|
|
Voice (Wishlist)
Voice // Wishlist
May 31, 2005, 9:17pm
There should be a voice kind of thing like There.com where u just talk into
ur mic and theres a setting either hands free where u just talk or a push to
talk kind of thing so then you dont have to type all the time
May 31, 2005, 9:34pm
Thats coming on 4.1, either that or all the strong rumors were false
But we don't want to make a copy of There
[View Quote]Justin Eyres wrote:
> There should be a voice kind of thing like There.com where u just talk into
> ur mic and theres a setting either hands free where u just talk or a push to
> talk kind of thing so then you dont have to type all the time
>
>
|
Jun 1, 2005, 4:36am
One has to wonder why we're all on 3.6 (567) if there's already a 4.1? I can
see alpha or beta testing it but that's alot of versions off from what we
currently have isn't it??? Shouldn't we be on 4.0 if 4.1 is in alpha/beta?
What's in 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 4.0 ... not to mention all the subbuilds of
those like 568, 569, 570 ... heck we'll never see 4.1 at this rate LOL
LNH
[View Quote]"Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
news:429cf490$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thats coming on 4.1, either that or all the strong rumors were false
> But we don't want to make a copy of There
>
> Justin Eyres wrote:
|
Jun 1, 2005, 8:43am
Regarding software version numbering, I believe the convention is to
increment the number left of the decimal point when enhancements are made
and the number right of the decimal point when bugs are fixed.
If that's true with AW then we could easily skip from 3.6 to 4.1, or,
conversely, even have a v3.10, v3.11, etc.
Jim1
[View Quote]"Lady NightHawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:429d5789 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> One has to wonder why we're all on 3.6 (567) if there's already a 4.1? I
> can see alpha or beta testing it but that's alot of versions off from what
> we currently have isn't it??? Shouldn't we be on 4.0 if 4.1 is in
> alpha/beta? What's in 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 4.0 ... not to mention all the
> subbuilds of those like 568, 569, 570 ... heck we'll never see 4.1 at this
> rate LOL
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> "Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
> news:429cf490$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
|
Jun 1, 2005, 10:26am
actually, i think with AW, the number on the left (i.e:3) used to symbolise
the renderware version? not too sure though.
-SWE
[View Quote]"Jim1" <JimMoore2 at Cox.net> wrote in message
news:429d914b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Regarding software version numbering, I believe the convention is to
> increment the number left of the decimal point when enhancements are made
> and the number right of the decimal point when bugs are fixed.
>
> If that's true with AW then we could easily skip from 3.6 to 4.1, or,
> conversely, even have a v3.10, v3.11, etc.
>
>
> Jim1
>
|
Jun 1, 2005, 5:09pm
[View Quote]SWE wrote:
> actually, i think with AW, the number on the left (i.e:3) used to symbolise
> the renderware version? not too sure though.
>
> -SWE
>
> "Jim1" <JimMoore2 at Cox.net> wrote in message
> news:429d914b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
I wouldn't mind if they had a non-attached program to AW yet it stilled
utilized AW as is. Like if they allowed hosts to host them, and it
connects to the AW Uni database, and checks if they're a real citizen,
get on, and whatever. Would be nice.
Jun 1, 2005, 6:13pm
YEAH!!
Add a function to the SDK where it can log a bot in as an actual citizen
(i.e. name/pass) and be able to access cit-specific stuff (grams, cit
settings etc). Then let all the genius programmers take it from there.
-=LtB=-
[View Quote]"TheMask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:429e07ff$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> SWE wrote:
>
> I wouldn't mind if they had a non-attached program to AW yet it stilled
> utilized AW as is. Like if they allowed hosts to host them, and it
> connects to the AW Uni database, and checks if they're a real citizen, get
> on, and whatever. Would be nice.
|
Jun 1, 2005, 6:21pm
but thats how you end up with object path passwords easily being stolen, as
well as bots spamming people in places were bots aren't allowed, and some
other things.
