1  |   Order by index

Nov 2, 2004, 1:01pm

Hi guys,

Just so you are aware, there have been several tourists coming into AW and
talking about this "new, cool, adult universe that AW Inc. is running". If
you check out the site (which is now on our eject list) you will see that
they copyright and license everything, AW, Inc.

This is NOT an Activeworlds, Inc. software developement or partner. It is
however a sleazy attempt for a chat site that seems to be using VZones with
naked avatars trying to pass itself off to the unwary.

Make sure you clearly understand the license agreement and you trust the
vendor of whatever software you download and run.


FYI


E

Nov 2, 2004, 1:33pm

darn no nudes for me :(

j/k

thanks for the info dude :) oh and go out and vote!
[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 1:42pm

Hey Enzo is this the activeworlds logo

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=f5b8rr.5.32


[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 2:23pm

the link is expired so I can't tell... we did a search the other day though
and there are quite a few companies using our TRADEMARKED logo so it very
well might be


E


[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 3:25pm

Thank you for the notice E N Z O, might I suggest that GKs be notified?

LNH



--

[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 3:44pm

tell me why it is on the eject list? its not a bad word


[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 3:44pm

link works here


[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 3:45pm

why should GK s be notified whets the problem???



[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 4:08pm

Why is "there.com" on the eject list?

John

[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 4:56pm

They should be notified, as well as PKs, because it's something AWI has
instituted ... otherwise if people get ejected for saying the urls and
GKs/PKs are not aware it will cause further confusion. Also, a suggestion,
why not have a sign or warning at the gate that certain urls will cause
ejection? Not all who speak them are doing it to spam.

LNH



--

[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 5:09pm

If I was being totally synical I would take this opertunity to point out how
much cash AWI would make from creating a Gor universe on a seperate host,
with increased prices (std procedure for adult products) and banning it in
AW...

- MR


[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 5:09pm

Because 99% of them dont know anything outside AWGate exists and hence, dont
know that these newsgroups exist, hence forth they will not have seen this
message.

- MR

[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 5:09pm

Becuase they ejected Rick for posting activeworlds.com in there, lol... as
they are effectivly trying to advertise in a competitors medium.

-MR

"johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.nospam.com> wrote :
> Why is "there.com" on the eject list?
>
> John

Nov 2, 2004, 5:15pm

Hmmm...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Stratagem Corporation
80 Nassau Street
New York, NY 10038
US

Domain Name: SEDUCITY.COM

Administrative Contact -
Billing Contact -
Technical Contact -
Graham English - graham at stratagem-corp.com
Stratagem Corporation
80 Nassau Street
New York, NY 10038
US
Phone - 917 842 6074
Fax - 509 694 8693

Record update date - 2004-07-17 07:16:02
Record create date - 2001-07-24
Record will expire on - 2005-07-24
Database last updated on - 2004-09-20 19:17:52 EST

Domain servers in listed order:

NS1.VZONES.COM 64.90.184.4
NS2.VZONES.COM 209.128.68.135
NS3.VZONES.COM 209.128.68.160

----------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way E N Z O, you ARE dumping all of their IP's to a seperate list to
check through, instead of just ejecting them for 5 minutes, arnt you?

- Mark
- Mark Randall's Evil Empire, Inc
For all your corporate espionage needs

Nov 2, 2004, 5:39pm

hence forth? You mean from now on?

E



[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 5:45pm

Ya ... *what he said* LOL

LNH



--

[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 5:47pm

"If I was being totally synical I would take this opertunity to point out
how
much cash AWI would make from creating a Gor universe on a seperate host,
with increased prices (std procedure for adult products) and banning it in
AW..."

From what I recall this world was created for these members of dreamscape
and vrzones that required a "adult" related world. I think it was around
2000 when it was created.

Its based of the now defunk Habitat software from Fututsi (thinks thats the
spelling) Fututsi ceased delevloping the software and when I talked to them
a few years ago they more or less sold everthing off, no dought to Stratagem
Corp who are developing it.

To make sure "adult" related material was seperated from the child
accessable worlds they created this world Enzo states.

Plus they can charge more and make more returns.

Nov 2, 2004, 5:52pm

Hmmm, no, bad grammar me.

Just forget the last forth.

- MR

[View Quote]

Nov 2, 2004, 9:57pm

i agree fully i have sugegsted this on many occasions...people say that gor
would lose money..but it in the end would gain them more visitors and
possibly cash.. imagine aw gor uniu owned by all the current aw gors...now
each of them gets 5 gor friends to buy a world from them for 20 a month or
w/e...the neach of them tells their friends...the nyou have the gor uniu,
paying its money to awi...and rick gets to be a bondage whore i nthe
process....and they have a problem with this WHY?


c to the P
[View Quote]

Nov 3, 2004, 3:25am

[View Quote] I agree, would keep many kids away from the Gor worlds also.



