|
|
AW Building Inspector (Wishlist)
AW Building Inspector // Wishlist
Aug 9, 2003, 2:32am
what can I say? it sucks ... if you try to modify ANY object and space is
filled it says its filled ..... I AM NOT BUILDING A NEW OBJECT! I am not
building new objects I am changing an object ..... its stupid that it thinks
changing is building and I am sick of this there are 2 things for AW to do
to fix this:
1. FIX THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
or 2. ENABLE HUGE SPACE IN ALL AWI OWNED WORLDS
I would rather settle for FIX the building inspector!!
Aug 9, 2003, 3:37am
LOL no offence thats a newbish error there...
aw building inspector dosnt care changin and object even gettign rid of
stuff when cell data is full still ads cell data.. i coudl have pp16.rwx in
a cell and its labled create color red, then after that i chaneg it to
create color blue and it was fu lbefore it dosnt matter
[View Quote]"calhoun" <coen at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3f347970$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what can I say? it sucks ... if you try to modify ANY object and space is
> filled it says its filled ..... I AM NOT BUILDING A NEW OBJECT! I am not
> building new objects I am changing an object ..... its stupid that it
thinks
> changing is building and I am sick of this there are 2 things for AW to do
> to fix this:
>
> 1. FIX THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
> or 2. ENABLE HUGE SPACE IN ALL AWI OWNED WORLDS
> I would rather settle for FIX the building inspector!!
>
>
|
Aug 9, 2003, 4:11am
When an object is "changed", the AW browser (and the SDK, too) first tries to add the new object, and then delete the old. In a sense, you ARE trying to build a new object. This obviously needs to be reversed -- delete first, and then add it back.
[View Quote]calhoun wrote:
> what can I say? it sucks ... if you try to modify ANY object and space is filled it says its filled ..... I AM NOT BUILDING A NEW OBJECT! I am not building new objects I am changing an object ..... its stupid that it thinks changing is building and I am sick of this there are 2 things for AW to do to fix this:
>
> 1. FIX THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
> or 2. ENABLE HUGE SPACE IN ALL AWI OWNED WORLDS
> I would rather settle for FIX the building inspector!!
|
Aug 9, 2003, 4:18am
yeah
[View Quote]"tony m" <tony at homeunix.uni.cc> wrote in message
news:3f349089$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When an object is "changed", the AW browser (and the SDK, too) first tries
to add the new object, and then delete the old. In a sense, you ARE trying
to build a new object. This obviously needs to be reversed -- delete first,
and then add it back.
>
> calhoun wrote:
is filled it says its filled ..... I AM NOT BUILDING A NEW OBJECT! I am not
building new objects I am changing an object ..... its stupid that it thinks
changing is building and I am sick of this there are 2 things for AW to do
to fix this:
>
|
Aug 9, 2003, 9:40am
Hmmm, the reason it tries to add first is so you do not see the
transition I think. Also, suppose it deletes first and then can't
add. You lose everything. The length of the name of the model, the
length of the description and action fields all add up to calculate
how much more can be added, so an add after a delete can fail.
Alex
[View Quote]On 9 Aug 2003 02:11:21 -0400, "tony m" <tony at homeunix.uni.cc> wrote:
|
>When an object is "changed", the AW browser (and the SDK, too) first tries to add the new object, and then delete the old. In a sense, you ARE trying to build a new object. This obviously needs to be reversed -- delete first, and then add it back.
>
[View Quote]
Aug 9, 2003, 4:12pm
Move it to the neighbouring tile and change it there, after it's changed you can move it
back.
[View Quote]"xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
news:dpm9jvgp2skfjd1gcdrdbulcqjm2uq4olb at 4ax.com...
> Hmmm, the reason it tries to add first is so you do not see the
> transition I think. Also, suppose it deletes first and then can't
> add. You lose everything. The length of the name of the model, the
> length of the description and action fields all add up to calculate
> how much more can be added, so an add after a delete can fail.
>
> Alex
>
> On 9 Aug 2003 02:11:21 -0400, "tony m" <tony at homeunix.uni.cc> wrote:
>
new object, and then delete the old. In a sense, you ARE trying to build a new object.
This obviously needs to be reversed -- delete first, and then add it back.
says its filled ..... I AM NOT BUILDING A NEW OBJECT! I am not building new objects I am
changing an object ..... its stupid that it thinks changing is building and I am sick of
this there are 2 things for AW to do to fix this:
>
|
Aug 9, 2003, 10:17pm
I know but its stupid to have to do a trick because of AW's mistakes ...
[View Quote]"starfleet" <Starfleet at Command.com> wrote in message
news:3f35399c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Move it to the neighbouring tile and change it there, after it's changed
you can move it
> back.
>
> "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
> news:dpm9jvgp2skfjd1gcdrdbulcqjm2uq4olb at 4ax.com...
tries to add the
> new object, and then delete the old. In a sense, you ARE trying to build a
new object.
> This obviously needs to be reversed -- delete first, and then add it back.
space is filled it
> says its filled ..... I AM NOT BUILDING A NEW OBJECT! I am not building
new objects I am
> changing an object ..... its stupid that it thinks changing is building
and I am sick of
> this there are 2 things for AW to do to fix this:
>
>
|
|
