1  ...  8  9  10  11  |   Order by default

Jun 29, 2004, 12:10am

Unfortunately, PK's are powerless against AW the company. They are
there to try to help resolve conflict between the people. They have no
authority to act as a liaison between the people in AW.

[View Quote] > Then complain to the PK organisation about them. The PK organisation
> isn't LIKE the GK organisation. They WILL actually FOLLOW UP their
> complaints.
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 12:12am

Unfortunately, PK's are powerless against AW the company. They are
there to try to help resolve conflict between the people. They have no
authority to act as a liaison between the people and AW.

Regarding PK's following up on their own, they do not provide feedback
to a complaint by email explaining actions (if any) taken against an
abusive PK. If there is action taken, sometimes that PK is allowed back
at his or her duties (only to resume their abusive language, actions or
both). And sometimes there is no action taken whatsoever.

[View Quote] > Then complain to the PK organisation about them. The PK organisation
> isn't LIKE the GK organisation. They WILL actually FOLLOW UP their
> complaints.
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 12:13am

Unfortunately, PK's are powerless against AW the company. They are
there to try to help resolve conflict between the people. They have no
authority to act as a liaison between the people and AW.

Regarding PK's following up on their own, they do not provide feedback
to a complaint by email explaining actions (if any) taken against an
abusive PK. If there is action taken, sometimes that PK is allowed back
at his or her duties (only to resume their abusive language, actions or
both). And sometimes there is no action taken whatsoever.

[View Quote] > Then complain to the PK organisation about them. The PK organisation
> isn't LIKE the GK organisation. They WILL actually FOLLOW UP their
> complaints.
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 12:13am

Unfortunately, PK's are powerless against AW the company. They are
there to try to help resolve conflict between the people. They have no
authority to act as a liaison between the people and AW.

Regarding PK's following up on their own, they do not provide feedback
to a complaint by email explaining actions (if any) taken against an
abusive PK. If there is action taken, sometimes that PK is allowed back
at his or her duties (only to resume their abusive language, actions or
both). And sometimes there is no action taken whatsoever.

[View Quote] > Then complain to the PK organisation about them. The PK organisation
> isn't LIKE the GK organisation. They WILL actually FOLLOW UP their
> complaints.
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 12:13am

Unfortunately, PK's are powerless against AW the company. They are
there to try to help resolve conflict between the people. They have no
authority to act as a liaison between the people and AW.

Regarding PK's following up on their own, they do not provide feedback
to a complaint by email explaining actions (if any) taken against an
abusive PK. If there is action taken, sometimes that PK is allowed back
at his or her duties (only to resume their abusive language, actions or
both). And sometimes there is no action taken whatsoever.

[View Quote] > Then complain to the PK organisation about them. The PK organisation
> isn't LIKE the GK organisation. They WILL actually FOLLOW UP their
> complaints.
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 12:16am

Unfortunately, PK's are powerless against AW the company. They are
there to try to help resolve conflict between the people. They have no
authority to act as a liaison between the people and AW.

Regarding PK's following up on their own, they do not provide feedback
to a complaint by email explaining actions (if any) taken against an
abusive PK. If there is action taken, sometimes that PK is allowed back
at his or her duties (only to resume their abusive language, actions or
both). And sometimes there is no action taken whatsoever.

[View Quote] > Then complain to the PK organisation about them. The PK organisation
> isn't LIKE the GK organisation. They WILL actually FOLLOW UP their
> complaints.
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 1:59am

The administration in AW has not been professional at all times, nor
have they made a reasonable effort to resolve serious problems submitted
to them. They have, at times acted as if they cant hear you on the
telephone and hang up on you. It's reasonable to question their motives
and those they appoint to keep control of the masses of people.

Corrupt PK's and AW the Company

[View Quote] > Does AW not rely on them to do an important job that they would otherwise
> have to do themselves AND pay for it?
>
[View Quote]

Jun 29, 2004, 7:56am

Bluilderz, this is information given to the community, not flaming. It
belongs in the community newsgroup.

[View Quote] > I'm just going to say this now before we have dozens of flames...
> Please, don't reply to this thread. Please? Pretty please with sugar on
> top? If everyone wants to moan at this or bitch at that, please start
> your own forum or newsgroup and do it there, okay? *hopes there aren't
> six flames when he reads the newsgroups again*
>
> Builderz
> http://www.3DHost.net

1  ...  8  9  10  11  |   Order by default