|
new window (Wishlist)
new window // Wishlist
Aug 23, 2003, 4:04pm
id like also to be a mini window, like in some things, just like in the
right hand corner, that isn't the 3d web but like a small window with a
border target=aw_3dcorner or something.
also about alexthemartians post, maybe That'd be good to have a transparent
section, so you could do health bars, or magic bars, or stuff like that but
still have the browser, so you could have it overlayed on the screen, and
that would allow really nice effects, imagine being in lets say AWRPG, and
being able to se your hp, or being in mutation and seeing how many potions
you have, by clicking on the thing you could use it because it is a web
window,
Aug 23, 2003, 4:28pm
Apparently in 4.0, there will be supports for HUDs... Wait till then.
-Joe
[View Quote]"crazy pills" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3f47aca3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> id like also to be a mini window, like in some things, just like in the
> right hand corner, that isn't the 3d web but like a small window with a
> border target=aw_3dcorner or something.
>
>
> also about alexthemartians post, maybe That'd be good to have a
transparent
> section, so you could do health bars, or magic bars, or stuff like that
but
> still have the browser, so you could have it overlayed on the screen, and
> that would allow really nice effects, imagine being in lets say AWRPG, and
> being able to se your hp, or being in mutation and seeing how many potions
> you have, by clicking on the thing you could use it because it is a web
> window,
>
>
|
Aug 23, 2003, 5:48pm
4.0 would (they would have us believe) include browser GUI plugins.. so
HUD's would be on (which is good, im gonna get designing mine and shoving it
into C++! - Course.. when the system comes out and is completly diff ill be
screwed but what the hell!)
- Mark
[View Quote]"joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
news:3f47b263$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Apparently in 4.0, there will be supports for HUDs... Wait till then.
>
> -Joe
|
Aug 23, 2003, 5:54pm
Uh, ok, you do that. Go make up some non-existent code outlines and make
some bad plug-in for it... But, why would you whine about having to
reprogram it? I mean, there's no specs for a plug-in yet, so you'd just be
creating a fake one just for fun. You cant say that it was for AW, because
AW doesn't support them. So you're not reprogramming your AW plug-in, you'd
be porting your crap plug-in in AW.
-Joe
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f47c520$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 4.0 would (they would have us believe) include browser GUI plugins.. so
> HUD's would be on (which is good, im gonna get designing mine and shoving
it
> into C++! - Course.. when the system comes out and is completly diff ill
be
> screwed but what the hell!)
>
> - Mark
>
> "joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
> news:3f47b263$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 23, 2003, 6:15pm
egh.. well if its GUI changes.. its gonna obviously have the standard
functions.. so lines and text o.0 meaning I can just rip it from my old AW
hud that used a semi-transparant window...
- Mark
[View Quote]"joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
news:3f47c662$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Uh, ok, you do that. Go make up some non-existent code outlines and make
> some bad plug-in for it... But, why would you whine about having to
> reprogram it? I mean, there's no specs for a plug-in yet, so you'd just
be
> creating a fake one just for fun. You cant say that it was for AW,
because
> AW doesn't support them. So you're not reprogramming your AW plug-in,
you'd
> be porting your crap plug-in in AW.
>
> -Joe
|
Aug 23, 2003, 8:13pm
No transparent windows! No! God noo!!! asdflasjflaskf! People like me, that
still use windows 95, wont be able to see them!!!
-Joe
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f47cb6f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> egh.. well if its GUI changes.. its gonna obviously have the standard
> functions.. so lines and text o.0 meaning I can just rip it from my old AW
> hud that used a semi-transparant window...
>
> - Mark
>
> "joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
> news:3f47c662$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
make
> be
> because
> you'd
>
>
|
Aug 23, 2003, 10:51pm
you mean Heads Up Displays? I hope so, that would make AW better sort of
[View Quote]"joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
news:3f47b263$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Apparently in 4.0, there will be supports for HUDs... Wait till then.
>
> -Joe
>
> "crazy pills" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f47aca3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> transparent
> but
and
and
potions
>
>
|
Aug 24, 2003, 1:17am
No, I mean Huge Up Downs, the emotional disturbances found in small animals.
