2000, 1:09pm
If you really want do down-size the message stop including the original
message in the reply.
Nov 16, 2000, 2:30pm
At LEAST the message you are replying to (or parts of it) should be quoted in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what the hell it is you're referring to.
HTML posts are just annoyingly large and even more annoying when idiots like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his incompetence alone...
This is one of the reasons I rip on clueless newbies so much. If they can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
[View Quote]
> If you really want do down-size the message stop including the original
> message in the reply.
Nov 16, 2000, 8:30pm
Well thank you all for your opinions. I will stop posting in HTML.
BTW Eep, since you seem to me Mr.Suggestion, what should I wrap text at? Its
currently set at 76.
--
- Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
"Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
____________________________________________________________
[View Quote]eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A140579.85456B9F at tnlc.com...
> At LEAST the message you are replying to (or parts of it) should be quoted
in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news
servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to
expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now
defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's
annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what
the hell it is you're referring to.
>
> HTML posts are just annoyingly large and even more annoying when idiots
like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original
message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies
anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his
incompetence alone...
>
> This is one of the reasons I rip on clueless newbies so much. If they
can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and
display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for
example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the
first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down
Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and
now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will
continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively
use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the
process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's
EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should
know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
>
> bambam wrote:
>
>
|
Nov 16, 2000, 10:17pm
72 or less seems to work pretty well
[View Quote]
> Well thank you all for your opinions. I will stop posting in HTML.
> BTW Eep, since you seem to me Mr.Suggestion, what should I wrap text at? Its
> currently set at 76.
>
> --
> - Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
> "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
> ____________________________________________________________
[View Quote]> eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A140579.85456B9F at tnlc.com...
> in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news
> servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to
> expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now
> defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's
> annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what
> the hell it is you're referring to.
> like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original
> message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies
> anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his
> incompetence alone...
> can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and
> display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for
> example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the
> first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down
> Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and
> now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will
> continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively
> use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the
> process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's
> EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should
> know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
|
Nov 17, 2000, 8:51am
<shrug> I don't force line lengths (well, only the highest possible limit since Netscape Messenger can't disable them). http://tnlc.com/eep/wordwrap.html to learn why.
[View Quote]
> Well thank you all for your opinions. I will stop posting in HTML.
> BTW Eep, since you seem to me Mr.Suggestion, what should I wrap text at? Its
> currently set at 76.
>
[View Quote]> eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A140579.85456B9F at tnlc.com...
> in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news
> servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to
> expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now
> defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's
> annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what
> the hell it is you're referring to.
> like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original
> message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies
> anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his
> incompetence alone...
> can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and
> display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for
> example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the
> first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down
> Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and
> now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will
> continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively
> use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the
> process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's
> EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should
> know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
|
Nov 17, 2000, 11:12am
There is a related post by Technozeus at the Beta NG [April 13 2000, Subject: Re: quoted text (was Re: What is ras?)]. The only way to increase line length beyond 132 chars in OE or Outlook is to go through registry.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{A12A0416-9869-43FB-9384-9038B2DF16B7}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0\News\Message Plain Character Line Wrap
Right click/Modify. Value 7fff (32767 chars) seems to work best. You can do the same for email if you want in the \mail key.
Baron
[View Quote]"tony56" <chandler56 at mail.com> wrote in message news:3a145ff0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Well thank you all for your opinions. I will stop posting in HTML.
BTW Eep, since you seem to me Mr.Suggestion, what should I wrap text at? Its currently set at 76.
|
--
- Tony56 (aka Chandler56)
"Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!"
____________________________________________________________
[View Quote]eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A140579.85456B9F at tnlc.com...
> At LEAST the message you are replying to (or parts of it) should be quoted in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what the hell it is you're referring to.
>
> HTML posts are just annoyingly large and even more annoying when idiots like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his incompetence alone...
>
> This is one of the reasons I rip on clueless newbies so much. If they can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
>
> bambam wrote:
>
>
|
Nov 17, 2000, 2:24pm
Who they hell does this idiot thinks he his????? I thinkI might have to take a suggestion and filter this bafooon!
I cant believe the ignorance and gall to spew this crap.
[View Quote]
> At LEAST the message you are replying to (or parts of it) should be quoted in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what the hell it is you're referring to.
>
> HTML posts are just annoyingly large and even more annoying when idiots like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his incompetence alone...
>
> This is one of the reasons I rip on clueless newbies so much. If they can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
>
[View Quote]
--
Chris Waddell
dmonix at home.com
www.dmonix.net
Nov 17, 2000, 3:27pm
Hey, the guy has a point.