-SWE
[View Quote]"LtBrenton" <uaf_brenton at concsols.com> wrote in message
news:429e16e3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> YEAH!!
>
> Add a function to the SDK where it can log a bot in as an actual citizen
> (i.e. name/pass) and be able to access cit-specific stuff (grams, cit
> settings etc). Then let all the genius programmers take it from there.
>
>
> -=LtB=-
>
|
Jun 1, 2005, 7:56pm
[View Quote]SWE wrote:
> but thats how you end up with object path passwords easily being stolen, as
> well as bots spamming people in places were bots aren't allowed, and some
> other things.
>
> -SWE
>
>
>
> "LtBrenton" <uaf_brenton at concsols.com> wrote in message
> news:429e16e3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
>
|
I think my idea reaches the spot where it doesnt go over the line :)
Jun 2, 2005, 10:38am
www.protonmedia.com has a "4.0" client
Jun 2, 2005, 10:39am
Who needs the SDK to do what
Jun 2, 2005, 10:40am
*that
[View Quote]"R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:429efe0b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Who needs the SDK to do what
>
|
Jun 2, 2005, 5:28pm
Probably shouldent have said that you o_0
--
- Mark Randall
http://zetech.swehli.com
[View Quote]"R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:429efe2b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *that
|
Jun 2, 2005, 5:32pm
wow, that really isn't that great O_o
remember the good old days when AW used to have good, useful, and still
simple updates? like terrain, and such?
-SWE
[View Quote]"R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:429efdd4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> www.protonmedia.com has a "4.0" client
>
|
Jun 2, 2005, 6:35pm
I realy dont think its the full version though....
[View Quote]"SWE" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:429f5ece at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> wow, that really isn't that great O_o
> remember the good old days when AW used to have good, useful, and still
> simple updates? like terrain, and such?
>
> -SWE
>
> "R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:429efdd4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 2, 2005, 8:12pm
yea version numbering is messy. they need to do it better. we will never see
4.1
[View Quote]"Lady NightHawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:429d5789 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> One has to wonder why we're all on 3.6 (567) if there's already a 4.1? I
can
> see alpha or beta testing it but that's alot of versions off from what we
> currently have isn't it??? Shouldn't we be on 4.0 if 4.1 is in alpha/beta?
> What's in 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 4.0 ... not to mention all the subbuilds of
> those like 568, 569, 570 ... heck we'll never see 4.1 at this rate LOL
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> "Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
> news:429cf490$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
push
>
|
Jun 4, 2005, 8:26am
So why haven't we got one?
-=LtB=-
[View Quote]"R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:429efdd4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> www.protonmedia.com has a "4.0" client
>
|
Jun 4, 2005, 10:13am
Because PM is a corprate customer and pays several tens of thousand times
more than we do?
--
- Mark Randall
http://zetech.swehli.com
[View Quote]"LtBrenton" <uaf_brenton at concsols.com> wrote in message
news:42a181d9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So why haven't we got one?
>
> -=LtB=-
>
> "R i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:429efdd4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2005, 12:03pm
Uhh, I thought Active Worlds was AWI's flagship universe.
So why is AW running an inferior version? o_O
-=LtB=-
[View Quote]"Strike Rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:42a19ae7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Because PM is a corprate customer and pays several tens of thousand times
> more than we do?
>
> --
> - Mark Randall
> http://zetech.swehli.com
>
> "LtBrenton" <uaf_brenton at concsols.com> wrote in message
> news:42a181d9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 4, 2005, 12:19pm
They are constantly working on newer versions, 90% of stuff from corprate
builds will find its way into AW, however - when AW 4x comes it will be a
big improvement.
--
- Mark Randall
http://zetech.swehli.com
[View Quote]"LtBrenton" <uaf_brenton at concsols.com> wrote in message
news:42a1b4c7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Uhh, I thought Active Worlds was AWI's flagship universe.
> So why is AW running an inferior version? o_O
|
|
