1  2  3  4  |   Order by index

Nov 24, 1998, 8:52pm

Your right about that..
But why am I immature?
Have I been unreasonable or childish?
Well sorry then....
It was not my intention, that's for sure.

[View Quote]

Nov 24, 1998, 8:54pm

list of people who have been childish in this newsgroup in the last week:
Fluxen
Cubic
Josh
Eep

[View Quote]

Nov 24, 1998, 9:24pm

I don't want EITHER newsgroup bothered with long, f***ing idiotic and stupid
threads... awcommunity is for AW-related matters (if only loosely), not
flames. *puts on ignore thread*

[View Quote]

Nov 24, 1998, 9:26pm

Funny...
Why do people learn so slow...
What we heave been discussing too was reasonable argumentation.
My question was: Why am I immature?
So again: Why have I been immature? Because I make my point?
Please give an answer to that. Calling people childish is tooo easy.

Besides; me and Fluxen were the ones who moved the discussion to
awcommunity. Or is it also *there* forbidden to discuss thorouhly?

P.S.
Would you mind showing some cooperation moving this thread to awcommunity?
Thnxx. I posted this one to both. Plz reply to awcommunity only if you don't
want the wishlist to be bothered with long thorough discussion threads.

[View Quote]

Nov 24, 1998, 10:12pm

Dthknight has also been childish in this newsgroup :-)

grover

[View Quote] > I don't want EITHER newsgroup bothered with long, f***ing idiotic and stupid
> threads... awcommunity is for AW-related matters (if only loosely), not
> flames. *puts on ignore thread*
>
[View Quote]

Nov 24, 1998, 11:00pm

well it's obvious I turned off ignore thread long enough to read this
post... I don't see how anyone could want flames though, which is all this
thread is pretty much. I assume you're just playing around grover... if not,
could you please tell me via e-mail how I'm being childish? personally I see
wanting to stop the flames as being mature, not childish.

"Do Not Feed The Energy Creature[s]" - Athena

*ignore thread on for good*

[View Quote]

Nov 24, 1998, 11:54pm

[View Quote] Right on Dean;

If you want to fight FIRE, you use WATER.

What a concept, ehh?

ScottyDM

--
Please send all SPAMS, FLAMES, and CONSPIRACY THEORIES to
scottydm at cwia.com
Send all other IMPORTANT CORRESPONDENCE to scottydm at codenet.net
___
/////\\ Digitally Enhanced Portrait of:
{|-0-0-|} Scott D. Miller,
| % | Silicon Mercenary
\===/ Freelance Chip Designer

always #5 FOO = ~FOO; // the sound of a beating heart

Nov 25, 1998, 4:57am

Dthknight,

You want to know why grover finds you childish.....
You may not have noticed it, but I have asked you that same question 2 times
already.
Plz let me know via e-mail what you think childish about my 'contributions'
to this thread.

[View Quote]

Nov 25, 1998, 3:09pm

Actually, i was just being a wise-ass when I called dth that...
Was referring to him "swearing" :-)

grover

[View Quote] > Dthknight,
>
> You want to know why grover finds you childish.....
> You may not have noticed it, but I have asked you that same question 2 times
> already.
> Plz let me know via e-mail what you think childish about my 'contributions'
> to this thread.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 25, 1998, 10:18pm

Is there now a point to these messages?... Are they about AW?....Will they in
any way enhance AW?.. Are the messages informative?...

There is constructive criticism and destructive criticism in my humble opinion
this news thread has now entered the latter stage and has nothing to do with
Custom Avatars.

This thread should now be called, "The Psychology of the individuals behind the
Avatars in a Virtual Environment".

Klassi



[View Quote] > Funny...
> Why do people learn so slow...
> What we heave been discussing too was reasonable argumentation.
> My question was: Why am I immature?
> So again: Why have I been immature? Because I make my point?
> Please give an answer to that. Calling people childish is tooo easy.
>
> Besides; me and Fluxen were the ones who moved the discussion to
> awcommunity. Or is it also *there* forbidden to discuss thorouhly?
>
> P.S.
> Would you mind showing some cooperation moving this thread to awcommunity?
> Thnxx. I posted this one to both. Plz reply to awcommunity only if you don't
> want the wishlist to be bothered with long thorough discussion threads.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 1:25am

Yes, but if you come, you should adapt to the situation. Not the other way
around.

--

Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com

Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
poor at I/O.

[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 1:27am

Oh... well, one doesn't need *me* to make fun op your opinion, heheh. :-)

--

Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com

Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
poor at I/O.

[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 1:29am

Heheh... sorry Xav. When can I come out? ;-)

(Andeh... please don't comment on my english; I don't comment on your dutch
;-)

--

Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com

Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
poor at I/O.


[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 1:30am

Eep²? Huh? We didn't need *him* now ;-)

--

Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com

Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
poor at I/O.

[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 5:51am

[View Quote] > Is there now a point to these messages?... Are they about AW?....Will they in
> any way enhance AW?.. Are the messages informative?...
>
> There is constructive criticism and destructive criticism in my humble opinion
> this news thread has now entered the latter stage and has nothing to do with
> Custom Avatars.
>
> This thread should now be called, "The Psychology of the individuals behind the
> Avatars in a Virtual Environment".
>

Hmmm... yes, the thread could be renamed. Otherwise I don't see any problem. It's
up to everyone to follow it and participate or not. Maybe it's not informative, or
constructive in the sense of some new tips and tricks or ideas for them.
Nevertheless as you say there are individuals behind avatars. This is a ng about
the community of users, not the community of avatars. Now it's clear with
individuals we may expect and must accept it's not always as rational as we would
like.
But when today the avatars are "down", I'm glad to see the individuals aren't. A
revenge on the logics, the constructive, the "enhance" without taking the time to
look around, to talk without always wondering if what we say is "correct" and
appropriate. Crazy, useless, superficial is what we have to enjoy when the power is
off.