For example, there's a post in the SDK newgroup that is HTML (Re:Stumped(was
Re: need a little help please)) and its 11K !!!! - and its just cut/pasted
VB code from the guy's bot.
Grims
[View Quote]zero <dmonix at home.com> wrote in message news:3A1555F4.73EE156D at home.com...
> Who they hell does this idiot thinks he his????? I thinkI might have to
take a suggestion and filter this bafooon!
> I cant believe the ignorance and gall to spew this crap.
>
> eep wrote:
>
quoted in your reply. The referred-to message isn't always available on news
servers (most have short expiration dates, although AW's don't seem to
expire, but AWCI is flaky in its archiving, as is evidenced by the now
defunct "discussion" and "awcommunity" newsgroups. At any rate, it's
annoying having to click on the message you're replying to just to see what
the hell it is you're referring to.
like Tony56 reply with a single line. His posts tend to exceed the original
message's size by 5 times which is just ridiculous for his worthless replies
anyway. I'm almost to the point of filtering for that fact of his
incompetence alone...
can't take the time to learn about offsets between download time and
display, and learn how to use their programs (like enabling wordwrap, for
example), they shouldn't be using the Net, software, or computers in the
first place. This is one of the problems I have with Microsoft dumbing down
Windows so clueless idiots can attempt to use it (My this and My that, and
now their lame misspelling of WinME as WinMe--lame-ass bullshit). I will
continue to rip on people until they learn how to properly and effectively
use their computers and not annoy the shit out of me and other people in the
process. And don't even THINK of mentioning my line length because it's
EASILY fixed by simple enabling wordwrap, which any computer user should
know how to do anyway--PERIOD.
original
>
> --
> Chris Waddell
> dmonix at home.com
> www.dmonix.net
>
>
|
Nov 18, 2000, 12:28am
Its the insults and derogatory text. Its completely uncalled for.
Just because someone doesn't have the PC knowledge of another, doesnt mean they
should be cut into peices.
If thats ok.. then ppl like Eep should be sodomised by large grizzly bears.
and then hacked up in to lil peices and placed in tubes and shot into space
towards the sun.
Though Eeps brain should be kept and cut into urinal pucks for men to urinate on
in bathrooms.
>
--
Chris Waddell
dmonix at home.com
www.dmonix.net
Nov 18, 2000, 12:36am
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
lmao these newsgroups...i swear you people are always at each others throats..or
brains should i say
[View Quote]<p>zero wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Its the insults and derogatory text. Its completely
uncalled for.
<br>Just because someone doesn't have the PC knowledge of another, doesnt
mean they
<br>should be cut into peices.
<br>If thats ok.. then ppl like Eep should be sodomised by large grizzly
bears.
<br>and then hacked up in to lil peices and placed in tubes and shot into
space
<br>towards the sun.
<br>Though Eeps brain should be kept and cut into urinal pucks for men
to urinate on
<br>in bathrooms.
<p>>
<p>--
<br>Chris Waddell
<br>dmonix at home.com
<br>www.dmonix.net</blockquote>
</html>
|
Nov 18, 2000, 1:17am
Welcome to the insanity, my friend. :} *cackle*
Seriously, though, it's usually just everyone vs. Eep, since he seems to
enjoy bringing this sort of stuff on himself. Maybe he's masochistic or
something. :)
[View Quote]the derek wrote:
>
> lmao these newsgroups...i swear you people are always at each others
> throats..or brains should i say
>
> zero wrote:
>
|
--
Goober King
Thinks Eep would make a pretty interesting social case study...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Nov 18, 2000, 6:30am
I don't enjoy it. Unfortunately, most people don't always understand why I do the things I do until MUCH later (if at all) after MUCH bickering. This is one reason why people should not TRY to understand what I do and simply accept it and move on. I sure as fuck don't try to understand everyone who posts here. Some, like Derek, are completely transparent which is why I immediately rip on them for their incompetence.
[View Quote]
> Welcome to the insanity, my friend. :} *cackle*
>
> Seriously, though, it's usually just everyone vs. Eep, since he seems to
> enjoy bringing this sort of stuff on himself. Maybe he's masochistic or
> something. :)
>
[View Quote]
Nov 18, 2000, 6:34am
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
what the hell is your problem and why the hell am i in all your messages
all of a sudden now? god i hope your not falling in love with me LOL!!!!
then id have to kill myself and go to hell
[View Quote]<p>eep wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I don't enjoy it. Unfortunately, most people don't
always understand why I do the things I do until MUCH later (if at all)
after MUCH bickering. This is one reason why people should not TRY to understand
what I do and simply accept it and move on. I sure as fuck don't try to
understand everyone who posts here. Some, like Derek, are completely transparent
which is why I immediately rip on them for their incompetence.