Yours Sincerely,
Samuël ML Lison

--
DreamCities.net - A Community for All! (http://www.dreamcities.net)
Jobs Available: http://business.dreamcities.net/jobs.html
Contact Me: http://about.dreamcities.net/contact.html

Nov 3, 2004, 3:28am

[View Quote] I agree with a Gor universe as long as those Gor world owners get to
have the worlds and citizenships transferred to this new universe at no
extra charge (until renewal time that is).




Yours Sincerely,
Samuël ML Lison

--
DreamCities.net - A Community for All! (http://www.dreamcities.net)
Jobs Available: http://business.dreamcities.net/jobs.html
Contact Me: http://about.dreamcities.net/contact.html

Nov 3, 2004, 1:01pm

I'll tell you why not freedom of speech?????



[View Quote]

Nov 3, 2004, 1:25pm

There is no such thing as "freedom of speech" when your in someone else's place of Business.
If you do not agree with that, then you ARE free to NOT enter that place of Business.




[View Quote]

Nov 3, 2004, 5:16pm

I realize bud that you don't understand what freedom is and im sorry but
there ARE things you can and cant say and do when you have a business I know
however I think its unfair to ask ppl not to say certain words and phrases
just because the owner of that business is afraid of the compitition has
nothing to do with me IF he would pay that much attention to running
the business FOR the customers then he would not have to worry that we go
find other products right? you know it is :-)


[View Quote]

Nov 3, 2004, 5:26pm

I TOTALLY understand what freedom means and is......what I do not understand is why you cannot understand how freedom applies to this Virtual Reality Software. Please get over it.....you, nor I, will never have a say in how freedoms are issued in this environment.....PERIOD.

Nov 3, 2004, 5:27pm

When I was in Phoenix this last Spring, my Sister and Neice and I went to a
restaurant for Mother's Day.
As we were sitting on the porch, waiting for our names to be called for a
table....
A vehicle pulled up and a lady jumped out with a handful of flyers in her
hand.
She ran up onto the restaurants porch and proceeded to holler out "NO
WAITING AT ******* Restaurant!" (A competitor down the block).
She then passed out the flyers which had a menu and specials on them for the
competeing restaurant.
I personally was offended at a competitor or one of thier employees or
patrons, interrupting my relaxing evening.
I immediately felt that what that person did was lower the image of thier
restaurant, and I will personally never eat at the intruders establishment
again.

In comparison, if a person wants to announce competition establishment, they
should do so either with thier friends in a non public place, or make a link
on a webpage, and let folks READ that advertising at thier liesure.

And that's all I have to say about that:)

Nov 3, 2004, 6:43pm

thank God for small blessings


[View Quote]

Nov 3, 2004, 6:46pm

Damned the entire idea of God because Bush wouldent be president if there
was no such thing.


[View Quote]

Nov 3, 2004, 7:50pm

but there is a God and he is president I thought you would agree :-)


[View Quote]

Nov 4, 2004, 6:52am

I'll just copy and paste this.. with some editing for context.

You know what, while we're at it, let's just blame each of the other 30% of
the country who voted republican primarily because of a different issue than
religion. I'm not a Bush supporter by any means, as I voted for someone
else, but let me point out to you something that you insightfully failed to
consider. Any of those groups can be blamed for tipping the election in
favor of Bush, so why are you singling out people who did so because of a
moral basis? What about the Neocons? Or the Gun-toting Capitalists? Hell,
how about the New York police and fire fighting forces?

There are better ways to express your anger for religion without projecting
it into your brand of politicking. Set up a dart board with Jesus' head on
it.

If there's one reason why I'm flustered, it's not because I practice a
particular religion and you happen to be bashing it among others. That
happens every day so please don't think me so petty as to sink down to that
level. It's because you can't seem to think of a well-thought out reason
why this group of people are to blame for four more years of wailing and
gnashing of teeth. If anything, its your liberal attitude that's
responsible for what you perceive as a sucky four years. So stop whining,
suck it up, and prepare for the next election. Whining never solved
anything. And Mr. Kerry has already figured that out. I suggest you go
back and re-read this post with that in mind so you don't reply thinking I'm
angry because of my religious roots.

Because, quite honestly... I can't stand the stupidity.


[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index