-Joe
[View Quote]"calhoun" <coen at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3f480c10 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you mean Heads Up Displays? I hope so, that would make AW better sort of
> "joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
> news:3f47b263$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
a
that
> and
> and
> potions
web
>
>
|
Aug 24, 2003, 8:30am
Psssst, it was a personal thing just for my bot :O Now its royally broken
- Mark
[View Quote]"joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
news:3f47e70a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No transparent windows! No! God noo!!! asdflasjflaskf! People like me,
that
> still use windows 95, wont be able to see them!!!
>
> -Joe
|
Aug 24, 2003, 5:12pm
[View Quote]joeman wrote:
> No transparent windows! No! God noo!!! asdflasjflaskf! People like me, that
> still use windows 95, wont be able to see them!!!
|
Transparent windows are really buggy and crappy sometimes.
--
--Bowen--
No of SETI units returned: 74
Processing time: 66 days, 6 hours.
(Total hours: 1590)
www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
Aug 26, 2003, 5:27pm
are you talking about the transparency like 90% 50%.. or do you mean the
ones where parts of the window is completly see thu, as in you can even
click thru it.. and the 2nd one dont work in 95 i think and the 1st only
works in 2k+ ... no on all my posts about this topic im talking about that
2nd thing
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f490e29$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> joeman wrote:
that
>
> Transparent windows are really buggy and crappy sometimes.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
>
> No of SETI units returned: 74
> Processing time: 66 days, 6 hours.
> (Total hours: 1590)
> www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
>
|
Aug 26, 2003, 5:28pm
[View Quote]alexthemartian wrote:
> are you talking about the transparency like 90% 50%.. or do you mean the
> ones where parts of the window is completly see thu, as in you can even
> click thru it.. and the 2nd one dont work in 95 i think and the 1st only
> works in 2k+ ... no on all my posts about this topic im talking about that
> 2nd thing
|
Transparencies are only compatible with 2K or XP. Pseudo transparencies
are another story.
--
--Bowen--
http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
Linux is a godly OS, that's an understatement.
Aug 28, 2003, 2:52am
i said that, know that, even the whole reply is explaining that :-/
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f4bb4f5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> alexthemartian wrote:
that
>
> Transparencies are only compatible with 2K or XP. Pseudo transparencies
> are another story.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
> http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
> Linux is a godly OS, that's an understatement.
>
|
Aug 28, 2003, 3:47am
[View Quote]alexthemartian wrote:
> i said that, know that, even the whole reply is explaining that :-/
|
You were a little lax on the actual differentiation. You can control
which part of the window you want to be transparent with the programming
API I'd assume, even in 2k. Windows 9x has no facility for transparency
other than some insanly ingenuis programming ideas.
--
--Bowen--
http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
Linux is a godly OS, that's an understatement.
Aug 28, 2003, 5:26am
im talking the same thing that causes certin skins to be shapes other then
square.. that can even be done on win98
but in this case it wont be used for skins
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f4d976d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> alexthemartian wrote:
>
> You were a little lax on the actual differentiation. You can control
> which part of the window you want to be transparent with the programming
> API I'd assume, even in 2k. Windows 9x has no facility for transparency
> other than some insanly ingenuis programming ideas.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
> http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
> Linux is a godly OS, that's an understatement.
>
|
Aug 28, 2003, 5:47am
[View Quote]alexthemartian wrote:
> im talking the same thing that causes certin skins to be shapes other then
> square.. that can even be done on win98
>
> but in this case it wont be used for skins
|
Blah, that's not transparency.
--
--Bowen--
http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
Linux is a godly OS, that's an understatement.
Aug 29, 2003, 9:54pm
i said transparency becuase my brain can not work fast enough to think of
what it reall is.... this thread have been going on enough the point is out
there
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f4db394$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> alexthemartian wrote:
then
>
> Blah, that's not transparency.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
> http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
> Linux is a godly OS, that's an understatement.
>
|
Aug 30, 2003, 4:08am
[View Quote]alexthemartian wrote:
> i said transparency becuase my brain can not work fast enough to think of
> what it reall is.... this thread have been going on enough the point is out
> there
|
So, you mean I'm god.
--
--Bowen--
http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
Yeah, it's that good.
(Maybe an AW section in the near future?)
Aug 30, 2003, 11:48pm
no i mean i cant think fast sometimes
[View Quote]"bowen" <Bowen at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3f503f64$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> alexthemartian wrote:
of
out
>
> So, you mean I'm god.
>
> --
> --Bowen--
> http://bowen.homelinux.com/sys/
> Yeah, it's that good.
> (Maybe an AW section in the near future?)
>
|
|