<p>goober king wrote:
<p>> Welcome to the insanity, my friend. :} *cackle*
<br>>
<br>> Seriously, though, it's usually just everyone vs. Eep, since he seems
to
<br>> enjoy bringing this sort of stuff on himself. Maybe he's masochistic
or
<br>> something. :)
<br>>
<br>> the derek wrote:
<br>> >
<br>> > lmao these newsgroups...i swear you people are always at each others
<br>> > throats..or brains should i say
<br>> >
<br>> > zero wrote:
<br>> >
<br>> > > Its the insults and derogatory text. Its completely uncalled
for.
<br>> > > Just because someone doesn't have the PC knowledge of another,
<br>> > > doesnt mean they
<br>> > > should be cut into peices.
<br>> > > If thats ok.. then ppl like Eep should be sodomised by large
grizzly
<br>> > > bears.
<br>> > > and then hacked up in to lil peices and placed in tubes and shot
<br>> > > into space
<br>> > > towards the sun.
<br>> > > Though Eeps brain should be kept and cut into urinal pucks for
men
<br>> > > to urinate on
<br>> > > in bathrooms.</blockquote>
</html>
|
Nov 18, 2000, 10:44am
You're simply the latest example of incompetence I've run across, which is nothing to feel flattered about. However, please feel free to kill yourself at your earliest convienence. :)
[View Quote]
> what the hell is your problem and why the hell am i in all your messages all of a sudden now? god i hope your not falling in love with me LOL!!!! then id have to kill myself and go to hell
>
[View Quote]
Nov 18, 2000, 6:52pm
Eep, sorry to have to point this out to you, but you are as bad as the rest
of us as just walking away from points like this.
All it achieves is losing the original point on the post (assuming there was
one lol)
Grims
[View Quote]eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A1673BC.D6106B4F at tnlc.com...
> You're simply the latest example of incompetence I've run across, which is
nothing to feel flattered about. However, please feel free to kill yourself
at your earliest convienence. :)
>
> the derek wrote:
>
all of a sudden now? god i hope your not falling in love with me LOL!!!!
then id have to kill myself and go to hell
why I do the things I do until MUCH later (if at all) after MUCH bickering.
This is one reason why people should not TRY to understand what I do and
simply accept it and move on. I sure as fuck don't try to understand
everyone who posts here. Some, like Derek, are completely transparent which
is why I immediately rip on them for their incompetence.
to
or
others
grizzly
men
>
|
Nov 18, 2000, 11:42pm
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
EEEP WOULKD YOU STOP THIS YOURE ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT HOW THINGS ARE OFF
TOPIC HOW IS IT THAT YOU ALWAYS SEEM TO TURN EVERY THREAD INTO EVERYONE
FUCKING CUSSING YOU OUT????
[View Quote]<p>grimble wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Eep, sorry to have to point this out to you, but
you are as bad as the rest
<br>of us as just walking away from points like this.
<p>All it achieves is losing the original point on the post (assuming there
was
<br>one lol)
<p>Grims
<p>eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message <a href="news:3A1673BC.D6106B4F at tnlc.com">news:3A1673BC.D6106B4F at tnlc.com</a>...
<br>> You're simply the latest example of incompetence I've run across,
which is
<br>nothing to feel flattered about. However, please feel free to kill
yourself
<br>at your earliest convienence. :)
<br>>
<br>> the derek wrote:
<br>>
<br>> > what the hell is your problem and why the hell am i in all your
messages
<br>all of a sudden now? god i hope your not falling in love with me LOL!!!!
<br>then id have to kill myself and go to hell
<br>> >
<br>> > eep wrote:
<br>> >
<br>> >> I don't enjoy it. Unfortunately, most people don't always understand
<br>why I do the things I do until MUCH later (if at all) after MUCH bickering.
<br>This is one reason why people should not TRY to understand what I do
and
<br>simply accept it and move on. I sure as fuck don't try to understand
<br>everyone who posts here. Some, like Derek, are completely transparent
which
<br>is why I immediately rip on them for their incompetence.