Nov 26, 1998, 1:12pm

Mmm.. Interesting indeed.
Psychology.
As Charles Darwin said: Nobody does anything 'just as a favour'
So there's gotta be a thought behind everything like 'I'll get something in
return'. Or 'This is a profitable deed for me.'
If we look at it like that, we probably flame each other just to *get*
flamed. ;-)
Or we think it's profitable (get nice reactions). So we flame each
other to raise our reputation. :-S


[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 1:56pm

Interesting idea, but I think you have a flaw in your premise....is flaming
someone, really *a favour*? :)
Please note...this is neither a flame nor a favour. Just more of my senseless
prattling for which I expect nothing in return. :)

[View Quote] > Mmm.. Interesting indeed.
> Psychology.
> As Charles Darwin said: Nobody does anything 'just as a favour'
> So there's gotta be a thought behind everything like 'I'll get something in
> return'. Or 'This is a profitable deed for me.'
> If we look at it like that, we probably flame each other just to *get*
> flamed. ;-)
> Or we think it's profitable (get nice reactions). So we flame each
> other to raise our reputation. :-S
>
[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 3:10pm

wow! this is the logest line of replys i have seen yet!
this is a historical moment for me

Nov 26, 1998, 3:13pm

hey msn, we have somethin' in commen!
i was also a citizen of AW when it was free, no telegrams, no contacts etc.
here's my cit. number: 249797

[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 3:14pm

i see that you (klassi & Josh) can walk the walk, but can you talk the talk?

Nov 26, 1998, 3:38pm

Done ;-)

--

Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com

Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
poor at I/O.

[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 3:49pm

Nevertheless, Queen Bee, you have my undying admiration. Now, what does that
say about my psychology??? :-))))))))

Nov 26, 1998, 5:01pm

Dean, first off I think you need to just calm down a little, c'mon man,
breathe...IN and out...yes that's it .. relax ... your freedoms aren't being
compromised yet, so just chill on the revolution.

Ok next, I think custom avs should be aloud in any world, why? Like I said,
your avs working in some worlds but not others would pretty much render the
feature pointless.

If you want to keep your worlds in theme, I suggest a sign telling users to
please use the avatars selected. OR bring in only avatars having to do with
that theme. If you think about it this could lead to a fuller, richer
environment for the users. Wouldn't your world be popular if it was made
like old west - all the users with cowboy/cowgirl fetishes would want to
hang out there in their avs wouldn't they?

Also, the eject command still works...if you do happen to see a random
offence to your ocular organs you can just zip em outta there. And that
idea from grover about banning their URL's...genius!

World setting to toggle cust avs could be added too, but I think, like I
said before, this would probably lead to a lot less traffic for those worlds
restricting user personalization.

Ok l8tes

-raiven-

Nov 26, 1998, 7:16pm

Sure can if it is contructive.

[View Quote] > i see that you (klassi & Josh) can walk the walk, but can you talk the talk?

Nov 26, 1998, 7:23pm

I just connect and enjoy AW, and other online services. I need a challenge, which at
this moment is becoming a 'good' builder in AW.. I need to enjoy myself, this I get
from interacting with people from all over the planet..

Differences of opinion are just that, everyone has his/her own opinion which I respect,
whether I agree or disagree with them isn't the point, whether I think they are right
or wrong doesn't matter. I am not in a position to judge others or compete with them in
anyway, I only compete with myself.

Klassi

[View Quote] [View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 7:27pm

Now that is allot better :-)

....... No comment on that..... If I did comment I would have to create a totally
new newsgroup or allocate web space to the subject.

Klassi

[View Quote] > Done ;-)
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 7:32pm

I do many things for no reward, many times I have said, "No" and was offered
money, this offended me....So Charles Darwin is wrong. Charles Darwin had the
arrogance to speak for all mankind?.

Klassi

[View Quote] > Mmm.. Interesting indeed.
> Psychology.
> As Charles Darwin said: Nobody does anything 'just as a favour'
> So there's gotta be a thought behind everything like 'I'll get something in
> return'. Or 'This is a profitable deed for me.'
> If we look at it like that, we probably flame each other just to *get*
> flamed. ;-)
> Or we think it's profitable (get nice reactions). So we flame each
> other to raise our reputation. :-S
>
[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 7:35pm

I don't recognise flaming so as far as I am concered it doesn't exist!...

[View Quote] > Interesting idea, but I think you have a flaw in your premise....is flaming
> someone, really *a favour*? :)
> Please note...this is neither a flame nor a favour. Just more of my senseless
> prattling for which I expect nothing in return. :)
>
[View Quote]

Nov 26, 1998, 7:36pm

That you are a human who has like and dislikes and expresses them.. Quite a
normal thing to do.

[View Quote] > Nevertheless, Queen Bee, you have my undying admiration. Now, what does that
> say about my psychology??? :-))))))))

Nov 26, 1998, 7:37pm

Very true, but some have more than others...



[View Quote] > Well, everyone's got his/her weaknesses... ;-) lol
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

1  2  3  4  |   Order by index