ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
AMD Athlon 64 (General Discussion)
AMD Athlon 64 // General DiscussionbowenSep 30, 2003, 6:12pm
[View Quote]
Uh, read again, I was talking about the systems as a whole. I'd love to
see your fat ass waddle to and fro, but we'll save that for another time. Learn to control your thumb and I'll spell the adjective correctly, oh and learn to capitalize the first letter of a sentence. -- --Bowen-- http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/ Yeah, it's that good. (Maybe an AW section in the near future?) binarybudSep 30, 2003, 6:33pm
Since when do I have a fat ass? LOL Your always mouthing off about what you believe are facts. Loser.
[View Quote] bowenSep 30, 2003, 6:34pm
[View Quote]
Uh, since someone from AW posted the picture of you and you acknowledged
it was you. And that person was huge. Like, Tyrannosaurus huge. -- --Bowen-- http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/ Yeah, it's that good. (Maybe an AW section in the near future?) binarybudSep 30, 2003, 6:50pm
LOL YOU DON'T KNOW ME FROM ADAM.....Stop talking like you do.
Your such a loser Bowen only pictures of me on here are of my face.....and the aspect ratio is wrong on that pic anyhow.... How the hell do you know how big my ass is? LOL I know you have this fetish with asses....but leave mine out of this will ya? LOL [View Quote] bowenSep 30, 2003, 6:56pm
[View Quote]
Oh yes baby, smack that ass. Oh god, oh yes, oohhhh.
-- --Bowen-- http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/ Yeah, it's that good. (Maybe an AW section in the near future?) binarybudSep 30, 2003, 7:01pm
byte meOct 2, 2003, 12:55pm
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9488%5E9494,00.html
Check out the section on the bus speed the Athlon 64FX supports. Thanks ;) [View Quote] bowenOct 2, 2003, 5:48pm
[View Quote]
Heh, too bad it offers no real benefits. ;)
-- --Bowen-- http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/ Yeah, it's that good. (Maybe an AW section in the near future?) percipientNov 26, 2003, 9:21pm
"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote...
<snip> | Now, the faux pas of not being able to compare any two chips produced by | different companies is a non-sequitor. You can only use that if you're | comparing two seperate types of processors, ie Alpha and x86, | Apple(Motorola) and x86, so on. As for comparing like processors, it's | actually very good. (especially in the FSB) <snip> Modern Apple processors are made by IBM, no longer Motorola. IBM, as many of you probably know, is the parent company of AMD. That's why both AMD and Apple chips brag about similar stuff, like shorter pipelines, 32-bit being native instead of emulated on the new 64-bit chips, and not looking at just the megahertz rating. But, I digress slightly from the topic at hand... |