<br>> >>
<br>> >> goober king wrote:
<br>> >>
<br>> >> > Welcome to the insanity, my friend. :} *cackle*
<br>> >> >
<br>> >> > Seriously, though, it's usually just everyone vs. Eep, since
he seems
<br>to
<br>> >> > enjoy bringing this sort of stuff on himself. Maybe he's masochistic
<br>or
<br>> >> > something. :)
<br>> >> >
<br>> >> > the derek wrote:
<br>> >> > >
<br>> >> > > lmao these newsgroups...i swear you people are always at each
<br>others
<br>> >> > > throats..or brains should i say
<br>> >> > >
<br>> >> > > zero wrote:
<br>> >> > >
<br>> >> > > > Its the insults and derogatory text. Its completely uncalled
for.
<br>> >> > > > Just because someone doesn't have the PC knowledge of another,
<br>> >> > > > doesnt mean they
<br>> >> > > > should be cut into peices.
<br>> >> > > > If thats ok.. then ppl like Eep should be sodomised by large
<br>grizzly
<br>> >> > > > bears.
<br>> >> > > > and then hacked up in to lil peices and placed in tubes
and shot
<br>> >> > > > into space
<br>> >> > > > towards the sun.
<br>> >> > > > Though Eeps brain should be kept and cut into urinal pucks
for
<br>men
<br>> >> > > > to urinate on
<br>> >> > > > in bathrooms.
<br>> >
<br>></blockquote>
</html>
|
Nov 18, 2000, 11:55pm
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
ok me calm down now me cross out bad words yah
[View Quote]<p>the derek wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>EEEP WOULKD YOU STOP THIS YOURE ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT
HOW THINGS ARE OFF TOPIC HOW IS IT THAT YOU ALWAYS SEEM TO TURN EVERY THREAD
INTO EVERYONE <strike>FUCKING</strike> CUSSING YOU OUT????
<p>grimble wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Eep, sorry to have to point this out to you, but
you are as bad as the rest
<br>of us as just walking away from points like this.
<p>All it achieves is losing the original point on the post (assuming there
was
<br>one lol)
<p>Grims
<p>eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message <a href="news:3A1673BC.D6106B4F at tnlc.com">news:3A1673BC.D6106B4F at tnlc.com</a>...
<br>> You're simply the latest example of incompetence I've run across,
which is
<br>nothing to feel flattered about. However, please feel free to kill
yourself
<br>at your earliest convienence. :)
<br>>
<br>> the derek wrote:
<br>>
<br>> > what the hell is your problem and why the hell am i in all your
messages
<br>all of a sudden now? god i hope your not falling in love with me LOL!!!!
<br>then id have to kill myself and go to hell
<br>> >
<br>> > eep wrote:
<br>> >
<br>> >> I don't enjoy it. Unfortunately, most people don't always understand
<br>why I do the things I do until MUCH later (if at all) after MUCH bickering.
<br>This is one reason why people should not TRY to understand what I do
and
<br>simply accept it and move on. I sure as fuck don't try to understand
<br>everyone who posts here. Some, like Derek, are completely transparent
which
<br>is why I immediately rip on them for their incompetence.
<br>> >>
<br>> >> goober king wrote:
<br>> >>
<br>> >> > Welcome to the insanity, my friend. :} *cackle*
<br>> >> >
<br>> >> > Seriously, though, it's usually just everyone vs. Eep, since
he seems
<br>to
<br>> >> > enjoy bringing this sort of stuff on himself. Maybe he's masochistic
<br>or
<br>> >> > something. :)
<br>> >> >
<br>> >> > the derek wrote:
<br>> >> > >
<br>> >> > > lmao these newsgroups...i swear you people are always at each
<br>others
<br>> >> > > throats..or brains should i say
<br>> >> > >
<br>> >> > > zero wrote:
<br>> >> > >
<br>> >> > > > Its the insults and derogatory text. Its completely uncalled
for.
<br>> >> > > > Just because someone doesn't have the PC knowledge of another,
<br>> >> > > > doesnt mean they
<br>> >> > > > should be cut into peices.
<br>> >> > > > If thats ok.. then ppl like Eep should be sodomised by large
<br>grizzly
<br>> >> > > > bears.
<br>> >> > > > and then hacked up in to lil peices and placed in tubes
and shot
<br>> >> > > > into space
<br>> >> > > > towards the sun.
<br>> >> > > > Though Eeps brain should be kept and cut into urinal pucks
for
<br>men
<br>> >> > > > to urinate on
<br>> >> > > > in bathrooms.
<br>> >
<br>></blockquote>
</blockquote>
|
<p><br>tht better now?
<br>yah</html>
Nov 19, 2000, 8:25am
It would be much better if you didn't use those words in the first place.
Grims
[View Quote]the derek <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3A172D79.1029F78B at yahoo.com...
|
ok me calm down now me cross out bad words yah
Nov 19, 2000, 11:02am
Either chill or leave, take your pick. He only says things are off topic
when they are, which they frequently have been since you arrived. Now I
quote the lame community charter at the top of this group...
"News.activeworlds.com/community newsgroup is for anyone who is
interested in AW and who can follow Usenet newsgroup netiquette, basic
rules of polite human interaction" Granted, this group isn't moderated
anymore, but I don't think cussing people out follows basic rules of
polite human interaction. This may sound a little eep-like but congrats
on the filter.
--
Wing
[View Quote]
> EEEP WOULKD YOU STOP THIS YOURE ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT HOW THINGS ARE
> OFF TOPIC HOW IS IT THAT YOU ALWAYS SEEM TO TURN EVERY THREAD INTO
> EVERYONE FUCKING CUSSING YOU OUT????
>
[View Quote]
Nov 19, 2000, 11:29am
I'm not the one who incompetently posted an off-topic introductory message to the beta newsgroup, Grimble. Stop missing this BASIC, SIMPLE, CRUCIAL point, please. The POINT of my response is to PREVENT other dimwitted twits from doing the same. Duh. Stop making a fucking federal case out of this and simply accept that his post IS off-topic and lay off ME for simply pointing out the obvious to someone so clueless.
[View Quote]
> Eep, sorry to have to point this out to you, but you are as bad as the rest
> of us as just walking away from points like this.
>
> All it achieves is losing the original point on the post (assuming there was
> one lol)
>
[View Quote]> eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A1673BC.D6106B4F at tnlc.com...
> nothing to feel flattered about. However, please feel free to kill yourself
> at your earliest convienence. :)
> all of a sudden now? god i hope your not falling in love with me LOL!!!!
> then id have to kill myself and go to hell
> why I do the things I do until MUCH later (if at all) after MUCH bickering.
> This is one reason why people should not TRY to understand what I do and
> simply accept it and move on. I sure as fuck don't try to understand
> everyone who posts here. Some, like Derek, are completely transparent which
> is why I immediately rip on them for their incompetence.
> to
> or
> others
> grizzly
> men
|
Nov 19, 2000, 11:30am
weak-willed minds :)
[View Quote]
> EEEP WOULKD YOU STOP THIS YOURE ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT HOW THINGS ARE OFF TOPIC HOW IS IT THAT YOU ALWAYS SEEM TO TURN EVERY THREAD INTO EVERYONE FUCKING CUSSING YOU OUT????
>
[View Quote]
Nov 19, 2000, 2:21pm
Ooohh...... Eep.
I was just levelling the playing field a bit. You made the "off-topic" point
in your FIRST post on this thread.
Don't start on me "sport", because I make sure now that I am not picking on,
targeting or being unfair (in my view) to YOU. All my posts in response to
yours are exactly what I would say to your face. You are NOT being picked on
here.
WAKE UP MAN !
[View Quote]eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A17CF28.AD618B5F at tnlc.com...
> I'm not the one who incompetently posted an off-topic introductory message
to the beta newsgroup, Grimble. Stop missing this BASIC, SIMPLE, CRUCIAL
point, please. The POINT of my response is to PREVENT other dimwitted twits
from doing the same. Duh. Stop making a fucking federal case out of this and
simply accept that his post IS off-topic and lay off ME for simply pointing
out the obvious to someone so clueless.
>
> grimble wrote:
>
rest
was
which is
yourself
messages
understand
bickering.
which
seems
masochistic
for.
another,
shot
for
>
|
Nov 19, 2000, 8:36pm
Uh huh, then why the CONSTANT barrage of attacks against why I do this or why I do that, hmm? Shut up. You're just like all the rest of the idiots who knee-jerk respond against me. I'm almost getting to the point where I'll simply ignore such responses...almost...keep it up and you'll be thrown in my filter along with all the other twits.
[View Quote]
> Ooohh...... Eep.
>
> I was just levelling the playing field a bit. You made the "off-topic" point
> in your FIRST post on this thread.
>
> Don't start on me "sport", because I make sure now that I am not picking on,
> targeting or being unfair (in my view) to YOU. All my posts in response to
> yours are exactly what I would say to your face. You are NOT being picked on
> here.
>
> WAKE UP MAN !
>
[View Quote]> eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3A17CF28.AD618B5F at tnlc.com...
> to the beta newsgroup, Grimble. Stop missing this BASIC, SIMPLE, CRUCIAL
> point, please. The POINT of my response is to PREVENT other dimwitted twits
> from doing the same. Duh. Stop making a fucking federal case out of this and
> simply accept that his post IS off-topic and lay off ME for simply pointing
> out the obvious to someone so clueless.
|
|
